請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22216
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳尊賢(Zueng-Sang Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Chia Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林佳佳 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:13:55Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 李達源與莊愷瑋。2001。地裡統計於重金屬污染場址為害範圍界定之應用。地理統計在農業和環境科學之應用研討會論文集。
金恆鑣。1986。蓮華池地區森林土壤分類的研究─採用美國農部的土壤分類系統。林業試驗所研究報告季刊 1: 155-176。 崔君至。2000。南仁山區土壤性質在不同地形位置之分布。國立臺灣大學農業化 學所碩士論文。 陸象豫、黃良鑫、黃惠雪。2008。林業試驗所蓮華池硏究中心氣象紀錄彙整。農委會林業試驗所,臺北市。 張勵婉與黃正良。2007~2009。蓮華池25公頃闊葉林長期動態樣區調查與研究。農委會林業試驗所科技計畫期末報告。Personal communication, unpublished。 葛錦昭、楊炳炎、林淵霖、楊楚淇、漆陞忠。1978。台灣森林集水區經營試驗初 步報告。林業試驗所試驗報告第304號。 廖偉志。2006。福山天然闊葉林25公頃永久樣區土壤性質之空間變異。 鄭智馨、廖淑華、李達源、謝長富、陳尊賢。1996。南仁山區土壤性質之空間分布。中國農業化學會誌 34:547-559。 Atlas, R.M., and R. Bartha. 1998. Microbial ecology : fundamentals and applications Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif. Álvarez-Yépiz, J.C., A. Martínez-Yrízar, A. Búrquez, and C. Lindquist. 2008. Variation in vegetation structure and soil properties related to land use history of old-growth and secondary tropical dry forests in northwestern Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management 256:355-366. Barthold, F.K., R.F. Stallard, and H. Elsenbeer. 2008. Soil nutrient–landscape relationships in a lowland tropical rainforest in Panama. Forest Ecology and Management 255:1135-1148. Bengston, P., N. Basiliko, C.E. Prescott, and S.J. Grayston. 2007. Spatial dependency of soil nutrient availability and microbial properties in a mixed forest of Tsuga heterophylla and Pseudotsuga menziesii, in coastal British Columbia, Canada. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 39:2429-2435. Bennie, J., M.O. Hill, R. Baxter, and B. Huntley. 2006. Influence of slope and aspect on long-term vegetation change in British chalk grasslands. Journal of Ecology 94:355-368. Brady, N.C., and R.R. Weil. 2008. The nature and properties of soils Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. Budke, J.C., J.o.A. Jarenkow, and A.T.d. Oliveira-Filho. 2007. Relationships between tree component structure, topography and soils of a riverside forest, Rio Botucaraı´, Southern Brazil. Plant Ecology 189:187-200. Bunnell, F.L., D.E.N. Tait, P.W. Flanagan, and K.V. Cleve. 1977. Microbial respiration and substrate weight loss. I. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 9:33-40. Burke, I.C. 1989. Control of nitrogen mineralization in a sagebrush steppe landscape Ecology 70:1115-1126. Castilho, C.V.d., W.E. Magnusson, R.N.O.d. Arau´jo, R.C.C. Luiza˜o, F.v.J. Luiza˜o, A.P. Lima, and N. Higuchi. 2006. Variation in aboveground tree live biomass in a central Amazonian Forest: Effects of soil and topography. Forest Ecology and Management 234:85-96. Chang L.W., J.L. Hwong, S.T. Chiu, H.H. Wang, K.C. Yang, H. Y. Chang, C.F. Hsieh. 2010. Species composition, size-class structure, and diversity of the Lienhuachih forest dynamics plot in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in central Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science 25: 81-95. Chen, Z.S., C.F. Hsieh, F.Y. Jiang, T.H. Hsieh, and I.F. Sun. 1997. Relations of soil properties to topography and vegetation in a subtropical rain forest in southern Taiwan. Plant Ecology 132:229-241. Enoki, T., H. Kawagucji, and G. Iwatsubo. 1996. Topographic variations of soil properties and stand structure in a Pinus thunbergii plantation. Ecological Research 11:299-309. Florinsky, I.V., R.G. Eilers, G.R. Manning, and L.G. Fuller. 2002. Prediction of soil properties by digital terrain modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software 17:295-311. Fu, B.J., S.L. Liu, K.M.Ma, and Y.G. Zhu. 2004. Relationships between soil characteristics, topography and plant diversity in a heterogeneous deciduous broad-leaved forest near Beijing, China. Plant and Soil 261:47-54. Gardner, W.H. 1986. Water contant. pp.493-544. In A. Klute et al. (eds.) Method of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical method. Second edition. Agronomy Monograph 9. Madison, WI, USA. Gessler, P.E., O.A. Chadwick, F. Chamran, L. Althouse, and K. Holmes. 2000. Modeling soil–landscape and ecosystem properties using terrain attributes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64:2046-2056. Gosz, J.R., G.E. Likens, and F.H. Bormann. 1976. Organic matter and nutrient dynamics of the forest and forest floor in the Hubbard Brook forest. Oecologia 22:305-320. Griffiths, R.P., M.D. Madritch, and A.K. Swanson. 2009. The effects of topography on forest soil characteristics in the Oregon Cascade Mountains (USA): Implications for the effects of climate change on soil properties. Forest Ecology and Management 257:1-7. Helmke, P.A., and D.L. Sparks. 1996. Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, and cesium. pp.551-574. In D.L. Sparker et al.(eds.) Method of soil analysis, Part 3. Chemical methods. SSSA and ASA. Madison, WI, USA. Huggett, R.J. 1975. Soil landscape systems: a model of soil genesis. Geoderma 13:1-22. Jenny, H. 1941. Factors of soil formation; a system of quantitative pedology McGraw-Hill, London. Johnston, M.H. 1992. Soil-vegetation relationships in a tabonuco forest community in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 8:253-263. Kang, S., D. Lee, J. Lee, and S.W. Running. 2006. Topographic and climatic controls on soil environments and net primary production in a rugged temperate hardwood forest in Korea. Ecol. Res. 21:64-74. Keeney, D.R. 1982. Nitrogen-availability indices. pp. 711-734. In A.L. Page et.al. (eds.) Method of soil analysis, Part 2. Chemical and microbiology properties. Second edition. Agronomy Monograph 9. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, USA. Laurance, W.F., P.M. Fearnside, S.G. Laurance, P. Delamonica, T.E. Lovejoy, J.M.R.-d. Merona, J. Q.Chambers, and C. Gascon. 1999. Relationship between soils and Amazon forest biomass: a landscape-scale study. Forest Ecology and Management 118:127-138. Litaor, M.I., M. Williams, and T.R. Seastedt. 2008. Topographic controls on snow distribution, soil moisture, and species diversity of herbaceous alpine vegetation, Niwot Ridge, Colorado. Journal of geophysical research 113:G02008-1-G02008-10. Marage, D., and J.-C. Gégout. 2009. Importance of soil nutrients in the distribution of forest communities on a large geographical scale. Global Ecology and Biogeography 18:88-97. McGill, W.B., and C.V. Cole. 1981. Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S and P through soil organic matter. Geoderma 26:267-286. McLean, E.O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. pp.199-224. In A.L. Page et.al. (eds.) Method of soil analysis, Part 2. Chemical and microbiology properties. Second edition. Agronomy Monograph 9. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, USA. Meentemeyer, V. 1978. Macroclimate and lignin control of decomposition rates. Ecology 59:465-472. Melillo, J.M., J.D. Aber, and J.M. Muratore. 1982. Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamic. Ecology 63:621-626. Miller, H.G. 1969. Nitrogen nutrition on the sands of Culbin Forest, Morayshire. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 20:417-419. Moore, I.D., R.B. Grayson, and A.R. Ladson. 1991. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrological Processes 5:3-30. Olsen, S.R., and L.E. Sommers. 1982. Phospherous. pp.403-430. In Method of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Second edition. Agronomy Monograph 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA. Ordoñez, J.C., P.M.v. Bodegom, J.-P.M. Witte, I.J. Wright, P.B. Reich, and R. Aerts. 2009. A global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility. Global Ecology and Biogeography 18:137-149. Pastor, J., and W.M. Post. 1986. Influence of climate, soil moisture, and succession on forest carbon and nitrogen cycles. Biogeochemistry 2:3-27. Perroni-Ventura, Y., C. Montaña, and F. García-Oliva. 2006. Relationship between soil nutrient availability and plant species richness in a tropical semi-arid environment. Journal of Vegetation Science 17:719-728. Phillips, J.D., A.V. Turkington, and D.A. Marion. 2008. Weathering and vegetation effects in early stages of soil formation. Catena 72:21-28. Pueyo, Y., C.L. Alados, M. Maestro, and B. Komac. 2007. Gypsophile vegetation patterns under a range of soil properties induced by topographical position. Plant Ecology 189:301-311. Rhoades, J. D. 1996. Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. pp. 417-435. In D.L. Sparks et.al. (eds.) Method of soil analysis, Part 3. Chemical methods. Agronomy Monograph 9. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, USA. Sharma, B.D., S.S. Mukhopadhyay, and P.S. Sidhu. 1998. Microtopographic controls on soil formation in the Punjab region, India. Geoderma 81:357-368. Sollins, P. 1998. Factors influencing species composition in tropical lowland rain forest: Does soil matter? Ecology 79:23-30. Solon, J., M. Degórski, and E. Roo-Zielińska. 2007. Vegetation response to a topographical-soil gradient. Catena 71:309-320. Takyu, M., S.I. Aiba, and K. Kitayama. 2002. Effects of topography on tropical lower montane forests under different geological conditions on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Plant Ecology 159:35-49. Tenney, F.G., and S.A. Waksman. 1929. Composition of natural organic materials and their decomposition in the soil: IV. The nature and rapidity of decomposition of the various organic complexes in different plant materials, under aerobic conditions. Soil Science 28:55-84. Thomas, G.W. 1982. Exchangeable cations. pp.159-166. In Method of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Second edition. Agronomy Monograph 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA. Tsui, C.C., Z.S. Chen, and C.F. Hsieh. 2004. Relationships between soil properties and slope position in a lowland rain forest of southern Taiwan. Geoderma 123:131-142. Vinton, M.A., and I.C. Burke. 1995. Interactions between individual plant species and soil nutrients status in shortgrass steppe. Ecology 76:1116-1133. Vitousek, P.M., and R.L. Sanford. 1986. Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17:137-167. Walkley, A. and I.A. Black. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determing soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37:29-38. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22216 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 地形會影響植被的組成及土壤的化育,而植被經由吸收土壤中的養分並以有機物的形式散布到地表,同樣也會影響土壤之性質。土壤為植物生長所處的環境因子之一,其藉由影響植物之生理造成地上部植被之組成及結構之差異。若能對土壤特性之空間分布有所了解,我們便能從土壤的角度去更進一步的瞭解森林之空間結構。蓮華池25 公頃闊葉林長期動態樣區設置目的為探討台灣典型低海拔森林的組織結構,而本研究的目的則在建立此永久樣區內的土壤基本性質資料,並探討試驗區內土壤性質的變異與地形及植被間的關係。試驗以60 m × 60 m 的網格為採樣之單位,將樣區劃為64個採樣單位,另於試驗區西方以 30 m × 30 m 劃設 24 個網格進行更密集的採樣。之後以不同的地形位置 (稜線、坡地、溪溝) 及植被類型對採樣網格進行分組,進行各種土壤性質之統計分析與比較。土壤基本性質在研究樣區之空間分佈預測則利用地理統計方法之克利金法。
不同地形位置的比較中,土壤pH與可交換性鹽基在溪溝顯著較高,應為水分受地形的影響將被淋洗之離子帶至溪溝處累積的結果。有機碳在稜線顯著較高,可能為枯落物性質、微氣候等因子影響有機物分解速率而導致有機碳累積。不同植被類型間的比較則顯示生長於溪溝附近之植被類型 3 (大葉楠-石柃舅型)、植被類型4 (香桂-厚殼桂-狗骨仔型) 之土壤有較高的pH、可交換性鹽基、KCl extractable NH4+、可礦化氮及Mehlich K,顯示植被特性亦可能影響土壤性質。0-5 公分表土性質主成分分析結果顯示第一主成分 (可代表土壤養分) 與第二主成分 (可代表pH、有機碳) 兩者共可解釋約百分之七十七的總變異。從biplot可發現Mehlich K等土壤養分含量較低的採樣點多位於植被類型 1 (小葉赤楠-南投石櫟型)、植被類型2 (鵝掌柴-厚殼桂型) 所生長的區域,有機碳含量較高之樣點則多位於稜線上。由分析結果可確定土壤特性會隨不同地形位置及不同植被類型而改變,但由於地形會同時影響植被與土壤特性,土壤會影響植被分布,而植被又會影響土壤性質,因此最主要影響土壤特性之因子仍難以釐清。另外Bray No. 1 P以之60公尺為間距的分析結果發現空間相依性差,顯示在本試驗區Bray No. 1 P需做更密集的採樣 (如以30 m × 30 m 作為採樣單位) 才能獲得較佳的空間推估。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Topography is one of the factors that affect both vegetation compositions and soil formation, and the vegetation type also influence the soil chemical characteristics for nutrient uptake and release in soil system. The soil can affect the plant species composition and structure types of a forest ecosystem which was produced by the differences of plant physiology. If we can understand the spatial variability and spatial patterns of soil characteristics, we would further understand the forest structure at a watershed level. One of the purposes of establishing Lienhuachih 25 ha dynamic plot in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest is to analyze the forest structure. The objectives of this study were to establish the database of soil properties and to examine the relationships between the soil properties, landscape positions and vegetation types in the dynamic plot. The 25 ha plot was divided into 64 subplot for soil sampling. Each subplot was 60 m × 60 m in area and another 24 subplot was 30 m × 30 m in area in order to test different sampling methods located at the western area of plot. The study area was also divided into 3 different topographic positions and four vegetation types to compare the differences of soil properties at different topographic positions and among different vegetation types. The prediction of soil characteristics in the whole plot was conducted by Ordinary Kriging method of Geostatistics technique.
The results showed that soil pH and exchangeable cations were higher in gully, which revealed that landscape positions can affect the soil properties by redistribution of water and soluble soil nutrients. Organic carbon content was higher on the ridge which was the result of slow decomposition rate caused by microclimate or leaf residual properties. KCl extractable NH4+, mineralizable N, Mehlich K, exchangeable cations, and pH had significant differences between different vegetation types which indicated that vegetation type also can affect the soil properties in the plot. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that PCA-1 factor (soil fertility) and PCA-2 factor (pH and organic carbon content) together can explain near 77% of total soil variability. Vegetation type 1 and 2 had lower soil fertility but higher organic carbon content in the ridge of plot than other vegetation types. We still cannot confirm the main factor to control the spatial variation of soil properties in this dynamic plot because the complicate relationships between soil characteristics, landscape position and vegetation types in the study area. For the estimation of spatial distribution of soil properties in the study area based on the grid sampling distance, 60 m × 60 m in area, the prediction of soil characteristics by Geostatistics method for soil pH, soil organic matter content, KCl extractable NH4+, mineralizable N, Mehlich K, and exchangeable cations, are acceptable, but the Bray No. 1 P showed that we need more denser sampling distance, such as 30 m × 30 m in area, to get more reliable database in this study plot. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:13:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97623017-1.pdf: 4486142 bytes, checksum: 2056e093b87b8d7efbee168962c1a70c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要Ⅰ
英文摘要Ⅲ 目錄Ⅴ 表目錄Ⅷ 圖目錄Ⅹ 附表目錄XII 第一章 前言1 1.1土壤生成的因子1 1.2 土壤與地形的關係1 1.3土壤與植被的關係2 1.4 研究目的3 第二章 研究區域概述4 2.1 地理位置4 2.2 地質與土壤4 2.3 氣候特性8 2.4 植群生態8 第三章 材料與方法11 3.1 土壤性質11 3.1.1 土壤樣品的採集11 3.1.2 實驗室分析11 3.2 資料分析16 3.2.1 地形資料16 3.2.2 依不同地形與值被分不區分之採樣網格土壤性質彙整與比較分析16 3.2.3 統計分析16 3.2.4 土壤性質之空間分布17 第四章 結果與討論18 4.1 蓮華池25 ha 動態樣區之土壤基本性質18 4.2 蓮華池25 ha 動態樣區土壤性質之空間分布18 4.2.1 土壤pH23 4.2.2 電導度26 4.2.3 有機碳26 4.2.4 有效性氮、磷、鉀與可礦化氮33 4.2.5可交換性鹽基44 4.2.6 綜合討論44 4.3 不同地形位置的土壤性質差異53 4.3.1 土壤pH與電導度值53 4.3.2 有機碳53 4.3.3 有效性氮、磷、鉀與可礦化氮58 4.3.4 可交換性鹽基58 4.3.5 綜合討論63 4.4 不同植被類型的土壤性質差異69 4.4.1 土壤pH與電導度值69 4.4.2 有機碳69 4.4.3 有效性氮、磷、鉀與可礦化氮69 4.4.4 可交換性鹽基75 4.4.5 綜合討論83 4.5主成分分析 (PCA)83 4.5.1 土壤性質之主成分分析83 4.5.2 合併土壤與地形資料之主成分分析86 4.5.3 Biplot86 第五章 結論94 參考文獻95 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 蓮華池25公頃闊葉林長期動態樣區土壤性質之空間變異 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Spatial Variation of Soil Properties in the Lienhuachih 25 ha Dynamic Plot in a Subtropical Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 譚鎮中,謝長富 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 蓮華池25公頃闊葉林長期動態樣區,土壤性質,地形位置,植被類型,主成分分析,地理統計法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Lienhuachih 25 ha dynamic plot,Soil property,Topographic position,Vegetation type,Principal component analysis (PCA),Geostatistics, | en |
dc.relation.page | 107 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業化學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業化學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.38 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。