請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21471完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳玲玲(Ling-Ling Wu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ai-Hsuan Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃艾瑄 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:35:02Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-07 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-31 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Chatterjee, Patrali. (2001). Online Reviews : Do Consumers Use Them ? Association for Consumer Research, 18, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.900158
Chen, M.-Y. (2016). Can two-sided messages increase the helpfulness of online reviews? Online Information Review, 40(3), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2015-0225 Chen, Z., & Lurie, N. H. (2013). Temporal Contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word of Mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0063 Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word‐of‐mouth. Internet Research, 18(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883290 Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008 Cheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415130402 Crowley, A. E., & Hoyer, W. D. (1994). An Integrative Framework for Understanding Two-Sided Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 561. https://doi.org/10.1086/209370 DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. In Journal of Management Information Systems (Vol. 19, pp. 9–30). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 Ein-Gar, D., Shiv, B., & Tormala, Z. L. (2012). When Blemishing Leads to Blossoming: The Positive Effect of Negative Information. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 846–859. https://doi.org/10.1086/660807 Eisend, M. (2007). Understanding two-sided persuasion: An empirical assessment of theoretical approaches. Psychology and Marketing, 24(7), 615–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20176 Eisend, M. (2013). The Moderating Influence of Involvement on Two-Sided Advertising Effects. Psychology & Marketing, 30(7), 566–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20628 Folkes, V. S. (1988). Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 548. https://doi.org/10.1086/209135 Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swasy, J. L. (1990). Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 433. https://doi.org/10.1086/209228 Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0193 Freedman, L. (2008). Merchant and Customer perspectives on Customer Reviews and User-generated content. The E-Tailing Group, (February), 1–28. Retrieved from http://www.e-tailing.com/content/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2008_WhitePaper_0204_4FINAL-powerreviews.pdf Girard, T., & Dion, P. (2010). Validating the search, experience, and credence product classification framework. Journal of Business Research, 63(9–10), 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.12.011 Handler, I., & Chang, W. (2015). Social Attributes of a Smartphone and their importance to young Taiwanese consumers: an explorative study. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 4(5), 16–29. Retrieved from www.ijac.org.uk Hastak, M., & Park, J.-W. (1990). Mediators of Message Sidedness Effects on Cognitive Structure for Involved and Uninvolved Audiences. Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 329–336. Retrieved from http://ww.w.acrwebsite.org/search/view-conference-proceedings.aspx?Id=9832 Haverila, M. (2011). Mobile phone feature preferences, customer satisfaction and repurchase intent among male users. Australasian Marketing Journal, 19(4), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2011.05.009 Huang, P., Lurie, N. H., & Mitra, S. (2009). Searching for Experience on the Web: An Empirical Examination of Consumer Behavior for Search and Experience Goods. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.2.55 Hunt, J. M., & Smith, M. F. (1987). The persuasive impact of two-sided selling appeals for an unknown brand name. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721949 Jensen, M. L., Averbeck, J. M., Zhang, Z., & Wright, K. B. (2013). Credibility of Anonymous Online Product Reviews: A Language Expectancy Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(1), 293–324. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222300109 Kamins, M. A., & Assael, H. (1987). Two-Sided versus One-Sided Appeals: A Cognitive Perspective on Argumentation, Source Derogation, and the Effect of Disconfirming Trial on Belief Change. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151751 Kamins, M. A., Brand, M. J., Hoeke, S. A., & Moe, J. C. (1989). Two-Sided versus One-Sided Celebrity Endorsements: The Impact on Advertising Effectiveness and Credibility. Journal of Advertising, 18(2), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1989.10673146 Kao, D. T. (2012). Exploring the effect of regulatory focus on ad attitudes: The moderating roles of message sidedness and argument quality. International Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.628672 Klein, L. R. (1998). Evaluating the Potential of Interactive versus Experience Goods. Journal of Business Research, 2963(97), 195–203. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0148296397000623 Korfiatis, N., García-Bariocanal, E., & Sánchez-Alonso, S. (2012). Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2011.10.003 Laczniak, R. N., DeCarlo, T. E., & Ramaswami, S. N. (2001). Consumers’ Responses to Negative Word-of-Mouth Communication: An Attribution Theory Perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1207/15327660152054049 Lu, L.-C., Chang, W.-P., & Chang, H.-H. (2014). Consumer attitudes toward blogger’s sponsored recommendations and purchase intention: The effect of sponsorship type, product type, and brand awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.007 Maity, M., & Dass, M. (2014). Consumer decision-making across modern and traditional channels: E-commerce, m-commerce, in-store. Decision Support Systems, 61(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.01.008 Mudambi, & Schuff. (2010). Research Note: What Makes a Helpful Online Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721420 Nelson, P. (1970). Information and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1086/259630 Oyewole, P. (2013). Multiattribute Dimensions of Service Quality in the All-You-Can-Eat Buffet Restaurant Industry. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2011.638418 Pavlou, P. A., & Dimoka, A. (2009). The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces : Implications for trust building , price premiums , and seller differentiation What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust ? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study Resea. Information Systems Research, 17(September), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2307/23015813 Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. In Communication and Persuasion (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2 Purnawirawan, N., Dens, N., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2012). Balance and Sequence in Online Reviews: The Wrap Effect. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(2), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415170203 Qiu, L., Pang, J., & Lim, K. H. (2012, December 1). Effects of conflicting aggregated rating on eWOM review credibility and diagnosticity: The moderating role of review valence. Decision Support Systems. North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.020 Schlosser, A. E. (2011). Can including pros and cons increase the helpfulness and persuasiveness of online reviews? The interactive effects of ratings and arguments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(3), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.04.002 Smith, R. E., & Hunt, S. D. (1978). Attributional Processes and Effects in Promotional Situations. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(3), 149. https://doi.org/10.1086/208725 Walther, J. B., Liang, Y., Ganster, T., Wohn, D. Y., & Emington, J. (2012). Online Reviews, Helpfulness Ratings, and Consumer Attitudes: An Extension of Congruity Theory to Multiple Sources in Web 2.0. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01595.x Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0042 Zhang, W., & Watts, S. (2003). Knowledge adoption in online communities of practice. In International Conference on Information Systems Proceedings (Vol. 9, pp. 96–109). https://doi.org/10.3917/sim.162.0067 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21471 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 口碑的片面性是網路口碑的重要屬性之一，過去研究也發現其對於產品歸因及感知助益性有正向的影響（同時提到正負面的口碑會比只提到正面或負面的口碑更歸因到產品或更有幫助）。由於網路口碑的匿名性使得消費者難以從評論者的身份判斷其可信度，而需轉向口碑內容品質來評估。由此可知資訊完整度以及感知真實性對於網路口碑的重要性是不言而喻的，然而現存有關口碑片面性的文獻卻少有相關的研究。因此本研究調查兩面口碑是否比片面口碑更能提升資訊完整度、感知真實性。儘管眾多的研究支持片面性效應，仍有文獻不一致的情況出現;這代表可能有調節因子的存在，Nelson的產品類型（1970）便可作為調節因子來解釋這種不一致性。搜索品評論的可比較性和更客觀的特性將激勵消費者更願意處理，因為他們期望投入的努力將得到回報。反之，體驗品評論的需要消費者自身感官評估的性質會降低消費者的處理動機，因為他們認為不值得付出認知成本。採用推敲可能性模型理論，本研究假設由產品類型引起的消費者動機差異會導致片面性效應的不一致。本研究提出在資訊完整性，感知真實性，產品歸因和感知助益性方面，在搜索品的情況下，片面性效應將比在體驗品下來得更強。實證結果支持了本研究的大多數假設，並推動對片面性效應及其調節因子產品類型的理論解釋。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Review sidedness has found to positively affect perceived helpfulness and product-related attribution. Consumers cannot judge the reviewer's credibility due to eWOM anonymity; instead, they would focus on the review quality to form credibility. The importance of information completeness and perceived truthfulness in eWOM is self-evident. Yet, little evidence of these two factors can be found in the research of review sidedness. Hence, we investigated whether the two-sided review would boost completeness and truthfulness more than the one-sided review. Still, other scholars find the sidedness effect not significant; moderators like Nelson's product type have emerged to explain this inconsistency. The comparable and objective manner of search good reviews would motivate consumers more to process since they expected the effort devoted would pay-off. Vice versa, the sense-required nature of experience good review would make the consumers less motivated to process inasmuch as they do not consider it is worthy. Adopting ELM, we postulated the presence of the sidedness effect results from the difference of consumer’s motivation caused by product type. We proposed the sidedness effect would be stronger under search good than experience good condition on information completeness, perceived truthfulness, product-related attribution, and perceived helpfulness. The empirical results support most of our hypotheses and advance the theoretical explanation for the sidedness effect and product type. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:35:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06725042-1.pdf: 1645673 bytes, checksum: 2db247d79ea6ee4e4f9da480cd859709 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iii List of Figures vii List of Tables viii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review 6 2.1 Review Sidedness: Two-sided review and One-sided review 6 2.1.1 Sidedness effect on information completeness 6 2.1.2 Sidedness effect on perceived truthfulness 7 2.1.3 Sidedness effect on product-related attribution and perceived helpfulness.... 8 2.2 The Search-Experience Paradigm: Product Type as A Moderator 10 2.3 Theoretical Framework: Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion 11 Chapter 3 Research Methodology 15 3.1 Experimental Design 15 3.2 Manipulation of Review Sidedness 16 3.3 Product Selection 17 3.4 Measurement of Dependent Variables 19 3.5 Participants 20 3.6 Procedure 21 Chapter 4 Empirical results 23 4.1 Manipulation Check 23 4.2 Test of Hypotheses 23 4.2.1 Information completeness 26 4.2.2 Perceived truthfulness 27 4.2.3 Product-related attribution 30 4.2.4 Perceived helpfulness 31 Chapter 5 Conclusion and discussion 33 5.1 Conclusion and implication 33 5.1.1 Conclusion 33 5.1.2 Theoretical implication 34 5.1.3 Practical implication 34 5.2 Limitation and future work 35 REFERENCE 37 Appendix A 42 Appendix B 44 Appendix C 46 Appendix D 48 Appendix E 51 Appendix F 53 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 線上口碑片面性效應之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Investigation of Online Review Sidedness Effect | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 魏志平(Chih-Ping Wei),孔令傑(Ling-Chieh Kung) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 網路口碑片面性效應,資訊完整性,感知真實性,產品歸因,感知助益性,產品類別,推敲可能性模型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sidedness effect on eWOM,information completeness,perceived truthfulness,product-related attribution,perceived helpfulness,search goods,experience goods,ELM, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 53 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902244 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-01 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.61 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。