請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21214完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊宏智 | |
| dc.contributor.author | CHIH-CHING HUNG | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 洪志菁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:28:49Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-23 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Batagelj, V. Mrvar, A. 1998. Pajek—program for large network analysis, Connections. 21 (2), 47–57.
2. Blind K, Cremers K, M¨uller E. 2009. The influence of strategic patenting on companies’ patent portfolios. Research Policy 38(2): 428–436. 3. Bergman, E., Usai, S., 2009. Knowledge diffusion in European regions, IAREG Delivrable 4.1. 4. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., 2000. Models of core/periphery structures. Social networks 21 (4), 375–395. 5. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. 2002. UCINET for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies. 6. Borgatti, S. P. 2005. Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27(1), 55-71. 7. Chang, S.B., 2012. Using patent analysis to establish technological position: two different strategic approaches, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (1), 3–15. 8. Chen, Y. S., and Chen, B. Y., 2011 Utilizing patent analysis to explore the cooperative competition relationship of the two LED companies: Nichia and Osram, Technological Forecasting & Social Change 78, 294–302. 9. Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP. 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working paper 7552, NBER, Cambridge, MA. 10. Daim, T.U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., Gerdsri, P., 2006. Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73 (8), 981-1012. 11. Devi, R. Gnyawali, B.J., 2011 Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation, Research Policy 40, 650–663. 12. Erin, T., Schikora, M. Paul F., 2010. Co-opetition between SAP and oracle : the effects of the partnership and competition on the companies’ success, Journal of business case studies, 6(4), 59-65. 13. Ernst, H., Conley, J., and Omland, 2016. How to create commercial value from patents: the role of patent management H Ernst, J Conley, N Omland - R&D Management, in press. 14. Epicoco, M., 2013 Knowledge patterns and sources of leadership: Mapping the semiconductor miniaturization trajectory, Researh Policy, 42, 180-195. 15. Érdi, P., Makovi, K., Somogyvàri, Z., et al., 2013., Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US patent citation network, Scientometrics, 95, 225–242. 16. Freeman, L.C., 1979'Centrality in Social Networks; Conceptual Clarification', Social Networks, 1, pp.215-239. 17. Grindley, P.C. and Teece, D.J. 1997. Managing intellectual capital: licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics, California management review 39, 8–41. 18. Granovetter, M.S., 1992.'Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology', in N.Nohria and R.Eccles (Eds),'Networks and Organization:Structure,Form, and Action',pp.25-62, Boston:Harvard Business School 19. Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. 2003. Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32, 1365–1379. 20. Hartigan, J. A.; Wong, M. A. 1979. Algorithm AS 136: A k-Means Clustering Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C., 28 (1): 100–108. 21. Hu, M. C., Phillips, F. Y., Wu, Wang. S. H., 2015 The influence of the technological regime on the global light-emitting diode industry: lessons from innovative leaders and latecomers, Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 17 (1) 91-114. 22. Hanneman, R.A., and Mark R., 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside ( published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/ ) 23. Ibarra, H. 1993,'Network Centrality, Power and Innovation Involvement: Determinants of Technical and Administrative Roles', Academy of Management Journal, Vol.36 (3), pp.471-501. 24. IDC 2010. Worldwide LED market and industry competition analysis. Presented by Anneable Hsu on September 12, 2010, Taipei, Taiwan. 25. Kim, H., and Song, J., (2013). Social network analysis of patent infringement lawsuits, Technological Forecasting & Social Change 80, 944–955. 26. Knoke, D., & Burt, R. S. (1983). Prominence. In R. S. Burt, & M. J. Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. 27. Kürtössy, J. (2004). Innovation indicators derived form patent data, Management Science 12, 91–101. 28. Lai, K.K., and Wu, S.J., 2005.Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system, Information Processing and Management 41, 313–330. 29. Lee, S., Yoon, B., Lee, C., Park, J., (2009a). Business planning based on technological capabilities: Patent analysis for technology-driven roadmapping, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76 769–786. 30. Lee, S. Yoon, B. Park, Y. 2009b. An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: key word-based patent map approach, Technovation, 29, 481–497. 31. Li, Y.T., Huang, M.H., Chen, D.Z., 2014. Positioning and shifting of technology focus for integrated device manufacturers by patent perspectives, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81, 363-375. 32. Lloyd, M., Spielthenner, D., Mokdsi, G., 2011. Smartphone Patent Wars — Network Patent Analysis, IAM Journal, March, 2011. 33. Martinelli, A., (2012) An emerging paradigm or just another trajectory? Understanding the nature of technological changes using engineering heuristics in the telecommunications switching industry, Research Policy 41, 414– 429. 34. Mendonça, S. Pereira, T.S. Godinho, M.M. 2004.Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change, Research Policy 33 (9), 1385–1404. 35. Mina, A., Ramlogan, R., Tampubolon, G., & Metcalfe, J. S. (2007). Mapping evolutionary trajectories: Applications to the growth and transformation of medical knowledge. Research Policy, 36(5), 789–806. 36. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S.1998,'Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage,'Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. 37. Newman, M. E. J. 2004. Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks. In E. Ben-Naim, H. Frauenfelder, & Z. Toroczkai (Eds.), Complex networks (pp. 337–370). Berlin: Springer. From http://www-personal.umich.edu/∼mejn/papers/cnlspre.pdf Retrieved 11.08.09 38. Pistorino, J. C. (2014, February). 2012 trends in patent case filings and venuehttps://www.perkinscoie.com/images/content/2/8/v2/28227/lit-13-02pistorino-2012article.pdf 39. Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks towards a new paradigm for research. New York: The Free Press. 40. Rumelt RP. 1984. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In Competitive Strategic Management, Lamb B (ed). Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 556–570. 41. Schiavone, F., and Simoni, M., (2011) An experience-based viewof co-opetition in R&D network, European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(2), 136-154. 42. Sternitzke, C., Bartkowski, A., and Schramm, R., (2008) Patent and literature statistics–The case of optoelectronics. World Patent Information, 29(4), 327-338. 43. Teece DJ. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15: 285–305. 44. Tontaa, Y., and Darvish, H. R., 2010. Diffusion of latent semantic analysis as a research tool: A social network analysis approach. Journal of informetrics: 4. 166-174. 45. Türtössy, J. 2004. Innovation indicators derived form patent data, Management Science 12, 91–101. 46. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), 2015. The definition is reported in the USPTO Glossary available at www.uspto. gov/main/glossary. Other patent offices provide similar definitions. 47. Uzzi.B, 1996'The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Orgnization: The Network Effect', American Sociological Review, 61, pp.674-698. 48. Van Wijk, J., Stam, W., Flfring, T., Zietsma, C., Hond, F. D., (2013) Activists and incumbents structuring change: The interplay of agency, culture, and networks in field evolution, Academy of Management Journal, 56 (2), 358-386. 49. Wang, J. C., Chiang, C.H., and Lin, S. W., 2010. Network structure of innovation: can brokerage or closure predict patent quality? Scientometrics, 84,735–748. 50. Wasko, M.M. and Faraj, S.2005,'Why should I share?Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice,'MIS Quarterly,29(1),35-57. 51. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. 52. Ziedonis RH. 2004. Don’t fence me in: fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Science 50(6): 804–820. 53. 刘苹、蔡鹏、蒋斌。(2010年9月)。企业家社会网络对企业绩效的影响机制。财经科学，270期，56-62。 54. 晏文胜、彭华涛。(2006年9月)。高科技创业社会网络的绩效预测。武汉理工大学学报-信息与工程管理工程版，第28卷第9期，164-168。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21214 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文調查了發光二極體（LED）產業的侵權和訴訟動態，包括全球LED公司之間的合作和衝突。我們應用社會網絡理論來檢驗侵權和訴訟結構的形成，並探討這些動態如何聚合以塑造全球LED產業的技術發展。他們的網絡結構特徵截然不同，影響了LED公司的專利侵權和訴訟方式。利用全球主要LED公司的專利資料，我們構建了公司的專利侵權和訴訟網絡，並檢驗了關於全球LED產業三個層面網絡中三個結構特徵來影響專利侵權訴訟網絡、專利和解子網絡和全球LED交叉授權網絡。最後，我們還通過數據集來估算和預測技術相似性和重疊。在102家全球LED公司中檢查這些關係，共有235個專利訴訟樣本，對我們的論點給予強有力的支持。通過這樣我們通過展示專利侵權訴訟網絡，專利和解子網絡和全球LED交叉授權網絡做出了重要的理論貢獻。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates the infringement and lawsuit dynamics of a light emitting diode (LED) industry encompassing collaboration and conflict among global LED firms. We apply and advance social network theory to examine the formation of infringement and lawsuit structures, and to explore how these dynamics aggregate to shape the technological development of a global LED industry. Their network structural features are distinct and influence focal LED firms’ patent infringement and lawsuit differently. Using the patent data of global focal LED firms, we constructed the firm’s infringement and lawsuit networks, and examined the effects of three structural features in the three firm level networks—patent infringement lawsuit networks, patent settlement sub-network, and global LED cross-license network—on the global LED industry. Finally, we also estimate and forecast the technological similarity and overlapping by through our dataset. Examine these relationships in a 102 global LED firms with 235 patent litigation samples and find strong support for our arguments. In so doing, we make an important theoretical contribution by showing that the patent infringement lawsuit networks, patent settlement sub-network, and global LED cross-license network. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:28:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-D96522004-1.pdf: 4357028 bytes, checksum: f73c3024c6f30c636a3e8b1d28cd5986 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract i
中文摘要 ii 誌 謝 iii Table of Contents iv List of Tables vi List of Figures vii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research background and motivation 1 1.2 Research purposes of the study 4 1.3 Organization of the Study 5 2. Related literature review 8 2.1 Global LED industry development 8 2.2 Patent technologies in global LED sectors 11 2.3 Social networks analysis 15 2.4 The Fundamental of social network analysis 19 2.5 Social network approaches in patent analysis 21 2.6 Patent and technological trajectory……………………………………….………...…26 3. Research methodology 28 3.1 LED patent-infringement lawsuits data collection 28 3.2 The matrix of patent patent-infringement lawsuits 30 3.3 Measurement…………………………………………..……………………………………….32 Chapter 4 Empirical results 36 4.1 The network structure of the patent-infringement lawsuits 36 4.2 The settlement sub-network structure of the LED focal firms……………...46 4.3 The cross-license network of global LED firms…………………………………...49 4.4 The forecasting of risk of patent infringement 55 4.4.1 Firms level patent infringement forecasting 55 4.4.2 Forecasting from patent infringement to lawsuit 70 4.4.3 Verification the research method by the commuincation industry……………………………………………………………………………………….....74 Chapter 5 Conclusions 77 Reference 83 Appendix 1 Dominant LED firms patent IPC dataset 88 Appendix 2 Dominant LED firms patent IPC program 109 Appendix 3 Test set Data 119 Appendix 4 Hartigan’ K-means classification algorithm and data 141 Appendix 5 Patent infringement and lawsuit raw data……………….…………….........144 口試照片………………………………………………………………………………………….…………156 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 專利侵權訴訟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | LED產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 交叉授權網絡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 技術部署 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會網路分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | technology deploying | en |
| dc.subject | LED industry | en |
| dc.subject | sub-network | en |
| dc.subject | cross-license network | en |
| dc.subject | patent infringement and lawsuit | en |
| dc.title | 全球發光二極體產業專利侵權與訴訟研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Patent infringement and lawsuit on global LED industry | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李貫銘,康銘元,陳威霖,林傳傑 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | LED產業,專利侵權訴訟,交叉授權網絡,技術部署,社會網路分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | LED industry,patent infringement and lawsuit,sub-network,cross-license network,technology deploying, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 156 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902959 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 機械工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 機械工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.25 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。