Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20860Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳郁蕙(Yu-Hui Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guan-Rui Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳冠睿 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:07:15Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-07-07 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-06-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 內政部地政司，土地法第106條之解釋函令。
(https://www.land.moi.gov.tw/law/chhtml/openframe.asp?lid=145) (2017/06/28) 內政部地政司，非都市土地編定與管制之各種使用地編定。 (http://www.land.moi.gov.tw/chhtml/content.asp?cid=87&mcid=70) (2017/02/04) 內政部地政司，都市地區地價指數(第47期)。 內政部地政司，農地重劃區農路水路工程設施規劃設計標準。 (https://www.land.moi.gov.tw/law/pda/) (2017/03/30) 白溪河，2013。「農業用地興建農舍辦法修正條文草案對農地價格的影響」。碩士論文，國立中興大學應用經濟學系。 任立中、林佩瑩，2013。「台北市傳統零售市場消費型態之分析 - 分量迴歸模型之應用」，『行銷科學學報』。1(9)，77-108。 行政院農業委員會，2011。『99年度農業統計年報』。臺北：行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會，2013。『101年度農業統計年報』。臺北：行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會，2014。『102年度農業統計年報』。臺北：行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會，2015。『103年度農業統計年報』。臺北：行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會，2016。『104年度農業統計年報』。臺北：行政院農業委員會。 吳功顯，2007。「農地價格之組成及其影響因素之探討」，『華岡農科學報』。20期，1-30。 吳彩珠、林峰田、林森田、許元綸，2013。「宜蘭農地宅舍分布型態之變遷與其影響因素之探討」。都市與計劃，40卷，1期，31-57。 李至千，2015。「自然景觀與農地管制如何影響農地價格─花蓮縣的個案」。碩士論文，國立政治大學地政學系。 李承嘉，2012。「臺灣土地政策析論─從改革到投機的福爾摩沙」。五南圖書出版公司出版。 李昌鴻，2015。「影響臺灣農業收入之因素及政策意涵」。碩士論文，國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系暨研究所。 李素馨、林敬妤、吳治達，2012。「都市邊緣農村地景破碎化研究」。臺灣土地研究，15卷，2期，59-85。 周天穎、葉美伶、吳政庭、簡致遠，2011。「輕輕鬆鬆學ArcGIS10」。儒林圖書公司出版。 宜蘭縣政府農業處官方網站，農產訊息專區。 (http://agri.e-land.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=4EDC55BD1CD365CB) (2017/02/19) 林正木，2011。「宜蘭縣原住民農產業現況與發展」。『花蓮區農業專訊』。78期，22-25。 林國慶，1993。「臺灣農地價格之分析」，國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系暨研究所。 林森田，2010。『土地經濟學』，巨流政大書城總經銷。 法務部全國法規資料庫，土地稅法。 (http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=G0340096) (2017/06/28) 法務部全國法規資料庫，土地稅法施行細則。 (http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=G0340097) (2017/06/28) 法務部全國法規資料庫，平均地權條例。 (http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=D0060009)(2017/06/28) 法務部全國法規資料庫，農業用地作農業使用認定及核發證明辦法。 (http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=M0020015) (2017/06/28) 法務部全國法規資料庫，農業用地興建農舍辦法。 (http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=M0110013) (2017/06/28) 法務部全國法規資料庫，農業發展條例。 (http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=M0020001)(2017/06/28) 法務部全國法規資料庫，農業發展條例施行細則。 (http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=M0020002) (2017/06/28) 凃雅珍，2008。「風水對不同住宅價格影響之研究：分量迴歸之應用」。碩士論文，國立政治大學經濟學系。 殷章甫，1984。「中國之土地改革」，中央文物供應社，71-76。 殷章甫，2010。『土地經濟學』，五南圖書出版股份有限公司出版。 張基湛，1986。「臺灣農地價格變動之研究」，『台銀季刊』。37(4)，305-343。 梁維真，2015。「臺灣農地法拍價格之決定因素」。碩士論文，國立政治大學地政學系。 郭大玄，2013。『臺灣地理：自然，社會與空間的圖像』，第51卷。五南圖書出版股份有限公司出版。 陳世弘、姚希聖，2016。「都市遠郊化發展趨勢下之鄉村地區農地價格影響因素之探討─台南市為例」。2016第十屆全國房地產經營管理研討會。 陳明燦，1998。「農地價格, 選擇價值與農地政策不同類型農業區之實證研究」，『法商學報』。34期，209-234。 陳冠廷，2012。「GIS空間迴歸分析地價變異-以台南市東區為例」。碩士論文，國立成功大學地球科學系。 黃友宣，2012。「臺灣農地價格區位分析」。碩士論文，國立中興大學土壤環境科學系。 楊義隆，2008。「臺灣光復後的土地改革」，『空大學訊』。395期，76-83。 葉美容，2012。「以混和多平準決策探討臺灣農地價格之影響因素」。碩士論文，逢甲大學土地管理學系。 廖安定，2011。「農地政策之研究」，財團法人農村發展基金會官方網站。(https://www.rdf.org.tw/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/AGRPOLICY05.pdf)(2017/06/27) 廖崇智，2014。「提綱挈領學統計第五版」。鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司出版。 劉昆霈，2014。「農地成交價格與收益價格差距之研究」。碩士論文，國立政治大學地政學系。Anderson, J. E., 2012. “Agricultural Use-Value Property Tax Assessment: Estimation and Policy Issues,” Public Budgeting and Finance, 32 (4), 71–94. Anderson, J. E., 1993. “Use-value Property Tax Assessment: Effects on Land Development,” Land Economics, 69 (3), 263–269. Anderson, K., and Weinhold, D., 2008. “Valuing Future Development Rights: The Costs of Conservation Easements,” Ecological Economics, 68(1), 437-446. Barichello, R. R., R. M. Porter and G. C. van Kooten., 1995. “Institutions, Economic Incentives and Sustainable Rural Land Use in British Columbia,” Managing Natural Resources In British Columbia. Markets, Regulations, and Sustainable Development, 7-53. Barnard, C. H., 2000. “Agriculture and the Rural Economy: Urbanization Affects a Large Share of Farmland,” Rural Conditions and Trends, 10(2), 57–63. Beaton, P., 1991. “The Impact of Regional Land Use Controls on Property Values: The Case of the New Jersey Pinelands,” Land Economics, 67 (2), 172–194. Blewett, R. A., and Lane, J. I., 1988. “Development rights and the Differential Assessment of Agricultural Land: Fractional Valuation of Farmland is Ineffective for Preserving Open Space and Subsidizes Speculation,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 47(2), 195-205. Borchers, A., Ifft, J., and Kuethe, T., 2014. “Linking the Price of Agricultural Land to Use Values and Amenities,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(5), 1307-1320. Brabec, E., and Smith, C., 2002. “Agricultural Land Fragmentation: The Spatial Effects of Three Land Protection Strategies in the Eastern United States,” Landscape and Urban Planning, 58(2), 255-268. Brueckner, J. K., 1990. “Growth Controls and Land Values in an Open City,” Land Economics, 66(3), 237-248. Capozza, D. R., and Helsley, R. W., 1989. “The Fundamentals of Land Prices and Urban Growth,” Journal of Urban Economics, 26(3), 295-306. Cavailh`es, J. and P. Wavresky., 2003. “Urban Influences on Periurban Farmland Prices,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, 30 (3), 333–357. Chang, K.T., 2016. “Introduction to Geographic Information Systems,” 8th. Eduition, McGraw -Hill Education, New York, NY. Chicoine, D. L., 1981. “Farmland Values at the Urban Fringe: An Analysis of Sale Prices,” Land Economics, 57(3), 353-362. Choumert, J., and Phélinas, P., 2015. “Determinants of Agricultural Land Values in Argentina,” Ecological Economics, 110, 134-140. Chrzanowska, M., 2016. “Spatial Analysis of Agricultural Land Prices by Regions in Poland,” Economic Science for Rural Development Conference Proceedings, 42, 22-29. Cromartie, John, and Shawn Bucholtz., 2008. “Defining the ‘Rural’ in Rural America,” Amber Waves, 6 (3), 28–34. Conklin, H. E., and Lesher, W. G., 1977. “Farm-value Assessment as a Means for Reducing Premature and Excessive Agricultural Disinvestment in Urban Fringes,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(4), 755-759. Deaton, B. J., and Vyn, R. J., 2010. “The Effect of Strict Agricultural Zoning on Agricultural Land Values: The Case of Ontario’s Greenbelt,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 141-155. Dehring, C. A., and Lind, M. S., 2007. “Residential Land-use Controls and Land Values: Zoning and Covenant Interactions,” Land Economics, 83(4), 445-457. Delbecq, B. A., Kuethe, T. H., and Borchers, A. M., 2014. “Identifying the Extent of the Urban Fringe and its Impact on Agricultural Land Values,” Land Economics, 90(4), 587-600. Devadoss, S., and Manchu, V., 2007. “A Comprehensive Analysis of Farmland Value Determination : A County-level Analysis,” Applied Economics, 39(18), 2323-2330 Dixit, A. K. and R. S. Pindyck., 1995. “The Options Approach to Capital Investment.,” Harvard Business Review, 73 (3), 105–115. Duke, J.M., and L. Lynch., 2006. “Farmland Retention Techniques: Property Rights Implications and Comparative Evaluation,” Land Economics, 82 (2), 189-213. Eagle, A. J., Eagle, D. E., Stobbe, T. E., and van Kooten, G. C., 2015. “Farmland Protection and Agricultural Land Values at the Urban-rural Fringe: British Columbia’s Agricultural Land Reserve,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(1), 282-298. Elad, R. L., I. D. Clifton and J. E. Epperson., 1994. “Hedonic Estimation Applied to the Farmland Market in Georgia,” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 26 (2), 351–366. Faux, J., and Perry, G. M., 1999. “Estimating Irrigation Water Value Using Hedonic Price Analysis: A Case Study in Malheur County, Oregon,” Land Economics, 440-452. Feichtinger, P., and Salhofer, K., 2013. “ A Spatial Analysis of Agricultural Land Prices in Bavaria,” Factor Markets: Comparative Analysis of Factor Markets for Agricuture across the Member States. Factor Markets Working Paper, 50. Flanders, A., White, F. C., and Escalante, C. L., 2004. “Equilibrium of Land Values from Agricultural and General Economic Factors for Cropland and Pasture Capitalization in Georgia,” Journal of Agribusiness, 22(1), 49-60. Gardner, K., and Barrows, R., 1985. “The Impact of Soil Conservation Investments on Land Prices,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(5), 943-947. Goodwin, B. K., Mishra, A. K., and Ortalo-Magné, F. N., 2003. “What's Wrong with Our Models of Agricultural Land Values?,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(3), 744-752. Hardie, I. W., Parks, P. J., and van Kooten, G. C., 2004. “Land Use Decisions and Policy at the Intensive and Extensive Margins,” The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2004/2005, 101. Henderson, J., and Moore, S., 2006. “The Capitalization of Wildlife Recreation Income Into Farmland Values,” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 38(3), 597-610. Henneberry, D. M. and R. L. Barrows., 1990. “Capitalization of Exclusive Agricultural Zoning Into Farmland Prices,” Land Economics , 66 (3), 249–258. Herriges, J. A., Shogren, J. F., and Barickman, N. E., 1992. “The Implicit Value of Corn Base Acreage,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(1), 50-58. Huang, H., Miller, G. Y., Sherrick, B. J., and Gomez, M. I., 2006. “Factors Influencing Illinois Farmland Values,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(2), 458-470. Isgin, T., and Forster, D. L., 2006. “A Hedonic Price Analysis of Farmland Option Premiums Under Urban Influences,” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54(3), 327-340. Jaeger, W. K., Plantinga, A. J., and Grout, C. 2012. “How has Oregon's Land Use Planning System Affected Property Values?,” Land Use Policy, 29(1), 62-72.- Kline, J.D., and D. Wichelns., 1996. “Public Preferences Regarding the Goals of Farmland Preservation Programs,” Land Economics, 72 (4), 538-549. Kline, J.D., 2005. “Forest and Farmland Conservation Effects of Oregon’s Land-use Planning Program,” Environmental Management, 35 (4), 368–80. Koenker, R., and Bassett Jr, G., 1978. “Regression Quantiles,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 33-50. Koenker, R., and Hallock, K., 2001. “Quantile Regression: An Introduction,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 43-56. Kong, F., Yin, H., and Nakagoshi, N., 2007. “Using GIS and Landscape Metrics in the Hedonic Price Modeling of the Amenity Value of Urban Green Space: A Case Study in Jinan City, China,” Landscape and Urban Planning, 79(3), 240-252. Li, S., Zhao, Z., Du, Q., and Qiao, Y., 2016. “A GIS-and Fuzzy Set-Based Online Land Price Evaluation Approach Supported by Intelligence-Aided Decision-Making,” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(7), 126. Livanis, G., Moss, C. B., Breneman, V. E., and Nehring, R. F., 2006. “Urban Sprawl and Farmland Prices,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(4), 915-929. Liu, X., and Lynch, L., 2011. “Do Zoning Regulations Rob Rural Landowners' Equity?,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(1), 1-25. Lynch, L., Gray, W., and Geoghegan, J., 2007. “Are Farmland Preservation Program Easement Restrictions Capitalized into Farmland Prices? What can a Propensity Score Matching Analysis Tell Us?,” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 29(3), 502-509. Maddison, D., 2000., “A Hedonic Analysis of Agricultural Land Prices in England and Wales,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, 27(4), 519-532. Maddison, D., 2009. “A Spatio‐temporal Model of Farmland Values,” Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(1), 171-189. Marx, K., 2010. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. In Marx Today , Palgrave Macmillan US.,91-94. Melichar, E., 1979. “Capital Gains Versus Current Income in the Farming Sector,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(5), 1085-1092. Merton, R. C. 1998. “Applications of Option-pricing Theory: Twenty-five Years Later,” American Economic Review, 88 (3), 323–49. Nelson, A. C., 1992. “Preserving Prime Farmland in the Face of Urbanization: Lessons from Oregon,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(4), 467-488. Nickerson, C. J., and Lynch, L., 2001. “The Effect of Farmland Preservation Programs on Farmland Prices,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(2), 341-351. Nickerson, C., Morehart, M., Kuethe, T., Beckman, J., Ifft, J., & Williams, R., 2012. “Trends in US Farmland Values and Ownership,” Economic Information Bulletin No. 92. Washington, DC : USDA Economic Research Service. Nivens, H. D., Kastens, T. L., Dhuyvetter, K. C., and Featherstone, A. M., 2002. “Using Satellite Imagery in Predicting Kansas Farmland Values,” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 464-480. Palmquist, R. B., and Danielson, L. E., 1989. “A Hedonic Study of the Effects of Erosion Control and Drainage on Farmland Values,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(1), 55-62. Plantinga, A. J. 1998. “The Optimal Timber Rotation: An Option Value Approach,” Forest Science, 44(2), 192–202. Plantinga, A. J., and Miller, D. J., 2001. “Agricultural Land Values and the Value of Rights to Future Land Development,” Land Economics, 77(1), 56-67. Plantinga, A. J., R. N. Lubowski and R. N. Stavins., 2002. “The Effects of Potential Land Development on Agricultural Land Prices,” Journal of Urban Economics, 52, 561–581. Reydon, B. P., Plata, L. E. A., Sparovek, G., Goldszmidt, R. G. B., and Telles, T. S., 2014. “Determination and Forecast of Agricultural Land Prices,” Nova Economia, 24(2), 389-408. Ricardo, D., 1821. On The Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation. John Murray. Saizen, I., Mizuno, K., and Kobayashi, S., 2006. “Effects of Land-use Master Plans in the Metropolitan Fringe of Japan,” Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4), 411-421. Schilling, B. J., Sullivan, K. P., and Duke, J. M., 2013. “Do Residual Development Options Increase Preserved Farmland Values,” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 38(3), 327-343. Sklenicka, P., Molnarova, K., Pixova, K. C., and Salek, M. E., 2013. “Factors Affecting Farmland Prices in the Czech Republic,” Land Use Policy, 30(1), 130-136. Stobbe, T. E. 2008. “The Economics and Externalities of Agricultural Land in the Urban Fringe,” Ph.D.dissertation, University of Victoria, Canada. Taylor, M. R., and Brester, G. W., 2005. “Noncash Income Transfers and Agricultural Land Values,” Review of Agricultural Economics, 526-541. Troncoso, J. L., Aguirre, M., Manriquez, P., Labarra, V., and Ormazábal, Y., 2010. “The Influence of Physical Attributes on the Price of Land: The Case of the Province of Talca, Chile,” Ciencia e investigación agraria, 37(3), 105-112. Vaillancourt, F., and Monty, L., 1985. “The Effect of Agricultural Zoning on Land Prices, Quebec, 1975-1981,” Land Economics, 61(1), 36-42. Wasson, J. R., McLeod, D. M., Bastian, C. T., and Rashford, B. S., 2013. “The Effects of Environmental Amenities on Agricultural Land Values,” Land Economics, 89(3), 466-478. Xu, F., Mittelhammer, R. C., and Barkley, P. W., 1993. “Measuring the Contributions of Site Characteristics to the Value of Agricultural Land, ” Land Economics, 69(4), 356-369. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20860 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 農地作為農業生產的重要因素，其市場價格的高低將直接攸關著農民是否有能力購買農地從事農業生產，更進階的影響著臺灣整體的農業經營生態與發展前景，因此市場價格是否呈現合理反映農業產值的樣貌是個值得討論的議題。
本研究運用多種類型的資料庫綜合分析農地價格與農地價值，處理方式以「兩者相除之比率」做為分析農地交易點位之價格價值扭曲程度之依據，且選定受都市化衝擊的「宜蘭縣」與傳統農業為主的「雲林縣」兩個地區進行比較。資料來源包括以不動產實際交易登錄資訊選擇農地交易點位與農地市場價格水準，以農林漁牧業普查資料推估各個研究地區之村里農業產值來近似為農地價值。接著參照過往相關文獻選取了農作物適栽性等級、灌溉排水條件、農作物年價格變化率、土地使用分區管制之分區類型、至都市計畫區之距離、至最近道路之路寬、地籍複雜程度與交易當期房貸指數做為自變數，搭配地理資訊系統之應用後，對每個農地交易點的價格價值扭曲程度進行分量迴歸模型之統計，以估算對於宜蘭地區與雲林地區來說，影響兩者的因素是否有相同或相異之處。 實證結果發現，兩個研究地區之農地價格價值扭曲程度的分布呈現越靠近都會區差異越大之趨勢。土地使用分區管制與路寬、至最近溝渠等區位條件對於兩地區均呈顯著。然而，宜蘭地區因距離大臺北都會區較近，除了扭曲程度普遍較雲林地區為高之外，對於土壤的肥沃程度、農作物年價格變化率也有較明顯的影響；反觀雲林地區由於是傳統農業生產地區，農作物價格年變化率之效果不明顯，土壤越肥沃之農地反而越能弭平扭曲程度，足見兩個研究地區之相同與相異之處。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Farmland is an important factor in the agricultural production process, and its price on the market directly relates to whether the farmers can afford in order to produce or not. Besides, it influences overall agricultural management and development outlook. Therefore, whether the price of farmland reasonably reflects the agricultural output is a topic worth discussing.
This study uses various types of databases to analyze farmland prices and farmland values comprehensively. The approach is based on the 'ratio of the two divisions' for analyzing the price-value distortion level of farmland transactions.By setting two study areas - Yilan County(which is affected by the impact of urbanization) and Yunlin County(which is traditional agricultural area), the sources of the data including the real estate transactions information to get farmland transactions and farmland market prices, agriculture and forestry fishery census data to estimate the village-base agricultural production value. Subsequently, use the range of crop adaptability, irrigation and drainage conditions, crop prices change rate, land use zoning types, distance to urban planning area, width of the nearest road, land blocks and the current mortgage index of the transaction as independent variables, with the application of geographic information system as references, then analyze the price-value distortion level of Yilan County and Yunlin County via quantile regression method. The empirical result shows that the distribution of the price-value distortion level of farmlands in the two areas is more distorted near the metropolitan area. Land use control, road width, distance to the nearest ditch and other location conditions for both regions were significant. However, Yilan County is closer to the Great Taipei Metropolitan area, in addition to the degree of distortion is generally higher than Yunlin County, the fertility of the soil and the crop prices change rate also have more significant impacts. In contrast, because Yunlin County is a traditional agricultural production area, the crop prices change rate has no obvious effect; the more fertile of the soil, the more able to balance the degree of distortion, which shows that two areas have some similar and different aspects. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:07:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04627009-1.pdf: 6696340 bytes, checksum: 7339fa632a4ba66bb26d47155361e81f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
謝辭 ii 摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 目錄 v 表目錄 vii 圖目錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究設計與架構 4 第三節 研究方法與步驟 7 第四節 研究章節與流程 8 第二章 農地之定義暨我國農地政策演變概況 11 第一節 農地之定義 11 第二節 我國農地階段性政策演變概述 19 第三節 我國耕地面積歷年變化情形 24 第四節 研究地區耕地面積歷年變化情形 27 第三章 研究地區農地交易與主要農作物統計 29 第一節 研究地區農地篩選流程 29 第二節 研究地區農地交易筆數統計 31 第三節 研究地區農地交易平均價格統計 34 第四節 研究地區各鄉鎮市主要農作物統計 38 第五節 小結 42 第四章 文獻回顧 43 第一節 地租理論之相關文獻 43 第二節 影響農地價格決定因素之相關文獻 46 第三節 政策影響農地價格或利用之相關文獻 50 第四節 不動產領域結合地理資訊系統之相關文獻 56 第五節 小結 58 第五章 研究方法 59 第一節 地理資訊系統 59 第二節 普通最小平方迴歸分析 64 第三節 分量迴歸模型 66 第四節 小結 67 第六章 資料來源與資料處理 69 第一節 不動產成交案件實際資訊之資料變數定義 69 第二節 農地價格與農業產值之資料處理 71 第三節 影響農地價格與農業產值之決定因素 78 第四節 小結 87 第七章 實證結果與分析 89 第一節 地理資訊系統之交易點位結果展列 89 第二節 統計迴歸實證模型之設定 107 第三節 普通最小平方法迴歸模型之實證分析 108 第四節 分量迴歸模型之實證分析 111 第五節 小結 129 第八章 結論與建議 131 第一節 結論 131 第二節 建議、研究限制與後續研究方向 135 參考文獻 139 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 影響因素 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 農地價格 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 農地價值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 地理資訊系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 分量迴歸模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Farmland values | en |
| dc.subject | Influential factors | en |
| dc.subject | Quantile regression model | en |
| dc.subject | Geographic Information System | en |
| dc.subject | Farmland prices | en |
| dc.title | 影響農地價格與價值比率之因素—以宜蘭縣與雲林縣為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Factors Influencing Price-Value Ratio of Farmland: Cases Study on Yilan and Yunlin Counties | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳雅惠(Ya-Hui Chen),李俊霖(Chun-Lin Lee) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 農地價格,農地價值,地理資訊系統,分量迴歸模型,影響因素, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Farmland prices,Farmland values,Geographic Information System,Quantile regression model,Influential factors, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 145 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701168 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-06-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 農業經濟學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf Restricted Access | 6.54 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.