Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 經濟學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21737
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor林惠玲
dc.contributor.authorChi-Ching Hoen
dc.contributor.author何季青zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T03:44:37Z-
dc.date.copyright2019-03-26
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2019-03-18
dc.identifier.citation石瑾睦(2009)。我國數位出版版權交易之探討。2009出版年鑑,471-479。
古芷諼(2017)。台灣出版產業發展現況與產業競爭優勢。台灣經濟研究月刊,40(7), 138-144。
台灣經濟研究院(2018)。105年臺灣出版產業調查(上冊)。臺北市:文化部。
台灣經濟研究院(2018)。105年臺灣出版產業調查暨106年閱讀及消費趨勢分析(下冊)。臺北市:文化部。
伍忠賢(2000)。企業轉型的策略方案抉擇。管理雜誌,314,106-110。
行政院主計處(2008)。95年工商及服務業普查報告。臺北市:行政院主計處。
行政院主計處(2013)。100年工商及服務業普查報告。臺北市:行政院主計處。
全國意向顧問(2012)。100年臺灣雜誌出版產業調查研究報告。臺北市:文化部。
林慈芳(2015)。國民所得統計新規範與經濟成長及其政策意涵。台灣經濟論衡,13(2), 94-119。
周文賢(1999)。行銷管理-市場分析與策略規劃。臺北市:智勝。
周佩萱(1992)。試析我國中小企業轉型困境。台灣經濟研究月刊,16(8),14-47。
張國雄(2004)。行銷管理。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
陳玉婷(2018)。2018年我國出版業分析。台灣經濟研究院產經資料庫。
陳明璋(1990)。企業贏的策略:掌握成功的四項關鍵:經理人、接棒、轉型、創新。臺北市:遠流。
陳雪華&林維萱(2009)。華文地區數位出版產業發展之探討:以臺灣和大陸為例。教育資料與圖書館學,46(2),267-292。
陳德釗&黃皇龍(2013)。數位出版業的經營模式:雙邊市場觀點。東吳經濟商學學報,82,93-109。
黃榮華(2016)。提振出版產業才能拯救未來臺灣經濟:寫在新政府上任的期許。全國新書資訊月刊,211,4-7。
Adams, J.D. (1984). Transforming Work. VA: Miles Review press.
Adrian, J.S. (1996). Value Migration: How to Think Several Moves Ahead of The Competition. Boston: The President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Ansoff, H.I. (1965). Corporate Strategy. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Bibeault, B.D. (1982). Corporate Turnaround: How Managers Turn Loser into Winners.Boston: Mcgrew-hill book company. Brown, S. T. and Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organizational Science, 2(1), 40-57.
Corrado, Carol A., Charles R. Hulten, and Daniel E.Sichel (2005). Measuring Capital and Technology: An Extended Framework, in Carol Corrado, John C. Haltiwanger and Daniel E. Sichel (eds), Measuring Capital in the New Economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 11-46.
Corrado, Carol A., Charles R. Hulten, and Daniel E.Sichel (2009). Intangible Capital and U.S. Economic Growth. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 661-685.
D’Aveni, R.A. (1994). Hyper competition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. New York: The Free Press.
Donald, N.S. (1999). Why Good Companies Go Bad. Harvard Business Review, Boston; Jul/Aug, 77(4), 42-51.
Drucker, P.F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. London: Heinemann.
Edvinsson, L. and M.S. Malone (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower. New York: Harper Business.
Hamel, G. and C.K. Prahalad (1994). Competing of the Future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 224-236.
Newell, S. and Swan J. (1995). Professional Associations as Important Mediators of the Innovation Process. Science Communication,16(4),371-387.
Ooi, T. W. M. (2010). Exploring the key success factors of Organization Transformation, Faculty of Management, Multimedia University Malaysia.
Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating andSustaining Superior Performance. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Reinhilde, V. and Bruno C. (1999). Make and Buy in Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing Firms. Research Policy, 28(1), 63-80.
Robbin, S.P. (1998). Organizational behavior: Leading and managing in Australia and New Zealand Sydney: Prentice Hall Australia Pty Ltd. problem. World Future Society, 35(3), 24-27.
Robertson, T.S. (1967). The Process of Innovation and the Diffusion of Innovation.Journal of Marketing, 31(1), 14-19.
Shocker, A.D. Srivastava R.K. and Ruekert R. W. (1994). Challenges and Opportunities Facing and Brand Management: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 149-158.
Urabe, K., Child, J., and Kagono, T. (1998). Innovation and management: International comparisons Vol.13. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
van Ark, J.X. Hao, C.A. Corrado and Hulten (2009).Measuring Intangible Capital and Its Contribution to Economic Growth in Europe, European Investment Bank (EIB) Paper, No.3.
Yang, C.H., Motohashi, K., and Chen, J.R. (2009). Are new technology-based Firms located on science parks really more innovative?: Evidence from Taiwan. ResearchPolicy,38(1), 77-85.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21737-
dc.description.abstract近年來電腦科技的大躍進,網際網路的普及,資訊產品的進步將民眾帶入數位化時代,國人閱讀習慣逐漸改變,傳統印刷出版品不再能滿足消費者需求,出版模式走向轉變是必定的發展趨勢。有鑑於其他文獻多半著重於數位出版或是單一經營策略之研究,較無概括的產業輪廓及整體出版業的發展,本文使用行政院主計總處2006年及2011年工商及服務業普查資料之出版產業為研究樣本,實證時採用Probit Model雙元模型的計量方法,探討:出版產業的總體市場概況,出版業者轉型之無形投資發展情形,影響企業採取轉型之無形投資策略的因素。
主要研究發現:(1)無論在無形投資家數占比或無形投資總金額占比上,出版業者對於無形投資策略以市場行銷的實際投資最高。(2)企業之廠齡與利潤率對於是否進行無形投資的轉型決策影響已日漸不重要,但新進廠商比起舊廠仍較有意願於無形投資。(3)企業規模愈大的企業較有意願投資於研究發展、員工訓練與電腦軟體資料庫的轉型發展,對於市場行銷之無形投資決策影響較不顯著。(4)市占率較低的企業會進行較多的無形投資以搶攻市占率,尤其是研究發展之無形投資。(5)企業若進行國內的長期投資會特別考量無形投資,企業轉型發展之無形投資策略愈來愈重要,且無形投資決策間之相關性高。(6)企業若擁有自有品牌、國外長期投資、與國外進行服務或勞務交易在研究發展之無形投資上較有意願投資。
業者除了持續在市場行銷的無形投資外,也應提升其他無形投資占比,加強人力訓練培育相關人才,研發商品的優質化、差異化,並將商品推廣至海外,輔以政府之扶植政策,企業轉型以不被市場淘汰。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, the great leap forward of computer technology, the popularity of the Internet, the advancement of information products have brought people into the digital age, people's reading habits have gradually changed, and traditional printed publications can no longer meet consumer demand. The shift in the publishing model is an inevitable development trend. In view of the fact that other literatures mostly focus on digital publishing or single business strategy research, the paper uses the publishing industry of the Industry and Services Census from Directorate-General of Budget Department of the Executive Yuan in 2006 and 2011 as the research sample. The empirical method uses the measurement method of the Probit Model. To study: the overall market profile of the publishing industry, the development of intangible investment in the transformation of publishers, and the factors that influence the intangible investment strategy of enterprises to adopt Business Transformation.
The main research findings are: (1) Regardless of the proportion of investors or the total amount of intangible investment, publishers have the highest actual investment in intangible investment strategies for marketing. (2) The influence of the company's age and profit margin on the decision-making of intangible investment has become less important, but newcomers are still more willing to invest intangible than the old ones. (3) Companies with larger enterprise scales are more willing to invest in research and development, employee training and computer software database, and have no significant impact on the intangible investment decision-making of marketing. (4) Enterprises with low market share will carry out more intangible investment to seize market share, especially intangible investment in research and development. (5) If the enterprise conducts long-term domestic investment, it will consider intangible investment in particular, and the intangible investment strategy of Business Transformation is more and more important, and the correlation between intangible investment decisions is high. (6) Enterprises that have their own brands, long-term foreign investment, and foreign services or labor transactions are more willing to invest in the intangible investment of research and development.
In addition to continuing intangible investment in marketing, publishers should also increase the proportion of other intangible investments. Strengthen employee training to cultivate relevant talents, improve the quality and differentiation of R&D products, promote the products overseas, and supplemented by the government's policy. The publishers adopt Business Transformation to not be eliminated by the market.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:44:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-108-P05323012-1.pdf: 1263176 bytes, checksum: 9ec9be34c74979b658c985c6cbe2aa91 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2019
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 II
誌謝 III
中文摘要 IV
ABSTRACT V
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究目的與方法 3
1.3 研究架構 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1 企業轉型的定義與策略 5
2.2 影響企業轉型的因素 9
2.3 無形投資的定義、分類與影響因素 13
第三章 產業概況 17
3.1 台灣出版產業概況 17
3.2 台灣出版產業的轉型-無形投資概況 34
第四章 模型設定與變數說明 41
4.1 模型設定 41
4.2 變數選取與衡量 44
第五章 實證結果與分析 50
5.1 企業轉型之無形投資決策模型一PROBIT MODEL 50
5.2 企業轉型之無形投資決策模型二 MULTIVARIATE PROBIT MODEL 55
第六章 結論與建議 64
參考文獻 67
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title台灣出版業的轉型-無形投資策略之探討zh_TW
dc.titleThe Transformation of Taiwan's Publishing Industry: Empirical Study on Intangible Investment Strategyen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear107-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳正倉,李顯峰
dc.subject.keyword企業轉型,無形投資,出版業,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordBusiness Transformation,Intangible Investment,Publishing Industry,en
dc.relation.page70
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201900656
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2019-03-19
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept經濟學研究所zh_TW
Appears in Collections:經濟學系

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ntu-108-1.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.23 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved