Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學組
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20272
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳忠仁
dc.contributor.authorWan-Te Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃萬得zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T02:43:48Z-
dc.date.copyright2018-03-01
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-01-24
dc.identifier.citation伍忠賢,2013,企業併購-理論與實務 (第四版),台北:新陸書局
林建甫,2016,企業併購的第一堂課 (初版),台北:中華經濟與金融協會
尚榮安,2001,個案研究法 (初版),台北:弘智文化
紐文英、吳裕益,2015,單一個案研究法-研究設計與後設分析 (初版),台北:心理出版社
湯明哲,2002,購併後的整合策略,遠見雜誌 2002年1月號
魏明,2005,基於交易成本理論的企業縱向併購動因分析,經濟師2005年第4期
Ai, Q.(2014), Key Success Factors in the Management of Post-acquisition Integration in the Outward Mergers and Acquisitions of Chinese Firms, PhD Thesis, Royal Holloway University of London
Alwis, Asha Prasangi, (2013) Post Merger Integration Leader and Acquisition Success: A Theoretical Model of Perceived Linkages to Success of Mergers and Acquisitions',. Education Doctoral Dissertations in Organization Development. : 19.
Angwin, Duncan N.,Mellahi,K, Gomes, E, Peter, E (2016) How communication approaches impact mergers and acquisitions outcomes, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(20):2370-2397
Birkinshaw J, Bresman H and Hakanson, L (2000) Managing the Post-acquisition Integration Process: How the Human Iintegration and Task Integration Processes Interact to Foster Value Creation: Journal of Management Studies, 37(3) :395-425
Bragado, Julio F. (1992), Setting the correct speed for postmerger integration, M&A Europe, 4(4) :24-31
Buono, Anthony F. and James L. Bowditch(1989), The Human Side of Mergers and Acquisition. San Francisco, Ca:Jossey-Bass
CLASH OF THE TITANS (2014) An Independent Comparison of SAP, Oracle and Microsoft Dynamics : Panorama Consulting Solutions
Deal, Terrence E. and Kennedy, Allan A. (1982) Corporate Culture:The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
Galpin, Timothy J. and D.E. Robinson, (1997) Merger Integration: The Ultimate Change Management Challenge”, M&A. :24-28
Graebner, Melissa E.(2004), Momentum and Serendipity: How Acquired Leaders Create Value In The Integration of Technology Firms, Strategy Management Journal Special Issue: The Global Acquisition, Leverage and Protection of Technological Competencies, 25(8): 751-777
Harrison, Jeffrey S., Michael A. Hitt, Robert E. Hoskisson and R. Duane Ireland (2001), Resource Complementarity In Business Combinations: Extending The Logic to Organization Alliances, Journal of Management, 27(6):679-690
Haleblian, Jerayr, Cynthia E. Devers, Gerry Mcnamara, Mason A. Carpenter and Robert B. Davison (2009), Taking Stock of What We Know About Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review and Research Agenda, Journal of Management, 35(3): 469-502
Haspeslagh, P. and Jemison, D.(1991), Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value through Corporate Renewal. New York: Free Press
Homburg C, Bucerius M. (2006),“ Is speed of integration really a success factor of merger and acquisitions? Ananalysis of the role of internal and external relatedness”, Strategic Management Journal, 27,: 347-367
https://strategyzer.com/canvas , by Alex Osterwalder
Kelly,J.,C. Cook and D. Spitzer(1999), Mergers and Acquisitions: Global Research Report, KPMG: 1-21
Kidder,L. & Judd, C.M.(1986), Research methods in social relations(5th ed). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
Kimberly,E., & Lamont, B.(2004), “Ideal” acquisition integration approaches in related acquisitions of equals: a test of long-held beliefs, Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions,3, 81-102
King, D. R., Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., & Covin, J. G. (2004). Meta‐analyses of post‐acquisition performance: Indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 187-200.
Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of international business studies, 19(3),411-432.
Liu, J & Chen, X (2015), Balancing Integration and Autonomy in the Post-acquisition Phase – A study of German firms acquired by Chinese firms, Master’s Thesis, Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University
Lubskin, Michael (1983), Mergers and the Performance of the Acquiring Firm, Academy Manage Review, 8(2): 218-225
Pablo, Amy L.,(1994), Determinants of Acquisition Integration Level: A Decision-Making Perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 37(4) : 803-836
Pitkethly, R., Faulkner, D. & Child, J.,(2003), Integrating Acquisitions. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 2, 27-57
Schmidt, J.A.(2002), Business Perspective on Mergers and Acquisitions, In Schmidt,J.A. Making Mergers Work, Alexandria, Va:Society for Human Resource Management: 23-46
Schoenberg, R. (2006). Measuring the Performance of Corporate Acquisitions: An Empirical Comparison of Alternative Metrics. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 361-370.
Yin, R.K., Bateman, P.G. and Moore, G.B. (1983) Case Studies and Organizational Innovation: Strengthening the Connection. COSMOS Corporation, Washington DC.
Yin, R.K., (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Inc.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20272-
dc.description.abstract併購是企業尋求外部成長時最常使用的策略,透過併購可取得技術、品牌與通路等資源使企業快速成長,且可以藉由更具效率的資源使用及綜效的產生増強競爭優勢。統計指出,快速成長且高獲利的企業有半數以上是以併購為主要手段。
然而,併購也是失敗率極高的企業活動,有七到九成的案例以失敗收場。併購後企業績效能超過資金成本的只有四分之一左右。導致併購失敗的原因很多,包含目標選定錯誤、盡職調查不確實、購買談判居下風、綜效未能實現等。即便事前準備充分且順利簽約,若沒做好併購後的整合工作,併購案還是會以失敗收場。
唯有成功的企業整合,才能夠實現原先設定的併購綜效。因此,如何提高整合成功率以達成併購目標,值得深入探討。透過相關文獻歸納整理及個案分析驗證,我們列出影響併購後整合的數個重要因素,並探討這些因素如何影響整合成果。
本研究採用的個案為歷經三年的併購後整合專案,是一家台灣企業對美國企業的跨國併購,同時也是產業上下游間的垂直併購。藉由個案實證,我們發現主併方須審慎評估應賦予被併方多大的自主性。此外,針對不同事項的整合速度必須不同,例如垂直併購的後台整合須快速,跨國併購的文化整合則不能強求。企業整合的重心是員工,如果員工人心不穩、謠言滿天,則組織遲早會潰散。本研究還探討了如何規劃併購後最關鍵的一百天、如何決定領導人、組織內溝通、及文化距離等議題。由個案中可看出「人的因素」與併購後整合的成敗關聯最大,必須謹慎處理。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractMergers and acquisitions (M&As) have really taken off over the last couple of years with firms attempting to grow externally rather than internally. The growth comes from pursuing complementarity between companies from resources such as technology, brand and channel. Competitive advantages can be enhanced by efficient resource usage and synergy creation. It is also known that half of the fast growing & profitable companies use M&A as their major growth strategy.
According to collated researches, however, the failure rate for M&A sits between 70 percent and 90 percent. Only around a quarter of deals boost shareholder returns. The causes of such a high failure rate include: wrong target, inadequate due diligence (DD), poor negotiation skill or negative synergy. Moreover, even we have perfect DD and right price, the deal still fails if the post M&A integration fails.
Synergy target can only be achieved by successful integration. How to increase the success rate of post M&A integration is our major concern. We focus our efforts on elaborating the factors that affect integration results via literature review and case study.
The case we used is a 3-year integration project on a cross-border / vertical M&A. Acquiring side is a Taiwanese company H who acquires a Chicago-based American firm in 2014. Through the empirical study we found that autonomy is the most important factor that must be handled carefully. Pace of integration may vary with different subjects, such as that we need fast integration in back office operations but we must respect and be patient on culture distance. We found that human resource management is crucial to the success of newly-integrated organization. We also investigated the topics such as the first 100 days after M&A, importance of the leader, communications and the subject of common goal. From this case we found that “ Human Factor “ plays the most important role in post M&A integration.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T02:43:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-P04748023-1.pdf: 798698 bytes, checksum: 515e9833e9aafe92c369e8e508effe47 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
中文摘要 iii
THESIS ABSTRACT iv
目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 2
第三節 研究流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 併購 5
第二節 併購後整合 11
第三節 整合的關鍵因素 16
第三章 研究方法 21
第一節 質性研究 21
第二節 個案研究法 22
第三節 研究限制 26
第四章 個案分析 27
第一節 個案背景 27
第二節 整合過程 38
第三節 整合成果 41
第四節 個案發現 45
第五章 結論與建議 52
第一節 研究結論 52
第二節 研究建議 54
參考文獻 55
圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程圖 4
圖2-1 人員工作整合程序對併購結果的影響 13
圖2-2 整合程度的分類 15
圖2-3 企業文化模型 18
圖4-1 博弈機台的關鍵零組件 27
圖4-2 商業模式畫布 33
圖4-3 產品線互補 40

表目錄
表2-1 併購對價項目差異 6
表2-2 併購行為的理論與效應 8
表2-3 個別營運因素的速度指標 19
表2-4 整合步驟與速度 20
表3-1 不同研究策略的相關狀況 22
表3-2 個案研究的基本設計類型 23
表3-3 六種證據來源及優缺點 24
表4-1 H公司的經營特色 28
表4-2 W公司營業項目 29
表4-3 W公司財務表現 29
表4-4 W公司經營特色 30
表4-5 W公司的困境 30
表4-6 併購案優缺點評估 31
表4-7 併購時間線 33
表4-8 面臨的挑戰 35
表4-9 雙方分工 42
表4-10 W公司財務表現 43
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title企業跨國垂直併購後整合之研究:以H公司為例zh_TW
dc.titleOn Cross-border Post Vertical M&A Integration :
A Case Study of Company H
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee余峻瑜,郭佳瑋
dc.subject.keyword併購,併購後整合,盡職調查,綜效,自主性,文化距離,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordMergers & Acquisitions,Post M&A Integration,Due Diligence,Synergy,Autonomy,Cultural Distance,en
dc.relation.page57
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201800149
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2018-01-24
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學組zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:商學組

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
779.98 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved