請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17756
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林裕彬 | |
dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Ping Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林子平 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T00:43:04Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Alonso, D., & Sole, R. V. (2000). The DivGame simulator: a stochastic cellular automata model of rainforest dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 133(1), 131-141.
2. Arabi, M., Govindaraju, R. S., & Hantush, M. M. (2007). A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices. Journal of Hydrology, 333(2), 459-471. 3. Arbind, K. V., & Madan, K. J. (2012). Evaluation of ArcSWAT Model for Streamflow Simulation. 4. Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998). Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development1: Wiley Online Library. 5. Balling, R. J., Taber, J. T., Brown, M. R., & Day, K. (1999). Multiobjective urban planning using genetic algorithm. Journal of urban planning and development, 125(2), 86-99. 6. Balzter, H., Braun, P. W., & Köhler, W. (1998). Cellular automata models for vegetation dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 107(2), 113-125. 7. Bergstrom, S. (1976). Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchments. 8. Beven, K., & Binley, A. (1992). The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological processes, 6(3), 279-298. 9. Beven, K., & Kirkby, M. (1979). A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/Un modèle à base physique de zone d'appel variable de l'hydrologie du bassin versant. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 24(1), 43-69. 10. Briassoulis, H. (2000). Analysis of land use change: theoretical and modeling approaches. 11. Castella, J.-C., & Verburg, P. H. (2007). Combination of process-oriented and pattern-oriented models of land-use change in a mountain area of Vietnam. Ecological Modelling, 202(3), 410-420. 12. Chu, H. J., Lin, Y. P., Huang, C. W., Hsu, C. Y., & Chen, H. Y. (2010). Modelling the hydrologic effects of dynamic land‐use change using a distributed hydrologic model and a spatial land‐use allocation model. Hydrological processes, 24(18), 2538-2554. 13. Di Luzio, M., Srinivasan, R., & Arnold, J. G. (2004). A GIS‐coupled hydrological model system for the watershed assessment of agricultural nonpoint and point sources of pollution. Transactions in GIS, 8(1), 113-136. 14. Dotto, C. B., Mannina, G., Kleidorfer, M., Vezzaro, L., Henrichs, M., McCarthy, D. T., . . . Deletic, A. (2012). Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling. water research, 46(8), 2545-2558. 15. Feldman, A. D. (2000). Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS: technical reference manual: US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. 16. Fohrer, N., Möller, D., & Steiner, N. (2002). An interdisciplinary modelling approach to evaluate the effects of land use change. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 27(9), 655-662. 17. Fowler, H., Kilsby, C., & Stunell, J. (2007). Modelling the impacts of projected future climate change on water resources in north-west England. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11(3), 1115-1126. 18. Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., & Arnold, J. G. (2007). Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions, The. 19. Gebre, S., & Ludwig, F. (2015). Hydrological Response to Climate Change of the Upper Blue Nile River Basin: Based on IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). J Climatol Weather Forecasting, 3(121), 2. 20. Guse, B., Reusser, D. E., & Fohrer, N. (2014). How to improve the representation of hydrological processes in SWAT for a lowland catchment–temporal analysis of parameter sensitivity and model performance. Hydrological processes, 28(4), 2651-2670. 21. Haith, D. A., & Shoenaker, L. L. (1987). Generalized Watershed Loading Functions for Stream Flow Nutrients1: Wiley Online Library. 22. Hall, C., Tian, H., Qi, Y., Pontius, G., & Cornell, J. (1995). Modelling spatial and temporal patterns of tropical land use change. Journal of Biogeography, 753-757. 23. Hargreaves, G. L., Hargreaves, G. H., & Riley, J. P. (1985). Agricultural benefits for Senegal River basin. Journal of irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 111(2), 113-124. 24. Hundecha, Y., & Bárdossy, A. (2004). Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model. Journal of Hydrology, 292(1), 281-295. 25. Izaurralde, R., Williams, J. R., McGill, W. B., Rosenberg, N. J., & Jakas, M. Q. (2006). Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: Model description and testing against long-term data. Ecological Modelling, 192(3), 362-384. 26. Kilsby, C., Jones, P., Burton, A., Ford, A., Fowler, H., Harpham, C., . . . Wilby, R. (2007). A daily weather generator for use in climate change studies. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(12), 1705-1719. 27. Knisel, W. G. (1980). CREAMS: A field-scale model for chemicals, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems. USDA Conservation Research Report(26). 28. Knisel, W. G. (1993). GLEAMS: Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems: Version 2.10: University of Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Bio. & Ag. Engineering. 29. Kok, K., & Veldkamp, A. (2001). Evaluating impact of spatial scales on land use pattern analysis in Central America. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 85(1), 205-221. 30. Lin, Y.-P., Verburg, P. H., Chang, C.-R., Chen, H.-Y., & Chen, M.-H. (2009). Developing and comparing optimal and empirical land-use models for the development of an urbanized watershed forest in Taiwan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92(3), 242-254. 31. Luo, G., Yin, C., Chen, X., Xu, W., & Lu, L. (2010). Combining system dynamic model and CLUE-S model to improve land use scenario analyses at regional scale: A case study of Sangong watershed in Xinjiang, China. Ecological Complexity, 7(2), 198-207. 32. Monteith, J. (1965). Evaporation and environment. Paper presented at the Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 33. Neitsch, S., Arnold, J., Kiniry, J., Williams, J., & King, K. (2002). Soil and Water Assessment Tool (Version 2000)—theoretical documentation. College Station, TX, Texas Water Research Institute. 34. Niehoff, D., Fritsch, U., & Bronstert, A. (2002). Land-use impacts on storm-runoff generation: scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. Journal of Hydrology, 267(1), 80-93. 35. Ojima, D. (2005). Global land project: Science plan and implementation strategy: IGBP Secretariat. 36. Overmars, K. P., & Verburg, P. H. (2006). Multilevel modelling of land use from field to village level in the Philippines. Agricultural systems, 89(2), 435-456. 37. Overmars, K. P., & Verburg, P. H. (2007). Comparison of a deductive and an inductive approach to specify land suitability in a spatially explicit land use model. Land use policy, 24(3), 584-599. 38. Park, J., Park, M., Joh, H., Shin, H., Kwon, H., Srinivasan, R., & Kim, S. (2011). Assessment of MIROC 3. 2 HiRes climate and CLUE-s land use change impacts on watershed hydrology using SWAT. Transactions of the ASABE, 54(5), 1713-1724. 39. Parker, D. C., Manson, S. M., Janssen, M. A., Hoffmann, M. J., & Deadman, P. (2003). Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Annals of the association of American Geographers, 93(2), 314-337. 40. Priestley, C., & Taylor, R. (1972). On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly weather review, 100(2), 81-92. 41. Racsko, P., Szeidl, L., & Semenov, M. (1991). A serial approach to local stochastic weather models. Ecological Modelling, 57(1), 27-41. 42. Refshaard, J., Storm, B., & Singh, V. (1995). MIKE SHE. Computer models of watershed hydrology., 809-846. 43. Richardson, C. W. (1981). Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation. Water Resources Research, 17(1), 182-190. 44. Selker, J. S., & Haith, D. A. (1990). Development and Testing of Single‐Parameter Precipitation Distributions. Water Resources Research, 26(11), 2733-2740. 45. Semenov, M. A., Brooks, R. J., Barrow, E. M., & Richardson, C. W. (1998). Comparison of the WGEN and LARS-WG stochastic weather generators for diverse climates. Climate research, 10(2), 95-107. 46. Shirmohammadi, A., Chaubey, I., Harmel, R., Bosch, D., Muñoz-Carpena, R., Dharmasri, C., . . . Frankenberger, J. (2006). Uncertainty in TMDL models. 47. Southworth, F., Dale, V. H., & Oneill, R. (1991). CONTRASTING PATTERNS OF LAND-USE IN RONDONIA, BRAZIL-SIMULATING THE EFFECTS ON CARBON RELEASE. International Social Science Journal, 43(4), 681-698. 48. Tung, C.-P., & Haith, D. A. (1995). Global-warming effects on New York streamflows. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 121(2), 216-225. 49. Turner, B. L., Skole, D., Sanderson, S., Fischer, G., Fresco, L., & Leemans, R. (1995). Land-use and land-cover change. Science/Research Plan. Global Change Report (Sweden). 50. Van Griensven, A., & Bauwens, W. (2003). Multiobjective autocalibration for semidistributed water quality models. Water Resources Research, 39(12). 51. Veldkamp, A., & Fresco, L. (1996). CLUE: a conceptual model to study the conversion of land use and its effects. Ecological Modelling, 85(2), 253-270. 52. Veldkamp, A., & Verburg, P. (2004). Modelling land use change and environmental impact. Journal of Environmental Management, 72(1), 1-3. 53. Verburg, P. H., Eickhout, B., & van Meijl, H. (2008). A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use. The Annals of Regional Science, 42(1), 57-77. 54. Verburg, P. H., & Overmars, K. P. (2009). Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling: exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model. Landscape ecology, 24(9), 1167-1181. 55. Verburg, P. H., Schot, P. P., Dijst, M. J., & Veldkamp, A. (2004). Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal, 61(4), 309-324. 56. Verburg, P. H., Soepboer, W., Veldkamp, A., Limpiada, R., Espaldon, V., & Mastura, S. S. (2002). Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model. Environmental Management, 30(3), 391-405. 57. Verburg, P. H., & van Keulen, H. (1999). Exploring changes in the spatial distribution of livestock in China. Agricultural systems, 62(1), 51-67. 58. Yang, J., Reichert, P., Abbaspour, K., Xia, J., & Yang, H. (2008). Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China. Journal of Hydrology, 358(1), 1-23. 59. Zhou, F., Xu, Y., Chen, Y., Xu, C.-Y., Gao, Y., & Du, J. (2013). Hydrological response to urbanization at different spatio-temporal scales simulated by coupling of CLUE-S and the SWAT model in the Yangtze River Delta region. Journal of Hydrology, 485, 113-125. 60. 方琮雅. (2001). 桃園臺地水域用地空間結構變遷之研究, 臺灣大學農業工程學研究所碩士論文. 61. 王中根, 刘昌明, & 黄友波. (2003). SW AT 模型的原理, 结构及应用研究. 地理科学进展, 22(1), 79-861. 62. 王彥覃. (2008). 應用自上而下與自下而上土地利用及降雨-逕流模式模擬土地利用變遷與水文量-以寶橋集水區為例. 臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所學位論文, 1-109. 63. 史朗祺. (2013). 氣候變遷對都市雨水利用之影響-以斯尼蘭卡哥倫坡市及臺灣臺北市作對比研究. 64. 永續公共工程委員會. http://eem.pcc.gov.tw/node/187. 65. 吳志剛. (2000). 國立成功大學水利與海洋工程研究所碩士論文. 66. 吳佩蓉. (2008). 整合土地利用模式與水文模式於集水區景觀生態規劃管理. 臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所學位論文, 1-96. 67. 吳幸娟. (2014). 應用土地利用變遷模式與水文模式分析氣候變遷下水文通量之變化; Application of Land Use Changes Model and Hydrological Model to Analyze the Impact of Hydrological Fluxes of Climate Change. 68. 吳振發. (2006). 土地利用變遷與景觀生態評估方法之建立: 國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所博士論文. 69. 吳振發. (2011). 臺灣鄉村景觀變遷模擬之 CLUE-s 模式最佳參數試驗. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE, 62, 103-125. 70. 呂仲耿. (2002). 利用空間資訊探討水源涵養保安林地景變遷. 71. 李克里. (2013). 氣候變遷與土地利用變遷對集水區流量衝擊評估-以聖文森蒙特婁集水區為例; EFFECTS OF CLIMATE AND LAND USE CHANGE ON THE STREAMFLOW IN THE MONTREAL WATERSHED, ST. VINCENT. 72. 李胜, & 梁忠民. (2006). GLUE 方法分析新安江模型参数不确定性的应用研究. 东北水利水电, 24(2), 31-33. 73. 汪靜明, 國立臺灣師範大學, 環境保護中心, & 淡水文化基金會. (2003). 全國生態工法博覽會: 大屯溪生態工法教育研討會論文集. 2003 年: 臺灣師範大學環境保護中心. 74. 林峰田, 林士弘, 李萬凱, 孫志鴻, 林建元, & 李培芬. (2002). 宮格自動機於土地利用變遷模擬之結合機制. 中華地理資訊學會學術研討會學術論文集, B-16, 光碟版. 75. 林裕彬, 吳振發, & 鄧東波. (2004). 景觀生態面指數分析汐止地區 1990~ 2001 年土地利用時空間鑲嵌特徵. Journal of City and Planning, 31(3), 239-268. 76. 施恆益. (2013). 應用概似不確定性估計 (GLUE) 於集水區營養鹽總最大日負荷規劃. 77. 洪念民. (1997). 氣候變遷對大安溪水資源營運之影響, 國立臺灣大學農業工程學系所碩士論文. 78. 徐美玲. (2004). 行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告: 臺灣山坡地環境敏感區土地利用變遷及其對環境衝擊之研究─ 子計畫二: 集水區土地利用變遷對河川水文的影響 (III). 79. 梁靜宜. (2010). 宜蘭縣壯圍鄉土地利用變遷預測模式之研究. 逢甲大學土地管理學系碩士論文. 80. 連宛渝. (2013). 氣象合成與水文模式之發展及因應氣候變遷之供水系統調適能力建構. 臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所學位論文, 1-280. 81. 陳正達. (2013). 利用臺灣長期氣候資料建立本土氣候變遷分析與推估方法. 交通部中央氣象局. 82. 陳虹螢. (2010). 整合土地利用與水文模式於集水區規劃管理之研究-以臺北都會區為例. 臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所學位論文, 1-111. 83. 陳琦玲, 漆匡時, & 林正錺. (1991). 氣象預測模式之測試分析. 中華農業研究, 40(3), 351-363. 84. 陳憲宗, 曾宏偉, 林錦源, 楊道昌, & 游保杉. (2011). 氣候變遷情境下曾文水庫集水區水文乾旱特性推估. 農業工程學報, 57(3), 44-60. 85. 黃鉅友. (2013). 快速道路建設對鄉村地區發展累積性影響評估-以南投縣草屯鎮為例. 86. 黃誌川, 高樹基, 郭鎮維, & 李宗祐. (2007). 地形指數模式在臺灣北部山地集水區降雨逕流之模擬. 地理研究. 87. 童慶彬, 林嘉佑. (2015). IPCC提供RCP情境中適合台灣GCM之挑選. 氣候變遷調適科技整合研究計畫-跨領域脆弱度評估與回復力建構科技發展計畫. 88. 楊道昌、游保杉. (1997). 目標函數對連續型降雨–逕流模式率定之影響. 臺灣水利,第45卷,第4期, 第66–73頁. 89. 經濟部水利規劃試驗所. (2009). 強化高屏溪流域水資源供水系統因應氣候變遷之調適能力. 90. 經濟部水利署北區水資源局. (2008). 陽明山地區水資源現況調查之研究. 91. 廖怡雯. (2003). 運用馬可夫鏈模式於臺中市土地利用變遷之研究, 逢甲大學土地管理所碩士論文. 92. 趙紀翔. (2012). 氣候變遷對蘭陽溪流域影響評估. 93. 蕭戎雯. (2013). 不同單元尺度對土地利用及生態系統服務模擬之影響-以大屯溪流域為例. 臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所學位論文, 1-126. 94. 韓宛容. (2012). 應用氣候統計降尺度預報資料推估石門水庫入流量; Apply Statistical-Downscaling Climate Forecasts for Estimating Shihmen Reservoir Inflows. 95. 羅時麒. (2005). 以系統性機率模式鑑定量化與整合生命週期評估之不確定性. 96. 顧嘉安. (2010). 以馬可夫鍊細胞自動機模型模擬極端洪水對都市土地利用型態之影響─ 以臺北市為例. 成功大學都市計劃學系學位論文, 1-112. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17756 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 氣候變遷對全球水文循環有不同程度的衝擊影響,而臺灣於2014年陸續進行第五次耦合模式比較計畫之研究,提出各大氣環流模式之氣候不確定性與氣候所造成之衝擊。由於地勢陡峭促使地表逕流快速地流入海洋、乾濕季節雨量極端的現象以及氣候變遷的情況下,臺灣對於水資源的管理難關重重,因此,需要及早進行分析並做好應變措施。
本研究的目的為,評估臺灣較小集水區域之未來土地利用改變與氣候變遷情形下,對於流量造成的衝擊。於氣候變遷方面,採用IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)第五次評估報告(AR5)下5個大氣環流模式(General Circulation Model, GCM)輸出的資料,並做時間降尺度至日時間單位,以作為後續SWAT水文模式輸入端資料使用;而在土地利用變遷方面,採用CLUE‐s(the Conservation of Land Use and its Effects at Small regional extent)模式模擬出近未來2020年至2039年之土地利用分布情形;最後,結合氣候變遷與土地利用模式之輸出結果,輸入至SWAT 水文模式(Soil and Water Assessment Tool model)中,模擬出近未來年之流量情形,並進行分析與建議。此外,模式參數會隨著季節、氣候及空間的變化,對模式預測之結果有極大的影響,因此,本研究在率定之前,先採用不確定性估計(Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation, GLUE)方法進行SWAT水文模式參數的選取。 在近未來內,土地利用模式結果顯示林地(+1.2%)及都市(+36.8%)都將增加,農地(-15.6%)及其他類別土地(15%)將減少;大氣環流模式結果顯示總降雨量有減少的情形,並在豐水季節增加降雨(+1.44%),枯水季節減少降雨(-3.41%)。除此之外,於土地利用改變、氣候變遷、氣候變遷下土地利用改變等三種情境下之結果顯示,土地利用僅略微影響著流量,雨量才是影響流量的最大因素,導致氣候變遷情境與氣候變遷下土地利用改變情境之結果相似,由兩者情境結果發現,豐水期間7、8月份之流量上升,僅10月份流量減少幅度較大,但整體豐水季節流量是略為增加的(+0.12%);而於枯水期間3、4月份之流量是減少的,整體枯水季節也呈現減少的趨勢(-5.35%),造成豐枯水季節之流量有呈現更明顯之狀況,且加上年平均流量為減少的情形,此一結果可能造成近未來年缺水相關問題的發生。此外,本研究發現研究區域內之流量趨勢可能有往前遷移的情形發生,因高流量月份由原本9、10、11月份變為8、9、10月份,而本研究認定此一原因為雨量改變所造成的。 根據結果顯示,管理未來水資源將會是一項嚴峻的挑戰,因此,氣候變遷與土地利用變化對大屯溪水資源帶來的影響,應及早規劃以應變未來的不確定性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Climate change projects have various levels of impacts on hydrological cycles around the world. The impact of climate change and uncertainty of climate projections from general circulation models (GCMs) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) which has been just be released in Taiwan, 2014. Since the streamflow run into ocean directly due to the steep terrain and the rainfall difference between wet and dry seasons is apparent; as a result, the allocation water resource reasonable is very challenge in Taiwan, particularly under climate change. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impacts of climate and land use changes on a small watershed in Taiwan. The AR5 General Circulation Models(GCM) output data was adopted in this study and was downscaled from the monthly to the daily weather data as the input data of hydrological model such as Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model in this study. The spatially explicit land uses change model, the Conservation of Land Use and its Effects at Small regional extent (CLUE‐s), was applied to simulate land use scenarios in 2020-2039. Combined climate and land use change scenarios were adopted as input data of the hydrological model, the SWAT model, to estimate the future streamflows. In addition, the model parameters with the variation of seasons, weather, and spaces will have an extremely influence of the model prediction. Therefore, this study applies the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation(GLUE) methods to choose SWAT model parameters before calibration. In recent year, CLUE-s model showed the increasing forest(+1.2%) and urban(+36.8%) area, and decreasing agricultural(-15.6%) and others land(-15%); GCMs model showed the decreasing annual precipitation, increasing rainfall in wet season(+1.44%) and decreasing rainfall in dry season(-3.41%). Besides, this study had three scenario: land use change, climate change and both of land use change and climate change. SWAT model showed land use didn’t influence streamflow very much in the land use change scenario, rainfall is the main reason for streamflow. Therefore, there were similar results between climate change scenario and both of land use change and climate change scenario, and both scenario showed the increasing streamflow in July and August, much decreasing streamflow in March, April and October, little increasing streamflow on wet seasons(+0.12%), decreasing streamflow on dry season(-5.35%). Cause the difference of streamflow between wet season and dry season are also increased, and decreasing annual streamflow. It will cause the problem of water shortage in the future. In addition, the study found the high streamflow will change from month 9-11 to month 8-10 in Datuan river, and it is because of rainfall. This result indicates a more stringent challenge on the water resource management in future. Therefore, impacts on water resource caused by climate change and land use change should be considered in water resource planning for the Datuan river watershed. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:43:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02622032-1.pdf: 8688598 bytes, checksum: 5ca8410e364af4cbda8fa6802d1e7023 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 I
中文摘要 II 英文摘要 IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 VIII 表目錄 X 第一章 前言 1 1.1 背景說明 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2.1 土地利用變遷與模擬 6 2.1.1 土地利用變遷 6 2.1.2 土地利用變遷模式 7 2.2 氣候變遷對流量之影響 10 2.3 不確定性分析 14 2.3.1 不確定性分析方法與來源 14 2.3.2 概似不確定性估計 15 2.4 水文模式 16 2.4.1 水文模式簡介 16 2.4.2 SWAT模式 17 第三章 研究方法 19 3.1 研究區域 19 3.1.1 大屯溪流域 19 3.1.2 研究河段位置 22 3.2 土地利用模式 (CLUE-S) 24 3.2.1 模式介紹 24 3.2.2 土地利用模擬情境設定 29 3.3 氣候變遷情境 34 3.3.1 氣候變遷情境簡介 34 3.3.2 GCMs模式挑選 35 3.3.3 未來氣象資料產生 36 3.4 參數不確定性估計(GLUE) 40 3.5 水文模式 (SWAT) 42 3.5.1 模式介紹 42 3.5.2 輸入參數資料 45 第四章 結果與討論 52 4.1 土地利用模式 52 4.1.1 驅動力因子 52 4.1.2 土地利用轉變 53 4.2 氣候變遷情境設定 57 4.3 水文模式 69 4.3.1 水文模式之率定驗證 69 4.3.2 流量模擬情形 70 第五章 結論與建議 92 5.1 結論 92 5.2 建議 93 文獻回顧 96 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 土地與氣候變遷情境對流量之影響
-以大屯溪流域為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Impacts of Land Use and Climate Changes Scenarios on Streamflow-A case study of Datuan Watershed | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李明旭,陳彥璋,童慶斌 | |
dc.subject.keyword | SWAT水文模式,氣候變遷模式,CLUE-s模式,流量,水資源衝擊, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | SWAT,GCM,CLUE-s,streamflow,water impact, | en |
dc.relation.page | 102 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物環境系統工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 8.48 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。