請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21166
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳家麟(Chialin Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Mei-Ju Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳美如 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:28:01Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-11-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-10-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
1. 李永琮、羅玉皓(2016),「反向房屋抵押貸款商品結構分析」,《臺大管理論叢》,26 卷2期,頁139-172。 2. 李坤霖(2016),《臺灣銀行業推行不動產逆向抵押貸款實務問題探討》,中山大學高階經營碩士班論文。 3. 李憲宗(2012),《逆向抵押貸款制度運作之政府角色與法規範分析》,臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士論文。 4. 李嘉峯(2011),《從銀行業角度探討逆向抵押貸款在臺灣實行之可行性研究》,中央大學財務金融系碩士在職專班論文。 5. 林志峰(2017),《銀行在逆向貸款的決定因子》,清華大學經營管理碩士在職專班論文。 6. 張雅萍(2016),《高齡化社會的金融創新:逆向抵押貸款商品之研究》,國立中山大學財務管理系碩士論文。 7. 張金鶚(2009),「台灣『以房養老』三方案模式提議」,《「以房養老」逆向抵押貸款方案研討會-美國經驗與台灣模式之探討》,中華民國住宅學會、政大臺灣房地產研究中心、經濟日報主辦,頁28-71。 8. 潘秀菊、李智仁(2010),《以房養老商品-反向抵押貸款制度之理論與實務》,台北:元照出版社。 二、英文部分 1. Bradford Case, Ann B. Schnare (1994), “Preliminary Evaluation of the HECM Reverse Mortgage Program,” https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1540-6229.00636. 2. Catherine Bridge, Mark Mathews, Peter Phibbs, and Toni Adams (2009), “Reverse Mortgages and Older People: Growth Factors and Implications for Retirement Decisions,” Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, AHURI Positioning Paper No. 123. 3. Edward J. Szymanoski, Alven Lam, and Christopher Feather (2017), “Financial Sustainability and the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage: Advancing Fiscal Soundness and Affordable Financing for Senior Homeowners,” Cityscape, 19(1), pp.47-72. 4. Liang Wang, Emiliano A. Valdez, and John Piggott (2007), “Securitization of longevity Risk in Reverse Mortgage,” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1087549_code90650.pdf?abstractid=1087549&mirid=1. 5. Masahiro Kobayashi, Shoichiro Konishi, and Toshihiko Takeishi (2017), “The Reverse Mortgage Market in Japan and Its Challenges,” Cityscape, 19(1), pp.73-97. 6. Mayer C. J., Simons K. V. (1994), “A New Look at Reverse Mortgages: Potential Market and Institutional Constraints,” New England Economic Review, pp.15-26. 7. Ovilia Mitchell, John Piggott (2004), “Unlocking Housing Equity in Japan,” Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research. 8. Richard Reed, Karen M. Gibler (2003), “The Case for Reverse Mortgage in Australia-Applying the USA Experience,” In 9th Annual Pacific Rim Real Estate Society (PRRES) Conference, Brisbanee Australia. 9. Steven F. Venti, David A. Wise (2004), “Aging and Housing Equity: Another Look,” Perspectives on the Economics of Aging, pp.127-180. 10. Wang L, Valdez E, and Piggott J. (2004), “Securitization of Longevity Risk in Reverse mortgages,” Working Paper, University of New South Wales. 三、網站部分 1. 王建民,「逆向抵押貸款-以房養老政策的問題及對策」,國政研究基金會, https://www.npf.org.tw/2/10497。 2. 中央銀行,「對銀行辦理以房養老貸款之看法」,央行理監事會後記者會參考資料, https://www.cbc.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=74268&ctNode=302&mp=20。 3. 朱家儀,「『以房養老』政策是否成功,關鍵在於民眾把房子看成House還是Home」,The lens關鍵評論,https://www.thenewslens.com/article/83517。 4. 肖婕,「2029年澳洲人口或突破3000萬,維州增長最快」,大紀元,http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/18/11/22/n10867587.htm。 5. 李紀珠,「以房養老」逆向抵押貸款國際研討會講演,銀行公會,https://www.ba.org.tw/Notice/Detail/485。 6. 金管會銀行局網站(商業型以房養老貸款), https://www.banking.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=489&parentpath=0,8。 7. 林承峰,「保護老人財產的兩種途徑:簡介信託制度與逆向抵押貸款」,The lens關鍵評論, https://www.thenewslens.com/article/86941。 8. 翁世航,「『以房養老』聽起來不錯,但可能會有這三大風險」,The lens關鍵評論,https://www.thenewslens.com/article/64815。 9. 銀行公會網站(銀行辦理商業型以房養老貸款相關業務資訊彙總表),https://www.ba.org.tw/PublicInformation/Detail/3030?enumtype=ConsumerType&type=HouseLoanInfo。 10. 夢來海外遊學,「澳洲人口有多少?帶你一探究竟,世界上第六大的國家人口」,https://www.dcomeabroad.com/philippines/aus-population/。 11. 澳洲反向抵押貸款介紹,https://simplyretirement.com.au/retirement-finance-reverse-mortgages。 12. 鏡周刊,「退休不愁錢,以房養老新選擇」,https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20180719fin002。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21166 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 依內政部推估,台灣65歲以上人口所占比例,將於民國106年達14%,達到聯合國所稱「高齡社會」的標準,預估於民國114年,老年人口比例將達20.1%,正式邁入超高齡社會。為了解決越來越多老人在經濟安全上的需求,內政部從民國102年起,開始推辦所謂的「不動產逆向抵押制度」試辦方案,也就是俗稱的「以房養老」。面對少子化及老年化社會,國人該思考的問題:老年人的現金流規劃,首要應放在健康照護,而不是支援兒女,及早擬定退休生活的財富規劃,如何開源節流,為了不影響兒女的人生,老一輩需要有自己的財富規劃,而資產配置當中最有價值的即為不動產,宜思考善用不動產的相對保值特性,以挹注自己的退休金,維持一定的退休生活品質。為老年人提供2~6成的退休所得替代率。
早在十七世紀,「以房養老」的思想就已經在地處歐洲的荷蘭萌芽。當時出現了類似於目前的房屋逆向抵押貸款(Reverse Mortgage)契約書。其大致內容為,投資者購買銀髮族自有產權的房屋,並允許銀髮族在其中居住,直至銀髮族去世之後,投資者再收回房屋。此種協定方式,有效地解決了銀髮族養老的資金問題和居住問題,同時減輕了政府的養老負擔。在該產品推出之後,雖然其進展的程度相當緩慢,但是此種新型養老商業模式的提出,受到了許多國家的注意,並在不斷地創新與實務之中,逐漸地在各先進國家之中推廣。其中,尤其以美國的「以房養老」商業模式最為完備和成熟。 另方面,台灣金融資產服務股份有限公司(即金融機構合併法之「公正第三人」)的公正第三人拍賣業務,自公司成立十多年來一直因為無法逕予塗銷假扣押辦理過戶登記而難以推動發展,而「以房養老」業務的債權債務單純,發生假扣押機率甚微,認為是公正第三人拍賣業務未來可努力的方向,「以房養老」業務若欲長久穩定發展,勢必必須重視擔保品處分管道是否順暢,若是按照目前實務,拍賣遺產有所謂「代辦繼承」的問題。公正第三人拍賣業務若想要順利推廣此部分業務,應設法請政府相關單位協力排除問題障礙。 本文亦蒐集近年來執行以房養老商業模式比較成熟的幾個代表性國家,對各個國家不同經驗的研究和學習,歸納出適用於國內的關鍵成功因素,充分地挖掘其重要啟示和借鏡功能。在美國、日本及澳洲等已開發國家行之有年,政府則從社會福利角度出發,由政府負擔違約保險,讓申貸人不因通膨影響生活品質,同時也分散金融機構承接不動產跌價風險,老人將名下具完整產權之不動產抵押設定給金融機構,以取得一筆或每月的現金流,供退休生活使用,維持良好生活品質。外國的「以房養老」實務經驗對於國內銀行開辦「以房養老」的發展具有重要的參考價值,為商業模式建構及執行提供寶貴的經驗借鏡。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | According to the Ministry of the Interior estimates, the proportion of Taiwan’s population aged 65 and over will reach 14% in 2017, meeting the United Nations standard of “old age society”, which is estimated to reach 20.1% of the proportion of the elderly in 2025, officially entering the super-age society. In order to solve the needs of more and more elderly people in economic security, the Ministry of the Interior from2013, began to promote the so-called “Real Estate Reverse Mortgage System” pilot program, also known as “housing for old age”. In the face of decreasing (declining or low) birth rate and geriatric society, the thinking of the problem: the cash flow planning of the elderly, first in health care, not to support children. Early planning of retirement wealth planning, how to get financial resources, in order not to affect the lives of children, the older generation need to have their own wealth planning, and the most valuable asset allocation is real estate, it is appropriate to think about the relative preservation characteristics of real estate, to invest their own pension, to maintain a certain degree of retirement quality of life. Provide the elderly with a replacement rate of 20% to 60% of retirement income.
As early as the seventeenth century, the idea of housing pension has been in the Netherlands in Europe. There was a similar reverse mortgage contract to the present. The general content is that investors buy houses owned by the elder family and allow the elder family to live in it until the elder family dies, the investors to take back the house. This kind of agreement effectively solves the problem of the financial and living problem of the old-age, and reduces the burden of the government’s old-age pension. After the product launch, although the degree of progress is rather slow, but the introduction of this new old-age business model, has been the attention of many countries, and in the continuous innovation and practice, gradually in the advanced countries. Among them, especially in the United States to the housing pension business model is the most complete and mature. On the other hand, “the Fair Third Person Auction Business” of Taiwan Financial Assets Service Co., Ltd. (i.e. ' the Fair Third Person ' in “the Merger Law of Financial Institutions) has been difficult to promote development since the company was founded more than a decade ago because it was unable to sell the false seizure for the registration of the transfer, and the debt of the 'housing pension' business if long-term stable development, it is bound to pay attention to whether the collateral disposition pipeline is smooth, if in accordance with the current practice, auction estate has the so-called 'proxy inheritance' problem. If we want to successfully promote this part of the business, we should try to ask the relevant government units to work together to remove the obstacles to the problem. This paper collects several representative countries that have been more mature in recent years to implement the business model of housing pension, study and study the different experiences of various countries, summarize the general laws applicable to the domestic, and fully excavate its important enlightenment and mirror function. In the United States, Japan and Australia and other developed countries for years, the government will also from the perspective of social welfare, the government to bear the default insurance, so that the applicant will not be due to inflation affect the quality of life, but also to disperse financial institutions to undertake the risk of real estate prices, the elderly will be under the full title of real estate mortgage set to financial institutions, to obtain one or a month's cash flow for retirement and to maintain a good quality of life. Foreign practical experience of “housing pension” has important reference value for the development of “housing pension” for domestic banks, and provides valuable experience for the construction and implementation of business model. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:28:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-P06748028-1.pdf: 1709868 bytes, checksum: 424502c158c0cdf3b276684e7d2b5e10 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iv 目錄 vii 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 x 第一章 緒論 1 第一節、研究背景及動機 1 第二節、研究問題及對象 3 第三節、研究方法及架構 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節、國內文獻綜述 5 第二節、國外文獻綜述 8 第三節、小結 13 第三章 「以房養老」-逆向抵押貸款概述 14 第一節、「以房養老」-逆向抵押貸款的簡介 14 第二節、「以房養老」-逆向抵押貸款的特色 20 第三節、「以房養老」-逆向抵押貸款的發展條件 24 第四節、國內「以房養老」-逆向抵押貸款的推動歷程及現況 26 第四章 外國辦理「以房養老」-逆向抵押貸款的商業模式及關鍵成功因素 34 第一節、美國房屋逆向抵押貸款的商業模式及關鍵成功因素 34 第二節、日本房屋逆向抵押貸款的商業模式及關鍵成功因素 43 第三節、澳洲房屋逆向抵押貸款的商業模式及關鍵成功因素 50 第四節、外國商業模式的綜合比較 53 第五章 分析與建議 56 第一節、國外「以房養老」措施關鍵成功因素的綜合分析 56 第二節、國內「以房養老」措施的國外參考借鏡及建議 59 第三節、小結 63 第六章 結論 64 第一節、研究限制 64 第二節、綜合建議以代結論 65 參考文獻 69 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 「以房養老」逆向抵押貸款商業模式之探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | “Housing Pension”-the Discussion on the Business Model of Reverse Mortgage | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 吳玲玲(Ling-Ling Wu) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許文馨 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 以房養老,逆向抵押貸款,關鍵成功因素, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | House pension,Reverse mortgage,Key success factors, | en |
dc.relation.page | 71 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201904207 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-10-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學組 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.67 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。