請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21926
標題: | 八大工業國及臺灣與中國研究補助狀況及研究影響力探討 An Analysis of Research Funding and Research Impact in G8 Countries, Taiwan and China |
作者: | Mei-Jhen Huang 黃玫溱 |
指導教授: | 黃慕萱 |
關鍵字: | 研究補助,研究補助機構,研究影響力,書目計量分析,八大工業國, Research Funding,Funding Agency,Research Impact,Bibliometric Analysis,G8, |
出版年 : | 2018 |
學位: | 博士 |
摘要: | 本研究分析美國、英國、法國、德國、日本、義大利、加拿大、俄羅斯等八大工業國,及臺灣與中國之研究補助狀況及研究影響力,從Web of Science資料庫蒐集十國2009至2014年出版之農業、臨床醫學、工程、生命科學及自然科學領域論文,獲研究補助論文共3,083,105篇,未獲研究補助論文共1,526,415篇。
研究結果顯示,各國皆有超過半數論文獲得研究補助,研究補助率呈現成長趨勢,尤其法國、德國及英國成長幅度較大。研究補助論文數最高為美國及中國,兩國亦為研究補助出超大國,其中美國國家科學基金會和中國國家自然科學基金委員會是主要跨國多補助機構。此外,美國與許多國家合作研究關係密切,臺灣跨國合著強度最高國家也是美國。各領域研究補助率則以生命科學領域最高,臨床醫學領域最低。 在研究影響力方面,各國及各領域之獲研究補助論文,其研究影響力均高於未獲研究補助論文,且合著與研究影響力有關,獲研究補助跨國合著論文影響力高於獲研究補助國內合著論文,各研究補助機構類型則以企業補助研究影響力較佳。此外,比較各國研究補助率及研究補助影響力,英國研究補助率偏低,但研究影響力高;中國與臺灣則是研究補助率高,但研究影響力低,研究成果還待提升。 This study analyzed the journal articles from the G8 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States), Taiwan and China to identify the distribution of research funding, funding agencies and research impact. The research data was collected from Web of Science database and the subject fields were limited to agriculture, clinical medicine, engineering, life sciences, and natural sciences. 3,083,105 funded articles and 1,526,415 unfunded articles published between 2009 and 2014 were used. The results showed that over half of all research articles in all countries received research funding, and the funded paper ratios increased each year. The United States and China had the highest number of funded papers, and both countries had a sponsorship surplus with other countries. In addition, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) were the major multifunding agencies. Furthermore, life sciences had the highest proportion of funded papers among the field’s total paper output, while clinical medicine had the lowest funded paper ratio. Regarding the research impact, the average number of citations per funded paper was almost two times the number of unfunded paper, with statistically significant difference observed. The average number of citations for international collaborative funded papers was more than for internal collaborative ones. Among five types of funding agencies, industry-funded papers were cited most often. In addition, China and Taiwan had high funding ratios, while receiving low average citation counts per funded paper, in contrast to the United Kingdom. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21926 |
DOI: | 10.6342/NTU201803881 |
全文授權: | 未授權 |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.09 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。