請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16672
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 沈中華 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ting Lo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 羅意婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T23:43:17Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-07-29 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-07-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] 黃玉麗、沈中華. 盈餘管理對銀行債務資金成本之影響-信用評等觀點. 管理
學報, 26:599–632, 2009. [2] 沈中華、王儷容、呂青樺、吳孟紋. 金融機構在中國的機會與ࡷ戰. 智勝書局, 2010. [3] 黃玉麗、沈中華. 發行體評等高於主權評等之因素探討—以全球商業銀行為 例. 管理學報, 27:547–570, 2010. [4] 黃培琳. 中國發展外部信用評等概況. 貨幣觀測與信用評等, 81:30–36, 2010. [5] 沈中華、吳翰屏. 中國企業信用評等決定因素: 以新華遠東為例. Master’s thesis, 國立臺灣大學, 台北市, 2011. [6] 黃玉麗.張元.沈中華. 不請自來的銀行信用評等有向下偏誤的現象嗎? 配 對方法, 40:149–188, 2012. [7] E. Altman and S. Katz. Statistical bond rating classification using financial and accounting data. Topical Research in Accounting, 1976. [8] E. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick and S. Treepongkaruna. An analysis of the determinants of bank ratng: comparison across rating agencies. Australian Journal of Management, 36(3):405–424, 2011. [9] R. Cantor and F. Packer. The credit rating industry. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review, 19(2):1–26, 1994. 42 [10] L. H. Ederington. Why split ratings occur. Financial Management, 15(1):37–47, 1986. [11] P. G. Farnham and G. S. Cluff. The bond rating game revisited: What information can local officials use? Journal of Urban Affairs, 6(4):21–38, 1984. [12] S. F. Gray, A. S. Mirkovic, and V. Ragunathan. The determinants of credit ratings: Australian evidence. Australian Journal of Management, 31:333–354, 2006. [13] L. H.Ederington. Classification models and bond ratings. Financial Review, 20(4): 237–262, 1985. [14] J. Horrigan. The determination of long-term credit standing with financial ratios. Journal of Accounting Research, 4:44–62, 1966. [15] L. P. Hsueh and D. S. Kidwell. Bond ratings: Are two better than one? Financial Management, 17(1):46–53, 1988. [16] R. S. Kaplan and G. Urwitz. Statistical models of bond ratings: A methodological inquiry. The Journal of Business, 52:231–261, 1979. [17] M. Livingston, A. Naranjo, and L. Zhou. Split bond ratings and rating migration. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(8):1613–1624, 2008. [18] M. Livingston and L. Zhou. Split bond ratings and information opacity premiums. Financial Management, 39(2):515–532, 2010. [19] D. P. Morgan. Rating banks: Risk and uncertainty in an opaque industry. The American Economic Review, 92(4):874–888, 2002. [20] G. Pinches and K. Mingo. A multivariate analysis of industrial bond ratings. The Journal of Finance, 28:1–18, 1973. [21] T. Pogue and R. Soldofsky. What is in a bond rating? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 4:201–228, 1969. 43 [22] L. Rojas-Suarez. Rating banks in emerging markets: What credit rating agencies should learn from financial indicators. Institute for International Economics Working Paper, 2001. [23] C.-H. Shen, Y.-L. Huang, and I. Hasan. Asymmetric benchmarking in bank credit rating. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 22:171– 193, 2012. [24] R. West. An alternative approach predicting corporate bond ratings. Journal of Accounting Research, 7:118–127, 1970. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16672 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 中國境內的信評機構所提供的評等有普遍過高的現象,因此機構投資人或銀行等市場上的專業機構往往不認為中國信評機構所提供的評等能真實反應受評標的之信用品質。本研究試圖瞭解商業銀行所發行廣義的金融債券債券獲得雙評等,亦或是單評等對債券的信用評等是否有顯著影響,進行Ordered Logit 迴歸,並找出銀行的獲利性指標、效率性指標、財務槓桿、資本適足率、流動性指標、資產品質以及債券的特徵變數包含債券之票面利率與到期期限對信用評等的影響與關係。實證結果顯示,擁有雙評等的債券其債券信用評等較單評等債券高,此外,代表商業銀行獲利性的股東權益報酬率(Return on Equity, ROE)與代表效率性的成本收入比皆對信用評等的高低有一定的影響力,銀行獲利能力越強擁有較高的信用品質,也就得到較高的信用評等,銀行成本收入比越高則其信用評等越低。債券的特徵變數中的票面利率與到期期限也對信用評等有顯著影響。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Credit rating agencies (CRAs) in China tend to provide ratings that are higher than what they are supposed to be, so institutional investors and banks do not expect those credit ratings to reveal the real credit quality of the respective rating targets. This paper tried to find out would generalized financial bonds having dual rating plays the important role in determining the bond credit or not with Ordered Logit model. Eight explanatory variables were used in the model: profitability, efficiency, financial leverage, TierI, liquidity, quality, coupon rate and maturity. The result showed that having dual rating would have higher bond rating and bond rating tend to be higher with higher ROE and lower cost income ratio. It also showed that coupon rate and maturity also play the important role in determining the bond credit. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T23:43:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01723019-1.pdf: 1777993 bytes, checksum: 724f2d1b806089a112383ae2c06e5a7b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書......................................................................................................... i
致謝................................................................................................................................. ii 中文摘要......................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ........................................................................................................................... iv 目錄................................................................................................................................. v 圖目錄............................................................................................................................. vii 表目錄.............................................................................................................................viii 第一章緒論................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 研究動機........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 研究目的........................................................................................................ 3 1.3 研究架構........................................................................................................ 4 第二章中國信用評等產業介紹................................................................................... 5 2.1 中國信用評等發展歷程................................................................................ 5 2.2 中國信用評等產業現況................................................................................ 13 2.2.1 信用評級機構................................................................................ 13 2.2.2 信用評級機構監管現況................................................................ 16 2.3 廣義的金融債券............................................................................................ 17 2.3.1 廣義金融債券的定義.................................................................... 17 2.3.2 商業銀行次級債券........................................................................ 17 2.3.3 商業銀行金融債券........................................................................ 18 2.3.4 次級債券與金融債券比較............................................................ 19 v 第三章文獻回顧........................................................................................................... 20 3.1 信用評等決定因素之相關研究.................................................................... 20 3.2 雙評等之相關研究........................................................................................ 22 第四章研究方法........................................................................................................... 26 第五章樣本選取........................................................................................................... 27 5.1 信用評等資料................................................................................................ 27 5.2 變數選取........................................................................................................ 28 5.3 敘述統計........................................................................................................ 29 第六章實證分析與結果............................................................................................... 34 第七章結論與建議....................................................................................................... 40 7.1 結論................................................................................................................ 40 7.2 研究限制........................................................................................................ 41 參考文獻......................................................................................................................... 42 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 中國大陸債券市場信用評等—以廣義金融債券為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Credit Rating of Bond Market in China:Take Generalized Financial Bonds as an Example | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃玉麗,林蒼祥,吳孟紋 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 中國信用評等機構,評級通膨,雙評等,Ordered Logit 模型, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Credit Rating Agencies in China,Rating Inflation,Dual Rating,Long-Term Debt Ratings,Ordered Logit, | en |
dc.relation.page | 44 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-07-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.74 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。