請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18813完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 任立中 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuo-Chang Fu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 傅國彰 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:28:03Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-14 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-07-30 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
1.李峰松(2004),高級職業學校教科書選用之研究,國立台北科技大學技術與職業教育研究所碩士學位論文。 2.經濟部統計處,2013,民國102年商業經營實況調查報告,網址:http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/ 英文部分 1.Armstrong, G., & Kotler, P. 2013. Marketing: An Introduction. 11th Ed., England: Pearson Education. 2.Bain, J. S. 1951. Relation of Profit Rate to Industrial Concentration: American manufacturing 1936-40. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65(3), 293-324. 3.Beckwith, N. E., & Lehmann, D. R. 1975. The Importance of Halo Effects in Multi-Attribute Attitude Models. Journal of Marketing Research, 12(3), 265-275. 4.Bettman, J. R., Capon, N., & Lutz, R. J. 1975. Multiattribute Measurement Models and Multiattribute Attitude Theory: A Test of Construct Validity. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(4), 1-15. 5.Black, R. D., Miniard, P. W., Engel, J. F., Pai, D. C., Norjaya, M. Y., & Wan Jooria, H. 2012. Consumer Behavior. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia. 6.Crompton, J. L. & Duray, N. A. 1985. An Investigation of the Relative Efficacy of Four Alternative Approaches to Importance- Performance Analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 13(4), 69-80. 7.Doyle, J. R., Green, R. H., Bottomley, P. A. 1997. Judging Relative Importance: Direct Rating and Point Allocation Are Not Equivalent. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 70(1), 65-72. 8.Elbeck, M., Williams, R., Peters, C. O., & Frankforter, S. 2009. What Marketing Educators Look for When Adopting a Principles of Marketing Textbook. Marketing Education Review, 19(2), 49-62. 9.Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 10.Ford, J. B., Joseph, M., & Joseph, B. 1999. Importance-performance Analysis as a Strategic Tool for Service Marketers: The Case of Service Quality Perceptions of Business Students in New Zealand and the USA. Journal of Services Marketing, 13(2), 171-186. 11.Haley, R. I. 1968. Benefit Segmentation: A Decision-oriented Research Tool. Journal of Marketing, 32(3), 30-35. 12.Hart, P. E. & Morgan, E. 1977. Market Structure and Economic Performance in the United Kingdom. Journal of Industrial Economics, 25(3), 177-193. 13.Hansen, R. A. & Deutscher, T. 1977/78. An Empirical Investigation of Attribute Importance in Retail Store Selection. Journal of Retailing, 53(4), 59-73. 14.Hawkins, D. I., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Best, R. J. 2007. Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy. 10th Ed., Boston, NY: McGraw-Hill. 15.Jaccard, J., Brinberg, D., & Ackerman, L. J. 1986. Assessing Attribute Importance: A Comparison of Six Methods. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(4), 463-468. 16.Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, Sa., & Bearden, W. O. 2005. Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of Its Antecedents and Impact on Performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24-41. 17.McGahan, A. M. & Porter, M. E. 1997. How Much Does Industry Matter, Really? Strategic Management Journal, 18(supplement), 15-30. 18.Malgwi, C. A., Howe, M. A., & Burnaby, P. A. 2005. Influences on Students' Choice of College Major. Journal of Education for Business, 80(5), 275-282. 19.Martilla, J. A. & James, J. C. 1977. Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79. 20.Nakanishi, M., & Bettman, J. R. 1974. Attitude Models Revisited: An Individual Level Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(3), 16-21. 21.Narver, J. C. & Slater, S. F. 1980. The Effect of Market Orientation on Business Performance. Journal of Marketing, 5(3), 20-35. 22.O’Connor, P. J. & Sullivan, G. L. 1995. Market Segmentation: A Comparison of Benefits/Attributes Desired and Brand Preference. Psychology & Marketing, 12(7), 613-635. 23.Plummer, J. T. 1974. The Concept and Application of Life Style Segmentation. Journal of Marketing, 38(1), 33-37. 24.Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York, NY: Free Press. 25.Punj, G., & Stewart, D. W. 1983. Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(2), 134-148. 26.Robbins, S. P. & Coulter, M. K. 2012. Management. 11th ed., England: Pearson Education Limited. 27.Rumelt, R. P. 1991. How Much Does Industry Matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12 (3), 167-185. 28.Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytical Hierarchy Process. Boston, NY: McGraw-Hill. 29.Sausen, K., Tomczak, T., & Herrmann, A. 2005. Development of a Taxonomy of Strategic Market Segmentation: A Framework for Bridging the Implementation Gap between Normative Segmentation and Business Practice. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 13(3), 151-173. 30.Sheth, J. N., & Talarzyk, W. W. 1972. Perceived Instrumentality and Value Importance as Determinants of Attitudes; Journal of Marketing Research); February 1972 Vol. 9, 4p. 31.Smith, W. R. 1956. Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies. Journal of Marketing, 21(1), 3-8. 32.Smith, J. & DeRidder, J. J. 1997. The Selection Process for Accounting Textbooks: General Criteria and Publisher Incentives - A Survey. Issues in Accounting Education, 12(2), 367-384. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18813 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究嘗試針對大專教師選用行銷教科書這個實際的消費者決策,運用行銷領域常見的方法與工具,來發掘出可以實際運用的行銷資訊。實際運用的方法/工具包括多重屬性決策模式、重要性–績效分析、以及根據屬性重要性進行集群分析所衍生的市場區隔等。
經以文獻探討和深度訪談發掘重要的教科書屬性,再以網路問卷取得291位受訪者提供的資料,並執行適當的統計分析之後,主要研究發現包括下列幾點: 1.本研究所納入的17個屬性都獲得一定程度的重視,其中最受重視的5個屬性依序為內文流暢易讀、章節架構合理、收錄台灣本土案例、附有教學研討個案、和深度與廣度的調和。 2.多重屬性模式確實可以解釋使用意願,但其解釋能力並不穩定,而且極可能受到光環效應所干擾。 3.重要性–績效分析確實可以導出應該優先改善和應該繼續維持的屬性,但競爭者品牌(教科書版本)之間可能高度雷同。 4.可根據屬性重要性導出具有統計效度的兩個市場區隔,但兩個區隔在17個屬性的重視程度上呈現相同的差異,因此區隔結果很可能只是反映了受訪者的反應風格,而不是對各屬性的實際重視程度。 上述研究發現可供業者實際應用在新教科書開發決策,而其他幾個發現則顯示有必要進行若干修正複現研究,藉以確認既有的方法/工具是否需要進一步調整。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This research tries to employ some marketing methods/tools to investigate the applicable information in a real world context, i.e. the choice of marketing textbooks in universities/colleges. The methods/tools employed in this research include the multiattribute model of decision, the importance-performance analysis (IPA), and the attribute-based, cluster-wised market segmentation.
A literature review and an in-depth interview were conducted first to explore the possible attributes of marketing textbook. Next, a web survey was conducted and 291 usable questionnaires were collected. The analytic results of these questionnaires suggest that: 1.The 17 textbook attributes in this research are perceived to be somewhat important at least. The 5 most important attributes are fluency of texts, reasonable chapters, localized cases, teaching cases, and appropriate compromise between depth and width. 2.Although the multiattribute models are successful in explaining the choice intentions, the explaining powers are unstable and possible to be contaminated by the halo effect. 3.Although the importance-performance analyses are successful in classifying the attributes into improvement and maintenance sectors, the classification results of competing brand (i.e. various textbooks) are possible to be highly similar. 4.Although the clustering procedure successfully reaches a two segments solution, the differences among the 17 attribute weights between these two segments are homogeneous. This result suggests that the segment solution is highly possible to be a reflection of response styles, instead of the perceived attribute weights. The first finding is directly applicable in textbook development decision. The other 3 findings indicate that some modified replication researches are needed to explore whether the modification of existing methods/tools are necessary or not. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:28:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-P00746016-1.pdf: 1139692 bytes, checksum: 81e36d21530d2c764f66a40e9ce6392e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書..........................................i
致 謝...................................................ii 摘 要...................................................iv THESIS ABSTRACT...........................................v 第一章 緒論...............................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機.....................................1 第二節 研究問題與目的.....................................3 第三節 研究流程...........................................5 第二章 文獻探討...........................................7 第一節 消費者購買決策.....................................7 第二節 多重屬性模式......................................10 第三節 重要性–績效分析..................................13 第四節 市場區隔..........................................16 第三章 研究設計..........................................18 第一節 分析架構..........................................18 第二節 樣本與問卷........................................20 第四章 資料分析..........................................23 第一節 屬性重要性排序....................................23 第二節 多重屬性模式......................................26 第三節 重要性–績效分析..................................29 第四節 市場區隔..........................................36 第五章 結論與建議........................................40 第一節 發現與結論........................................40 第二節 問題與建議........................................43 參考文獻.................................................46 附錄1:深度訪談逐字稿....................................50 附錄2:調查研究使用之問卷................................67 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 大專教師選用教科書考量因素之研究-以行銷管理用書為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Research on the Choice Decision of Chinese Marketing Textbooks in University/College Context | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周建亨,蔡建雄 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 多重屬性模式,光環效應,重要性-績效分析,集群分析,市場區隔, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Multiattribute Model,Halo Effect,Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA),Clustering Analysis,Market Segmentation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 69 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-07-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業管理組 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業管理組 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.11 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
