請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21534完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林明仁 | |
| dc.contributor.author | "Yu-Chun, Cheng" | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 鄭伃君 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:37:05Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-07-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-23 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Allers, M. A. and C. Hoeben (2010). Effects of unit-based garbage pricing: a differencesin-differences approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 45(3), 405–428.
Anderson, M. L. (2014). Subways, strikes, and slowdowns: The impacts of public transit on traffic congestion. American Economic Review 104(9), 2763–96. Auffhammer, M. and R. Kellogg (2011). Clearing the air? the effects of gasoline content regulation on air quality. American Economic Review 101(6), 2687–2722. Bento, A., D. Kaffine, K. Roth, and M. Zaragoza-Watkins (2014). The effects of regulation in the presence of multiple unpriced externalities: Evidence from the transportation sector. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6(3), 1–29. Besley, T. and A. Case (2000). Unnatural experiments? estimating the incidence of endogenous policies. The Economic Journal 110(467), 672–694. Calonico, S., M. D. Cattaneo, and R. Titiunik (2014). Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica 82(6), 2295–2326. Chandra, A., J. Gruber, and R. McKnight (2010). Patient cost-sharing and hospitalization offsets in the elderly. American Economic Review 100(1), 193–213. Dijkgraaf, E. and R. H. Gradus (2004). Cost savings in unit-based pricing of household waste: The case of the netherlands. Resource and energy economics 26(4), 353–371. Douven, R., R. Van der Heijden, T. McGuire, and F. Schut (2019). Premium levels and demand response in health insurance: relative thinking and zero-price effects. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Han, H.-W., H.-M. Lien, and T.-T. Yang (2019). Patient cost sharing and healthcare utilization in early childhood: evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Available at SSRN 2851278.23 Hausman, C. and D. S. Rapson (2018). Regression discontinuity in time: Considerations for empirical applications. Annual Review of Resource Economics 10, 533–552. Hong, S. and R. M. Adams (1999). Household responses to price incentives for recycling: some further evidence. Land Economics, 505–514. Huang, J.-C., J. M. Halstead, and S. B. Saunders (2011). Managing municipal solid waste with unit-based pricing: policy effects and responsiveness to pricing. Land Economics 87(4), 645–660. Iizuka, T. and H. Shigeoka (2018). Free for children? patient cost-sharing and healthcare utilization. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research. Kaza, S., L. Yao, P. Bhada-Tata, and F. Van Woerden (2018). What a waste 2.0: a global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank Publications. Kinnaman, T. C. and D. Fullerton (2000). Garbage and recycling with endogenous local policy. Journal of Urban Economics 48(3), 419–442. Lang, C. and M. Siler (2013). Engineering estimates versus impact evaluation of energy efficiency projects: Regression discontinuity evidence from a case study. Energy policy 61, 360–370. Leibowitz, A., W. G. Manning, E. B. Keeler, N. Duan, K. N. Lohr, and J. P. Newhouse (1985). Effect of cost-sharing on the use of medical services by children: interim results from a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 75(5), 942–951. Newhouse, J. P., W. G. Manning, C. N. Morris, L. L. Orr, N. Duan, E. B. Keeler, A. Leibowitz, K. H. Marquis, M. S. Marquis, C. E. Phelps, et al. (1981). Some interim results from a controlled trial of cost sharing in health insurance. New England Journal of Medicine 305(25), 1501–1507. OECD (2006). Impacts of unit-based waste collection charges. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentPublishing.24 Rivers, N., S. Shenstone-Harris, and N. Young (2017). Using nudges to reduce waste? the case of toronto’s plastic bag levy. Journal of environmental management 188, 153–162. Shampanier, K., N. Mazar, and D. Ariely (2007). Zero as a special price: The true value of free products. Marketing science 26(6), 742–757. Usui, T. and K. Takeuchi (2014). Evaluating unit-based pricing of residential solid waste: a panel data analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics 58(2), 245–271. Van Houtven, G. L. and G. E. Morris (1999). Household behavior under alternative payas-you-throw systems for solid waste disposal. Land Economics, 515–537. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21534 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 垃圾減量⼀直是全球垃圾政策的⽬標之⼀。新北市與台北市實施的隨袋徵收政策（使⽤者付費）是近年來被認為相當成功的垃圾減量政策之⼀，因此檢驗政策是否真的有助於家⼾丟垃圾⾏為的改變，兩者之間是有真實存在因果關係乃重要議題之⼀。本論⽂利⽤新北市2008 到2011 年，各個鄉鎮(⾏政區) 實施隨袋政策時間點作為斷點進⾏迴歸不連續法與鄉鎮層級的公務統計資料，檢驗使⽤者付費垃圾政策，對於家⼾⾏為的影響。
我們發現，使⽤者付費隨袋徵收政策，顯著降低家⼾⼀般垃圾的丟棄量達50% 左右，並增加廚餘的丟棄量達40%。其中，垃圾丟棄量減少的效果，在低所得地區更為顯著。使⽤者付費政策對家⼾回收丟棄量，只有在⾼所得與⾼教育⽔準地區有效果。此外，本⽂並沒有發現隨袋徵收政策，有顯著的政策外部性 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper exploits the historical statistical data and government open data at the district level to examine the effect of Pay-As-You-Throw (User-Charge) on households’waste behavior. New Taipei City (Taiwan’s most populous city) initiated a Trash Per-bag Fee Collection Policy, versus the previous one based on household tap water consumption, in each district at different times from 2008 to 2011. We utilized the regression discontinuity design to estimate the overall policy effect and found the user-charge policy reduced solid waste quantities by about 50%, and increased food waste by about 40%.For the reduction of solid waste, the effect is stronger in the low income group. On the other hand, the effect of user charge on recycling significantly increase recycling only in higher education level and income group. In addition, the policy externality of user-charge is not statistically significant. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:37:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06323003-1.pdf: 6010685 bytes, checksum: fcca9245e0aa9669ca919b9706285f49 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv CONTENTS v List of Figures vi List of Tables vii 1 Introduction 1 2 Policy background 3 2.1 General Waste Management and regulations in Taiwan 4 2.2 General Waste Disposal Fee in Taiwan 5 2.3 Per-Bag Trash Collection Fee policy in New Taipei City 6 Chapter 3 Data 7 3.1 Waste Data 7 3.2 District Characteristic Data 8 4 The effect of User-charge waste policy 9 4.1 Sample 9 4.2 Empirical Strategy 9 4.3 Main Result 11 4.4 Robustness Checks 12 4.4.1 Sample Criteria 12 4.4.2 Estimation Specification 12 4.4.3 Choices of Polynomial Order and Bandwidth 13 4.5 Subgroup 14 4.4.1 Detail Recycling 14 4.4.2 District Characteristics 14 4.6 Conclusion and Discussion 15 4.6.1 The Zero-Price/Nudge effect of User-Charge Policy 15 4.6.1 Heterogeneous driving force 17 5 Policy Externality 18 5.1 Sample 18 5.2 Empirical Strategy 19 5.3 Main Result 20 5.4 Robustness Checks 21 5.4 Conclusion and Discussion 21 REFERENCE 23 APPENDIX 41 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 使⽤者付費政策對於家⼾⾏為之影響：以新北市隨袋徵收政策為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effect of User-Charge Policy on Household Waste Behavior | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 楊?霆 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉錦添 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 使?者付費政策,迴歸不連續法,家??為,?般垃圾,廚餘,回收, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | User-Charge Policy,Regression Discontinuity Design,Household Behavior,Solid Waste,Food waste,Recycling, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 43 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901832 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-24 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.87 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。