請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16350完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳忠仁 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsing-Peng Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林星芃 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T18:10:58Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-07-18 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-07-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] Adler, N.J., and Graham, J.L., 1989. Cross-cultural interaction: the international comparison fallacy? Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, pp. 515-37.
[2] Ahuj, G., and Lampert, C.M., 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 521–543. [3] Anderson, E., 1985. The salesperson as outside agent or employee: A transaction cost analysis. Marketing Science, 4: 234–254. [4] B. Espen Eckbo, Ronald M.G., and Robert L.H., 1990. Asymmetric Information and the Medium of Exchange in Takeovers: Theory and Tests. The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 651-675. [5] Barney, J.B., 1994. Bringing managers back in: A resource-based analysis of the role of managers in creating and sustaining competitive advantages for firms. In Does management matter? On competencies and competitive advantage. The 1994 Crafoord lectures: 1-36. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, Institute of Economic Research. [6] Barney, J.B., 2002. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. [7] BARNEY, J., 1986. Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy. Management Sci., pp. 1231-1241. [8] Barney, J., 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, pp.99-120. [9] Bodnar, Gordon M., Charles T., and Joseph W., 1999. Both Sides of Corporate Diversification: The Value Impacts of Global and Industrial Diversification. Working paper, Johns Hopkins University. [10] Bourgeois, L.J., 1981. On the measurement of organisational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6:29-39. [11] Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., and Nobel, R., 2010. Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies ,41, 5–20. [12] Bromiley P., 1991. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal 34: 37–59. [13] Capron, L. and J.C. Shen., 2007. Acquisition of private versus public firms: Private Information, target selection and acquirer returns. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 891–911. [14] Chatterjee, S., 1986. Types of Synergy and Economic Value: The Impact of Acquisitions on Merging and Rival Firms. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2., pp. 119-139. [15] Cheng J., and Kesner I., 1997. Organizational slack and response to environmental shifts: the impact of resource allocation patterns. Journal of Management 23: 1–18. [16] Coase, R.H., 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica N.S., 4: 386–405. [17] Coff R.W., 1999. When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: the resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science 10(2): 119–133. [18] Cohen, W., and Levinthal, D., 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovations. Administrative Science Quarterly (35:1), pp. 128-152. [19] Cohen, W.M. and S. Klepper, 1996. Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D. The Review of Economics & Statistics 78, pp. 232-43. [20] Collis, D.J., 1991. A resource-based analysis of global competition: The case of the bearings industry. Strategic Management Journal, 12:49-68. [21] Commons, J.R., 1934. Institutional economics：Its place in political economy. New York：Macmillan. [22] Conn, R. L., A. Cosh, P. M. Guest and A. Hughes, 2005. The Impact on UK Acquirers of Domestic, Cross-border, Public and Private Acquisitions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32 (5) & (6): 815-870. [23] Copeland, T.E. and Weston, J.F., 1983. Solutions Manual for Financial Theory and Corporate Policy, seconded. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. [24] Coval, Joshua D., and Tobias J. Moskowitz, 1999. Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolios. Journal of Finance 54, 2045-2073. [25] Cyert R, March J., 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ. [26] Das, T.K., and Teng, B., 2000. A Resource-based Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management, 26: 31-61. [27] Dosi, G., 1982. Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories – a Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change. Research Policy 11(3): 147–162. [28] Dunk A, Nouri H., 1998. Antecedents of budgetary slack: a literature review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature 17: 72–96. [29] Fama E., 1980. Agency problem and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288–298. [30] French, K and J. Poterba, 1991. Investor diversification and international equity markets. American Economic Journal 81, 222-226. [31] George, G., 2005. Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 661–676. [32] Geyskens, Steenkamp, and Kumar, 2006. MAKE, BUY, OR ALLY: A TRANSACTION COST THEORY META-ANALYSIS. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, No. 3, 519–543. [33] Grant, R.M., 1996b. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109-122. [34] Grant, R., 1995. A Knowledge-Based Theory of Inter-Firm Collaboration. Academy of Management - Best Paper Proceedings, pp. 17-21. [35] Grant, R.M., 2002. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications. (4th edition), Blackwell: Malden, MA. [36] Gugler, K., Mueller, D.C. and Yurtoglu, B.B., 2003. The Impact of Corporate Governance on Investment Returns in Developed and Developing Countries. The Economic Journal, 113 (November), pp. F511-F539. [37] Hamel G. and Prahalad C.K., 1994. Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, Massachusetts. [38] Hansen, R., 1987. A theory for the choice of exchange medium in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business 60, 75-95. [39] Harrigan, K.R., 1988. Joint Ventures and Competitive Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), pp. 141-158. [40] Harris, M., C.H. Kriebel, and A. Raviv, 1982. Asymmetric Information, Incentives and Intrafirm Resource Allocation. Management Science, 28(6): 604-620. [41] Harrison, J.S., Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E., and Ireland, R.D., 2001. Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. Journal of Management, 27: 679–690. [42] Helfat, C.E., and Peteraf, M.A., 2003. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 997-1010. [43] Hoskisson, R.E., and Turk , T.A., 1990. Corporate restructuring: Governance and control limits of the internal capital market. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), pp. 459-477. [44] Hubbard, R., Palia, D., 1999. A re-examination of the conglomerate merger wave in the 1960s: an internal capital markets view. Journal of Finance 54, 1131-1152. [45] Jane Gilbert, 2005. Catching the Knowledge Wave? The Knowledge Society: what does it mean for education? [46] Jensen M., Meckling W., 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360. [47] Jiang, R.J., Q.T. Tao and M.D. Santoro, 2010. Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance. Strategic Manage. J., 31: 1136-1144. [48] Ji-Yub (Jay) Kim, and Sydney Finkelstein, 2009. The effects of strategic and market complementarity on acquisition performance: evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry, 1989–2001. Strategic Management Journal,30(6)：617-646. [49] Jones, G.R. and Hill, C.W.L., 1988. Transaction Cost Analysis of Strategy-structure Choice. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 159-172. [50] Kennedy, P., 1992. A Guide to Econometrics. Oxford: Blackwell. [51] Kiessling, T.S., and Richey, R.G., 2005. International acquisitions from a network perspective and market based competencies. Journal of Bisiness Startegies, Vol.22, No.1. [52] Klein, S., Frazier, G.L., and Roth, V.J., 1990. A transaction cost analysis model of channel integration in international markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 27: 196–208. [53] Kogut B, Zander U., 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3(3): 383-397. [54] Kusewitt, John, B., Jr., 1985. An Exploratory Study of Strategic Acquisition Factors Relating to Performance. Strategic Management Journal 6, pp. 151-169. [55] Laamanen, T. and Keil, T., 2003. Performance of Serial Acquirers：Toward An Acquisition Program Perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 663–672. [56] Lang, L., and Rene’ M. Stulz, 1994. Tobin’s q corporate diversification and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy 102, 1248-1280. [57] Lavie, Dovev, and Stewart R. Miller, 2008. Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organization Science, 19: 623-646. [58] Leibenstein H., 1969. Organizational or frictional equilibria X-efficiency and the rate of innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 83: 600–623. [59] Leonard-Barton, D., 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13:111-125. [60] Lewellen, and Wilbur, 1971. A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger, Journal of Finance 26, 521-537. [61] Litschert, R.J., and Bonham, T.W., 1978. A conceptual model of strategy formation. Academy of Management Review, 3:211-219. [62] Long, W., and Ravenscraft, D., 1993. Lbos, Debt and R&D Intensity. Strategic Management Journal (14), pp. 119-135. [63] Lu and Yao ,2006. Impact of state ownership and control mechanisms on the performance of group affiliated companies in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, volume 23, 485-503. [64] Lubatkin, M., 1987. MERGER STRATEGIES AND STOCKHOLDER VALUE. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 8, 39-53. [65] M. Harris, M., Kriebel, C.H., and Raviv, A., 1982. Asymmetric Information, Incentives and Intrafirm Resource Allocation. Management Science, Vol. 28, No. 6 (Jun., 1982), pp. 604-620. [66] Mahmood, I.P., H.J. Zhu, and E.J. Zajac, 2011. Where Can Capabilities Come from? Network Ties and Capability Acquisition in Business Groups. Strategic Management Journal 32(8), 820–848. [67] Mara Faccio and Ronald W. Masulis, 2005.The Choice of Payment Method in European Mergers and Acquisitions. The Journal of Finance Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 1345-1388. [68] Matsusaka, J.G., 1993. Takeover motives during the conglomerate merger wave. Rand Journal of Economics 24, 357-379. [69] McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D., 1997. Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 3. [70] Meyer, Margaret, Paul Milgrom, and John Roberts, 1992. Organizational Prospects, Influence Costs, and Ownership Changes. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 1 (1), 9-35. [71] Meyer, Margaret, Paul Milgrom, and John Roberts. 1992. Organizational Prospects, Influence Costs, and Ownership Changes. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 1, 9-15. [72] Miller, J.S., 2004. Problem-based learning in organizational behavior class: Solving students’ real problems. Journal of Management Education, 28, 578–590. [73] Mohr, L.B., 1969. Determinants of Innovation in Organizations. The American Political Science Review, 63(1), 111-126. [74] Morosini, P., Shane, S., and Singh, H., 1998. National cultural distance and Cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 137–149. [75] Myers, S., 1977. The Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5, 147-175. [76] Noordewier, T.G., John, G., and Nevin, J.R., 1990. Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer–vendor relationships. Journal of Marketing, 54, 80–93. [77] Palich, L.E., Cardinal, L.B., and Miller, C.C., 2000. Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 155-171. [78] Papadakis, V.M., and Thanos, I.C., 2010. Measuring the Performance of Acquisitions: An Empirical Investigation Using Multiple Criteria. British Journal of Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 859-873. [79] Peteraf, M.A., 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource based view. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 179191. [80] Pfeffer J, and Salancik G., 1978. The External Control of Organizations. Harper & Row: New York. [81] Prahalad, C.K., and Hamel, G., 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 3: 79-91. [82] Roberts, P.W. and G.R. Dowling., 2002. Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, 1077–1093. [83] Rosenzweig, P.M., and J.V. Singh, 1991. Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 340-361. [84] Sanchez, R., 1995. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 135–159. [85] Seldeslachts, 2011. Merger Failure. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Volume 20, Number 2, Summer, 589–624. [86] Shaffer, B. and A.J. Hillman, 2000. The development of business-government strategies by diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 175-190. [87] Sharfman, M., Wolf, G., Chase, R., and Tansik, D., 1988. Antecedents of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 13: 601-614. [88] Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 2003. Stock market driven acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics 70, 295-311. [89] Simon, H., 1957. A behavioral model of rational choice. New York: Wiley. [90] Singh, J., 1986. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 562-585. [91] Singh, JV, 1986. Performance, slack and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3) 562-586. [92] Slangen, A., and Hennart, J. -F., 2008. Do greenfields outperform acquisitions or vice versa? An institutional perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7): 1301–1328. [93] Song, J., and Shin, J., 2008. The paradox of technological capabilities: a study of knowledge sourcing from host countries of overseas R&D operations. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 291–303. [94] Starbuck, William H., and Bo L. T. Hedberg, 1977. Saving an organization from a stagnating environment. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. [95] Stump, R.L., and Heide, J.B., 1996. Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 33: 431–441. [96] Tan, J., and Peng, M.W., 2003.Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1249–1263. [97] Teece, D.J., Pisano, G.P., and Shuen, A., 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-533. [98] Thompson J., 1967. Organization in Action. McGraw- Hill: New York. [99] Tong, T.W., and Reuer, J.J., 2007b. Real options in strategic management. Advances in Strategic Management, 24: 3–28. [100] Vassilis M. Papadakis, and Ioannis C. Thanos, 2010. Measuring the Performance of Acquisitions: An Empirical Investigation Using Multiple Criteria. British Journal of Management, volume 21, Issue 4, pp. 859–873. [101] Viner, and Aron, 1988. Inside Japanese Financial Markets. Homewood, Dow Jones-Irwin, pp. 33-35. [102] Vorhies, D.W., Morgan, R.E., and Autry, C.W., 2009. Product-market strategy and the marketing capabilities of the firm: Impact on market effectiveness and cash flow performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1310-1334. [103] Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171-180. [104] Williamson, O.E., 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press. [105] Williamson, O.E., 1979. Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2 (Oct., 1979), pp. 233-261. [106] Williamson, O.E., 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press. [107] Williamson, O.E., 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 269– 296. [108] Woojin Kim, 2012. Investor Protection and the Mode of Acquisition: Implications for Ownership Dilution and Formation of Pyramids. Financial Management, volume 41, Issue 1, pp. 55–93. [109] YASAI-ARDEKANI, M., 1986. Structural Adaptations to Environments. Academy of Management Review, 11, 1, 9-21. [110] Zhang, Y., Li, H., Hitt, M.A., and Cui, G., 2007. R&D intensity and international joint venture performance in an emerging market: Moderating effects of market focus and ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 944-960. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16350 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著公司之成長，企業在擴張其企業版圖時，經常採用併購的方式進行。過去許多研究致力於單一併購案對於公司績效產生之影響，並運用不同理論之觀點進行闡述。然而較少文獻關注於當公司進行多次併購案後，其子公司的組合之特性對於併購績效之影響，因此本研究藉由資源基礎觀點以及交易成本理論來分析併購投資組合對公司績效之影響。
本篇研究將探究併購投資組合於產業、交易方式之分散程度對公司績效之影響，此外，加入寬裕性資源及研究發展能力為調和變數，探討其對於主要變數關係之影響。本篇研究以生技相關產業之上市公司為樣本，並利用COMPUSTAT所提供的次級資料進行迴歸分析，選取了175間主併公司，總樣本數有419筆。根據研究結果，併購投資組合之產業分散程度與公司績效的關係為倒U型，交易方式之分散程度則是與公司績效具有負向關係。本篇研究認為資源基礎理論與交易成本理論可用於解釋此研究結果，當併購組合產業之分散程度愈高，根據資源基礎觀點，主併公司可以利用併購組合內之公司的資源，提升其競爭優勢，然而當併購組合內的產業分散度越大，公司之間協調分配資源衍生之交易成本愈大，使得資源分配較無效率而降低了公司之營運績效。而當用併購組合內之交易方式分散程度愈大，整合及管理的過程中產生的成本也愈高，因而降低了公司之營運績效。此外，公司寬裕性資源及其研究發展能力在此關係中具有調和作用。 結論部分會提供本篇研究於實務上之管理意涵，並提供相關研究限制與未來研究方向等建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | As the growth of firm, merge or acquisition has been a common strategy when firms expanding the business map. There are many research have focused on evaluating performance of single acquisition in different method. However, there are few researches focus on the characteristics of the M&A portfolio when the acquiring firm engaged in multiple merge or acquisition. Therefore, we introduced the Resource Based View and the Transaction Cost Theory to compare whether diversity of the M&A portfolio will impact on the firm performance.
This study examines the relationship between the diversity of the industry and the trade term in the M&A portfolio how to impact firm operating performance. In addition, adding the moderating role of resource slack and the R&D capability. Comprehensive secondary data of the globally public biotechnology-related industries collected mainly from COMPUSTAT database supported the prediction. The overall sample size is 419 cases, including the 175 acquiring firms. From the research results, the relationship between the diversity of industry and the firm performance is inverse U-shaped. However, the trade term diversity is negatively associated with firm performance. This paper suggests the Resource Based View and the Transaction Cost Theory can provide explanations on the relationship between the diversity of M&A portfolio and firm performance. In addition, organizational slack resource as well as R&D capability plays a moderating role in the relationship of M&A portfolio and firm performance. This study also discusses the managerial implications and provides some future research limits and directions on the end. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T18:10:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99741047-1.pdf: 641965 bytes, checksum: 5dc8b0c42df89b69e15bf21653b53ce0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Research purpose 3 1.3 Research procedure 4 Chapter 2 Theory and Hypotheses 5 2.1 Literature Review 5 2.2 Theoretical Background 7 2.2.1 The Resource Based View 7 2.2.2 Transaction Cost Theory 9 2.3 Hypotheses 11 2.3.1 M&A portfolio diversity and Firm Performance 11 .2.3.1.1 M&A industry diversity and Firm Performance 11 .2.3.1.2 M&A trade term diversity and Firm Performance 13 2.3.2 Moderating role of organization factor 15 .2.3.2.1 Moderating role of organization factor－Organizational Slack 15 .2.3.2.2 Moderating role of organization factor－R&D Capability 18 Chapter 3 Research Design and Methodology 21 3.1 Research Framework 21 3.2 Data Collection and Sample 22 3.3 Variable Measurement 22 3.3.1 Dependent variable 22 3.3.2 Independent variable 23 3.3.3 Moderating variable 23 3.3.4 Control variable 24 3.4 Statistics Method 27 3.4.1 Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis 27 3.4.2 Regression analysis 29 Chapter 4 Research Results 30 4.1 Regression Analysis 30 4.1.1 Direct effect of M&A industry diversity and firm operating performance 30 4.1.2 Direct effect of M&A trade term diversity and firm operating performance 31 4.1.3 Moderating effect of organization slack 31 4.1.4 Moderating effect of R&D capability 32 4.1.5 Diagrams of moderating effect 34 Chapter 5 Conclusion and Suggestion 37 5.1 Research Conclusions 37 5.2 Managerial Implication 39 5.3 Limitation and Future Research Direction 40 Chapter 6 Reference 42 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 併購組合多樣性對公司績效之影響－寬裕性資源與研究發展能力之調和效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Relationship Between M&A Portfolio and Firm Performance－The Moderating Effect of Slack Resource and R&D Capability | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林博文,李伯謙 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 併購投資組合,產業分散度,交易方式分散度,寬裕性資源,研究發展能力, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | M&A Portfolio,Industry Diversity,Trade Term Diversity,Organization Slack,R&D Capability, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 52 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-07-03 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 626.92 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。