請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20177
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李伯訓(Bor-Shiunn Lee),楊宗傑(Tsung-Chieh Yang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Bo-Han Zeng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 曾柏翰 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T02:41:33Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-23 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-10-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1)Davidson, C. L; Feilzer, A. J., Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. Journal of Dentistry 1997; 25: 435-40. 2)Mair, L. H., Wear in dentistry--current terminology. Journal of Dentistry 1992; 20: 140-4. 3)Srivastava, R; Liu, J; He, C; Sun, Y., BisGMA analogues as monomers and diluents for dental restorative composite materials. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2018; 88: 25-31. 4)Atai, M.; Watts D. C.; Atai, Z., Shrinkage strain-rates of dental resin-monomer and composite systems. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 5015-20. 5)Bowen, R. L.; Washington, D. C., Dental filling material comprising vinyl silane treated fused silica and a binder consisting of the reaction product of bis phenol and glycidyl acrylate. United States Patent Office 1959. 6)Bowen, R. L.; Washington, D. C., Silica-resin direct filling material and method of preparation. United States Patent Office 1962. 7)Bowen, R. L. Use of epoxy resins in restorative materials. Journal of Dentistry 1956; 35: 360-9. 8)Vasudeva G., Monomer systems for dental composites and their future: a review. Journal of the California Dental Association 2009; 37: 389-98. 9)Perez-Mondragon, A. A.; Cuevas-Suarez, C. E.; Suarez Castillo, O.R.; Gonzalez-Lopez, J. A.; Herrera-Gonzalez, A. M., Evaluation of biocompatible monomers as substitutes for TEGDMA in resin-based dental composites. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2018; 93: 80-7. 10)Velo, M.; Wang, L.; Furuse, A. Y.; Brianezzi, L. F. F.; Scotti, C. K.; Zabeu, G. S., Influence of Modulated Photo-Activation on Shrinkage Stress and Degree of Conversion of Bulk-Fill Composites. Brazilian Dental Journal 2019; 30: 592-8. 11)Al Sunbul, H.; Silikas, N.; Watts, D. C., Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and shrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites. Dental Materials 2016; 32: 998-1006. 12)Davidson, C. L.; Feilzer, A. J., Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. Journal of Dentistry 1997; 25: 435-40. 13)Rees, J. S.; Jacobsen, P. H., The polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. Dental Materials 1989; 5: 41-4. 14)Soares, C. J.; Faria-E-Silva, A. L.; Rodrigues, M, P.; Vilela, A. B. F.; Pfeifer, C. S. Tantbirojn, D.; Versluis, A., Polymerization shrinkage stress of composite resins and resin cements - What do we need to know? Brazilian Oral Research 2017; 31: e62. 15)Guimaraes, G. F.; Marcelino, E.; Cesarino, I.; Vicente, F. B.; Grandini, C. R.; Simoes, R. P., Minimization of polymerization shrinkage effects on composite resins by the control of irradiance during the photoactivation process. Journal of Applied Oral Science 2018; 26: e20170528. 16)Xue, J.; Yang, B. N.; Effect of preheating on the properties of resin composite. Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi 2019; 37: 571-6. 17)Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Xiong, G.; Zhang, J.; Guo, R.; Li. L. et al. A low-shrinkage dental composite with epoxy-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2020; 103: 103515. 18)Akay, C.; Tanis, M. C.; Gulverdiyeva, M., Coloration of provisional restoration materials: a comparison of the effects of mouth rinses and green tea. European Oral Research 2018; 52: 20-6. 19)Jalali, H.; Dorrizm, H.; Hoseinkhezri, F.; Emadian Razavi, S. F., In vitro color stability of provisional restorative materials. Indian Journal of Dental Research 2012; 23: 388-92. 20)Um, C.M.; Ruyter, I. E., Staining of resin-based veneering materials with coffee and tea. Quintessence International 1991; 22: 377-86. 21)Watanabe, H.; Kim, E.; Piskorski, N. L.; Sarsland, J.; Covey, D. A,; Johnson, W.W., Mechanical properties and color stability of provisional restoration resins. American Journal of Dentistry 2013; 26: 265-70. 22)Givens, E. J.; Neiva, G.; Yaman, P.; Dennison, J. B., Marginal adaptation and color stability of four provisional materials. Journal of Prosthodontics 2007; 17: 97-101. 23)Kruzic, J. J.; Arsecularatne, J. A.; Tanaka, C. B.; Hoffman, MJ, Cesar, P. F., Recent advances in understanding the fatigue and wear behavior of dental composites and ceramics. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2018; 88: 504-33. 24)Hansel, C.; Leyhausen, G.; Mai, U. E.; Geurtsen, W., Effects of various resin composite (co)monomers and extracts on two caries-associated micro-organisms in vitro. Journal of Dental Research 1998; 77: 60-7. 25)Eick, J. D.; Byerley, T. J.; Chappell, R. P.; Chen, G. R.; Bowles, C. Q.; Chappelow, C. C., Properties of expanding SOC/epoxy copolymers for dental use in dental composites. Dental Materials 1993; 9: 123-7. 26)Stansbury, J. W., Synthesis and evaluation of novel multifunctional oligomers for dentistry. Journal of Dental Research 1992; 71: 434-7. 27)Stansbury, J. W.; Dickens, B.; Liu, D. W., Preparation and characterization of cyclopolymerizable resin formulations. Journal of Dental Research 1995; 74: 1110-5. 28)Srivastava, R.; Liu, J.; He, C.; Sun, Y., BisGMA analogues as monomers and diluents for dental restorative composite materials. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2018; 88: 25-31. 29)Dewaele, M.; Truffier-Boutry, D.; Devaux, J.; Leloup, G., Volume contraction in photocured dental resins: the shrinkage-conversion relationship revisited. Dental Materials 2006; 22: 359-65. 30)Soderholm, K. J.; Mariotti, A., Bis-GMA--based resins in dentistry: are they safe? Journal of the American Dental Association 1999; 130: 201-9. 31)Stansbury, J. W.; Trujillo-Lemon, M.; Lu, H.; Ding, X.; Lin, Y.; Ge, J., Conversion-dependent shrinkage stress and strain in dental resins and composites. Dental Materials 2005; 21: 56-67. 32)Goncalves, F.; Kawano, Y.; Pfeifer. C.; Stansbury, J. W.; Braga, R. R., Influence of BisGMA, TEGDMA, and BisEMA contents on viscosity, conversion, and flexural strength of experimental resins and composites. European Journal of Oral Sciences 2009; 117: 442-6. 33)詹益典. 以二異氰酸鹽和甲基丙烯酸-2-羥基乙酯做為側鏈的牙科用壓克力樹脂的性質探討. 台北市: 國立臺灣大學; 2012. 34)Moszner, N.; Fischer, U. K.; Angermann, J.; Rheinberger, V., A partially aromatic urethane dimethacrylate as a new substitute for Bis-GMA in restorative composites. Dental Materials 2008; 24: 694-9. 35)Zhang, M.; Puska, M.A.; Botelho, M. G.; Säilynoja, E. S.; Matinlinna, J. P., Degree of conversion and leached monomers of urethane dimethacrylate-hydroxypropyl methacrylate-based dental resin systems. Journal of Oral Science 2016; 58: 15-22. 36)Martim, G. C.; Pfeifer, C. S.; Girotto, E. M., Novel urethane-based polymer for dental applications with decreased monomer leaching. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2017; 72: 192-201. 37)Becher, R.; Wellendorf, H. Sakhi, A. K.; Samuelsen, J. T.; Thomsen, C.; Bølling, A. K.; et al., Presence and leaching of bisphenol a (BPA) from dental materials. Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica 2018; 4: 56-62. 38)Kingman, A.; Hyman, J.; Masten, S. A.; Jayaram, B.; Smith, C.; Eichmiller, F.; et al. Bisphenol A and other compounds in human saliva and urine associated with the placement of composite restorations. Journal of the American Dental Association 2012; 143: 1292-302. 39)Marzouk, T.; Sathyanarayana, S.; Kim, A. S.; Seminario, A. L.; McKinney, C. M., A systematic review of exposure to bisphenol a from dental treatment. Journal of Dental Research Clinical and Translational Research 2019; 4: 106-15. 40)Maserejian, N. N.; Trachtenberg, F. L.; Wheaton, O. B.; Calafat, A. M.; Ranganathan, G.; Kim, H. Y.; et al., Changes in urinary bisphenol A concentrations associated with placement of dental composite restorations in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Dental Association 2016; 147: 620-30. 41)Kanerva, L.; Jolanki, R.; Estlander, T., 10 years of patch testing with the (meth)acrylate series. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 37: 255-8. 42)Pérez-Mondragón, A. A.; Cuevas-Suárez, C. E.; Suárez Castillo, O. R.; González-López, J. A.; Herrera-González, A. M., Evaluation of biocompatible monomers as substitutes for TEGDMA in resin-based dental composites. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2018; 93: 80-7. 43)Borges, M. G.; Barcelos, L. M.; Menezes, M. S.; Soares, C. J.; Fugolin, A. P. P.; Navarro, O.; et al., Effect of the addition of thiourethane oligomers on the sol-gel composition of BisGMA/TEGDMA polymer networks. Dental Materials 2019; 35: 1523-31. 44)Geurtsen, W.; Leyhausen, G., Chemical-biological interactions of the resin monomer triethyleneglycol-dimethacrylate (TEGDMA). Journal of Dental Research 2001; 80: 2046-50. 45)Ferracane, J. L., Current trends in dental composites. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology Medicine 1995; 6: 302-18. 46)Astudillo-Rubio, D.; Delgado-Gaete, A.; Bellot-Arcís, C.; Montiel-Company, J. M.; Pascual-Moscardó, A.; Almerich-Silla, J. M., Mechanical properties of provisional dental materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 2018; 13: e0193162. 47)Barghi, N.; Simmons, E. W., The marginal integrity of the temporary acrylic resin crown. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1976; 36: 274-7. 48)Kwon, T. Y.; Ha, J. Y.; Chun, J. N.; Son, J. S.; Kim, K. H.; Effects of prepolymerized particle size and polymerization kinetics on volumetric shrinkage of dental modeling resins. Biomed Research International 2014; 2014: 914739. 49)Jo, L. J.; Shenoy, K. K.; Shetty, S., Flexural strength and hardness of resins for interim fixed partial dentures. Indian Journal of Dental Research 2011; 22: 71-6. 50)Haselton, D. R.; Diaz-Arnold, A. M.; Vargas, M. A., Flexural strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2002; 87: 225-8. 51)Khatri, C. A.; Stansbury, J. W.; Schultheisz, C. R.; Antonucci, J. M., Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of urethane derivatives of Bis-GMA. Dental Materials 2003; 19: 584-8. 52)Singh, A.; Garg, S., Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of provisional crown and bridge materials-an invitro study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2016; 10: Zc72-7. 53)Wang, R. L.; Moore, B. K.; Goodacre, C. J.; Swartz, M. L.; Andres, C. J., A comparison of resins for fabricating provisional fixed restorations.The International Journal of Prosthodont 1989; 2: 173-84. 54)Lee, J.; Lee, S., Evaluation of add-on methods for bis-acryl composite resin interim restorations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2015; 114: 594-601. 55)Wang, R. L.; Moore, B. K.; Goodacre, C. J.; Swartz, M. L.; Andres, C. J., A comparison of resins for fabricating provisional fixed restorations. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 1989; 2.:173-84 56)Flory, P. J., Molecular size distribution in three dimensional polymers. VI. Branched polymers containing A—R—Bf-1 type units. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1952; 74: 2718-23. 57)Jeon, I. Y.; Noh, H. J.; Baek, J. B., Hyperbranched macromolecules: from synthesis to applications. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: Molecules 2018; 23. 58)Chattopadhyay, D. K.; Raju, K., Structural engineering of polyurethane coatings for high performance applications. Journal of Progress in Polymer Science 2007; 32: 352-418. 59)Khil, M. S.; Cha, D. I.; Kim, H. Y.; Kim, I. S.; Bhattarai, N., Electrospun nanofibrous polyurethane membrane as wound dressing. Journal of Biomedical Material Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 2003; 67: 675-9. 60)Habib, E.; Wang, R.; Zhu, X. X., Monodisperse silica-filled composite restoratives mechanical and light transmission properties. Dental Materials 2017; 33: 280-7. 61)Satterthwaite, J. D.; Vogel, K.; Watts, D. C., Effect of resin-composite filler particle size and shape on shrinkage-strain. Dental Materials 2009; 25: 1612-5. 62)Satterthwaite, J. D.; Maisuria, A.; Vogel, K. Watts, D. C., Effect of resin-composite filler particle size and shape on shrinkage-stress. Dental Materials 2012; 28: 609-14. 63)Kruzic, J. J.; Arsecularatne, J. A.; Tanaka, C. B.; Hoffman, M. J.; Cesar, P. F., Recent advances in understanding the fatigue and wear behavior of dental composites and ceramics. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2018; 88: 504-33. 64)Adabo, G. L., The volumetric fraction of inorganic particles and the flexural strength of composites for posterior teeth. Journal of Dentistry 2003; 31: 353-9. 65)Manhart, J.; Kunzelmann, K. H.; Chen, H. Y.; Hickel, R., Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dental Materials 2000; 16: 33-40. 66)Wang, X.; Cai, Q.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Y.; Xu, M.; Yang, X.; et al. Improved performance of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental composites by net-like structures formed from SiO2 nanofiber fillers. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2016; 59: 464-70. 67)Van Landuyt, K. L.; Snauwaert, J.; De, M. J.; Peumans, M.; Yoshida, Y.; Poitevin, A.; et al., Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3757-85. 68)Liu, Y.; Bai, X.; Liu, Y. W.; Wang, Y., Light-cured self-etch adhesives undergo hydroxyapatite-triggered self-cure. Journal of Dental Research 2016; 95: 334-41. 69)Ibrahim, A.; Maurin, V.; Ley, C.; Allonas, X.; Croutxe-Barghorn, C.; Jasinski, F., Investigation of termination reactions in free radical photopolymerization of UV powder formulations. European Polymer Journal 2012; 48: 1475-84. 70)Odian, G., Principles of Polymerization: Fourth Edition 2004. 71)許載欣. 不同聚合條件對自聚式聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯樹脂之影響. 台北市: 國立陽明大學; 2001. 72)Ferracane, J. L., Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dental Materials 1985; 1: 11-4. 73)Rueggeberg, F. A.; Craig, R. G., Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. Journal of Dental Research 1988; 67: 932-7. 74)Yu, P.; Yap, A.; Wang, X. Y., Degree of conversion and polymerization shrinkage of bulk-fill resin-based composites. Operative Dentistry 2017; 42: 82-9. 75)Salem, H. N.; Hefnawy, S. M.; Nagi, S. M., Degree of conversion and polymerization shrinkage of low shrinkage bulk-fill resin composites. Contemp Clinical Dentistry 2019; 10: 465-70. 76)Schneider, L. F.; Pfeifer, C. S.; Consani, S.; Prahl, S. A.; Ferracane, J. L., Influence of photoinitiator type on the rate of polymerization, degree of conversion, hardness and yellowing of dental resin composites. Dental Materials 2008; 24: 1169-77. 77)Cotti, E.; Scungio, P.; Dettori, C.; Ennas, G., Comparison of the degree of conversion of resin based endodontic sealers using the DSC technique. European Journal of Dentistry 2011; 5: 131-8. 78)Tilbrook, D. A.; Clarke, R. L.; Howle, N. E.; Braden, M., Photocurable epoxy-polyol matrices for use in dental composites I. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1743-53. 79)Rosatto, C. M.; Bicalho, A. A.; Veríssimo, C.; Braganca, G. F.; Rodrigues, M. P.; Tantbirojn, D.; et al., Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique. Journal of Dentistry 2015; 43: 1519-28. 80)Huang, W.; Huan, S.; He, J.; Jiang, J., Design and development of a novel strain gauge automatic pasting device for mini split Hopkinson pressure bar.The Review of Scientific Instruments 2018; 89: 035115. 81)Skrtic, D.; Stansbury, J. W.; Antonucci, J. M., Volumetric contraction and methacrylate conversion in photo-polymerized amorphous calcium phosphate/methacrylate composites. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 2443-9. 82)Rees, J. S.; Jacobsen, P. H., The polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. Dental Materials 1989; 5: 41-4. 83)De Melo Monteiro, G. Q.; Montes, M. A.; Rolim, T. V.; De Oliveira Mota, C. C.; De Barros Correia Kyotoku, B.; Gomes, A. S.; et al., Alternative methods for determining shrinkage in restorative resin composites. Dental Materials 2011; 27: e176-85. 84)Pick, B.; Pelka, M.; Belli, R.; Braga, R. R.; Lohbauer, U., Tailoring of physical properties in highly filled experimental nanohybrid resin composites. Dental Materials 2011; 27: 664-9. 85)Rüttermann, S.; Krüger, S.; Raab, W. H.; Janda, R., Polymerization shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of contemporary posterior resin-based filling materials - a comparative study. Journal of Dentistry 2007; 35: 806-13. 86)ASTM-2240. Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—Durometer Hardness. 87)ISO-4049. Dentistry — Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. 88)Liu, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, C.; Bu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Na, H.; Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of a fluorinated resin monomer with low water sorption. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2018; 77: 446-54. 89)ISO-17304. Dentistry — Polymerization shrinkage: Method for determination of polymerization shrinkage of polymer-based restorative materials. 90)Pratap, B.; Gupta, R. K.; Bhardwaj, B.; Nag, M., Resin based restorative dental materials: characteristics and future perspectives. Japanese Dental Science Review 2019; 55: 126-38. 91)Elliott, J. E.; Lovell, L. G.; Bowman, C. N., Primary cyclization in the polymerization of bis-GMA and TEGDMA: a modeling approach to understanding the cure of dental resins. Dental Materials 2001; 17: 221-9. 92)Elliott, J. E.; Lovell, L.; Bowman, C., Primary cyclization in the polymerization of bis-GMA and TEGDMA: a modeling approach to understanding the cure of dental resins. Dental Materials 2001; 17: 221-9. 93)Vaidyanathan, J.; Vaidyanathan, T., Interactive effects of resin composition and ambient temperature of light curing on the percentage conversion, molar heat of cure and hardness of dental composite resins. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 1992; 3: 19-27. 94)Rochester, J. R., Bisphenol A and human health: a review of the literature. Reproductive Toxicology 2013; 42: 132-55. 95)Fujimori, Y.; Kaneko, T.; Kaku, T.; Yoshioka, N.; Nishide, H.; Tsuchida, E., Polymerization and photoinitiation behavior in the light‐cured dental composite resins. Polymers for Advanced Technologies 1992; 3: 437-41. 96)Musanje, L.; Ferracane, J. L.; Sakaguchi, R. L., Determination of the optimal photoinitiator concentration in dental composites based on essential material properties. Dental Materials 2009; 25: 994-1000. 97)Schneider, L. F.; Cavalcante, L. M.; Consani, S.; Ferracane, J. L., Effect of co-initiator ratio on the polymer properties of experimental resin composites formulated with camphorquinone and phenyl-propanedione. Dental Materials 2009; 25: 369-75. 98)Alshabib, A.; Silikas, N.; Watts, D. C., Hardness and fracture toughness of resin-composite materials with and without fibers. Dental Materials 2019; 35: 1194-203. 99)Gonçalves, F. P.; Alves, G, Guimarães, V. O. J.; Gallito, M. A.; Oliveira, F.; Scelza, M. Z., Cytotoxicity evaluation of two bisacryl composite resins using human gingival fibroblasts. Brazilian Dental Journal 2016; 27: 492-6. 100)Barszczewska-Rybarek, I.; Jurczyk, S., Comparative study of structure property relationships in polymer networks based on Bis-GMA, TEGDMA and various urethane-dimethacrylates. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: Materials (Basel) 2015; 8: 1230-48. 101)Goncalves, F.; Kawano, Y.; Pfeifer, C.; Stansbury, J. W.; Braga, R. R., Influence of BisGMA, TEGDMA, and BisEMA contents on viscosity, conversion, and flexural strength of experimental resins and composites. European Journal of Oral Sciences 2009; 117: 442-6. 102)Shibasaki, S.; Takamizawa, T.; Suzuki, T.; Nojiri, K.; Tsujimoto, A.; Barkmeier, W. W.; et al., Influence of different curing modes on polymerization behavior and mechanical properties of dual-cured provisional resins. Operative Dentistry 2017; 42: 526-36. 103)Bousses, Y.; Brulat-Bouchard, N.; Bouchard, PO.; Abouelleil, H.; Tillier, Y., Theoretical prediction of dental composites yield stress and flexural modulus based on filler volume ratio. Dental Materials 2020; 36: 97-107. 104)ISO-10477 I. Dentistry — Polymer-based crown and bridge materials. 105)Young-Kim, R. J.; Kim, Y. J.; Choi, N. S.; Lee, I, B., Polymerization shrinkage, modulus, and shrinkage stress related to tooth-restoration interfacial debonding in bulk-fill composites. Journal of Dentistry 2015; 43: 430-9. 106)Kim, S. H.; Watts, D. C., Polymerization shrinkage-strain kinetics of temporary crown and bridge materials. Dental Materials 2004; 20: 88-95. 107)Sideridou, I. D.; Karabela, M. M.; Vouvoudi, E., Volumetric dimensional changes of dental light-cured dimethacrylate resins after sorption of water or ethanol. Dental Materials 2008; 24: 1131-6. 108)Park, J.; Eslick, J.; Ye, Q.; Misra, A.; Spencer, P., The influence of chemical structure on the properties in methacrylate-based dentin adhesives. Dental Materials 2011; 27: 1086-93. 109)McCabe, J. F.; Rusby, S., Water absorption, dimensional change and radial pressure in resin matrix dental restorative materials. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4001-7. 110)Sideridou, I.; Tserki, V.; Papanastasiou, G., Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 655-65. 111)Ruivo, M. A.; Pacheco, R. R.; Sebold, M.; Giannini, M., Surface roughness and filler particles characterization of resin based composites. Microscopy Research and Technique 2019; 82: 1756-67. 112)Vallo, C. I.; Schroeder, W. F., Properties of acrylic bone cements formulated with Bis-GMA. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 2005; 74: 676-85. 113)Lockwood, D. B.; Wataha, J. C.; Lewis, J. B.; Tseng, W. Y.; Messer, R. L.; Hsu, S. D., Blue light generates reactive oxygen species ( ROS ) differentially in tumor vs. normal epithelial cells. Dental Materials 2005; 21: 683-8. 114)Sideridou, I. Tserki, V. Papanastasiou, G.; Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 1819-29. 115)Cadenaro, M.; Antoniolli, F.; Sauro, S.; et al. Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. European Journal of Oral Sciences 2005; 113: 525-30. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20177 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 樹脂是目前牙科中最常使用的修復材料,具有許多的優點例如:顏色與牙齒相近、操作簡易、成本低廉。但是也存在著許多的缺點,例如:耐磨耗強度不如汞合金堅固、聚合收縮、邊緣變色等。複合樹脂主要由有機單體和無機填料依照不同比例所混合而成。常見的樹脂有:PMMA、Bis-GMA、EBPDMA、UDMA、TEGDMA等。不同的樹脂依照不同的分子量、不同的結構式有著不一樣的特性。而分子量大收縮小的丙烯酸樹脂,如雙酚A丙三醇雙甲基丙烯酸酯 (Bis-GMA),常被使用作為樹脂基質,但這類樹脂的高黏度特性,使得無機填料的添加量和轉化率受到限制,常會使用低分子量的單體,如:TEGDMA常被用來當作稀釋劑,用來降低黏稠度,增加反應性、填料負載量和轉化率。然而,稀釋單體也會增加聚合收縮,產生收縮應力。導致牙齒交界面黏著失敗,邊緣變色,繼發性齲齒,術後牙齒敏感及牙髓發炎等問題。聚合收縮是造成臨床上複合樹脂填補失敗的主要原因。降低聚合收縮是目前臨床使用上的一項目標。 目前,臨床上仍未有「無收縮」的複合樹脂。單體的分子量和體積越大,聚合收縮就越小。複合樹脂最常使用的就是Bis-GMA和其衍生物。在本實驗中,我們使用新研發超分枝狀結構的單體 (HBPUA) 取代雙酚A丙三醇雙甲基丙烯酸酯 (Bis-GMA) ,並且依照不同的比例 (3:7及 6:4) 進行實驗分析,利用其超分枝狀的結構,改善其收縮率,收縮率從未添加HBPUA時的14.79 %,添加60 w% HBPUA時下降至2.3 %,並且不僅僅在收縮率上做突破,也將同時改善其硬度及彎曲強度。實驗中發現當添加到 60 w%的HBPUA,硬度達到 21.32 HV並且彎曲強度也達到87.12 MPa,這個比例能夠在硬度及彎曲強度中取得一個平衡,低於60 w%,則表現出硬度不足夠,但是有較佳的彎曲強度。目前本實驗所使用之樹脂可以有效減少收縮率並且增加硬度及彎曲強度,並且有較佳的生物相容性,未來可以於臨床牙科上作為牙科材料使用。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Resins are currently the most commonly used restorative material composite resin in dental restoration. It has many advantages such as similar color to teeth, easy to operate and low cost. But there are also many disadvantages, such as the low abrasion resistance, high polymerization shrinkage, edge discoloration, etc. Composite resins are mainly composed of organic monomers and inorganic fillers mixed in different ratio.Resins that are commonly use are: PMMA, Bis-GMA, EBPDMA, UDMA, TEGDMA,and etc. The different resins have different characteristics according to molecular weights and structural formulas. Acrylic resins with high molecular weight and low shrinkage, such as bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) , are often used as resin matrix. However, these resins have high viscosity. It which result in the limitation of the amount of inorganic fillers and the conversion rate. Therefore, Itis normally used as low molecular weight monomers. For example: TEGDMA is often used as a diluent to reduce viscosity, increase reactivity, increase filler loading and conversion, But the diluting monomer increases polymerization shrinkage and creates shrinkage stress.Caused by tooth interface failure adhesion, edge discoloration, secondary tooth decay,postoperative tooth sensitivity and pulp inflammation. Polymer shrinkage is the main reason causing failure of composite resin filling in clinical practice. Reducing polymerization shrinkage is a goal in clinics. Recently, there is zero shrinkage composite in clinic. The larger the molecular weight and volume of the monomer, the lower shrinkage. The most used composite resins are Bis-GMA and its derivatives. In experiment, we replaced the bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) with a new composite resin (HBPUA), and tested with different ratio. Because the branched structure is can reduce the shrinkage while maintaining hardness and toughness. using its branched structure to improve its Shrinkage. And not only a breakthrough in shrinkage, will also improve its hardness and toughness. According to our experiment, adding to 60 w% of HBPUA, a balance can be achieved between hardness and bending strength. Below 60 w%, the hardness is not sufficient, but it has better toughness. The resin used in this experiment can fortunately reduce shrinkage and increase hardness and toughness. It has the potential to be used as a novel restoration material in dental clinics. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T02:41:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0610202013351300.pdf: 9119326 bytes, checksum: 0e1d947940bc1580e2e7f86b9c89f98a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄 誌謝 i 摘要 ii Abstract iv 第一章 前言 1 第二章文獻回顧 3 2-1 複合樹脂 3 2.2 甲酯雙酚醇基丙烯酸酯 Bis-phenol A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) 5 2.3 三乙二醇二甲基丙烯酸酯Triethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) 6 2.4 暫時性固定式義齒 6 2.5 超分枝狀結構 (Hyperbranched) 7 2.6 填料(Filler) 8 2.7 聚合系統 9 2.8 聚合程度 11 2.9 聚合收縮 12 第三章 研究動機及目的 14 3-1 研究動機 14 3-2 研究目的 14 第四章 材料與方法 15 4-1 實驗藥品 15 4-2 實驗儀器 19 4-3 實驗流程圖 20 4-4 合成超分枝狀單體 HBPUA 21 4-5 樹質基質合成 22 4-6 表面硬度 24 4-7 三點彎曲測試 25 4-8 體積收縮 27 4-9 重量改變、吸水性、溶解性測試 29 4-10 表面親疏水性測試 30 4-11 微差式掃描熱卡計 (Differential Scanning Calorimeter, DSC) 30 4-12 生物相容性測試 (MTT assay) 31 4-12-1 樣品製作 31 4-12-2 細胞培養 32 4-13 熱電偶測量 (Thermo couple assay) 33 4-14統計分析 34 第五章 實驗結果 35 5-1 光照機照射30分鐘機械性質比較 35 5-1-1 硬度分析 35 5-1-2 彎曲強度分析 37 5-2 光照機照射30分鐘烘箱65℃持溫2小時機械性質比較 40 5-2-1 硬度分析 40 5-2-2 彎曲強度分析 42 5-3 添加催化劑聚合時間比較 45 5-4 添加微量催化劑聚合強度比較 46 5-5 比較TIH3-60不同濃度催化劑對硬度之影響 48 5-6 相同聚合條件,不同比例之樣品聚合後機械性質比較 49 5-6-1 硬度分析 49 5-6-2 彎曲強度分析 50 5-7 體積收縮 53 5-8 隨時間之重量變化、溶解性、吸水性 54 5-8-1 隨時間之重量變化、溶解性、吸水性 54 5-8-2 吸水後硬度 58 5-8-3 吸水後彎曲強度 59 5-9 表面親疏水性測試 62 5-10 微差式掃描熱卡計 (Differential Scanning Calorimeter, DSC) 64 5-11 生物相容性測試 (MTT assay) 65 5-12熱電偶測試 (Thermo couple) 67 第六章 討論 68 6-1 樹脂基質探討 68 6-2 聚合系統探討 68 6-3 機械性質分析 69 6-4 體積收縮率探討 72 6-5 隨時間之重量變化、溶解性、吸水性 74 6-6 表面親疏水性分析 75 6-7 DSC分析 76 6-8 細胞生物相容性測試 76 6-9 轉化率測試討論 77 第七章 結論 79 第八章參考文獻 81 圖目錄 Fig. 2-1 Bis-GMA結構式 6 Fig. 4-1 實驗流程圖 20 Fig. 4-2 HBPUA化學結構示意圖 21 Fig. 4-3 彎曲測試示意圖 26 Fig. 4-4體積收縮測量示意圖 28 Fig. 5-1利用微硬度測試機,分析光照30 min之不同實驗組及對照組硬度 36 Fig. 5-2利用Instron分析光照30 min之不同組別彎曲強度 38 Fig. 5-3利用Instron分析光照30 min之不同組別彎曲模數 38 Fig. 5-4利用Instron測試光照30 min之不同組別負載能量 39 Fig. 5-5 分析後硬化之不同實驗組及對照組之硬度 41 Fig. 5-6 利用Instron分析光照30 min之不同組別後硬化彎曲強度 43 Fig. 5-7 利用Instron分析光照30 min之不同組別後硬化彎曲模數 43 Fig. 5-8 利用Instron分析光照30 min之不同組別後硬化負載能量 44 Fig. 5-9 分析添加催化劑 (EDMAB) 之不同照光時間硬度 46 Fig. 5-10固定催化劑濃度 (0.1 w%) ,分析不同照光時間之硬度 47 Fig. 5-11 固定光照射時間(1 min),分析不同濃度催化劑之硬度 48 Fig. 5-12 使用微硬度測試相同聚合條件,不同比例之樣品聚合後硬度 50 Fig. 5-13 相同聚合條件,不同比例之樣品聚合後彎曲強度 51 Fig. 5-14 相同聚合條件,不同比例之樣品聚合後彎曲模數 52 Fig. 5-15 相同聚合條件,不同比例之樣品聚合後負載能量 52 Fig. 5-16 以密度天秤分析添加不同重量百分比的HBPUA對收縮率之影響 54 Fig. 5-17 不同比例實驗組及對照組泡在水中後隨時間重量改變 55 Fig. 5-18 不同比例實驗組及對照組經過28天泡水之樣品溶解性 56 Fig. 5-19 不同樣品經過28天泡水之樣品吸水性 57 Fig. 5-20 不同比例實驗組及對照組經過28天泡水之樣品硬度 58 Fig. 5-21 經過28天泡水之樣品彎曲強度 60 Fig. 5-22 經過28天泡水之樣品彎曲模數 60 Fig. 5-23 經過28天泡水之樣品負載能量 61 Fig. 5-24 不同樣品之水接觸角 63 Fig. 5-25 樣品之水接觸角量測圖 64 Fig. 5-26 不同樣品經由DSC之Tg點分析圖 65 Fig. 5-27 不同實驗組及對照組對細胞存活之影響 66 表目錄 Table 5-1利用微硬度測試機,分析光照30 min之不同實驗組及對照組硬度 36 Table 5-2利用Instron測試光照30 min之不同組別彎曲強度、彎曲模數、負載能量 39 Table 5-3 分析後硬化之不同實驗組及對照組之硬度 41 Table 5-4 利用Instron分析光照30 min之不同組別後硬化之彎曲強度、彎曲模數、負載能量 44 Table 5-5 分析添加催化劑 (EDMAB) 之不同照光時間硬度 46 Table 5-6 固定催化劑濃度 (0.1 w%) ,分析不同照光時間之硬度 47 Table 5-7 固定光照射時間(1 min),分析不同濃度催化劑之硬度 49 Table 5-8 使用微硬度測試相同聚合條件,不同比例之樣品聚合後硬度 50 Table 5-9不同比例之樣品聚合後彎曲強度、彎曲模數、負載能量 53 Table 5-10 密度天秤分析添加不同重量百分比的HBPUA對收縮率之影響 54 Table 5-11 不同比例實驗組及對照組泡在水中後隨時間重量改變 56 Table 5-12 經過28天泡水之樣品溶解性 57 Table 5-13 經過28天泡水之樣品吸水性 57 Table 5-14 經過28天泡水之樣品硬度 58 Table 5-15 經過28天泡水之硬度老化程度 59 Table 5-16 經過28天泡水之樣品彎曲強度、彎曲強度、負載能量 61 Table 5-17 不同樣品之水接觸角 63 Table 5-18 不同實驗組及對照組對細胞存活之影響 66 Table 5-19 熱電偶測試之腔體溫度 67 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 開發具有高硬度及彎曲強度、低收縮率新型複合樹脂 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Development of a new composite resin with clinical need-low shrinkage, high hardness, high flexural strength. | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭國忠(Kuo-Chung Cheng) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 複合樹脂,聚合收縮,修復材料,硬度,彎曲強度, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | composite resin,polymerization shrinkage,restore materials,hardness,flexural strength, | en |
dc.relation.page | 89 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202004241 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-10-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 口腔生物科學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 口腔生物科學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-0610202013351300.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 8.91 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。