請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16210
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡長林 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsuan-Hsia Tan | en |
dc.contributor.author | 談宣霞 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T18:05:11Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-10 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-07-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、 古籍
(一) 經 [先秦] 郭建勳注譯:《新譯易經讀本》,台北:三民書局股份有限公司,1996年1月,初版。 [宋] 朱熹集注,林松、劉俊田、禹克坤譯註:《四書》,台北:台灣古籍出版有限公司,2003年3月,初版八刷。 [宋] 朱熹著,黃珅校點:《四書或問》,上海:上海古籍出版社,2001年,初版。 (二) 子 [先秦] 莊子,陳冠學注:《莊子新注(內篇)》,台北:東大圖書股份有限公司,1978年2月,初版。 [宋] 張載撰,朱熹注,王雲五主編:《張子全書》,台北:台灣商務印書館,1979年,初版。 [宋] 程顥、程頤著,王孝魚校點:《二程集•卷2上》。北京:中華書局,1981年,初版。 [宋] 朱熹著,陳俊民校訂:《朱子文集》,台北:財團法人德富文教基金會,2000年。 [明] 王陽明:《王陽明全集》,台北:考正出版社,1971年,初版。 [明] 王畿著、吳震編校整理:《王畿集》。南京:鳳凰出版社,2007年。 [明] 劉宗周著,戴璉璋、吳光主編:《劉宗周全集》,台北:中央研究院中國文學研究所籌備處,1997年。 (三) 集 [明] 黃宗羲、全祖望:《宋元學案》,收入沈善洪主編:《黃宗羲全集》,浙江:浙江古籍出版社,1985-1944年。 [清] 黃宗羲著,沈芝盈點校:《明儒學案》,〈姚江學案〉,北京中華書局,2010年4刷。。 二、 近人論著 方東美:《中國哲學精神及其發展(下)》,台北:黎明文化事業有限公司,2005年,初版。 方東美:《生命悲劇之二重奏》•〈生生之德〉,台北:黎明文化公司,1979年,初版。 方東美:《華巖宗哲學•下冊》,台北:黎明文化有限公司,1981年,初版。 方東美著,孫智燊譯:《生生之德》,台北:黎明文化事業公司,1979年,初版。 王邦雄:《中國哲學史》,里仁書局,2007修訂二版。 朱承:《治心與治世──王陽明哲學的政治向度》,上海:上海人民出版社,2008年一版。 牟宗三:《中國哲學十九講》,台北:台灣學生書局,1974年台初版。 牟宗三:《生命的學問》。台北:三民書局,1978年三版。 牟宗三:《中國哲學的特質》,台北:台灣學生書局,1974年初版。 牟宗三:《心體與性體》,台北:正中書局,1970年,台修一版。 牟宗三:《王陽明致良知教》,台北:中央文物供應社,1954年初版。 佛洛姆著,莫迺滇譯,《逃避自由》,志文出版社,民國五十九年,初版。 林月惠:《詮釋與工夫──宋明理學的超越蔪嚮與內在辯證》,台北:長達印刷有限公司,2008年初版。 林啟屏:《儒家思想中的具體性思維》,台灣:學生書局有限公司,2004年初版。 韋政通:《中國哲學辭典》,台北:大林書店,1977年。 唐君毅:《中國哲學原論──導論篇》。台北:台灣學生書局,1978年台初版。 唐君毅:《中國哲學原論原教篇》,香港新亞研究所,1975年初版。 唐君毅:《中國哲學原論•導論篇》。香港:新亞研究所,1974年再版。 島田虔次:《朱子學和陽明學》,蔣國保譯,陝西師範大學出版社,1986年版。 秦家懿著,傅偉勳、韋政通主編:《王陽明》,台北:東大圖書股份有限公司,1997年三版。 張永儁:《革命哲學》,台北:國防部總政治作戰部,1985年初版。 梁漱溟:《中國民族自救運動之最後覺悟》,台北:學術出版社,1971年初版。 梁漱溟:《東西文化及其哲學》,台北:虹橋書店,1968年初版。 陳佳榮著,司馬殤編:《中國歷代之興治亂衰亂亡》,香港學津書店,1989年初版。 陳來:《有無之境──王陽明哲學的精神》。北京:新華書店。2009年初版。 陳榮捷:《朱學論集》,台北:台灣學生書局,1988年。 楊國榮:《良知與心體》。台北:洪葉文化事業有限公司,1999初版。 熊十力:《新唯識論》,台北:河洛圖書出版社,1974年台景印一版。 熊十力:《讀經示要•卷一》,台北:樂天出版社,1973年,初版。 稽文甫:《左派王學》,開明書店1934年版,《民國從書》影印本。 蔡仁厚:《王陽明哲學》,台北:三民書局,1974年初版。 鄧克銘:《王陽明思想觀念研究》,國立台灣大學出版中心,2010年7月,初版。 錢穆:《陽明學述要》,正中書局,1957年台二版。 鐘彩鈞:《王陽明思想之進展》,台北:文史哲出版社,1983年初版。 三、 外文論著 A. B. Ulanov, The Feminine in Jungian Psychology and in Christian Theology, (Eranston, | |
dc.identifier.citation | |: Northwestern University Press, 1971.)
Carl Gustav Jung. Ed. Sir Herbert Read, The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, (New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1970) Carl Gustav Jung, trans, R. F. C. Full, Two Essays on Analytical Psychology, (New York, World Company, 1956.) Chang Chung-Yuan, A Study of Chinese Philosophy, Art, and Poetry, (New York, Harper & Row, 1963.) Daisety Teitaro Suzuki, Reason and Intuition in Buddhist philosophy, The Japanese Mind, ed., C.A.Moore, (Honolulu, East-west Center Press, 1967.) E. Fromn, The Art of Loving, (New York, Harper and Row, 1956.) Eva Firkle, Woman in the Modern World, trans. Hilda Graef (Chicago: fides Publishing Association, 1956.) F. A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty (The University of Chicago Press, 1960.) F. J. J. Buytendijk, trans., D. J. arrett, Women: A Contemporary View, (New York, Newman Press and Association Press, 1968.) Jung, Mysterium Coiunctionis: An Inquiry into the Separation and synthesis of Psychic Opposites in Alchemy. Trans. R. F. C. Hull. Bollingen Series XX, Herbert Read, et al., 2nd ed. (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1970) Lou Andreas –Salome, trans,. Intro. Stanley A. Leavy, The Freud Journal of Lou Andreas-Salome, (New York, Basic Books Inc., 1964) M. Rokeach, The Nature of Human Values (New York: The Free Press, 1973) P. A. Sorokin, The Crisis of Our Age ,(New York: E. P. Dutton&Co., 1957) Robert K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure (Illinois, 1959) Sandra A. Wawrytko, The Undercurrent of Feminine Philosophy in Eastern and Western Thought, (Univ. Press of America, Inc., 1981) 四、 單篇論文 梁兆康:〈陽明學說體系探究〉,《復興崗學報》,第十六期,1977年元月。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16210 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 《就母性價值觀論陽明思想之特色》的主要論點在於,陽明思想與一些西方學者提出之「母性價值觀」(Feminine Philosophy)有其相通相契的價值意涵。因此,以母性價值觀來深入闡釋陽明思想,更可以讓我們瞭解陽明思想之深義,體會其「萬物一體」、「體用一源」特色在當代的價值。本論文分為五個章節,架構如下:
第一章緒論先概言西方工業革命成功後,物質文明一日千里,人類精神文明卻沒有相應的發展,反而受物質宰割出現漸趨弱化、物化的傾向。為什麼會造成這樣的情形?對這樣的狀況,到底有沒有什麼改善方法?本章略述渥瑞特寇(Sandra A. Warytko)所提出相對於造成現代文明困境的西方主流價值觀──「父性價值觀」(Masculine Philosophy)──的母性價值觀為解決良方。因此在本章中先透過對父性價值觀的界定幫助我們了解母性價值觀之意蘊,並由說明父性價值觀所引發的問題來探討母性價值觀在當代的價值,簡要闡明母性價值觀與中國思想傳統相契合之特質。接著詳細論述母性價值觀的兩個內涵:「含容萬有的和諧感通」、「無私化育的體用互攝」,並論述母性價值觀與陽明思想的相通之處,以及筆者之所以就母性價值觀論陽明思想之特色的研究依據。 第二章先簡要說明陽明思想之淵源,再整理陽明整體思想的主要特色,歸述為「致良知與心性天合一」、「動靜寂感與本體工夫合一」、「知行合一與人心道心合一」、「明德親民與天人合一」等四項。 第三章從母性價值觀論陽明「萬物一體」思想所具備之和諧感通的特色。首先介紹陽明「一體觀」的傳承,說明陽明「萬物一體」思想之淵源;再依據母性價值觀論析:「精神流貫、志氣通達」、「承擔天地責任」之「萬物一體」思想,展現陽明強調以和諧感通打破人己物我分隔之一體相關性思想特質。進而指出唯其一體相關,吾人才能對世間萬物的苦難感同身受,由盡己心推擴而至天地萬物,成就承擔天地責任的無私關懷。最後論述達到萬物一體的先決條件為「心外無物」:此心是感通發動處,是天理之所在,是萬物一體的基礎,更是母性價值觀的具體顯現。 第四章論陽明「體用一源」思想體用互攝的特色。「萬物一體」與「心外無物」可說是陽明的理想之境,要達到此境界須透過工夫方可實現。對於這一點,陽明有「本體工夫」之說,這表示,談工夫論所涉及之體用問題更可彰顯陽明思想的整體精神,以及其與母性價值觀之會通。故本章首先探究陽明思想體用一源的特色,說明陽明係就本心上作工夫,此工夫不從支離現象上修本體,而只求「無私」即可成聖的工夫論。再論述體用一源思想與母性價值觀的契合,明白二者都是講求形上形下、本體現象、工夫境界合一的思想。 第五章則為結論,總結本研究所得心得成果,並藉諸學者對形成當代文明困境的論見,說明母性價值觀對人類文明正向發展的可能貢獻,並且由母性價值觀與陽明思想的通契中彰顯陽明思想的當代價值。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The main idea about On the Characteristics of Wang Yang-Ming From the Point of View of Feminine Philosophy is that there are the very values in common between Western Feminine Philosophy and Wang Yang-Ming’s Philosophy. Therefore, we are able to realize the further implications of Wang Yang-Ming’s Philosophy by the examination of Feminine Philosophy to experience the features regarding contemporary values of “The whole as One” and “One Same Origin.” This thesis can be divided into very five chapters as follows:
Chapter 1, Introduction, is discussing about why is the man kind spiritual civilization going from bad to worse? Instead of promotion, but degradation after the Industrial Revolution, why does the material civilization make a lot of progress? What has happened? Are there some improvements for this situation? This chapter generally talks about Sandra A. Warytko who had argued that the western mainstream value, Masculine Philosophy is the leading factor which resulted modern civilization in dilemmas, and the Feminine Philosophy is the very one solution to these dilemmas. This chapter will not merely help us understand the internal implications of Feminine Philosophy through the definition and explanation concerning Masculine Philosophy but the questions about the values of Feminine Philosophy contemporarily resulted from Masculine Philosophy as well. Furthermore, it will definitely imply the specifications which both fit in with Feminine Philosophy and Chinese traditions. There are two implications of Feminine Philosophy which are specifically “harmonious, concordant sympathy in all-in-one-ness” and “applied receptions for selflessness.” Also, this thesis will talk about the certain concepts in common between Feminine Philosophy and Wang Yang-Ming’s Philosophy and as far as the writer myself is concerned, the reasons for the study of the thesis, On the Characteristics of Wang Yang-Ming From the Values of Feminine Philosophy, are the basis of the very thesis. Chapter 2 will explain the origin of Wang Yang-Ming’s Philosophy in brief. Then soon look back upon the main ideas of Wang Yang-Ming’s Philosophy which are mainly about ” That one can have knowledge without/prior to corresponding action,” and “That one can know what is the proper action, but still fail to act.“ Wang Yang-Ming held that objects do not exist entirely apart from the mind because the mind shapes them. He believed that it is not the world that shapes the mind, but the mind that gives reason to the world. Therefore, the mind alone is the source of all reason. He understood this to be an inner light, an innate moral goodness and understanding of what is good. Wang Yang-Ming's rejection of the investigation of knowledge comes from the fact that at the time the traditional view of Chinese thought was that once one gained knowledge, one had a duty to put that knowledge into action. Chapter 3 will discuss the characteristics of Wang Yang-Ming’s “The Whole as One” by the discourses of Feminine Philosophy. At the very beginning of Chapter 3, it will introduce the descent or inheritances of the Confucian school’s “One perspective” and make sure about the origin of “The Whole as One” initially. Next, according to the Feminine Philosophy then, it will analyze the connotations of Wang Yang-Ming’s “The Whole as One” which are mainly about “Spiritual streams and brainstorming ideologies combine the whole as one,” and “The Whole as One with the universal responsibilities” to put the certain emphasis on the selfless concern for anything all over the world. Eventually, the absolute prerequisite for the achievement of “The Whole as One” is nothing more than “Nothing beyond Minds,” which means the truth within, the foundation of “The Whole as one” and the concrete practices of the Feminine Philosophy as well. Chapter 4 will talk about the characteristics of “One Same Origin.” As for Wang Yang-Ming, “The Whole as One” and “Nothing beyond Minds” can be referred to Wang Yang-Ming’s Utopia. Meanwhile, the pragmatic questions involving in the efforts correspond with both the Wang Yang-Ming’s and Feminine Philosophy. Hence, Chapter 4 will initially conquer the features concerning the concepts of Wang Yang-Ming’s “The Same Origin” and “The Same Origin” does not refer to the ontologically fragmented phenomena but the efforts for being Saint with “selflessness.” Then Chapter 4 will discuss about the correspondences between the philosophy of “The Whole as One” and Feminine Philosophy which their own ideological significances are simply philosophical, ontological and epistemological phenomena. Chapter 5 is the conclusion of this thesis which concludes the study and does not only highlight the probable devotions of Feminine Philosophy toward human beings’ civilization but the contemporary price for the compatibility both between Wang Yang-Ming’s and Feminine Philosophy as well. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T18:05:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R98121003-1.pdf: 1581314 bytes, checksum: 3bcb653baa9b71bf638c40ee92c3fc09 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 緒論 .........................................................................................1
第一節 研究動機與目的..............................................................1 第二節 母性價值觀的界定與內涵..............................................4 第二章 陽明思想淵源與特色..............................................................21 第一節 陽明思想的淵源................................................................21 第二節 陽明思想的特色................................................................26 一、致良知與心、性、天合一.....................................................26 二、動靜寂感與本體工夫合一......................................................33 三、知行合一與人心道心合一......................................................40 四、明德親民與天人合一.............................................................48 第三章 陽明「萬物一體」思想與母性價值觀.....................................56 第一節 陽明「一體觀」的傳承.......................................................56 第二節 陽明「萬物一體」思想........................................................64 一、 精神流貫、志氣通達...................................................65 二、 承擔天地責任...............................................................73 三、 心外無物.......................................................................81 第四章 陽明「體用一源」思想與母性價值觀........................................88 第一節 陽明「體用一源」思想要義...............................................88 第二節 陽明「體用一源」特色與母性價值觀..............................96 第五章 結論..........................................................................................101 參考文獻................................................................................................113 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 就母性價值觀論陽明思想之特色 | zh_TW |
dc.title | On the Characteristics of Wang Yang-Ming From the Point of View of Feminine Philosophy | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 呂妙芬,林維杰 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 母性價值觀,王陽明,萬物一體,體用一源,和諧感通, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Feminine Philosophy,Wang Yang-Ming,all-in-one-ness,sympathy,selflessness, | en |
dc.relation.page | 117 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-07-26 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 中國文學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 中國文學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.54 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。