請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18354完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林維真(Weijane Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jui-Ying Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王睿英 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:01:08Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-09-16 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王沂柔（2007）。圖書資訊學教育中資訊倫理課程之探討(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/664nwq。 朱建民（1996）。專業倫理教育的理論與實踐。通識教育季刊，3(2)，33-56。doi:10.6745/JGE.199606_3(2).0003 李宜玫、林世華（2009）。國小教師倫理決定模式之驗證。教育心理學報。 李德竹、莊道明（1996）。我國大學圖書館資訊倫理認知與問題之研究。臺北市立圖書館館訊，14(1)，3-19。 周倩、吳歡鵲、陳茵嵐、王美鴻（2009）。「資訊素養與倫理」大學通識教育課程-理念、主題、 教學策略與執行成效。大學圖書館，13（2），24-44。 吳寂絹、邱銘心（2011）。在國內圖書資訊學領域的發展概況。圖書資訊學刊，9（2），123-156。 岳修平、林維真（2014）。運用假設演繹模式建立探究社群學習平台以培養學生職場倫理推論能力：以資訊科技系學生及相關人員為研究對象。(NSC102-2511-S002-007-MY2) 林建宏、周倩（2014）。我國大專院校資訊科系之資訊倫理相關課程開設現況研究。教育科學研究期刊，59（1），197-228。 林建宏、周倩（2016）。我國大專院校資訊相關科系學生之資訊專業倫理另有概念探究。 Management，23（4）， 473-502。 侯政宏、崔夢萍（2013）。問題導向網路學習系統應用於國小五年級資訊素養與倫理之研究-著作權單元為例。教育傳播與科技研究，104，17-36。 阿濱茂樹（2013）。図書館と情報モラル。東京 : 青弓社。 張志銘、周倩（2019）。國小六年級網路品德教育的課程設計於實施研究。課程與教育季刊，22（4），1-25。 莊道明（1998）。我國學術資訊網路使用及資訊倫理教育之研究。圖書館學刊，13，169-197。 黃國禎、蘇俊銘、陳年興（2012）。數位學習導論與實務。博碩文化股份有限公司。 賴阿福（2019）。臺北市國小高年級學童資訊倫理認知表現及數位說故事對其資訊倫理之成效研究。課程與教育季刊，22（4），59-95。 ACM(2018). ACM Code of Ethics and Professional. Retrieved from https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics Abt, C.C. (1970). Serious Games. NY: The Viking Press. Adams, J. S., Tashchian, A., Shore, T. H. (2001). Codes of ethics as signals for ethical behavior. Journal of Business ethics, 29(3), 199-211. ALA(2008). Code of Ethics of American Library Association. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/tools/ethics Aristotle, (350BC). Nichomachean ethics. Cambridge, Cambridge. Backlund, P., Engstrom, H., Johannesson, M., Lebram, M. (2007, July). Games and traffic safety-an experimental study in a game-based simulation environment. In 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV'07) (pp. 908-916). IEEE. Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N. E., Arnold, D. G. (Eds.). (2004). Ethical theory and business. Caihong, G. (2010, May). Research on the cultivation of teachers' information ethics. In 2010 International Symposium on Computer, Communication, Control and Automation (3CA) (Vol. 1, pp. 154-157). IEEE. Carbo, T. (2004). Models for ethical decision-making for use in teaching information ethics: Challenges for educating diverse information professionals. International Journal of Information Ethics, 2, 1-9. Chang, C. L. H. (2011). The effect of an information ethics course on the information ethics values of students–A Chinese guanxi culture perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 2028-2038. Cheng, M. T., Rosenheck, L., Lin, C. Y., Klopfer, E. (2017). Analyzing gameplay data to inform feedback loops in The Radix Endeavor. Computers Education, 111, 60-73. Consalvo, M., Costikyan, G., Davidson, D., Fortugno, N., Shaenfield, D., Vigeant, P., Weaver, C, Schrier, K. (2011). Quick Takes on Ethics and Games. Cross, N., Edmonds, E. A. (Eds.). (2003). Expertise in Design: Design Thinking Research Symposium 6,... University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, 17-19 November 2003. Yusuf Pisan. Department of Education, Taipei City Government. (n.d.) Information Literacy and Ethics. Retrieved from http://ile.tp.edu.tw/ Dow, M. J., Boettcher, C. A., Diego, J. F., Karch, M. E., Todd-Diaz, A., Woods, K. M. (2015). Case-based learning as pedagogy for teaching information ethics based on the Dervin sense-making methodology. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 56(2), 141-157. Ess, C. (2013). Digital media ethics. Polity. Fallis, D. (2007). Information ethics for twenty-first century library professionals. Library hi tech, 25(1), 23-36. Fleischmann, K. R., Robbins, R. W., Wallace, W. A. (2009). Designing educational cases for intercultural information ethics: The importance of diversity, perspectives, values, and pluralism. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 4-14. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation gaming, 33(4), 441-467. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Harvard University Press. Hess, T., Gunter, G. (2013). Serious game‐based and nongame‐based online courses: Learning experiences and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 372-385. Himma, K. E., Fallis, D. (2007). Information ethics for twenty‐first century library professionals. Library hi tech. Hodhod, R., Cairns, P., Kudenko, D. (2011). Fostering character education with games and interactive story generation. In Designing Games for Ethics: Models, Techniques and Frameworks (pp. 208-233). IGI Global. Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., Kuo, Y. C., Lin, P. C. (2017). Confusion affects gameplay. Learning and Individual Differences, 59, 119-126. Hunt, S. D., Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of macromarketing, 6(1), 5-16. IEEE. (n.d.). IEEE Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html IFLA. (2016). IFLA Code of Ethics for Librarians and other Information Workers (full version). Retrieved from https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11092 Jaffee, S., Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 703–726. Jonassen, D. H. (1999a). Constructivist learning environments on the web: engaging students in meaningful learning. In the Education Technology Conference and Exhibition, 1911, 9-11 February, SUNTEC City, Singapore. Jonassen, D. (1999b). Designing constructivist learning environments. In Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 215-239). University Park: Pennsylvania State University. Juul, J. (2005). Half-real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kant, I., (1785). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Yale, New Haven. Kouchaki, M., Dobson, K. S., Waytz, A., Kteily, N. S. (2018). The link between self-dehumanization and immoral behavior. Psychological science, 29(8), 1234-1246. Knox, E. J. M. (2016). Ethics. In Smith, L.C. Wong, M.A. (Eds.). Reference and information services An introduction (5th ed.) (pp. 27-41). Santa Barbara, CA Libraries Unlimited. Kouchaki, M., Kray, L. J. (2018). “I won't let you down:” Personal ethical lapses arising from women’s advocating for others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 147, 147-157. Kulman, R., Stoner, G., Ruffolo, L., Marshall, S., Slater, J., Dyl, A., Cheng, A. (2011). Teaching executive functions, self-management, and ethical decision-making through popular videogame play. In Designing games for ethics: Models, techniques and frameworks (pp. 193-207). IGI Global. LAROC. (2002). Code of Professional Ethics for Librarians in Taiwan. Retrieved from http://www.lac.org.tw/law/12 Lercari, N., Onsurez, L., Schultz, J. (2013, October). Multimodal reconstruction of landscape in serious games for heritage: An insight on the creation of Fort Ross Virtual Warehouse serious game. In 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage) (Vol. 2, pp. 231-238). IEEE. Mason, R. O. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quarterly, 10(1), 5-12. Marquardt, N., Hoeger, R. (2009). The effect of implicit moral attitudes on managerial decision-making: An implicit social cognition approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 157-171. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (n.d.). The MIT Scheller Teacher Education Program. Retrieved from https://education.mit.edu/ McNamara, A., Smith, J., Murphy-Hill, E. (2018, October). Does ACM’s code of ethics change ethical decision making in software development?. In Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (pp. 729-733). ACM. McMenemy, D., Poulter, A., Burton, P. (2014). A handbook of ethical practice: a practical guide to dealing with ethical issues in information and library work. Elsevier. Michael, D. R., Chen, S. L. (2005). Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. Muska Lipman/Premier-Trade. Mill, J. S., (1859). On liberty, Hackett, Indianapolis. Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., Lukas, J. F. (2003). A brief introduction to evidence‐centered design. ETS Research Report Series, 2003(1), i-29. MIT Education Arcade. (2015). Better Learning in Games. Retrieved from https://education.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/BalancedDesignGuide2015.pdf MIT iCampus. (n.d.). Games to Teach. Retrieved from http://icampus.mit.edu/projects/project/?pname=GamesToTeach MIT STEP Lab Presents. (n.d.). Shadowspect A game-based assessment for geometry and spatial reasoning. Retrieved from https://education.mit.edu/project/shadowspect/#overview Ministry of Defense. (2019). Master's Choice. Retrieved from https://ethics.mnd.gov.tw/EditPage/?PageID=7de28d53-8bdd-4f1c-a8f0-1369d52fd404 Ministry of Education. (2020). Gender statistics summary data. Retrieved from https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/cp.aspx?n=DCD2BE18CFAF30D0 Markey, K., Leeder, C., Hofer, A. (2011). BiblioBouts: What’s in the game?. College Research Libraries News, 72(11), 632-645. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.72.11.8668 Moore, A. D. (Ed.). (2005). Information ethics: Privacy, property, and power. University of Washington Press. Nicholson, S. (2010). Everyone plays at the library : creating great gaming experiences for all ages. Medford, N.J.: Information Today. Ocholla, D. (2009). Information ethics education in Africa. Where do we stand?. The International Information Library Review, 41(2), 79-88. O'Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. The Cirriculum Journal, 16(4), 455-474. Peace, A. G. (2011). Using debates to teach information ethics. Journal of Information Systems Education, 22(3), 6. Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 21. Ramsey, V. J., Fitzgibbons, D. E. (2005). Being in the classroom. Journal of Management Education, 29(2), 333–356 Rawls, J., (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard Cambridge. Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P. (2009). Serious games: Explication of an oxymoron-introduction. Serious games: Mechanics and effects, 3-9. Rosario, R. A., Widmeyer, G. R. (2009). An exploratory review of design principles in constructivist gaming learning environments. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(3), 289. Ross, W. D., (1930). The right and the good. Oxford, Oxford. Rush, L. (2014). Learning through play, the old school way: Teaching information ethics to millennials. Stevenson, J. (2011). A framework for classification and criticism of ethical games. In Designing games for ethics: Models, techniques and frameworks (pp. 36-55). IGI Global. Tavani, H. T. (2011). Ethics and technology: Controversies, questions, and strategies for ethical computing. John Wiley Sons. Thong, J. Y., Yap, C. S. (1998). Testing an ethical decision-making theory: The case of softlifting. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(1), 213-237. Tsai, F. H., Yu, K. C., Hsiao, H. S. (2007, March). Designing constructivist learning environment in online game. In 2007 First IEEE International Workshop on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (DIGITEL'07) (pp. 212-214). IEEE. Verma, P., Mohapatra, S., Löwstedt, J. (2016). Ethics training in the Indian IT sector: Formal, informal or both?. Journal of business ethics, 133(1), 73-93. Werner, K. (2013). Bringing them in: Developing a gaming program for the library. Library trends, 61(4), 790-801. Westera, W., Nadolski, R. J., Hummel, H. G., Wopereis, I. G. (2008). Serious games for higher education: a framework for reducing design complexity. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 420-432. Wouters, P., Van der Spek, E. D., Van Oostendorp, H. (2009). Current practices in serious game research: A review from a learning outcomes perspective. In Games-based learning advancements for multi-sensory human computer interfaces: techniques and effective practices (pp. 232-250). IGI Global. Zagal, J. P. (2009, August). Ethically Notable Videogames: Moral Dilemmas and Gameplay. In DiGRA conference. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18354 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著科技發展，資訊的傳播變得越來越快速且複雜。因此，資訊倫理對於規範資訊使用與建立資訊服務原則也變得越來越重要。然而，過去研究指出資訊倫理的教育和專業培訓的資源仍然不足。在現今資訊社會中，無法滿足不同資訊工作者廣泛、分散且跨領域的資訊倫理學習需求。基於上述理由，本研究設計並開發了一款資訊倫理嚴肅遊戲，以作為一種具真實性和自主學習的環境，並期待該遊戲能夠滿足職前資訊工作者的資訊倫理學習需求。遊戲設計遵循探究性(probing principle)和分散式原則(distributed principle)，並基於一般行銷倫理理論模型(General Theory of Marketing Ethics Model)的要素設計遊戲中的線索，以協助與訓練資訊從業人員適切的倫理決策。 本研究共招募40名主修資訊相關領域之大學生與研究生，包含20名圖書資訊與資訊服務相關領域和20名資訊工程與資訊科技相關領域的大學生及研究生。研究結果顯示，所有的受試者在進行嚴肅遊戲後，職業倫理測驗分數都有顯著的提升（p <.05），但圖資與資工兩個專業領域之間並沒有顯著差異。而除了客觀的分數提升外，主觀在知識、敏感度、技能與態度方面也有正向的學習滿意度。受試者認為本研究所提供之嚴肅遊戲可以幫助他們解決未來在工作場所中遇到的資訊倫理問題。最後，本研究根據研究結果與發現，討論各類遊戲化資訊倫理學習輔助的設計，探討其滿意度和有用性，並為今後的實務與研究提供建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The literacy and ethics of information have become more important for establishing principles for information services with the rapid development of information communication technology. However, the educational and professional training resources of information ethics remained scarce, which could not meet the scattered, cross-domain, and broad needs in different occupations. Motivated by the above issues, this study approached the phenomenon of information ethic education from the perspective of educational games. By designing and developing a situated serious game as an authentic and autonomous learning environment to guide learning of information ethics, it was expected that the game could meet the demands of information ethics learning for pre-service information workers. The design of the serious game adopted probing and distributed principles, and the training materials were developed with reference to the general theory of marketing ethics model as a framework to facilitate proper ethical decision-making. 40 college students volunteered to join the study, consisted of 20 majored in information science and 20 majored in computer science. The results of the study showed that participants’ average scores, in spite of their different majors, of Professional Ethics Test were significantly improved after they played the serious game (p < .05). In addition to the growth of scores, participants’ subjective perception and learning satisfaction was also high toward the game. Participants recognized the helpfulness of the game in improving their knowledge, sensitivity, skill and attitude to the related ethic issues, and facilitate their decisions in the workplace in the future. Therefore the game helps them to deal with the information ethics issues in the workplace in the future. Based on the findings of the study, suggestions to future studies of information ethics education as well as practices of game design were provided. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:01:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1208202020224200.pdf: 3078646 bytes, checksum: 42136a8b6bce53b1d320bdff4b46e4ed (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii Contents v Tables vi Figures viii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research background and motivation 1 1.2 Research purpose and research question 5 2 Literature review 7 2.1 Information ethics 7 2.2 Serious games in education 28 3 Methodology 35 3.1 Participants 35 3.2 Instruments and settings 36 3.3 Experiments design and Data Analysis 45 3.4 Pilot study 48 4 Results and discussion 51 4.1 Participants’ learning outcomes of information ethics 52 4.2 Participants’ learning outcomes of information ethics in different information professional disciplines 56 4.3 Participants’ satisfaction of information ethics serious game features 64 4.4 Participants’ information ethical decision-making processing in Professional Ethics Test and information ethics serious game 70 5 Conclusion 75 References 78 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 嚴肅遊戲導入職前資訊工作者之資訊倫理學習 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Developing a serious game for pre-service information workers’ learning of information ethics | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊東謀(Tung-Mou Yang),岳修平(Hsiu-Ping Yueh),韓義興(Yi-Hsing Han) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 嚴肅遊戲,遊戲式學習,遊戲設計,資訊倫理,資訊素養, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | serious game,game-based learning,game design,information ethics,information literacy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 88 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003151 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1208202020224200.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.01 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。