Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 心理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16344
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林以正(Yi-Cheng Lin)
dc.contributor.authorYu-Wen Touen
dc.contributor.author竇郁文zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T18:10:40Z-
dc.date.copyright2012-07-18
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.submitted2012-07-05
dc.identifier.citation中文部分:
黃金蘭, C., C. K., Hui, N., 林以正, 謝亦泰, Lam, B. (in press). 中文版語文探索與字詞計算字典之建立. 中華心理學刊.
英文部分:
Bailenson, J. N., & Yee, N. (2005). Digital chameleons. Psychological Science, 16, 814.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Kao, C. F., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1032.
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893.
Chartrand, T. L., & Van Baaren, R. (2009). Human mimicry. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 219-274.
Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1387.
Cialdini, R. (2001). Influence: Science and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 11, 86-89.
Gonzales, A. L., Hancock, J. T., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37, 3.
Gregory, S. W., Dagan, K., & Webster, S. (1997). Evaluating the relation of vocal accommodation in conversation partners' fundamental frequencies to perceptions of communication quality. Journal of nonverbal behavior, 21(1), 23-43.
Ireland, M. E., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching in writing: Synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 549.
Ireland, M. E., Slatcher, R. B., Eastwick, P. W., Scissors, L. E., Finkel, E. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22, 39.
Kerth, S. (2011). What makes online customer reviews helpful? A study of how language style influences the perceived helpfulness of amazin.com customer reviews. Master, Maastricht University.
Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334-339.
Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of nonverbal behavior, 27, 145-162.
Melnyk, V., & van Osselaer, S. M. J. (2012). Make me special: Gender differences in consumers’ responses to loyalty programs. Marketing Letters, 1-15.
Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75-78.
Matarazzo, J. D., & Wiens, A. N. (1972). The Interview: Research on its anatomy and structure. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
Niederhoffer, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2002). Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 337-360.
O'Toole, R., & Dubin, R. (1968). Baby feeding and body sway: An experiment in George Herbert Mead's' taking the role of the other.'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 59.
Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic Style: Language Use as an Inidividual Difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1296-1312.
Pennebaker, J.W., Booth, R.J., & Francis, M.E. (2007). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007): A computer-based text analysis program [Computer software]. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
Ramanathan, S., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Consuming with others: Social influences on moment‐to‐moment and retrospective evaluations of an experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 506-524.
Reinhard, M. A., & Messner, M. (2009). The effects of source likeability and need for cognition on advertising effectiveness under explicit persuasion. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 8(4), 179-191.
Stel, M., Blascovich, J., McCall, C., Mastop, J., van Baaren, R. B., & Vonk, R. (2010). Mimicking disliked others: Effects of a priori liking on the mimicry‐liking link. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 867-880.
Taylor, P. J., & Thomas, S. (2008). Linguistic style matching and negotiation outcome. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1, 263-281.
Tanner, R. J., Ferraro, R., Chartrand, T. L., Bettman, J. R., & Baaren, R. V. (2007). Of Chameleons and Consumption: The Impact of Mimicry on Choice and Preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 754-766.
Van Swol, L. M. (2003). The effects of nonverbal mirroring on perceived persuasiveness, agreement with an imitator, and reciprocity in a group discussion. Communication Research, 30, 461-480.
Wan, Y., Nakayama, M., & Sutcliffe, N. (2012). The impact of age and shopping experiences on the classification of search, experience, and credence goods in online shopping. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 1-14.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16344-
dc.description.abstract擬態又稱作「變色龍效應」,其定義為「人們無意識的模仿他人行為、姿態與語言的現象」。過去研究將擬態所具有的社會功能應用於說服歷程中,發現擬態可有效提升說服成功的機率。有鑑於過往研究常將各式擬態類型混和操作,本研究試圖使用語文型態匹配度作為測量工具,以單獨區分出語言擬態在說服歷程中的效果,除此之外,本研究更為首次直接在互動說服情境下進行此類型實驗的研究。作者希望確認語文型態匹配度作為語言擬態的測量工具,是否能發揮相同的社會功能,也希望藉由實驗操弄間接影響語文型態匹配度,實際了解其於說服歷程中所扮演的角色。研究一的結果發現,語文型態匹配度作為語言擬態的測量工具,的確能發揮與其相同的社會功能,即增加個人對於互動對象的喜好程度,且透過此喜好程度提高對商品的購買意圖。研究二則試圖操弄動機,希望能間接改變實驗參與者的語文型態匹配度,結果發現,實驗組與控制組之間的語文型態匹配度的確呈現顯著差異,但動機則無,另一方面,語文型態匹配度對於增加說服成功機率的現象也並未被觀察到。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractMimicry, also known as Chameleon effect, is the phenomenon that people unconsciously imitate others’ behavior, posture, and language. Past research papers showed that mimicry increased persuasion success probability effectively. Due to the fact that past researchers often mixed several types of mimicry in the same study, present work is trying to divide the effect of verbal mimicry from other types of mimicry by using Language Style Matching(LSM)as measurement. Besides, current work is the first one which processed experiment under the direct persuasion activity context. We tried to confirm the feasibility of regarding LSM as measurement for verbal mimicry, and whether LSM displayed the same social function as mimicry, furthermore, we also manipulated motivation for indirectly changing LSM so that we could explore the role it played during persuasion process. Study 1 revealed that LSM displayed the same social function as verbal mimicry, which increased participants’ degree of liking toward their partner, and further influenced their purchase intention during the promotion activity. In Study 2, we changed participants’ LSM by manipulating motivation, and result showed that the degree of LSM was significant higher in experiment group, but motivation was not; on the other hand, we did not observe the phenomenon that LSM increases persuasion success probability.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T18:10:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-101-R99227124-1.pdf: 781608 bytes, checksum: f66ae4190d0a29046f965152779694f8 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 6
第一節 擬態(Mimicry) 6
第二節 擬態與說服(Mimicry and Persuasion) 11
第三節 語言型態匹配度(Linguistic Style Matching, LSM) 16
第四節 小結與研究假設 20
第二章 研究一 24
第一節 前言 24
第二節 研究方法 24
第三節 研究結果 27
第四節 討論 29
第三章 研究二 30
第一節 前言 30
第二節 研究方法 31
第三節 研究結果 34
第四節 討論 37
第四章 綜合討論 39
第一節 研究結果總結 39
第二節 研究限制與展望 45
第五章 參考文獻 48
附錄 52
附錄一:研究一廣告文本 52
附錄二:研究二指導語 55
附錄三:研究二實驗腳本 58
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject語文型態匹配度zh_TW
dc.subject語言zh_TW
dc.subject擬態zh_TW
dc.subject說服zh_TW
dc.subjectpersuasionen
dc.subjectLanguage Style Matching(LSM)en
dc.subjectLanguageen
dc.subjectMimicryen
dc.title言語變色龍:說服與語言型態匹配度zh_TW
dc.titleLanguage Chameleon: Persuasion and Language Style Matchingen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear100-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee吳宗祐,蘇珍頤
dc.subject.keyword擬態,語言,語文型態匹配度,說服,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordMimicry,Language,Language Style Matching(LSM),persuasion,en
dc.relation.page58
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2012-07-06
dc.contributor.author-college理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept心理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:心理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-101-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
763.29 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved