Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15662
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鍾國彪(Kuo-Piao Chung) | |
dc.contributor.author | Shieh-Lien Su | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蘇雪蓮 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T17:49:37Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-03-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-01-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部份
鄧小雅(1999)。地區教學以上醫院推行品管圈活動之主觀成效及其影響因素之探討。碩士論文。臺北:國立台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所。 孟曉惠(2004)。品管圈活動成效與困難相關因素探討。碩士論文。臺北:臺北醫學大學護理學研究所。 蔡耀宗(2008)。員工讓品管圈活動得到更好的效果。品質月刊,44 (8),9-12。 郭信智、李來涼(2004)。護理品管圈實施成效之影響因素-以台灣南部醫院為例。醫務管理期刊,5(1),p34 -55。 邱文達、楊哲銘、郭乃文、陳依琪、陳香蓉(2001)。品管圈推動情境因素及成效評估探討。醫務管理期刊,2(3),85-95。 林秀櫻(2007)。組織文化、品改善與策略管理變革-一個公立醫院的縱貫性研究個案。碩士論文。雲林:國立雲林科技大學企業管理研究所。 曾振盛(2001)。推動品管圈活動績效之探討-以中華電信公司為例。碩士論文。高雄:國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。 蔡嘉韡(2004)。醫院採行品質管理活動與醫院績效關係之縱貫性研究。碩士論文。臺北:臺北醫學大學醫務管理學系。 蔡嘉韡、王佳惠、郭乃文(2006)。醫院品質管理活動數量與績效關係之研究。北市醫學雜誌,3(5),480-489。 劉佩芬、謝碧晴、蘇慧芳(2006)。醫品管圈的團隊結構與衝突處理行為。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,25 (6),449-461。 何宛青(2009)。探討醫院推行品管圈的發展趨勢─以醫療品質獎為例。碩士論文。臺中:亞洲大學健康暨醫務管理學系。 李政修(1999)。灣省政府衛生辦理省屬醫療院所與縣市衛生局八十七年度品管圈各品管圈與整體效益評估及應用。行政院衛生署中部辦公室,1999,1-2。 陳銘樹、魏慶國、趙婉(2007)。醫院品管圈活動之推動成效探討,亞東學報,6(27),133-144。 廖素玲(2007)。醫院推行品管圈之醫療品質影響成效研究 ─以財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會之參賽圈為例。碩士論文。雲林:國立雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士班。 廖素玲、趙正敏、鄭博文(2012)。醫院推行品管圈之醫療品質影響成效研究。醫療品質雜誌,6(5),50-58。 洪素英、謝碧晴、蘇慧芳(2005)。團體觀點:醫院品管圈之結構與效能。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,24(2),173-183。 林雅雯(2010)。以創新擴散理論探討健康促進醫院之創新歷程與影響因素。醫護科技期刊,12(4),293-254。 李銘尉、蔡錦裕(2007)。創新擴散理論模式之應用-以MP3隨身聽產業為例,資訊管理學報,14(2期),27 -48。 翁瑞宏、邱柏松、黃金安(2006)。市場與組織因素對醫院技術創新多元性之影響。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,25(5),372-383。 黃智彥、張文龍、李蕙玲、賴明信(2011)。以社會網絡分析驗證稻米產業的創新擴散。東吳經濟商學學報,73,69-110。 李亭亭、施玉珊(2009)。運用創新擴散理論於促進護理資訊系統之推展。護理雜誌,56(3),18 -22。 洪新原、張碩毅、許凱筑、張益誠(2010)。從創新擴散觀點探討影響企業採用協同商務技術之因素。臺大管理論叢,20(S1),29 -68。 鄭清和(2001) 。品管圈活動之管理績效實證研究。碩士論文。臺中:長榮管理學院經營管理研究所。 彭台光、高月慈 、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異: 問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-79。 英文部份 Abp-Alhol,T.R.,Ismail,M. Y.,Sapuan,S.M,&Hamdan,M.M.(2006).Effects of quality circel participation on employee perception and attitude in five Malaysian companies. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 65(12),970-976. Alexander, J. A., Weiner, B. J., and Griffith, J. (2006). Quality improvement and hospital financial performance. Journal of Organizational Behaviour ,27, 1003–1029 . Alexander, J. A., Weiner, B. J., Shortell, S. M., & Baker, L. C. (2007). Does quality improvement implementation affect hospital quality of care? Hospital Topics, 85(2), 3-12. Ahire, S.L. and Ravichandran T. (2001).An Innovation Diffusion Model of TQM Implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(4), 445-464. Bryan J. Weiner, Jeffrey A. Alexander, Stephen M. Shortell, Laurence C. Baker, Mark Becker, and Jeffrey J. Geppert(2006). Quality Improvement Implementation and Hospital Performance on Quality Indicators. Health Research and Educational Trust, 41(2), 307-334. Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. JAMA ,280, 1000-5. Chong, P.S., Calingo, L., Reynolds, G.L., Fisher, D.G. (2003). Using an innovative approach to shorten coaching and assessment time when applying the Baldrige health care criteria for performance excellence in a substance abuse treatment setting. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell, 14(10):947–955 Chung, K.P. and Yu, T.H. (2012). Are quality improvement methods a fashion for hospitals in Taiwan? International Journal for Quality in Health Care ,24( 4), 371–379. Evans JR, Lindsay WM (2009) Managing for quality and performance excellence. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason. Finney JW, Willenbring ML, Moos RH (2000) Improving the quality of VA care for patients with substance-use disorders: the quality enhancement research initiative (QUERI) substance abusemodule. Med Care 36,105–113 Green, T.J. (2012). TQM and organisational culture: How do they link? Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(2), 141-157. Griffin, R. W.(1988). Consequence of Quality Circles in an Industrial Setting: A Longitudinal Assessment. The Academy of management Journal,31(2),338-358. Ioannidis, G., Papaioannou, A., Thabane, T., Gafni, A., Hodsman, A., Kvern, B., Walsh, A., Jiwa, F. and Adachi, J.D. (2009). The utilization of appropriate osteoporosis medications improves following a multifaceted educational intervention: the Canadian quality circle project (CQC) .BMC Medical Education, 9(54). Ioannidis, G., Papaioannou, A., Thabane, L., Gafni, A., Hodsman, A., Kvern, B., Johnstone, D., Plumley, N., Baldwin, A., Doupe, M., Katz, A ., Salach, L., Adachi, J.D., (2007). Canadian Quality Circle pilot project in osteoporosis - Rationale, methods, and feasibility. Canadian Family Physician, 53, 1694-1700. Jones, M. C., Cline, M. & Ryan, S. (2006). The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants. Strategic Information Systems, 9(2/3),129-154. Kwong, G.D. (2000). Coaching, Staffing with Quality Circle & in F.A.D.E approach, ICQCC 2000。 Lee, L.C, Yang, K.P.and Chen,T.Y.(2000).A quasi-experimental study on a quality circle program in a Taiwanese hospital. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 12(5), 413-418. Lee, D. (2012). Implementation of quality programs in health care organizations. Springer-Verlag,(6),387-404. Lemieux-Charles, L., Murrary, M., Baker, G. R., Barnsley, J., Tasa, K., & Ibrahim, S. A. (2002). The effect of quality improvement practices on team effectiveness: a meditational model. Journal of quality in Health Care, 13(2), 89-97. Lundblad, J. P.(2003). A review and critique of Dogers, diffusion of innovation theory as it applies to organizations. Organization Development Journal, 21(4),50-64. McGrath, C. & Zell, D. (2001) The future of innovation diffusion research and itd implications for management: A conversation with Evertt Rogers. Journal of Management Inqutry, 10(4),386-391. Murray, T. A. (2007). Innovation in nursing education-Which trends should you adopt? Nurse Educator, 32(4), 154-160. Painter, M.W., Lavizzo-Mourey, R. (2008). Aligning forces for quality: a program to improve health and health care in communities across the United States. Health Aff, 27(5):1461-1463. Roger, E.M. (2003).Diffusion of innovations. Mexico:Everett M. Rogers. Raposo, M.L., Alves, H.M., Duarte, P.A. (2009). Dimensions of service quality and satisfaction in healthcare: a patient’s satisfaction index. Serv Bus: Int J 3(1):85–100 Wensing, M., Broge,B., Kaufmann-Kolle, P., Andres, E. and Szecsenyi, J. (2004) . Quality circles to improve prescribing patterns in primary medical care:what is their actual impact? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10( 3),457-466. Wensing, M., Broge ,B., Riens, B., Kaufmann-Kolle, P., Akkermans, R.,Grol, R. and Szecsenyi, J.(2009). Quality circles to improve prescribing of primary care physicians.Three comparative studies. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety , 18, 763-769. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15662 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 研究目的
透過此研究探討醫療機構推行品管圈後對個人層面、單位層面及組織層面所產生之效益與非預期效益、品管圈推行模式與成效上差異,並藉由品管圈在機構推行擴散情形驗證創新擴散理論。 研究方法 本研究以全面品質管理�持續性品質改善相關之品質改善活動與組織績效間關係的探討,計畫編號:NSC 97-2410-H-003-020針對全台灣醫院進行問卷分析,以前述計畫問卷資料作延伸,以多層次分析探討醫院品管圈推行之效益與非預期效益。深度訪談醫策會第一至第十二屆醫品圈競賽獲獎優質醫院北部三家醫學中心,收集品管圈推行情形、推行摸式,探討品管圈在機構推行效益與擴散情形。 研究結果 本研究結果顯示品管圈推動效益包含「個人學習與成長效益」、「個人獎勵與表揚效益」、「圈員互動效益」、「圈活動單位效益」、「品管圈推行非預期效益」及「整體組織成效」。個人層次、單位層次及組織層次各層級變項與品管圈推動成效有關。不同個人層次背景、不同單位層次品管圈推行狀態及不同組織層次特性與品管圈推動成效有差異。 品管圈推行預期效益為對於個人成長有所助益、改善單位服務品質,提升品質觀念、提升醫院聲望與知名度、提升內部顧客或外部顧客滿意度。品管圈的推動對個人能力及組織效能之提昇有正面影響。非預期效益部份則認為品管圈推行會造成參與人員的工作負荷加重增加工作壓力,品管圈推行有助於個人成長,也有助於個人職務升遷。在圈員互動效益方面則因為參與品管圈使團隊成員在團隊與個人情誼上關係更緊密,間接可促進單位內良好工作氣氛,提升員工士氣。 建議 建議品管圈推動醫院在品管圈加強教育訓練辦理。將教育訓練時數、品管圈參與與績效獎勵或升遷制度結合。並建立院內建立良好的支持制度及品質政策以助於品管圈推行效益,品管圈活動之推行與院內其它品質活動結合有計畫推動展開到相似單位提升品管圈推行成效。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose
The purpose of this study was found the effect of Quality Circle implementation. How it would impact on personal level, group level and organization level and what is the intended and unintended consequence. Verify the theory of innovation diffusion through this study Quality Circle implement in medical institutions. Method Data collections were applied by questionnaire “Total Quality Management and Continuous Quality Improvement Activities to Quality Improvement and the relationship between organizational performance. Plan number: NSC 97-2410-H-003-020 and analysis data with Multi-Level Analysis. Depth interview five people who work in the Medical Center in Taipei that won the Healthcare Quality Improvement Campaign frequently. Results The research results of Quality Circles to advance benefits include 'personal learning and growth benefits' and 'personal reward and recognition of benefit', 'interactive benefits', 'circle activity benefit', 'QC circle introduced the non-expected benefits' and 'overall effectiveness'. Different personal backgrounds, different units levels quality management implementation status and different organizational levels and promote the effectiveness of tube was mixed. Quality circle implementation intended consequence help for personal growth, improved quality of service, enhance quality, improve the reputation and visibility, improve internal customers or external customers satisfaction. Quality control circles promote personal abilities and enhance the positive impact of organizational effectiveness. Unintended benefits part of the quality control circle is considered implemented resulting in increased participant workload increased work pressure, quality control implemented contribute to personal growth, as well as personal title promotions. Because participation in interactive efficient quality control circle the team members on the team and personal friendship relations closer, indirectly promotes good working atmosphere within your organization, improve employee morale. Recommendations Provide more education and training for Quality circle. Establish good support system and quality policy introduced in Quality Circle, implementation of QC circle activities and other quality in activities promoting the scheme to a similar unit to promote implementation. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:49:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R99848031-1.pdf: 1068451 bytes, checksum: 69d9c01680e9b30bab6ce01ed415153e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I
中文摘要 II ABSTRACT IV 目錄 VI 表目錄 VII 圖目錄 X 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節研究目的 2 第二章文獻探討 3 第一節 品管圈定義 3 第二節 品管圈推行模式 6 第三節品管圈推行成效 8 第四節 創新擴散理論 13 第三章 研究方法 18 第一節 研究架構 18 第二節 研究假說 20 第三節 研究變項與操作定義 21 第四節 研究對象 24 第五節 研究工具與信效度檢定 25 第六節 資料處理與分析方法 27 第四章 研究結果 28 第一節 資料回收情形與描述性統計分析 28 第二節 信效度分析 40 第三節 個人層次、單位層次及組織層次與品管圈推行成效間關係 50 第四節 品管圈推行摸式及效益探討 119 第五章 討論 133 第一節 研究結果之討論 133 第二節 品管圈推行摸式、擴散情形及效益之討論 143 第三節 研究限制 148 第六章 結論與建議 150 第一節 結論 150 第二節 建議 153 參考文獻 154 附錄 160 附錄一:施測問卷 160 附錄二:專家內容效度專家名單 165 附錄三:訪談大綱 166 附錄四:訪談同意書 167 附錄五:組織層次相關支持制度細項階層迴歸分析 168 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 品管圈推行之預期與非預期效益 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of Quality Circle Implementation | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊哲銘(Che-Ming Yang),謝碧晴(Hsieh,Pi -Ching),高靖秋(Jing-Ciou GAO) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 品管圈,預期效益,非預期效益,創新擴散理論, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Quality circle,intended and unintended consequence,innovation diffusion, | en |
dc.relation.page | 173 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-01-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
Appears in Collections: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf Restricted Access | 1.04 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.