請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21554
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 葛宇甯(Louis Ge) | |
dc.contributor.author | Min-Chien Chu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 朱民虔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:37:44Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-22 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-01-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] Adalier, K., and Elgamal, A. (2004). Mitigation of liquefaction and associated ground deformations by stone columns. Engineering Geology, 72(3-4), 275-291.
[2] Araei, A. A., Razeghi, H.R., Tabatabaei, S. H., and Z. and Ghalandarzadeh, A. (2012). Loading frequency effect on stiffness, damping and cyclic strength of molded rockfill materials. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 33, 1-18. [3] Ausal, A.M., and Erken, A. (1989). Undrained behavior of clay under cyclic shear stresses. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 115(7), 968-983. [4] ASTM. (2011). Standard Test Method for Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils1. American Society for Testing and Materials D4767, West Conshohocken, PA. [5] ASTM. (2011). Standard Test Method for Consolidated Drained Triaxial Compression Test for Soils. American Society for Testing and Materials D7181, West Conshohocken, PA. [6] ASTM. (2013). Standard Test Method for Load Controlled Cyclic Triaxial Strength of Soil. American Society for Testing and Materials D5311, West Conshohocken, PA. [7] Baziar, M. H., Shahnazari, H. and Sharafi, H. (2011). A laboratory study on the pore pressure generation model for Firouzkooh silty sands using hollow torsional test. International Journal of Civil Engineering. 9(2), 126–134. [8] Been, K., and Jefferiest, M. G. (1985). A state parameter for sands. Geotechnique, 35(2), 99-112. [9] Booker, J. R., Rahman, M. S., and Seed, H. B. (1976). GADFLEA: A computer program for the analysis of pore pressure generation and dissipation during cyclic or earthquake loading. Rep. No. EERC-76-24. Berkeley, CA: California Univ. [10] Boulanger, Ross W., and Idriss, I. M. (2006). Liquefaction susceptibility criteria for silts and clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132(11), 1413-1426. [11] Bray, J. D. Sancio, R.B. Riemer, M.F., Durgunoglu, T., Onalp, A., Youd, T. L., Stewart, J. P., Seed, R. B., Cetin O. K., Bol, E., Baturay, M. B., Christensen, C., and Karadayilar, T. (2004). Subsurface characterization at ground failure sites in Adapazari, Turkey. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 130(7), 673-685. [12] Bray, J. D., and Sancio, R. B. (2006). Assessment of the Liquefaction Susceptibility of Fine-Grained Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(4), 451-452. [13] Brandes, H. G. (2011). Simple shear behavior of calcareous and quartz sands. Geotechnical Geological engineering, 29, 113-126. [14] Cai, Y., Wu, T., Guo, L., and Wang, J. (2018). Stiffness degradation and plastic strain accumulation of clay under cyclic load with principal stress rotation and deviatoric stress variation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 144(5), 1-11. [15] Carraro, J.A.H., Bandini, P., and Salgado, R. (2003). Liquefaction resistance of clean and nonplastic silty sands based on cone penetration resistance. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129(11), 965-976. [16] Cetin, K. O., and Bilge, H. T. (2011). Cyclic large strain and induced pore pressure models for saturated clean sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 138(3), 309-323. [17] Chen, G., Zhao, D., Chen, W., and Juang, C.H. (2019). Excess pore water pressure generation in cyclic undrained testing. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 145 (7), 1-17. [18] Chiang, M.-H. (2013). Liquefaction Resistance of Low Plasticity Fine-Grained Soil (Master thesis). National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. [19] Chien, L. K., Oh, Y. N., and Chang, C. H. (2002). Effects of fines content on liquefaction strength and dynamic settlement of reclaimed soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(1), 254-265. [20] Chu, B.L., Hsu, S. C., and Chang, Y. M. (2004). Ground behavior and liquefaction analyses in central Taiwan- Wufeng. Engineering Geology, 71, 119-139. [21] Dash, H. K., and Sitharam, T. G. (2016). Effect of frequency of cyclic loading on liquefaction and dynamic properties of saturated sand. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 10(5), 487-492. [22] Dashti, S. Bray, J. D. (2013). Numerical Simulation of Building Response on Liquefiable Sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 139(8),1235-1249. [23] Dashti, S., Bray, J. D., Pestana, J. M., Riemer, M., Wilson, D. (2010). Centrifuge Testing to Evaluate and Mitigate Liquefaction-Induced Building Settlement Mechanisms. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 136(7), 918-929. [24] Derakhshandi, M., Rathje, E.M., Hazirbaba, K., and Mirhosseini, S.M. (2008). The effect of plastic fines on the pore pressure generation characteristics of saturated sands. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28(5), 376-386. [25] Dharma, W., and Sanin, M. V. (2010). Postcyclic reconsolidation strains in low-plastic Fraser River Silt due to dissipation of excess pore-water pressures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 136 (10), 1-11. [26] Dobry, R., Pierce, W. G., Dyvik, R., Thomas, G. E., and Ladd, R. S. (1985). Pore pressure model for cyclic straining of sand. Research Rep., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY. [27] Geoggiannou, V. N., Tsomokos, A., and Stavrou, K. (2008). Monotonic and cyclic behaviour of sand under torsional loading. Geotechnique, 58(2), 113-124. [28] Goudarzy, M., Rahman, M., Konig, D., and Schanz T. (2016). Influence of non-plastic fines content on maximum shear modulus of granular materials. Soils and Foundations, 56(6), 973-983. [29] Hsu, C. C., and Vucetic, M. (2004). Volumetric threshold shear strain for cyclic settlement. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 130(1), 58-70. [30] Hsu, C. C., and Vucetic, M. (2006). Threshold shear strain for cyclic pore-water pressure in cohesive soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 132(10), 1325-1335. [31] Idriss, I. M., Dobry, R., and Singh, R. M. (1978). Nonlinear behavior of soft clay under cyclic loading. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 104(12), 1427-1447. [32] Ishac, M. F., and Heidebrecht, A. C. (1982). Energy dissipation and seismic liquefaction in sands. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 10(1), 59-68. [33] Ishihara, K., and Yoshimine, M. (1992). Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes. Soils and Foundations, 32(1), 173–188. [34] Ishihara, K. (1996). Soil Behaviour in earthquake geotechnics. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press. [35] Jafarian, Y., Baziar, M. H., Noorzad, A., and Bahmanpour, A. (2012). Strain energy-based evaluation of liquefaction and residual pore water pressure in sands using cyclic torsional shear experiments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 65, 142-150. [36] Karakan, E., Tanrinian, N., and Sezer, A. (2019). Cyclic undrained behavior and post liquefaction settlement of a nonplastic silt. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 120, 214-227. [37] Kanatani M., Kiku, H., Yasuda, S., Yoshida, N., Ishihara, K., Kokusho, T., Mimura, M., Goto, Y., and Morimoto, I. (2003). Damages on waterfront Ground During the 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake in Turkey. Soils and Foundations, 43(5), 29-40. [38] Kaya, Z., and Erken, A. (2015). Cyclic and post-cyclic monotonic behavior of Adaoazari soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 77, 83-96. [39] Kokusho T. (1980). Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range. Soils and Foundations, 20(2), 45-60. [40] Kokusho T, Yoshida Y, Esashi Y. (1982). Dynamic properties of soft clay for wide strain range. Soils and Foundations, 22,1–18. [41] Ko Y.-Y., and Chen, C.-H. (2020). On the variation of mechanical properties of saturated sand during liquefaction observed in shaking table tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 129, 1-10. [42] Kumar S. S., and Krishna A. M. (2013). Seismic ground response analysis of some typical sites of Guwahati City. International Journal of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, 4(1), 83-101. [43] Kumar, S. S., Krishna, A. M., and Dey, A. (2017). Evaluation of dynamic properties of sandy soil at high cyclic strain. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 99, 157-167. [44] Kumar, S. S., Dey, A., and Krishna A, M. (2020). Monotonic and dynamic properties of riverbed sand and hill‑slope soils of seismically active North‑east India for ground engineering applications. Geo-Engineering, 11(9), 1-21. [45] Larew, H.G., and Leonards, G.A. (1962). A strength criterion for repeated loading. Highway Research Board Proceedings, 41, 529. [46] Le, T. M. H., Eiksund, G. R., Strøm, P. J., and Saue, M. (2014). Geological and geotechnical characterisation for offshore wind turbine foundations: a case study of the Sheringham shoal wind farm. Engineering Geology, 177, 40-53. [47] Li, Y.-R. (2019). Investigation of Post Cyclic Behavior of Sands under The Framework of Binary Packing (Master thesis). National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. [48] Lu, C. W., Chu, M. C., Ge, L., and Peng, K. S. (2020). Estimation of settlement after soils liquefaction for structures built on shallow foundations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 129,1-9. [49] Maheshwari, B.K., and Patel, A. K. (2010). Effects of Non-Plastic Silts on Liquefaction Potential of Solani Sand. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 28(5), 559-566. [50] Martin, G. R., Finn, W. D. L., and Seed, H. B. (1975). FUNDAMENTALS OF LIQUEFACTION UNDER CYCLIC LOADING. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 101(5), 423-438. [51] Matasović, N., and Vucetic, M. (1993). Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 119(11), 1805-1822. [52] Matasović, N., and Vucetic, M. (1995). Generalized cyclic-degradation-pore pressure generation model for clays. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 121(1), 33-42. [53] Mitchell, J. K. (1993). Fundamentals of soil behavior, 2nd Ed., John Wiley Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y. [54] Mohtar, C.S. EL., Bobet, A, Drnevich, V. P., Johnston, C. T., and Santagata, M. C. (2014). Pore pressure generation in sand with bentonite: from small strains to liquefaction. Geotechnique, 64(2), 108-117. [55] Mortezaie A., and Vucetic, M. (2016). Threshold shear strains for cyclic degradation and cyclic pore water pressure generation in two clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 142(5), 04016007. [56] Oda, M., Kawamoto, K., Suzuki, K., Fujimori, H., and Sato, M. (2001). Microstructural interpretation on reliquefaction of saturated granular soils under cyclic loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(5), 416-423. [57] Okur, D. V., and Ansal, A. (2007). Stiffness degradation of natural fine grained soils during cyclic loading. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 27, 843-854. [58] Polito, C.P., and Martin, J. R. (2001). Effects of nonplastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(5), 408-415. [59] Polito C.P., Green, R.A., and Lee, J. (2008). Pore water pressure generation models for sands and silty soils subjected to cyclic loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134(10), 1490-1500. [60] Porcino, D. D., and Diano, V. (2017). The influence of non-plastic fines on pore water pressure generation and undrained shear strength of sand-silt mixtures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 101, 311-321. [61] Porcino, D. D., and Diano, V., Triantafyllidis, T., and Wichtmann, T. (2020). Predicting undrained static response of sand with non-plastic fines in terms of equivalent granular state parameter. Acta Geotechnica, 15(4), 867-882. [62] Rahman, M., and Gnanendran, C. T. (2008). On equivalent granular void ratio and steady state behaviour of loose sand with fines. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45(10), 1439-1456. [63] Rahman, M., and Baki, L. A. (2011). Equivalent granular state parameter and undrained behaviour of sand–fines mixtures. Acta Geotechnica, 6(4), 183-194. [64] Schofield, A. N., and Wroth, C. P. (1968). Critical State Soil Mechanics, McGraw-Hill. [65] Sağlam, S., and Bakır, B.D. (2014). Cyclic response of saturated silts. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 61-62, 164-175. [66] Sangrey, D.A., Polard, W. S., and Egan, J. A. (1978). Errors associated with rate of undrained cyclic testing of clay soils. In M. Silver and D. Tiedemann, (Eds.), Dynamic Geotechnical Testing (280-294). American Society for Testing and Materials, special technical publication. [67] Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M. (1971). Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 97(9), 1249-1273. [68] Seed, H. B., Martin, P. P., and Lysmer, J. (1975). The generation and dissipation of pore water pressures during soil liquefaction. Rep. No. EERC 75-26, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif. [69] Seed, H. B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L.F., and Chung, R.M. (1985). Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 111(12), 1425-1445 [70] Sharma, S. S., and Fathey, M. (2003). Degradation of stiffness of cemented calcareous soil in cyclic triaxial tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Engineering, ASCE, 129(7), 1619-1629. [71] Shibuya S., Mitachi T., Fukuda F., and Degoshi T. (1995). Strain-rate effects on shear modulus and damping of normally consolidated clay. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 18(3), 365-375. [72] Suazo, G., Fourie, A., Doherty, J., and Hasan, A. (2016). Effects of confining stress, density and initial static shear stress on the cyclic shear response of fine-grained unclassified tailings. Geotechnique, 66(5), 401-412 [73] Suetomi, I., and Yoshida, N., (1998). Nonlinear behavior of surface deposit during the 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake. Soils and Foundations, 38, 11-22. [74] Thevanayagam, S., Shenthan, T., Mohan, S., and Liang, J. (2002). Undrained Fragility of Clean Sands, Silty Sands, and Sandy Silts. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 128(10), 849-859. [75] Thevanayagam, S. (2007). Intergrain contact density indices for granular mixes-II: Liquefaction resistance. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 6(2), 135-146. [76] Tokimastu K., and Seed, B., (1987). Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 113(8), 861-878. [77] Vucetic M., and Dobry, R. (1988). Degradation of marine clays under cyclic loading. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 114(2), 133-149. [78] Vucetic M., and Dobry, R. (1991). Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 117(1), 87-107 [79] Vucetic M., and Mortezaie, A. (2015). Cyclic shear modulus versus pore water pressure in sands at small cyclic strains. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 70, 50-72. [80] Wang, S., Luna, R., and Zhao, H. (2015). Cyclic and post-cyclic shear behavior of low-plasticity silt with varying clay content. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 75,112-120. [81] Xenaki V.C., and Athanasopoulos, G. A. (2003). Liquefaction resistance of sand–silt mixtures: an experimental investigation of the effect of fines. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 23(3), 1-12. [82] Xu, D. S., Liu, H.B., Rui, R., and Gao, Y. (2019). Cyclic and postcyclic simple shear behavior of binary sand-gravel mixtures with various gravel contents. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 123, 230-241. [83] Yamamuro, J.A., and Covert, K. M. (2001). Monotonic and Cyclic Liquefaction of Very Loose Sands with High Silt Content. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(4). [84] Yang, J., Wei, L.M., and Dai, B.B. (2015). State variables for silty sands: Global void ratio or skeleton void ratio? . Soils and Foundations, 55(1), 99-111. [85] Yang, S.L., Sandven, R., and Grande, L. (2006). Steady-state lines of sand-silt mixtures. Canadian Getechnical Journal, 43, 1213-1219. [86] Yang Y.-H. (2020). Soil Stiffness Reduction due to Undrained Cyclic Loading under the Framework of Binary Packing (Master thesis). National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. [87] Yasuhara, K., Yamanouchi, T., and Hirao, K. (1982). Cyclic strength and deformation of normally consolidated clay. Soils and Foundations, 22(3), 77-91. [88] Yasuhara, K., Murakami, S., Song, B.-W., Yokokawa, S., and Hyde, Adrian F. L. (2003). Postcyclic degradation of strength and stiffness for low plasticity silt. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129(8), 756-769. [89] Zergoun, M. and Vaid, Y.P. (1995). Effective stress response of clay to undrained cyclic loading. Canadian Getechnical Journal, 31(5), 714-727. [90] Zhou, J., and Gong, X. (2001). Strain degradation of saturated clay under cyclic loading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 38, 208-212. [91] Zhuang, H., Wang, R., Chen, G., Miao, Y., and Zhao, K. (2018). Shear modulus reduction of saturated sand under large liquefaction-induced deformation in cyclic torsional shear tests. Engineering Geology, 240, 110-122. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21554 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 土壤勁度在大地工程領域是一重要的參數,而土壤勁度的改變也與土體變形量有關。本研究藉由超過二十組動力三軸試驗之施作,著重觀察循環荷載過程中土壤勁度的變化。其中探討包含反覆循環剪應力比、孔隙比、加載頻率及細顆粒含量在勁度改變的影響。其中觀察到第一個荷載循環下產生的平均軸向應變影響勁度折減曲線,並發現第一個荷載循環平均軸向應變因應反覆循環剪應力及孔隙比之改變而變化。而隨著的細顆粒含量改變,等效顆粒孔隙比較孔隙比更能有效反映第一個荷載循環平均軸向應變的改變。並於此研究中提出等效顆粒孔隙比、反覆循環剪應力比及第一個荷載循環平均軸向應變之關係。由於超額孔隙水壓激發與土壤弱化表現有關,藉由本研究中施作之試驗數據觀察結果,提出一簡單勁度變化與超額孔隙水壓比之模型。利用第一個荷載循環平均軸向應變與勁度折減比找出勁度變化過程的軸向應變量。並將第一個荷載循環平均軸向應變、勁度折減比、超額孔隙水壓激發比連結抗液化安全係數,建立室內試驗物理量與廣泛使用參數之關係。 土壤中超額孔隙水壓力的變化為一相當受重視的物理量。除本研究施作之動三軸數據外,額外蒐集多組已發表之動力三軸實驗數據,並針對反覆循環剪應力比、壓密應力及細顆粒含量等等因素對超額水壓激發之影響進行觀察。提出一數學模型模擬水壓激發曲線,此模型能有效描述超額水壓激發曲線,並觀察此數學模型中三個參數因應試驗條件改變所產生之變化,最後提出超額水壓激發上下界之參數選擇建議。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Stiffness is a fundamental property of soils. It governs the deformation of soil layers. More than 20 cyclic triaxial tests were conducted herein to investigate the stiffness degradation during loadings under undrained condition. These tests included four factors: cyclic stress ratio, void ratio, frequency, and fine particles. Through test results, the average axial strain in the first cycle seemed to serve as a factor that decides degradation path of soils. The average axial strain in the first cycle changed in response to void ratio and cyclic stress ratio. With the adding fine particles, the equivalent granular void ratio was found to be more effective in distinguishing the collected data of average axial strain in the first cycle among test results than void ratio. Relations among average axial strain in the first cycle, CSR and equivalent granular void ratio were proposed herein. Excess pore water pressure is a conventional factor that is considered to correlate with weaken behaviors of soils. A simple stiffness degradation model was proposed to be a function of excess pore water pressure ratio. The average axial strain in the first cycle and stiffness degradation ratio were used to predict the axial strain in the degradation process. The average axial strain in the first cycle, stiffness degradation ratio, and excess pore water pressure ratio were correlated with factor of safety against liquefaction. The test results from laboratory were connected to the general parameter by this way. The excess pore water pressure generation is an important issue. In addition to test results in this study, some cyclic triaxial test results from published papers were collected and analyzed in this study of excess pore water pressure generation. Cyclic stress ratio, effective consolidation stress and fines content were observed to be influential to excess pore water pressure generation. A model was proposed in this research to simulate the excess pore water pressure generation. This model, which needs three parameters, was proved to be able to model the excess pore water pressure generation curves effectively. The upper and lower bounds of the excess pore water pressure generation were also recommended herein. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:37:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1901202123420300.pdf: 18013303 bytes, checksum: 1159d4251bb1f4a2db5e61d560325335 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv CONTENTS vi LIST OF FIGURES ix LIST OF TABLES xvi LIST OF SYMBOLS xvii CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation and Objectives 1 1.2 Methodology 2 1.3 Dissertation Outline 3 CHAPTER 2 Literature Review 4 2.1 Stiffness Degradation 4 2.1.1 The effect of CSR and void ratio 5 2.1.2 The responses of excess pore water pressure in cyclic tests 6 2.1.3 The effect of fine particles 7 2.1.4 The effect of loading frequency 8 2.2 Equivalent granular void ratio 9 2.3 Strain-controlled cyclic triaxial test 10 2.4 Excess Pore Water Pressure Generation 11 CHAPTER 3 Experimental Program 18 3.1 Materials 18 3.2 Experimental Apparatus 18 3.2.1 Cyclic triaxial test system 19 3.2.2 Static triaxial test system 20 3.2.3 Resonant column test system 21 3.3 Experimental Procedure 22 CHAPTER 4 Stiffness Degradation 43 4.1 Stiffness Degradation with Varying CSR 43 4.1.1 Axial strain 43 4.1.2 Excess pore water pressure 44 4.2 Stiffness Degradation with Varying Void Ratios 45 4.2.1 Axial strain 45 4.2.2 Excess pore water pressure 46 4.3 Stiffness Degradation with Varying Loading Frequencies 46 4.4 Stiffness Degradation with Varying Fine Particles Contents 47 4.5 A Model for Simulating Axial Strain during Cyclic Loading 50 4.6 Validations of Model 51 4.7 Resonant Column Test Results 52 4.8 Adoptions of Factor of Safety against Soil Liquefaction 53 4.9 Summary 56 CHAPTER 5 Excess Pore Water Pressure Generation 91 5.1 Excess pore water pressure generation among test results 91 5.2 Excess pore water pressure generation models 92 5.3 The performances of the proposed model 93 5.4 Parameters of the proposed model 94 5.5 The upper and lower bounds of the excess pore water pressure generation 94 CHAPTER 6 Conclusions 110 REFERENCE 112 APPENDIX 123 Cyclic Triaxial Tests Results 123 Post-cyclic Tests Results on degradation of mechanic properties 142 The Discussions of Results of CU Test and CD Test on Sand Mixtures 146 Static Triaxial Test Results 146 Critical State Lines in Different Fine Particle Contents 146 Critical State Lines in Cyclic Triaxial Tests 148 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 循環荷載下粗細砂混和土壤之勁度變化與水壓激發 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Stiffness Degradation and Excess Pore Water Pressure Generation of Coarse and Fine Sand Mixture due to Cyclic Loading | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊國鑫(Kuo-Hsin Yang),郭安妮(On-Lei Annie Kwok),蔡祁欽(Chi-Chin Tsai),盧之偉(Chih-Wei Lu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 勁度折減,動力三軸試驗,水壓激發,細顆粒,土壤動態行為, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | stiffness degradation,cyclic triaxial test,excess pore water pressure,fine particles,behavior of soil dynamics, | en |
dc.relation.page | 174 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100098 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-01-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1901202123420300.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 17.59 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。