請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21797
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林照真 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林儀 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:47:14Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-02-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-01-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文文獻
MYGOPEN|這是假消息(2017.09.15)。〈【假知識】軍公教魔鬼藏在其中?在職軍公教減薪12%?別再相信 LINE 和 FB 謠言了!〉。上網日期:2017年12月10日,取自http://www.mygopen.com/2017/09/12-line-fb.html 大紀元(2018.07.22)。〈年改假新聞充斥 蔡英文:盼民眾不要被誤導〉。上網日期:2018年8月15日,取自http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/18/7/22/n10581345.htm 中央社(2016.07.19)。〈Facebook臺灣活躍用戶達1800萬戶〉。上網日期:2018年1月20日,取自http://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201607190264-1.aspx 丘采薇(2017.07.20)。〈「滅香」謠言多 蔡英文怒:內政部長為何沒出來澄清?〉,《聯合新聞網》。上網日期:2017年11月23日,取自https://udn.com/news/story/6656/2593812 自由時報(2018.06.27)。〈年改假新聞充斥 陳建仁:造成政府很大困擾〉。上網日期:2018年8月15日,取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/1067877 何欣潔、李映昕(2017.07.24)。〈香火戰爭:假新聞、假假新聞與中國因素〉,《端傳媒》。上網日期:2017年9月15日,取自https://theinitium.com/article/no-incense-stick-china/ 何穎怡譯(2001)。《探索新聞:美國報業社會史》。臺北市:遠流出版社。(原書Schudson, M. [1978]. Discovering the news: a social history of American newspapers. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.) 宋瑛堂譯(2013)。《搜尋引擎沒告訴你的事》。臺灣:左岸文化。(原書Pariser, E. [2011]. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. UK: Penguin.) 李品葭(2011)。〈動新聞動了什麼:談動新聞的新聞類型及感官類型運用策略〉,「2011中華傳播學會年會暨學術研討會」論文,臺灣,新竹。 周偉航(2016)。《做個‧真選民―選舉工程48講》,頁134。香港城市大學出版社。 林宇玲(2014)。〈網路與公共領域: 從審議模式轉向多元公眾模式〉,《新聞學研究》,118:55-85。 林昀嫻(2017.12.12)。〈假新聞氾濫/川普口頭禪 成政治人物擋箭牌〉,《經濟日報》。上網日期:2017年12月13日,取自https://www.udn.com/news/story/6812/2869553 柯舜智(2018.11.02)。〈SMCRE 揪社群平臺不實訊息〉,《聯合新聞網》。上網日期:2018年11月3日,取自 https://udn.com/news/story/11321/3456334 胡光夏、陳竹梅(2012)。〈社群媒體與軍事公共關係〉,《復興崗學報》,102:65-89。 唐維敏譯(1996)。《大眾傳播研究方法─質化取向》。臺北市:五南。(原書Jankowski, N. W., & Jensen, K. B. (Eds.). [1991]. A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research. London: Routledge. 夏春祥(1997)。〈文本分析與傳播研究〉,《新聞學研究》,54:141-166。 徐小童、馬弘高、李懷濛(2016.11.10)。〈美國民調都錯了,而中國的二次元世界猜到了結局〉,《端傳媒》。上網日期:2017年12月10日,取自https://theinitium.com/article/20161110-mainland-uselection/ 馬自明(200)。《閱聽人對媒體的信任關係研究:以「腳尾飯事件」為例》。臺灣大學新聞研究所學位論文。 張天雄(2012)。〈政府以置入性行銷及假新聞做為公關新聞形式之研究〉。《復興崗學報》,102:173-196。 張讚國(2013)。《匆促的記者:公民新聞、媒體與社會》。香港城市大學出版社。 許凱玲(2012.10.30)。〈珊迪颶風襲紐約,社群媒體流傳的七張超夯「假」照片〉,《數位時代》。上網日期:2018年1月20日,取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/25197/BN-ARTICLE-25197 許禎元(2003)。〈內容分析法的研究步驟與在政治學領域的應用〉,《師大政治論叢》。國立臺灣師範大學。 陳正芬譯(2014)。《演算法統治世界》。臺北:行人。(原書Steiner, C. [2012]. Automate This: How Algorithms Came to Rule Our World. New York: Portfolio.) 陳君毅(2016.11.29)。〈假新聞之王:因為有我,川普才能當選美國總統〉,《科技報橘》。上網日期:2017年12月10日,取自https://buzzorange.com/techorange/2016/11/29/fake-news-makes-isa-president/ 陳炳宏(2018.09.19)。〈陳炳宏:大阪事件是假新聞嗎?〉,《蘋果日報》。上網日期:2018年10月1日,取自https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20180919/1432208/ 陳順孝(2007)。〈網路巨變前夕的媒體數位化實驗: 在全民媒體浪潮中回應和延伸許瓊文教授的創新研究〉,《中華傳播學刊》。11:49-57。 曾薏蘋(2017.07.20)。〈眾神周日上凱道 綠營忙滅火〉,《中時電子報》。上網日期:2018年3月10日,取自http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20170720000558-260107 游美惠(2000)。〈內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用〉。《調查研究—方法與應用》,8:5-42 游梓翔、吳韻儀譯(1994)。《人類傳播史》,頁256-257。臺北市:遠流。(原書Schramm, W. [1988]. The Story of Human Communication. New York: Harper & Row.) 黃維明譯(2002)。《Republic.com——網路會顛覆民主嗎?》。臺北市:新新聞。(原書Sunstein, C. [2001]. Republic.com. Princeton University Press.) 葉元之(2004)。《公共關係與競選策略 : 2004大選連宋總部新聞發布實例研究》。臺北市 : 秀威資訊。 董素蘭、顧淑馨譯(2011)。《新聞學 實務與原理》。臺北市:學富文化。(原書Harcup, T. [2009]. Journalism: principles and practice. London: Sage.) 資策會(2017.05.01)。〈八成以上臺灣人愛用Facebook、Line坐穩社群網站龍頭 1人平均擁4個社群帳號 年輕人更愛YouTube和IG〉,《資策會FIND/經濟部技術處「資策會FIND(2016)/ 服務系統體系驅動新興事業研發計畫(2/4)》。上網日期:2018年1月1日,取自https://www.iii.org.tw/Press/NewsDtl.aspx?nsp_sqno=1934&fm_sqno=14 端傳媒(2015.08.08)。〈美國名嘴史超活告別《每日秀》〉。上網日期:2018年1月1日,取自https://theinitium.com/article/20150807-dailynews-etc-2/ 端傳媒(2016.12.06)。〈假新聞引發真槍擊案:美國男子襲擊披薩店,自稱調查希拉莉「性侵兒童案」〉。上網日期:2017年12月17日,取自https://theinitium.com/article/20161205-dailynews-us-fake-news/ 潘昌志(2017.11.07)。〈跨年夜的捷運改變了地球磁場?那真是比萬磁王還要狂啊!〉,《PanSci 泛科學》。上網日期:2017年12月9日,取自http://pansci.asia/archives/author/wayne 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2015.11.13)。〈網路流傳「十大致癌食物黑名單」,請問是真的嗎?〉,《食藥闢謠專區》。上網日期:2017年12月9日,取自https://www.fda.gov.tw/tc/newsContent.aspx?id=19255&chk=a89ff51d-f964-4a62-8b9b-2bf06cfff7f1 獨立媒體(2017.04.15)。〈迎戰「後真相」——新聞專業把關與媒體生態再造〉。上網日期:2017年12月20日,取自https://www.inmediahk.net/node/1048889 蕭維傑、王維菁(2018)。〈動態消息演算法、能見度、與新聞經營:以 Facebook平臺為例〉,《資訊社會研究》,34:63-104。 鍾麗華(2017.01.03)。〈中國製造假新聞 干擾臺灣施政〉,《自由時報》。上網日期:2017年9月15日,取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/1067877 羅世宏、童靜蓉(2014)。《社交媒體與新聞業》,頁185-197。臺北市:優質新聞發展協會。 蘇蘅(2017.10.24)。〈當媒體不重視採訪「真新聞」〉,《聯合新聞網》。上網日期:2017年12月20日,取自 https://www.udn.com/news/story/7341/2774544 二、英文文獻 Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-36. Balmas, M. (2012). When fake news becomes real. Communication Research, 41(3): 430-454. Barthel, M., Mitchell, A., & Holcomb, J. (2016). Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion. Pew Research Center Journalism & Media. Retrieve October 12, 2017, from http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/ Benkler, Y., Faris, R., Roberts, H., & Zuckerman, E. (2017). Study: Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Review, 3. Retrieved January 31, 2018, from http://www.cjr.org/analysis/breitbart-media-trump-harvard-study.php Boorstin, D. J. (1961). The image: A guide to pseudo-events in America. New York: Vintage. Cantril, H. (1940). The invasion from Mars: A study in the psychology of panic. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. Chadwick P. (2017.05.12). Defining fake news will help us expose it. The Guardian. Retrieve January 15, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/media/commentisfree/2017/may/12/defining-fake-news-will-help-us-expose-it Cohen, B. C. (2015). Press and foreign policy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Dewey, C. (2016.11.17). Facebook fake-news writer: ‘I think Donald Trump is in the White House because of me’. Washington Post. Retrieve December 13, 2017, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/11/17/facebook-fake-news-writer-i-think-donald-trump-is-in-the-white-house-because-of-me/?utm_term=.e69c621adcf9 DuChene, C. (2016.11.21). Is fake news the 2016 version of yellow journalism? Retrieve September 28, 2017, from https://www.theodysseyonline.com/fake-news-2016-version-yellow-journalism Edson. C., Tandoc Jr, Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2017). Defining “Fake News” A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137-153. Fake news. (2017). Collins English Dictionary. Retrieve December 11, 2017, from https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/fake-news Fake news. (2017). Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieve December 11, 2017, from http://www.oed.com/ Fernández-Luque, L., & Bau, T. (2015). Health and social media: perfect storm of information. Healthcare Informatics Research, 21(2): 67-73. Fisher, M. (2012.10.30). A viral, fake Hurricane Sandy photo migrates to China. The Washington Post. Retrieve January 15, 2018, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2012/10/30/a-viral-fake-hurricane-sandy-photo-migrates-to-china/?utm_term=.db9b20ebab3a Flood, A. (2017.11.02). Fake news is 'very real' word of the year for 2017. The Guardian. Retrieve December 2, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/nov/02/fake-news-is-very-real-word-of-the-year-for-2017 Gupta, A., Lamba, H., Kumaraguru, P., & Joshi, A. (2013). Faking sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on twitter during hurricane sandy. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, 729-736. Holpuch, A. (2012.10.30). Hurricane Sandy brings storm of fake news and photos to New York. The Guardian. Retrieve January 15, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/us-news-blog/2012/oct/30/hurricane-sandy-storm-new-york Jackson, J. (2016.11.13). Mark Zuckerberg vows more action to tackle fake news on Facebook. The Guardian. Retrieve December 20, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/13/mark-zuckerberg-vows-more-action-to-tackle-fake-news-on-facebook Jamieson, K. H., & Campbell, K. K. (1997). The interplay of influence: News, advertising, politics, and the mass media. Belmont: Wadsworth. Kang, H., Bae, K., Zhang, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2011). Source cues in online news: Is the proximate source more powerful than distal sources? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(4): 719-736. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1): 59-68. Kershner, J. W. (2011). Elements of News Writing. Pearson Higher Ed. Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2007). The elements of journalism: What news people should know and the public should expect. New York: Three Rivers Press. Lazer, D., Baum, M., Grinberg, N., Friedland, L., Joseph, K., Hobbs, W., & Mattsson, C. (2017). Combating fake news: An agenda for research and action. Harvard Kennedy School, Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, 2. Lee, Y. N. (2018.01.17). Trump and GOP attack CNN, New York Times and Washington Post in 'fake news awards'. CNBC. Retrieve January 20, 2018, from https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/17/fake-news-awards-by-donald-trump-gop-cnn-new-york-times-washington-post.html Levy, D. (1989). What public relations can do better than advertising. Public Relations Quarterly, 34(3): 7. Lilienfeld, S. O., Ammirati, R., & Landfield, K. (2009). Giving debiasing away: Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4): 390-398. Love, R. (2007). Before Jon Stewart. Columbia Journalism Review, 45(6): 33-37. Maheshwari, S. (2016). How fake news goes viral: a case study. The New York Times. Retrieve January 20, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/business/media/how-fake-news-spreads.html?_r=0. Malik, K. (2016.12.06). All the fake news that was fit to print. The New York Times. Retrieve September 28, 2017, from https://cn.nytimes.com/opinion/20161206/all-the-fake-news-that-was-fit-to-print/dual/ Marchi, R. (2012). With Facebook, blogs, and fake news, teens reject journalistic “objectivity”. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36(3): 246-262. McBeth, M. K., & Clemons, R. S. (2011). Is fake news the real news? The Stewart/Colbert Effect: Essays on the Real Impacts of Fake News. Retrieve September 28, 2017, from https://books.google.com.tw/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=9Yj2xromWW4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA79&dq=fake+news,+definition&ots=7yMMxh70Bw&sig=d8c2XurL0mIfJLSHd-8y7FfAXfk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=fake%20news%2C%20definition&f=false Menczer, F. (2016). The spread of misinformation in social media. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, 717. Metcalfe S. (2017.05.30). How to safeguard science in an era of fake news. The Guardian. Retrieve January 15, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2017/mar/30/how-to-safeguard-science-in-an-era-of-fake-news Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Digital News Report 2017. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieve January 31, 2017, from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital%20News%20Report%202017%20web_0.pdf Nope Francis. (2016.07.10). Snopes. Retrieve December 15, 2017, from https://www.snopes.com/pope-francis-donald-trump-endorsement/ Novak, M. (2015.12.14). 76 Viral images from 2015 that were totally fake. Gizmodo. Retrieve January 20, 2018, from https://gizmodo.com/76-viral-images-from-2015-that-were-totally-fake-1747317711 O'Reilly, T. (2005.09.30). Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved January 20, 2018, from http://tim.oreilly.com/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html Parkinson, H. J. (2016.11.14). Click and elect: how fake news helped Donald Trump win a real election. The Guardian. Retrieve December 2, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/14/fake-news-donald-trump-election-alt-right-social-media-tech-companies Premature Litigation. (2016.11.04). Snopes. Retrieve December 15, 2017, from https://www.snopes.com/homeland-security-indicts-hillary/ Richardson, B. (2006). The Process of Writing News: From Information to Story. Allyn & Bacon. Shavit, N. (2016.11.29). Data on Facebook’s fake news problem. Jumpshot Tech Blog. Retrieve December 12, 2017, from https://www.jumpshot.com/data-facebooks-fake-news-problem/ Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Fake news detection on social media: a data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 19(1): 22-36. Silverman, C. (2016.11.17). This analysis shows how fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. BuzzFeed. Retrieve September 28, 2017, from https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outpe rformed-real-news-on-facebook. Silverman, C., & Singer-Vine, J. (2016.12.06). Most Americans who see fake news believe it, new survey says. BuzzFeed. Retrieve September 28, 2017, from https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/fake-news-survey. Spohr, D. (2017). Fake news and ideological polarization: filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media. Business Information Review, 34(3), 150-160. Statista. (2018). Global social networks ranked by number of users 2018. Retrieve January 31, 2017, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ Thorson, E. (2008). Changing patterns of news consumption and participation. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4): 473-489. Titcomb, J., & Carson, J. (2017.03.16). What is fake news? Its origins and how it grew in 2016. The Telegraph. Retrieve October 12, 2017, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/0/fake-news-origins-grew-2016/ Townsend, T. (2016.11.21). The bizarre truth behind the biggest pro-Trump Facebook hoaxes. Inc. http://www. inc.com/tess-townsend/ending-fed-trump-facebook.html. US 'fake news' kingpin Paul Horner found dead at 38. (2017.09.27). BBC News. Retrieve December 13, 2017, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41422827 Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. Wingfield, N., Isaac, M., & Benner, K. (2016.11.14). Google and Facebook take aim at fake news sites. The New York Times. Retrieve December 2, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/15/technology/google-will-ban-websites-that-host-fake-news-from-using-its-ad-service.html Woe Canada. (2016.08.08). Snopes. Retrieve December 15, 2017, from https://www.snopes.com/obama-moving-to-canada/ Wong, J. I. (2016.11.30). Almost all the traffic to fake news sites is from Facebook, new data show. The Medium. Retrieve December 2, 2017, from https://qz.com/848917/facebook-fb-fake-news-data-from-jumpshot-its-the-biggest-traffic-referrer-to-fake-and-hyperpartisan-news-sites/ Yellow journalism: The “fake news” of the 19th century (n.d.). The Public Domain Review. Retrieve September 28, 2017, from https://publicdomainreview.org/collections/yellow-journalism-the-fake-news-of-the-19th-century/ Zuckerberg, M. (2017.06.28). Facebook. Retrieve January 31, 2017, from https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10103831654565331 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21797 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 2016年美國總統大選假新聞氾濫,社群媒體的快速傳播更使假新聞議題備受關注。本論文以臺灣的滅香事件及年金改革議題為案例,採取文本分析法,觀察假新聞在相關臉書頁面的呈現型態,並分析臉書社群平台的運作機制如何影響假新聞的傳播。本論文發現,臉書上的假新聞常以合成圖的樣態出現,藉此包裝錯誤訊息,並達到揶揄諷刺時事的目的。這些經後製而更為生動的假新聞圖片,很容易就誤導其他使用者。此外,在傳播假新聞的過程中,發布者常採取聳動而吸睛的標題引人注意,因此更可能造成錯誤連結與認知。除了假新聞所呈現的內容本身具有吸引力,臉書的按讚、分享與轉貼等互動功能,也提高了假新聞的能見度。開放自由的社群平台本身即缺乏傳統資訊守門人,因此當錯誤訊息輾轉流傳到臉書時,該社群平台就像一間大型回聲室,假新聞便因社群媒體的演算法機制,不斷被複製和放大。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The discussion of fake news has caused wide concern around the world since the 2016 US presidential election. Many studies considered the phenomenon related to the operating mechanism of social media. Based on textual analysis, this paper analyzed fake news appeared on Facebook groups and fan pages related to Incense Reduction and Pension Reform. The aim of this paper is to observe the types of fake news and investigate the influence of the social media operating mechanism on the spread of fake news. Results show that fake news on Facebook often figure as a composite photo with fake narrations so as to present hoaxes or satires on current events. This kind of fake news is easy to conceal misinformation. On the other hand, sensational titles and unilaterally descriptions are being used to replace complicated issues or policies contents. This type of fake news is prone to misled users and influence their cognition toward the truth. Social media is a user-driven and community-oriented platform, but lack of information gatekeepers. Wrong messages will be easily copied and megaphoned continuously on Facebook because of the algorithm mechanism motivated by sharing, following, and clicking the Like button. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:47:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R04342020-1.pdf: 3054441 bytes, checksum: f3c2b8d46e4d2454dd7548f53b563e46 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii 目 錄 iii 圖目錄 iv 表目錄 v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究問題 9 第二章 文獻回顧 11 第一節 假新聞之內涵 11 第二節 假新聞與社群媒體的關係與效應 21 第三章 研究方法 31 第一節 文本分析法 31 第二節 研究對象 31 第四章 研究發現與分析 39 第一節 假新聞常以圖文合成方式呈現 39 第二節 錯誤標題有利於傳播假新聞 44 第三節 臉書成為假新聞的主要傳播管道 51 第五章 結論與建議 59 第一節 研究結論 59 第二節 研究限制與建議 63 參考文獻 67 中文文獻 67 英文文獻 72 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 探索假新聞:以滅香及年金改革事件為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring Fake News: Case Studies of Incense Reduction and Pension Reform. | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 胡元輝,蘇蘅 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 假新聞,社群媒體,臉書,滅香,年金改革, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Fake News,Social Media,Facebook,Incense Reduction,Pension Reform, | en |
dc.relation.page | 78 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900287 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-01-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.98 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。