請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/19033
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 范正成 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yun-Wei Tan | en |
dc.contributor.author | 譚允維 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:42:55Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-30 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 地基處理手冊編寫委員會,1988,地基處理手冊,中國建築工業出版社。
2. 行政院環保署,2008,土壤及地下水受比水重非水相液體污染場址之整治技術選取、系統設計要點與注意事項參考手冊。 3. 林永昇、周偉龍,2014,乳化安定性快速檢測系統,科儀新知199期,第81頁。 4. 林靜齡,2011,乳化奈米零價鐵於地下水之傳輸性評估,國立中興大學環境工程研究所,碩士論文。 5. 施國琅,2008,超微粒水泥漿體滲透灌漿與灌注量之研究,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程研究所,碩士論文。 6. 范正成、黃建霖、施國琅、黃聖修、莊偉成,2008超微粒水泥漿體滲透灌與注量之研超微粒水泥漿體滲透灌與注量之研究,九十七年度農業工程研討會,台北市。 7. 范正成、黃建霖、莊偉成、連琮勛,2009,超微粒水泥漿體滲透灌對砂柱試力傳導度之影響,九十八年度農業工程研討會,台中市。 8. 倪至寬、林任峰,2006,超細水泥漿液滲透灌漿之研究,臺北科技大學學報,95年09號。 9. 張永宜,2007,乳化奈米級零價鐵處理水溶液中之三氯乙烯,國立中山大學環境工程研究所,碩士論文。 10. 張書奇,江蓬鈺,2014,以奈米乳化液與奈米氧化鐵作為河川底泥污染整治助劑之研究:由實驗室到模場試驗,土壤及地下水污染整治;1卷2期,第141~163頁。 11. 許茹婷、李依穎、陳明華、EcoCycle Co,2010,應用現地生物降解法進行地下水中含氯乙烯類有機物質污染場址之模場試驗,冠誠環境科技工程股份有限公司。 12. 連宗勛,2010,應用禁忌演算法於超微粒水泥漿體滲透灌漿在砂性粉土層之可灌性研究,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程研究所,碩士論文。 13. 郭育嘉,2013,應用現地乳化油生物屏障處理受含氯有機物污染之地下水,國立中山大學環境工程研究所,博士論文。 14. 陳逸明,2009,以乳化型基質處理受三氯乙烯污染之地下水,國立中山大學環境工程研究所,碩士論文。 15. 黃宇伶,2013,以長效型基質處理受三氯乙烯污染之地下水,國立中山大學環境工程研究所,碩士論文。 16. 黃建霖、范正成、楊文仁,2007,超微細水泥灌漿材料於砂性粉土層之應用,地工技術,第111 期71-82 頁。 17. 劉嘉庭,2011,利用乳化型釋碳基質提昇三氯乙烯污染地下水之生物降解效率:現地模場試驗,國立中山大學環境工程研究所,碩士論文。 18. 蔡昀達,1997,地下水生物整治技術及案例介紹,中興工程顧問股份有限公司。 19. 簡華逸,2009,應用現地生物整治技術處理受三氯乙烯污染之地下水,國立中山大學環境工程研究所,博士論文。 20. ASTM C136-06, 2006, “Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates”, Annual Book of ASTM Specification, Philadelphia, PA. 21. ASTM D422-63, 2007, “Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils“, Annual Book of ASTM Specification, Philadelphia, PA. 22. ASTM D854-02, 2002, “Determination of Specific Gravity of Soils“, Annual Book of ASTM Specification, Philadelphia, PA. 23. Dano, C., P.Y. Hicher and S. Taillez, 2004, “Engineering Properties of Grouted Sands”Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 3, pp. 328-338. 24. Edward, S and I. Walter, 2013, “Computational and Experimental Investigation of Contaminantplume Response to DNAPL Source Zone Architectureand Depletion in Porous and Fractured Media, Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program“, project ER-1610. 25. Fiore, S and M.C. Zanetti, 2011, “Evaluation of Hydrogen/Oxygen Release Compounds for the Remediation of VOCs“, American Journal of Environmental Sciences, pp.468-476. 26. Ishihara, K, 1993, “Liquefaction and Flow Failure during Earthquakes“, Geotechnique 43(3):629-644. 27. Kapo, M.C and C.B Robert, 2006, “Transport of Edible Oil Emulsions in Clayey Sands: One-Dimensional Column Results and Model Development“. 28. Kapo, M.C; M.L Cameron; and C.B. Robert, 2006, “Transport of Edible Oil Emulsions in Clayey Sands: One-Dimensional Column Results and Model Development“. 29. Ladd, R.D, 1978, “Prepraring Test Specimens Using Undercompaction, Geotechnical Testing Journal“, GTJODJ, vol. 1, No 1, march 1978, pp.16-23. 30. Magg ,1938, “Ueber Die Verfestigung Und Dictung Des Bangrundes (Injektionen), Course on soil mech. “, Zurich Tech. School. 31. Michael, D.L, 2003, “Pilots To Enhance Trichloroethene Reductive Dechlorination and Ferrous Sulfide Abiotictransformation”. 32. Mohamed, G.E., 1981, “Effect of Irrigation Frequency on Grain Yield Components of Faba Beans“, FABIS Newsl: 39. 33. MWH Americas Inc., Taiwan Branch, 2014, “功學社教育用品股份有限公司過嶺第一場地下水污染整治場址之污染整治計畫“. 34. Ozgurel, H. G., and C. Vipulanandan, 2005, “Effect of Grain Size and Distribution on Permeability and Mechanical Behavior of Acrylamide Grouted Sand“, Journal of Geotechnical And Geoenvironmental Engineering ASCE, Vol.131, No.12, pp.1457-146. 35. Saiyouri, N., M.Bouasker and A.Khelidj, 2008, “Gas Permeability Measurement on Injected Soils with Cement Grout. Cement and Concrete Research“, Vol. 38, No.1, pp.95-103. 36. Schwarz, L.G., and M.Chirumalla, 2007, “Effect of injection pressure on permeability and strength of microfine cement grouted sand“, Grouting for Ground Improvement: GSP 168 Geo-Denver 2007: New Peaks in Geotechniques. 37. Soga, K, S.K.A. Au, M.R. Jafari, M.D. Bolton, 2004, “Laboratory Investigation of Multiple Grout Injections into Clay“, Geotechnique, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 81–90. 38. Terzaghi, K. and R.B Peck. 1948, “Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice“. John Wiley&Sons, New York. 39. Whiting, K, P.Evans, B.Henry, J.Wilson, R.Olsen, E.Becvar and C.Lebron, 2008, “In Situ Biogeochemical Transformation of Chlorinated Ethenes Using Engineered Treatment System. “ Biogeochemical Transformation Report 092008.doc. 40. Zebovitz, S, R. J. Krizek, and D. K. Atmatzidis., 1989, “Injection of Fine Sands with Very Fine Cement Grout“, Journal Geotechnical Engineering, n12, pp.1717-173. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/19033 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 現地生物整治法為現今常被應用於地下水受含氯有機物污染之整治方式。此法常利用重力流方式使基質自然沈降並擴散,但此種方式不易確認基質是否能有效地滲透且均勻地散佈於欲整治範圍。
因此,本研究應用大地工程中常用於土壤改良之滲透灌漿技術進行基質注入技術之研究試驗,藉由自行設計的高速渦輪攪拌機及氣壓式灌漿設備,以低壓滲透灌漿的方式,將三種市售基質(EOS、HRC及EcoClean)灌注於7種不同級配分佈之土柱試體中(A土(D50=0.51mm)、B土(D50=0.45mm)、C土(D50=0.30mm)、D土(D50=0.27mm)、E土(D50=0.25mm)、F土(D50=0.01mm)及G土(D50=0.05mm)),以滲透性與持續性來評估不同土層條件下之各種基質適用性。 滲透性試驗結果發現,於A土試驗中三種基質皆能達到目標灌注高度;於B土、C土及D土試體中,僅EcoClean能達到目標灌注高度,而HRC與EOS未能達目標高度;E土試體中,HRC、EOS及EcoClean三種基質僅可分別滲透至48cm、42cm及43cm,而於F土及G土試體中,三種基質皆無法滲透。 持續性試驗結果發現,A土、B土、C土及D土試體中,HRC之殘留率較佳,EOS次之,而EcoClean較其他二者為差;而於E土試體中,三種基質之殘留率皆超過94%,其中又以EOS之殘留率較為佳,其次為HRC,而EcoClean較差。 綜合而言,本研究發現除了基質之特性外,滲透性或是持續性皆與土壤之D10有關,其相關係數可分別高達0.96即0.78;因此,土壤之D10 可用作可灌性評估之依據。未來對於與A土、B土、C土及D土粒徑分佈相似之土壤,建議使用HRC基質進行灌注。而對於與E土、F土及G土粒徑分佈相似之土壤,由於三種基質之滲透性皆較低,故未來建議能朝向提高稀釋比例、增加灌注壓力等方向努力,以改善滲透不佳之情形。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The method of in-situ bioremediation has been widely used to treat the groundwater polluted by chlorinated organic compounds. This method by gravity flow is commonly used, so that the substrates or nutrients will settle and diffuse freely. However, it is difficult to confirm whether the substrates are distributed effectively and evenly in the areas to be treated.
Therefore, in this research, a method of permeation grouting which has been often used in geotechnical engineering to improve the soil was applied to inject substrate. With the self-designed high speed vortex colloidal mixer and air compressor system, 3 kinds of commercial substrate (EOS, HRC and EcoClean) is permeably injected into 7 kinds of different soil column-shaped specimens (Soil A(D50=0.51mm)、Soil B(D50=0.45mm)、Soil C(D50=0.30mm)、Soil D(D50=0.27mm)、Soil E(D50=0.25mm)、Soil F(D50=0.01mm) and Soil G(D50=0.05mm)),and the indexes of the permeability and persistence will be used to evaluate the applicability of these 3 kinds substrate. The permeability results are as follows. For the specimens of Soil A, the targeted heights of permeation grouting was reached for the 3 kinds of substrates. As for the specimens of Soil B, Soil C and Soil D, only EcoClean could reach the targeted heights; however, HRC and EOS could not reach the targeted heights. For the specimens of Soil E, HRC, EOS and EcoClean can only be grouted to 48(cm), 42(cm) and 43(cm), respectively. For the specimens of Soil F and Soil G, those 3 kinds substrate are completely unable to be grouted. The results of persistence showed that the retention rates of the substrates, in decreasing order, were HRC, EOS and EcoClean. As for the specimen of Soil E, the persistence of 3 kinds substrate are more than 94%, and the persistence in decreasing order, were EOS, EOS and EcoClean. Generally speaking, it is found that the permeability and persistence is affected by not only the properties of substrate, but also the D10 of the soil. The R2 of D10 between the permeability and the persistence are 0.96 and 0.78, respectively. Therefore, the D10 of soil may be used to assess the goutability. For the soils with particle size distribution similar to that of Soils A, B, C and D, HRC is suggested to be used. As for the Soils with particle size distribution similar to that of Soils E, F and G, because of low permeability, it is suggested to increase dilution ratio and injection pressure to improve the permeation in the future. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:42:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03622020-1.pdf: 4484939 bytes, checksum: ba0d0307f30f1c9aa4bfff4ad4f09ec0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
誌謝 II 摘要 III Abstract IV 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XV 第一章 前言 1 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2.1現地生物整治技術 4 2.1.1生物整治技術之原理與反應機制 4 2.1.2常用之基質注入工法 5 2.1.3小結 6 2.2.1滲透灌漿 10 2.2.2既有的滲透灌漿可灌性評估方法 10 2.2.3室內滲透灌漿試驗 12 2.2.4滲透灌漿方式 13 2.2.5雙環塞灌注工法 17 2.3基質與基質管柱滲透試驗 19 2.3.1基質管柱滲透試驗 19 2.3.2乳化油基質EOS 20 2.3.3釋氫物質HRC 21 2.3.4水溶性機質EcoClean 21 2.3.5小結 21 2.4砂柱試體製作與準備 21 2.5案例介紹 22 2.5.1阿爾特斯空軍基地 22 2.5.2 達格威試驗場 23 2.5.3功學社 23 2.5.4小結 23 第三章 研究方法 33 3.1 試驗材料 33 3.1.1 基質材料及其性質 33 3.1.2 基質灌注方式 34 3.1.3 試驗砂土 36 3.1.4 試驗砂土基本性質試驗 36 3.1.5 濾材 42 3.2 滲透灌注模擬試驗 48 3.2.1滲透灌漿模擬試驗規劃 48 3.2.2滲透灌漿模擬試驗設備 48 3.3滲透灌漿模擬試驗步驟 55 第四章 結果與討論 62 4.1基質於砂柱試體中之滲透性試驗 62 4.1.1滲透性試驗之結果 62 4.1.2滲透性試驗之綜合討論 67 4.2基質於砂柱試體中之持續性試驗 68 4.2.1重量烘乾濃度之結果 68 4.2.2 pH值變化之結果 70 4.2.3 試體中殘留率之結果 72 4.2.4持續性試驗之綜合討論 73 4.2.5滲透性與持續性之評估 74 第五章 結論與建議 87 5.1結論 87 5.2建議 88 第六章 參考文獻 90 附錄 94 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 滲透灌漿技術於地下水生物整治應用之實驗室研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Experimental Study on the Application of the Permeation Injection Technique to Groundwater Bioremediation | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李達源,楊國鑫 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 現地生物整治,滲透灌漿,基質,含氯有機物,地下水污染, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | in-situ bioremediation,permeation grouting,substrate,chlorinated organic compound,groundwater pollution, | en |
dc.relation.page | 111 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201602383 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物環境系統工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.38 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。