不一樣的父母親-身心障礙者的子女的自我認同

Guei-Ying Song; 宋貴英

請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件： http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17450

完整後設資料紀錄

DC 欄位	值	語言
dc.contributor.advisor	林萬億
dc.contributor.author	Guei-Ying Song	en
dc.contributor.author	宋貴英	zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned	2021-06-08T00:13:49Z	-
dc.date.copyright	2013-08-09
dc.date.issued	2013
dc.date.submitted	2013-08-02
dc.identifier.citation	中文部分 Adler, A.（1974）。自卑與生活（葉頌姿譯）。台北：志文。（原著出版於1969年） Adler, A.（2002）。自卑與超越（黃光國譯）。台北：志文。（原著出版於1932年） Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M.（2003）。敘說探究：質性研究中的經驗與故事（蔡敏鈴、余曉雯譯）。台北：心理。（原著出版於2000年） Corssley, M. L. ( 2004 )。敘事心理與研究：自我、創傷與意義的建構（朱儀羚、吳芝儀、蔡欣志、康萃婷、柯嬉慧譯）。台北：濤石文化。（原著出版於2000 年） Giddens, A. ( 2005)。現代性與自我認同（趙旭東、文方譯）。台北：左岸。（原著出版於1991年） Jenks, C.（2004）。文化（俞智敏、陳光達、王淑燕譯）。台北：巨流。（原著出版於1998年） Kleinman, A.（1994）。談病說痛：人類的受苦經驗與痊癒之道（陳新綠譯）。台北：桂冠。（原著出版於1988年） Maslow, A.（1988）。自我實現與人格成熟（劉千美譯）。台北：光啟出版社。（原著出版於1968年） Woodward, k., Kathryn W. (Eds.) (2006)。認同與差異的概念 (林文琪譯)。台北：韋伯文化。（原著出版於1997年） Wallerstein, J.S., Lewis, J. M., & Blakeslee, S. (2002)。父母離婚後—孩子走過的內心路(張美惠譯)。台北：張老師。（原著出版於2001年）丁興祥、賴誠斌（2001）。心理傳記學的展開與應用：典範與方法。應用心理研究， 12，77-106。內政部統計處（2006）。身心障礙者生活需求調查報告。內政部及社會司（2012）。身心障礙鑑定及需求評估新制專區。取自： http://www.topwin.com.tw/moi/system.html。取用日期：2013年2月19日。內政部統計處網站。http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/month/list.htm。取用日期：2013年2 月19日。王藝蓉（1996）。國小教育自我概念制控信念與其對教學論題道德推理的關係。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。王文娟（2000）。「家」對智障者之成年手足之意涵。私立慈濟大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。王國羽（2003）。身心障礙研究概念的演進：論障礙風險的普同特質〉，發表於「台灣社會學會年會學術研討會」。台北：國立政治大學社會學系。王國羽、呂朝賢（2004）。世界衛生組織身心障礙人口定義概念之演進：兼論我國身心障礙人口定義系統問題與未來修正方向。社會政策與社會工作， 8(2):193-235。白博仁（1999）。國小學生的性別角色及其自我概念的關係研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。行政院衛生署「新制身心障礙鑑定專區」（2012）。新制身心障礙鑑定專區。取自： http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2.aspx?now_fod_list_no=12349&class_ no=211&level_no=1。取用日期：2013年2月19日。李弘喆（2004）。身心障礙全球化反思－以樂山療養院為例的歷史結構分析。東吳大學社會學研究所碩士論文。李克翰（2009）。成年肢體障礙者身體形象，自卑感與因應策略之研究。淡江大學教育心理與諮商研究所碩士班學位論文。沈清松 (2000)。呂格爾。東大圖書股份有限公司。吳書昀（2010）。「甜蜜的負荷」外一章：兒童少年家庭照顧者的生活境遇與福利建構。臺大社會工作學刊，第21期，頁153-190。周月清（1998）。身心障礙者福利與家庭社會工作：理論、實務與研究。台北：五南。周文君、周妙純、賴秀雯（2004）。女性精神分裂症患者之青少年子女的行為問題。台灣精神醫學，18（4），291－297。周志玉 (2005)。憂鬱症污名研究：可控制性歸因、危險與依賴刻板印象對歧視行為的影響。中原大學心理學系碩士學位論文。林美玲 (2001)。精神分裂症烙印之生活經驗。國立台灣大學醫學院護理學研究所碩士論文。林麗惠（2007）。自卑經驗探討--以女性成人為例。國立台北教育大學心理與諮商研究所碩士論文。林萬億（2010）。社會福利。台北：五南。邱滿艷（2011）。從身心障礙者權益保障法探討身心障礙者需求與地方政府資源。特殊教育季刊（118），13-23。孫一信（2006）。媒體正在複製閱聽大眾對身心障礙者的歧視。行政院新聞局專新聞妙捕手，媒體觀察。http://www.newscatcher.org.tw/02-list.php?sn=33&type=watch，取用日期：2011年2月19日。孫小玉(2012)。〈失能者的表徵模式、主體論述、與倫理議題〉，「蕪土吾民」： 2012 年文化研究會議。2012 年1 月7、8 日。台北：文化研究學會。胡幼慧、姚美華 (1996)。一些質性方法上的思考。收錄於胡幼慧主編之《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北：巨流。胡幼慧 (1996)。質性研究的分析與寫成。收錄於胡幼慧主編之《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北：巨流。許維素（1992）。家庭組型、家庭氣氛對兒童自卑感、社會興趣、生活型態形成之影響。台灣師範大學心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。許育光（2000）。敘說研究的初步探討—從故事性思考和互為主體的觀點出發。輔導季刊，36(4)，17-26。張春興（1989）。教育心理學辭典。台北：東華。張春興（2001）。現代心裡學。台北：東華。張作貞 (2008)。精神疾病烙印及抗烙印行動之對話。東吳社會工作學報，18，頁135-156。張恆豪、蘇峰山（2009）。戰後台灣國小教科書中的障礙者意象分析。台灣社會學刊，42：143-188。張麗珍（2010）。顏面燒傷者自我認同的轉變歷程。私立東海大學社會工作學所博士論文。郭為藩（1979）。自我心理學。台南：開山。陳向明 (2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北：五南。陳坤虎（2001）。青少年自我認同與父母管教態度及自尊之關係。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。陳惠萍（2003）。常體之外：「殘障」的身體社會學思考。東海大學社會學系碩士論文。陳坤虎、雷庚玲、吳英璋(2005)。不同階段青少年之自我認同內容及危機探索之發展差異。中華心理學刊, 47(3), 249-268. 黃金島（1987）。肢體障礙者之身體形象、自我概念、歸因組型與生活適應間的關係。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。黃德祥（1994）。青少年發展與輔導。台北：五南。黃志成、王麗美（2000）。身心障礙者的福利服務。台北：亞太。黃朗文（2001）。社會情境與青少年自我概念之發展，青少年生命歷程與生活調劑研討會，中研院社會所主辦。黃莉、張錦華（2005）。台灣民眾的身體意象及其預測因子：人際壓力，媒體信任作為中介變項。Chinese Journal of Psychology, 47(3), 269-287。唐宜楨、吳慧菁 (2008)。精神疾患污名化與去污名化之初探。身心障礙研究， 6(3)，頁175-195。葉肅科（2002）。澳洲身心障礙政策：國際比較的光譜，社區發展季刊，第97期，頁271-282。董和銳（2003）。身心障礙之概念架構與社會意涵。身心障礙研究，1(1)，頁32-42。曾翠華（1997）。自發性脊椎側彎青少年的疾病知識、身體形象與自我照顧行為。國立台灣大學護理學研究所碩士論文。楊明蘭（2003）。肢體障礙者之身體知覺與服飾偏好之研究。私立輔仁大學織品服裝學系研究所碩士論文。楊國樞（2004）。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究。本土心理學研究，22，11-80。楊志偉、陳泰瑞、馮文瑋、曾定強、張雅雯 (2005)。常見的疾病污名化之影響。台灣醫學，9(6)，頁814-817。劉仲冬 (1996)。量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向及出路。收錄於胡幼慧主編之《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北：巨流。劉俠（2004）。俠風長流：劉俠回憶錄。台北：九歌。簡春安、鄒平儀 (2004)。社會工作研究法。台北：巨流。藍介洲（2003）。生產與保護－臺北市中、重度視覺障礙者庇護性就業服務之研究。國立臺灣大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。蘇美鳳（2000）。國小六年級學童自卑感與成就動機之關係。國立屏東教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。蘇逸人 (2002)。疾病覺知、疾病控制信念與社會污名：精神分裂症患者疾病心理適應之心理社會因應模式。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。英文部分 Ackerson, B.J. (2003). Coping with the dual demands of severe mental illness and Parenting: the parents' perspective. Families in Society , 84, 109-118. Adler, A. (1939). Social interest. New York：Putnam. Adler, A. (1956). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler：A systematic presentation in selection from his writing. New York：Basic Book. Aldridge, J., & Becker, S. (1999). Children as carers: the impact of parental illness and disability on children's caring roles. Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 303-320. Anderson, S. A., & Sabatelli, R. M. (1990). The differentiation in the family system scale. The American Journal of family therapy, 20(1), 77-100. Armistead, L., Klein, K., & Forehand, R. (1995). Parental physical illness and child functioning. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 409-422. Becker, S., Aldridge, J. & Dearden, C. (1998). Young Carers and Their Families. Oxford: Blackwell. Berenson, K. R., Crawford, T. N., Cohen, P., & Brook, J. (2005). Implications of identification with parents and parents’ acceptance for adolescent and young adult self-esteem. Self and Identity, 4(3), 289－301. Beyers, W. & Çok, F. (2008). Adolescent self and identity development in context. Editorial, Journal of Adolescence, 31, 147-150. Bibby, A. & Becker, S. (Eds.) (2000). Younger Carers in Their Own Words. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. Bickenbach, Jerome, E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E. M., & Ustun, T. B. (1999). Models of Disablement, Universalism and the International Classiﬁcation of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1173-1187. Blasi, A. (1988). Identity and the development of the self. In D. Lapsley & F. C. Power (Eds.), Self, ego, and identity: Integrative approaches. New York: Springer-Verlag. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development, 6 (pp. 187-249). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Buck, F., & Hohmann, G. (1981). Personality, behavior, values, and family relations of children of fathers with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 62, 432-438. Byrne, P. (1997). Psychiatric stigma: past, passing and to come. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 90, 618-620. Chichering, A.W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and Identity. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Cohen, L. (1998). Mothers' perception of the influence of their physical disabilities on the developmental tasks of children. Alameda (CA): California School of Professional Psychology. Colin, B., Oliver, M., & Barton, L. (2002). “Introduction,'In Disability Studies Today, edited by C. Barnes, M. Oliver, and L. Barton. pp. 1-17. Cambridge: Polity Press. Colin, B., & Mercer, G. (2003). Disability. Cambridge: Polity Press. Compas. B.E., Worsham, N.L., Epping, J., JoAnne, E., & Grant, K.E. (1994). When Mom or Dad has cancer: Markers of psychological distress in cancer patients, spouses, and children. Health-Psychology, 13, 507-515. Conley-Jung, C. (1996). The early parenting experiences of mothers with visual impairments and blindness dissertation. Alameda (CA): California School of Professional Psychology. Darling, R.B. (2003). Toward a model of changing disability identities: A proposed typology and research agenda. Disability & Society, 18(7), 881-895. Duvdevany, I., Yahav, R., & Moin, V. (2005). The parental child: Positive and negative feelings of children of disabled parents'. The International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 28 (3), 259-262. Erikson, E. H.(1959). Young man Luther. New York: Faber. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton. Espe-Sherwindt, M., & Crable, S.(1993). Parents with Mental Retardation Moving Beyond the Myths. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13(2),154-174. Finney, J.W., & Miller, K.M. (1999). Children of parents with medical illness. In: Silverman WK, Ollendick TH (editors): Developmental Issues in the Clinical Treatment of Children. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; pp. 433-442. Fisher, S. (1990). Body image: Development, deviance and change. New York: Guiford Press. Fougeyrollas, P., & Beauregard, L. (2001) Disability: an interactive person-environment social creation. In Handbook of Disability Studies. London: Sage. Frank, J. (1995). Couldn’t Care More: A Study of Young Carers and Their Needs. London: The Children’s Society. Gardner, J. M., & Radel, M. (1978). Portrait of the disabled in the media. Journal of Community Psychology, 6, 269-274. Georing, S. (2002). Beyond the medical Model? Disability, formal justice, and the exception for the 'profoundly impaired? Goethals, G.R. , & Frost M. (1978). Value change and the recall of earlier values. Bull Psychonom Soc 11:73-74. Grogan, S. (1999). Body image: Understanding body dissatisfaction in men, woman, and children. New York: Routledge Press. Hahn, H. D., & Belt, T. L. (2004). Disability identity and attitudes toward cure in a sample of disabled activist. Journal of Health and Behavior, 45, 453-464. Harrison, T. C., & Kahn, D. L. (2004). Disability rites: The cultural shift following impairment. Family & Community Health, 27(1), 86-93. Hughes, G. (1998). A Sutiable Case for Treatment？Constructions of Disability. in E. Saraga(ed.), Embodying the SocialConstructions of Difference, pp.43-90. London：Routledge. Hughes, B. (1999). The Constitution of Impairment: Modernity and the Aesthetic of oppression. Disability and Society , 114(2), 155-172. Hendershot, G., Olkin, R., & Abrams, K. (2002). Disabled Parents of Adolescents: Data from the National Health Interview Survey. Conference paper presented at the American Public Health Association meetings in Philadelphia, November 2002. Kinsella, K. B., & Anderson, R. A. (1996). Coping skills, strengths, and needs as perceived by adult. Psychiatric Re-habilitation, 20(2), 24－32. Kirshbaum, M. (1994). Family context and disability culture reframing: Through the Looking Glass. The Family Psychologist, 10 (4), 8-12. Kirshbaum, M. (2000). A disability culture perspective on early intervention with parents with physical or cognitive disabilities and their infants. Infants and Young Children , 132, 9-20. Kirshbaum, M., & Olkin, R. (2002). Parents with physical, systemic or visual disabilities. Sexuality and Disability , 201, 29-52. Keith, L., & Morris, J. (1996). Easy targets: a disability rights perspective on the children as carers' debate. Critical Social Policy , 15, 36-57. Kelley, S.D., & Lambert, SS. (1992). Family support in rehabilitation: A review of research, 1980-1990. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 36, 98-119. Kelley, S.D., Sikka, A., & Venkatesan, S. (1997). A review of research on parental disability: implications for research and counseling practice. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 41, 105-121. Korneluk, Y.G., & Lee, C.M. (1998). Children's adjustment to parental physical illness. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1, 179-193. Kroger, J. (2004). Identity in Adolescence: The Balance Between Self and Other. New York: Routledge. La Plante, M. (1991). Disability in the family. Conference paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Atlanta, GA, November 1991. Lloyd, M. (2001) The Politics of Disability and Feminism: Discord or Synthesis? Sociology 35(3):715-728. Llewellyn. G. (1990). People with intellectual disability as parents: Perspectives from the professional literature. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 164, 369-380. Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in Adolescence. In Adeslon, J. (Ed), Handbook of Adolescence. Matsueda, & Ross, L. (2006). “Criminological Implications of the Thought of George Herbert Mead.” Pp. 77-108 in Sociological Theory and Criminological Research: Views from Europe and the United States, edited by Mathieu Deflem. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science. Mayall, B. (1994). Negotiating Health: Primary School Children at Home and School. London: Cassell. Mazur, E. (2006). Positive and negative events experienced by parents with acquired physical disabilities and their adolescent children. Families, Systems and Health, Sum 2006, 242, 160-178. McNeil, J. (1993). Americans with disabilities: 1991-92. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, P70-33. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Mead, G. H.. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Metzing-Blau, S. & Schnepp, W. (2008). Young carers in Germany: to live on as normal as possible – a grounded theory study. BMC Nursing, 7, 15. Michelle, F., & Adrienne, A. (1988). Disability Beyond Stigma: Social Interaction, Discrimination, and Activism. Journal of Social Issues,44(1), 3-21. Morris, J. (1991). Pride against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability: A Personal Politics of Disability. London: The Women's Press. Murphy, R. E., Schcer, J., Murphy, Y., & Mack, R. (1988). Physical disability and social liminality. A study in the riturals of adversity. Social Science and Medicine, 26,235-242. Murphy, J.W. (2005). Social Norms and Their Implications for Disability. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 4(1/2), 153-163. Newman, T. (2003). Children of Disabled Parents: New Thinking about Families Affected by Disability and Illness. Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing. Newman, T. (2005). Parents, disability and illness: The impact on children. In: Newma, T., Wates, M. editors. Disabled Parents and Their Children: Building a Better Future – A Discussion Document. Ilford, England: Barnardo Press. Oliver, M. (1986). Social Policy and Disability: Some Theoretical Issues. Disability, Handicap, and Society , 1(1), 5-17. Oliver, M. (1990). T The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach. NY: St. Martin’s Press, Inc Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (1998). Disabled people and social policy. London: Longman. Olsen, R. (1996). Young carers: Challenging the facts and politics of research into children and caring. Disability and Society, 111, 41-54. Olsen, R., & Parker, G. (1997). A response to Aldindge and Baker – disability rights and the denial of young carers: the dangers of zero-sum arguments. Critical Social Policy , 17, 125-133. Olkin, R., Abrams, K., Preston, P., Kirshbaum, M. (2006). Comparison of parents with and without disabilities raising teens: Information from the NHIS and two national surveys. Rehabilitation Psychology , 511, 43-49. Patterson, J., & Witten, B. (1987). Myths concerning persons with disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 18, 42-44. Preston, P. (1994). Mother Father Deaf: Living between Sound and Silence. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Preston, P. (2005). Children of Disabled Parents. In G. L. Albrecht (Ed.) Encyclopedia on Disability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Pruzinsky, T., & Cash , T. F. (1990). Integrative themes in body-image development, deviance, and change. In T. Cash and T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: development, deviance and Change (pp.337-349). New York: Guiford Press Rintala, D., Herson, L., & Hudler-Hull, T. (2000). Comparison of parenting styles of persons with and without spinal cord injury and their children's social competence and behavior problems. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 23, 244-256. Rolland, J.S. (1987).Chronic illness and the life cycle: A conceptual framework. Family Process, 26 , 203-221. Schultheiss, D. P., & Blustein, D. L. (1994). Contributions of family relationship factors to the identity formation process. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 159–166. Shakespeare, T. (1996). Disability, identity and difference. In G. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Exploring the divide: Illness and disability (pp. 94-113). Leeds, UK: Disability Press. Shapiro, H. L. (2006). A dominating imaginary friend, cruelty to animals, social withdrawal, and growth deficiency in a 7-year-old girl with parents with schizophrenia. Development and Behavioral pediatrics, 27(3), 231－236. Sivers, A. (1998). Formal Justice. In Silvers, A., Wasserman, D. & Mahowald, M., Disability, Difference, and Discrimination, 13-145. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Sidhu, K. K. (2000). Second generation Skih adolescent males: A ground theory model of self and identity construction. (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, 2000). Stone, S.D. (1995). The myth of bodily perfection. Disability ＆ Society, 10(4), 413-424. Swain, J., & French, S. (2000). Toward an affirmation model of disability. Disability & Society, 15(4), 569-582. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening life events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. American Psychologist, 38, 1161－1173. Thompson, J. K. (1990). Body image disturbance: Assessment and treatment. New York: Pergamo. Thomas, C. (1997). The baby and the bath water: disabled women and motherhood in social context. Sociology of Health & Illness, 19(5): 622–643. Toms Barker, L., Maralani, V. (1997). Challenges and strategies of disabled parents: Findings from a national survey of parents with disabilities. Through the Looking Glass, Berkeley, CA. Technical Report, NIDRR Research and Training Center on Families of Adults with Disabilities Grant No. H133B30076. Tymchuk, A. (1992). Predicting adequacy of parenting by people with mental retardation. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 165-178. Willems, D. L., De Vries, J.N., Isarin, J., & Reinders, J. S. (2007) Parenting by persons with intellectual disability: an explor¬ative study in the Netherlands. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51, 537–544. Waterman, A. S. (1981). Identity Development from Adolescence to Adulthood: An extension of Theory and a Review of Research. Development Psychology, 18, 341-358. Winton, C. (2003). Children as Caregivers: Parental and Parentified Children. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Press. Wells, M., Jones, R. (2000). Childhood parentification and shame-proneness: a preliminary study. American Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 19–27. World Health Organization(2001). Internatinal of functioning, disability and health: ICF (No. 11502088). NLM classification: W15. Yahav, R. (2001). Separation-individuation process in adolescents with sick parents [in Hebrew]. Sichot 96:219–228. Zola, I. K. (1989). Toward the Necessary Universalizing of a Disability Policy. The Milbank Quarterly, 67 (Suppl. 2, Part 2), 401-428. Zola, I. K. (1993). Disability Statistics, What We Count and What It Tells Us: A Personal and political Analysis. Disability Policy Studies, 4(3), 9-39. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1993 Survey of Income and Program Participation SIPP U.S. Bureau of the Census: Washington, D.C.
dc.identifier.uri	http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17450	-
dc.description.abstract	過往有關身心障礙的研究大多偏重於障礙者本身或其家人的適應問題，然而，身心障礙者的子女的身心困境、需求和自我認同的過程卻常被忽略。本研究欲了解身心障礙者的子女如何看待父母親的障礙，過往的生活經驗為何？而父母親的障礙如何影響子女定義與看待自我，以及障礙者的子女如何從他人的眼中了解其自身，並為自己下定義與了解其在社會的位置，又如何影響子女的自我認同。本研究為探索性的研究，採取質性研究的深度訪談法，透過立意抽樣的方式，共訪談6位受訪者，年齡介於18至30歲之間，男女比例各半。受訪者的父親或母親成為身心障礙者的時間皆超過25年以上，其中受訪者的父或母親障礙為肢體障礙有三名，兩名為精神障礙者，一名為雙親皆為聽語障者。本研究採取敘事心理的眼光，來探索與瞭解身心障礙者的子女在這些特殊的社會脈絡之下，是如何建構其認同內涵的，並透過這樣的故事敘說，以一種回顧的眼光，將豐厚個人的生命故事呈現，一方面了解關於身心障礙者的子女在認同歷程上所經歷的經驗與意義，另一方面幫助說敘說故事者確認其生命意義。研究發現身心障礙的子女的生活經驗有其共通性：（一）子女對家庭的承擔與照顧責任較多、（二）逃避不了的眼光、（三）「異樣」的經驗、（四）男女朋友交往及婚姻的考量不同、（五）父母的高期待、自我的要求與補償性競爭心理。在自我認同發展歷程中，身障者的子女在面對身心障礙父母時主要經歷三個階段：感受不一樣、忍受或適應異樣眼光、接受特殊及發展自我，其中部分受訪者產生自卑與烙印感受，每一個階段的轉變都是來自於不同的影響因素。而在因應方式部份，部分受訪者選擇消極態度，表示生活就是這樣子，宿命的被決定，有的受訪者則正常的看待父母是身心障礙者的狀況，認為無明顯差異感受。根據研究結論，本研究在社會福利政策面、社會工作實務與社會工作研究方面提出反省與建議。	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract	The past studies on the disabled usually focus on the adaptation of the disabled individuals and their family. However, the predicaments, needs and process of self-identity of the children of parents with disabilities are often neglected. This study seeks to explore how children of parents with disabilities view the disabilities of their parents, what have their past life experiences been, how the disabilities of the parents influence the children’s definition and treatment of their self, how the children of parents with disabilities understand themselves from the eyes of others and define and understand their social position, and how this in turn influences the children’s self-identity. This study is an exploratory study using an in-depth interview approach in qualitative research methodology and selects six interviewees (including three males and three females) at the age of 18 to 30 years by purposive sampling. The time for which one of the parents of the interviewees is disabled all exceeds 25 years, wherein three interviewees’ parent is physically disability, two’s mentally disability, and one’s both parents are speaking and hearing disabilities. The study explores how the children of parents with disabilities construct their identity in the special social context from the perspective of narrative psychology. Such narrative enriches the presentation of personal life stories in a retrospective view, which in one way helps the children of parents with disabilities understand the experiences in their identity process and meanings thereof and in another helps the narrator confirm the meaning of life. The study finds that the life experiences of the children of parents with disabilities have the following in common: (1) children assuming more responsibility and taking more care of the family; (2) inescapable judgment of other people; (3) the experience of feeling “abnormal;” (4) different concerns in making boyfriend and girlfriend and in marriage; and (5) parents’ high expectations, self-requirements and compensatory rivalry effect. In the course of developing self-identity, the children of parents with disabilities mainly experience three stages: feeling, tolerating or adapting to peculiar looks on others’ faces; accepting the particularity; and developing the self, wherein some interviewees feel inferiority and stigma, and the transformation of each stage results from different influencing factors. As for coping strategies, some interviewees choose a passive attitude and determinism, saying that life is just like this, while some interviewees treat the situation of parents being physically and mentally disabilities in a normal way, feeling no significant differences. Based on the conclusions, the study provides reflection and suggestions for social welfare policies, social work practice and social work research.	en
dc.description.provenance	Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:13:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R96330005-1.pdf: 1846762 bytes, checksum: ab5eec27cecfb6f493c6d60ae3ccd0f1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013	en
dc.description.tableofcontents	口試委員會審定書………………………………………………… i 中文摘要…………………………………………………………… ii 英文摘要…………………………………………………………… iii 第一章緒論………………………………………………………… 1 第一節研究緣起……………………………………………… 1 第二節研究目的……………………………………………… 6 第二章文獻回顧…………………………………………………… 8 第一節身心障礙者與其子女………………………………… 8 壹、身心障礙者…………………………………………… 8 貳、身心障礙者的子女…………………………………… 22 第二節自我認同理論………………………………………… 27 壹、何謂自我……………………………………………… 28 貳、自我認同的意涵與內容……………………………… 29 參、自我認同的形塑……………………………………… 33 肆、敘說觀點下的自我認同……………………………… 35 伍、小結…………………………………………………… 37 第三節影響身心障礙者的子女的自我認同的因素………… 38 壹、身心障礙者孕育下一代的選擇……………………… 39 貳、身心障礙者的身體意象與障礙認同………………… 41 參、教科書與媒體中的身心障礙者圖像………………… 45 肆、身心障礙者的污名與文化…………………………… 47 伍、小結…………………………………………………… 49 第三章研究方法…………………………………………………… 52 第一節研究設計……………………………………………… 52 第二節資料蒐集分法………………………………………… 53 壹、選樣原則……………………………………………… 53 貳、研究對象來源………………………………………… 54 參、資料蒐集方式………………………………………… 55 第三節資料分析……………………………………………… 57 壹、資料分析過程………………………………………… 57 貳、研究嚴謹性…………………………………………… 59 第四節研究者角色與研究倫理……………………………… 59 壹、研究者角色…………………………………………… 59 貳、研究倫理……………………………………………… 62 第四章研究發現與分析…………………………………………… 64 第一節同行的路上不孤單…………………………………… 64 壹、永遠要爭一口氣－梓軒……………………………… 65 貳、不然還能怎麼樣－阿國……………………………… 67 參、要做就做到最好－樂樂……………………………… 69 肆、說了你們也不懂－小鬱……………………………… 72 伍、我想有一個完整的家－小小………………………… 74 陸、順其自然的人生－小美……………………………… 76 第二節身心障礙者的子女的生活經驗……………………… 78 壹、子女對家庭的承擔及照顧經驗……………………… 79 貳、逃避不了的眼光……………………………………… 88 參、「異樣」的經驗……………………………………… 92 肆、男女朋友交往與婚姻的考量不同…………………… 97 伍、父母的高期待、自我要求與補償性競爭心理……… 100 第三節身心障礙者的子女的自我認同歷程………………… 104 壹、覺察差異……………………………………………… 105 貳、自卑與烙印…………………………………………… 110 參、忍受與接受…………………………………………… 115 肆、成年後對過去的經驗回顧…………………………… 120 伍、小結…………………………………………………… 125 第五章研究結論與建議…………………………………………… 128 第一節研究結論……………………………………………… 128 壹、身障者的子女的生活經驗…………………………… 128 貳、身障者的子女的自我認同…………………………… 130 第二節研究建議……………………………………………… 137 壹、從教育與媒體層面倡導對於身障者與其家庭正確的認知…………………………………………………… 137 貳、增強助人工作者的多元文化敏感度………………… 138 參、身心障礙政策與福利服務需確實落實……………… 140 肆、對社會工作實務的建議……………………………… 142 第三節研究限制與反思……………………………………… 143 壹、研究的限制…………………………………………… 143 貳、未來研究建議………………………………………… 145 參、我的反思……………………………………………… 146 參考文獻…………………………………………………………… 149 附錄一……………………………………………………………… 159 附錄二……………………………………………………………… 160 圖次圖2-1 影響身心障礙者的子女的自我認同作用…………… 51 圖4-1-1 梓軒的家系圖………………………………………… 65 圖4-1-2 阿國的家系圖………………………………………… 67 圖4-1-3 樂樂的家系圖………………………………………… 69 圖4-1-4 小鬱的家系圖………………………………………… 72 圖4-1-5 小小的家系圖………………………………………… 74 圖4-1-6 小美的家系圖………………………………………… 76 圖5-1 身心障礙者的子女的自我認同歷程………………… 134 表次表2-1 身心障礙者障礙類別一覽表…………………………… 12 表3-1 受訪對象基本資料……………………………………… 55
dc.language.iso	zh-TW
dc.title	不一樣的父母親-身心障礙者的子女的自我認同	zh_TW
dc.title	Different parents- The self-identity of the children of parents with disabilities	en
dc.type	Thesis
dc.date.schoolyear	101-2
dc.description.degree	碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee	林敏慧,王育瑜
dc.subject.keyword	身心障礙,身心障礙者的子女,自我認同,敘事心理,自卑與烙印,	zh_TW
dc.subject.keyword	people with disabilities,children of parents with disabilities,self-identity,narrative psychology,inferiority and stigma,	en
dc.relation.page	160
dc.rights.note	未授權
dc.date.accepted	2013-08-02
dc.contributor.author-college	社會科學院	zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept	社會工作學研究所	zh_TW
顯示於系所單位：	社會工作學系

文件中的檔案：

檔案	大小	格式
ntu-102-1.pdf 未授權公開取用	1.8 MB	Adobe PDF

顯示文件簡單紀錄

系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。