請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21176
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃光國(Kwang-Kuo Hwang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Ho Tien | en |
dc.contributor.author | 田佳禾 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:28:11Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-04-07 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-03-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 危芷芬、黃光國(1998):〈積極義務與消極義務:台美大學生道德判斷的文化比較研究〉。《中華心理學刊》,40,137-153。 余英時(1991):《從價值系統看中國文化的現代意義》,臺北:時報文化。 李明輝(1989):《儒家與康德》,臺北:聯經出版公司。 李明輝(1991):〈人有說謊的權利嗎?──與甘陽先生商榷〉,《鵝湖月刊》,197,26-28。 doi:10.29652/LM.199111.0005 李明輝(2012):〈儒家、康德與德行倫理學〉。《哲學研究》,10,111-117。 李明輝(2015):〈再論儒家、康德倫理學與德行倫理學-評唐文明的《隱秘的顛覆》〉。《臺灣東亞文明研究學刊》,12(2),327-349。 doi:10.6163/tjeas.2015.12(2)327 李明輝(2016a):〈康德論德行義務:兼論麥金泰爾對康德倫理學的批評〉。《歐美研究》,46(2),211-241。 doi:10.7015/JEAS.201606_46(2).0002 李明輝(2016b):《康德哲學在東亞》,臺北:臺大出版中心。doi:10.6327/NTUPRS-9789863501688 林火旺(2004):〈公共理性的功能及其限制〉。《政治與社會哲學評論》,8,47-77。 doi:10.6523/168451532004030008002 林火旺(2005):《倫理學入門》。上海:上海古籍出版社。 林端(2002):〈全球化下的儒家倫理:社會學觀點的考察〉。見黃俊傑(編):《傳統中華文化與現代價值的激盪與調融》。臺北:財團法人喜瑪拉雅研究發展基金會。 林遠澤(2017):《儒家後習俗責任倫理學的理念》。臺北:聯經出版公司。 張芬芬(2010):〈質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升〉,《初等教育學刊》,35,87-120。 doi:10.7036/JEE.201004.0087 馬慶強(1997):〈中國人之感性與認知方面的道德發展〉。《本土心理學研究》(台北),7,166-212。 陳向明(2002):《社會科學質的研究》。臺北:五南出版社。 陳舜文(1999):〈「仁」與「禮」:台灣民眾的家庭價值觀與工作態度〉。《應用心理研究》,4,205-227。 陳舜文、邱振訓(2011):〈道德判斷的「雙重歷程模式」:認知、情緒與文化的整合觀點〉。《本土心理學研究》,36,33-76。 doi:10.6254/2011.36.33 傅寶玉、雷霆(1991):〈社會思慮發展研究在港、台〉。見楊中芳與高尚仁(編):《中國人˙中國心》。台北:遠流圖書公司。 喻豐、彭凱平、韓婷婷、柴方圓與柏陽(2011):〈道德困境之困境:情與理的辯爭〉。《心理科學進展》,19(11), 1702 - 1712. 程小危(1991):〈道德判斷發展研究的泛文化性探討〉。見楊中芳與高尚仁(編):《中國人˙中國心》。台北:遠流圖書公司。 黃光國(2001):〈儒家關係主義的理論建構及其方法論基礎〉,《教育與社會研究》,2,1-34。 doi:10.6429/FES.200106.0001 黃光國(2009):《儒家關係主義: 哲學反思、理論建構、與實徵研究》。台北:心理出版社。 黃光國(2011):《心理學的科學革命方案》。台北:心理出版社。 黃光國(2013):〈儒家文化中的倫理療癒〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》,37,1-54。 黃光國(2018),《 內聖與外王: 儒家思想的完成與開展》。台北:心理出版社 黃俊傑(2009):〈全球化時代朱子理一分殊說的新意義與新挑戰〉。見蔡振豐(編):《東亞朱子學的詮釋與發展》。台北:臺大出版中心。 楊中芳(1991):〈試論中國人的道德發展─一個自我發展的觀點〉。見楊國樞、黃光國(編):《中國人的心理與行為 (一九八九)》。台北:桂冠圖書公司。 楊雲飛(2013):〈論康德對羅爾斯正義理論的影響——兼談哲學史對於當代哲學研究的啟發意義〉。《武漢大學學報:人文科學版》,66(2),26-34。 葉光輝(1998):〈一種、兩種還是多種道德:如何界定道德判準的判準〉。《本土心理學研究》,9,187-204。 葉光輝(2011):〈談如何建構一個好的本土心理學理論〉。《本土心理學研究》,36,139-153。 doi:10.6254/2011.36.139 葉光輝、楊國樞(2008):《中國人的孝道:心理學的分析》。台北:國立台灣大學出版中心。 doi:10.6327/NTUPRS-9789860143966 Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1-19. doi:10.1017/S0031819100037943 Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ault, J.M., Jr. (2005). Spirit and flesh: Life in a fundamentalist Baptist church. New York: Knopf. Baron, J. (1994). Nonconsequentialist decisions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 1–42. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0003301X Baumeister, R. (2005). The cultural animal. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195167030.001.0001 Bernard, H. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology. Newbury, CA: Sage. Bhaskar, R. A. (1975). A realist theory of science. Leeds, UK: Leeds Books. Blum, L. (1982). Kant’s and Hegel’s Moral Rationalism: A Feminist Perspective. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 12(2), 287-302. doi:10.1080/00455091.1982.10715798 Conway, P., Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 216-35. doi: 10.1037/a0031021 Crabtree, B. F., Miller, W. L. (1992). Doing qualitative research. CA: Sage Publications. Cushman, F., Young, L., Greene, J. D. (2010). Our multi-system moral psychology: Towards a consensus view. In J. Doris (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology (pp. 47-71). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582143.003.0003 Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam. Edwards, C. P. (1979). The comparative study of the development of moral judgment and reasoning. In R. Munroe, R. L. Munroe, B. B. Whiting (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural human development (pp. 501-527). New York: Garland. Edwards, C. P. (1982). Moral development in comparative perspective. In D. A. Wagner H. W. Stevenson (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on child development (pp248-278). San Francisco: Freeman. Edwards, C.P. (1986). Cross cultural research on Kohlberg's stages: The basis for consensus. In S. Modgil C. Modgil (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and Controversy (pp. 419 430). Sussex, England: Falmer Press Limited. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709–724. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.49.8.709 Fischer, K. W., Tangney, J. P. (1995). Self-conscious emotions and the affect revolution: Framework and overview. In J. P. Tangney K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 3–22). New York: Guilford. Foot Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. NY: The Free Press. Fiske, A. P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures--A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 78–88. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.78 Foot, P. (1978). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5-15. doi:10.1093/0199252866.003.0002 Geertz, C. (1974). From the Native's Point of View : On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 28(1), 26-45. doi:10.2307/3822971 Gergen, K. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199846269.001.0001 Gibbs, J. (1977). Kohlberg’s stages of moral development: A constructive critique. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 43-61. doi:10.17763/haer.47.1.x011p7x226k3722x Gibbs, J. C. (1979). Kohlberg’s moral stage theory: A Piagetian revision. Human Development, 22, 89-112. doi: 10.1159/000272431 Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Moral intuition = fast and frugal heuristics? In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, volume 2: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46(2), 107-119. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107 Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvjk2wr9 Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S., Ditto,P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4 Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. doi:10.1037/a0021847 Greene, J. D. (2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 322–323. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004 Greene, J. D. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. New York, NY: Penguin Press. Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144–1154. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004 Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027 Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108. doi:10.1126/science.1062872 Greene, J., Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9 Guglielmo, S. (2015). Moral judgment as information processing: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1637. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01637 Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814 Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 65–72. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon. Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol. 2: The cognitive science of morality : Intuition and diversity (pp. 181–217). Cambridge: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/7573.001.0006 Haidt, J., Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116. doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z Haidt, J., Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus,133(4), 55–66. doi:10.1162/0011526042365555 Hauser, M. D., Cushman, F. A., Young, L., Jin, R., Mikhail, J. M. (2007). A dissociation between moral judgment and justification. Mind and Language, 22(1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00297.x Hempel C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Macmillan. Henrich, J., Heine, S., Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequence: International differences in work related values. London and Beverly Hill: Sage. Huang K, Greene J.D. Bazerman M., (2019) Veil-of-ignorance reasoning favors the greater good. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116(48),23989-23995. doi:10.1073/pnas.1910125116 Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739) Hunt, S. D., Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics.Journal of macromarketing, 6(1), 5-16. doi:10.1177/027614678600600103 Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 944–974. doi:10.1086/228588 Hwang, K. K. (2012). Foundations of Chinese psychology: Confucian social relations. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1439-1_8 Hwang, K.-K. (2019a). A psychodynamic model of self-nature. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 32(3-4), 285–306. doi:10.1080/09515070.2018.1553147 Hwang, K. K. (2019b). Enhancing cultural awareness by the construction of culture-inclusive theories. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(2), 67–80. doi:10.1037/teo0000086 Hwang, K. K. (2020). Escape from Kantian Eurocentric bias in cross-cultural psychology. Culture Psychology, 26(4), 863–878. doi:10.1177/1354067X20922145 Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42366. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042366 Jensen, L.A. (1998). Moral divisions within countries between orthodoxy and progressivism: India and the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 90–107. doi:10.2307/1388031 Jorgensen, G. (2006). Kohlberg and Gilligan: Duet or duel. Journal of Moral Education, 35(2), 179-196. doi:10.1080/03057240600681710 Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697 Kitayama, S. (2002). Culture and basic psychological processes: Toward a system view of culture. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 89-96. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.89 Knobe, J., Buckwalter, W., Nichols, S. B., Robbins, P., Sarkissian, H., Sommers, T. (2012). Experimental philosophy. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 81-99. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100350 Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of thinking and choices in years 10 to 16. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory (pp. 347-480). Chicago: Rand McNally. Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In L. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 151-235). NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-498640-4.50011-1 Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral Development (Vol.1): The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row. Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., Hower, A. (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. In J. A. Meacham (Ed.), Contributions to human development Vol.10 (pp. 151-235).NY: Karger. doi: 10.1159/000408394 Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965 (pp. 91-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139171434.009 Larmore, C. (1990). Political liberalism. Political Theory, 18(3), 339–360. doi:10.1177/0090591790018003001 Lehrer, J. (2009). How we decide. New York: Houghton Mifflin Publishing. Levi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural Anthropology. (C. Jacobson B. G. Schoepf, Trans.) New York: Basic books. Mayo, M. A. Marks, L. J. (1990).An empirical investigation of a general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18, 163-171. doi:10.1007/BF02726432 McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., Tsang, J.A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112–127. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112 McGuire, J., Langdon, R., Coltheart, M., Mackenzie, C. (2009). A reanalysis of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 45(3), 577–580. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.002 Mercier, H., Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57-74. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10000968 Mikhail, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: theory, evidence and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 11(4), 143–152. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007 Mill, J. S. (1998). Utilitarianism. NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1861) Miller, M. B., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Young, L., King, D., Paggi, A., Fabri, M., Polonara, G., Gazzaniga, M. S. (2010). Abnormal moral reasoning in complete and partial callosotomy patients. Neuropsychologia, 48(7), 2215– 2220. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.021 Nisan, M., Kohlberg, L. (1982). University and variation in moral judgment: A longitudinal and cross-sectional study in Turkey. Child Development, 53(4), 865-876. doi:10.2307/1129123 Noddings, N. (1984).Caring: A Feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press. Noddings, N. (1998). Philosophy of Education. Oxford: Westview Press. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. O’Neill, O. (1989). Constructions of reason: Exploration of Kant’s practical philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Ogien, R.,(2015). Human kindness and the smell of warm croissants: an introduction to ethics (M. Thom, Trans.). New York NY: Columbia University Press. doi:10.7312/ogie16922 Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. NY: Free Press. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge Kegan Paul. doi:10.4324/9781315009681 Pogge, T. (2007). John Rawls: His life and theory of justice. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136364.001.0001 Prinz, J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. New York: Oxford University Press. Rawls, J. (1980).Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory. Journal of Philosophy, 77(9), 515-572. doi:10.2307/2025790 Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14(3), 223-251. Rawls, J. (1987). The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7(1), 1-25. doi:10.1093/ojls/7.1.1 Reidenbach, R. E. Robin, D. P. (1988). Some initial steps toward improving the measurement of ethical evaluations of marketing activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 871-879. doi:10.1007/BF00383050 Reidenbach, R. E. Robin, D. P. (1990).Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics,9, 639-653. doi:10.1007/BF00383391 Rest, J. R. (1974). Manual for the defining issue test: An objective test of moral judgment development. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press. Rest, J. R. (1979a). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Rest, J. R. (1979b). Revised manual for the defining issues test: An Objective Test of Moral Judgment Development. Minneapolis, MN: Moral Research Projects. Roccas, S., McCauley, C. (2004). Values and emotions in the relational models. In N. Haslam (Ed.), Relational models theory: A contemporary overview (pp. 263–285). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Ross, W. D. (2002). What makes right acts right? In P. Stratton-Lake (Ed.),The right and thegood (pp. 16-47). Oxford, UK: Clarendon. doi:10.1093/0199252653.003.0002 Said, E. N. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon. Sandel, M. J.(1982).Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schaller, M. Park, J.H. (2011). The behavioral immune system (and why it matters). Current Directions in Psychological Science. 20 (2): 99–103. doi:10.1177/0963721411402596 Shweder, R. A. (2000). The psychology of practice and the practice of the three psychologies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 207-222. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00065 Shweder, R. A., Goodnow, J., Hatano, G., LeVine, R., Markus, H., Miller, P. (1998). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 865–938). New York: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0113 Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). New York, NY: Routledge. Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Young, L., Cushman, F. (2010). Moral intuitions. In J. M. Doris (Ed.), The moral psychology handbook (pp. 246–272). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582143.003.0008 Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3–22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3 Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E. MacGregor, D.G. (2004), Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24: 311-322. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x Snarey, J. R. (1985). Cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: A critical review of Kohlbergian research. Psychological Bulletin, 97(2), 202–232. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.202 Sperber D, Hirschfeld L.A. (2004). The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(1):40‐46. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.002 Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Moral heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 531–542. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000099 Tam, K. K. (2003). Situational influences on moral orientation and moral judgment of the Chinese people: Theoretical exploration and empirical validation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Baptist University. Taylor, C. (1973). Interpretation and the sciences of man. In D. Carr E. S. Casey (Eds.), Explorations in Phenomenology (pp. 47–101). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1999-6_3 Taylor, C. (1985a), Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173490 Taylor, C. (1985b). Introduction. In C. Taylor(Ed.), Human agency and language: Philosophical papers (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173483.001 Taylor, C. (1988). The moral topography of the self. In S. B. Messer, L. A. Sass, R. L. Woolfolk (Eds.), Rutgers symposia on applied psychology, Vol. 2. Hermeneutics and psychological theory: Interpretive perspectives on personality, psychotherapy, and psychopathology (pp. 298–320). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self : The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press. doi:10.1177/004057369104800210 Thomas, B. C., Croft, K. E., Tranel, D. (2011). Harming kin to save strangers: Further evidence for abnormally utilitarian moral judgments after ventromedial prefrontal damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2186–2196. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21591 Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94 (6), 1395-1415. doi:10.2307/796133 Thomson, J. J. (1986). Rights, restitution, and risk: Essays, in moral theory. MA: Harvard University Press. Tietjen, A. M., Walker, L. J. (1985). Moral reasoning and leadership among men in a Papua New Guinea society. Developmental Psychology, 21(6), 982–992. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.21.6.982 Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/8470.001.0001 Tomlinson, P. (1986). Kohlberg’s moral psychology: Any advance on the present stage? In S. Modgil C. Modgil (Eds.) Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and controversy (pp. 107–121). Philadelphia London: Falmer Press. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Turiel, E. (2006). Thought, emotions, and social interactional processes in moral development. In M. Killen J.G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 7–35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Vine, L (1986). Moral maturity in socio-cultural perspective: Are Kohlberg’s stages universal ? In S. Modgil C. Modgil (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and controversy (pp.431-450). Philadelphia London: Falmer Press. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21176 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去相關研究發現,外在脈絡、特別是關係脈絡,對於華人道德判斷有重要影響。然而,這樣的特色也引發出一個疑問,即強調關係特殊性的華人文化,能否發展出Kohlberg道德發展階段論中的普遍性思維?對此本文認為,過去研究多半聚焦在華人道德判斷的外在表層現象,卻未檢驗其內在深層結構,因此才會出現上述爭議。為了說明這個問題,本文援引「脈絡性普遍主義」作為整合性概念架構,主張道德判斷歷程之前階段「外在多元脈絡」引發情感作用,進而產生直覺判斷,但在後階段「內在一元原則」,個體可透過理性反思,檢驗道德原則之普遍性。換言之,個體雖然會依照外在脈絡採取不同判斷傾向,內在仍能以普遍性原則作為基礎進行推論。基於以上論述,本文一共進行四個研究,研究一以質性訪談方式,分析參與者在四項指標中之回答內容,結果發現事件外在脈絡的程度高低以及種類,會影響參與者所採取的倫理學判斷傾向。研究二至研究四則進一步以量化方式,比較參與者對於不同情境脈絡故事的判斷差異與考量因素,結果發現,大學教育程度以上之華人參與者會依照外在脈絡而採取不同的判斷原則,其中又以關係脈絡最具影響性,但另一方面,其內在同時亦可通過普遍性原則檢驗。由此可知,「脈絡性普遍主義」概念可以作為華人道德判斷的解釋架構,其中「普遍性原則」來自康德義務論,與Kohlberg道德發展階段論之高階段預設相符,故可用於說明華人參與者判斷時的普遍性思維原則。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | It was discovered the previous related research of Chinese moral Judgment, the external context, especially the relational contexts, containing a significant influence on Chinese moral Judgment. In the meantime, it also triggers to emphasize the special relationalism in Chinese cultural. Whether it can approach the problem of the universal ethical principle orientation indicated in Kohlberg's stages of moral development. This study acknowledges that most of the previous researches focus on the external phenomenon of Chinese moral Judgment, but did not investigate its internal structure. So, the above-said controversial theories occur. This study cites contextualized Universalism as the integral and conceptual structure. Declaring the early stage of moral Judgment: multiple contexts will create emotional reaction, then creates the intuitive judgment. But in the later stage of structural principle, the individual can react through critical thinking, examining the popularity of the moral Judgment. In other words, individuals will adopt different judgment tendencies in according with the external context. Internally it still can utilize the universal principles as the foundation. Based on the above-mentioned inference, this research proceeded with four studies. The first study was conducted in the form of substantive interviews. After analyzing the participants four indicators content, it is found that the degree and type of the external context of the facts will affect the participants’ Ethics judgment tendency. The second study to the fourth study have been advanced by using the quantitative format. Comparing the participants' judgmental differences and consideration factors under different situational context scenarios. It was detected that the Chinese participants with college degree or higher education level would take different judgmental principles according to the external context, among which the relational contexts are the most influential. On the other hand, it could also be tested by the principle of universality. It is obvious the concept of contextualized Universalism can be used as the interpretation of Chinese moral judgment structure. In which the universal principles are originated from the Kantian Ethics. It matches the pre-set high level moral development evolution. Therefore, it is explanatory Chinese participants’ made judgments by using the universal thinking philosophy. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:28:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2203202120260600.pdf: 2189257 bytes, checksum: c82d804218b69b0a390c2ff9018417da (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景及目的……………………………………………………1 第二節 Kohlberg的道德發展階段論………………………………………6 第三節 道德發展階段論的前提預設………………………………………13 第四節 當代道德心理學理論………………………………………………18 第五節 內在一元性與外在多元性…………………………………………28 第六節 義務論與正義論……………………………………………………36 第七節 康德倫理學…………………………………………………………40 第二章 華人文化中的脈絡性普遍主義…………………………………………45 第一節 華人文化中的普遍性原則…………………………………………45 第二節 道德內在動機………………………………………………………51 第三節 研究問題……………………………………………………………54 第三章 研究設計…………………………………………………………………61 第一節 研究方法……………………………………………………………61 第二節 研究設計……………………………………………………………63 第四章 研究一……………………………………………………………………65 第一節 研究工具……………………………………………………………65 第二節 分析方法……………………………………………………………69 第三節 訪談對象……………………………………………………………70 第四節 資料分析結果………………………………………………………70 第五節 研究一小結…………………………………………………………79 第五章 研究二……………………………………………………………………83 第一節 研究工具……………………………………………………………83 第二節 研究結果……………………………………………………………85 第三節 研究二小結…………………………………………………………87 第六章 研究三……………………………………………………………………89 第一節 研究方法……………………………………………………………90 第二節 研究結果……………………………………………………………94 第三節 研究三小結…………………………………………………………98 第七章 研究四……………………………………………………………………101 第一節 研究方法……………………………………………………………102 第二節 研究結果……………………………………………………………104 第三節 研究四小結…………………………………………………………110 第八章 綜合討論…………………………………………………………………113 第一節 華人文化的脈絡性普遍主義思維…………………………………113 第二節 脈絡化普遍主義在道德發展階段理論的意義……………………115 第三節 研究貢獻與當代相關議題…………………………………………117 第四節 研究結果中的科學哲學意涵………………………………………119 第五節 研究限制與未來研究方向…………………………………………120 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………123 附錄…………………………………………………………………………………139 作者簡歷……………………………………………………………………………165 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 華人文化中之脈絡性普遍主義:情境故事法分析取向 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Contextualized Universalism of Chinese Culture:The Scenario Study Approach | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 葉光輝(Kuang-Hui Yeh) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 韓貴香(Kuei-Hsiang Han),危芷芬(Chih-Fen Wei),符碧真(Bi-Zhen Fu),張仁和(Jen-Ho Chang),陳復(Fu Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 道德判斷,道德發展階段論,脈絡性普遍主義, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | moral judgment,stages of moral development,contextualized universalism, | en |
dc.relation.page | 165 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100798 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-03-24 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-2203202120260600.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.14 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。