請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18476
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊宗傑(Tsung-Chieh Yang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Po-Ju Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃柏儒 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:07:10Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] C.-Y. Hsu, T.-C. Yang, T.-M. Wang, L.-D. Lin, Effects of fabrication techniques on denture base adaptation: An in vitro study, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2020). [2] E. Anadioti, W.D. Gates III, J. Elpers, I.J. De Kok, L.F. Cooper, Retrospective cohort analysis of maxillary overdentures retained by unsplinted implants, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 122(3) (2019) 301-308. e1. [3] M.A. ELsyad, M.A. Dayekh, A.K. Khalifa, Locator Versus Bar Attachment Effect on the Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdenture: An In Vitro Study, Journal of Prosthodontics 28(2) (2019) e627-e636. [4] R. Morandi, L.M. Cabral, M. de Moraes, Implant-supported maxillary denture retained by a telescopic abutment system: A clinical report, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 117(3) (2017) 331-334. [5] Z. Bolender, G. Zarb, S. Eckert, Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients, Complete denture and implant-supported prostheses. Mosby (2004). [6] D.B. Murray MD, The evolution of the complete denture base. Theories of complete denture retention—a review. Part 1, Austral Dent J. 38(216-9) (1993). [7] M.M. Gad, S.M. Fouda, F.A. Al-Harbi, R. Näpänkangas, A. Raustia, PMMA denture base material enhancement: a review of fiber, filler, and nanofiller addition, International journal of nanomedicine 12 (2017) 3801. [8] A. Tomita, T. Gonda, T. Takahashi, Y. Maeda, A. Tomita, T. Gonda, T. Takahashi, Y. Maeda, Survey of Denture Repair Cases: Denture Reinforcement Makes Patients Able to Use Their Dentures for Longer Periods, International Journal of Prosthodontics 31(4) (2018). [9] J.B. Farmer, Preventive prosthodontics: Maxillary denture fracture, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 50(2) (1983) 172-175. [10] Z.N. Al‐Dwairi, K.Y. Tahboub, N.Z. Baba, C.J. Goodacre, A comparison of the flexural and impact strengths and flexural modulus of CAD/CAM and conventional heat‐cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), Journal of Prosthodontics 29(4) (2020) 341-349. [11] A.-D. Ayman, The residual monomer content and mechanical properties of CAD\CAM resins used in the fabrication of complete dentures as compared to heat cured resins, Electronic physician 9(7) (2017) 4766. [12] M. Kawara, O. Komiyama, S. Kimoto, N. Kobayashi, K. Kobayashi, K. Nemoto, Distortion behavior of heat-activated acrylic denture-base resin in conventional and long, low-temperature processing methods, Journal of dental research 77(6) (1998) 1446-1453. [13] M.D. Turd, B.R. Lang, D.E. Wilcox, J.C. Meiers, Direct measurement of dimensional accuracy with three denture-processing techniques, International Journal of Prosthodontics 5(4) (1992). [14] G. Zappini, A. Kammann, W. Wachter, Comparison of fracture tests of denture base materials, The journal of prosthetic dentistry 90(6) (2003) 578-585. [15] P. Vallittu, V. Lassila, Reinforcement of acrylic resin denture base material with metal or fibre strengtheners, Journal of oral rehabilitation 19(3) (1992) 225-230. [16] T. Takahashi, T. Gonda, Y. Maeda, Influence of reinforcing materials on strain of maxillary complete denture, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 71(2) (2013) 307-311. [17] Y. Takahashi, K. Yoshida, H. Shimizu, Effect of location of glass fiber-reinforced composite reinforcement on the flexural properties of a maxillary complete denture in vitro, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 69(4) (2011) 215-221. [18] J. John, S.A. Gangadhar, I. Shah, Flexural strength of heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture resin reinforced with glass, aramid, or nylon fibers, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 86(4) (2001) 424-427. [19] A. Sodagar, M.Z. Kassaee, A. Akhavan, N. Javadi, S. Arab, M.J. Kharazifard, Effect of silver nano particles on flexural strength of acrylic resins, Journal of prosthodontic research 56(2) (2012) 120-124. [20] H. Demir, O. Gorler, A. Dogan, S. Ozden, THE ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT PROPERTIES OF A DENTURE BASE POLYMER REINFORCED WITH VARIOUS FIBBERS, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of ACADEMIC RESEARCH 9(1) (2017). [21] U. Darbar, R. Huggett, A. Harrison, Stress analysis techniques in complete dentures, Journal of dentistry 22(5) (1994) 259-264. [22] J.R. Lambrecht, W.L. Kydd, A functional stress analysis of the maxillary complete denture base, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 12(5) (1962) 865-872. [23] A.E. Prombonas, D.S. Vlissidis, Comparison of the midline stress fields in maxillary and mandibular complete dentures: a pilot study, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 95(1) (2006) 63-70. [24] E. Bozdag, The impact of frenulum height on strains in maxillary denture bases, (2013). [25] G. Stafford, P.-O. Glantz, Intraoral strain gauge measurements on complete dentures: a methodological study, Journal of dentistry 19(2) (1991) 80-84. [26] S.E. Ghazali, P.-O. Glantz, E. Strandman, K. Randow, On the clinical deformation of maxillary complete dentures: Influence of denture-base design and shape of denture-bearing tissue, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 47(2) (1989) 69-76. [27] N.Z. Baba, Materials and processes for CAD/CAM complete denture fabrication, Current Oral Health Reports 3(3) (2016) 203-208. [28] A.S. Bidra, T.D. Taylor, J.R. Agar, Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 109(6) (2013) 361-366. [29] N. Kawahata, H. Ono, Y. Nishi, T. Hamano, E. Nagaoka, Trial of duplication procedure for complete dentures by CAD/CAM, Journal of oral rehabilitation 24(7) (1997) 540-548. [30] C.J. Goodacre, A. Garbacea, W.P. Naylor, T. Daher, C.B. Marchack, J. Lowry, CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 107(1) (2012) 34-46. [31] W. Han, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, Design and fabrication of complete dentures using CAD/CAM technology, Medicine 96(1) (2017). [32] B. Stawarczyk, B. Sener, A. Trottmann, M. Roos, M. Oezcan, C.H. Haemmerle, Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing, Dental materials journal 31(3) (2012) 377-383. [33] S. Yamamoto, M. Kanazawa, D. Hirayama, T. Nakamura, T. Arakida, S. Minakuchi, In vitro evaluation of basal shapes and offset values of artificial teeth for CAD/CAM complete dentures, Computers in biology and medicine 68 (2016) 84-89. [34] M. Kattadiyil, C. Goodacre, N. Baba, CAD/CAM complete dentures: a review of two commercial fabrication systems, Journal of the California Dental Association 41(6) (2013) 407-416. [35] M.S. Bilgin, A. Erdem, O.S. Aglarci, E. Dilber, Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM and RP technologies, Journal of Prosthodontics 24(7) (2015) 576-579. [36] M.S. Bilgin, E.N. Baytaroğlu, A. Erdem, E. Dilber, A review of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture techniques for removable denture fabrication, European journal of dentistry 10(02) (2016) 286-291. [37] Y. Maeda, M. Minoura, S. Tsutsumi, M. Okada, T. Nokubi, A CAD/CAM system for removable denture. Part I: Fabrication of complete dentures, international Journal of Prosthodontics 7(1) (1994). [38] Y. Sun, P. Lü, Y. Wang, Study on CAD RP for removable complete denture, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 93(3) (2009) 266-272. [39] H.-A. Kim, H.-P. Lim, H. Kang, H. Yang, S.-W. Park, K.-D. Yun, Fabrication of additive manufacturing interim denture and comparison with conventional interim denture: A case report, J Korean Acad Prosthodont 57(4) (2019) 483-489. [40] T.F. Alghazzawi, Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation, Journal of prosthodontic research 60(2) (2016) 72-84. [41] G. Alp, S. Murat, B. Yilmaz, Comparison of Flexural Strength of Different CAD/CAM PMMA‐Based Polymers, Journal of Prosthodontics 28(2) (2019) e491-e495. [42] Q. Alsandi, M. Ikeda, T. Nikaido, Y. Tsuchida, A. Sadr, N. Yui, T. Suzuki, J. Tagami, Evaluation of mechanical properties of new elastomer material applicable for dental 3D printer, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 100 (2019) 103390. [43] A.L. Machado, A.D. Puckett, L.C. Breeding, A.F. Wady, C.E. Vergani, Effect of thermocycling on the flexural and impact strength of urethane‐based and high‐impact denture base resins, Gerodontology 29(2) (2012) e318-e323. [44] R. Jagger, Effect of the curing cycle on some properties of a polymethylmethacrylate denture base material, Journal of oral rehabilitation 5(2) (1978) 151-157. [45] Y. Takahashi, J. Chai, M. Kawaguchi, Equilibrium strengths of denture polymers subjected to long-term water immersion, International Journal of Prosthodontics 12(4) (1999). [46] A. Liebermann, T. Wimmer, P.R. Schmidlin, H. Scherer, P. Löffler, M. Roos, B. Stawarczyk, Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 115(3) (2016) 321-328. e2. [47] G.A. Thompson, Q. Luo, Contribution of postpolymerization conditioning and storage environments to the mechanical properties of three interim restorative materials, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 112(3) (2014) 638-648. [48] R. Consani, S.S. Domitti, R. Barbosa, S. Consani, Effect of commercial acrylic resins on dimensional accuracy of the maxillary denture base, Brazilian dental journal (2002). [49] Y.Y. Cheng, W.L. Cheung, T.W. Chow, Strain analysis of maxillary complete denture with three-dimensional finite element method, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 103(5) (2010) 309-318. [50] V. Lassila, I. Holmlund, K.K. Koivumaa, Bite force and its correlations in different denture types, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 43(3) (1985) 127-132. [51] Ö.Y.K. Yıldız C., 2018, Complete Denture Prosthodontics. Springer, Cham (Single Complete Dentures) (2018) 243-270. [52] M.V. Kumar, S. Bhagath, J.B. Jei, Historical interest of denture base materials, Journal of Dental Sciences 1(1) (2010) 103-105. [53] M. Beyli, J. Von Fraunhofer, An analysis of causes of fracture of acrylic resin dentures, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 46(3) (1981) 238-241. [54] J.-i. Oku, Impact properties of acrylic denture base resin. 3. Impact properties of cross-linked polymers, Dental materials journal 8(2) (1989) 215-222. [55] D. Anthony, F. Peyton, Dimensional accuracy of various denture-base materials, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 12(1) (1962) 67-81. [56] T. Takamata, J.C. Setcos, Resin denture bases: review of accuracy and methods of polymerization, International Journal of Prosthodontics 2(6) (1989). [57] P.K. Vallittu, A review of fiber‐reinforced denture base resins, Journal of Prosthodontics 5(4) (1996) 270-276. [58] J. Chen, W. Lacefield, D. Castleberry, Effect of denture thickness and curing cycle on the dimensional stability of acrylic resin denture bases, Dental Materials 4(1) (1988) 20-24. [59] G.C. Anderson, J.K. Schulte, T.G. Arnold, Dimensional stability of injection and conventional processing of denture base acrylic resin, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 60(3) (1988) 394-398. [60] B.J. Goodacre, C.J. Goodacre, N.Z. Baba, M.T. Kattadiyil, Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 116(2) (2016) 249-256. [61] M. Srinivasan, Y. Cantin, A. Mehl, H. Gjengedal, F. Müller, M. Schimmel, CAD/CAM milled removable complete dentures: an in vitro evaluation of trueness, Clinical oral investigations 21(6) (2017) 2007-2019. [62] V. Prpic, I. Slacanin, Z. Schauperl, A. Catic, N. Dulcic, S. Cimic, A study of the flexural strength and surface hardness of different materials and technologies for occlusal device fabrication, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 121(6) (2019) 955-959. [63] H. Uchida, K. Kobayashi, M. Nagao, Measurement in vivo of masticatory mucosal thickness with 20 MHz B-mode ultrasonic diagnostic equipment, Journal of dental research 68(2) (1989) 95-100. [64] H.P. Müller, N. Schaller, T. Eger, A. Heinecke, Thickness of masticatory mucosa, Journal of clinical periodontology 27(6) (2000) 431-436. [65] S. Hirano, Study on analysis of viscoelastic property of palatal mucoperiosteum--about the creep recovery, Kokubyo Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Stomatological Society, Japan 59(1) (1992) 124-141. [66] S. Takeuchi, Y. Sato, Y. Sato, N. Kitagawa, O. Shimodaira, S. Hara, A. Isobe, Measurements of viscoelasticity of oral mucosa–establishing a simultaneous measurement method for load and change of the mucosa thickness, Ann Jpn Prosthodont Soc 2(2) (2010) 70-77. [67] A. Cilingir, H. Bilhan, G. Baysal, E. Sunbuloglu, E. Bozdag, The impact of frenulum height on strains in maxillary denture bases, The journal of advanced prosthodontics 5(4) (2013) 409-415. [68] T. Hada, T. Suzuki, S. Minakuchi, H. Takahashi, Reduction in maxillary complete denture deformation using framework material made by computer-aided design and manufacturing systems, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 103 (2020) 103514. [69] A. El‐Gheriani, A new guide for positioning of maxillary posterior denture teeth, Journal of oral rehabilitation 19(5) (1992) 535-538. [70] A. Prombonas, D. Vlissidis, Effects of the position of artificial teeth and load levels on stress in the complete maxillary denture, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 88(4) (2002) 415-422. [71] M. Ateş, A. Cilingir, T. Sülün, E. Sünbüloğlu, E. Bozdağ, The effect of occlusal contact localization on the stress distribution in complete maxillary denture, Journal of oral rehabilitation 33(7) (2006) 509-513. [72] D.R. Cagna, J.J. Massad, F.J. Schiesser, The neutral zone revisited: from historical concepts to modern application, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 101(6) (2009) 405-412. [73] M. Choi, V. Acharya, R.W. Berg, J. Marotta, C.C. Green, J.V. Barbizam, S.N. White, Resinous denture base fracture resistance: effects of thickness and teeth, International Journal of Prosthodontics 25(1) (2012). [74] T. Watanabe, [Study of masticatory forces of complete denture wearers], Kokubyo Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Stomatological Society, Japan 57(1) (1990) 16-31. [75] T. Gonda, K. Ikebe, J. Dong, T. Nokubi, Effect of Reinforcement on Overdenture Strain, Journal of Dental Research 86(7) (2007) 667-671. [76] A.E. Prombonas, D.S. Vlissidis, P.A. Maria, P.A. Nikolas, The stress state of the fraenal notch region in complete upper dentures, Medical Engineering Physics 34(10) (2012) 1477-1482. [77] N.M. Ajaj-ALKordy, M.H. Alsaadi, Elastic modulus and flexural strength comparisons of high-impact and traditional denture base acrylic resins, The Saudi dental journal 26(1) (2014) 15-18. [78] A. Parvizi, T. Lindquist, R. Schneider, D. Williamson, D. Boyer, D.V. Dawson, Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of injection‐molded denture base materials to that of conventional pressure‐pack acrylic resin, Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry 13(2) (2004) 83-89. [79] O. Steinmassl, V. Offermanns, W. Stöckl, H. Dumfahrt, I. Grunert, P.-A. Steinmassl, In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD/CAM denture base resins, Materials 11(3) (2018) 401. [80] R. Hague, S. Mansour, N. Saleh, R. Harris, Materials analysis of stereolithography resins for use in rapid manufacturing, Journal of materials science 39(7) (2004) 2457-2464. [81] A. Unkovskiy, P.H.-B. Bui, C. Schille, J. Geis-Gerstorfer, F. Huettig, S. Spintzyk, Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereolithographically printed resin, Dental Materials 34(12) (2018) e324-e333. [82] C.-H. Lin, Y.-M. Lin, Y.-L. Lai, S.-Y. Lee, Mechanical properties, accuracy, and cytotoxicity of UV-polymerized 3D printing resins composed of Bis-EMA, UDMA, and TEGDMA, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 123(2) (2020) 349-354. [83] K. Puebla, K. Arcaute, R. Quintana, R.B. Wicker, Effects of environmental conditions, aging, and build orientations on the mechanical properties of ASTM type I specimens manufactured via stereolithography, Rapid Prototyping Journal (2012). [84] K. Chockalingam, N. Jawahar, U. Chandrasekhar, Influence of layer thickness on mechanical properties in stereolithography, Rapid Prototyping Journal (2006). [85] M. Srinivasan, H. Gjengedal, M. Cattani-Lorente, M. Moussa, S. Durual, M. Schimmel, F. Müller, CAD/CAM milled complete removable dental prostheses: An in vitro evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface roughness, Dental materials journal (2018) 2017-207. [86] V. Alt, M. Hannig, B. Wöstmann, M. Balkenhol, Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations, Dental materials 27(4) (2011) 339-347. [87] A. Tahayeri, M. Morgan, A.P. Fugolin, D. Bompolaki, A. Athirasala, C.S. Pfeifer, J.L. Ferracane, L.E. Bertassoni, 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials, Dental Materials 34(2) (2018) 192-200. [88] V. Prpić, Z. Schauperl, A. Ćatić, N. Dulčić, S. Čimić, Comparison of Mechanical Properties of 3D‐Printed, CAD/CAM, and Conventional Denture Base Materials, Journal of Prosthodontics (2020). [89] F. Teraoka, J. Takahashi, Controlled polymerization system for fabricating precise dentures, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 83(5) (2000) 514-520. [90] J. Yao, J. Li, Y. Wang, H. Huang, Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 112(3) (2014) 649-657. [91] V.O. Väyrynen, J. Tanner, P.K. Vallittu, The anisotropicity of the flexural properties of an occlusal device material processed by stereolithography, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 116(5) (2016) 811-817. [92] M. Reymus, R. Fabritius, A. Keßler, R. Hickel, D. Edelhoff, B. Stawarczyk, Fracture load of 3D-printed fixed dental prostheses compared with milled and conventionally fabricated ones: the impact of resin material, build direction, post-curing, and artificial aging—an in vitro study, Clinical Oral Investigations 24(2) (2020) 701-710. [93] B. Stawarczyk, A. Ender, A. Trottmann, M. Özcan, J. Fischer, C.H. Hämmerle, Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens, Clinical oral investigations 16(6) (2012) 1669-1677. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18476 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 實驗目的:本研究目的在檢測樹脂熱聚合加壓及注射方式與數位化技術電腦設計切削及3D列印所製作之上顎活動義齒基底,在受力後的應變分布及材料老化加工後對應變分布的影響。
材料與方法:基於本研究團隊先前研究[1]製作出的上顎鈷鉻合金 ( cobalt-chrome alloy ) 金屬參考模,以透明壓克力樹脂翻製成測試模型,並以2 mm 厚之矽膠印模材製作出軟組織墊片置於測試模型上,用以模擬上顎無牙嵴之黏膜構造。而後,依據金屬參考模之組織面,分別採用下列三種製程、各二種材料(共計六種組合)製備出上顎全口義齒基底板:(1) 樹脂熱聚合製程 [注射成型 (injection molding, IM group)、壓縮成型 (compression molding, CM group)] ;(2) CAD/CAM切削製程 ( CCM-P group、CCM-Y group );(3) 3D列印製程 ( 3DP-B group、3DP-N group),每種材料各包含五個樣品 (共計30個) 上顎全口義齒基底板以供測試。義齒基底完成後,於拋光面黏貼應變規 (strain gauge ),以測得CH1:唇繫帶切跡 (labial notch)、CH2:橫向義齒基底中線前緣( anterior middle base plate – transverse )、CH3:上顎後障 (post dam)、CH4:縱向義齒基底中線前緣 ( anterior middle base plate – axial)、CH5:左側頰繫帶切跡 (left buccal notch)、CH6 CH7:左側齒槽脊前緣及後緣 (left anterior and posterior ridge crest ) 等七處不同走向或位置之受力應變。就義齒基底受力後之應變分布,本研究所採取之測試方式為:將測試模型固定於萬能試驗機 (universal testing machine)上,並將待測試之義齒基底放置於測試模型上,施以5公斤重垂直定力後,記錄應變數值,完成初始測量;而在材料老化加工後之受力應變測試方法為:以彈性防水漆覆蓋於應變規上,將義齒基底置於37度恆溫蒸餾水中浸泡 14 天,移出恆溫水浴槽後按照前述義齒基底受力應變之測試方法,完成浸泡14天之應變測量;接續前一步驟,再次將義齒基底置入37度恆溫蒸餾水中浸泡 14 天並測量其應變,完成浸泡28天之受力應變測試。本研究之統計方式則使用Mann-Whitney U test進行樹脂熱聚合、CAD/CAM milled與3D printing三種製程中兩種不同材料的比較,另以Kruskal -Wallis test 進行三種製程間的比較,同時採Dunn’s test進行事後檢定 (post-hoc test) ,最後以Wilcoxon signed rank sum test來評估IM group, CM group, CCM-P group, CCM-Y group, 3DP-B及3DP-N各組老化加工前後應變值是否有差異,有意義水準設於p小於0.05。 實驗結果:初始進行義齒基底受力應變測量時,同種製程之兩種材料大多呈現同為拉伸應變 (Tensile strain, 簡稱拉應變) 或是壓縮應變 (compressive strain, 簡稱壓應變) 等相類似的應變傾向,且三種製程均分別由大至小於上顎後障 ( CH3 )、左側齒槽脊後緣 ( CH7 )、唇繫帶切跡 ( CH1 )呈現明顯的應變。又CAD/CAM切削及列印兩種數位製程的應變趨勢亦相近,但CAD/CAM切削製程之應變小於3D 列印製程,且標準差顯示出3D 列印製程有較大的應變分布。而材料經28天老化加工後,樹脂熱聚合製程及CAD/CAM切削製程的兩種材料在浸泡過後還是各自呈現相似的應變變化,但是在3D列印製程中的兩種不同材料則顯示出較大的應變變化趨勢差異。再者,在將義齒基底浸泡14天之後,幾乎所有製程都有應變增加,而增加浸泡時間到28天後,應變則均有下降的趨勢,但除了3D printing製程之外,老化測試前後的應變大小沒有統計上的顯著差異。另外,各製程間的差異也隨著浸泡時間增加而逐漸縮小,而且從各位置觀察應變變化率,可以發現CAD/CAM 切削有最小的變化率,乃三種製程中較為穩定,樹脂熱聚合次之,3D printing 製程則有最大變化。 結論:樹脂熱聚合、CAD/CAM切削與3D 列印製程都可以觀察到在唇繫帶切跡 ( CH1 )、上顎後障 ( CH3 ) 以及左側齒槽脊後緣 ( CH7 )有較大的應變。在上顎後障(CH3 )處,3D printing組呈現較CAD/CAM 切削組大的壓應變;樹脂熱聚合製程則為應變值大於CAD/CAM milled與3D printing的拉應變。三種製程製作之義齒基底在老化加工之後,皆會出現受力後應變下降的趨勢。其中CAD/CAM milled製程的變化最小,熱聚合製程次之,3D printing group則是有最大的變化。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was evaluation of strain distribution between maxillary denture base which were fabricated by CAD/CAM milled, 3D printed and conventional heat polymerized resin ( compression/injection molding ) method after the static force loading and material aging process.
Materials and methods: Based on the research by our research team [1], the metal cobalt-chrome alloy reference model was converted into a test model which made with transparent acrylic resin. A 2mm artificial gingiva made with silicon impression material was placed on the test model to simulate the structure of the maxillary edentulous mucosa. According to the intaglio surface of the metal reference model, the following three different process method containing 2 materials each ( six materials in total ) were used to fabricated the base plate of the maxillary denture base : (1) conventional heat-polymerized resin process [ injection molding group, IM group), compression molding, CM group ]; (2) CAD / CAM milled process (CCM-P group, CCM-Y group); (3) 3D printing process (3DP-B group, 3DP-N group ), five denture bases were fabricated for each material (total sample size = 30). Since the denture base were completed, seven strain gauges were then attached on the polishing surface in different position and direction as following order : CH1: labial notch, CH2: transvers anterior middle base plate, CH3: maxillary Post-dam, CH4: axial anterior middle base plate, CH5: left buccal notch, CH6 CH7 : left anterior and posterior ridge crest. Strain distribution data with static loaded denture base were collected by following method: fixed the test model on the universal testing machine, place the denture base to be tested on the model, apply an axial static load of 5 kg and record the strain value, complete the initial measurement. Test method of strain distribution after material aging processing: covered the strain gauge with waterproof varnish, then stored the denture base in 37 degrees constant temperature distilled water for 14 days. After removed the denture base from the constant temperature water bath, using the same method of initial measurement, collecting the strain distribution data of the denture bases went through 14 days artificial aging and static loaded. Following the previous step, the denture bases were placed in 37 degree constant temperature distilled water again for another 14 days, and the strain of 28 days aging was measured. Statistically, we use Mann-Whitney U test to compare two materials in the same process method. Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare the three process methods, with Dunn's test method for post-hoc test. Last, Wilcoxon signed rank sum test were used to evaluated IM group, CM group, CCM-P group, CCM-Y group, 3DP-B and 3DP-N the difference between initial and after aging. The significant difference level is set at p <0.05. Results: During the initial strain measurement, two materials of the same process method showed similar strain tendency mostly, and the most significant strains present in the following three spots with descending sequence: Maxillary post dam (CH3), left posterior ridge crest (CH7) and labial notch (CH1). The strain distribution trend of the two digital method are similar and the CAD/CAM milling process present lesser strain than 3D printing, and the standard deviation of 3D printing shows largest data deviation. After the material is artificial aged for 28 days, the two materials of the conventional heat polymerized and CAD/CAM milled still exhibit similar strain changes after immersion, but the trend of the 3D printing process is quite different. Moreover, almost all process methods present increased strain after immersion for 14 days. While increasing the soaking time to 28 days, the strain tends to decrease, and the difference between the various process method becomes smaller, but no statically significant difference except for 3D printing process. Somehow, the difference between process method decreased after artificial aging, CAD/CAM milled with the lowest changing rate, followed by heat polymerized, the 3D printing has the greatest change. Conclusion: Significant strain could be observed in labial notch (CH1 ), post dam (CH3) and left posterior ridge crest (CH7) of denture base which were fabricated by heat polymerized, CAD/CAM milled and 3D printing process. In the Post dam (CH3), 3D printing group exhibits larger compressive strain than the CAD/CAM milled group. Meanwhile, the heat polymerized process has greater tensile strain value than the CAD/CAM milled and 3D printing. After the denture bases made by the three processes were aged, the strain tends to decrease after loading. Among them, the CAD/CAM milled process has the smallest changes, followed by the heat polymerized process, and the 3D printing group has the largest changes. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:07:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1208202014370800.pdf: 6610724 bytes, checksum: 7aba68c4f7c3ecb3c1fa9b42630a5171 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中 文 摘 要 I Abstract IV 目 錄 VII 第一章 文獻回顧 1 1.1 傳統方式製作上顎活動義齒之方法及臨床問題 2 1.2 強化上顎義齒基底及改進之方法 3 1.3 應力造成之義齒破裂及應變測量 4 1.4 數位製程用在活動義齒的應用 5 1.4.1 以減法工程製作義齒之流程及優缺點 5 1.4.2 以加法工程製作義齒之流程及優缺點 6 1.5 數位製程之機械性質及老化測試 7 第二章 研究動機與目的 10 第三章 材料與方法 11 一、實驗用模型製作: 11 二、實驗用義齒基底製作: 12 四、施力設備之設置及應變測試: 16 五、浸泡液體後應變測試: 17 第四章 實驗結果 18 第五章 討論 36 5.1實驗模型的製作 37 5.2義齒基底之設計及應變規測量位置的選擇 38 5.3樹脂熱聚合製程之義齒基底的應變分布 40 5.4 CAD/CAM切削製程之義齒基底的應變分布 41 5.5 3D列印製程之義齒基底的應變分布 42 5.6不同製程之義齒基底應變差異的探討 43 5.7老化加工對於義齒基底應變差異的探討 46 5.8 實驗的誤差與限制 48 第六章 結論 50 第七章 未來展望 51 參考文獻 103 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 樹脂加壓及注射成形方式與數位切削列印方式製作之上顎無牙義齒基底應變分布之評估 - 體外實驗 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Evaluation the strain distribution of maxillary denture base fabricated by compression molded, injection molded, CAD/CAM milled and 3D printed techniques - An In Vitro Study | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林立德(Li-Deh Lin) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪志遠(Chi-Yuan Hong) | |
dc.subject.keyword | CAD/CAM切削,3D列印,熱聚合樹脂,上顎活動義齒,應變,老化加工測試, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | CAD/CAM milled,3D printing,Heat-polymerized resin,Maxillary denture,strain distribution,artificial aging, | en |
dc.relation.page | 110 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003088 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床牙醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床牙醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1208202014370800.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.46 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。