請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16615
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 柯淳涵(Chun-Han Ko) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chung-Yu Guan | en |
dc.contributor.author | 官崇煜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T18:24:01Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-01-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Afonso, M. D. and M. N. Pinho (1991) Membrane separation processes in pulp and paper production. Journal of Filtration and Separation. 28(1): 42-44.
Alder, M. G. and G. R. Hill (1950) The kinetics and mechanism of hydroxide ion catalyzed ozone decomposition in aqueous solution. Amat, A. M., A. Arques, M. A. Miranda and F. Lopez (2005) Use of ozone and/or UV in the treatment of effluents from board paper industry. Chemosphere 60(8): 1111-1117. Arslan-Alaton, W. (2003) Novel catalytic photochemical and hydrothermal treatment processes for acid dye wastewater. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part a-Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering 38(8): 1615-1627. Assalin, M. R., M. A. Rosa and N. Duran (2004) Remediation of Kraft effluent by ozonation-Effect of applied ozone concentration and initial pH. Ozone Science and Engineering. 26(3): 317-322. Balcioglu, A. I. and C. Ferhan (1991) Treatability of kraft pulp bleaching wastewater by biochemical and photocatalytic oxidation. Water Science Technology. 40(1): 281-288. Barker, R. and A. R. Jones (1988) Treatment of malodorants in air by the UV/O3 technique. Ozone science and Engineering. 10(4): 405. Chernoberezhskii, Y. M., A. S. Dyagileava and I. A. Barysheva (1994) Coagulation treatment of wastewaters from paper and pulp plants. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry. 67(3): 354-359. Cotton, F.A. and G. Wilkinson (1996) Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 2nd ed., Interscience Publishers, a division of John Wiley and sons, Inc., New York, pp. 365-367. Das, C. P. and L. N. Patnaik (2000) Removal of lignin by industrial solid wastes. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste Management Pract. 4(4): 156-161. Dube, M., R. McLean, D. MacLatchy and P. Savage (2000) Reverse osmosis treatment: effects on effluent quality. Pulp and Paper Canada. 101(8): 42-45. Dufresne, R., L. Caouette, G. W. Norval and C. J. Kanters (2000) Treatment of clean condensate using catalytically enhanced oxidation. Proc. 86th PAPTAC annual meeting, Montreal, Quebec. Canada: Pulp and Paper Technical Association of Canada. p.A257. Falth, F. (2000) Ultrafiltration of E1 stage effluent for partial closure of the bleach plant. Proc. 86th PAPTAC annual meeting, Montreal, Quebec. Canada: Pulp and Paper Technical Association of Canada. p.B85. Freire, R. S., A. Kunz and N. Duran (2000) Some chemical and toxicological aspects about paper mill effluent treatment with ozone. Environmental Technology. 21: 717-721. Ganjidoust, H., K. Tatsumi, T. Yamagishi and R. N. Gholian (1997) Effect of synthetic and natural coagulant on lignin removal from pulp and paper waste water. Water Science Technology. 35(2-3): 291-296. Gellerstedt, G. (1992) Permanganate oxidation. In: Lin, S. Y. and C. W. Dence (eds.) Methods in Lignin Chemistry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. pp. 322-333. Gierer, J. (1982) Holzforschung. 36: 43-51; 55-64. Gieldowska-Bulska, A., J. Perkowski and L. Kos (2004) The application of ozone in the decomposition of aqueous solutions of nonionic surfactants. Ozone Science and Engineering. 26(2): 217-225. Glaze, W. H. (1987) Drinking-Water Treatment with Ozone. Environmental Science and Technology. 21(3): 224-230. Hassan, M. M. and C. J. Hawkyard (2002) Decolourisation of aqueous dyes by sequential oxidation treatment with ozone and Fenton’s reagent. Journal of Chemical Technology and Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 77: 834-841. Hoigné, J. and H. Bader (1993) Rate constants of reactions of ozone with organic and inorganic compounds in water-Ⅰ. Non-dissociating organic compounds. Water Research. 17(2): 173-183. Hoigné, J., Bader, H., Hagg, W.R. and J. Staehelin (1985) Rate constants of ozone with organic and inorganic compounds in water-Ⅲ. Inorganic compounds and radicals. Water Research. 19: 993-1005. Horsch, P., A. Speck and F. H. Frimmel (2003) Combined advanced oxidation and biodegradation of industrial effluents from the production of stilbene-based fluorescent whitening agents. Water Research 37(11): 2748-2756. Hostachy, J. C., G. Lenon, J. L. Pisicchio, S. Coste and C. Lgeay (1997) Reduction of pulp and paper mill pollution by ozone treatment. Water Science Technology. 35(2-3): 261-268. Jonsson, A. S., C. Jonsson, M. Teppler, P. Tomani and S. Wannstrom (1996) Treatments of paper coating colour effluents by membrane filtration. Desalination. 105: 263-276. Kallas, J. and R. Munter (1994) Post-treatment of pulp and paper industry wastewaters using oxidation and adsorption processes. Water Science Technology. 29(5-6): 259-271. Keyvani, M. and N. C. Gardner (1989) Operating Characteristics of Rotating Beds. Chemical Engineering Progress. 85: 48-52. Koppol, A. R., M. J. Bagajewicz, B. J. Dericks and M. J. Savelski (2004) On zero water discharge solutions in the process industry. Advances in Environmental Research. 8(2): 151-171. Korhonen, S. M., S. E. Metsarinne and T. A. Tuhakanen (2000) Removal of ethylenediaminenetraacetic acid (EDTA) from pulp mill effluents by ozonation. Ozone. Science Engeneering. 22: 279-286. Laari, A., S. Korhonen, J. Kallas and T. Tuhkanen (2000) Selective removal of lipophilic wood extractives from paper mill water circulations by ozonation. Ozone Science and Engineering. 22: 585-605. Langlais, B., A. R. Davif and R. B. Deborah (1991) Ozone in water treatment: Application and Engineering. Lewis Publisher. P.13-24. Lin, C. C. (1999) The study of Higee. Doctoral Dissertation, Taiwan National University. Lin, C.C., B. C. Chen, Y. S. Chen and S. K. Hsu (2008) Feasibility of a cross-flow rotating packed bed in removing carbon dioxide from gaseous streams. Separation and Purification Technology. 62: 509-514. Lin, C. C. and G. S. Jian (2007) Characteristics of rotating packed bed equipped with blade packings. Separation and Purification Technology. 54: 51-60. Lin, C. C. and Y. R. Su (2008) Performance of rotating packed beds in removing ozone from gaseous streams. 61: 311-316. Liu, H. S., C. C. Lin, S. C. Wu and H. W. Hsu. (1996) Characteristics of a Rotating Packed Bed. Industry and Engineering Chemistry Research. 35(10): 3590-3956. McCabe, W. L., J. C. Smith and P. Harriott. (1994) Unit Operations of Chemistry Engineering. 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Munjal, S., M. P. Dudukovic and P. Ramachandran (1989) Mass-transfer in Rotating Packed Beds-Ⅰ. Development of Gas-liquid and Liquid-gas Mass-transfer Correlations. Chemistry Engineering Science. 44(10): 2245-2256. Murthy, B. S. A., T. A. Sihorwala, H. V. Tilwankar and D. J. Killedar (1991) Removal of colour from pulp and paper mill effluents by sorption technique-a case study. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection. 11(5): 360. Oeller, H. J., I. Daniel and G. Weinberger (1997) Reduction in residual COD in biologically treated paper mill effluents by means of combined Ozone and Ozone/UV reactor stages. Water Science Technology. 35(2-3): 269-276. Perez, M., F. Torrades, X. Domenech and J. Peral (2002c) Treatment of bleaching Kraft mill effluents and polychlorinated phenolic compounds with ozonation. Journal of Chemical Technology and Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 77: 891-897. Pla, F. (1992b) Light scattering. In: Lin, S. Y. and C. W. Dence (eds.) Methods in Light Chemistry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. pp. 498-508. Rajvaidya, N. and D. K. Markandey (1998) Advances in environmental science and technology: treatment of pulp and paper industrial effluent. Ansari Road, New Delhi, India: A.P.H. Publishing. Roy-Arcand, L. and F. S. Archibald (1996) Ozonation as a treatment for mechanical and chemical pulp mill effluents. Ozone Science and Engineering.18: 363-384. Shawwa, A. R., D. W. Smith and D. C. Sego (2001) Color and chlorinated organics removal from pulp wastewater using activated petroleum coke. Water Research. 35(3): 745-749. Sevimli, M. F. (2005) Post-treatment of pulp and paper industry wastewater by advanced oxidation processes. Ozone Science and Engineering. 27(1): 37-43. Sevimli, M. F. and H. Z. Sarikaya (2002) Ozone treatment of textile effluents and dyes-Effect of applied ozone dose, pH and dye concentration. Journal of Chemical Technology and Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 77: 842-850. Staechelin, J., R. E. Buhler and J. Hoigné (1984) Ozone Decomposition in Water Studied by Pulse Radiolysis. 2. Hydroxyl and hydrogen tetroxide as chain intermediates. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 88(24): 5999-6004. Thompson, G., J. Swain, M. Kay and C. F. Forster (2001) The treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent: a review. Bioresource Technology. 77(3): 275-286. Tong, Z., S. Wada, Y. Takao, T. Yamagishi, I. Hiroyasu and K. Tamatsu (1999) Treatment of bleaching wastewater from pulp-paper plants in China using enzymes and coagulants. Journal of Environmental Science. 11(4): 480-484. Verenich, S., A. Laari and J. Kallas (2000) Wet oxidation of concentrated wastewater of paper mills for water cycle closing. Waste Management (N.Y.). 20(4): 287-293. Wagner M. and J. A. Nicell (2001) Treatment of a foul condensate from kraft pulping with horseradish peroxidase and hydrogen peroxide. Water Science and Technology. 35(2): 485-495. Yamamoto, S. (2001) Ozone treatment of bleached kraft pulp and waste paper. Japan Tappi Journal. 55(4): 90-97. Yeber, M. C., J. Rodriguez, J. Freer, J. Baeza, N. Duran and H. D. Mansilla (1999) Advanced oxidation of a pulp mill bleaching wastewater. Chemosphere 39(10): 1679-1688. Zaidi, A., H. Buisson, S. Sourirajan and H. Wood (1992) Ultra-and nano-filtration in advanced effluent treatment schemes for pollution control in the pulp and paper industry. Water Science and Technology. 25(10): 263-276. Zamora, P. P., E. Esposito, R. Pelegrini, R. Groto and N. Duran (1998) Effluent treatment of pulp and paper, and textile industries using immobilised horseradish peroxidase. Environment Technology. 19: 55-63. Zhou, H. and D. W. Smith (2002) Advanced technologies in water and wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science. 1(4): 47-264. Zhou, H. and D. W. Smith (1997) Process parameter development for ozonation of kraft pulp mill effluents. Water Science Technology. 35(2-3): 251-259. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16615 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究利用臭氧結合超重力旋轉填充床(HGRPB)對木質素單體與工業木質素溶液進行氧化處理,進一步探討降低水體污染物的可行性。試驗溶液分別由不同分子量的癒創木酚(guaiacol)、磺甲基化木質素磺酸鈉(lignosulfonate)與鹼性木質素(alkali lignin)配製。利用不同的臭氧供應量與HGRPB轉速以及酸鹼條件處理溶液,探討化學需氧量(COD)、總有機碳(TOC)、單體濃度及重量分子量的變化,進而計算系統內平均每克臭氧的去污重量,評估系統去污的效果。濃度為0.1 g/L的guaiacol溶液實驗中,臭氧1 g/hr質傳進入系統中,HGRPB轉速為5400 rpm以及反應條件為pH 7為基準實驗參數,6 g/hr 臭氧質傳量在處理時間30 min後,比起基準參數多去除了13%的COD,12%的TOC與5%的濃度,顯示輸入系統的臭氧質量愈高,去污效果愈好。提高HGRPB轉速處理時間3 min後,7200 rpm比基準參數處理多下降4%的COD,6%的TOC與6%的濃度,隨著轉速的提高,可提昇反應初期的去污程度。鹼性條件下處理30 min,可多下降13%的COD,11%的TOC與5%的濃度,推測臭氧在鹼性條件下增加自由基影響水中有機物的氧化反應。分子量愈低的單體在同樣反應參數的去污程度大於另外兩者高分子化合物。高分子化合物溶液在不同的處理參數,重量平均分子量隨著COD與TOC的消長有所變化。基準參數下,0.1 g/L lignosulfonic 與alkali lignin溶液分別從分子量12030降至1147與60148降至7093。增加臭氧傳輸,HGRPB的轉速與鹼性環境反應皆提升重量分子量的下降。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study combines the use of ozone system with High-Gravity Rotating Packed Bed (HGRPB) and conducts oxidation on solutions of lignin monomer and macromolecular compounds, in order to understand the viability for removal of water contaminants. The experimental samples include different molecular average weights of guaiacol, lignosulfonate and alkali lignin solutions. Controlling for different ozone dosages, HGRPB rotation speeds and pH levels, the COD, TOC, monomer concentrations and molecular average weights are measured and used to calculate the average reduction of contaminants per gram of ozone in the system. In the base case of 0.1 g/L of guaiacol solution, HGRPB is set at 5400 rpm and the reacting condition at pH 7. After 30 min of treatment time, 6 g/hr ozone dosage removes 13% more of COD, 12% more of TOC and 5% more of concentration than the standard 1 g/hr ozone dosage. This result indicates that the higher ozone dosage has the more contaminant removal. While controlling for higher HGRPB rotation speed at 7200 rpm yields 4% more of COD, 6% more of TOC and 6% more of concentration reduces. Higher rotation speed produces better removal results at the initial phase of treatment. 30 min of reaction under alkali conditions further reduce COD by 13%, TOC by 11% and the concentration by 5% more. Ozone is presumed to increase free radical under alkali condition and affects the oxidation of organic substances in water. Under identical condition, monomers with lower molecular average weights yield much higher reduction than the other two macromolecular compounds. The molecular average weights of the macromolecular compound solutions fluctuate with changes in COD and TOC. Under standard parameters, the molecular average weights of 0.1 g/L of lignosulfonate and alkali lignin solutions respectively reduce from 12030 to 1147 and from 60148 to 7093. Increasing ozone dosage, HGRPB rotation speed and alkali level yield more reduction of molecular average weights. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T18:24:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R96625041-1.pdf: 1410632 bytes, checksum: 8529f2ab3a530bf26702ffd6d02ca422 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgement........................................................................II
摘要..................................................................................................V ABSTRACT.......................................................................................VI TABLE OF CONTENTS....................................................................VIII LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................XV LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................XXIV I. Introduction..................................................................................1 II. Literature Review........................................................................4 2.1 Pulping Wastewater and Lignin..............................................4 2.1.1 Pulping Wastewater and its Treaments..............................4 2.1.1.1 Sedimentation/ Flotation..................................................5 2.1.1.2 Coagulation and Precipitation........................................5 2.1.1.3 Adsorption..........................................................................6 2.1.1.4 Chemical Oxidation..........................................................7 2.1.1.5 Membrane Filtration..........................................................8 2.1.1.6 Ozonization.........................................................................9 2.1.2 Acquisition of Inustrial Lignin................................................9 2.1.3 Determination of Molecular Average Weights of Polymer.........................................................................................10 2.2 Ozone......................................................................................12 2.2.1 Physical Chemical Properties of the Ozone.....................12 2.2.2 Ozone Reactive Mechanism to Organic Substances....................................................................................13 2.2.3 Decomposition of Ozone...................................................18 2.2.4 The Reaction of Lignin with Ozone....................................19 2.2.5 The Efficiency Decrease of Organics by Ozone Oxidation......................................................................................20 2.3 Introducing Liquid Contactor of High-Gravity Rotating Packed Bed..................................................................................21 2.3.1 Development of High-Gravity Technology......................21 2.3.2 Introducing Gas-Liquid Contact of High-Gravity Rotating Packed Bed..................................................................................23 2.3.3 Properties of Gas-Lquid Contactor of High-Gravity Rotating Packed Bed..................................................................26 2.3.3.1 Pressure Drop....................................................................26 2.3.3.2 Overflow............................................................................27 2.3.3.3 Coefficient of Liquid Film Mass Transfer.........................27 2.3.3.4 Coefficient of Gas Film Mass Transfer.............................28 2.3.4 HGRPB treats Solution.........................................................29 III. Materials and Methods...........................................................33 3.1 Experimental Procedures......................................................33 3.2 Experimental Apparatus........................................................34 3.3 Reactant Properties...............................................................37 3.4 Sampling Method..................................................................39 3.5 Water Quality Analysis...........................................................39 3.6 Quantitative Analysis of HPLC...............................................41 3.7 Molecular Weights Analysis...................................................42 3.8 SPME-GC-MS...........................................................................43 3.9 Calculation Method..............................................................45 IV. Results and Discussion............................................................47 4.1. Guaiacol................................................................................47 4.1.1 COD Analysis.......................................................................47 4.1.1.1 Different Ozone Dosages................................................48 4.1.1.2 Different Rotaton Speeds................................................49 4.1.1.3 Different pH Levels...........................................................50 4.1.1.4 Different Concentrations.................................................52 4.1.2 TOC Analysis........................................................................53 4.1.2.1 Different Ozone Dosages................................................54 4.1.2.2 Different Rotation Speeds...............................................56 4.1.2.3 Different pH Levels...........................................................57 4.1.2.4 Different Concentrations.................................................58 4.1.3 Polarity Analysis...................................................................60 4.1.3.1 Different Ozone Dosages................................................61 4.1.3.2 Different Rotation Speeds...............................................63 4.1.3.3 Different pH Levels...........................................................65 4.1.3.4 Different Concentrations.................................................66 4.2. Lignosulfonate.......................................................................68 4.2.1 COD Analysis.......................................................................68 4.2.1.1 Different Ozone Dosages................................................68 4.2.1.2 Different Rotaton Speeds................................................69 4.2.1.3 Different pH Levels...........................................................70 4.2.1.4 Different Concentrations.................................................71 4.2.2 TOC Analysis........................................................................73 4.2.2.1 Different Ozone Dosages................................................73 4.2.2.2 Different Rotation Speeds...............................................75 4.2.2.3 Different pH Levels...........................................................76 4.2.2.4 Different Concentrations.................................................77 4.2.3 Molecular Average Weights Analysis...............................79 4.2.3.1 Different Ozone Dosages................................................79 4.2.3.2 Different Rotation Speeds...............................................81 4.2.3.3 Different pH Levels...........................................................82 4.2.3.4 Different Concentrations.................................................84 4.3. Alkali Lignin.............................................................................86 4.3.1 COD Analysis.......................................................................86 4.3.1.1 Different Ozone Dosages................................................86 4.3.1.2 Different Rotaton Speeds................................................88 4.3.1.3 Different pH Levels...........................................................90 4.3.1.4 Different Concentrations.................................................91 4.3.2 TOC Analysis........................................................................93 4.3.2.1 Different Ozone Dosages................................................93 4.3.2.2 Different Rotation Speeds...............................................94 4.3.2.3 Different pH Levels...........................................................96 4.3.2.4 Different Concentrations................................................98 4.3.3 Molecular Average Weights Analysis...............................99 4.3.3.1 Different Ozone Dosages................................................99 4.3.3.2 Different Rotation Speeds.............................................101 4.3.3.3 Different pH Levels.........................................................102 4.3.3.4 Different Concentrations...............................................104 4.4 Comparing three Chemical Compounds.........................106 4.4.1 COD....................................................................................106 4.4.2 TOC.....................................................................................107 4.5 The Average COD and TOC Reduction per Gram of Ozone..........................................................................................109 4.5.1 The Average COD Reduction per Gram of Ozone..........................................................................................109 4.5.1.1 Different Ozone Dosages..............................................109 4.5.1.2 Different Speeds.............................................................112 4.5.1.3 Different pH Levels.........................................................115 4.5.1.4 Different Concentrations...............................................118 4.5.2 The Average TOC Reduction per Gram of Ozone........120 4.5.2.1 Different Ozone Dosages..............................................120 4.5.2.2 Different Speeds.............................................................123 4.5.1.3 Different pH Levels.........................................................126 4.5.1.4 Different Concentrations...............................................129 V. Conclusions............................................................................131 VI. References............................................................................135 Appendix A.................................................................................144 Appendix B.................................................................................151 Appendix C................................................................................158 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 臭氧結合超重力旋轉填充床處理癒創木酚與木質素磺酸 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Removal of Guaiacol and Lignosulfonates by Ozone with High-Gravity Rotating Packed Bed | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張上鎮(Shang-Tzen Chang),蕭英倫(Ing-Luen Shiau),陳嘉明(Jia-Ming Chern) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 化學需氧量,超重力旋轉填充床,重量平均分子量,臭氧,總有機碳, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | COD,High-Gravity Rotating Packed Bed,Molecular Average Weights,Ozone,TOC, | en |
dc.relation.page | 166 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.38 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。