請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20016完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳耀宗(Yao-Tsung Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Jung Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳昱融 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T02:38:49Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-07-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 廖秀梅、王貞靜、戚務君，2010，一套臺灣完整的審計公費資訊告訴我們什麼？中華會計學刊。
劉晏秀，2004，我國董監事特性與審計公費及非審計公費關聯性之研究，政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。 Aldamen, H., J. Hollindale, and J. L. Ziegelmayer. 2018. Female audit committee members and their influence on audit fees. Accounting and Finance 58: 57–89 Asthana, S. C., and J. P. Boone. 2012. Abnormal audit fee and audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31 (3): 1–22. Bandyopadhyay, S. P., and J. L. Kao. 2004. Market structure and audit fees: A local analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (3): 529–561. Barua, A., L. F. Davidson, D. V. Rama, and S. Thiruvadi. 2010, CFO gender and accruals quality, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 24 No. 1: 25-40. Barber, B. M., and T. Odean. 2011. Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics116: 261–292 Beck M. J. and E. G. Mauldin. 2014. Who's really in charge? audit committee versus CFO power and audit fees. The Accounting Review Vol. 89, No. 6(November): 2057-2085. Bedard, J., and K. M. Johnstone. 2004. Earnings manipulation risk, corporate governance risk, and auditors’ planning and pricing decisions. The Accounting Review 79 (2): 277–304. Behn, B. K., D. L. Searcy, and J. B. Woodroof. 2006. A within firm analysis of current and expected future audit lag determinants. Journal of Practice & Theory 33(2): 27–57. Brown, P., W. Beekes, and P. Verhoeven. 2011. Corporate governance, accounting, and finance: A review. Accounting and Finance 51: 96–172. Carcello, J., D. Hermanson, and Z. Ye. 2011. Corporate governance research in accounting and auditing: Insights, practice implications, and future research directions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (3): 1–31. Casterella, J., J. Francis, B. Lewis, and P. Walker. 2004. Auditor industry specialization, client bargaining power, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1): 123–140. Christensen, B., T. Omer, N. Sharp, and M. Shelley. 2013. Pork bellies and public company audits: Have audits once again become just another commodity? Working paper, Texas A&M University. Cohen, J., G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. Wright. 2010. Corporate governance in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era: Auditor experiences. Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (3): 751–786. Cohn, R. A., W. G. Lewellen, R. C. Lease, and G. G. Schlarbaum. 1975, Individual investor risk aversion and investment portfolio composition, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 30 No. 2: 605-620. Dechow, P.M., and I. D. Dichev. 2002. The Quality if accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors, The Accounting Review 77(4): 35–59. DzZoort, F. T. 1997. An investigation of audit committees’ oversight responsibilities.Abacus(September): 208–227 Dhaliwal, D. S., P. T. Lamoreaux, C. S. Lennox, and L. M. Mauler. 2014. Management influence on auditor selection and subsequent impairments of auditor independence during the post-SOX period. Contemporary Accounting Research (forthcoming). Doogar, R., P. Sivadasan, and I. Solomon. 2010. The regulation of public company auditing: Evidence from the transition to AS5. Journal of Accounting Research 48 (4): 795–814. Doogar, R., S. Rowe, and P. Sivadasan. 2013. Asleep at the wheel (again)? Bank audits during the financial crisis. Contemporary Accounting Research (forthcoming). Elias, S. 2008. Fifty years of influence in the workplace: The evolution of the French and Raven power taxonomy. Journal of Management History 14 (3): 267–283. Fama, E. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288–307. Fehr-Duda, H., M. DeGennaro, and R. Schubert. 2006, Gender, financial risk, and probability weights, Theory and Decision, Vol. 60 Nos 2/3: 283-313. Finkelstein, S., and D. Hambrick. 1990. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 484–503. Francis, J., and D. Simon. 1987. A test of audit pricing in the small-client segment of the U.S. audit market. The Accounting Review 62 (1): 145–157. Francis, B., I. Hasan, and Q. Wu. 2014. The impact of CFO gender on bank loan contracting. Journal of accounting auditing and Finance 28(1): 53–78. Galinsky, A., J. Magee, D. Gruenfeld, J. Whitson, and K. Liljenquist. 2008. Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95 (6): 1450–1466. Geiger, M. A., and D. V. Rama. 2003. Audit fees, nonaudit fees, and auditor reporting on stressed companies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 22 (2): 53-69. Ghosh, A., and R. Pawlewicz. 2009. The impact of regulation on auditor fees: Evidence from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Auditing: Journal of Practice and Theory 28 (2): 171-197. Gilson, S. C. 1990. Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 355– 387. Hogan, C., and M. Wilkins. 2008. Evidence on the audit risk model: Do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies? Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (1): 219–242. Hoitash, R., U. Hoitash, and J. Bedard. 2008. Internal control quality and audit pricing under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 27 (1): 105-126. Huang, J., and D. Kisgen. 2013. Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative female executives? Journal of financial economical, Vol.108(3): 822–839. Huang, H., L. Liu, K. Raghunandan, and V. Rama. 2007. Auditor industry specialization, client bargaining power, and audit fees: Further evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26 (1): 147–158. Huang, H. W., R. J. Parker, Y. C. A. Yan, and Y-H. Lin. 2014. CEO Turnover and Audit Pricing. Accounting Horizons 28 (2): 297-312. Huang, T.C., H. W. Huang, and C. C. Lee. 2014, Corporate executive’s gender and audit fees. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 29 Issue: 6: 527-547 Ittonen, K., J. Miettinen, and S. Vahamaa. 2008, Does female representation in audit committee affect audit fees? Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol.49 Nos 3/4: 113–119 Jacobides, M. 2009. Don’t let this crisis go to waste. Business Strategy Review, Global Leadership Summit 2009 Special Issue: 69–75. Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360. Kim, Y., H. Li, and S. Li. 2015. CEO Equity Incentives and Audit Fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 32 (2): 608-638. KPMG. 2004. Oversights if auditors: Audit committee roundtable highlights. Audit Committee Insights (Spring). Krishnan, G., and G. Visvanathan. 2009. Do auditors price audit committee’s expertise? The case of accounting vs. non-accounting financial experts. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 24 (1): 115–144. Mayhew, B. W., and M. S. Wilkins. 2003. Audit firm industry specialization as a differentiation strategy: Evidence from fees charged to firms going public. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (2): 33–52. O’Keefe, T., D. Simunic, and M. Stein. 1994. The production of audit services: Evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research 32: 241–261. Olsen, R.A. and C. M. Cox. 2001. The influence of gender on the perception and response to investment risk: the case of professional investors. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets. Vol. 2 No. 1: 29-36. Powell, M. and D. Ansic. 1997. Gender differences in risk behavior in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology 18(6): 605–628 Raghunandan, K., and D. Rama. 2006. SOX Section 404 material weakness disclosures and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25 (1): 99–114. Riley, W.B. and K. V. Chow. 1992. Asset allocation and individual risk aversion. Financial Analysts Journal. Vol. 48 No. 6: 32-37. Sahlman, W. A. 1990. Why sane people shouldn’t serve on public boards. Harvard Business Review 68 (May-June): 28–35. Simsek, Z. 2007. CEO tenure and organizational performance: An intervening model. Strategic Management Journal 28: 653–662. Simunic, D. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1): 161–190. Stanley, J. 2011. Is the audit fee disclosure a leading indicator of clients’ business risk? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (3): 157-179. Wei, Z.B. and F. X. Xie. 2016. CFO Gender and Earnings Management: Evidence from China. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol46(4): 881–905. Whisenant, S., S. Sankaraguruswamy, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non-audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (4): 721–744. Zajac, E., and J. Westphal. 1996. Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal 39 (1): 64–90. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20016 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 台灣因2003年實施資訊揭露評鑑系統及2009、2010年導入IFRS後，上市上櫃公司揭露審計公費比例大幅提高，為審計公費研究提供更充足的樣本。而近年來，不管是法律面還是政策面，台灣積極推行審計委員會的制度，希望增強公司治理。然而，審計委員會決議會計師審計公費的權責，是否會因為財務主管為了經營績效而被干預。因此，本論文針對，審計委員會與財務主管相對影響力對審計公費的影響，並討論財務主管是否為女性對其相對影響力的影響進行研究。
本研究以我國2009年至2016設有審計委員會之上市上櫃公司為研究對象，迴歸結果顯示，(1)財務主管任期相對於審計委員會任期大(小)時，審計公費相對較低(高)，(2)若財務主管為女性時，財務主管與審計委員會相對影響力對審計公費的影響幅度下降。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Deeping corporate governance mechanism in the listed companies is one of the Corporate Governance Roadmap established by the government in Taiwan. The recent increase of disclosing audit fees in the Taiwanese listed companies, facilitating this current study, was due to the following two reasons. One is the implementation of the Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking system in 2003, and the other is the adoption of IFRS in 2009 and 2010. One of the oversight functions of audit committees is to select company’s external auditor, and approve the auditor’s audit fees. This study examines whether the relative power of an audit committee versus a CFO and audit fees. Besides, this study also examines the effect on the gender of CFO to the relative power.
Using a sample of Taiwanese listed companies with an audit committee from 2009 to 2016, the study finds that the greater (smaller) CFO tenure relative to audit committee tenure, the more(less) audit fees for the listed firms. In addition, when the CFO is a female, the relative power of an audit committee versus a CFO to audit fees will decline. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T02:38:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05722047-1.pdf: 3312697 bytes, checksum: fdb17e417ad75f330e8b851b2f3eb782 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要、i
Abstract、ii 第一章、緒論 1 第一節、研究動機 1 第二節、研究目的 2 第三節、研究架構 3 第二章、文獻探討 5 第一節、權力與審計公費相關文獻探討 5 第二節、審計委員會權力與審計公費相關文獻探討 6 第三節、財務主管權力與審計公費相關文獻探討 7 第四節、財務主管之性別相關文獻探討 8 第三章、研究方法 10 第一節、研究假說 10 第二節、設定模型及變數衡量 12 第三節、樣本選取及資料來源 18 第四章、實證結果與分析 20 第一節、敘述性統計及相關係數分析 20 第二節、實證結果分析 25 第三節、敏感性測試 29 第五章、研究結論與限制 39 第一節、研究結論 39 第二節、研究限制與建議 39 參考文獻、41 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 審計委員會與財務主管相對影響力與審計公費之關聯性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Relative Power of an Audit Committee versus a CFO and Audit Fees | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪聖閔(Shen-gmin Hung),曾智揚(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 審計公費,審計委員會,財務主管,女性財務主管, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Audit Fees,Audit Committee,CFO,Female CFO, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 45 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801480 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.24 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。