請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16845
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鍾國彪 | |
dc.contributor.author | Si-Man Lam | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林思敏 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T23:47:47Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-10-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-04-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 英文文獻
Alkhenizan A, Shaw C. (2012). Journal Family Community Med. The attitude of health care professionals towards accreditation: A systematic review of the literature. 19(2):74-80. Alkhenizan, A. and C. Shaw (2011). Impact of Accreditation on the Quality of Healthcare Services: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Annals of Saudi Medicine 31(4): 407-416. American Mecical Association. PCPI quality measures. [cited 2011/04/15 ; Available from http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/listserv/x-check/ qmeasure.cgi?submit=PCPI.] Ayanian, J. Z., Kohler, B. A., Abe, T., & Epstein, A. M. (1993). The Relation between Health-Insurance Coverage and Clinical Outcomes among Women with Breast-Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 329(5), 326-331. Bach, P. B., Cramer, L. D., Begg, C. B., & Warren, J. L. (2000). Racial differences in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. Reply. New England Journal of Medicine 342(7), 518-519. Bickell, N. A., Aufses, A. H., & Chassin, M. R. (2000). The quality of early-stage breast cancer care. Annals of Surgery, 232 (2), 220-224. Bennett, J, A., Brewer, C., Beyko, S., Bennett, S, A, L. Cancer Control Strategiesin Eleven OECD Countries. Final report. Canada: Minister of Health, 1999. Braithwaite, J., J. Westbrook, et al. (2006). A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation. Bmc Health Services Research. Brasure M, Stensland J, Wellever A. Quality oversight: Why are rural hospitals less likely to be JCAHO accredited? Journal of Rural Health. 2000;16:324–36. Campbell SM, Sheaff R, Sibbald B. Implementing clinical governance in English primary care groups/trusts: Reconciling quality improvement and quality assurance. Qual Saf Health Care.2002;11:9–14. Connolly, J. L., & Fletcher, C. D. M. (2003 ). What is needed to satisfy the American college of surgeons commission on cancer requirements for the pathologic reporting of cancer specimens. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 119(5), 629-629. Chung, K.P., Lai, M.S., Cheng, S.H., Tang, S.T., Huang, C.C., Cheng, A.L., & Hsieh, P.C.(2008). Organization-based performance measures of cancer care quality: core measure development for breast cancer in Taiwan. European Journal of Cancer Care, 17(1): 5-18. Chen, T.M., Chang, T.M., Huang, P.T., Tsai, M.H., Lin, L.F., Liu, C.C., Ho, K.S., Siauw, C.P., Chao, P.L., &Tung, J.N.(2008). Management and patient survival in hepatocellular carcinoma: does the physician's level of experience matter? Journal Of Gastroenterology And Hepatology, 23(7 Pt 2): e179-188. Coc. Commission on Cancer Approval Program[cited 2010/09/10; Available from http://www.facs.org/cancerprogram/index.html ] Connolly, J. L., & Fletcher, C. D. M. (2003 ). What is needed to satisfy the American college of surgeons commission on cancer requirements for the pathologic reporting of cancer specimens. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 119(5), 629-629. Devers K, Pham H, Liu G. What is driving hospitals’ patient-safety efforts? Health Aff. 2007;23:103–15. Epstein, A. M., Ayanian, J. Z., Keogh, J. H., Noonan, S. J., Armistead, N., Cleary, P. D., Conti, R. M. (2000). The Effect of Patients' Preferences on Racial Differences in Access to Renal Transplantation New England Journal of Medicine, 343(21), 1537-U1538. Garrosa, E., Rainho, C., Moreno-Jimenez, B., & Monteiro, M. J. (2010). The relationship between job stressors, hardy personality, coping resources and burnout in a sample of nurses: A correlational study at two time points. International Journal of Nursing Studies 47. 205–215. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.014 Grenade L, Boldy D. The accreditation experience: Views of residential aged care providers.Geriaction. 2002; (20): 5–9. Greenfield D, Braithwaite J (2008). Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. International Journal of Quality Health Care. 20(3):172-83. Grunfeld, E., Whelan, T. J., Zitzelsberger, L., Willan, A. R., Montesanto, B., & Evans, W. K. (2000). Cancer care workers in Ontario: prevalence of burnout, job stress and job satisfaction. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal, 163(2), 166-169. Gigantesco , A., & Morosini , P. (2010) .Mental health services accreditation in Italy. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16. 1157–1163. Gough L, Reynolds T. Is clinical pathology accreditation worth it.A survey of CPA-accredited laboratories? Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 2000;8:195–201. Hansen, N., Sverke, M., & Naswall, K. (2009). Predicting burnout from demands and resources at three hospitals run with different ownership types: A questionnaire study among nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46 ,96-107. Houssami, N., &Sainsbury, R.(2006). Breast cancer: Multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomes. European Journal of Cancer, 42(15): 2480-2491. Hurst, K. (1997). The nature and value of small and community hospital accreditation. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv, 10(2-3), 94-106. Imanaka, et al. (2008). Impact of hospital accreditation on infection control programs in teaching hospitals in Japan. American Journal of Infection Control 36(3): 212-219. Inagi, K., Takahashi, H., Okamoto, M.A., Nakayama, M., Makoshi, T., & Nagai, H.(2002). Treatment effects in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 122(4): 25-29. Joint Commission International. Disease-specific care certification. 2008.03.01 [http://www.jointcommission.org/CertificationPrograms/ Disease-SpecificCare/] Kahn, K. L., Malin, J. L., Adams, J., & Ganz, P. A. (2002). Developing a reliable, valid, and feasible plan for quality-of-care measurement for cancer: how should we measure? Med Care, 40(6 Suppl), III73-85. Klazinga, N., Fischer, C., & Asbroek, A (2011). Health services research related to performance indicators and benchmarking in Europe. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy.16(2): 38–47. Krzyzanowska, M. K., Weeks, J. C., & Earle, C. C. (2003). Treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer in the real world: Population-based practices and effectiveness. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21(18), 3409-3414. doi: Doi 10.1200/Jco.2003.03.007 Licitra, L., Bossi, P., &Locati, L.D.(2006). A multidisciplinary approach to squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: what is new? Current Opinion in Oncology, 18(3): 253-257. Landon., B. E., Normand, S. L. T, & Blumenthal, D. (2003). Physician clinical performance assessment. JAMA, 290:1183-1189. Maue, S.K., Segal, R., Kimberlin, C.L., &Lipowski, E.E.(2004). Predicting physician guideline compliance: an assessment of motivators and perceived barriers. The American Journal Of Managed Care, 10(6): 383-391. Malin, J.L., Schneider, E.C., Epstein, A.M., Adams, J., Emanuel, E.J., &Kahn, K.L.(2006). Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? J Clin Oncol, 24(4): 626-634. Menck, H. R., Blankenship, C., & Fremgen, A. M. (1997). The National Cancer Data Base and physician network. Top Health Inf Manage, 17(3), 45-59. Sack, C., Lutkes, P., Gunther, W., Erbel, E., Jockel, K-H., & G. J Holtmann. (2010). Challenging the holy grail of hospital accreditation: A cross sectional study of inpatient satisfaction in the field of cardiology. BMC Health Services Research, 10(120), 1-7. Salmon J, Heavens J, Lombard C, Tavrow P. The impact of accreditation on the quality of hospital care. KwaZulu-Natal province republic of South Africa: Published for the U.S. agency for international development (USAID) by the quality assurance project, University Research Co; 2003. Schmaltz, P., Williams, C., Chassin, R., Loeb, J.M., & Wachter, R.M..(2012). Hospital Performance Trends on National Quality Measures and the Association With Joint Commission Accreditation. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 6(8), 454-461. Schultz, E.M., Silvestri, G.A., &Gould, M.K.(2008). Variation in experts' beliefs about lung cancer growth, progression, and prognosis. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 3(4): 422-426. Simunovic, M., Rempel, E., Theriault, M.E., Coates, A., Whelan, T., Holowaty, E., Langer, B., &Levine, M.(2006). Influence of hospital characteristics on operative death and survival of patients after major cancer surgery in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 49(4): 251-258. Spinks, T., Albright, H. W., Feeley, T. W., Walters, R., Burke, T. W., Aloia, T., Shine, K. I. (2012 ). Ensuring quality cancer care A Follow-Up Review of the Institute of Medicine's 10 Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Cancer Care in America. Cancer, 118(10), 2571-2582. Stoelwinder, J. A study of doctors’ views on how hospital accreditation can assist them provide quality and safe care to consumers. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine; 2004. 中文文獻 國民健康局. 96年癌症登記年報. 2010 衛生署. 97年度死因統計. 2010. 國家衛生研究院. 癌症診療品質認證作業計畫. 2010 [cited 2010/09/10; Available from: http://tcog.nhri.org.tw/accredit/. NHS. National Cancer Peer Review Programme. 2010 [cited 2010/09/10; Available from: http://www.cquins.nhs.uk/. 國民健康局. 96年治療癌症個案達50案以上各縣市醫院名單. 2010; Available from: http://www.bhp.doh.gov.tw/BHPnet/Portal/Them_Show.aspx?Subject=200712250030&Class=0&No=201002220001. 國民健康局. 97,98年癌症診療品質認證合格醫院名單. 2010 [cited 2010/09/10; Available from: http://www.bhp.doh.gov.tw/BHPnet/Portal/Them_Show.aspx?Subject=200712250030&Class=0&No=200712250204. 王俊文、葉德豐、曾坤儀(2003)。台灣醫院評鑑趨勢之探討,中山醫學雜誌 14(4),513 -522。 鍾國彪等人 :實施癌症診療品質認證對我國癌症醫療品質之影響,衛生署國民健康局委託計劃,2011。 劉湫美,黃國哲,邱昌芳,劉滄梧。美國、英國及台灣之癌症診療品賥評核。臺灣醫學,14(2),208-216頁。2010年。 劉湫美,黃國哲,邱昌芳,劉滄梧。美國、英國及台灣之癌症診療品賥評核。臺灣醫學,14(2),208-216頁。2010年。 劉湫美,劉滄梧,李莉鈺,邱昌芳,許怡欣,黃國哲。醫院人員對癌症診療品賥認證詴評計畫之認知探討─以八家詴評醫院為例。醫務管理期刊,10(3): 201-219頁。2009年。 劉滄梧、曾思文、劉湫美、彭汪嘉康:癌症中心分級認證研究計畫成果報告。台北:行政院衛生署國民健康局,2005。 劉滄梧、劉湫美、彭汪嘉康:癌症診療品質認證試評計畫成果報告。台北:行政院衛生署國民健康局,2007。 劉湫美、劉滄梧:癌症診療品質認證之沿革, 衛生醫療政策, 2008。 劉湫美、劉滄梧、李莉鈺、邱昌芳、許怡欣、黃國哲:醫院人員對癌症診療品質認證試評計劃之認知探討-以八家試評醫院為例,2009,10(3):p. 201-219。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16845 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 為確保及提升各癌症照護機構之醫療照護品質,國民健康局辦理「癌症診療品質認證計畫」,因此,衛生署依公共衛生預防三段五級方式辦理相關癌症宣導、診療品質提升,並建置癌症登記與癌症篩檢資料庫。國際醫療品質評估的重點已逐漸從醫療機構整體醫療品質的評鑑,延伸至針對特定疾病診療品質的認證。由於癌症是目前全球最重要的公共衛生議題之一,因此世界各國除了積極制訂癌症防治策略及發展癌症品質測量指標外,更以建立癌症照護品質評核辦法,作為癌症總體照護的監測機制。本研究欲瞭解各國癌症診療品質認證制度的概況、做法及流程,供我國現今的癌症診療品質制度作參考。此外,探討癌症診療品質認證制度對我國癌症診療照護的影響,藉由認證制度對癌症醫療照護品質結果的影響因素,提出適合我國的癌症診療品質認證之建議。
首先以文獻查證,結合專家座談會議作進一步的調查。亦選取北部及中部地區各一間癌症認證醫院進行訪談,瞭解其通過認證關鍵因素與認證制度相關影響。最後,舉辦第三階段之專家及焦點團體座談會,更深入探討癌症診療品質認證所帶來的影響。再以質性研究之內容分析法獲取及彙整相關之研究結果與建議。 認證醫院大多肯定癌症診療品質認證制度在醫院文化、病患照護模式、編制人力、醫療人員執業安全、專業職責與訓練等方面的正面影響。然而,認證制度亦增加行政工作、削減照護病患時間,亦增加相關人員工作負荷。此外,各專業的合作與溝通,醫院管理高層的絕對支持與政府機關的款項補助,為以通過與推動 認證制度之關鍵。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In order to increase medical care quality of cancer care institutions, the National Health Bureau carries out the “Accreditation Program on Cancer Care”. Also, with the method of three stages and five levels of public health prevention, Department of Health handles the related cancer advocacy, quality promotion of diagnosis and treatment, and establishes a data base of cancer registration and screening. The emphasis of international medical quality evaluation has extended from evaluation of overall medical quality of medical institutions to accreditation program on cancer care of specific diseases. Since cancer is one of the most important issues of public health all over the world, besides formulating cancer prevention strategies and developing cancer quality measurement index, countries all over the world also establish cancer care quality appraisal methods as the detection mechanism of cancer overall care. This research intends to understand the overview, the method and the procedure of accreditation system on cancer care of every country, in order to provide reference for that of our country at present. Besides, it also intends to investigate the influence of quality certification system of cancer diagnosis and treatment on our country’s cancer medical care, and put forward suggestions for accreditation program on cancer care which is suitable for our country basing on this factor.
Firstly, verify with literatures, and carry out further investigation with the combination of expert symposiums. Also, select one cancer certification hospital from the north and the middle area for interview, and understand their key factors of passing the certification and related influence of the certification system. Lastly, hold the expert and focus group symposiums of the third stage, and investigate the influence of accreditation program on cancer care t more deeply. And then acquire and compile related research results and suggestions with the method of content analysis of qualitative research. Certification hospitals mostly affirm the positive influence of accreditation program on cancer care on hospital culture, patient care model, formation of labor power, medical staff operation safety, profession duty and training, etc. However, the accreditation system also increases the administrative work, reduces the time for patient care and increases the workload of related staff. Besides, cooperation and communication of every profession, absolute support of top management staff of the hospital and fund subsidies from the government are the keys to pass and push forward the accreditation system. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T23:47:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00848036-1.pdf: 1237812 bytes, checksum: 06d13e60ba7bd5f82765687e05a1501e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 各國癌症診療品質認證之相關研究 5 第二節 影響癌症照護品質因素之相關研究 19 第三節 評鑑制度對於照護品質影響之實證研究 20 第三章 研究方法 26 第一節 研究設計及流程 26 第二節 研究對象及材料 29 第三節 資料蒐集處理及分析 33 第四章 研究結果 36 第一節 第一階段各醫院參與癌症診療品質認證制度之問題及挑戰 36 第二節 第二階段認證醫院訪談結果 42 第三節 第三階段專家座談會訪談結果 44 第五章 討論 54 第一節 研究材料與方法之討論 54 第二節 各國癌症診療品質制度與我國相較之討論 55 第三節 重要研究結果之討論 57 第四節 研究限制 62 第六章 結論與建議 63 參考文獻 65 中文文獻 65 英文文獻 67 附錄 73 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 臺灣癌症診療品質認證對癌症照護可能影響之探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | An Exploration of the Possible Impacts of Accreditation Program on Cancer Care in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉滄梧,邱秀渝,郭乃文(Nai-Wen Kuo) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 癌症診療品質認證,癌症照護, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Accreditation program on cancer care,Cancer care, | en |
dc.relation.page | 79 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-04-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.21 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。