請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18543完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 狄萊(Patrick DeJarnette) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Po-Cheng Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃柏澄 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:10:49Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Akerlof,G.A.(1982). Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. The quarterly journal of economics, 97(4),543-569. Bellemare,C., Shearer,B.(2009).Gift giving and worker productivity: Evidence from a firm-level experiment. Games and Economic Behavior, 67(1), 233-244. Dufwenberg, M., Kirchsteiger, G. (2004). A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games and economic behavior, 47(2), 268-298. Falk, A., Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and economic behavior, 54(2), 293-315. Gilchrist, D. S., Luca, M., Malhotra, D. (2016). When 3+ 1> 4: Gift structure and reciprocity in the field. Management Science, 62(9), 2639-2650. Goldin, C. (2014). A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review, 104(4), 1091-1119. Kosfeld, M., Neckermann, S. (2011). Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(3), 86-99. Kube, S., Maréchal, M. A., Puppe, C. (2012). The currency of reciprocity: Gift exchange in the workplace. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1644-62. List, J. A., Sadoff, S., Wagner, M. (2011). So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 439. Mas, A., Pallais, A. (2017). Valuing alternative work arrangements. American Economic Review, 107(12), 3722-59. Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American economic review, 1281-1302. Wiswall, M., Zafar, B. (2018). Preference for the workplace, investment in human capital, and gender. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(1), 457-507. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18543 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文嘗試解答互信與工時自由如何在工作場域影響互惠效果。我們選擇Upwork網站進行線上現場實驗,我們雇用網站上的自由工作者並觀察他們在給定額外時間獎勵或工資獎勵時的工作努力程度。本實驗請工作者做一個三小時的資料輸入工作並以總輸入字數及正確輸入字數作為產出的指標。過去文獻指出雇員會藉由提升工作表現來回饋雇主的善意。我們的第一個結果顯示雇員收到工資獎勵時較願意開始這三個小時的工作,然而,當考量總輸入字數時,我們並沒有發現存在互惠效果;且當考量正確輸入字數時,獲得每小時0.5美元獎勵的實驗組存在負向的互惠效果。此外,我們加入了一組可以自由選擇要接受工資獎勵或是額外時間獎勵的實驗組,但是這個實驗組同樣不論在總輸入字數或是正確輸入字數上都沒有發現互惠效果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | We seek to answer how trust and time flexibility influence reciprocity in the workplace. We run an online field experiment on Upwork to hire workers and observe their work effort when given additional time flexibility and wages. We ask the workers to do a 3-hour data-entry task, and measure the output by both the number of characters entered and the correct entering characters. The existing literature shown that workers reciprocate to the kindness of the employer by providing better work performance. Our first result finds that the worker who receives a money bonus is more willing to start the 3-hour task after receiving the treatment. However, we find no significant reciprocity when measuring the output by the total number of characters; while there exists negative reciprocity on correctly entered characters for those who receive a $0.5 per hour wage bonus. Additionally, we add a treatment to choose between wage increase and additional time flexibility, but this treatment again finds null results on either total characters or correct entering characters. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:10:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1208202010535800.pdf: 2075368 bytes, checksum: d78f08e0ccb19304cfa4a16252b38f53 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Literature Review 5 Chapter 3: Experimental Design 8 3.1 Reason for choosing Upwork and the task . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2 Structure of the experimental design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3 Hiring timeline on Upwork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.4 Sample pool and sample size in each treatment . . . . . . . . . . 12 Chapter 4: Results 15 4.1 Quantity: total characters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.2 Quality: Levenshtein distance from the correct answers . . . . . 20 4.3 Responding timing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusion 27 References 29 A Appendix 31 A.1 Wording in the experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 A.2 Interfaces of Upwork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 A.3 Regression results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 A.4 Pilot results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 工作自由度的互惠效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Reciprocity of Working Flexibility | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 吳亨德(Hendrik Rommeswinkel) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王道一(Joseph Tao-yi Wang),江淳芳(Chun-Fang Chiang),陳儀(Josie I Chen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 互惠效果,禮物交換,線上現場實驗,時間自由度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Reciprocity,Gift Exchange,Online Field Experiment,Time Flexibility, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 46 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003056 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1208202010535800.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.03 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
