請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18837完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇珍頤(Chen-Yi Su) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Woei-Haur Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林暐豪 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:29:50Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-07-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. Bland, J. M., & Altman D. G. (1995). Multiple significance tests: The Bonferroni method. BMJ, 310, 170. Brackett, M. A., Warner, R. M., & Bosco, J. S. (2005). Emotional intelligence and relationship quality among couples. Personal Relationships, 12, 197-212. Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wilhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3, 48-67. De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Cooperative outcome independence, task reflexity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 628-638. De Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S. L., & Oldersma, F. L. (1999). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 348-362. De Zavala, A. G., Federico, C. M., Cislak, A., & Digger, J. (2008). Need for closure and competition in intergroup conflict: experimental evidence for the mitigating effect of accessible conflict-schemas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 84-105. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. Goldin, P. R., McRae, K., Ramel, W., & Gross, J. J. (2008). The neural bases of emotion regulation: Reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biological Psychiatry, 63(6), 577-586. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271-299. Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281-291. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362. Gross, J.J., & Thompson, R.A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J.J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3-26). New York: Guilford Press. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300. Huang, C.-Y. (2010). Team innovation climate and need for cognitive closure on information sharing and innovation performance. Doctoral dissertation in National Taiwan University. Kosic, A. (2002). Acculturation Attitudes, Need for Cognitive Closure, and Adaptation of Immigrants. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(2), 179-201. Kosic, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2004). The Social Cognition of Immigrants' Acculturation: Effects of the Need for Closure and the Reference Group at Entry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 796-813. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge. New York: Plenum Press. Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Motivations for judging and knowing: Implications for social attributions. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: foundations of social behavior (pp. 335-368). New York: Guildford. Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). The psychology of closed mindedness. New York: Have Psychology Press. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468. Lazarus, R. S., & Alfert, E. (1964). Short-circuiting of threat by experimentally altering cognitive appraisal. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 195-205. Liao, H.-W., & Chen, C.-L. (2011). Identity status, self-defining memory, and psychological well-being in emerging adulthood. Research in Applied Psychology, 51, 79-110. Mauss, I. B., Cook, C. L., Cheng, J. Y. J., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Individual differences in cognitive reappraisal: Experiential and physiological responses to an anger provocation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 66(2), 116-124. McRae, K., Gross, J. J., Webster, J., Robertson, E. R., Sokol-Hessner, P., Ray, R. D., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Oschner, K. N. (2012). The development of emotion regulation: An fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal in children, adolescents and young adults. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(1), 11-22. McRae, K., Hughes, B., Chopra, S., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Gross, J. J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2010). The neural bases of distraction and reappraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(2), 248-262. McRae, K., Jacobs, S. E., Ray, R. D., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2012). Individual differences in reappraisal ability: Links to reappraisal frequency, well-being, and cognitive control. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 2-7. McRae, K., Misra, S., Prasad, A. K., Pereira, S. C., & Gross, J. J. (2012). Bottom-up and top-down emotion generation: Implications for emotion regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(3), 253-262. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 569-582. Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2007). The neural architecture of emotion regulation. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford Press. Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Cognitive emotion regulation: Insights from social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 153-158. Perez, C. R., & Soto, J. A. (2011). Cognitive reappraisal in the context of oppression: Implications for psychological functioning. Emotion, 11(3), 675-680. Richards, J. M. (2004). The cognitive consequences of concealing feelings. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 131-134. Richards, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 410-424. Roberts, N. A., Tsai, J. L., & Coan, J. A. (2007). Emotion elicitation using dyadic interaction tasks. In J. S. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 106-123). New York: Oxford University Press. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727. Sheppes, G., Catran, E., & Meiran, N. (2009). Reappraisal (but not distraction) is going to make you sweat: Physiological evidence for self-control effort. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 91-96. Sheppes, G., & Meiran, N. (2007). Better late than never? On the dynamics of online regulation of sadness using distraction and cognitive reappraisal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(11), 1518-1532. Sheppes, G., & Meiran, N. (2008). Divergent cognitive costs for online forms of reappraisal and distraction. Emotion, 8(6), 870-874. Sheppes, G., Scheibe, S., Suril, G., & Gross, J. J. (2011). Emotion-regulation choice. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1391-1396. Stewart, S. M., Byrne, B. M., Lee, P. W. H., Ho, L. M., Kennard, B. D., Hughes, C., & Emslie, G. (2003). Personal versus interpersonal contributions to depressive symptoms among Hong Kong adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 160-169. Thompson, E. P., Roman, R. J., Moskowitz, G. B., & Chaiken, S. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 447-489. Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 25-52. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062. Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across genders in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1259-1268. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18837 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 許多過去研究顯示認知重評對心理健康有正面影響。然而，採用認知重評的益處可能會因為個體在認知閉合需求上的差異而有所不同。因為認知重評需經過大量認知歷程，且低認知閉合需求的個體對認知的重新建構較為開放，我們假設低認知閉合需求的個體能夠從認知重評的運用中有較多獲益，而高認知閉合需求者則否。本研究結果指出，日常生活中的高頻率認知重評使用者通常是那些低認知閉合需求的個體。並且，低認知閉合需求的個體比高認知閉合需求的個體更能藉由認知重評對心理健康及人際關係有正向的影響，而低認知閉合需求者這方面的優勢在個體使用注意力分散為情緒調節策略時就變得比較小或甚至劣於高認知閉合需求者。上面這些結果顯示認知閉合需求確實在認知重評與健康指標的關係中扮演了重要的角色。研究結果的意涵以及未來發展方向也在本文中進行討論。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Most past research findings showed that cognitive reappraisal has positive effects on psychological well-being. However, the benefits associated with cognitive reappraisal may be affected by individual differences in need for cognitive closure (NFCC). Because cognitive reappraisal requires a good amount of cognitive processing and individuals low on NFCC are more accustomed to engaging in effortful cognitive activity, we hypothesized that individuals low on NFCC would use cognitive reappraisal more frequently and effectively compared to those high on NFCC. Our results indicated that NFCC is inversely related to use of cognitive reappraisal. Also, low-NFCC individuals reported greater psychological and interpersonal well-being than high-NFCC individuals when adopting cognitive reappraisal, whereas the reverse was found when individuals engaged in attentional distraction. Implications and future research directions were discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:29:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R00227120-1.pdf: 552580 bytes, checksum: 1ac4305b8249b2f6306d8c6155616bfe (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1. Introduction ………………………………………………………................. 1
1.1 Cognitive Reappraisal …………………………………………………………... 2 1.2 Need for Cognitive Closure …………………………………………………… 3 1.3 The Link between Cognitive Reappraisal and Need for Cognitive Closure …................................... 5 1.4 The Present Studies …………………………………………………………..... 6 2. Study 1 …………………………………………………………….................... 8 2.1 Method …………………………………………………………………………............ 8 2.2 Results ………………………………………………………………………........... 11 2.3 Discussion ……………………………………………………………………......... 13 3. Study 2 ………………………………………………………….................... 15 3.1 Method ………………………………………………………………………............ 16 3.2 Results …………………….............................. 20 3.3 Discussion ……………………………………………………………………......... 24 4. General Discussion …………………………………………….............. 26 4.1 Implications and Contributions ……………………………………… 27 4.2 Limitations and Future Directions ……………………………… 29 5. Conclusion ……………………………………………………….................. 31 References ……………………………………………………………….................. 32 Footnotes ………………………………………………………………................... 39 Tables and Figures …………………………………………………….............. 40 Appendix A - Cognitive Reappraisal (a subscale from ERQ).63 Appendix B - The Need for Closure Scale ……………………………..... 65 Appendix C - The Scale of Psychological Well-Being ……….. 70 Appendix D - The Interpersonal Relationship Inventory... 75 Appendix E - The Satisfaction with Life Scale ……………..... 76 Appendix F - The Positive and Negative Affect Scale ………… 78 Appendix G - Emotion Regulation Instructions ……………………... 80 Appendix H - The Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale …… 81 Appendix I - Interaction Quality ……………………………………......... 82 Appendix J - Information about the Conversation Topic... 83 Appendix K - Manipulation Check Items and Demographics.. 84 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 認知重評與認知閉合需求間交互作用對心理健康的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The interaction between cognitive reappraisal and need for cognitive closure on well-being | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃揚名(Yang-Ming Huang),林以正(Yi-Cheng Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 認知重評,認知閉合需求,心理健康, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | cognitive reappraisal,need for cognitive closure (NFCC),well-being, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 84 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-07-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 539.63 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。