請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17965完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 曾惠斌 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ching-Yuan Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃靖媛 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T00:47:15Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-09-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abidali, A.F. and Harris, F.(1995). “A methodology for predicting company failure in the
Construction industry.” Construction Management and Economics, 13(3), 189-196. Altman, E. I. (1968). “Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate Bankruptcy.” Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589 – 609. Arditi, D., Koksal, A., & Kale, S. (2000). “Business failures in the construction industry.” Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 7(2), 120‐132 Arora, N., Bohn, J. R. and Zhu, F. (2005). Reduced form vs. structural models of credit Risk: a case study of three models” Moody’s KMV Company. Assaf, S. and Jannadi, M.O. (1994). “A multi-criterion decision-making model for contractor prequalification selection.” Building Research & Information, 22(6), 332-335. Awad, A. and Fayek, A. R. (2012). “Contractor default prediction model for surety Boinding1.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, (39), 1027-1042. Beaver, W. H. (1966). “Financial ratios as predictors of failure.” Journal of Accounting Research, 4, 71 – 111. Bharath, S. T., and Shumway, T. (2008). “Forecasting default with the Merton distance to default model.” The Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), 1339–1369. Black, F., and Scholes, M. (1973). “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637-654. Campell, J. Y. Hilscher, J., Szilagyi J. (2008). “In search of distress risk.” Journal Of Financial, American Finance Association, 63(6), 2899-2939. Chen, R. R. (1996). “Understanding and managing interest rate risks.” World Scientific,, Chapter 5. Chen, T.-K., Liao H.-H., Lu, C.-W. (2011). “A flow-based corporate credit model.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 36(4), 517-532 Chin, H. W. (2009) “A barrier option framework for predicting insolvency of construction firms,” M.S. Thesis of Civil Engineering Department, National Taiwan University. Crosbie, P., and Bohn, J. (2003). “Modeling Default Risk.” Moody’s KMV, <http://www.moodyskmv.com/research/files/wp/ModelingDefaultrisk.pdf> (Dec 18, 2003). Damodaran, Aswath, “Ups and Downs: Valuing Cyclical and Commodity Companies.” (September 1, 2009) Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1466041 Davydenko, S.A., (2007). “When Do Firms Default? A study of the Default Boundary.” Working Paper. Version 1. University of Toronto Davydenko, Sergei A., (2012) “When Do Firms Default? A Study of the Default Boundary.” EFA Moscow Meetings Paper; AFA San Francisco Meetings Paper; WFA Keystone Meetings Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=672343 Duff & Phelps (March 20, 2013) “Risk Premium Report Client Alert”. Duff & Phelps. Duffie, D. and Singleton, K. J. (1999). “Modeling the term structures of defaultable Bonds.” Review of Financial Studies, 12, 687-720. Edum-Fotwe, F., Price, A. and Thorpe, A. (1996). “A Review of financial ratio tools for predicting contractor insolvency.” Construction Management and Economist, 14, 189-198. El-Sawalhi, N., Eaton, D., and Rustom, R. (2007). “Contractor pre-qualification model: State-of-the-art.” International Journal of Project Management, 25(5), 465-474. Fan, Joseph P.H., Titman, S., Twite, G. (2006). “An international comparison of capital structure and debt maturity choices.” Working Paper. The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Gharghori, P., Chan, H. and Faff, R. (2006). “Investigating the performance of alternative default-risk models: Option-based versus accounting-based approaches.” Australian Journal of Management, 31(2), 207-234. Hardle, W. K. and Prastyo, D. D. (2013). “Default Risk Calculation based on Predictor Selection for the Southeast Asian Industry.” Discussion Paper. SFB 649 Economic Risk. Hillegeist, S. A., Keating, E. K., Cram, D. P., Lundstedt, K. G. (2004). “Assessing the probability of bankruptcy.” Review of Accounting Studies, 9, 5-34, Holt, G.D., Olomolaiye, P. O. and Harris, F. C. (1994). “Applying multi-attribute analysis to contractor selection decisions.” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 1(3), 139-148. Horngren, C. T. and Harrison, W. T. (2007). Accounting, Pearson Education. Hosmer, D. W., and Lemeshow, S. (2000). “Applied logistic Regression.” 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. Huang, J. Z., and Huang M. (2003). “How much of the corporate-Treasury yield spread is due to credit risk?” Working Paper. Pennsylvania State University. Jarrow, R. A. and Protterb, P. (2004). “Structural versus reduced form models: A new information based perspective.” Journal of Investment Management, 2(2), 1-10. Jarrow, R. and Turnbull, S. (1992). “Credit Risk: Drawing the Analogy.” Risk Magazine 5(9). Jarrow, R. A. and Turnbull, S. M. (1995). “:Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk.” Journal of Finance, 50, 53-86. Kangari, R., Farid, F. and Elgharib, H. M. (1992). “Financial performance analysis for construction - industry.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(2), 349-361. Lando, D. (1998). “On cox processes and credit risky securities.” Review of Derivatives Research, 2, 99-120. Lee, S. Y. (2012). “Contractor Financial Prequalification – Cash Flow Based Structural Model Associated with Dynamic Threshold.” M.S. Thesis of Civil Engineering Department, National Taiwan University. Lei, M. C. (2011). “Assessing the credit risk of construction contractors using cash flow based credit model.” M.S. Thesis of Civil Engineering Department, National Taiwan University. Leland, H. and Toft, K. (1996). “Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy, and the term structure of credit spreads.” Journal of Finance, 51, 987-1019. Leland, H. E. (2004). “Predictions of Default Probabilities in Structural Models of Debt.” Journal of Investment Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, Second Quarter 2004. Liao, H. H., and Chen, T. K. (2006). “A cash flow based multi-period corporate credit model.” Avaialbe at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=753304. Lando, D. (1998). “On cox processes and credit risky securities.” Review of Derivatives Research, 2, 99-120. Mason, R. J. and Harris, F.C. (1979). “Predicting company failure in the construction industry.” Proceedings Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 66, pp. 301-307. Merton, R.C. (1974). “On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates.” The Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449-470. Navon, R. (2004). “Company-level cash-flow management.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(1), 22-9. Ohlson, J. A. (1980). “Financail ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy.” Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109-131. Park, H. K., Hans, S.H., Russell, J. S. (2005). “Cash flow forecasting model for general contractors using moving weights of cost categories.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 21(4), 164-172. Peer S., and Rosental, H. (1982). “Development of cost flow model for industrialized housing.” Nat Build. Res. Station, Technion, Haifa, Isreal (in Hebrew) Reisz, A. S., and Perlich, C. (2007). “A market-based framework for bankruptcy prediction.” Journal of Financial Stability, 3(2), 85-131. Russell, J. (1991). “Contractor failure: Analysis.” Journal of Performance of Construction Facilities,163‐180. Russell, J. S. (1996). Constructor prequalification: Choosing the best constructor and avoid constructor failure. Reston:ASCE Press. Russell, J. S., and Skibniewski, M. J. (1998). “Decision Criteria in Contractor Prequalification.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 4(2), 148-164. Russell, J., and Zhai, H. (1996). “Predicting Contractor Failure Using Stochastic Dynamics of Economic and Financial Variables.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(2), 183-191. Schweser, K. (2008). Free Cash Flow Valuation, CFA Institute. Severson, G., Russell, J., and Jaselskis, E. (1994). “Predicting Contract Surety Bond Claims Using Contractor Financial Data.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 18(3), 111-119. Sign, S., and Lakanathen, G. (1992). “Computer-Based Cash Flow Model.” Proceedings of the 36th Annual Transactions of the American Association of Cost Engineers-AACE, R.5.1-R.5.14. Tserng, H. P., Liao, H. H., Tasi, L. K., Chen, P. C. (2011) “Predicting Construction Contractor Default with Opton-Based Credit Models-Model’s Performance and Comparison with Financial Ratio Models.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(6), 412-420. Vassalou, M., and Xing, Y. (2004). “Default Risk in Equity Returns.” Journal of Finance, 59(2), 831-868. Wharton Research Data Services (2015). The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. http://wrds.wharton.upeen.edu (March. 2015) Yu, F. (2005) “Accounting Transparency and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads.” Journal of Financial Economics, 75(1), 53-84. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17965 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 信用風險管理是一個對業主及營建公司雙方都非常重要的事，信用危機的發生，往往對雙方造成龐大的損失。因此建立一套信用風險管理對雙方而言是個非常重要的課題，風險預審的目的是挑選出最適合的廠商或者業者，進而減少工程失敗的風險，審查標準包含了技術、管理能力、安全考量、環境及財務狀況，其中營建公司現金流量是一個最重要因素，現金流動不僅會使營建公司無法如期履行其債務，進而導致公司面臨週轉困難，甚至破產，這將使造成建設中工程延緩或者失敗。
今日業主廣泛使用會計信用評分法以及財務信用評分法來對營建公司進行財務風險的評估，但會計信用評分法所使用的財報內容容易被人為操控，而且有時間落差的現象。而財務信用評分法的主要基礎是以股票所反應出的公司價值為主，並且假設公司所有的價值是如實反應在股票市場上，但現實上股票時常未能正確反應出公司的價值。 本研究藉結構型現金流量基礎模型來對營建公司的財務風險進行分析，公司的財務風險與其是否有足夠現金來週轉其債務有高度關聯，本研究導入結構型現金流量基礎模型來模擬該公司的信用風險分數，業主可利用此分數來判別該建商是否符合財務資格，由於結構型現金流量基礎模型僅需要財報中的現金流量做為評計基礎，此模型適用於上市及非上市營建公司。 本研究模擬出營建公司未來三年的財務信用風險，然後將之與各公司標準普爾(Standard and poor)信用等級做比較，本研究同時借用接受者操作特性曲線(R.O.C.)來評估本模型的辨別能力，研究結果第一年AUC:0.8833，第二年AUC:0.85，及至第三年AUC:0.85，R.O.C.結果證實結構型現金流量基礎模型是適用於營建業的財務風險評估，本研究期望此模型能建立成一個適合於營造業的財務預警分析模型，業主能藉此模型更準確篩選出財務能力佳的營建公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Evaluating a company’s financial health has always been a difficult proposition for construction industry. Credit risk evaluation challenges investors, financial institutions and academics alike. The construction industry has come to rely on two distinguished credit risk evaluation methods: the accounting-based method depends on a corporate balance sheet as a guide, whereas the market-based model relies on market information to predict financial distress. However, present credit risk evaluation models have their limitations. A corporate balance sheet is easily manipulated by management, and the market information method is based on the presumption that stock price is a full reflection of market information, which is doubtful even among scholars.
This study evaluates a cash flow-based credit model proposed by Liao and Chen (2006). This model uses free cash flow to predict the credit qualities of construction contractors. In addition, this study uses the Area Under Curve (AUC) to determine the model’s discriminatory Performance. The Model’s performance will be benchmarked against Standard and Poor’s credit rating of the sample construction contractors. The empirical results indicate that the cash flow-based model has an excellent discriminatory power: AUC = 0.8833 in the first year, AUC = 0.85 in the second year and AUC = 0.85 in the third year. This model proves to be a useful tool in assessing the credit risk of construction Contractors. It is both applicable in listed and private construction contractors since this model only needs the information from accounting statements. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:47:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-P01521708-1.pdf: 1404952 bytes, checksum: 1fbc21c3e23c47a6ecc480f5d8376995 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書………………………………………………………......... ……. ……..... i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………………………………………………………...............ii
ABSTRACT IN CHINESE ……………………………………………………………...... iii ABSTRACT IN ENGLISH ………………………………………………………………. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………....... v LIST OF FIGURES …………………………………………………………………...… viii LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………………... ix Chapter 1. Instruction …………………………………………………………………….... 1 1.1 Background ………………………………………………………………….... 1 1.2 Motivations and Problem Statements ……...……………………………...…...2 1.2.1 Credit Risk Assessment for the Construction Industry…….............. 3 1.2.2 The Unique Financial Risk in Construction Industry ……...……... .4 1.3 Purpose and Contributions …………………………………………………... ..7 1.4 Research Procedure ………………………………………………………..… ..8 1.5 Framework of the Thesis …………………………………………………..…...8 Chapter 2. Literature Review ……………………………………………………………. ..9 2.1 Structural-Model …………………………………………….………...……......9 2.2 Reduced-form Models ...…………………………………….………………... 10 2.3 Financial Ratio-Based Models …………………………….…………………. 10 2.4 Cash Flow Based Multi-Period Credit Model …………….……………..…… 14 2.5 Summary ………….………………………………………………………….. 17 Chapter 3. Methodology …………………………………………………………………. 18 3.1 Research Methodology ………………………………………………………. 18 3.2 The Characteristics of a Firm’s Free Cash Flow ……………………….......... 22 3.3 Cash Flow Based Multi-Period Credit Model ……………………………….. 24 3.3.1 Estimation of the State Factor Parameters ………………………….. 24 3.3.2 Estimation of a Firm’s Multi-Period Cash Flow ……………...…..... 25 3.3.3 Estimation of a Firm’s Weighted Average Cost of Capital …………. 26 3.3.4 Estimating a Firm’s Multi-Period Asset Distribution …………..…... 27 3.4 Default Threshold …………………………………………………………..… 27 3.5 Credit Quality Score ………………………………………………………….. 29 3.6 Model Evaluation (ROC curve) ……….……………………………...…….... 30 3.7 Summary ……………………………………………………………………... 31 Chapter 4. Empirical Application ……………………………………………………….. 33 4.1 Data and Collection ………………………………………………………….. 33 4.2 The Selection of Cash Flow Proxy …………………………………………... 36 4.3 Factor Analysis and Parameter Estimations of the State Factor ………..……. 37 4.4 Estimation of a Firm’s Weighted Average Cost of Capital …………….…….. 39 4.5 Estimation of Constant Growth Rate ……………………………………….... 41 4.6 Estimation of the Shift Term to a Firm’s Cash Flow Paths ………………….. 41 4.7 The Setting of Default Thresholds …………………………………………... 43 4.8 Credit Quality Score and Model Discriminatory Power …………………….. 44 4.9 Summary …………………………………………………………………….. 49 Chapter 5. Conclusions …………………………………………………………………... 51 References ………………………………………………………………………………... 54 Appendixes ……………………………………………………………………………….. 60 Appendix I The Description of Standard & Poor’s Issuer Credit Ratings Categories (Source : Compustat Database) …………………………………………………... 60 Appendix II The Time Series of Free Cash Flow Pattern of Construction Firms ... 62 Appendix III Factor Analysis of Firm’s Free Cash Flows ……………………….. 66 Appendix IV Maximum Likelihood Algorithm for Factor Generating Formula ... 69 Appendix V Cash Flow Shift Term Estimates ……………..…………………….. 71 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Procedure of Research ……………………………………………………….. .8 Figure 3.1 Flowchart of Methodology …………………………………………………... 20 Figure 3.2 Flowchart of Cash Flow Based Multi-Period Credit Model …………………. 21 Figure 3.3 Free Cash to Firm per unit asset ……………………………………...……… 23 Figure 3.4 An example of a ROC curve …………………………………………………. 31 Figure 4.1 AUC Result of Cash Flow Based Multi-Period Credit Model in 1-Year ...…... 47 Figure 4.2 AUC Result of Cash Flow Based Multi-Period Credit Model in 2-Year …...... 47 Figure 4.3 AUC Result of Cash Flow Based Multi-Period Credit Model in 3-Year …….. 48 LIST OF TABLES Table 4.1 List of Construction Firms …………………………………………...………. 35 Table 4.2 Parameters Estimations for State Factor Process ……………………..……... 38 Table 4.3 The Estimation Results of Each Firm’s WACC ……………………………… 40 Table 4.4 The Estimation Results of Each Contractor’s Implied Cash Flow Shift Term 42 Table 4.5 Calculation Result of Each Firm’s Default Boundary …………………………. 44 Table 4.6 Credit Quality Score ……………………………………………………….…... 45 Table 4.7 AUC of Cash Flow Based Multi-Period Credit Model ……………….……….. 46 Table III-1 Factor Extraction ………..……………………………...……………….……. 66 Table III-2 Factor Loading .………………………….………………………….…….... 67 Table III-3 State Factor Values ….………………….…………………………………….. 68 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 運用現金流量模式篩選財務健全公司 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Prequalifying Financial Competent Company
by Cash Flow Credit Model | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周瑞生,林祐正,黃文顥 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 營建公司,信用風險,現金流量基礎模型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | construction industry,credit risk evaluation,cash flow-based structure model, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 78 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-27 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.37 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。