請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17356
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳忠仁 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsu-Kuo Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃許國 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T00:08:30Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-28 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Barmey, J (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained. Competitive Advantage,' Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
Casadesus-Masanell Ramon, David B. Yoffie, and Sasha Mattu. (2012), 'Intel Corporation: 1968-2003.' Harvard Business School Case 703-427, November 2002. (Revised February 2010.) Ghemawat, Pankaj, and Jan W. Rivkin. (2006), 'Creating Competitive Advantage.' Harvard Business School Background Note 798-062, February Grove, A. S. (1996).”Only the paranoid survive: How to exploit the crisis points that challenge every company and career “. New York: Currency Doubleday. Rothaermel, F.T. (2008). “Technological Innovation: Generating Economic Results Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, “Innovation and Economic Growth, Volume 18, 201–225 Humphrey, Albert (2005). SWOT Analysis for Management Consulting. SRI Alumni Newsletter. Retrieved from SRI International. Johnson et al. (2005). Exploring Corporate Strategy (7th ed.). Essex: Pearson EducationLimited Kenneth L. K (2011), “Capturing Value in Global Networks: Apple’s iPad and iPhone, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the U.S. National Science Foundation (CISE/IIS) Porter, M.E. (1979). “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy.” Harvard Business Review, March/ April New York: Free Press. Porter, M.E. (1979), “Five Forces Model” Harvard Business Review, March-April 1979: p137-145 Porter, M.E. (1980). “Competitive Advantage.” New York: Free Press. Porter, M.E. (1985). “The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance”, New York, Free Press Porter, M.E. (1996), “What is strategy?” Harvard Business Review, v74, n6 (Nov-Dec, 1996):61 (18 pages). Porter, M.E. (2001), “Strategy and the Internet” Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 62-78. Porter, M.E. (2008), “The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, January 2008. Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990) The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review (v. 68, no. 3) pp. 79–91 Website Material: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_iphone http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPad http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Tick-Tock http://www.altera.com/end-markets/consumer/images/pld-opportunities-fig4.gif http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2011/09/13/intel-and-google-to-optimize-android-platform-for-intel-architecture http://www.intc.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=638502 http://hothardware.com/Reviews/Intel-Unveils-10Core-Xeons-MissionCritical-Servers/ http://www.altera.com/end-markets/consumer/images/pld-opportunities-fig4.gif http://fmcg-marketing.blogspot.tw/2007/10/core-competency-and-competitive.html http://www.intc.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=638502 http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2011/09/13/intel-and-google-to-optimize-android-platform-for-intel-architecture http://www.ict-pulse.com/2011/07/edge-wimax-3g-4g-what%E2%80%99s-the-difference/ http://extanz.com/2009/06/12/what-do-engagement-and-the-value-chain-have-in-common/ http://www.ni.com/white-paper/13467/zht http://www.intc.com/annuals.cfm, 2012 Annual Report and Form 10-K http://toddcarothers.com/2010/09/us-mobile-network-roadmap-sorry-wimax/ ABI 2013 Mobile Device Shipments Market Data, 2013 Apr ABI Worldwide Semiconductor Market, 2013 Feb IDC 2012 Mobile Phone Market share, 2013 May | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17356 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去幾年來隨著行動運算裝置產業和雲端產業的蓬勃發展,消費者已經不再需要坐在電腦前面進行上網、閱讀網路新聞、看影片、使用日常的應用軟體,而取而代之的是在任何地方使用平版電腦和智慧型手機。
過去幾年英特爾在行動運算裝置的發展上並不成功,也因此於2007年公司將其組織裡的安謀(ARM)行動運算裝置的部門XScale賣給了Marvel,打算發展自己的X86行動運算裝置。然而直到2011年,個人電腦仍然持續成長,以致於英特爾並未將行動運算列為公司最重要的策略,造成其之後行動運算裝置產品相對競爭對手較不具競爭力。 隨著平版電腦和智慧型手機的成長,也間接的使得個人電腦產業的成長停滯並衰退。個人電腦產業面臨到的種種挑戰,使得英特爾必須重新制訂行動運算策略來面對市場的變化。回顧文獻,英特爾曾經從衰敗的記憶體產業轉型的成功的處理器產業,也曾經成功逆轉在伺服器處理器產業的劣勢,成為市場的領導者。 在本論文中,將針對英特爾在行動運算產業的競爭策略來進行探討分析,並用外在環境跟內在環境的分析來評斷其當時策略的可行性。最後針對分析結果提出一些策略性發展建議。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The mobile computing and cloud computing industry have prospered for many years. Consumers are now more willing to surf the internet, read the news, stream movies and use many applications using their mobile devices instead of their personal computers (PC).
Following its unsuccessful attempt in the mobile business industry, Intel sold its mobile business called ARM architecture XScale microprocessor to Marvel in 2007, and decided to design its own X86 Architecture mobile computing device. However, until 2011 when the PC industry was still growing, Intel did not make its mobile business strategy as crucial as needed. As a result, by 2012 its mobile computing device was less competitive than its competitors such as Qualcomm, NVidia. The growing demand in mobile devices such as tablets and smartphones indirectly cannibalizes the PC sales and causes the stagnation of the PC industry. With those increasing challenges, Intel amended its mobile business strategy and made several strategic moves for a mobile war. Historically, Intel has successfully switched from the falling memory business to the profitable microprocessor business. It has also turned around from unfavorable situation in the sever CPU segment, and finally became a market leader. In this thesis, the decision of Intel’s competitive strategy in the mobile computing industry will be analyzed. Both external and internal variables will be examined to determine the validity of this strategy at the present time. Finally, based on the result of analysis, strategic suggestions will be proposed. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:08:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00749016-1.pdf: 4815066 bytes, checksum: 59de909669927f226ae74f9711b56ff3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 #
Acknowledgement i 中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii CONTENTS iv LIST OF FIGURES vi LIST OF TABLES viii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Motives and Background 1 1.2 Research Purposes 3 1.3 Thesis Organization 4 Chapter 2 Literature Reviews 5 2.1 PEST Analysis 5 2.2 Porter’s Five Forces 7 2.3 SWOT Analysis 11 2.4 Value Chain Analysis 12 2.5 Porter’s Generic Strategies 15 Chapter 3 Methodology 18 3.1 Research Framework 18 3.2 Measures 19 3.3 Data Sources 19 Chapter 4 Case Description 20 4.1 Mobile Industry Overview 20 4.2 Technology Overview 22 4.3 Market Overview 24 4.4 Company History and Structure 26 4.5 Company Business Model 28 Chapter 5 Case Analysis 30 5.1 PEST Analysis 30 5.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis 33 5.3 Key Success Factors 36 5.4 SWOT Analysis 40 5.5 Value Chain Analysis 41 5.6 Intel Strategy 42 5.6.1 Core competencies to core products 43 5.6.2 Dual Strategy 44 5.6.3 Acquisition Strategy 49 5.6.4 Strategic Alliance with Operating System providers 51 5.6.5 Partnerships with Operators 54 5.6.6 Product segment solution 57 Chapter 6 Conclusion and Future Work 60 6.1 Conclusion 60 6.2 Future Work 62 REFERENCE 63 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 英特爾在行動運算產業之競爭策略之分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Analysis of Competitive Strategy of INTEL in Mobile Computing Industry | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪世章,林博文 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 英特爾,行動運算,行動裝置,系統單晶片, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Intel,mobile computing,mobile device,System on Chip, | en |
dc.relation.page | 64 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 企業管理碩士專班 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.7 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。