請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17878
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 劉心才(Hsin-Tsai Liu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chih-Chun Shun | en |
dc.contributor.author | 孫稚鈞 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T00:45:17Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-11 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Armstrong, C. S., J. E. Core and W. R. Guay. 2012. When Do Independent Directors Improve Firms' Information Environments? Unpublished Manuscript
Armstrong, C. S., J. E. Core and W. R. Guay. 2014. Do independent directors cause improvements in firm transparency? Journal of Financial Economics 113: 383–403. Anderson, R. C., S. Mansi and D. M. Reeb. 2004. Board Characteristics, Accounting Report Integrity, and the Cost of Debt. Journal of Accounting & Economics 37: 315-342. Bertoni, F., M. Meoli, and S. Vismara. 2014. Board Independence, Ownership Structure and the Valuation of IPOs in Continental Europe. Corporate Governance: An International Review 22(2): 116-131. Bhagat, S. and B. S. Black. 2002. The Non-Correlation between Board Independence and Long-Term Firm Performance. Journal of Corporation Law 27: 231-273. Bohren, O. and R. O. Strom. 2010. Governance and Politics: Regulating Independence and Diversity in the Board Room. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 37(9) & (10): 1281–1308. Borokhovich, K. A., K. R. Brunarski, M. S. Donahue and Y. S. Harman. 2006. The Importance of Board Quality in the Event of a CEO Death. Financial Review 41(3): 307-337. Bradley, M. and D. Chen. 2015. Does Board Independence Reduce the Cost of Debt? Financial Management 44: 15–47. Bühner, R. 1987. Assessing international diversification of West German corporations. Strategic Management Journal 8(1): 25–37. Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson, T. L. Neal and R. A. Riley. 2002 Board Characteristics and Audit Fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 19(3): 365–384. Carpenter, M. A. and J. W. Fredrickson. 2001. Top Management Teams, Global Strategic Posture, and the Moderating Role of Uncertainty. The Academy of Management Journal 44(3): 533-545. Chancharat, N., C. Krishnamurti, and G. Tian. 2012. Board Structure and Survival of New Economy IPO Firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review 20(2): 144–163. Chen, H.-L. 2011. Does Board Independence Influence the Top Management Team? Evidence from Strategic Decisions toward Internationalization. Corporate Governance: An International Review 19: 334–350. Chen, X., Q. Cheng and X. Wang. 2014. Does Increased Board Independence Reduce Earnings Management? Evidence from Recent Regulatory Reforms. Singapore Management University School of Accountancy Research Paper No. 2015-20. Chen, Y.-R., Y.-L. Huang and C.-N. Chen. 2009. Financing Constraints, Ownership Control, and Cross-Border M&As: Evidence from Nine East Asian Economies. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17: 665–680. Chenga, E. C. M. and S. M. Courtenay. 2006. Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure The International Journal of Accounting 41(3): 262–289 Chhaochharia, V. and Y. Grinstein. 2009. CEO Compensation and Board Structure. The Journal of Finance 64: 231–261. Dastidar, P. 2009. International Corporate Diversification and Performance: Does Firm Self-Selection Matter? Journal of International Business Studies 40: 71–85. Duchin, R., J. G. Matsusaka and O. Ozbas. 2010. When are outside directors effective? Journal of Financial Economics 96(2): 195–214. Farinha, J. and L. F. Viana. 2009. Board Structure and Modified Audit Opinions: Evidence from the Portuguese Stock Exchange. International Journal of Auditing 13:237–258. Francis, B., I. Hasan, M. Koetter and Q. Wu. 2012. Corporate Boards and Bank Loan Contracting. Journal of Financial Research 35(4): 521–552. Frankel, R., S. McVay, M. Soliman. 2011. Non-GAAP earnings and board independence Review of Accounting Studies 16(4): 719-744. Gani, L. and J. Jermias. 2006. Investigating the effect of board independence on performance across different strategies The International Journal of Accounting 41(3): 295–314. Geringer, M., P. W. J. Beamish, and R. C. Dacosta. 1989. Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal 10(2): 109–119. Gomes, L. and K. Ramaswamy. 1999. An Empirical Examination of the Form of the Relationship between Multinationality and Performance. Journal of International Business Studies 30(1): 173-187. Grant, R. M., A. P. Jammine and H. Thomas. 1988. Diversity, Diversification, and Profitability among British Manufacturing Companies, 1972-1984. Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 771-801. Gul, F. A. and S. Leung. 2004. Board Leadership, Outside Directors’ Expertise and Voluntary Corporate Disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23: 351–379. Graves, C. and J. Thomas. 2006. Internationalization of Australian family businesses: A managerial capabilities perspective. Family Business Review 19: 207–224. Hendry, K. and G. Kiel. 2004. The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organizational control perspectives. International Conference on Corporate Governance and Board Leadership. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., U.S.A. Herrmann, P. and D. K. Datta. 2005. Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management 16:69–78. Hillman, A. J. and T. Dalziel. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review 28: 383-396. Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskisson and H. Kim. 1997. International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified Firms. The Academy of Management Journal 40(4): 767-798. Hoskisson, R. E., R. A. Johnson and D. D. Moesel. 1994. Corporate divestiture intensity in restructuring firms: effects of governance, strategy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal 37:1207–51. Kim, B., M. L. Burns and J. E. Prescott. 2009. The strategic role of the board: The impact of board structure on top management team strategic action capability. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17: 728–743. Klein, A. 2006. Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management NYU, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 06-42. Knyazeva, A., D. Knyazeva and R. W. Masulis. 2013. The Supply of Corporate Directors and Board Independence. Review of Financial Studies 26(6): 1561-1605. Kobrin, S. J. 1991. An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration. Strategic Management Journal 12(1): 17–31. Kotabe, M. 1990. The Relationship between Offshore Sourcing and Innovativeness of U.S. Multinational Firms: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of International Business Studies 12(4): 623-638. Lin, W.-T. 2012. Family ownership and internationalization processes: Internationalization pace, internationalization scope, and internationalization rhythm. European Management Journal 30(1): 47–56. Lu, J. W. & P. W. Beamish. 2004. International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal 47: 598–609. Luan, C.-J. and M.-J. Tang. 2007. Where is Independent Director Efficacy? Corporate Governance: An International Review 15(4): 636-643. Moini, A.H. 1995. An inquiry into successful exporting: an empirical investigation using a three-stage model. Journal of Small Business Management 33: 9 – 25. Musteen, M., D. K. Datta and P. Herrmann. 2009. Ownership structure and CEO compensation: Implications for the choice of foreign market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies 40: 321–338. Muth, M. M. and L. Donaldson. 1998. Stewardship theory and board structure: Contingency approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review 6: 5–28 Nadler, D., B. Behan and M. Nadler. 2006. Building better boards: A blueprint for effective governance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Ni, Y. and L. Purda. 2012. Does Monitoring by Independent Directors Reduce Firm Risk? Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Working Paper. Osma, B. G. 2008. Board Independence and Real Earnings Management: The Case of R&D Expenditure. Corporate Governance: An International Review 12(6): 116-131. Park, Y. W. and H.-H. Shin. 2004. Board composition and earnings management in Canada Journal of Corporate Finance 10(3): 431–457. Peasnell, K.V., P.F. Pope and S. Young. 2005. Board Monitoring and Earnings Management: Do Outside Directors Influence Abnormal Accruals? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 32(7&8): 1311–1346. Rivas, J. L. 2012. Diversity and internationalization: The case of boards and TMT’s. International Business Review 21(1): 1–12. Ruigrok, W. and H. Wagner. 2003. Internationalization and Performance: An Organizational Learning Perspective. Management International Review 43: 63-83. Sambharya, R. B. 1996. Foreign Experience of Top Management Teams and International Diversification Strategies of U.S. Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal 17(9): 739–746. Sanders, WM. G. and M. A. Carpenter. 1998. Internationalization and Firm Governance: The Roles of CEO Compensation, Top Team Composition, and Board Structure The Academy of Management Journal 41(2): 158-178. Sanders, WM. G. and M. A. Carpenter. 2004. The Effects of Top Management Team Pay and Firm Internationalization on MNC Performance. Journal of Management 30(4): 509–528. Sherman, H. D., J. K. Roger, P. J. Maheshkumar. 1998. The effect of the board and executive committee characteristics on the degree of internationalization. Journal of International Management 4: 311-335. Sullivan, D. 1994. Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm. Journal of International Business Studies 25(2): 325-342. Tihanyi, L., A. E. Ellstrand, C. M. Daily and D. R. Dalton. 2000. Composition of the Top Management Team and Firm International Diversification. Journal of Management 26(6): 1157–1177. Uzun, H., S. H. Szewczyk and R. Varma. 2004. Board Composition and Corporate Fraud. Financial Analysts Journal 60(3): 33-43. Wiersema, M. F. and H. P. Bowen. 2008. Corporate diversification: the impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification. Strategic Management 29(2): 115–132. Zahra, S. A. 2003. International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: the effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing 18(4): 495–512. Zahra, S., D. Neubaum and M. Huse. 1997. The effect of the environment on the firm’s export intensity. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 22 (1): 25 – 46. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17878 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討企業董事會之獨立性對於美國企業國際化之影響。國際化可以替公司創造財富增加資本,是公司長遠發展必須面對的選擇。獨立董事的扮演的監督角色以及專業知識,可以為公司的國際化策略提供幫助。而自2001年安隆案爆發而後公司倒閉,獨立董事以及董事會之獨立性成為投資人關注的焦點,之後更在美國引起一系列關於獨立董事之法案修正。獨立董事之法案修正創造由外部力量影響董事會結構,本研究利用這一系列法案修正設立變數以排除董事會之獨立性與企業國際化之間的可能存在之內生性問題。在衡量企業國際化之程度則是採用國外銷售比率、國外資產比率、海外子公司分布比率以及前述三項加總。
研究發現,以海外銷售比率來衡量企業國際化程度,受到法規變動而提升董事會獨立性之公司會降低企業國際化程度。以國外資產比率、海外子公司分布比率以及加總項目來衡量企業國際化程度時,受到法規變動而提升董事會獨立性之公司之企業國際化程度和董事會獨立性之間均無顯著關係存在,亦即董事會獨立性與企業國際化程度並無顯著因果關係。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study uses U.S. firms as the sample to analyze the association between board independence and firm’s internationalization. We use foreign sales ratio, foreign asset ratio, geographic dispersion, and degree of internationalization as the measures for internationalization and employ the change in board independence regulation after 2001 as the exogenous shock on board composition. We partition the full sample into the compliance group, in which the firms already comply the board independence regulation and have more than 50% of independent directors on the board in 2000, and the non-compliance group, in which firms have less than 50% of independent directors on the board in 2000 but after the regulatory change, have more than 50% of independent directors on the board (since 2005). We then use difference-in-difference research design to examine whether board independence has any impact on corporate internationalization.
We find that board independence continuously rises for both the compliance and non-compliance groups since 1997. In our empirical results, when foreign sales ratio is used as the measure for internationalization, the decline in internationalization is more pronounced for non-compliance firms than for compliance firms. Using foreign asset ratio, geographic dispersion, and the degree of internationalization as the measure for internationalization, we find no statistically significant relation between internationalization and board independence. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:45:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02722018-1.pdf: 465604 bytes, checksum: aba93e3794a1c66a4d96ec7ce9720307 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書…………………………………………………………………………………………………………i
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………ii Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………iii Figure Index………………………………………………………………………………………………………………iv Table Index…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………v 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 2. Literature Review…………………………………………………………………………………………8 2.1 Internationalization………………………………………………………………………………8 2.2 Internationalization and Consequence……………………………………9 2.2.1 Internationalization and Firm Performance…………………9 2.2.2 Internationalization and Other Consequences……………10 2.3 The Determinants of Internationalization…………………………10 2.3.1 Corporate Governance and Internationalization………11 2.4 Board of Director and Board Independence…………………………12 2.4.1 The Function of Board of Director………………………………………12 2.4.2 The Effect of Board Independence…………………………………………12 2.5 Prior study on board independence and internationalization…………………………………………………………………………………………15 2.6 Regulation of Board Independence………………………………………………15 3. Hypothesis Development……………………………………………………………………………17 4. Research Design………………………………………………………………………………………………20 4.1 Measurement of the degree of internationalization…20 4.2 Measurement of board independence……………………………………………21 4.3 Empirical models…………………………………………………………………………………………21 5. Empirical Results…………………………………………………………………………………………24 5.1 Sample……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………24 5.2 Descriptive Analysis………………………………………………………………………………25 5.3 Empirical Test and Result…………………………………………………………………26 6. Conclusion and Limitation……………………………………………………………………29 Reference………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………33 Appendix 1……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………40 Appendix 2……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………42 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 董事會獨立性對企業國際化程度影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Board Independence and Internationalization | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許文馨(Wen-Hsin Hsu),謝佳純(Chia-Chun Hsieh) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 公司治理,獨立董事,董事會獨立性,國際化程度,差異中的差異估計法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Corporate Governance,Independent Director,Board Independence,Internationalization,Difference-in-Difference Approach, | en |
dc.relation.page | 54 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-04 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 454.69 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。