Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15742Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 謝德宗 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chih-Lan Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王芝蘭 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T17:51:08Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-10-08 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-10-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
一、中文文獻 謝德宗、俞海琴 (2007)《金融機構管理》,台北滄海書局。 丁敏(2010),《日本如何增進「共享式增長」》,《價值中國網》。 大竹文雄(2005),《日本的不平等:格差社會幻想之未來》,日本經濟新 聞出版社。《APEC通訊》5月號,電子報第128期。 朱美麗(2010),《經濟人權-個人轉業不易,租稅負擔欠公平》,《2010 台灣人權指標調查手冊》,財團法人中華人權協會。 李顯峰、陳紹容(2003),《台灣地區經濟成長與政治變遷之研究》,桃園: 國立中央大學台灣經濟發展中心論文。 沈恩 (Sen) 著,劉楚俊譯 (2001),《自由與正義基礎》,《經濟發展與自 由》,台北:先覺出版。 林正峰(2007),《國家快樂力》,《商業週刊》第1000期。 徐如賓(2012),《亞洲國家包容性成長的發展》,《經建會綜合計劃處》。 莊奕琦、趙振瑛(1999),《人力資本與經濟成長外生性檢定與因果分析- 以台灣實證為例》。 陳玉珮(2000),《學校實施人權教育的原則及教學內容》,《中導教育第 52卷第4期》。 陳旭昇(2007),《時間序列分析:總體經濟與財務金融之應用》,台北:東 華書局。 陳界良(2011),《摩坦森:再拼第二個諾貝爾獎》,《中國時報》。 彭堅汶(2012),《經濟人權的理念與省思》,《人權教育諮詢暨資源中心》, 教育部。 楊洲松(2005),《人權教育與師資培育》,台北:五南書局。 蔡鴻飛(2010),《捍衛經濟人權》,台灣生活黨。 顏厥安(2010),《論經濟人權的觀念與體系》,財團法人法律扶助基金會。 鐘惠民、周賓凰、孫而音(2011),《財務計量:Eviews的運用》,台北:新 陸書局。 經建會綜合計畫處(2010),《討論歐盟「Europe2020」策略》。 經建會綜合計畫處(2010),《新加坡未來10年經濟發展策略》。 二、英文文獻 Ali, I. (2007).Inequality and the imperative for inclusive growth in Asian. Working paper. Ali, I. and H. H. Son(2007).Measuring inclusive growth. Asian Development Review, 24:1, 11-31. Ali, I., and J. Zhuang(2007). Inclusive Growth Toward a Prosperous Asia: Policy Implications, ERD Working Paper Series No. 97, Asian Development Bank. Almeida, R. (2007).Local economic structure and growth, Spatial Economic Analysis, 2:1, 65-90. Asian Development Bank(2006).Special Chapter on Measuring Policy Effectiveness in Health and Education,in Key Indicators 2006,Manila. Asian Development Bank(2007).Inequality in Asia, in Key Indicators 2007,Manila. Asian Development Bank(2008).Strategy 2020. Manila: ADB. Asian Development Bank(2011).Framework of Inclusive Grow Indicators: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2011 Special Supplement. Baumol, W.T.(1967).Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth:the Anatomy Of Urban Crisis,American Economic Review,57:3,415-426. Chaudhuri, S., and M. Ravallion(2007).Partially Awakened Giants Uncover Growth In China and India, In L. Alan Winters and S. Yusuf, eds., Dancing with Giants: China, India, and the Global Economy. The World Bank , Washington, DC. Engle, R.F. and C.W.J. Granger(1987).Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing, Econometrica, 55, 251-276. Felipe, J., and R. Hasan , eds.(2006). Labor Markets in Asia: Issues and Perspectives. London: Palgrave MacMillan for the Asian Development Bank. Johnson, H. (1995)Economic Expansion and International Trade, The Manchester School And Economic Studies,23,95-112. Krugman, P.(2010)Learning from the Europe,New York Times. McKinley,T.(2010).Proposing Indicators for Monitoring Inclusive Growth. Intial Notes.Center for Development Policy Research, School for Oriental and African Studies at the University of Landon. OECD(2008).Growing Unequal?:Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries,COUNTRY NOTICE:JAPAN. Rauniyar, G and R. Kanbur(2010). Inclusive Development: Two Papers on Conceptualization , Application, and the ADB Perspective. January draft. Independent Evaluation Department, ADB. UNESCO(2009).Global Monitoring Report: Overcoming Marginalization. Paris: UNESCO. World Bank (2006a).India Inclusive Growth and Service Delivery:Building on India’sSuccess. Development Policy Review Review Report No. 34580, Washington , DC. World Bank (2006b). World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development, Washington , DC. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15742 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 「經濟成長」、「經濟發展」是否對「經濟人權」、「人權發展」有其正面效益?本文研究主題包括:探討「經濟成長」對「經濟人權」與「人權發展」的影響?追求「經濟人權」對增益「包容性成長」的影響。驗證台灣經濟成長率、失業率與GINI係數三者間的互動關係,探討如何實踐「均富」政策目標。
本文首先檢視攸關人權的定義、包容性成長內涵與經濟人權發展背景和國外對幸福指數的定義,其次回顧「經濟發展」對「經濟人權」相關性的文獻。後續利用單根檢定、向量自我迴歸模型(VAR)、Granger因果關係檢定、衝擊反應分析等計量方法針對探討台灣經濟成長率、失業率與Gini係數三者之間的互動關係,用於探討「經濟成長」對「經濟人權」的影響,進而驗證台灣「包容性成長」的情況。可歸納出下以結論: 在Granger因果關係中顯示對「包容性成長」的各變數間存在:(1) 經濟成長率和失業率存在雙向因果關係。 (2) 失業率和Gini係數存在雙向因果關係。(3) 經濟成長率和Gini係數沒有明顯因果關係。在向量自我迴歸模型分析(VAR)中顯示經濟成長率不具有習慣性,經濟成長率高時將伴隨低失業率,且方向明確,經濟成長會改善貧富差距,亦即當台灣出現高經濟成長率時,人們享有經濟成長果實會增加,經濟人數將會上升。失業率不具有習慣性,高失業率(失業者的所得消失)將導致貧富差距擴大亦即失業率攀昇將讓人們喪失所得來源,導致所得分配不均,經濟人數將會下降。Gini係數正向領先經濟成長率,兩者關係密切,但方向不明確。Gini係數負向領先失業率,兩者關係密切,但方向不明確。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Does “economic growth” or “economic development” have a positive impact on “economic human rights” or “human rights development?” This paper discusses the impact of “economic growth” on “economic human rights” and “human rights development,” as well as the impact of “economic human rights” on “inclusive growth.” It analyzes the interaction among economic growth rate, unemployment rate and GINI coefficient, probing into how to achieve equitable distribution of wealth.
The paper first discusses the definition of human rights, inclusive growth, the development of economic human rights and the overseas definition of “happiness.” Then it reviews the literature related to impact of economic development on economic human rights. The researcher then uses quantitative methods such as Unit Root Test, Vector Autoregressive Model(VAR), Granger Causality Test and Impulse Response Analysis to shed light on the interaction among economic growth rate, unemployment rate and Gini coefficient. It then explores the impact of economic growth on economic human rights, showing the inclusive growth in Taiwan. The results are as follows: Granger Causality Test shows that: (1) There is a two-way causal relationship between economic growth rate and unemployment rate. (2) There is a two-way causal relationship between unemployment rate and Gini Coefficient. (3) There is no significant causal relationship between economic growth rate and Gini Coefficient. VAR shows that economic growth rate does not involve habitual tendency. The increase of economic growth rate leads to lower unemployment rate, which in turn shortens the gap between the rich and the poor. Unemployment rate does not involve haibtual tendency. High unemployment rate will lead to the widening distribution of wealth. Gini Coefficient positively leads economic growth rate, the two closely related with the direction unclear. Gini Coeffieient negatively leads unemployment rate, the two closely related with the direction unclear. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:51:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-P99323007-1.pdf: 1424130 bytes, checksum: 10240967cc9699f81f0b8d8371254907 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………………i 誌謝…………………………………………………………………………ii 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………iv 目錄………………………………………………………………………vi 表目錄……………………………………………………………………viii 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………ix 第一章 導論………………………………………………………………1 1.1 研究背景與動機……………………………………………………1 1.2 研究目的…………………………………………………………3 1.2 研究架構…………………………………………………………4 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………6 2.1 人權概念……………………………………………………….…..6 2.1.1 人權的型態……………………………………………………6 2.1.2 人權觀念的演進………………………………………………7 2.1.3 經濟人權的探討………………………………………………9 2.2 包容性成長………………………………………………………11 2.2.1 包容性成長的內涵與衡量指標………………………………13 2.2.2 包容性成長的文獻探討………………………………………14 2.2.3 包容性成長與國民幸福指數………………………………17 第三章 實證模型的建立……………………………………………….21 3.1 實證研究方法…………………………………………………21 3.1.1 單根檢定……………………………………………………..21 3.1.2 Granger因果關係檢定…………………………………………23 3.1.3 向量自我回歸模型(VAR)………………………………………25 3.1.4 衝擊反應分析…………………………………………………25 3.2 資料來源與變數處理………………………………………………25 3.3 相關性分析………………………………………………………30 第四章 實證模型與資料說明……………………………………………….31 4.1 單根檢定…………………………………………………………31 4.2 Granger因果關係檢定……………………………………………33 4.3 向量自我迴歸模型分析(VAR)……………………………………34 4.4 衝擊反應涵術分析………………………………………….37 第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………40 5.1 結論………………………………………………………………40 5.2 後續研究建議……………………………………………………40 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………42 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 經濟成長 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Gini係數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經濟人權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 包容性成長 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 幸福指數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 失業率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Gini Coefficient | en |
| dc.subject | economic growth | en |
| dc.subject | economic human right | en |
| dc.subject | inclusive growth | en |
| dc.subject | happiness index | en |
| dc.subject | unemployment rate | en |
| dc.title | 台灣包容性成長與經濟人權之實證研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Inclusive Growth and Economic Human Rights:
Evidence from Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李顯峰,黃淑惠 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 經濟成長,經濟人權,包容性成長,幸福指數,失業率,Gini係數, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | economic growth,economic human right,inclusive growth,happiness index,unemployment rate,Gini Coefficient, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 44 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-10-03 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 經濟學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf Restricted Access | 1.39 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
