請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18388完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳玲玲(Ling-Ling Wu),黃慕萱(Mu-Hsuan Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ya-Ting Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林雅亭 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:02:43Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-10-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-09-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ahuja, G. (2000). The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 317-343.
Ahuja, G., & Katila. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197-220. Almeida, P. (1996). Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 155-165. Almeida, P., & Grant, R. M. (1998). International corporations and cross-border knowledge transfer in the semiconductor industry. A Report to the Carnegie-Bosch Institute, March. Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905-917. Almeida, P., & Phene, A. (2004). Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8‐9), 847-864. Amabile, T. M., Cont, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58, 53-66. Appleyard, M. M. (1996). How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 137-154. Argote, L., Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for comparative advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1) 150-169. Arrow, K. J. (1974). The Limits of Organization. Norton, New York. Atuahene-Gima, K. (1996). Market orientation and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 35(2), 93-103. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M.P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640. Baltagi, B.H. (1995). Econometris Analysis of Panel Data, Chichester, Wiley. Balthasar, A., Battig, C., Thierstein, A., & Wilhelm, B. (2000). 'Developers': Key actors of the innovation process. Types of developers and their contacts to institutions involved in research and development, Continuing education and training, and the transfer of technology. Technovation, 20, 523-539. Baysinger, B., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1989). Diversification strategy and R&D intensity in multi-product firms. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 310-332. Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of knowledge on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312-330. Benner, M., & Waldfogel, J. (2008). Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity. Research Policy, 37(9), 1556-1567. Bhattacharya, M., & Bloch, H. (2004). Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics, 22, 155-162. Blair, D. C. (2002). Knowledge management: hype, hope, or help?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 1019-1028. Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74. Bottero, W., & Prandy, K. (2003). Social interaction distance and stratification. British Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 177-197. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57. Buch, C. M., & DeLong, G.. (2004). Cross-border bank mergers: What lures the rare animal. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(9), 2077-2102. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S.T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524. Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24(1), 29-39. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169-1184. Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. L. (2000). The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1–17. Chauvin, K. W., & Hirschey, M. (1993). Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm. Financial Management, 22(4), 128-140. Cho, H. J., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 555-575. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99, 569-596. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. Cowan, R., David, P. A., & Foray, D. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 211-253. Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 928-938. Cumming, J., & Teng, B. (2003). Transferring R&D knowledge: The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1-2), 39-68. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409. Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovation in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 45-65. Deng, Y. (2008). The value of knowledge spillovers in the U.S. semiconductor industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25, 1044–1058. Diaz, R. M. (1983). Thought and two languages: The impact of bilingualism on cognitive development. Review of Research in Education, 10, 23-54. Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117-132. Flor, M. L., & Oltra, M. J. (2004). Identification of innovating firms through technological innovation indicators: an application to the Spanish ceramic tile industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 323-336. Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154-177. Fosfuri, A., & Tribo, J. A. (2008). Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance. Omega, 36(2), 173-187. Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. (2002). Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge in organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8(1), 49-67. Franko, L.G. (1989). Global corporate competition: Who's winning, who’s losing and the R&D factor as one reason why. Strategic Management Journal, 10(5), 449-474. French, S. (2000). Re-scaling the economic geography of knowledge and information: constructing life assurance markets. Geoforum, 31(1), 101-119. Galunic, D., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1193-1201. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage. Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & van den Oord, A. (2008). Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37(10), 1717-1731. Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. (2003). Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 366-382. Gomes-Casseres, B., Hagedoorn, J., & Jaffe, A. B. (2006). Do alliances promote knowledge flows?. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(1), 5-33. Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 768-792. Haas, M. R., & Hansen, M. T. (2007). Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 28(11), 1133–1153. Hall, B. H. (1993). The stock market’s valuation of R&D investment during the 1980s. The American Economic Review, 83(2), 259-264. Hall, B. H., & Ham, R. M. (1999). The patent paradox revisited: determinants of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1980-94 (No. w7062). National Bureau of Economic Research. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2000). Market value and patent citations: A first look (No. w7741). National Bureau of Economic Research. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (No. w8498). National Bureau of Economic Research. Hambrick, D. C., & MacMillan, I. (1985). Efficiency of product R&D in business units: The role of strategic context. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 527-547. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1), 83-103. Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111. Hansen, M., & Lovas, B. (2004). How multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 801-822. Hargadon, A. B. (2002). Brokering knowledge: linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 41-85. Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343-1363. Hausman, J. A., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52, 909-938. He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494. Herkema, S. (2003), A complex adaptive perspective on learning within innovation projects. The Learning Organization, 10(6), 340-346. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Ireland, R. D., & Harrison, J.S. (1991). Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 693-706. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. (1996). The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1084-1119. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767-798. Hitt, M. A., Keats, B. W., & DeMarie, S. (1998). Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 22-42. Hu, A.G. Z., & Jaffe, A. B. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(6), 849-880. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. Y. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54. Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 8, 105-136. Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63(3), 577-598. Janssens, M., Lambert, J., & Steyaert, C. (2004). Developing language strategies for international companies: the contribution of translation studies. Journal of World Business, 39(4), 414-430. Ji, L. J., Zhang, Z., & Nisbett, R. E. (2004). Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 57-65. Johnson, D. K., Siripong, A., & Brown, A. S. (2006). The demise of distance? The declining role of physical proximity for knowledge transmission. Growth and Change, 37(1), 19-33. Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 525-544. Katila, R. A., & Ahuja G. (2002). Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194. Keizer, J. A., Dijkstra, L., & Halman, J. (2002). Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs. An exploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in Netherlands. Technovation, 22(1), 1-13. Ketelhohn, N.W. (2006). The role of clusters as sources of dynamic externalities in the US semiconductor industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(5), 679-699. Kochhar, R., & David, P. (1996). Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 73-84. Kogut, B., Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397. Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., & Ioannou, G. (2011). Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1335-1343. Lagerstrom, K., & Andersson, M. (2003). Creating and sharing knowledge within a transnational team—the development of a global business system. Journal of World Business, 38(2), 84-95. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461-477. Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1139-1161. Lanjouw, J. O., & Mody, A. (1996). Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy, 25(4), 549-571. Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition. The RAND Journal of Economics, 129-151. Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Economic Journal, 114(695), 441-465. Lauring, J., & Selmer, J. (2011). Multicultural organizations: common language, knowledge sharing and performance. Personnel Review, 40(3), 324-343. Lerner, J. (1994). The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. The RAND Journal of Economics, 319-333. Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization and value relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107-138. Lim, K. (2004). The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981-1997). Research Policy, 33, 287-321. Linden, G., Brown, C., & Appleyard, M. (2004). The net world order’s influence on global leadership in the semiconductor industry. Locating Global Advantage: Industry Dynamics in the International Economy, 232-257. MacGarvie, M. (2005). The determinants of international knowledge diffusion as measured by patent citations. Economics Letters, 87(1), 121-126. Macher, J. T. (2006). Technological development and the boundaries of the firm: A knowledge based examination in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Science, 52(6), 826-843. Manu, F. A., & Sriram, V. (1996). Innovation, marketing strategy, environment, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 35(1), 79-91. Martin, X., & Salomon, R. (2003). Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(4), 356-373. Maurseth, P. B., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Knowledge spillovers in Europe: A patent citations analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4), 531-545. Mazloomi, H. (2011). Discerning the Role of Partner Technological Complementarity and Diversity in Innovative Performance. McDougall, P. P., & Oviatt, B. M. (2000). International entrepreneurship: the intersection of two research paths. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 902-906. McFadyen, M. A., & Cannella, A. A. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 735-746. McKinley, E., Waiti, P. M., & Bell, B. (1992). Language, culture and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 579-595. McMillan-Capehart, A. (2005). A configurational framework for diversity: Socialization and culture. Personnel Review, 34(4), 488-503. Megna, P., & Klock, M. (1993). The impact of intangible capital on Tobin's q in the semiconductor industry. The American Economic Review, 83(2), 265-269. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1978). Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 24(9), 921-933. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press. O'Brien J. P. (2003). The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 415-431. Paniccia, I. (1998). One, a hundred, thousands of industrial districts. Organizational variety in local networks of small and medium-sized enterprises. Organization Studies, 19(4), 667-699. Pavitt, K. (1987). The objectives of technology policy. Science and Public Policy, 14(4), 182-188. Pedersen, T., Petersen, B., & Sharma, D. (2003). Knowledge transfer performance of multinational companies. In Governing Knowledge-Processes (pp.69-90). Gabler Verlag. Peretto, P., & Smulders, S. (2002). Technological distance, growth, and scale effects. The Economic Journal, 112(481), 603-624. Peri, G. (2005). Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 308-322. Phene, A., & Almeida, P. (2008). Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 901-919. Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Marsh, L. (2006). Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 369-388. Podolny, J. M., & Stuart, T. E. (1995). A role-based ecology of technological change. American Journal of Sociology, 1224-1260. Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. University of Chicago Press. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard business review. Prajogo, D.I. (2006). The relationship between innovation and business performance—A comparative study between manufacturing and service firms. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 218-225. Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240-267. Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12(4), 502-517. Redner, S. (2005). Citation Statistics from 110 Years of Physical Review. Physics Today, 58(6), 49-54. Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 141-153. Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6), 751-766. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287-306. Santangelo, G. (2000). Corporate strategic technological partnerships in the European information and communications technology industry. Research Policy, 29(9), 1015-1031. Schilling, M. A., & Phelps, C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113-1126. Schulz, M. (2001). The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 661-682. Scott, A. J., & Angel, D. P. (1987). The US semiconductor industry: a locational analysis. Environment and Planning A, 19(7), 875-912. Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994). Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 387-394. Sher, P. J., & Yang, P. Y. (2005). The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: the evidence of Taiwan's semiconductor industry. Technovation, 25(1), 33-43. Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595-623. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312-320. Song, J., Almeida, P., & Wu, G.. (2003). Learning by hiring: when is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Science, 49(4), 351-365. Song, J., & Shin, J. (2008). The paradox of technological capabilities: A study of knowledge sourcing from host countries of overseas R&D operations. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(2), 291-303. Stewart, D. W., & Kamins, M. A. (1993). Secondary Research: Information sources and methods (2nd Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Stolpe, M. (2001). Mobility of Research Workers and Knowledge Diffusion as Evidenced in Patent Data. The Case of Liquid Crystal Display Technology. Stover, M. (2004). Making tacit knowledge explicit: the Ready Reference Database as codified knowledge. Reference Services Review, 32(2), 164-173. Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791-811. Stuart, T. E, & Podolny, J. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1), 21-38. Swan, J. A., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., & Hislop, D. (1999). Knowledge management and innovation: networks and networking. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(4), 262-275. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 27-43. Tallman, S., & Phene, A. (2007). Leveraging knowledge across geographic boundaries. Organization Science, 18(2), 252-260. Ter Wal, A. L. J., & Boschma, R. A. (2009). Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 739-756. Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(1), 1-20. Thornhill, S. (2006). Knowledge, innovation and SME performance: contrasts between high- and low-technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 687-703. Tong, X., & Frame, J. D. (1994). Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data. Research Policy, 23(2), 133-141. Torre, A. (2008). On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional Studies, 42(6), 869-889. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of inventions. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172-187. Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004. Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition and intraorganizsational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13 (2), 179-190. Tushman, M. (1977). Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 22(4), 587-605. Wallsten, S. J. (2001). An empirical test of geographic knowledge spillovers using geographic information systems and firm-level data. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31(5), 571-599. Wan, D., Ong, C. H., & Lee, F. (2003). Determinants of firm innovation in Singapore. Technovation, 25(3), 261-273. West, M. A., & Altink, W. M. (1996). Innovation at work: Individual, group, organizational, and socio-historical perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 3-11. Wu, J., & Shanley, M. T. (2009). Knowledge stock, exploration, and innovation: Research on the United States electromedical device industry. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 474-483. Yamin, M., & Otto, J. (2004). Patterns of knowledge flows and MNE innovation performance. Journal of International Management, 10(2), 239-258. Zahra, S. A. (1996). Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713-1735. Zajac E. J., Kraatz, M. S., & Bresser R. K. F. (2000). Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: a normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 429-453. Ziedonis, R. H. (2004). Don't fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Science, 50(6), 804-820. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18388 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究使用次級資料法，觀察知識來源異質性、知識流動、創新和財務績效之間的關係。研究中對於知識來源異質性主要著重在三項構面：地域差異性、技術差異性以及語言差異性。我們認為因為知識來源端與接收端之間的差異程度會增加彼此之間的障礙而使得知識難以流動，所以知識來源異質性會阻礙知識流動。另一方面，知識來源異質性能為企業帶來更廣泛且非冗餘的想法和專業知識，藉以促進創新表現，所以我們認為知識來源異質性能正向調節知識流動與創新之間的關係。另外，由於企業能藉由創新獲得更好的產品發展或服務流程而有助於其成長或獲利，所以我們認為創新能提高企業的財務績效。
透過408家半導體企業在1987-2007年期間來自於USPTO的專利引用資料對假設進行驗證。我們使用負二項回歸模型檢視知識來源異質性對於知識流動的效應，研究結果發現技術差異性與語言差異性會降低企業之間的知識流動，而地域差異性對於企業之間的知識流動則是沒有顯著的影響。另外，透過負二項回歸模型檢視知識來源異質性對於知識流動與創新之間正向關係的調節效應，結果顯示技術差異性能正向調節知識流動與創新之間的關係，而地域差異性與語言差異性則是沒有顯著的正向調節作用。本研究的結論是，知識來源異質性雖然會降低企業之間的知識流動，但是卻能正向調節知識流動與創新之間的關係，使知識流動為創新帶來更高的效應。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study used secondary data analysis to observe the relationship among knowledge source heterogeneity, knowledge flow, innovation and financial performance. We focused on three dimensions of knowledge source heterogeneity: geographical dissimilarity, technological dissimilarity, and language difference and hypothesized that knowledge source heterogeneity decrease knowledge flow because the extent of differences between the knowledge source and the recipient might increase barriers and hence make knowledge hardly to flow. On the other hand, the knowledge source heterogeneity might bring broader and nonredundant ideas or expertise for firms to facilitate innovation performance and thus we hypothesized that knowledge source heterogeneity has positive moderation effects on the relationship between knowledge flow and innovation. Furthermore, we also hypothesized that innovation increases financial performance because firms could have better development of products or service processes to benefit its growth or profitability.
Hypotheses were tested by using patent citation data from USPTO of 408 firms in semiconductor industry in the period from 1987 to 2007. We used negative binomial regression model to examine the effect of knowledge source heterogeneity on the knowledge flow. The results indicated that technological dissimilarity and language difference have negative impact on the knowledge flow, while geographical dissimilarity has no significantly effects on the knowledge flow. Besides, we examined moderation effects of knowledge source heterogeneity on the relationship between knowledge flow and innovation by using negative binomial regression model. The results showed that technological dissimilarity positively moderates the effect of knowledge flow on innovation, while geographical dissimilarity and language difference have no positive and significant moderation effects on the relationship between knowledge flow and innovation. In this study, we found that although knowledge source heterogeneity increases barriers between firms and influenced the ease of knowledge flow, it has positive moderation effects that makes knowledge flow lead to higher innovation performance. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:02:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R00725006-1.pdf: 880971 bytes, checksum: fae8eecd5802544f60e5b164e8cc91f9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv CONTENTS vi LIST OF FIGURES viii LIST OF TABLES ix Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review 4 2.1 Knowledge Flow and Innovation 4 2.2 Knowledge Source Heterogeneity and Knowledge Flow 5 2.2.1 Geographical dissimilarity and knowledge flow 6 2.2.2 Technological dissimilarity and knowledge flow 7 2.2.3 Language difference and knowledge flow 8 2.3 Moderation Effects of Knowledge Source Heterogeneity 8 2.3.1 Moderation effects of geographical dissimilarity 9 2.3.2 Moderation effects of technological dissimilarity 10 2.3.3 Moderation effects of language difference. 10 2.4 Innovation and Financial Performance 11 2.5 Research Model 12 Chapter 3 Methodology 13 3.1 Secondary Data Analysis 13 3.2 Patent Data 14 3.3 Sample 14 3.4 Data Collection 16 3.5 Dependent Variable 17 3.5.1 Financial performance 17 3.5.2 Innovation 18 3.5.3 Knowledge flow 19 3.6 Independent Variable 20 3.6.1 Geographical dissimilarity 20 3.6.2 Technological dissimilarity 20 3.6.3 Language difference 21 3.7 Control variable 21 3.7.1 Firm size 21 3.7.2 Firm age 22 3.7.3 R&D intensity 22 3.7.4 Average citation age 23 3.7.5 Current ratio 23 3.8 Statistical Methods 24 Chapter 4 Results 25 4.1 The Effect of the Knowledge Source Heterogeneity on Knowledge Flow 25 4.2 Moderation Effects of Knowledge Source Heterogeneity on the Relationship between Knowledge Flow and Innovation 26 4.3 The Effect of the Innovation on Financial Performance 34 Chapter 5 Conclusions and Discussions 37 Chapter 6 Limitations and Extensions 44 REFERENCE 46 Appendix A. Descriptive Statistics and Correlations 62 Appendix B. Effects of Knowledge Source Heterogeneity on Knowledge Flow 67 Appendix C. Moderation Effects of Knowledge Source Heterogeneity on the Relationship between Knowledge Flow and Innovation 68 Appendix D. Effects of Innovation on Financial Performance 76 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 知識來源異質性、知識流動與創新 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Knowledge Source Heterogeneity, Knowledge Flow and Innovation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 翁崇雄(Chorng-Shyong Ong),盧希鵬(Hsi-Peng Lu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 知識來源異質性,知識流動,創新,專利引用,半導體產業,負二項回歸模型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | knowledge source heterogeneity,knowledge flow,innovation,patent citation,semiconductor industry,negative binomial regression model, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 78 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-09-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 860.32 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。