請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18492完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林逸彬(Yi-Pin Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wen-Hsiang Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王溫翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:08:01Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-09-05 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Aljundi, I.H., 2011, “Effect of Dry Hydrcarbons and Critical Point Temperature on the Efficiencies of Organic Rankine Cycle,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 36, pp. 1196-1202.
2. Akhtari, S. 2012, Economic assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chain for heat generation in a district heating system, University of British Columbia. 3. Andersen, F.E., Diaz, M.S. & Grossmann, I.E. 2013, 'Multiscale strategic planning model for the design of integrated ethanol and gasoline supply chain', AICHE Journal, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 4655-4672. 4. Arghode VK, Gupta AK. Development of high intensity CDC combustion for gas turbine engines. Appl Energy 2011;88:963–73. 5. Battery & Fuel Cell Materials to 2013, The Freedonia Group, Inc., 2009. 6. Blengini GA, Carlo TD. The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings. Energy and Buildings 2010;42 (6):869e80. 7. Bieda, B., 2012a. Life cycle inventory processes of the Mittal Steel Poland (MSP) S.A. in Krakow Poland e blast furnace pig iron production e a case study. Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 17, 787e794. 8. Bergman, R. B., and S. A. Bowe. 2009. Life-Cycle Inventory of Softwood Lumber Manufacturing in the Northeastern and North Central United States. CORRIM Phase II Final Report:Module D. http://www.corrim.org/pubs/reports/2010/phase2/Module_D.pdf. (14 Dec. 2010). 9. Boretti. Recovery of exhaust and coolant heat with R245fa Organic Rankine Cycles in a hybrid passenger car with a naturally aspirated gasoline engine. 10. Branchini L, De Pascale A, Peretto A. Thermodynamic analysis and comparison of different Organic Rankine Cycle configurations. In: Proceedings of ICAE. China: Suzhou; 2012.Appl Therm Eng 2012;36(1):73–7. 11. Bradley, D. 2006. GHG impacts of pellet production from woody biomass sources in BC, Canada. http://www.climatechangesolutions.net/. Accessed July 17, 2012. 12. Beekes, M. 2014, 'Advantages and drawbacks for international trade of torrefied products', 4th Central European Biomass Conference, January 2014. 13. Cho E-S, Chung SH. Improvement of flame stability and NOx reduction in hydrogen-added ultra lean premixed combustion. J Mech Sci Technol 2009;23:650–8. 14. CISRI. Residual heat and energy in iron and steel industry and the recovery technology. In: International energy efficiency EM&V seminar. China Iron and Steel Research Institute; 2010. 15. Caneghem JV, Block C, Cramm P, Mortier R, Vandecasteele C. Improving eco efficiency in the steel industry: the ArcelorMittal Gent case. Journal of Cleaner Production 2010;18(8):807e14. 16. David G, Michel F, Sanchez L. Waste heat recovery projects using Organic Rankine Cycle technology – examples of biogas engines and steel mills applications, World Engineers’ Convention, Geneva 4–9; September 2011. 17. Danish Technological Institute, IDEA Consult and Ecorys Research and Consulting, Competitiveness of energy-intensive industries under the European Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) – Orientation study for the SILC Initiative; 2011. 18. European Commission - Joint Research Centre – Institute for Environment and Sustainability: International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - Review schemes for Life Cycle Assessment. First edition March 2010. EUR 24710 pean Union; 2010. 19. Eason, T.; Garmestani, A. Cross-scale dynamics of a regional urban system through time. Region Devel. 2012, 36, 55–77. 20. “ECOWAS Energy Ministers Adopt Regional Policies on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency,” ECREEE Newsletter, Vol. 6 (March 2013). 21. Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guine J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, et al. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 2009;91:1e21. 22. FPInnovations. 2011. Product category rules (PCR) for preparing an environmental product declaration (EPD) for North American structural and architectural wood products. Version1.http://www.forintek.ca/public/pdf/Public_Information/EPD%20Program/PCR%20November%208%202011%20Final.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2012. 23. Gerdau Ameristeel. Steel production process; 2009. Retrieved October 3rd, 2009 from http://www.gerdau.com/produtos-e-servicos/PRODUTOS SERVICOS IMAGEM/18.file.axd. 24. Grillo Reno, M.L., Silva Lora, E.E., Escobar Palacio, J.C., Venturini, O.J., Buchgeister, J., Almazan, O., 2011. A LCA (life cycle assessment) of the methanol production from sugarcane bagasse. Energy 36 (6), 3716e3726. 25. Garrett, P., & Rende, K. (2012). Life cycle assessment of wind power: comprehensive results from a state‐of‐art approach. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, on progress. doi: 10.1007/S11367‐012‐0445‐4. 26. Gonzalez-Mejia, A.M.; Eason, T.N.; Cabezas, H.; Suidan, M.T. Assessing Sustainability in Real Urban Systems: The Greater Cincinnati Metropolitan Area in Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2012, 46, 9620–9629. 27. “High-Cycle Regenerative Combustion System,” Technical Note No.0707, Nippon Furnace Kogyo K.K. (NFK), Yokohama, Japan, July, 1983. 28. Hasegawa, T. and Tanaka R., High Temperature Air Combustion –Revolution in Combustion Technology- (Part I: New Findings on High Temperature Air Combustion), JSME International Journal, Series B, Vol. 41, No.4, 1998, pp. 1079 - 1084. 29. International Standard , 2006, ISO 14040 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework, ISO 2006. 30. Iron and Steel Institute of Thailand (ISIT). Statistical yearbook 2009. Bangkok: ISIT; 2009. 31. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Contribution of Working Group I tothe Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/contents.html. (29 Dec. 2010). 32. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2013), Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013, OECD/IEA, Paris. 33. Jungbluth N., Chudacoff M., Dauriat A., Dinkel F., Doka G., Faist Emmenegger M., Gnansounou E., Kljun N.,Spielmann M., Stettler C. and Sutter J. (2007) Life Cycle Inventories of Bioenergy. Final report ecoinvent data v2.0 No.17. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf, CH. 34. K.W. Ng, L. Giroux, J.A. MacPhee and T. Todoschuk, ‘CO2 Mitigation by Incorporation of Charcoal into Coking Coal Blends’, International Conference on Coal Science and Technology, Oct 26-29, 2009, Cape Town, South Africa. 35. Kajikawa T et al. Development for Advanced Thermoelectric Conversion Systems. The 26th Int. Conf. on Thermoelectrics, p.230, 2007. 36.Lin,B.,Wu,Y.,Zhang,L.,2011.Estimatesofthepotentialforenergyconservation in the Chinese steel industry.EnergyPolicy39,3680–3689. 37. Li, H., Liu, X., Legros, R., Bi, X.T., Jim Lim, C. & Sokhansanj, S. 2012, 'Pelletization of torrefied sawdust and properties of torrefied pellets', Applied Energy, vol. 93, no. 0, pp. 680-685. 38. Liu JP, Fu JQ, Ren CQ, Wang LJ, Xu ZX, Deng BL. Comparison and analysis of engine exhaust gas energy recovery potential through various bottom cycles. Appl Therm Eng 2013;50(1):1219–34. 39. MORAS, S. (2008). 'Environmental assessment of energy production by combustion of biogas provided by the anaerobic digestion of agricultural biomass.' Int. J. Environmental Technology and Management 9(4): 413-424. 40. Mansoornejad, B., Chambost, V. & Stuart, P. 2010, 'Integrating product portfolio design and supply chain design for the forest biorefinery', Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1497-1506. 41. McKenna, R.C., Norman, J.B., 2010. Spatial modelling of industrial heat loads and recovery potentials in the UK. Energy Policy. 38(10), 5878-5891. 42. Mizsey, P. & Racz, L. 2010, 'Cleaner production alternatives: Biomass utilization options', Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 767-770. 43. Muller, N.Z.; Mendelsohn, R.; Nordhaus, W. Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy. Amer. Econ. Rev. 2011, 101, 1649–1675. 44. Mobini, M., Sowlati, T. & Sokhansanj, S. 2013, 'A simulation model for the design and analysis of wood pellet supply chains', Applied Energy, vol. 111, no. 0, pp. 1239 - 1249. 45. Nyboer J. A review of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the Canadian wood product industry:1990 to 2005. Vancouver, BC: Canadian Industrial Energy End-use Data and Analysis Centre, Simon Fraser University; March 2007. 46. NREL, DOE & EPA. 2010. Supporting Life Cycle Inventory Data Development in the United States. NREL, DOE & EPA Workshop; 2010 Mar 2-4; Crystal City (VA) (unpublished). 47. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). 2010. U.S. Life-Cycle Inventory Database. http://www.nrel.gov/lci/database/. (10 Dec. 2010). 48. Nguyen, T.L.T., Hermansen, J.E. & Nielsen, R.G. 2013, 'Environmental assessment of gasification technology for biomass conversion to energy in comparison with other alternatives: the case of wheat straw', Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 53, no.0, pp. 138-148. 49. O&GJ (Oil and Gas Journal) (2012), “Worldwide Look at Reserves and Production”, Oil and Gas Journal, Pennwell Corporation, Oklahoma City, United States. 50. Ohman, H.(2012). Implementation and evaluation of low temperature waste heat recovery power cycle using NH3 in an organic Rankine cycle. Energy: doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.074. 51. Park, H.S., Rene, E.R., Choi, S.M., Chiu, A.S.F., 2008. Strategies for sustainable development of industrial park in Ulsan, South Korea e from spontaneous evolution to systematic expansion of industrial symbiosis. J. Environ. Manag. 87, 1e13. 52. Papadopoulos, A.I., Stijepovic, M. & Linke, P., 2010, “On the Systematic Design and Selection of Optimal Working Fluids for Organic Rankine Cycles,” Applied Thermal Engineering , Vol. 30, pp. 760-769. 53. Palestra N. Applicazione di Cicli ORC a Recuperi Termici da Processi Industriali (Italian). Vescovo: Turboden press; 2010. 54. Pelletier, N., Pirog, R., Rasmussen, R., 2010. Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States. Agricultural Systems 103 (6), 380e389. 55. Panepinto, D. & Genon, G. 2012, 'Biomass Thermal Treatment: Energy Recovery,Environmental Compatibility and Determination of External Costs', Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 197-206. 56. Pirraglia, A., R. Gonzalez, and D. Saloni. 2010. Wood Pellets: An Expanding Market Opportunity. Biomass Magazine. http://www.biomassmagazine.com/articles/3853/woodpellets-an-expanding-market-opportunity. (14 Dec. 2010). 57. Pellet Fuels Institute (PFI). 2011. PFI standards. http://pelletheat.org/ pfi-standards/. Accessed August 22, 2012. 58. Pirraglia, A., Gonzalez, R., Denig, J. & Saloni, D. 2013a, 'Technical and Economic Modeling for the Production of Torrefied Lignocellulosic Biomass for the U.S. Densified Fuel Industry', Bioenergy Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 263-275. 59. Rowe DM. Review Thermalelctric Waste Heat Recovery as a Renewable Energy Source. Int. J. of Innovations in Energy Systems and Power. 2006;1:13. 60. ReCiPe 2008 (2009). First edition. Amersfoort: PRe Consultants; University of Leiden: CML; Radboud University Nijmegen: RUN; Bilthoven: RIVM. 61. Rossetti N. Studio delle potenzialita del recupero calore in aziende altamente energivore finalizzato alla valorizzazione elettrica mediante tecnologia ORC (Italian). University of Brescia; 2010. 62. Roy, J.P., Mishra, M.K., & Misra, A., 2010,“Parametric Optimization and Performance Analysis of a Waste Heat Recovery System Using Organic Rankine Cycle. Energy, Vol. 35, pp. 5049-5062. 63. Romanelli T L and Milan M (2010), Energy performance of a production system of eucalyptus. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental v.14, n.8, p.896–903, 2010. 64. Rubio Rodriguez, M.A., De Ruyck, J., Diaz, P.R., Verma, V.K., Bram, S., 2011. An LCA based indicator for evaluation of alternative energy routes. Applied Energy 88 (3), 630e635. 65. Roy, J. P., Mstra, A.(2012). Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a regenerative Organic Rankine cycle using R‐123 for waste heat recovery. Energy 39(1), 227 – 235. 66. Stahl, M. (2008). Improving Wood Fuel Pellets for Household Use - Perspectives on Quality, Efficiency and Environment. Faculty of Technology and Science, Environmental and Energy Systems. Karlstad, Karlstad University. 67. Szego GG, Dally BB, Nathan GJ. Operational characteristics of parallel jet MILD combustion burner system. Combust Flame 2009;156:429–38. 68. Spatari, S., Bagley, D. M., & MacLean, H. L. (2010). Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies. Bioresource Technology, 101(2), 654-667. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.067. 69. Schmidt J H (2010), Comparative life cycle assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15:183‐197 <DOI: 10.1007/s11367‐009‐0142> 70. Shengjun, Z., Huaixin, W.G., 2011, “Performance Comparison and Parametric Optimization of Transcritical Power Cycle system for Low- Temperature Geothermal Power Generation,”Applied Energy, Vol. 88, pp. 2740-2754. 71. Subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and Tanaka, R., “Innovation of Combustion and Heat Transfer Technology toward 21st century,”Technical Journal ‘Machinery Promotion’, vol.27.No.1 written in Japanese, 1994. 72. SimaPro 8.0.3(2014). PRe Consultants. 73. Toffoletto, L., Bulle, C., Godin, J., Reid, C., Deschenes, L., 2007. LUCAS e a new LCIA method used for a Canadian-specific context. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12 (2), 93e102. 74. Tissari, J., Lyyranen, J., Hytonen, K., Sippula, O., Tapper, U., Frey, A., Saarnio, K., Pennanen, A. S., Hillamo, R., Salonen, R. O., Hirvonen, M. -., & Jokiniemi, J. (2008). Fine particle and gaseous emissions from normal and smouldering wood combustion in a conventional masonry heater. Atmospheric Environment, 42(34), 7862-7873. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.019. 75. Tchanche, B.F., Papadakis, G., Lambrinos, G., & Frangoudakis, A., 2009, “Fluid Selection for a Low-Temperature Solar Organic Rankine Cycle,” Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 29, pp. 2468-2476. 76. US-EPA. Guidlines for Preparing Economic Analysis. Available online: http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwAN/EE-0568-50.pdf/$file/EE-0568-50.pdf (accessed on 4 February 2013) 77. Varun, Bhat, I. K., and Prakash, R.(2008). Life Cycle Analysis of Run‐of River Small Hydro Power Plants in India. The Open Renewable Energy, 1, 11‐16. 78. Viral P. Shah, David Col Debella, Robert J. Ries, 2008. Life cycle assessment of residential heating and cooling systems in four regions in the United States. Energy and Buildings, 40, P.503–513 79. Valderrama, C., Granados, R., Luis Cortina, J., Gasol, C.M., Guillem, M., Josa, A., 2012. Implementation of best available techniques in cement manufacturing: a lifecycle assessment study. Journal of Cleaner Production 25, 60e67. 80. Worrell E, Price L, Neelis M, Galitsky C, Zhou N. World best practice energy intensity values for selected industrial sectors, 2007. Berkeley, CA:Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 81. World Steel Association, 2007. Steel Statistical Year Book 2007. 82. Worldsteel Committee on Economic Studies, ‘Steel Statistic Yearbook 2011’, worldsteel Association, Brussels, 2011. 83. Zhang J, Wang G. Energy saving technologies and productive efficiency in the Chinese iron and steel sector. Energy 2008;33:525–37. 84. 蔡喬方，(2007)。加熱爐，第3 版，冶金工業出版社。 85. 福島康裕，(2007)。亞洲國家內廢鋼和原鋼的物流流向之整合管理策略，國家科學委員會研究報告。 86. 2008年鋼鐵年鑑，(2009)。金屬工業研究發展中心，經濟部技術處。 87. 工業技術研究院綠能與環境所，(2008)。廢熱回收節能管理手冊。 88. 陳起鳳、柳中明，(2008)。「氣候變遷調適情境分析與應用」，Global Change and Sustainable Development，第2 卷第2 期，頁34-50。 89. 陳彥尹、吳榮華、黃韻勳，(2008)，「台灣耗能產業二氧化碳排放驅動力之研究」，礦冶，第52 卷，第3 期，頁40-52。 90. 吳兆衡，(2009)。以物質流分析結合系統動態探討台灣鋼鐵業二氧化碳排放，國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文。 91. 傅思婷，(2009)。台灣鋼鐵工業發展政策分析，國立成功大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文。 92. 詹益亮，(2010)。工業節能技術與案例介紹。 93. 黃彰斌、葛復光、鄭柏彥，(2010)。「低碳核能於國家能源規劃與減量策略之角色」，中華民國能源經濟學會99 年度論文。 94. 李昆洲，(2010)。生質物供應後勤之成本與碳排放分析，國立台灣大學環境工程研究所碩士論文。 95. 廖卿惠，(2010)。臺灣永續能源發展之潛勢分析，國立台灣大學環境工程研究所博士論文。 96. 李毓仁，郭吟翎，徐菘蔚，(2011)。低階熱能發電的有機朗肯循環組開發與測試，機械工業雜誌343，138 -148。 97. 林法勤，(2011)。農林廢棄物焙燒技術，生質廢棄物轉製再生燃料技術研討會，台北市。 98. 王寧沂，(2012)。下水污泥碳化之生命週期評估，國立台灣大學環境工程研究所碩士論文。 99. 郭啟榮，(2013)。中低溫工業廢熱有機朗肯循環發電與其經濟效益，臺灣能源期刊第一卷，第一期，頁71-84。 100. 102年度鋼鐵業原物料耗用通常水準，(2013)。財政部臺北國稅局。 101. 林裕仁、潘薇如，(2014)。國際木質顆粒發展現況，林業論壇。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18492 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 台灣為海島型國家，能資源相當匱乏。依經濟部能源局截至2014年1月底數據資料，若未將核能列為自產能源，進口能源佔總能源供給比例高達98.2 %。再將能源消費依部門別區分歸納，能源需求結構以工業部門為大宗，接近40 %。其中，工業部門以石化、鋼鐵、水泥等為主要的高耗能產業。
因此，須提出妥適的多種政策和措施，以『減緩(mitigation)』或『調適（adaptation）』的方式來正視工業部門對環境面造成之重大衝擊。根據國際能源總署之2013年能源技術展望報告提出，為達成2050年全球升溫控制在2 oC範圍內之目標，關鍵技術與策略主要包括：『提升能源效率』、『發展再生能源』。 據此，本研究以高污染、高耗能的鋼鐵產業為例，並選擇國內北部某電弧爐煉鋼廠做為案例研究，實際參訪案廠，參考電弧爐煉鋼之最佳可行技術(BAT)，根據現況擬定各項可行之改善技術，將3項溫室氣體減量技術納入於加熱爐製程設備，分別為以木質顆粒之再生能源，替代加熱爐現有的重油化石燃料；應用有機朗肯循環機組以有效利用加熱爐所產生的廢熱，藉此回收發電；透過蓄熱式燃燒系統之蜂巢式陶瓷蓄熱體，提高加熱爐內燃燒空氣的預熱溫度，達到熱交換效率的提升等技術。以『提升能源效率』、『發展再生能源』之概念為導向，進行鋼鐵業節能技術，以期研究案例透過生質燃料的替代以及能源效率的提昇，而同時減少能耗與經濟成本，降低環境衝擊。 本研究功能單位設定為每生產1(ton)的鋼鐵產品作為評估結果之比較基準。在生命週期資料盤查部分，透過製作問卷方式實際訪查，並引用Ecoinvent 3.0資料庫、蒐研相關文獻之最佳化參數、條件等資料數據，將案例現況以及各項技術彙整成完整的生命週期盤查數據清單，以SimaPro 8.0.3軟體，選用ILCD 2011衝擊導向模式、ReCiPe損害導向模式，進行生命週期評估，在最後的結果與討論，藉由ILCD 2011衝擊導向、ReCiPe損害導向之生命週期評估、溫室氣體減量成效、益本比以及假想之碳額度收益，整體檢視各項溫室氣體減量技術，評估產生的環境、經濟效益。 在環境面，以木質顆粒之生質顆粒替代燃料技術最佳，由ILCD 2011衝擊導向、ReCiPe損害導向之評估結果顯示，於11項環境衝擊類別皆超過90 %的減緩比率，其整體損害影響指數減少(17.163 Pt)，損害減緩比率為(83.770 %)，對環境之衝擊、損害有高度的減緩效益，溫室氣體總計將可減少66,173 (ton/yr)；而若從成本效益層面考量，則以蓄熱式燃燒系統設備之熱交換效率提升技術為最佳，益本比達5.262。 此外，由於生質顆粒替代燃料技術與熱交換效率提升技術2者並無存在互斥影響，在予以整合達到系統最適化後，相較於案例整體現況，整體損害影響指數減少(11.271 Pt)，損害減緩比率為(5.035 %)。預期溫室氣體將可減少66,243 (ton/yr)，約降低13.982 %的溫室氣體排放量。益本比為1.494，另可額外創造11,844,248 (NT$/yr)之碳額度收入。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | After the Industrial Revolution , people improved living style but also overused the natural resources. Taiwan is island country and very short of natural resources.
According to the report of MOEA (2014 january) , the imported energy was 98% of the total energy. The petrifaction , steel and cement were the high energy cost of industry department , which used the 40% energy of total in Taiwan. Therefore , the mitigation and adaptation were provided to response the major impact of industry department. There was an irreversible disaster of environment pollution after overusing the energy and natural resources. In order to achieve the goal of globe temperature control. International Energy Agency indicated the key technology and policy including the energy efficiency improvement and development of renewable energy. In this research , the steel industry was as the sample in discussion and exemplified by the case study of electric arc furnace. The concept of energy efficiency improvement and development of renewable energy was used to improve the energy efficiency and decreasing cost and the impact of environment. There were three technologies in this study. Firstly , the wood pellet was using to replace the heavy fuel oil as renewable energy. Secondly , using the ORC instrument to recycle the waste heat and generated the electric power. Thirdly , using the High-cycle Regenerative Combustion System to improve the technology of heat exchange efficiency. The SimaPro 8.0.3 was using in this study to provide the life cycle assessment and the environment impact of this case study. Results also proved the optimized recommendation of this case study. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:08:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01541211-1.pdf: 14953928 bytes, checksum: 7dc466e59e7387e9974f49c15baf14f4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I
摘要 II Abstract IV 目錄 V 圖目錄 VIII 表目錄 XI Oral Defense Comments XIII 第一章 緒論 1-1 1-1 研究緣起 1-1 1-2 研究目標 1-4 第二章 文獻回顧 2-1 2-1 木質顆粒 2-1 2-1-1 緣起簡介 2-1 2-1-2 製程與成品規範 2-1 2-1-3 燃料應用 2-4 2-1-4 優點與效益 2-5 2-1-5 國內概況 2-9 2-2 有機朗肯循環 2-10 2-2-1 技術原理 2-10 2-2-2 應用領域 2-11 2-2-3 經濟效益 2-12 2-2-4 環境效益 2-14 2-2-5 國內概況 2-16 2-3 蓄熱式燃燒系統 2-17 2-3-1 技術原理 2-17 2-3-2 應用領域 2-18 2-3-3 經濟效益 2-20 2-3-4 環境效益 2-21 2-3-5 國內概況 2-22 2-4 生命週期評估 2-23 2-4-1 發展與定義 2-23 2-4-2 架構與內容 2-23 2-4-3 軟體應用 2-26 2-4-4 衝擊評估模式 2-29 第三章 研究方法 3-1 3-1 研究架構 3-1 3-2 研究案例 3-1 3-2-1 廠區平面配置 3-2 3-2-2 製程與設備 3-3 3-2-3 現況分析 3-6 3-3 技術建立 3-10 3-3-1 木質顆粒 3-10 3-3-2 有機朗肯循環 3-12 3-3-3 蓄熱式燃燒技術 3-13 3-4 生命週期評估 3-14 3-4-1 目標與範疇界定 3-14 3-4-2 盤查分析 3-18 3-4-3 衝擊評估模式 3-19 第四章 結果與討論 4-1 4-1 現況分析 4-1 4-1-1 生命週期盤查分析 4-1 4-1-2 生命週期衝擊評估 4-5 4-2 生質顆粒替代燃料技術評估 4-28 4-2-1 生命週期盤查分析 4-28 4-2-2 生命週期衝擊評估 4-35 4-2-3 溫室氣體減量 4-43 4-2-4 成本效益評估 4-44 4-3 廢熱回收發電技術評估 4-46 4-3-1 生命週期盤查分析 4-46 4-3-2 生命週期衝擊評估 4-48 4-3-3 溫室氣體減量 4-56 4-3-4 成本效益評估 4-58 4-4 熱交換效率提升技術評估 4-60 4-4-1 生命週期盤查分析 4-60 4-4-2 生命週期衝擊向評估 4-62 4-4-3 溫室氣體減量 4-72 4-4-4 成本效益評估 4-73 4-5 技術綜合評估 4-75 4-5-1 技術整合 4-75 4-5-2 系統最適化 4-80 第五章 結論與建議 5-1 5-1 結論 5-1 5-2 建議 5-3 第六章 參考文獻 6-1 附 錄 A-1 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 應用溫室氣體減量技術於電弧爐煉鋼廠之生命週期評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Life Cycle Assessment on Application of Greenhouse gas mitigation technologies in Electric Arc Furnace Steel Industry | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 蔣本基(Pen-Chi Chiang) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 顧洋(Young Ku),張怡怡(E.E.Chang),陳奕宏(Yi-Hung Chen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 電弧爐煉鋼廠,溫室氣體減量,木質顆粒,有機朗肯循環,蓄熱式燃燒技術,生命週期評估,SimaPro 8.0.3, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Electric Arc Furnace,Greenhouse gas reduction,Wood Pellet,Organic Rankine cycle,High-cycle Regenerative Combustion System,Life Cycle Assessment,SimaPro 8.0.3, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 195 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 環境工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 14.6 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。