Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 財務金融學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20075
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor王耀輝(Yaw-Huei Wang)
dc.contributor.authorWei-Feng Hsuen
dc.contributor.author許維峰zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T02:39:41Z-
dc.date.copyright2018-06-25
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2018-06-16
dc.identifier.citationArditti, F., 1967. Risk and the required return on equity.
The Journal of Finance 22, 19–36.
Bali, T., Cakici, N., Whitelaw, R., 2011. Maxing out: stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics 99, 427–446.
Barberis, N., Huang, M., 2008. Stocks as lotteries: the implications of probability weighting for security prices. American Economic Review 98, 2066–2100.
Blau, B., Bowles, T., Whitby, R., 2016. Gambling preferences, options markets, and volatility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 51, 515–540.
Boyer, B., Vorkink, K., 2014. Stock options as lotteries. The Journal of Finance 69, 1485–1527.
Byun, S., Kim, D., (2016) Gambling preference and individual equity option returns. Journal of Financial Economics 122,155–174
Carhart, M., 1997. On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance 52, 57–82.
Cox, J., Ross, S., Rubinstein, M., 1979. Option pricing: a simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics 7, 229–263.
Easley, D., O'Hara, M., Srinivas, P., 1998. Option volume and stock prices: Evidence on where informed traders trade. The Journal of Finance 53, 431-465.
Fama, E., French, K., 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3–56.
Fama, E., MacBeth, J., 1973. Risk, return, and equilibrium: empirical tests.
The Journal of Political Economy 81, 607–636.
Goyal, A., Saretto, A., 2009. Cross-section of option returns and volatility.
Journal of Financial Economics 94, 310–326.

Green, T., Hwang, B., 2012. Initial public offerings as lotteries: skewness preference and first-day returns. Management Science 58, 432–444.
Harvey, C., Siddique, A., 2000. Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests.
The Journal of Finance 55, 1263–1295.
Johnson, T., So, E., 2012. The option to stock volume ratio and future returns. Journal of Financial Economics 106, 262-286
Kim, D., Han, J., Byun, S., Informed trading in options market and stock return predictability. Working paper
Roll, R., Schwartz, E., Subrahmanyam, A., 2010. O/S: The relative trading activity in options and stock. Journal of Financial Economics 96, 1-17.
Scott, R., Horvath, P., 1980. On the direction of preference for moments of higher order than the variance. The Journal of Finance 35, 915–919 .
Rubinstein, M., 1994. Implied binomial trees. The Journal of Finance 49, 771-818.
Xing, Y., Zhang, X., Zhao, R., 2010. What does the individual option volatility smirk tell us about future equity returns? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 45, 641-662.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20075-
dc.description.abstract本文欲研究市場參與者的相對比例是否會影響美股個股選擇權市場中的賭博行為的偏好。文中所有原始個股選擇權資料皆從Ivy OptionMetrics資料庫中獲得,個股財報資料則由Compustat資料庫取得。論文中的樣本由約略一個月到期的價平個股買權所組成。在建立投資組合之前,所有樣本資料須先透過篩選以確保該選擇權的流動性,並排除資料庫註記錯誤的資料。資料透過篩選後,我們於每季的第一個選擇權到期日(通常為該月第三個星期五)的隔天做為投資組合建立日。在投資組合建立日,我們將所有約一個月到期的買權做分類:先依低、中、高隱含波動度斜率分成三組,每組內再依買權的標的資產樂透相似性進行分類,共分十組。在這樣的雙重分類下,對於每季,我們共有三十組投資組合。因為我們關心的是對於標的資產樂透相似性所建的投資組合,是否可以在隱涵波動度不同下能獲得不同等級的報酬,我們著重於以下四個投資組合的報酬與其報酬解釋:依據標的資產的樂透相似性買一賣十(買標的資產最不像樂透、賣最像樂透的)、買一賣十配上低隱含波動度、買一賣十配上中等隱含波動度、以及買一賣十加上高隱含波動度。
在實證研究中我們發現:該投資組合在配合低隱含波動度時,可獲得的報酬遠大於高隱含波動度時可獲得的報酬。而為了排除此高報酬是對於市場風險或是公司個別風險的風險補貼,我們也做了風險調整後的模型:在對系統性風險和企業風險進行調整後,實證結果仍然維持不變。另外,我們也使用另一個標的資產樂透相似性的指標來替換原指標,結果仍維持相同。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWe scrutinize the effect of relative strength of market participants on gambling preference in U.S. individual equity option market. Sample data are from Ivy OptionMetrics and underlying asset data are from Compustat, respectively. We choose at-the-money call options of individual equity with roughly one month to maturity. After data are filtered, we calculate two variables of interest: MAX (10) and SKEW for all call options. Then, within each quarter, we firstly sorted all options into three different SKEW groups. Within each skew group, we then sort our call options into decile portfolios based upon MAX (10). Long-short portfolios based upon MAX (10) are then constructed within each SKEW group. We observe that returns of long short strategies capitalizing on investors’ gambling preference are more profitable when option market is dominated by volatility-informed traders, indicating their gambling preference is higher than their counterparts, price-informed traders. The empirical result remains robust after adjusting for systematic risk and firm-specific risk which may partially compensate the return of the long-short portfolios. In addition, an alternative measurement of stock’s resemblance to lottery is implemented for robustness concern, and the result is indifferent between two measurements.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T02:39:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-106-R04723030-1.pdf: 1075139 bytes, checksum: c0710bc77822245d4c002681471f2fe0 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目 錄
中文摘要………………………………………………………………………… i
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………. ii
第一章 文獻探討與簡介………………………………………………………………………….. 6-11
第二章 原始資料………………………………………………………………………………. 10-14
第三章 方法論………………………………………………………………….……………….. 15-19
第四章 實證研究分析……………………………………………………………..…………….. 19-27
4.1系統性風險調整………………………………………………………………..…………… 19-21
4.2公司個別風險調整……………………………………………………………….…………… 21-25
4.3風險調控後報酬與合併回歸………………………………………………….……… 25-27
第五章 穩定分析………………………………………………………………………………….….. 27-29
第六章 結論……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 29-30
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………………………..…33-34
附錄………………………………………………………………………………. 31-32
 
附錄、表目錄
附錄 Appendix A…………………………………… 31
附錄 Appendix B…………………………………… 32
表一…………………………………… 35-36
表二…………………………………… 37-38
表三…………………………………… 39
表四…………………………………… 40
表五…………………………………… 41-42
表六…………………………………… 43-44
表七…………………………………… 45-46
表八…………………………………… 47-48
dc.language.isoen
dc.title個股選擇權中市場賭博行為和參與者互動效果zh_TW
dc.titleParticipant Effect on Gambling Preference in Individual Equity Option Marketen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee王之彥(Jr-Yan Wang),蔡維哲(Wei-Che Tsai)
dc.subject.keyword賭博偏好,個股選擇權,隱含波動度斜率,避險策略,資產定價,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordGambling preference,volatility smirk,individual equity options,hedging strategies,asset pricing,en
dc.relation.page48
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201701040
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2018-06-19
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept財務金融學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:財務金融學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-106-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
1.05 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved