Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計與管理決策組
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15706
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor劉順仁
dc.contributor.authorPa-Chun Wnagen
dc.contributor.author王拔群zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T17:50:27Z-
dc.date.copyright2013-01-16
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.submitted2012-12-10
dc.identifier.citation中文部份
中央健康保險局(2007)•實施醫療給付改善方案,全民健保照護成效顯著•全民健康保險雙月刊,67,8-11。
王玫(2008,3月4日)• 各國健保制度比一比•瀏覽日期2012年6月12日,取自http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=6&menu_ id=168&WD_ ID= & webdata_id=1526
王淇俐(2007)•乳癌論質計酬試辦計劃初期成效分析-以南區醫療利用為例•未發表之碩士論文,私立長榮大學,台南縣,台灣。
石怡馨(2010)•加入全民健保論質計酬計畫之氣喘病患者接受中西醫療法與照護結果之相關•未發表之碩士論文,私立中國醫藥大學,台中市,台灣。
行政院衛生署(2011)•2009全民健康保險統計動向•瀏覽日期2012年6月20日,取自 http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2_2.aspx?now_fod_list_no=10238&class_no=440&level_no=1
行政院衛生署中央健保局(2006)•健保價值與醫療品質•瀏覽日期2012年6月20日,取自 http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=6&menu_id=168&WD_ID=&webdata_id=1645
行政院衛生署全民健康保險醫療品質委員會(2007)•配合二代健保之論質計酬 醫療爭議審議報導系列27•台北市:行政院衛生署全民健康保險爭議審議委員會。
余鴻彰(2010)•論質計酬對糖尿病患低血糖而急診就醫之影響•未發表之碩士論文, 私立亞洲大學,台中市,台灣。
李玉春(1996)•健康保險支付制度•健康保險(4版),楊志良(編)•台北:巨流圖書。
李玉春(2003)•建立全民健保以共同照護模式為基礎的糖尿病疾病管理計畫先導性研究•台北市:行政院衛生署委託計畫。
李明濱(2009)•再談醫療核心價值三不變:人文關懷、專業創新與醫療品質•台灣醫界,52(6),5-6
李待弟(2007)•全民健康保險糖尿病醫療給付改善方案初步影響評估•未發表之碩士論文,國立台灣大學,台北市,台灣。
李藝珈(2007)•全民健康保險子宮頸癌醫療給付改善方案對醫療院所子宮頸抹片篩檢率之影響•未發表之碩士論文, 國立陽明大學,台北市,台灣。
汪琪玲(2001)•台灣醫療市場醫師誘發需求現象之研究•未發表之碩士論文,私立實踐大學,台北市,台灣。
冼裕程(2011)•糖尿病論質計酬對醫療利用與照護成效之影響•未發表之碩士論文, 私立長榮大學,台南縣,台灣。
林佳樺(2006)•加入論質計酬之糖尿病病患其遵醫性與照護結果之相關性•未發表之碩士論文,私立中國醫藥大學,台中市,台灣。
林紹雯、柯碧玲、陳素娥、陳明琪、張雅芬(2003)•糖尿病共同照護網實施成效:中部某區域醫院為例•健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌,23,55-66。
柳奕朱(2011)•論質計酬對糖尿病病患視網膜病變診斷之影響及相關因素之探討•未發表之碩士論文,私立中國醫藥大學,台中市,台灣。
徐慧君、翁慧卿、林育慈、陳淑銘、李佩儒、李集美、劉姝妮、方淑音、張道明、蔡朝仁、李洮俊(2004)•糖尿病患介入疾病管理在經濟面、臨床面及滿意度成效評估之初探-以南部某區域醫院糖尿病病患為例•醫務管理期刊, 5(2),222-242。
張雪芬(2003)• 論質計酬試辦計畫成效初探-以肺結核疾病為例•未發表之碩士論文,私立中國醫藥大學,台中市,台灣。
莊世杰(2002)•論病例計酬對醫師診療行為之影響-以某區域教學醫院鼻中膈鼻道成形術為例•未發表之碩士論文,私立義守大學,高雄,台灣。
許惠恒(2003)•糖尿病醫療給付改善方案在某醫學中心實施成效探討•未發表之碩士論文,國立台灣大學,台北市,台灣。
連子慧(1995)•醫院醫師薪資制度等因素對疾病處置之影響-以勞保六種疾病住院病人為例•未發表之碩士論文,國立台灣大學,台北市,台灣。
郭珮君(2006)• 健康保險支付政策對於病人醫療費用之影響--以加入氣喘論質計酬方案病人為例•未發表之碩士論文,私立義守大學,高雄,台灣。
陳孟渝(2008)•醫師對於論質計酬支付制度的認知及態度研究-以糖尿病醫療給付改善方案為例•未發表之碩士論文,國立台灣大學,台北市,台灣。
陳宗泰、鍾國彪、 賴美淑(2007)•另一種流行趨勢-論成效計酬的趨勢與展望•臺灣公共衛生雜誌,26(5),353-370。
游重彥(2007)•全民健保論質計酬制度對於糖尿病患者門診醫療資源耗用影響之分析•未發表之碩士論文,國立中山大學,高雄市,台灣。
黃三桂、王悅萍、錢慶文(2002)•疾病管理對糖尿病患醫療資源耗用之影響•醫務管理期刊, 3(2),35-48。
黃明珠(2009)•財務誘因調降下之醫療利用探討-以中台灣氣喘論質計酬資料為例•未發表之碩士論文,私立東海大學,台中市,台灣。
黃達夫(2001)•用心,在對的地方•台北:天下文化。
劉立麗(2007)•全民健保乳癌試辦計畫對乳癌手術醫療利用之影響-以乳房保留手術與放射治療為例•發表之碩士論文,私立台北醫學大學,台北市,台灣。
蔡文正(2002) •全民健康保險肺結核病患醫療改善方案試辦計畫之評估•行政院衛生署九十一年度委託研究計畫。
鄭琨昌(2003)•全民健康保險制度下財務誘因對醫療行為之影響--以桃園某醫療體系為例•未發表之碩士論文,私立淡江大學,台北市,台灣。
盧瑞芬、謝啟瑞(2000)•醫療經濟學•台北:學富文化。
賴美月(2005)•探討糖尿病論質計酬改善方案對於中部某醫學中心糖尿病病患之實施效果•未發表之碩士論文,私立中國醫藥大學,台中市,台灣。
戴蘭祺(2003)•參與台灣醫療照護品質指標系列(THIS)醫院對其門診指標認知一致性評估•未發表之碩士論文,國立國防醫學院,台北市,台灣。
謝鈺婷(2007)•制度評量的計量分析:台灣結核病論質計酬專案的效果評估•未發表之碩士論文,國立中山大學,高雄市,台灣。
韓揆(1994)•醫療品質管理及門診服務品質定性指標•中華家庭醫學雜誌,13(1),35-53。

英文部份
Alshamsan R, Lee JT, Majeed A, Netuveli G, Millett C. Effect of a UK pay-for-performance program on ethnic disparities in diabetes outcomes: interrupted time series analysis. The Annals of Family Medicine 2012;10(3):228-234.

Beaulieu ND, Horrigan DR. Putting smart money to work for quality improvement. Health Service Research 2005;40:1318-34.
Birkmeyer NJ, Birkmeyer JD. Strategies for improving surgical quality--should payers reward excellence or effort? New England Journal of Medicine 2006;354:864-870.
Bonis PA. Quality incentive payment systems: promise and problems. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 2005;39(4 Suppl 2):S176-182.
British Medical Association(a). Investing in general practice - the new general medical services contract Chapter 3. Retrieved June 18, 2012, from http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf /Content/investinggp~chap3.
Calvert M, Shankar A, McManus RJ, Lester H, Freemantle N. Effect of the quality and outcomes framework on diabetes care in the United Kingdom: retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 2009;338:b1870.
Casalino LP. The unintended consequences of measuring quality on the quality of medical care. New England Journal of Medicine 1999;341:1147-1150.
Chen JY, Tian H, Juarez DT, Yermilov I, Braithwaite RS, Hodges KA,et al. Does pay for performance improve cardiovascular care in a 'real-world' setting? American Journal of Medical Quality 2011;26(5):340-8.
Doran T, Fullwood C, Gravelle H, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Hiroeh U, et al. Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. New England Journal of Medicine 2006;355(4):375-384.
Dudley RA, Talavera J, Luft HS, Frolich A, Broadhead P. Using incentives to improve quality in health care: key concepts and review of the literature. in: proceedings of buy-right for health care quality: evidence and indicators. Web Conference. Rockville, 2001-2003. MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2005.
Farh JL, Griffeth RW, Balkin DB. Effects of choice of pay plans on satisfaction, goal setting, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 1991;12(1): 55-62.
Glickman SW, Boulding W, Roos JM, Staelin R, Peterson ED, Schulman KA. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes. Medical Care 2009;47(10):1062-1068.
Glickman SW, Ou FS, DeLong ER, Roe MT, Lytle BL, Mulgund J, et al. Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. Journal of American Medical Association 2007;297:2373-2380.
Glickman SW, Schulman KA, Peterson ED, Hocker MB, Cairns CB. Evidence-based perspectives on pay for performance and quality of patient care and outcomes in emergency medicine. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2008;51(5):622-631.
Gray J, Millett C, Saxena S, Netuveli G, Khunti K, Majeed A. Ethnicity and quality of diabetes care in a health system with universal coverage: population-based cross-sectional survey in primary care. Society of General Internal Medicine 2007;22:1317-1320.
Hillman AL, Ripley K, Goldfarb N, Nuamah I, Weiner J, Lusk E. Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care. American Journal of Public Health 1998;88(11):1699-1701.
Institute of Medicine. Medicare: A strategy for quality assurance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990.
Jha AK, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine 2012;366(17):1606-1615.
Jones RS, Brown C, Opelka F. Surgeon compensation: Pay for performance, the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program, the surgical care improvement program, and other considerations. Surgery 2005;138:829-836.
Kouides RW, Bennett NM, Lewis B, Cappuccio JD, Barker WH, LaForce FM. Performance-based physician reimbursement and influenza immunization rates in the elderly. The Primary-Care Physicians of Monroe County. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1998;14(2):89-95.
Lambert RA, Larcker DF, Weigelt K. The structure of organizatinal incentives. Administrative Science Quarterly 1999;38:438-461.
Lawler EE. Outlook on compensation and benefits: Pay for performance making it work. Personnel 1988;65 (10): 68-71.
Lawler EE. Pay can be a change agent. Compensation & Benefit Management 2000:23-26.
Leapfrog Group. Leapfrog group launches national hospital rewards program. Retrieved June 20, 2012, from http://www. leapfroggroup.org/news/leapfrog_news/636854.
Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, Rothberg MB, Benjamin EM, Ma A, et al. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;356:486-96.
Lugogo NL, Kraft M. Epidemiology of asthma. Clinics in Chest Medicine 2006;27(1): 1-15.
McElduff P, Lyratzopoulos G, Edwards R, Heller RF,Shekelle P, Roland M. Will changes in primary care improve health outcomes? Modelling the impact of financial incentives introduced to improve quality of care in the UK. Quality & Safety in Health Care 2004;13:191-197.

Medicare Austrlia. Practice Incentives Program. Retrieved June 20, 2012, from http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/providers/incentives_allowances/pip/new_incentives. htm.
Mehrotra A, Pearson SD, Coltin KL, Kleinman KP, Singer JA, Rabson B, et al. The response of physician groups to P4P incentives. American Journal of Managed Care 2007;13(5):249-255.
Milgate K, Cheng SB. Pay-for-performance: the MedPAC perspective. Health Affairs 2006;25:413-9.
Millenson M. Pay for performance: the best worst choice. Quality and Safety in Healthcare 2004;13(5):323-324.
Millenson ML. Demanding Medical Excellence :Doctors and Accountability in the Information Age.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.
Millenson ML. Pay for performance:the best worst choice. Quality & Safety in Health Care 2004;13:323–324.
Pearson SD, Schneider EC, Kleinman KP, Coltin KL, Singer JA. The impact of pay-for-performance on health care quality in Massachusetts. Health Affairs 2008;27(4):1167-76.
Porter ME, Teisberg EO. Redefining health care: creating value-based competition on results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2006.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Rewarding result. Retrieved June 25, 2012, from http://www.leapfroggroup.org/RewardingResults/index.htm.
Robinson JC. Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. The Milbank Quarterly 2001;79(2):149-177.
Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Li Z, Epstein AM. Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. Journal of American Medical Association 2005;294:1788-1793.
Scott IA. Pay for performance in health care: strategic issues for Australian experiments. Medical Journal of Australia 2007;187:31-35.
Smith PC, York N. Quality incentives: the case of U.K. general practitioners. Health Affairs 2004;23(3):112-118.
Song YJ. The South Korean health care system. Japan Medical Association Journal 2009;52(3): 206-209.
Vamos EP, Pape UJ, Bottle A, Hamilton FL, Curcin V, Ng A, et al. Association of practice size and pay-for-performance incentives with the quality of diabetes management in primary care. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2011;183(12):E809-16.
Werner RM, Kolstad JT, Stuart EA, Polsky D. The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement. Health Affairs 2011;30(4):690-698.
Young GJ, Meterko M, Beckman H, Baker E, White B, Sautter KM,et al. Effects of paying physicians based on their relative performance for quality. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2007;22:872-6.
Young GJ, White B, Burgess JF, Berlowitz D, Meterko M, Guldin MR, et al. Conceptual issues in the design and implementation of pay-for-quality programs. American Journal of Medical Quality 2005;20(3):144-150.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15706-
dc.description.abstract醫療機構的績效雖然可以包括財務、流程、客戶滿意、員工成長、機構聲譽等各種面向;但總括言之,醫療機構最重要的綜合績效產出應為廣義的醫療品質;醫院的經營績效與醫護人員的工作表現如何與醫療品質相連結,是大眾關心的議題。近年來研究發現醫療給付制度與醫院績效表現有很高的關聯性,因此,依據醫院績效表現來區分保險給付等級的論調逐漸發酵,遂有論質計酬的醫療給付制度出現。台灣的全民健康保險因為單一給付系統,全國性資訊取得較容易(全民健康保險申報資料),本研究嘗試針對耳鼻喉科的單一疾病,利用全民健保險資料庫來分析慢性中耳炎住院病患的醫療品質及相關影響因素,從研究結果中獲致的資訊,探討此類資料是否足以作為未來推廣論質計酬給付制度的理論基礎。
本研究資料是利用國家衛生研究院發行之全民健康保險資料庫,選取2006年全民健康保險資料庫中診斷為慢性中耳炎之住院病患,總計5,327人,分析其醫療資源利用、手術預後及併發症、臨床治療指引遵從度之情況。採用SAS 9.1及SPSS 16.0統計套裝軟體進行資料分析,統計方法包括卡方檢定、獨立t檢定、變異數分析、複迴歸及羅吉斯迴歸分析等。
2006年慢性中耳炎的盛行率為31.6每十萬人口,總住院醫療費用為226,561,682元,平均住院天數為4.4±2.6天。在「醫療資源利用」的部份,慢性中耳炎的疾病型態、術式、年齡、合併症、醫院屬性、醫院層級、地理區域及醫院服務量是重要之影響因素;在「預後及併發症」的部份,慢性中耳炎的疾病型態及合併症是重要之影響因素,醫院的服務量並無顯著影響;在「臨床治療指引遵從度」的部份,術式及地理區域是重要的影響因素。
醫療品質是醫療機構經營最重要的績效,本研究發現,以慢性中耳炎的治療為例,地理區域、疾病型態及術式是影響疾病治療品質的重要因素。本研究發現分析以疾病為基礎的全民健康保險資料可以知道醫療提供者對於臨床指引的遵從情況,醫療資源使用及併發症等資訊,從而間接得知醫療品質狀況,但申報資料無法取得主觀的病患經驗。未來醫療產業必須要提升醫療服務的附加價值,政府機構要能利用這些積效數據來提供適當的誘因,讓醫療院所願意投資在醫療品質促進上。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe performance of a healthcare provider can be evaluated from financial, service process, customer satisfaction, employee career development, or institutional reputation dimensions. Nevertheless, in summary, the synchronized performance output can be broadly defined as the healthcare quality a hospital delivers. It is a public concern to link healthcare quality with the hospital and care giver’s individual performance.
The performance-based payment system is becoming a popular issue lately owing to the findings that suggest hospital performances are highly associated with healthcare reimbursement. Some has advocated in adopting the so called pay-for-performance payment system.
Taiwan’s National Healthcare Insurance is a nation-wide, single-payer system that is able to provide valuable national healthcare information from its claim database. In this case study, we use the National health insurance data to investigate the healthcare quality and outcomes confounders of chronic otitis media surgery. Aim of this study is to explore the feasibility of pay-for-performance system based on the information found by our analyses.
In this study, we study 5,327 surgical admissions for chronic otitis media from 2006 National Healthcare Insurance Research Database (NHIRD, provided by the Taiwan’s National Healthcare Research Institute with permission). We analyze the medical resource utilization, surgical outcomes, complication, and clinical guideline provider adherence. We use the SAS 9.1 and SPSS 16.0 statistics softwares to conduct Chi-square, independent t-test, variance analysis, multiple, and logistic regressions.
The 2006 incidents of chronic otitis media was 31.6 per 100,000 population, with total healthcare expenditure of NTD$ 226,561,682 and average hospitalization days of 4.4±2.6. The disease pattern, surgical type, age, complication, hospital type, hospital level, geographic area, and service volume are significant “medical resources utilization” predictors. The disease pattern and comorbidity, rather than service volume, are significant “outcomes” and “complication” predictors. Surgical type and geographic area are significant predictors for “clinical provider adherence”.
Healthcare quality is the most important performance of healthcare provider; we found geographic area, disease pattern, and surgical type are significant predictors for chronic otitis media surgery quality. The disease-based NHIRD provides indirect quality information such as clinical provider adherence, medical resource utilization, and complication. However, the claim data is not able to demonstrate the patient experiences to the healthcare services they received. Our study suggests that healthcare providers should dedicate to improve the value of healthcare; at the mean time, the government should provide sufficient incentive to encourage healthcare providers for quality investment.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:50:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-101-P99744004-1.pdf: 833965 bytes, checksum: f2d0e7b48612dfadd2ac4420d2150034 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書 1
誌 謝 II
中文摘要 III
英文摘要 V
目錄 VII
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 IX
第一章 緒論 2
第一節 研究背景 2
第二節 研究目的 7
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 我國全民健康保險支付制度演進 8
第二節 論質計酬支付制度的興起-背景 13
第三節 論質計酬支付制度初步成效 15
第三章 研究方法 25
第一節 研究設計 25
第二節 資料收集方法 26
第三節 研究變項與操作型定義 27
第四節 統計方法 30
第四章 結果 31
第一節 慢性中耳炎之市場規模 31
第二節 慢性中耳炎之醫療資源利用 34
第三節 慢性中耳炎之預後與併發症 45
第四節 慢性中耳炎之臨床治療指引遵從度 48
第五節 慢性中耳炎治療之預後與併發症影響因素 58
第五章 討論 61
第一節 簡述研究結果 61
第二節 醫療機構品質績效 62
第三節 研究限制 66
第六章 P4P設計芻議-研究結果外推可能 68
第七章 結論 71
第八章 推論與建議 72
參考文獻 73
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title慢性中耳炎手術論品質計酬的可行性評估zh_TW
dc.titleFeasibility of Pay-for-Performance – Chronic Otitis Media Surgery Case Studyen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear101-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee鄭守夏,朱炫璉
dc.subject.keyword慢性中耳炎,醫療品質,績效指標,醫療資源使用,併發症,臨床治療指引,遵從度,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordchronic otitis media,healthcare quality,performance index,medical resource utilization,complication,clinical practice guideline,provider adherence,en
dc.relation.page80
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2012-12-10
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計與管理決策組zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計與管理決策組

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-101-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
814.42 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved