請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15866完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 洪一薰(I-Hsuan Hong) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chung-Han Lien | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 連鈞瀚 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T17:54:02Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-13 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Alwisy, A., BuHamdan, S., Gül, M. (2019). Evidence-based ranking of green building design factors according to leading energy modelling tools. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, 101491. Agrawal, V., Ferguson, M., Toktay, L. B., Thomas, V. M. (2012). Is Leasing Greener Than Selling? Management Science, 58, 523-533. Axen, J., Kurani, K. S. (2013). Hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric—What do car buyers want? Energy Policy, 61, 532-543. Bansala, S., Gangopadhyay, S. (2003). Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 333-355. Cremer, H., Gahvari, F., Ladoux, N. (1998). Externalities and optimal taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 343–364. Cremer, H., Gahvari, F., Ladoux, N. (2003). Environmental taxes with heterogeneous consumers: an application to energy consumption in France. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2791–2815. Chelly, A., Nouira, I., Frein, Y., Hadj-Alouane, A. B. (2018). On the consideration of carbon emissions in modelling-based supply chain literature: the state of the art, relevant features and research gaps. International Journal of Production Research, 1-28. Chen, Z., Su, S. I. (2019). Social welfare maximization with the least subsidy: Photovoltaic supply chain equilibrium and coordination with fairness concern. Renewable Energy, 132, 1332-1347. Fan, J., He, H., Wu, Y. (2016). Personal carbon trading and subsidies for hybrid electric vehicles. Economic Modelling, 59, 164-173. Hughes, R. (2017). The EU Circular Economy package – life cycle thinking to life cycle law? Procedia CIRP, 61, 10-16. Hess, S., Fowler, M., Adler, T., Bahreinian, A. (2012). A joint model for vehicle type and fuel type choice: evidence from a cross-nested logit study. Transportation, 39(3), 593–625. Hoen, A., Koetse, M. J. (2014). A choice experiment on alternative fuel vehicle preferences of private car owners in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 61, 199–215. Ho, T. H., Lim, N., Camerer, C. F. (2005). Modeling the Psychology of Consumer and Firm Behavior with Behavioral Economics. Journal of Marketing Research. Helveston, J. P., Liu, Y., Feit, E. M., Fuchs, E., Klampfl, E., Michalek, J. J. (2015). Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China. Transportation Research Part A, 73, 96 - 112. Huang, J., Leng, M., Liang, L., Liu, J. (2013). Promoting electric automobiles: Supply chain analysis under a government’s subsidy incentive scheme. IIE Transactions, 45(8),826-844. Hackbarth, A., Madlener, R. (2016). Willingness-to-pay for alternative fuel vehicle characteristics: a stated choice study for Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 89–111. Huffman, D., Maurer, R., Mitchell, O. S. (2019). Time discounting and economic decision-making in the older population. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 14, 100121. Hanumante, N. C., Shastri, Y., Hoadley, A. (2019). Assessment of circular economy for global sustainability using an integrated model. Resources, Conservation Recycling, 151, 104460. Janssens, G., Zaccour, G. (2014). Strategic price subsidies for new technologies. Automatica, 50, 1999-2006. Kao, T. F., Du, Y. Z. (2019). A study on the influence of green advertising design and environmental emotion on advertising effect. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118294 Keith, C., Mao, Z. (2015). Costs of selected policies to address air pollution in China. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Kőszegi, B., Rabin, M. (2006). A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 1133-1165. Kwon, Y., Son, S., Jang, K. (2018). Evaluation of incentive policies for electric vehicles: An experimental study on Jeju Island. Transportation Research Part A, 116, 404-412. Lombardini, C. (2005). Optimal tax policy under environmental quality competition. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 317–336. Liu, Y., Quan, B., Xu, Q., Forrest, J. Y. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and decision analysis in a supply chain through government subsidy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 436-447. Li, Q., Xiao, T., Qiu, Y. (2018). Price and carbon emission reduction decisions and revenue-sharing contract considering fairness concerns. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 303-314. Li, Y., Zhan, C., Jong, M., Lukszo, Z. (2016). Business innovation and government regulation for the promotion of electric vehicle use: lessons from Shenzhen, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 371-383 Morseletto, P. (2020). Targets for a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104553. Mussa, M., Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and Product Quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18, 301-317. Özdemir, Ö., Hobbs, B. F., Hout, M., Koutstaal, P. R. (2020). Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment: Benefits and costs for the EU power market. Energy Policy, 173, 111166. Proost, S., Dender, K. V. (2001). The welfare impacts of alternative policies to address atmospheric pollution in urban road transport. Regional Science and Urban Economics,31, 383–411 Parajuly, K., Fitzpatrick, C., Muldoon, O., Kuehr, R. (2020). Behavioral change for the circular economy: A review with focus on electronic waste management in the EU. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 6, 100035. Qiua, Y. Q., Zhoua, P., Sun, H. C. (2019). Assessing the effectiveness of city-level electric vehicle policies in China. Energy Policy, 130, 22-31. Requia, W. J., Mohamed, M., Higgins, C. D., Arain, A., Ferguson, M. (2018). How clean are electric vehicles? Evidence-based review of the effects of electric mobility on air pollutants, greenhouse gas emissions and human health. Atmospheric Environment, 185, 64-77. Samuelson, P. (1937). A Note on Measurement of Utility. Review of Economic Studies, 4, 155-161. Sovacool, B. K., Abrahamse, W., Zhang, L., Ren, J. (2019). Pleasure or profit? Surveying the purchasing intentions of potential electric vehicle adopters in China. Transportation Research Part A, 124, 69-81. Shao, L., Yang, J., Zhang, M. (2017). Subsidy scheme or price discount scheme? Mass adoption of electric vehicles under different market structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 262, 1181-1195. Tirole, J. (1990). The theory of industrial organization. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8, 162-164. Thaler, R. H. (2008). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 27(1), 15 - 25. Toshimitsu, T. (2010). On the paradoxical case of a consumer-based environmental subsidy policy. Economic Modelling, 27, 159-164. Thorne, Z., Hughes, L. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of electric vehicle subsidies in Canada. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 519-526. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292. Tan, Q., Zeng, X., Ijomah, W. L., Zheng, L., Li, J. (2014). Status of End-of-life Electronic Product Remanufacturing in China. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18, 577-587. Wang, L., Lu, J. (2019). Analysis of the Social Welfare Effect of Environmental Regulation Policy Based on a Market Structure Perspective and Consumer. Sustainability. Wang, N., Tang L., Pan, H. (2019). A global comparison and assessment of incentive policy on electric vehicle promotion. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 597-603. Xydas, E., Marmaras, C., Cipcigan L. M. (2016). A multi-agent based scheduling algorithm for adaptive electric vehicles charging. Applied Energy, 177, 354-365. Xu, C., Wang, C., Huang, R. (2020). Impacts of horizontal integration on social welfare under the interaction of carbon tax and green subsidies. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, 107506. Yang, Z., Slowik, P., Lutsey, N., Searle, S. (2014). Principles for effective electric vehicles incentive design. Zhang, X. (2014). Reference-dependent electric vehicle production strategy considering subsidies and consumer trade-offs. Energy Policy, 67, 422-430. Zhu, L., Wang, P. (2019). Study on indirect network effects on the construction of electric vehicle charging piles based on game theory analysis. Energy Procedia, 158, 3853-3858. Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Meng, Q., Luan, X. (2019). Impacts of Green Production Decision on Social Welfare. Sustainability, 11, 453. Zhu, L., Wang, P., Zhang, Q. (2019). Indirect network effects in China’s electric vehicle diffusion under phasing out subsidies. Applied Energy, 251, 113350. Zhang, L., Zhou, H., Liu, Y., Lu, R. (2019). Optimal environmental quality and price with consumer environmental awareness and retailer's fairness concerns in supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 1063-1079. Tesla台灣 (2020)。概覽。取自https://www.tesla.com/zh_TW/supercharger 行政院環境保護署 (2018)。環境資源資料開放平台【電子郵件清單訊息】。取自https://opendata.epa.gov.tw/ 林鳳琪 (2019)。台灣電動車政策急轉彎！全球四大天王臉都綠了。經濟日報。取自https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/3805095 姜唯 (2018)。空污「貧富差距」惡化 全球95%人都呼吸有毒空氣。環境資訊中 心。取自https://e-info.org.tw/node/211122 財政部賦稅署 (2017)。重要賦稅政策。取自https://www.dot.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=390 parentpath=0 財團法人資源循環台灣基金會 (2019)。循環經濟概述【部落格文字資料】。取自 https://www.circular-taiwan.org/ceintro 張凱喬 (2018)。電動車產業現況剖析與發展趨勢。2018車輛研測專刊。取自https://www.artc.org.tw/upfiles/ADUpload/knowledge/tw_knowledge_594122409.pdf 黃紹甄 (2019)。挪威電動車發展趨勢與推動策略研析。經濟部節能減碳推動辦公室2019年5月專題。取自https://www.go-moea.tw/download/message3/2019%E5%B9%B45%E6%9C%88%E5%B0%88%E9%A1%8C%E6%8C%AA%E5%A8%81%E9%9B%BB%E5%8B%95%E8%BB%8A%E7%99%BC%E5%B1%95%E8%B6%A8%E5%8B%A2%E8%88%87%E6%8E%A8%E5%8B%95%E7%AD%96%E7%95%A5%E4%B9%8B%E7%A0%94%E6%9E%90.pdf 顧荃 (2017)。防空污 賴清德：2030年公車全面電動化。中央通訊社。取自https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201712215007.aspx | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15866 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究擬分析政府補貼電動車消費者之政策成效，透過史坦柏格賽局的模型建置，以政府作為領導者先行決定給予電動車消費者的補貼金額，而電動車廠商和燃油車廠商則作為跟隨者，在觀察政府給出的補貼金額後分別決定電動車與燃油車的售價，同時也於模型中嵌入行為經濟學理論以適切描述政府補貼對於消費者購買決策的影響，最終觀察在三種不同的補貼方案下，所造成的電動車需求、社會福祉與補貼額度之差異，並發現一次性購車補助政策將得以最節省的財政支出便獲得最佳推行電動車之成效。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This research is aimed to analyze the effectiveness of the government’s subsidy policies for consumers purchasing electric vehicles via the Stackelberg game approach, in which the government acts as leader and both electric vehicle manufacturer and automobile manufacturer act as followers. The government determines the subsidy amount for consumers purchasing electric vehicles first, and both firms determine their prices simultaneously after investigating the subsidy amount that the government announces. Moreover, our research considers behavioral theories into the models in order to describe consumer behaviors while making purchasing decisions in a plausible way. Finally, we investigate three proposed subsidy policies with respect to the demand of electric vehicles, the social welfare and the optimal subsidy amount. Our study shows that one-time subsidy policy performs the best in promoting the adoption of electric vehicles with the lowest costs. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:54:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0108202023431200.pdf: 1443399 bytes, checksum: 765c03b847d454e7ca062c639582546e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2.1. 循環經濟與電動車的推行 6 2.2. 消費者行為與補貼政策 7 第三章 模型建構 11 3.1. 消費者購買車輛的效用函數之概念 12 3.2. 單位行駛距離電費折扣模型 14 3.2.1. 效用函數 16 3.2.2. 需求函數推導 17 3.2.3. 電動車廠商與燃油車廠商之利潤函數 18 3.2.4. 政府的目標函數 22 3.3. 期定額稅賦減免模型 27 3.3.1. 效用函數 28 3.3.2. 需求函數推導 29 3.3.3. 電動車廠商與燃油車廠商之利潤函數 30 3.3.4. 政府的目標函數 32 3.4. 一次性購車補助模型 34 3.4.1. 效用函數 34 3.4.2. 需求函數推導 35 3.4.3. 電動車廠商與燃油車廠商之利潤函數 36 3.4.4. 政府的目標函數 38 第四章 模型比較與敏感度分析 40 4.1. 各補貼政策模型之比較 40 4.2. 相關參數之設定 43 4.3. 補貼政策模型之敏感度分析 44 4.3.1. 時間貼現因子和消費者對於車輛機動性的偏好於補貼額度的影響 45 4.3.2. 獲益因子和損失因子對於一次性購車補助政策的影響 48 4.3.3. 政府最佳購車補助額度與電動車售價間的比重關係 53 4.4. 分析結果之總結 54 第五章 結論與未來研究方向 56 參考文獻 58 附錄 65 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 行為理論於推行電動車之補貼政策研析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Subsidy Policies of Promoting Electric Vehicles with Consideration of Behavioral Theories | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭財吉(Tsai-Chi Kuo),鄧志峰(Jr-Fong Dang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 賽局理論,行為理論,補貼政策,電動車,損失厭惡, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | game theory,behavioral theory,subsidy policy,electric vehicles,loss aversion, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 66 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202002208 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-03 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 工業工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0108202023431200.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.41 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。