請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21609
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 官晨怡(Chen-I Kuan) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ren Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林奕任 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:39:38Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-23 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-01-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分 王榮德主編(2020)。公共衛生學。臺北市:陳拱北預防醫學基金會。 白先勇(1999)。孽子。臺北市:允晨文化。 杜思誠(2008)。高風險的性?從男同志轟趴參與者的性實作檢視「多重性伴侶」的愛滋風險論述(碩士論文,國立臺灣大學社會學研究所)。 杜思誠(2014)。有關男同志娛樂性藥物性愛的一些工作經驗與思考。愛之關懷季刊,89,17-26。 沈榮宗(2016)。男同志網路聊天室交友自我介紹與感染愛滋病毒危險行為之相關(碩士論文,國立成功大學護理學研究所)。 李佳雯(2016)。是否暴露前預防性投藥可以間斷性使用?。愛之關懷季刊,94,49-52。 李蘭、晏涵文、陳富莉、陸玓玲、吳文琪、江宜珍(2010)。健康行為與健康教育。臺北市:巨流。 林純德(2009)。成為一隻「熊」:台灣男同志「熊族」的認同型塑與性/性別/身體展演。台灣社會研究期刊,76,57-117。 林怡亭(2012)。手機APP約砲成趨勢 愛滋防制難度更高。檢索自 https://tw.news.yahoo.com/手機app約砲成趨勢-愛滋防制難度更高-014500214.html(查閱 2020.02.22)。 林亞駿、蔣明翰(2016)。如何成為男同志?——從「熊/豬」之爭與「C/娘」。檢索自 http://cpaper-blog.blogspot.com/2016/09/c.html(查閱 2020.07.26)。 林冠丞(2017)。男同志手機交友軟體:身體意象與情慾展演的民族誌初探(碩士論文,高雄醫學大學性別研究所)。 林冠廷(2019)。論男同志交友 app 的機會與限制(碩士論文,國立政治大學社會學研究所)。 林明燊、張維倫、孫淑慧(2018)。暴露前預防性投藥對 HIV 感染控制的影響。感染控制雜誌,28(4),171-182。 吳佳原(1998)。城市荒漠中的綠洲:台北市男同志酒吧經驗分析(碩士論文,國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所)。 吳嘉苓、曾嬿芬(2006)。SARS 的風險治理:超越技術模型。台灣社會學,11,57-109。 邱伊翎(2006)。一個也不能少:台灣愛滋篩檢的風險治理。(碩士論文,國立清華大學社會學研究所)。 邱偉淳(2012)。男同志App交友的性別展演策略:霸權還是賦權?。2012 年中華傳播學會年會。中華傳播學會主辦,臺北市。 邱怡君(2013)。上網約一夜情 愛滋感染行動化。檢索自 https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/712390(查閱 2020.02.22)。 邱怡瑄主編(2017)。以進大同:臺北同志生活誌。臺北市:臺北文學發展基金會。 柯乃熒(2008)。網路、搖頭與性的交錯:青少年男同志感染HIV的風險。愛之關懷季刊,63,34-40。 柯乃熒(2011)。俱樂部藥物使用、網路尋性及HIV感染:男同性戀愛滋病預防之網路行為調查及介入措施(NSC 98-2314-B-006-053-MY2)(臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會)。 柯乃熒(2016)。從實證到政策制定—愛滋病毒暴露前口服預防性投藥。護理雜誌,63(6),18-22。 柯乃熒、鍾信心、章順仁、葛應欽、文榮光 (1995)。男同性戀、愛滋病威脅與性行為之探索研究。臺灣性學學刊,1(1),33-46。 柯乃熒、張瑞玲、陳佩佩(1999)。台灣地區 1986-1997 年間愛滋病相關研究議題之分析。第四屆性教育、性學、性別研究暨同性戀研究國際學術研討會。中央大學性/別研究室主辦,桃園市。 高夫曼(Erving Goffman)(1992)。日常生活中的自我表演(徐江敏等譯)。苗栗縣:桂冠圖書出版。 高夫曼(Erving Goffman)(2010)。污名——管理受損身分的筆記(曾凡慈譯)。新北市:群學。 陳志萍(2017)。男同志交友APP-9Monsters象徵圖形與照片之性別與身體展演。性別平等教育季刊,81,50-58。 陳品丞(2017)。開放還是忠誠?——初探男同志伴侶使用交友 app 的矛盾與協商。 2017 年臺灣社會學會年會。臺灣社會學會主辦,新北市。 莊苹(2018)。男同志的成長與藥/愛的糾結。東吳社會工作學報,34,69-85。 莊登閔、沈慶盈(2013)。在櫃子裡搖頭:青年男同志之用藥經驗與調適策略初探。臺大社會工作學刊,27,1-44。 張綜瑋、童玟津、黃春雅(2018)。愛滋暴露前預防性投藥。彰化護理,25(2),2-5。 黃士澤(2017)。年輕男性間性行為者對於愛滋病毒暴露前預防性投藥意圖與相關健康信念。愛之關懷季刊,99,25-36。 黃子柔(2019)。我們在微光中前進-男同志使用交友APP之困境與抉擇(碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學研究所)。 童伊迪、鍾道銓(2011)。同志轟趴參與者的實踐經驗與在地知識(DOH100‐DC‐1004)(臺北市:行政院衛生署疾病管制局)。 創市際(2018)。IX 市場解析:同志社群/交友 App 篇。創市際雙週刊。檢索自 https://www.ixresearch.com/reports/創市際雙週刊第ㄧO三期-20180214/(查閱 2020.02.22)。 感染誌(2020)。揭露第四個90成績單:接觸愛滋感染者焦慮感大調查真實呈現!。檢索自 https://hiv-story.org/2020/08/27/0827news/(查閱 2020.12.05)。 劉紹華(2013)。我的涼山兄弟:毒品、愛滋與流動青年。新北市:群學。 劉紹華(2020)。疫病與社會的十個關鍵詞。臺北市:春山出版。 蔡茂松(2012)。愛滋病毒暴露前預防性投藥指引及成效。愛之關懷季刊,81,22-31。 衛生福利部疾病管制署(2016)。愛滋防治第六期五年計畫。檢索自 https://www.cdc.gov.tw/File/Get/hG9uzlwre8PEq0P-KVT37A(查閱 2020.02.22)。 衛生福利部疾病管制署(2018)。107 年愛滋病毒篩檢與暴露愛滋病毒前預防性投藥(PrEP)計畫 。檢索自 https://www.cdc.gov.tw/File/Get/jhDzZX1wMs237pZVq3bMWw(查閱 2020.10.14)。 衛生福利部疾病管制署(2020)。HIV 月報 108-12。檢索自 https://www.cdc.gov.tw/File/Get/sWU9SQHOg6jUIreBuIhmvg(查閱 2020.02.22)。 賴正哲(2005)。去公司上班:新公園男同志的情慾空間。臺北市:女書文化。 賴安琪、林咏臻、黃彥芳、楊靖慧(2011)。臺灣年輕之男男間性行為者愛滋感染流行病學分析。愛之關懷季刊,76,8-19。 盧嬿任、林燕卿(2017)。網路約會(砲)與愛滋病防治。樹德人文社會電子報,13,60-68。 簡溥辰(2016)。哈囉,找什麼?臺灣男同志使用交友軟體的情況及影響因素(碩士論文,國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所)。 簡春安、鄒平儀(2016)。社會工作研究法。高雄市:巨流。 瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞主編(2015)。社會及行為科學研究法:質性研究法。臺北市:東華書局。 羅毓嘉(2010)。男柯一夢夢紅樓:西門紅樓南廣場的「同志市民空間」(碩士論文,國立臺灣大學新聞研究所)。 藍佩嘉、羅融(2005)。一個質性研究的誕生-以家務移工的研究為例。婦研縱橫,76,22-30。 顧文瑋(2016)。暴露前預防性投藥之進展與其可行性。愛之關懷季刊,94,39-48。 英文部分 Flood A. (2019). Opinion: How to achieve the 'fourth 90' for HIV. Retrieved from https://www.devex.com/news/sponsored/opinion-how-to-achieve-the-fourth-90-for-hiv-95638. Bradbury, J. (1989). The policy implications of differing concepts of risk. Science, Technology Human Values, 14(4), 380–99. Barreiro P. (2018). Hot News: Sexually Transmitted Infections on the Rise in PrEP Users. AIDS reviews, 20(1), 71. Belluz J. (2019). 5 reasons why 3 STDs are roaring back in America. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/9/27/16371142/stds-syphilis-gonorrhea-chlamydia. Bien, C. H., Best, J. M., Muessig, K. E., Wei, C., Han, L., Tucker, J. D. (2015). Gay Apps for Seeking Sex Partners in China: Implications for MSM Sexual Health. AIDS Behav, 19(6), 941-946. Balán, I. C., Carballo-Diéguez, A., Ventuneac, A., Remien, R. H., Dolezal, C., Ford, J. (2013). Are HIV-negative men who have sex with men and who bareback concerned about HIV infection? Implications for HIV risk reduction interventions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(2), 279–289. Beymer, M. R., Weiss, R. E., Bolan, R. K., Rudy, E. T., Bourque, L. B., Rodriguez, J. P., Morisky, D. E. (2014). Sex on demand: geosocial networking phone apps and risk of sexually transmitted infections among a cross-sectional sample of men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County. Sex Transm Infect, 90(7), 567-572. Corburn, J. (2005). Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cassels, S., Katz, D. A. (2013). Seroadaptation among men who have sex with men: emerging research themes. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep, 10(4), 305-313. Cao, B., Liu, C., Stein, G., Tang, W., Best, J., Zhang, Y., Yang, B., Huang, S., Wei, C., Tucker, J. D. (2017). Faster and Riskier? Online Context of Sex Seeking Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China. Sex Transm Dis, 44(4), 239-244. Dean, T. (2009). Unlimited Intimacy: Reflections on the Subculture of Barebacking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Dubov, A., Galbo, P., Jr, Altice, F. L., Fraenkel, L. (2018). Stigma and Shame Experiences by MSM Who Take PrEP for HIV Prevention: A Qualitative Study. American Journal of Men's Health, 12(6), 1843–1854. Fields, E. L., Morgan, A., Sanders, R. A., Jennings, J. (2017). “I Met Him On Jack’D” – Exploring HIV Risk Perceptions and Risk Mitigation Strategies of Young Black MSM Meeting Sex Partners on Geosocial Networking Apps. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60(2). Filice, E., Raffoul, A., Meyer, S. B., Neiterman, E. (2019). The influence of Grindr, a geosocial networking application, on body image in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: An exploratory study. Body Image, 31, 59-70. Frasca, T., Ventuneac, A., Balan, I., Carballo-Diéguez, A. (2012). Inner contradictions among men who bareback. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 946-956. Grosskopf, N. A., LeVasseur, M. T., Glaser, D. B. (2014). Use of the Internet and mobile-based 'apps' for sex-seeking among men who have sex with men in New York City. Am J Mens Health, 8(6), 510-520. Hong, H., Xu, J., McGoogan, J., Dong, H., Xu, G., Wu, Z. (2017). Relationship between the use of gay mobile phone applications and HIV infection among men who have sex with men in Ningbo, China: a cross-sectional study. Int JSTD AIDS, 29(5), 491-497. Holloway, I. W., Pulsipher, C. A., Gibbs, J., Barman-Adhikari, A., Rice, E. (2015). Network Influences on the Sexual Risk Behaviors of Gay, Bisexual and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men Using Geosocial Networking Applications. AIDS Behav, 19 Suppl 2, 112-122. Huang, P., Wu, H. J., Strong, C., Jan, F. M., Mao, L. W., Ko, N. Y., Li, C. W., Cheng, C. Y. Ku, S. W. W. (2019). Unspeakable PrEP: a qualitative study of sexual communication, problematic integration, and uncertainty management among men who have sex with men in Taiwan. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 47(6), 611-627. Hahn, H. A., You, D. S., Sferra, M., Hubbard, M., Thamotharan, S., Fields, S. A. (2017). Is it Too Soon to Meet? Examining Differences in Geosocial Networking App Use and Sexual Risk Behavior of Emerging Adults. Sexuality Culture, 22(1), 1-21. Ko, N. Y., Chen, B. J., Li, C. W., Ku, W. W., Hsu, S. T. (2016). Willingness to Self-Pay for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Men Who Have Sex With Men: A National Online Survey in Taiwan. AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education, 28(2), 128–137. Ko, N. Y., Koe, S., Lee, H. C., Yen, C. F., Ko, W. C., Hsu, S. T. (2012). Online sex-seeking, substance use, and risky behaviors in Taiwan: results from the 2010 Asia Internet MSM Sex Survey. Arch Sex Behav, 41(5), 1273-1282. Ko, N. Y., Tseng, P. C., Huang, Y. C., Chen, Y. C., Hsu, S. T. (2016). Seeking sex partners through the internet and mobile phone applications among men who have sex with men in Taiwan. AIDS Care, 28(7), 927-931. Ko, N. Y., Wu, H. J., Strong, C., Li, C. W., Ku, W. W., Hsu, S. T. (2018). Differences in awareness of and willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis and anticipated condom use among serodiscordant couples in Taiwan. AIDS care, 30(10), 1306–1310. Lupton D. (1993). Risk as moral danger: the social and political functions of risk discourse in public health. International Journal of Health Services: Planning, Administration, Evaluation, 23(3), 425–435. Lupton D. (1995). The Imperative of Health: Public Health and the Regulated Body. Sage Publications, Inc. Lupton D. (2013). Risk: Second Edition. London: Routledge. LeVasseur, M. T., Goldstein, N. D., Tabb, L. P., Olivieri-Mui, B. L., Welles, S. L. (2018). The Effect of PrEP on HIV Incidence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the Context of Condom Use, Treatment as Prevention, and Seroadaptive Practices. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 77(1), 31-40. Lehmiller, J. J., Ioerger, M. (2014). Social networking smartphone applications and sexual health outcomes among men who have sex with men. PLoS One, 9(1), e86603. Landovitz, R. J., Tseng, C. H., Weissman, M., Haymer, M., Mendenhall, B., Rogers, K., Veniegas, R., Gorbach, P. M., Reback, C. J., Shoptaw, S. (2012). Epidemiology, sexual risk behavior, and HIV prevention practices of men who have sex with men using GRINDR in Los Angeles, California. J Urban Health, 90(4), 729-739. Miller, B. (2015). “Dude, Where’s Your Face?” Self-Presentation, Self-Description, and Partner Preferences on a Social Networking Application for Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Content Analysis. Sexuality Culture, 19(4), 637-658. Newcomb, M. E., Mongrella, M. C., Weis, B., McMillen, S. J., Mustanski, B. (2016). Partner Disclosure of PrEP Use and Undetectable Viral Load on Geosocial Networking Apps: Frequency of Disclosure and Decisions About Condomless Sex. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 71(2), 200–206. Rubin, G. S. (1993). Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality. In Henry Abelove, Michèle Aina Barale and David M. Halperin (Eds), The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader (pp. 3-44). New York: Routledge. Tolley, E. E., Ulin, P. R., Mack, N., Robinson, E. T., Succop, S. M. (2016). Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Public Health. Tang, W., Best, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, F. Y., Tso, L. S., Huang, S., Yang, B., Wei, C., Tucker, J. D. (2016). Gay mobile apps and the evolving virtual risk environment: a cross-sectional online survey among men who have sex with men in China. Sex Transm Infect, 92(7), 508-514. Traeger, M. W., Cornelisse, V. J., Asselin, J., Price, B., Roth, N. J., Willcox, J., . . . Pr, E. P. X. S. T. (2019). Association of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis With Incidence of Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Individuals at High Risk of HIV Infection. JAMA, 321(14), 1380-1390. Phillips, G., Magnus, M., Kuo, I., Rawls, A., Peterson, J., Jia, Y., Opoku, J., Greenberg, A. E. (2014). Use of geosocial networking (GSN) mobile phone applications to find men for sex by men who have sex with men (MSM) in Washington, DC. AIDS Behav, 18(9), 1630-1637 Philpot, S., Prestage, G., Holt, M., Haire, B., Maher, L., Hammoud, M., Bourne, A. (2020). Gay and Bisexual Men's Perceptions of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in a Context of High Accessibility: An Australian Qualitative Study. AIDS Behav. Royal Society (1992). Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management. London: Royal Society. Rice, E., Holloway, I.,Winetrobe, H., Rhoades H., Barman-Adhikari, A., Gibbs J., Carranza, A., Dent, D., Dunlap, S. (2012). Sex Risk among Young Men who have Sex with Men who use Grindr, a Smartphone Geosocial Networking Application. Journal of AIDS Clinical Research, Suppl 4. Radfar, S. R., Rawson, R. A. (2014). Current research on methamphetamine: epidemiology, medical and psychiatric effects, treatment, and harm reduction efforts. Addiction Health, 6(3-4), 146–154. Shoptaw, S., Reback, C. J. (2007). Methamphetamine use and infectious disease-related behaviors in men who have sex with men: implications for interventions. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 102 Suppl 1, 130–135. Warner, M., Maestre, J. F., Gibbs, J., Chung, C.-F., Blandford, A. (2019). Signal Appropriation of Explicit HIV Status Disclosure Fields in Sex-Social Apps used by Gay and Bisexual Men. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19. Wei, L., Chen, L., Zhang, H., Yang, Z., Liu, S., Tan, W., Xie, W., Liu, L., Zhao, J., Cheng, J. (2019). Relationship between gay app use and HIV testing among men who have sex with men in Shenzhen, China: a serial cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 9(8), e028933. Wei, L., Chen, L., Zhang, H., Yang, Z., Zou, H., Yuan, T., Xiao, Y., Liu, S., Tan, W., Xie, W., Liu, L., Cheng, J. Zhao, J. (2019). Use of gay app and the associated HIV/syphilis risk among non-commercial men who have sex with men in Shenzhen, China: a serial cross-sectional study. Sex Transm Infect, 95(7), 496-504. Winetrobe, H., Rice, E., Bauermeister, J., Petering, R., Holloway, I. W. (2014). Associations of unprotected anal intercourse with Grindr-met partners among Grindr-using young men who have sex with men in Los Angeles. AIDS Care, 26(10), 1303-1308. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21609 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 根據臺灣衛生福利部疾病管制署(Taiwan Centers for Disease Control, Taiwan CDC)的統計資料,近年來,臺灣每年新增的愛滋感染者以年輕男性為主,主要危險因子是男性間的不安全性行為。與此同時,社群網站和手機交友軟體等虛擬空間已成為男同志社群中的主要交友管道,取代傳統的公園、酒吧及三溫暖等實體空間。先前的量化研究對於男同志手機交友軟體上的愛滋風險有不同的看法,同樣將交友軟體的使用者與未使用交友軟體者相比,有研究指出前者有較高的愛滋感染盛行率,亦有研究指出相反的結果,與使用者較可能採取降低風險的行為,例如較常使用保險套、進行愛滋篩檢等相關。在這樣看似矛盾的研究結果背後顯示,手機交友軟體為臺灣當代男同志社群帶來了更便捷的交友模式,能夠連結更廣大的虛擬社群的同時,是否也帶來某些隱憂? 本研究於 2020 年 4 月至 8 月間,透過半結構式深度訪談和參與式觀察,以立意抽樣與滾雪球抽樣的方式招募 15 位男同志手機交友軟體的使用者進行訪談,其中包含 11 位非愛滋感染者以及 4 位愛滋感染者,並在臺北市內使用 Hornet 和 Grindr 兩款交友軟體進行參與式觀察。本研究以「男同志使用手機軟體交友如何增加/減低男同志感染愛滋或遭逢愛滋污名的風險?」作為問題意識,探索以男同志為主的男性間性行為者在交友軟體上遭逢了怎樣的愛滋風險環境?在這樣的風險環境中,男同志有怎樣不同的認知?男同志在使用交友軟體的實作過程中,發展出了怎樣的策略,來面對可能遭遇的愛滋感染風險?愛滋感染者又如何避免交友軟體上的愛滋污名風險? 本研究的主要發現如下:一、男同志手機交友軟體 Grindr 相較於 Hornet,有較多使用娛樂性藥物的社群,因此使用者發展出的避險策略多與避免娛樂性藥物的使用有關;二、手機交友軟體的即時性和在地性使得性伴侶的配對快速,可能衍生愛滋風險,故使用者傾向於以取得潛在性伴侶的個人資訊和與潛在性伴侶建立關係的策略來降低風險;三、手機交友軟體大多具有標示使用者愛滋篩檢狀態的功能,但該功能的實際效用仍有待商榷;四、即使在手機交友軟體上,受到愛滋污名的影響,愛滋感染狀態的揭露仍然相當不易。 依據主要發現,本研究提出以下建議:一、發展貼近男同志社群手機交友軟體使用生態的介入方案與政策;二、增進年輕族群對手機交友軟體上娛樂性藥物使用術語的認識;三、以手機交友軟體作為去愛滋污名化的平臺;四、從法律層面減少愛滋感染者選擇揭露感染狀態與否時的阻礙。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | According to the statistical data of Taiwan Centers for Disease Control (CDC), men have been in majority of new cases of HIV infection in recent years. Among them, most cases are at the age of twenties and thirties, and the main risk factor is unprotected sexual behaviors of men who have sex with men (MSM). At the same time, traditional ways of making friends in gay community such as meeting in parks, bars or saunas have been replaced with social networking sites and gay geosocial networking apps. Some quantitative research showed that HIV prevalence was significantly higher among app users than non-app users, while other research showed the opposite results, which might be related to the fact that app-using MSM were more likely to have risk-reduction behaviors such as condom use and HIV testing. The inconsistent results not only implied that geosocial networking apps become a faster and more convenient way of making friends for the contemporary gay community in Taiwan and enable gay to have more connections with a vast virtual community, but also implied the apps might cause some potential problems. Nevertheless, in the process of using apps, what strategies are developed when they face possible risks? This research aimed to explore HIV risks and strategies of the users of gay geosocial networking apps and to answer the main question about “how the usage of geosocial networking apps as a way of socializing in gay community increases or decreases HIV infection/stigma risks?” The research was conducted through in-depth interviews and participatory observation, from April to August, 2020. Purposive sampling and snowball sampling were used for the interviews of 15 users of gay geosocial networking apps, including 11 HIV-negative and 4 HIV-positive participants. Participatory observations of two apps, Hornet and Grindr, were also made in Taipei. The main results were as follows: (1) More users of recreational drugs gathered on Grindr than Hornet, and thus the risk-reduction strategies from users were mostly associated with avoidance of recreational drug use. (2) Immediacy and locality were characteristics of apps, which resulted in faster matching made between sex partners and might cause higher HIV risks, and therefore the users tended to obtain personal information from and build relationships with potential sex partners to reduce HIV risks. (3) While apps mostly had the function of labeling the HIV status of users, the effect of the function was still unknown. (4) Disclosure of HIV-positive status through usage of apps was still not easy due to HIV stigma. The research finding suggested: (1) developing intervention programs and policies close to the experiences of using apps among gay community; (2) increasing the knowledge of terms of recreational drug use on apps in young gay community; (3) using apps as platforms to destigmatize HIV; (4) reducing barriers to disclosing HIV status for HIV-positive apps users from a legal perspective. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:39:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1701202114140800.pdf: 4882861 bytes, checksum: 202a8fc887713306b46cfc4065b8d9a7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭………………….………………...…………………………………………………i 中文摘要………………………………………………………...……….…………......iii Abstract…………………………………………………….….…………………………v 目次…………………………………………………………………………...…....…..vii 圖表目次…………………………………………………………...…...…....………....ix 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………....1 第一節 研究緣起………………………………………………………………...1 第二節 研究背景………………………………………………………...............3 第三節 研究問題………………………………………………………...............7 第四節 研究目的………………………………………………………...............7 第五節 章節架構………………………………………………………...............8 第二章 文獻回顧與理論架構……………………………………..........……10 第一節 男同志與手機交友軟體………………………………………..….......10 第二節 男同志手機交友軟體與愛滋風險…………………………………….11 第三節 男同志對愛滋的風險認知與策略………………………..…………...15 第四節 污名身分的印象管理與訊息策略…………………………………….18 第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………..20 第一節 半結構式深度訪談………………………………………….................21 第二節 參與式觀察……………………………………………….....................25 第四章 臺灣男同志使用手機交友軟體的愛滋風險………………..............34 第一節 男同志手機交友軟體的愛滋風險環境…………………….................35 第二節 男同志使用手機交友軟體的愛滋險認知…………………….............52 第三節 小結……………………………………………………………….........73 第五章 臺灣男同志使用手機交友軟體的避險策略………………..............75 第一節 因應愛滋感染風險的避險策略……………………………………….75 第二節 因應愛滋污名風險的避險策略……………………………………...104 第三節 小結……………………………..………………………….................117 第六章 討論………….……………………………….……….………...…..120 第一節 臺灣當代男同志避免愛滋感染風險的策略……..…..…….....……..120 第二節 男同志手機交友軟體與娛樂性藥物的使用……....………………...122 第三節 男同志手機交友軟體與愛滋感染狀態的揭露………………...…....123 第七章 結論與建議…………………………..............……………………..126 第一節 結論…………………………………........………………….....……..126 第二節 政策建議……………………………........………………….....……..129 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議…………………………………………...133 參考文獻……………………………………………………....…..............…..136 附錄一 研究倫理審查核可證書…………………………..…………..........146 附錄二 訪談同意書……………………………………..………..................147 附錄三 訪談大綱:非愛滋感染者………………………………................149 附錄四 訪談大綱:愛滋感染者…………………………………................150 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 高風險性的虛擬空間?臺灣男同志使用手機交友軟體的愛滋風險與避險策略 | zh_TW |
dc.title | HIV/AIDS Risks and Risk Reduction Strategies of the Users of Gay Geosocial Networking Apps in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鍾道詮(Dau-Chuan Chung),李柏翰(Po-Han Lee) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 男同志,手機交友軟體,愛滋風險,愛滋揭露,愛滋污名, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | gay,geosocial networking apps,HIV/AIDS risk,HIV disclosure,HIV stigma, | en |
dc.relation.page | 150 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100076 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-01-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康行為與社區科學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康行為與社區科學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1701202114140800.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.77 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。