請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20431
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林乃君 | |
dc.contributor.author | Zi-Jie Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王梓傑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T02:48:29Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王添成。2005。茄科蔬菜病害。台灣農家要覽:農作篇 (三):43-47。行政院農業委員會。
江幸鎂。2012。內共生菌應用於香蕉之生物防治及生長促進之研究。中興大學生命科學院碩士在職專班碩士論文。 呂昀陞。2003。鑑定及偵測茄科植物細菌性斑點病菌 Xanthomonas vesicatoria 之聚合酵素連鎖反應技術。國立中興大學植物病理學研究所碩士論文。臺中,臺灣。 林天枝及洪澨堂。1989。夏季番茄新品種「台中亞蔬四號」之育成。臺中區農業改良場研究彙報 25: 55-64。 陳正次。2005。番茄。台灣農家要覽:農作篇 (二):427-436。行政院農業委員會。 許秀惠、許馨云、葉姿瑩、王三太。2016。台灣抗青枯病茄子根砧之研究進展。台灣重要植物病原細菌與菌質體研討會專刊:104-118。國立中興大學植物病理學系。 彭德昌、陳哲民。1987。番茄之栽培與管理。花蓮區農業推廣簡訊 4(4):11-14。行政院農業委員會花蓮區農業改良場。 張碧芳。2002。鐮胞菌的分子檢測實務—以香蕉黃葉病菌為例。植物重要防檢疫疫病診斷鑑定技術研習會專刊:83-98。行政院農業委員會動植物防疫檢疫局。 曾國欽。2016。台灣重要植物病原細菌之診斷與管理。台灣重要植物病原細菌與菌質體研討會專刊:1-11。國立中興大學植物病理學系。 寧方俞、曾國欽。2012。鑑定及檢測茄科植物細菌性斑點病菌 Xanthomonas perforans 之聚合酵素連鎖反應技術及台灣 X. perforans 菌株之多型性分析。國立中興大學植物病理學研究所碩士論文。 戴振洋。2009。設施番茄介質耕栽培技術。台中區農業技術專刊:173。行政院農業委員會台中區農業改良場。 鐘珮哲、黃勝泉、蔡正賢、吳添益、張訓堯、張素貞、吳登楨。2013。草莓健康管理生產體系之研究。102 年度重點作物健康管理生產體系及關鍵技術之研發成果研討會論文集:46-57。行政院農業委員會農業試驗所。 Abdullah H. and Sijam K. 1992. Effect of selected vegetable crops on bacterial wilt pathogen population and their use in crop rotation programmes for bacterial wilt disease control. Acta Horticulture 292: 161-165. Andrews J. H. 1992. Biological control in the phyllosphere. Annu Rev Phytopathol 30: 603-635. DOI:10.1146/annurev.phyto.30.1.603. Arnold A. E. and Lutzoni F. 2007. Diversity and host range of foliar fungal endophytes: are tropical leaves biodiversity hotspots? Ecology 88: 541-549. Ayana G. and Fininsa C.2016. Effect of crop rotation on tomato bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) and survival of the pathogen in the rhizospheres and roots of different crops in Ethiopia. Int J Phytopathol 05: 81-88. Bakker P. A. H. M., Pierterse C. M. J., van Loon L. C. 2007. Induced systemic resistance by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 97: 239-243. Beneduzi A., Ambrosini A., Passaglia L. M. P. 2012. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet Mol Biol 35: 1044-1051. Bertani G. 1951. Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 62: 293-300. Bochner B. R. and Savageau M. A. 1977 Generalized indicator plate for genetic, metabolic and taxonomic studies with microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 33: 434-444. Cardinale M., Ratering S., Suarez C., Montoya A. M. Z., Geissler-Plaum R., Schnell S. 2015. Paradox of plant growth promotion potential of rhizobacteria and their actual promotion effect on growth of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under salt stress. Microbiol Res 181: 22-32. Caron M., Patten C. L., Ghosh S., Glick B. R. 1995. Effects of the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12–2 on the physiology of canola roots. Plant Growth Regul 23: 297-302. Chen W. M., de Faria S. M., Chou J. H., James E. K., Elliott G. N., Sprent J. I., et al. 2008. Burkholderia sabiae sp. nov., isolated from root nodules of Mimosa caesalpiniifolia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 2174-2179. Chen X., Pizzatti C., Bonaldi M., Saracchi M., Erlacher A., Kunova A., Berg G., Cortesi P. 2016. Biological control of lettuce drop and host plant colonization by rhizospheric and endophytic streptomycetes. Front Microbiol 7: 714. Clay K. 1988. Fungal endophytes of grasses: a defensive mutualism between plants and fungi. Ecology 69: 10-16. Clay K. and Schardl C. 2002. Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. Am Nat 160: 99-127. Colburn-Clifford J. M., Scherf J. M., Allen C. 2010. Ralstonia solanacearum Dps contributes to oxidative stress tolerance and to colonization of and virulence on tomato plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 7392-7399. Compant S., Nowak J., Coenye T., Clément C., Ait Barka E. 2008. Diversity and occurrence of Burkholderia spp. in the natural environment. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32: 607-626. Conn V. M., Walker A. R., Franco C. M. M. 2007. Endophytic actinobacteria induce defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 21: 208-218. Elliott G. N., Chen W. M., Chou J. H., Wang H. C., Sheu S. Y., Perin L., et al. 2007. Burkholderia phymatum is a highly effective nitrogen-fixing symbiont of Mimosa spp. and fixes nitrogen ex planta. New Phytol 173: 168-80. Espinosa-Urgel M., Kolter R., Ramos J.L. 2002. Root colonization by Pseudomonas putida: love at first sight. Microbio 148: 341-343. Feng H., Li Y., Liu Q. 2013. Endophytic bacterial communities in tomato plants with differential resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum. Afr J Microbiol Res 7 ): 1311-1318. Figueroa-Lopez A. M., Cordero-Ramirez J. D., Martinez-Alvarez J. C., Lopez-Meyer M., Lizarraga-Sanchez G. J., Felix-Gastelum R., Castro-Martinez C., Maldonado-Mendoza I. E. 2016. Rhizospheric bacteria of maize with potential for biocontrol of Fusarium verticillioides. SpringerPlus 5: 330-342. Gardner M. W. and Kendrick J. B. 1921. Bacterial spot of tomato. J Agr Res 21: 123-256. Gillis M., Trân Van V., Bardin R., Goor M., Hebbar P., Willems A., Segers P., Kersters K., Heulin T., Fernandez M. P. 1995. Polyphasic taxonomy in the genus Burkholderia leading to an emended description of the genus and proposition of Burkholderia vietnamiensis. sp. nov. for N2-fixing isolates from rice in Vietnam. J Syst Evol Microbiol 45: 274-289. Glick B. R., Penrose D. M., Li J. 1998. A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria. J Theor Biol 190: 63-68. Glick B. R. 2015. Beneficial plant-bacterial interactions. Govindarajan M., Balandreau J., Kwon S-W., Weon H-Y., Lakshminarasimhan C. 2008. Effects of the inoculation of Burkholderia vietnamensis and related endophytic diazotrophic bacteria on grain yield of rice. Microb Ecol 55: 21-37. Hall J. A., Peirson D., Ghosh S., Glick B. R. 1996. Root elongation in various agronomic crops by the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12–2. Isr J Plant Sci 44: 37-42. Harman G. E. 2011. Multifunctional fungal plant symbionts: new tools toenhance plant growth and productivity. New Phytol 189: 647–49. Hawksworth D. L. 1991. The fungal dimension of biodiversity: magnitude, significance, and conservation. Mycol Res 95: 641-655. Hayakawa M. and Nonomura H. 1987. Humic acid-vitamin agar, a new medium for the selective isolation of soil actinomycetes. J Ferment Technol 65: 501-509. Henrici A. T. and Skinner C. E. 1947. Henrici's Molds, Yeasts, and Actinomycetes: A Handbook for Students of Bacteriology. JAMA. 1947; 134:1444. Herron P. R., Wellington M. H. 1990. New method for extraction of streptomycete spores from soil and application to the study of lysogeny in sterile amended and nonsterile soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 1406-1412. Hesse U., Schöberlein W., Wittenmayer L., Forster K., Warnstorff K. 2005. Influence of water supply and endophyte infection (Neotyphodium spp.) on vegetative and reproductive growth of two Lolium perenne L. genotypes. Eur J Agron 22: 45-54. Hoagland D. R. and Arnon D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. University of California, College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station. Davis, CA. Huang X.F., Zhou D., Guo J., Manter D.K., Reardon K.F., Vivanco J.M. 2015. Bacillus spp. from rainforest soil promote plant growth under limited nitrogen conditions. J Appl Microbiol. 118: 672-84. Jacobson C. B., Pasternak J. J., Glick B. R. 1994. Partial purification and characterization of ACC deaminase from the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12–2. Can J Microbiol 40: 1019-1025. Jha P. N. and Kumar A. 2007. Endophytic colonization of Typha australis by a plant growth promoting bacterium Klebsiella oxytoca GR-3. J Appl Microbiol 103: 1311-1320. João L. A., Welington L. A., Paulo T. L. 2016. The diversity of citrus endophytic bacteria and their interactions with Xylella fastidiosa and host plants. Genet Mol Biol 39 : 476-491. Jones J. B. 1930. Tomato plant culture: in the field, greenhouse, and home garden: 18-23. Jones J. B., Zitter T. A., Momol T. M., Miller S. A. 2014. Compendium of tomato diseases and pest: 55-60. Kado C. I., Heskett M. G. 1970. Selective media for isolation of Agrobacterium, Corynebacterium, Erwinia, Pseudomonas, and Xanthomonas. Phytopathology 60: 969-976. Kane K. H. 2011. Effects of endophyte infection on drought stress tolerance of Lolium perenne accessions from the Mediterranean region. Environ Exp Bot 71: 337-344. Katan J. 1981. Solar heating (solarization) of soil for control of soil-borne pests. Annu Rev Phytopathol 19: 211-236. Kelman A. 1954. The relationship of pathogenicity in Pseudomonas solanacearum to colony appearance on tetrazolium medium. Phytopathology 44: 693-695. Khan A. L., Hussain J., Al-Harrasi A., Al-Rawahi A., Lee I-J. 2015. Endophytic fungi: resource for gibberellins and crop abiotic stress resistance. Crit Rev Biotechnol 35 :62-74. King, E. O., Ward M. K., Raney D. E. 1954. Two simple media for demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med 44:301-307. Kogel K-H., Franken P., Hü ckelhoven R. 2006. Endophyte or parasite – what decides? Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:358-363. Lane D. J., Stackebrandt E., Goodfellow M. 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics: 115-175. Li H., Wang Q., Wang R., Zhang Y., Wang X., Wang H. 2017. Global regulator SoxR is a negative regulator of efflux pump gene expression and affects antibiotic resistance and fitness in Acinetobacter baumannii. Medicine (Baltimore) 96 : e7188. Louws F.J., Wilson M., Campbell H.L., Cuppels D.A., Jones J.B., Shoemaker P.B., Sahin F., Miller S.A. 2001. Field control of bacterial spot and bacterial speck of tomato using a plant activator. Plant Dis 85: 481-488. Malinowski D.P., Alloush G.A., Belesky D.P. 2000. Leaf endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum modifies mineral uptake in tall fescue. Plant Soil 227: 115-126. Manzo D., Ferriello F., Puopolo G., Zoina A., D’Esposito D., Tardella L., Ferrarini A., Ercolano M. R. 2016. Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici induces distinct transcriptome reprogramming in resistant and susceptible isogenic tomato lines. BMC Plant Biol 16:53. Martínez L., Caballero M. J., Orozco J., Martínez R. E. 2003. Diazotrophic bacteria associated with banana (Musa spp.). Plant Soil 257: 35-47. McGuire R. G., Jones J. B., Sasser M. 1986. Tween media for semiselective isolation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria from soil and plant material. Plant Dis 70: 887-891. Mishra R. P., Singh R. K., Jaiswal H. K., Kumar V., Maurya S. 2006. Rhizobium mediated induction of phenolics and plant growth promotion in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Curr Microbiol 52: 383-389. Myresiotis C. K, Karaoglanidis G. S, Vryzas Z., Papadopoulou-Mourkidou E. 2011. Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria versus pathogenic infections: an example of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in tomato. Pest Manag Sci 68: 404–411. Nassar A. H., El-Tarabily K. A., Sivasithamparam K. 2005. Promotion of plant growth by an auxin-producing isolate of the yeast Williopsis saturnus endophytic in maize (Zea mays L.) roots. Biol Fertil Soils 42: 97-108. Nelson K., Weinel C., Paulsen I., Dodson R., Hilbert H., Martins dos Santos V., et al. 2002. Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of the metabolically versatile Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ Microbiol 4: 799-808. Parke J. L. and Gurian-Sherman D. 2001. Diversity of the Burkholderia cepacia complex and implications for risk assessment of biological control strains. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:225-258. Pastrana A. M., Basallote-Ureba M. J., Aguado A., AkdiK H., Capote N. 2016. Biological control of strawberry soil-borne pathogens Macrophomina phaseolina and Fusarium solani, using Trichoderma asperellum and Bacillus spp. Phytopathol Mediterr 55: 109-120. Perin L., Martinez-Aguilar L., Paredes-Valdez G., Baldani J. I., Estrada-de Los Santos P., Reis V. M., Caballero-Mellado J. 2006. Burkholderia silvatlantica sp. nov., a diazotrophic bacterium associated with sugar cane and maize. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1931-1937. Ramette A., LiPuma J. J., Tiedje J. M. 2005. Species abundance and diversity of Burkholderia cepacia complex in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1193-1201. Reis V. M., Estrada-de Los Santos P., Tenorio-Salgado S., Vogel J., Stoffels M., Guyon S., Mavingui P., Baldani V. L., Schmid M., Baldani J. I., Balandreau J., Hartmann A., Caballero-Mellado J. 2004. Burkholderia tropica sp. nov., a novel nitrogen-fixing, plant-associated bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54: 2155-2162. Riley M. A. and Wertz J. E. 2002. BACTERIOCINS: Evolution, ecology, and application. Annu Rev Microbiol 56:117–37. Rivard, C. L., O’Connell S., Peet M. M., Welker R. M., Louws F. J. 2012. Grafting tomato to manage bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum in the southeastern United States. Plant Dis 96:973-978. Rodriguez R. J., White Jr. J. F., Arnold A. E., Redman R. S. 2009. Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol 182: 314-30. Saikkonen K., Wali P., Helander M., Faeth S. H. 2004. Evolution of endophyte–plant symbioses. Trends Plant Sci 9: 1360-1385. Schulz B., Boyle C. 2005. The endophytic continuum. Mycolog Res 109: 661–86. Senthilkumar M., Govindasamy V., Annapurna K. 2007. Role of antibiosis in suppression of charcoal rot disease by soybean endophyte Paenibacillus sp. HKA-15. Curr Microbiol 55: 25-29. Shahzad R., Khan A. L., Bilal S., Asaf S., Lee I-J. 2017. Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria versus pathogenic infections: an example of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in tomato. PeerJ 5: e3107. Sullivan T. J., Rodstrom J., Vandop J., Librizzi J., Graham C., Schardl C. L., Bultman T. L. 2007. Symbiont mediated change in Lolium arundinaceum inducible defenses: evidence from changes in gene expression and leaf composition. New Phytol 176: 673-679. Tenorio-Salgado S., Tinoco R., Vazquez-Duhalt R., Caballero-Mellado J., Perez-Rueda E. 2013 Identification of volatile compounds produced by the bacterium Burkholderia tropica that inhibit the growth of fungal pathogens, Bioe 4: 236-243. Turner S., Pryer K. M., Miao V. P. W., Palmer J. D. 1999. Investigating deep phylogenetic relationships among cyanobacteria and plastids by small subunit rRNA sequence analysis. J Eukaryot Microbiol 46: 327–338. Upreti R., Thomas P. 2015. Root-associated bacterial endophytes from Ralstonia solanacearum resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars and their pathogen antagonistic effects. Front Microbiol 6: 255. Van V. T., Berge O., Ke S. N., Balandreau J., Heulin T. 2000. Repeated beneficial effects of rice inoculation with a strain of Burkholderia vietnamiensis on early and late yield components in low fertility sulphate acid soils of Vietnam. Plant Soil 218: 273-284. Vázquez-de-Aldana B. R., García-Ciudad A., García-Criado B., Vicente-Tavera S., Zabalgogeazcoa I. 2013. Fungal endophyte (Epichloë festucae) alters the nutrient content of Festuca rubra regardless of water availability. PLoS ONE 8: e84539. Vílchez J.I., García-Fontana C., Román-Naranjo D., González-López J., Manzanera M. 2016. Plant drought tolerance enhancement by trehalose production of desiccation-tolerant microorganisms. Front Microbiol 7:1577. Xie H., Pasternak J. J., Glick B. R. 1996. Isolation and characterization of mutants of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12–2 that overproduce indoleacetic acid. Curr Microbiol 32:67- 71. Xue C., Penton C. R., Shen Z., Zhang R., Huang Q., Li R., Ruan Y., Shen Q. 2015. Manipulating the banana rhizosphere microbiome for biological control of Panama disease. Sci Rep 5: 11124. Zhang H., Hanada S., Shigematsu T., Shibuya K., Kamagata Y., Kanagata T., Kurame R. 2000. Burkholderia kururiensis sp.nov., a trichloroethylene (TCE)-degrading bacterium isolated from an aquifer polluted with TCE. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:743–749 Zhao L. F., Xu Y. J., Ma Z. Q., Deng Z. S., Shan C. J., Wei G. H. 2013. Colonization and plant growth promoting characterization of endophytic Pseudomonas chlororaphis strain Zong1 isolated from Sophora alopecuroides root nodules. Braz J Microbiol 44: 623-631. Zylstra G. J. and Gibson D. T. 1989. Toluene degradation by Pseudomonas putida F1. J Biol Chem 264: 14940-14946. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20431 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 番茄 (Solanum lycopersicum) 為全球溫帶地區種植面積廣大之重要經濟作物,於台灣栽培面積約 5,000 公頃,主要集中於中南部,年產量可達 12 萬公噸。番茄栽培時常遭遇許多病害的襲擊,尤以青枯病和萎凋病最為嚴重。目前有許多方式可用來進行番茄病害之管理,例如:輪作、土壤消毒、使用抗病品種或嫁接苗和施用藥劑等,但研發較安全及對生態友善的防治策略以納入番茄之綜合防治中仍有其必要性。憑藉著內生菌與植物間具緊密交互作用之利,施用具有增強植物抗性及促進植物生長能力的植物內生菌,將是促進番茄產業發展的新契機。因此,本研究藉由誘釣或直接分離法取得具潛力之番茄內生細菌,目前共分得 128 株內生細菌,接著利用培養基測試其促進植物生長相關能力,包括溶磷、螯鐵分子及生長素的合成,亦對其拮抗病原能力及是否能提高抗病能力進行測試。篩選出促進生長效果較佳之 7 株菌株 XK1-13、XP1-3、XP1-8、XP2-2、XR2-3、MK2-1 及 A7,其中以 XP1-8 及 A7 效果最為顯著,與對照組比較分別可增加番茄幼苗 30.89% 及 46.57% 之總乾重。本研究亦測試內生菌與番茄幼苗之共生位置及最佳共生條件,結果顯示內生菌共生之位置多位於植株之下胚軸,而對根長 0.2~2 公分之幼苗處理 1x108 cfu/mL 的 XP1-8 和 A7 兩菌株48 小時之共生效果最佳。此外,對峙培養試驗中,XK1-13、XP1-3 及 A7 能有效抑制番茄青枯病菌 (Ralstonia solanacearum Pss97) 之生長,於接種實驗中可見 XP1-3、XP2-2、XR2-3 及 MK2-1 具有延後番茄青枯病病程發展之效果,另外,XP2-2、MK2-1 兩菌株可降低番茄感染細菌性斑點病後之植株內菌量。最後,經由 16S rDNA 的序列分析鑑定, A7 及 XP1-8 兩菌株分別為Pseudomonas putida 及 Burkholderia tropica。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is an important cash crop widely grown in temperate climates across the world. In Taiwan, approximately 5,000 ha, mainly in the middle and south parts of Taiwan, were used for tomato production, and the annual yield is about 120 thousand tons. During cultivation, tomato plants may encounter attack of different pathogens such as Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici. Although common strategies, such as crop rotation, soil sterilization, use of resistant cultivars or grafted seedlings and application of pesticides, are available for tomato disease management, much safer and eco-friendly means are worth of development. To take advantage of the intimate interaction with plants, application of endophytes with ability to enhance tomato resistance and plant growth should shed light on improvement of tomato production. In this study, endophytic bacteria were isolated from tomato plants by luring or direct isolation, which were then used to perform assays for investigation of the plant growth-promoting activities, including phosphate solubilization, siderophore production and IAA biosynthesis. In order to understand their potentials to enhance tomato tolerance to various biotic stress, antagonistic effects against different tomato pathogens in vitro as well as pathogenicity assays was performed. One hundred and twenty-eight potential endophytic bacteria strains were isolated and tomato plants treated with 7 isolates, including XK1-13, XP1-3, XP1-8, XP2-2, XR2-3, MK2-1 and A7, showed increased biomass compared to control plants. Among these 7 isolates,
the effect of XP1-8 and A7 on plant growth was more significant. They showed 30.89% and 46.57% increase in dry weight compared to control, respectively. On the other hand, the colonization sites and the colonization rates were assessed. The results showed that the endophytes mostly colonized in the hypocotyl of tomato.The highest colonization rate were detected when the tomato seedlings, whose root length is between 0.2 to 2 cm, wereco-cultured with these endophytes at the level of 1x108 CFU/mL for 48 hours. In an antagonistic activity assay, XK1-13, XP1-3 and A7 exhibited inhibitory activity on growth of Ralstonia solanacearum Pss97. In a pathogenicity assay, XP1-3, XP2-2, XR2-3 and MK2-1 caused delayed symptom development of bacterial wilt. In addition, XP2-2 and MK2-1 reduced the bacteria number of Xanthomonas perforans XTN169 in tomato leaves. At the end, A7 and XP1-8 was identified as Pseudomonas putida and Burkholderia tropica, respectively, by analysis of their 16S rDNA sequences. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T02:48:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04645003-1.pdf: 3057542 bytes, checksum: 1fb0ef1147acbd27e1bf1929988e7cd2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………..………. i
誌謝…………………………………………………………………....... ii 中文摘要………………………………………………………….……. iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………….. iv 壹、前言………………………………………………………… 1 貳、材料與方法…………………………………………………… 10 1. 供試植物與栽培條件…………………………………………………….. 10 2. 供試菌株培養條件與保存………………………………………………... 10 3. 內生菌之分離……………………………………………………………... 10 4. 內生細菌之篩選………………………………………………………….. 11 5. 內生細菌之共生特性…………………………………………………….. 12 6. 內生菌對番茄生長之影響……………………………………………….. 13 7. 內生細菌對生物性逆境之影響………………………………………….. 14 8. 內生細菌菌種之鑑定…………………………………………………..… 15 參、結果………………………………………………………….. 18 1. 內生菌之分離與篩選…………………………………………………….. 18 2. 內生菌之共生特性……………………………………………………….. 19 3. 內生細菌對番茄生長之影響…………………………………………….. 22 4. 接種內生細菌對番茄抗生物性逆境之影響…………………………….. 22 5. 內生細菌菌種之鑑定…………………………………………………….. 23 肆、討論………………………………………………………….. 24 參考文獻………………………………………………………….…… 29 附錄………………………………………………………….………… 62 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 施用內生細菌增加番茄生長及抗生物性逆境之探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Studies on the application of the endophytic bacteria to enhance tomato growth and tolerance to biotic stress | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳文哲,洪挺軒,鍾嘉綾 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 番茄,內生菌,促進植物生長,誘導抗病, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Tomato,endophytes,plant growth promotion,induced resistance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 63 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201703814 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 植物醫學碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 植物醫學碩士學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.99 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。