請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15683
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭伯壎 | |
dc.contributor.author | Tsen-Lu Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林岑璐 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T17:49:58Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-02-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-01-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎(2007)。組織認定與企業倫理。見鄭伯壎、姜定宇、鄭弘岳(主編):「組織行為研究在台灣:回顧與展望」(二版),頁378-404。臺北:華泰文化。
胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。見姚美華、胡幼慧(編):「一些質性方法上的思考」,頁141-158。臺北:巨流圖書公司。 鄭伯壎、黃敏萍(2008)。實地研究中的案例研究。見陳曉萍、徐淑英、樊景立、鄭伯壎(編):「組織與管理研究的實證方法」,頁225-258。臺北:華泰文化。 Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263-295. Ashforth, B. E. 2001. Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34, 325-374. Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-Perception Theory. In B. Leonard (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. Volume 6, pp. 1-62). New York, NJ: Academic Press. Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2006). Identity, identification, and the relationship through social alliances. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 128-137. - 70 - Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment [Article]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 1701-1719. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NJ: Academic Press. Bryman, A. (1989). Research methods and organisation studies. London, England: Unwin Hyman. Carmeli, A., Cohen-Meitar, R., & Elizur, D. (2007). The role of job challenge and organizational identification in enhancing creative behavior among employees in the workplace. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 75-90. Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505 Carroll, A.B. (1990). Chivas regal report on working Americans: Emerging values for the 1990s. Wall Street Journal, 10, p.B6 Carroll, A.B. (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39-48 Cheit, E.F. (1964). The business establishment. New York, NJ: Wiley. Cheney, G. (1983). On the various changing meanings of organization membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2, 70-76 - 71 - Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263. Etzioni, A. (1961). A Comparative analysis of complex organizations, New York, NJ: Free Press Foa, U. G. & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Thomas. Foil, C. M. (2001). Revisting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27, 691-699. Frank-Altson, M. (2001). The influence of community service/ volunteer work on perceptions of job satisfaction, job motivation, and organization commitment on employees in a manufacturing plant (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania. Frederick, W.C. (1978). From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business and society thought [Working Paper 279] Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Freud, S. (1922). Group psychology and the analysis of ego. New York, NJ: Norton. Gaettner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common group identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 271–290. Geroy, G. D., Wright, P. C., & Jacoby, L. (2000). Toward a conceptual framework of employee volunteerism: An aid for the human resource manager. Management Decision, 38, 280-286. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777-798. - 72 - Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140. Horowitz, M. J. (1988). Introduction to psychodynamics: A new synthesis. New York, NJ: Basic Books Kim, H.R., Lee, M., Lee, H. T., & Kim, N. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee-company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 557-569. Louis, M.R. (1985). Surprise and sense-making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251. Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123. McGuire, J. W.(1963). Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill. Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B. F. (1992). Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research. (pp. 3-28). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Muller, A., & Kraussl, R. (2011). The value of corporate philanthropy during times of crisis: The sensegiving effect of employee involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 203-220. O' Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocail behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492-499. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system, Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Patchen, Martin. (1970). Participation, achievement, and involvement on the job. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice- Hall. - 73 - Peterson, D.K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business and Society, 43, 296-319. Pratt, M. G. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway Distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 456-493. Rousseau, D. M. (1998). Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 217-233. Sherif, M. & Sherif, C. W. (1969). Social psychology, New York, NJ: Harper and Row. Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. T. H., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1051-1062. Stebbins, S. J. (1989). The influence of community service volunteer work on perceptions of job satisfaction and organizational commitment among Oregon employee of Pacific Bell Northeast (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Oregon State University, Oregon. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990) . Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience and role behavior: A theory and research example, In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds). Personality, roles, and social behavior (pp.192-218). New-York, NY: Springer-Verlag. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. Studies in the social psychology of intergroup Relations. London, England: Academic Press. Tajfel. H. (1982) Instrumentality identity and social comparisons. In H. Tajfel (Ed). - 74 - Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 483-507). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed.) (pp.7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall. Tuker, D. (2009). How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 189-204. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J. & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171–191. van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 357-371. Weick. K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Wiley, M. G., & Alexander, C. N. (1987). From situated activity to self attribution: The impact of social structural schemata. In K. Yardley, & T. Honess, (Eds). Self and identity: Psychosocial perspective, (pp. 105–117). London, England: Wiley. Yin, R. K. (1993). Application of case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Yurchisin, J. L. (2007). The relationship among salesperson appearance, employee-organization identification, job involvement, and job performance in the context of an apparel retail store. Dissertation Abstracts International,Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 67, 3073. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15683 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去研究顯示員工參與公司的活動,特別是一些社區服務的活動能夠有效的達成自我概念的轉變,進而引發深層認同。儘管過去員工參與公司志工服務的研究已有一些成果,但少有學者說明此活動對員工心理與行為的影響,更遑論其形塑之歷程。為了彌補此一缺口,本研究目的為了解員工參與志工服務的過程中會發生什麼樣的認知轉變,並如何達到深層組織認同的狀態。本研究採用質化研究中的深度訪談作為資料收集方法,並恪守鄭伯壎與黃敏萍(2008)的案例內分析步驟,共訪談17名員工。研究結果發現,員工參與公司志工服務方案之過程可分成四階段,其組織認同亦產生四階段的質變:形象認同、契合認同、內化認同及整合認同。初次參與階段透過知覺到組織正面形象而產生形象認同。在持續參與的過程中,員工透過服務對自我產生新認定,且亦對組織價值觀進行再認定;這兩者的再認定具有相似性而產生契合認同。於主動邀約階段,員工重新思考公司推行此服務之意義,而產生再建構過程,此認知過程可幫助員工內化組織價值觀。最後,若員工同時具備有主管身分,基於前一階段已了解公司推行此服務之意涵及公司價值觀,在與工作不衝突之下,員工會統籌計劃活動邀請其同事、部屬參加;而在這過程中,個人自我實現達到最高峰,並且會將組織價值觀與個人其他面相結合而達到整合認同。最後根據研究結果進一步討論理論與實務意涵、研究限制及未來研究方向。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Previous studies showed that when employees participate company's activity, especially for some community service activity which named corporate volunteer program(CVP), it can change their self-concept. Furthermore, it can also enhance their deep organizational identification. Although, some studies started to focus on CVP, it still lacks evidence to show how does it affect employee's behavior and their thought, not to mention its process. To understand this, this study aimed to explore what kind of cognition will happen during CVP, and how does it shape employee's deep-structured organizational identification. The study adopt deep interview of qualitative research as data collection's method, total has 17 subjects. The result showed that CVP affects on organizational identification can be divided into 4 stages:image identification, fit identification, internalization identification, and integrated identification. At the first stage, employee can perceived organization positive image so that enhance their image identification. At the second stage, through this program,employee can rebuild their new identity; at the same time, they can also reconstruct organization's value. These two new identities, can help employee rethink why company wanted to promote this activity, this process we named it as 'reconstruct'. As employee has this reconstruction during his/her process of CVP, he/she can achieve internalization identification. At the end stage, if employee change their role during this period, such as to become a manager, as they had internalized company's value and why company wanted to promote it. Without the conflict between work and participating CVP, they will conduct a CVP and also invite their colleagues, subordinates. At this period, they can achieve self-actualization, and will integrate organization's value and themselves. Lastly, this study also provided the contributions of the findings, theory contributions and managerial implications. Limitation and future research directions are also discussed. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:49:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R99227127-1.pdf: 1900903 bytes, checksum: eddc1877a4cacf42fe3d6de0b8009021 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 i
摘要 iii 英文摘要 v 第一章 緒論 - 1 - 第二章 文獻回顧 - 5 - 第一節 員工參與公司志工服務方案 - 6 - 第二節 組織認同的意涵 - 10 - 第三節 雙重組織認同. - 13 - 第三章 研究方法 - 19 - 第一節 研究設計 - 19 - 第二節 研究對象 - 19 - 第三節 研究方法 - 22 - 第四節 資料分析方法- 24 - 第四章 研究結果 - 29 - 第一節 打破印象:價值認識 - 29 - 第二節 取得連結:價值認同 - 34 - 第三節 深信不疑:價值內化 - 43 - 第四節 合而為一:價值整合 - 47 - 第五章 討論與建議- 55 - 第一節 研究結果總結- 55 - 第二節 組織認同形塑歷程 - 58 - 第三節 員工參與公司志工服務方案之意涵 - 63 - 第四節 研究限制與未來研究方向 - 64 - 第五節 管理實務意涵- 65 - 參考文獻 - 69 - 附錄一:訪談大綱 - 75 - 附錄二:員工參與公司志工服務方案事例與向度分類 - 77 - 第一節 打破連結:價值認識 - 77 - 第二節 取得連結:價值認同 - 97 - 第三節 深信不疑:價值內化 - 133 - 第四節 合而為一:價值整合 - 142 - | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 員工參與公司志工服務方案對組織認同之影響: 一項歷程觀點探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Influence of Employee Participates Employee Volunteer Program on Organizational Identification: A View of The Process | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 任金剛,李志鴻,姜定宇 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 組織認同,組織認同形塑,員工參與公司志工服務方案,質化資料, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | organizational identification,organizational identification shaping,corporate volunteer program,qualitative data, | en |
dc.relation.page | 147 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-01-24 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.86 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。