請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18723
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 葉疏 | |
dc.contributor.author | Jia-Zhen Hsieh | en |
dc.contributor.author | 謝家禎 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:21:51Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ansoff, H. I. 1957. Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5): 113-124.
Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. 1985. The Psychology of Sunk Cost-Organizational Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1): 124-140. Beeler, J. D., & Hunton, J. E. 1997. The Influence of Compensation Method and Disclosure Level on Information Search Strategy and Escalation of Commitment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10(2): 77-91. Biggadike, R. 1979. The risky business of diversification. Harvard Business Review, 57(3): 103-111. Biyalogorsky, E., Boulding, W., & Staelin, R. 2006. Stuck in the Past: Why Managers Persist with New Product Failures. Journal of Marketing, 70(2): 108-121. Bowen, M. G. 1987. The Escalation Phenomenon Reconsidered: Decision Dilemmas or Decision Errors? The Academy of Management Review, 12(1): 52-66. Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. 1997. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1): 9-30. Canals, J. 2001. How to Think about Corporate Growth?<atlfn>This paper is based on the author's book, Managing Corporate Growth, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.</atlfn>. European Management Journal, 19(6): 587-598. Chandler, Alfred Dupont. 1962. Strategy and structure : chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise: Cambridge : M.I.T. Press, 1962. Chong, V. K., & Suryawati, R. F. 2010. De-escalation Strategy: The Impact of Monitoring Control on Managers' Project Evaluation Decisions. The Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 8. Chow, C. W., Harrison, P., Lindquist, T., & Wu, A. 1997. Escalating commitment to unprofitable projects: replication and cross-cultural extension. Management Accounting Research, 8(3): 347-361. Conlon, D. E., & Garland, H. 1993. The Role of Project Completion Information in Resource Allocation Decisions. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(2): 402-413. Denison, C. A. 2009. Real Options and Escalation of Commitment: A Behavioral Analysis of Capital Investment Decisions. Accounting Review, 84(1): 133-155. Garud, R., & Ven, A. H. V. D. 1992. An Empirical Evaluation of the Internal Corporate Venturing Process. Strategic Management Journal, 13(Special Issue): 93-109. Ghosh, D. 1997. De-escalation Strategies: Some Experimental Evidence. Heath, C. 1995. Escalation and De-escalation of Commitment in Response to Sunk Costs: The Role of Budgeting in Mental Accounting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(1): 38-54. Karlsson, N., Juliusson, A., & Garling, T. 2005. A conceptualisation of task dimensions affecting escalation of commitment. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(6): 835-858. Keil, M., Depledge, G., & Rai, A. 2007. Escalation: The Role of Problem Recognition and Cognitive Bias. Decision Sciences, 38(3): 391-421. Kin Fai Ellick, W. 2005. The Role of Risk in Making Decisions under Escalation Situations. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(4): 584-607. Kirby, S. L., & Davis, M. A. 1998a. A Study of Escalating Commitment in Principal-Agent Relationships: Effects of Monitoring and Personal Responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2): 206-217. Kirby, S. L., & Davis, M. A. 1998b. A Study of Escalating Commitment in Principal-Agent Relationships: Effects of Monitoring and Personal Responsibility. [Article]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2): 206-217. McNamara, G., Moon, H., & Bromiley, P. 2002. Banking on Commitment: Intended and Unintended Consequences of an Organization's Attempt to Attenuate Escalation of Commitment. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(2): 443-452. Moon, H. 2001. The Two Faces of Conscientiousness: Duty and Achievement Striving in Escalation of Commitment Dilemmas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 533-540. Morgan, J., & Hansen, J. 2006. Escalating Commitment to Failing Financial Decisions: Why Does it Occur? Journal of Business and Leadership: Research, Practice and Teaching, 2(1): 37-45. Roberts, E. B. 1980. New ventures for corporate growth. Harvard Business Review, 58(4): 134-142. Roberts, E. B., & Berry, C. A. 1985. Entering New Business: Selecting Strategies for Success. Sloan Management Review, 26(3): 3-17. Salter, S. B., & Sharp, D. J. 2001. Agency effects and escalation of commitment: do small national culture differences matter? The International Journal of Accounting, 36(1): 33-45. Schaubroeck, J., & Williams, S. 1993. Type A Behavior Pattern and Escalating Commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5): 862-867. Simonson, I., & Staw, B. M. 1992. Deescalation Strategies: A Comparison of Techniques for Reducing Commitment to Losing Courses of Action. [Article]. Journal of Applied Psychology August, 77(4): 419-426. Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. 1995. Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(6): 1573-1592. Staw, B. M. 1976. Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1): 27-44. Staw, B. M. 1981. The Escalation of Commitment to a Course of Action. The Academy of Management Review, 6(4): 577-587. Sykes, H. B. 1986. The Anatomy of a Corporate Venturing Program: Factors Influencing Success. Journal of Business Venturing, 1: 275-293. Tan, H.-T., & Yates, J. F. 2002. Financial Budgets and Escalation Effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(2): 300-322. Tversky, A., editor, & Kahneman, D., editor. 2000. Choices, values, and frames: New York : Russell Sage FoundationCambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 2000. Weber, M., & Zuchel, H. 2005. How Do Prior Outcomes Affect Risk Attitude? Comparing Escalation of Commitment and the House-Money Effect. Decision Analysis, 2(1): 30-43. Whyte, G., Saks, A. M., & Hook, S. 1997. When Success Breeds Failure: The Role of Self-Efficacy in Escalating Commitment to a Losing Course of Action. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(5): 415-432. Wong, K. F. E., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. 2007. The Role of Anticipated Regret in Escalation of Commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2): 545-554. Wong, K. F. E., Kwong, J. Y. Y., & Ng, C. K. 2008. When Thinking Rationally Increases Biases: The Role of Rational Thinking Style in Escalation of Commitment. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(2): 246-271. Yin, R. K., 周海濤, 張蘅, & 李永賢. 2010. 個案研究 : 設計與方法 (初版 ed.): 臺北市 : 五南, 2009. 任旭林, & 王重鳴. 2006. 基于創業的承諾升級研究. 人類工效學(02): 10-12. 吳思華. 1996. 策略九說 : 策略思考的本質. 臺北市: 城邦文化發行. 李佳純. 2001. 以資源基礎理論探討持久競爭優勢形成之因素—以“ePaper電子報聯盟”為例. 傳播與管理研究, 1(1): 93-120. 李銳, 李愛梅, & 凌文輇. 2008. 承諾續擴現象及其心理機制. 心理科學進展(05): 767-778. 林舒柔, & 湯明哲. 2007. 企業創業投資中的承諾續擴:認知偏誤觀點. 臺大管理論叢, 18(1): 55-79. 洪世章, & 蔡碧鳳. 2006. 企業興業與成長:比較個案研究. 中山管理評論, 14(1): 79-117. 湯明哲. 2012. 策略精論. 基礎篇: 臺北市 : 旗標, 2012.03. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18723 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 對台灣企業而言,不論傳統或電子產業,皆面臨新興市場的成本競爭,以及歐美企業技術、營運模式典範移轉的挑戰,使得營收及獲利能力面臨衰退壓力。固然從現有基礎追求有機成長,是最普遍的因應方法;但產業變動快速,往往讓企業未能及時跨越轉型鴻溝。
多角化轉投資提供企業成長、多元化、分散風險的機會,但也面臨極大挑戰:企業既有的資源、經驗,通常不能完全適用於多角化項目。如何建構合理的投資架構、審核機制以提高決策品質,是多角化轉投資的重要課題。 本研究透過某企業多角化興業過程,輔以同時亦投入相同內容的對照公司,從經理人、組織流程、資源取用、產業環境…等四個面向整理出多角化轉投資的決策脈絡,以及興業模式對決策的影響因素。 最後提出多角化轉投資決策模型,說明企業興業流程,並建議以「CV + VC」的方式,既給予多角化事業足夠的資源佈局,又能發揮績效審核功能,避免過度承諾續擴虛耗企業資源。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | For most of Taiwan companies, either traditional or Hi-tech sectors, are facing the two-end challenges: the cost down pressure from the rivls in emerging companies, and the innovation and business model shift from the competitors in the US and Europe. Revenue and profit are saturated and probably decreased for Taiwan companies. It is natural for companies to adapt “organic growth” policy. However, organic growth takes time, and can’t catch up with the rapidly changing world. This has made lots of the companies not able to “cross the chasm.”
Diversificaition provides the companies with the opportunities to grow, to diversify and to minimize the risks. However, it brings challenges as well. Few of the existing experiences and resources can be leveraged to the diversified investment. The companies have to find out the way to build up the investment structure, performance evaluation mechanism to improve the decision-making. In this thesis, we observe the decision process in the diversification of a company, as well as that of its rival at the same time. We conclude the decision-making tendancy from the aspects of managers, organization process flow, resource allocation and industry environment. Also we infer the impact to decision-making resulting from the type of venture business. In this study, we declare a decision-making model of diversification and suggest a “CV + VC” model for diversification business. With this model, the company can ensure the new businss to have enough resources as well as to be screened by effective performance-review to prevent the company from escalating commitment. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:21:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-P99744006-1.pdf: 2674917 bytes, checksum: 4fd1cb8b83c21051dc5f1454e6832ae5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 1 第三節 研究範圍 4 第四節 研究目的 6 第五節 研究方法及流程 7 第二章 文獻探討 10 第一節 成長策略與多角化 10 第二節 多角化的投資策略以及企業內部興業 14 第三節 承諾續擴 20 第四節 本章小結 27 第三章 企業興業個案分析 30 第一節 背景介紹 30 第二節 以MEMS矽基板封裝切入LED 33 第三節 LED磊晶佈局 40 第四節 在大陸的量產規劃 49 第五節 Si-LED及磊晶策略的結果 57 第六節 對照個案--E科技 60 第七節 本章小結 66 第四章 個案整理與比較 68 第一節 個案觀察整理 68 第二節 W公司及E科技的比較 76 第三節 個案觀察及訪談結論 80 第四節 承諾續擴 88 第五章 結論與後續研究 94 第一節 結論 94 第二節 後續研究 101 參考文獻 103 附 錄 107 A. W公司大事記 107 B. 微機電 109 C LED的技術與專利 110 D LED磊晶廠的資本支出特性及產業變化 115 E. 訪談記錄 122 圖目錄 圖 一 1 安索夫矩陣 4 圖 一 2 研究流程圖 9 圖 二 1 企業內部興業過程 10 圖 二 2 企業成長動力 12 圖 二 3 以產品、市場為基礎的多角化進入策略 13 圖 二 4 Spectrum of venture strategies 14 圖 二 5 根據熟悉度的進入程序 –1 16 圖 二 6 根據熟悉度的進入程序-2 17 圖 二 7 企業興業過程 18 圖 二 8 機會辨識、資源取用、資產累積之演化關圖示 19 圖 三 1 LED應用領域的發展狀況 34 圖 三 2 LED新加入者的進入策略 35 圖 三 3 Si-LED專利示意圖 36 圖 三 4 Si-LED的封裝方式可節省面積 37 圖 三 5 LED晶片尺寸與價格關係圖 38 圖 三 6 Si-LED封裝的進入策略 39 圖 三 7 W公司進入LED晶片產業的策略 41 圖 三 8 Si-LED在現有供應鏈中加入新的環節 43 圖 三 9 策略併購或合作對象的價值 46 圖 三 10 併購目的 47 圖 三 11 兩家公司的資源 48 圖 三 12 W公司LED量產SWOT在時間軸的布局 53 圖 三 13 從附加價值、製造或產品導向來看策略定位 56 圖 三 14 W公司LED的策略定位 58 圖 三 15 全球LED需求佔比 63 圖 三 16 2005~2009年LED應用市場CAGR 63 圖 三 17 W、E公司的策略及目標市場 67 圖 五 1 多角化興業決策流程圖 94 圖 五 2 多角化興業決策與四個面向的關係 95 圖 五 3 CV多角化興業Spin-off的時機 99 圖 附錄 1 LED的光電效應及磊晶片的發光示意圖 110 圖 附錄 2 MOCVD的製程示意圖 111 圖 附錄 3 藍/白光LED專利授權關係圖 113 圖 附錄 4 LED產業結構的改變 116 圖 附錄 5 LED產業鏈上下游投資指標的相對關係 118 圖 附錄 6 CMOS、LED與LCD技術改進與產能增加的關係 120 表目錄 表 二—1 承諾續擴的成因 21 表 二—2 承諾續擴的影響因素 22 表 二—3 非相關多角化興業及新創公司之內外部資源比較 28 表 三—1 2000年以前W公司的興業軌跡 30 表 三—2 2000年以後的興業軌跡 31 表 三—3 Si-LED封裝的SWOT策略分析 39 表 三—4 W公司進入LED晶片產業的SWOT分析 41 表 三—5 W公司LED晶片在中國量產的SWOT分析 50 表 三—6 驗證廠與量產廠從規劃到執行的差距 55 表 三—7 E科技初次募款BP及實際達成情形 65 表 四—1 兩家公司的觀察整理 76 表 四—2 個案公司結構比較 79 表 四—3 興業組織型態對續擴的影響 90 表 五—1 興業單位 Spin-off的時機 100 表 附錄—1 LED產業鏈的變化 115 表 附錄—2 LED產業鏈的投資指標 119 表 附錄—3 LED、CMOS與LCD產業技術與產能的關係 120 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 興業模式對企業多角化轉投資決策的影響
—以個案觀察為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Impact of Investment Structure
to the Decision-making Process of Diversification – a Case Study | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪茂蔚,王瑄 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 多角化,轉投資,企業興業 (CV),創業投資 (VC),承諾續擴, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | diversification,Corporate Venture (CV),Venture Capital (VC),escalating commitment, | en |
dc.relation.page | 138 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-07 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計與管理決策組 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計與管理決策組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.61 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。