請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15649
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃麗君(Li-Chun Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hui-Yu Chan | en |
dc.contributor.author | 詹蕙瑜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T17:49:23Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-02-21 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-02-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
1. GM基因改造科技資訊網,2010。GM基因改造科技資訊網資料庫。http://gm.coa.gov.tw 2. GMO面面觀,2005。中國農民違法偷種基改稻米2005/04/14 http://gmo.agron.ntu.edu.tw/ 3. GMO面面觀,2007。花卉育種的前景及困難 2007/02/28 http://gmo.agron.ntu.edu.tw/GMOmain8.htm 4. 行政院農委會,2012。花卉消費實用小百科-最受歡迎切花TOP10。http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=385 5. 行政院農業委員會農糧署,2011。2011年2月主要切花生產預測。台灣花卉園藝 282:8-9。 6. 余祁暐,2010。Suntory 基改花卉上市策略分析。臺灣經濟研究院生物科技產業研究中心:臺北。 7. 余祁暐、楊玉婷,2011。全球基因改造科技發展趨勢-以基改藍玫瑰為例。台灣經濟研究月刊 34(3):50-56。 8. 吳裕益,2009。結構方程模式。未出版手稿,國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系。 9. 呂適仲、呂崇銘、王內建,2001。花卉產品消費者購買行為之研究-以彰化田尾公路花園為例。休閒事業研究 9(3):1-18。 10. 林宇玲,2003。電腦恐懼的理論探究。資訊社會研究5:327-358。 11. 林秀麗,2001。基因改造蝴蝶蘭 四季皆花期。中國時報90/01/05。 12. 林孟彥(譯)(Robbins, S.P.著),2006。管理學。華泰文化:台北。 13. 伊彬、林演慶,2008。近一世紀審美實徵研究趨勢。設計學報13(2):1-29。 14. 周桂田,2005。知識、科學與不確定性-專家與科技系統的“無知”如何建構風險。政治與社會哲學評論13:131-180。 15. 邱浩政,2000。量化研究與統計分析。五南:台北。 16. 高育芸,2003。街道招牌景觀偏好之研究。碩士論文,靜宜大學觀光事業研究所:台中。 17. 孫智麗、許嘉伊、劉翠玲,2007。我國消費者對基因改造食品認知程度與接受度之調查分析。農業生技產業季刊 11:80-85。 18. 陳政忻,2011。2010年南非基改作物種植概況。食品生技27:77-81。 19. 郭華仁,2005。基改作物的全球現況與我國農作物生物科技政策。生物科技與法律研究通訊18:21-41。 20. 郭華仁,2012。全球的基改作物栽培:1996 ~ 2011。http://gmo.agron.ntu.edu.tw/product/productWorld.htm 21. 溫芳宜,2010。台灣花卉產業發展及外銷市場拓展。臺北產經 3:8-17。 22. 葉錫東,2000。基因工程作物在植物保護之應用。科學發展月刊 28:257-266。 23. 楊玉婷,2010。SUNTORY研發基改藍色玫瑰成功案例。植物種苗生技 21:46-47。 24. 楊玉婷,2012。日本三得利成功研發基改藍色百合。科技與產業新聞2012/06/05 http://agbio.coa.gov.tw/information_detail.aspx?dno=34188&ito=87&item= 25. 楊恩寰,1993。審美心理學。五南:台北。 26. 楊葆茜,1995。臺北市與臺中市家計單位花卉消費行為之分析。國立中興大學:台中。 27. 傅祖壇,2004。台灣地區基因體意向調查:基因體計畫—農業生物科技組第一波電話訪問。中央研究院調查研究專題中心:台北。 28. 傅祖壇,2007。基因體意向電訪(10):在學學生對基因改造產品的接受度。台灣基因體意向調查電子報 64。 29. 謝明憲、戴廷恩、楊智凱、王仁晃、陳思如,2009。以色列蔬菜產業發展概況。台南區農業專訓 68:1-5。 30. 臺灣經濟研究院生物科技產業研究中心,2007。臺灣基因轉殖蝴蝶蘭現況。科技與產業新聞2007/07/20。http://agbio.coa.gov.tw/information_detail.aspx?dno=30165&ito=87 英文部分 1. ABC Sience. Not all apples for the transgenic tombstone. 2004/ 05/14 http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2004/05/14/1108342.htm 2. Agarwal, A. and A. Meyer. 2009. Beyond usability: Evaluating emotional response as an integral part of the user experience. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2009: 2919-2930. 3. AHTA. 2009. About horticultural therapy. http://www.ahta.org/aboutAHTA.htm 4. Auer, C. 2008. Ecological risk assessment and regulation for genetically modified ornamental plants. Plant Science 27:255-271. 5. Azadi, H., N. Talsma, P. Ho and K. Zarafshani. 2011. GM crops in ethiopia: A realistic way to increase agricultural performance? Trends in Biotechnology 29(1): 6-8. 6. Baker, J., D. Grewal and A. Parasuraman. 1994. The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22:328-340. 7. Baltissen, R. and B.M. Ostermann. 1998. Are the dimensions underlying aesthetic and affective judgement the same? Empirical Studies of the Arts 16(2):97-113. 8. Banytė, J., E. Jokšaitė and R.Virvilaitė. 2007. Relationship of consumer attitude and brand: Emotional aspect. Engineering Economics 2(52):65-77. 9. Baron R.M. and D.A. Kenny.1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173-1182. 10. Barrett, L.F. and J.A. Russell. 1998. Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (4):967-984. 11. Batra, R. and O.T. Ahtola .1990. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters 2:159-170. 12. Batrinou, A.M., V. Spiliotis and G. Sakellaris. 2008. Acceptability of genetically modified maize by young people. British Food Journal 110(3):250 - 259. 13. Becker, L., T.J.L. Rompay, H.N.J. Schifferstein and M.Galetzka. 2011. Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Quality and Preference 22(1):17-23. 14. Bentler, P.M. and E.J.C.Wu. 1983. EQS: Windows user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software. 15. Berlyne, D.E. 1971. Aesthetics and psychobiology. East Norwalk, CT, US: Appleton-Century-Crofts Press. 16. Bloch, P.H .1995. Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response. Journal of Marketing 59(3):16-29. 17. Bloch, P.H., F.F. Brunel and T.J. Arnold. 2003. Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement. Journal of Consumer Research 29(4):551-565. 18. Bredahl, L. 1999. Consumers’ cognitions with regard to genetically modified foods: Results of a qualitative study in four countries. Appetite 33(3):343-360. 19. Chandler, S.F. and C. Sanchez. 2012. Genetic modification; the development of transgenic ornamental plant varieties. Plant Biotechnology Journal 10(8): 891-903. 20. Chang, C.-Y. and P.-K. Chen. 2005. Human response to window views and indoor plants in the workplace. HortSience 40(5):1354-1359. 21. Colquhoun, T.A., B.C.J. Schimmel, J.Y. Kim, D. Reinhardt, K.Cline and D.G. Clark. 2010. A petunia chorismate mutase specialized for the production of floral volatiles. Plant 61:145-155. 22. David, G., L.L.-Kelley, M. Barton. 2003. Technophobia, gender influences and consumer decision-making for technology-related products. European Journal of Innovation Management 6 (4):253-263. 23. Dona, A. and I.S. Arvanitoyannis. 2009. Health Risks of Genetically Modified Foods. Food Science and Nutrition 49(2):164-175. 24. Donovan, R.J. and J.R. Rossiter. 1982. Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing 58:34-57. 25. Donovan, R.J., J.R. Rossiter, M.Gilian and A. Nesdale. 1994. Store atmosphere and purchasing behavior.Journal of Retailing 70(3):283-294. 26. Corcobado G., M.A. Rodriguez-Girones, E.D. Mas and J.Moya-Larano. 2010. Introducing the refined gravity hypothesis of extreme sexual size dimorphism. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10:236. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/236 27. Ekici K. and Y.C. Sancak. 2011. A perspective on genetically modified food crops. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6(7):1639-1642. 28. Etcoff, N. 2010. Flowers boost morning moods. http://www.flowerpossibilities.com/2010/08/flowers-morning-moods-study/ 29. EU business. 2011. EU tightens control of Chinese rice over GM fears. http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/china-biotech-food.diq 30. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 31. Flynn D. 2010. Student Guide to SPSS. Unpublished lecture. Department of Biological Science: Barnard College. 32. Fornell, C. and D.F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18:39-50. 33. Fournier, S. 1998. Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 24(4): 343-353. 34. Fredrickson, B.L. 2001. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. AmPsycho 56(3):218-226. 35. Ganiere, P., W.S. Chern, and D. Hahn. 2006. A continuum of consumer attitudes toward genetically modified foods in the United States. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 31(1):129-149. 36. Ghasemi, S., E. Karami and H. Azadi. 2012. Knowledge, attitudes and behavioral intentions of agricultural professionals toward genetically modified (GM) foods: A case study in southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-012-9383-6/fulltext.html 37. Goldsmith, R.E. and C.F. Hofacker. 1991. Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 19(3):209-221. 38. Goldsmith, R.E., L.R. Flynn, and E.B. Goldsmith. 2003. Innovative consumers and market mavens, Journal of Marketing 11(4):54-64. 39. Hanzaee, K.H. and M. Khanzadeh. 2011. Investigation of the effect of consumption emotions on Ssatisfaction and word of mouth communications. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 9(5):566-571. 40. Haroldsen, V.M, G. Paulino, C.Chi-ham and A.B. Bennett. 2012. Regulatory status of transgrafted plants is unclear. California Agriculture 66(2):68-69. 41. Hair, J. F., B. Black, B. Babin, R.E. Anderson and R.L. Tatham. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Macmillan. . 42. Hartman, J.B., K.C. Gehrt, and K. Watchravesringkan. 2004. Re-examination of the concept of innovativeness in the context of the adolescent segment: Development of a measurement scale. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 12(4):353-365. 43. Haviland-Jones, J., H.H. Rosario., P. Wilson and T.R. McGuire. 2005. An environmental approach to positive emotion: Flowers. Evolutionary Psychology 3:104-132. 44. Hirschman, E.C. 1980. Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research 7(3):283-295. 45. Hirschman, E.C. 1981. Symbolism and technology as sources for the generation of innovations. Advances in Consumer Research 9:537-541. 46. Hirschman, E.C. and M.B. Holbrook.1982. Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions. Journal of Marketing 46(3):92-101. 47. Holak, S.L. and W.J. Havlena. 1998. Feelings, Fantasies, and Memories: An examination of the emotional components of nostalgia. Journal of Business Research 42:217-226. 48. Holbrook, M.B. and R. Batra. 1987. Toward a standardized emotional profile (SEP) useful in measuring responses to the nonverbal components of advertising. In: Sidney H. and W.S. David (eds.). Nonverbal Communications in Advertising, D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA. 49. Huettl, V. and H. Gierl. 2012. Visual art in advertising: The effects of utilitarian vs. hedonic product positioning and price information. Marketing Letters 23(3):893-904. 50. Ittelson, W.1973. Environmental perception and contemporary perceptual theory. New York: Seminar Press. 51. Izard, C.E. 1977. Human Emotions. New York: Plenum Press. 52. James, C. 2008. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2008. ISAAA Brief No. 39. ISAAA: Ithaca: NY. 53. James, C. 2011. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2011. ISAAA Brief No. 43. ISAAA: Ithaca: NY. 54. Jordan, P. 1998. Human factors for pleasure in product use. Applied Ergonomics 29(1):25-33. 55. Kawamata, S. 2012. Experimental evaluation of the anti-attachment effect of microalgal mats on grazing activity of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus in oscillating flows. J Exp Biol 215:1464-1471. 56. Kim, R.B. 2012. Consumer attitude of risk and benefits toward genetically modified (GM) foods in South Korea: Implications for food policy. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics 23(2):189-199. 57. Kline, R.B. 2010. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press. 58. Klingeman, W. and C. Hall. 2006. Risk, trust, and consumer acceptance of plant biotechnology: Implications for genetically modified ornamental plants. Journal of Crop Improvement 18(1-2):451-486. 59. Klingeman, W., B. Babbit and C. Hall. 2006. Master gardener perception of genetically modified ornamental plants provides strategies for promoting research products through outreach and marketing. HortScience 41(5):1263-1268. 60. Klingeman, W.E., G.V., Pettis and S.K., Braman. 2009. Lawn Care and Landscape Maintenance Professional Acceptance of Insect- and Disease-resistant Ornamental Plants. HortScience 44(6):1608-1615. 61. Kotler, P. 1994. Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 62. Kubovy, M. 2000. Visual aesthetics. New York: Oxford. 63. Lewis, C.A. 1995. Human health and well-being: the psychological, physiological, and sociological effects of plants on people. ActaHorti 391:31-39. 64. Lahteenmaki L, K. Grunert, O. Ueland, A. Astrom, A. Arvola and T. Bech-Larsen. 2002. Acceptability of genetically modified cheese presented as real product alternative. Food Quality and Preference 13:523-533. 65. Laviea, T. and B.Tractinsky. 2004. Assessing dimensions of perceived visualaesthetics of web sites. Inernational Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60:269-298. 66. Lynn, M. and J. Harris. 1997. The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale. Psychology & Marketing 14(6):601-616. 67. Magnussonf M.K. and U.-K. K. Hursti. 2002. Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Appetite 39(1):9-24. 68. Massarani, L. and I.de C. Moreira. 2005. What doBrazilians think about transgenics? In Brossard D., J. Shanahan and T.C. Nesbitt.(eds.). The media, the public and agricultural biotechnology. CABI. 69. Maritain, J. 1966. Beauty and imitation. In M. Rader. (ed.). A modern book of Esthetics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 70. McLaughlin, J., P. Rosen, D. Skinner and A. Webster.1999. Valuing Technology: Organisations, culture and change. London: Routledge. 71. Mehrabian, A. and J.A. Russell.1974. An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press. 72. Mehrabian, A. and J.A. Russell. 1977. Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. Journal of Research in Personality 11:273-294. 73. Midgley, D.F. and G.R., Dowling.1978. Innovativeness: the concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research 4(4):229-242. 74. Miller, K. 2005. Communications theories: perspectives, processes, and contexts. New York: McGraw-Hill Press. 75. Moon, P. and D.E. Spencer. 1994. Aesthetic Measure. Applied to Color Harmony.Journal of the Optical Society of America 34(4):234-242. 76. Moon, J. and Kim, Y. 2001. Extending the TAM for a World Wide Web Context. Information & Management 38: 217-230. 77. Moriarty, R.T. and T.J. Kosnik. 1989. High-tech marketing: Concepts, continuity, and change. Sloan Management Review 30:7-17. 78. Nishiura, H., H. Imai, H. Nakao, H. Tsukino, MA. Changazi, GA. Hussain, Y. Kuroda and T. Katoh. 2002. Ascaris lumbricoides among children in rural communities in the Northern Area, Pakistan: Prevalence, intensity, and associated socio-cultural and behavioral risk factors. Acta Trop 83:223-231. 79. Nishihara, M. and T. Nakatsuka. 2011.Genetic engineering of flavonoid pigments to modify flower color in floricultural plants. Biotechnol Lett 33:433-441. 80. Nohl, W. 2001. Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception–preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics. Landscape and urban planning 54:223-237. 81. Paarlberg, R.L. 2001. The politics of precaution: Genetic modified crops in developing countries. Baltimore and London: Hopkins University. 82. Park, S.H., R.H. Mattson and E.Kim. 2004. Pain tolerance effects of ornamental plants in a simulated hospital patient room. ActaHort. 639:241-247. 83. Park, C.W., B.J. Jaworski and D.J. Maclnnis. 1986. Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing 50(4):135-145. 84. Parsons, R. 1991. The potential influences of environmental perception on human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11(1):1-23. 85. Parsons, R. and T.C. Daniel. 2002. Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning 60(1):43-56. 86. Petty, R.E., J.T., Cacioppo and R. Goldman. 1981. Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41:847-855. 87. PinⅡ, B.J. and J. Gilmore. 1998. The experience economy. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press. 88. Poortinga, W. and N. Pidgeon. 2007. Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnology in the UK: The case of genetically modified food. p. 21-56. In: Brossard, D. (ed.). The media, the public and agricultural biotechnology. 89. Pope, G. 2001. Agricultural Biotechnology in Japan. USDA GAIN Report. http://www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200011/55678723.pdf 90. Potera, C. 2007. Blooming biotech. Nat. Biotechnol. 25:963-965. 91. Relf, D.1992. People-plant relationship. In: Simson, S.P. and M.C.Straus (eds.). Horticulture as therapy principles and practice. New York: Food Products. 92. Roehrich, G. 1995. Innovativeness hedonist et social: Proposition d'une echelle de mesure. Rech Appl Mark 9(2):19-41. 93. Rosen, L.D. and P. Maguire. 1990. Myths and realities of computerphobia: A meta-analysis. Anxiety Research 3:175-91. 94. Rosenberg, M.J.and C.I. Hovland. 1960. Cognitive, affective, and behavioural components of attitudes. In: Hovland, C.I. and Rosenberg, M.J. (eds.). Attitude organisation and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components p.1-14. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 95. Russell, J.A.1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(6):1161-1178. 96. Russell, J.A. 1993. Forced-choice response format in the study of facial expression. Motivation and Emotion17:41-51. 97. Russell, J.A .and G. Pratt.1980. A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38(2): 311-322. 98. Schifferstein, H.N.J and I. Tanudjaja. 2004. Visualising fragrances through colours: The mediating role of emotions. Perception 33:1249-1266. 99. Schmitt, B. 1999. Experiential Marketing. Journal of Marketing Management 15(1) :53-67. 100. Shen, D., M.A. Dickson, S. Lennon, C.M. Montalto and L. Zhang. 2003. Cultural influences on Chinese consumers’ intentions to purchase apparel: Test and extension of the Fishbein behavioral intentional model. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal March 21(2): 89-99. 101. Shiffler, R.E. 1988. Maximum Z score and outliers. The American Statistician 42(1):79-80. 102. Siegrist, M. 2000. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis 20(2):195-204. 103. Sjoberg, L. 2002. Attitudes toward technology and risk: Going beyond what is immediately given. Policy Sciences 4:369-400. 104. Sjoberg, L. 2004. Principles of risk perception applied to gene technology. EMBO Report 5:47-51. 105. Smith, C.N. 1968. A study of consumer opinions and practices about flowers and flowering plants. Florida State Horticultural Society. Station J. Series. 368-375. 106. Solomon, M. 2000. Consumer behaviour. A Europien perspective. p.126-153. In: Solomon M., G. Bamossy, and S. Askegaard. Prentice Hall. 107. Steel, R.G., J.H.Torrie and D.A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. Singapore: McGraw-Hill. 108. Stevens, J.P. 2007. Intermediate statistics: A modern approach. (3rd). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 109. Summers, T.A., B.D. Belleau and Y. Xu. 2006. Predicting purchase intention of a controversial luxury apparel product. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 10(4): 405-419. 110. Tanaka, J.S. 1993. Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In: Bollen K.A. and J.S. Long (eds.). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 111. Tanaka Y., F. Brugliera and S.Chandler. 2009. Recent Progress of flower colour modification by biotechnology. Int. J. Mol. Sci.10:5350-5369 112. Thompson, P.B. 2007. Ethics, hunger, and the case for genetically modified (GM) crops. Agricultural and Food Ethics 12:215-235. 113. Udovičić M., K. Baždarić, L.Bilić-Zulle, M.Petrovečki. 2007. What we need to know when calculating the coefficient of correlation? Biochemia Medica 17(1):10-5. 114. Ulrich, R.S. 1983. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. p. 88-125. In: Altman, I. and J.F. Wohlwill (eds.). Behavior and the natural environment. New York, NY: Plenum. 115. Ulrich, R.S. 2002. Health Benefits of Gardens in Hospitals. Paper for conference, Plants for People. International Exhibition Floriade 2002:1-10. 116. Veryzer Jr, R.W. 1993. Aesthetic Response and the Influence of Design Principles on Product Preferences. Advances in Consumer Research 20:224-228. 117. Wilson, A. and A. Chatterjee. 2005. The assessment of preference for balance: Introducing a new test. Empirical Studies of the Arts 23(2):165-180. 118. Wolt, J.D., P. Keese, A. Raybould, J.W. Fitzpatrick, M. Burachik, A. Gray, S.S. Olin, J. Schiemann, M. Sears and F. Wu. 2010. Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants. Transgenic Research 19:425-436. 119. Woods, W.A. 1987. Classical aesthetics and arousal theory: Implications for fine arts marketing. p. 203-239. In: R.W. Belk (ed.). Advances in Nonprofit Marketing. London: Jai Press. http://www.econis.eu/DB=1/SET=3/TTL=1/SHW?FRST=8 120. Wood, S.L. and J. Swait. 2002. Psychological indicators of innovation adoption: Cross-classification based need for cognition and need for change. Journal of Consumer Psychology 12(1):1-13. 121. Worthington, V.L. and Y. Zhao. 1999. Existential computer Anxiety and changes in computer technology: What past research on computer anxiety has missed. (abstr.).http://www.msu.edu/~worthi14/anxiety.html 122. Wu, T.Y. 2009. The effect of product forms on consumer’s pleasurable affection. Unpublicized Ph.D. thesis. Graduate School of Design: NTUST. 123. Yamane, K., Kawashima, M., Fujishige, N. & Yoshida, M. 2004. Effects of interior horticultural activities with potted plants on human physiological and mmotional status. Acta Hort 639:37-43. 124. Yue, C. and C. Hall. 2010. Traditional or specialty cut flowers? Estimating U.S. consumers’ choice of cut flowers at noncalendar occasions. HortScience 45(3): 382-386. 125. Yoo B. and N. Donthu. 2001. Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research 52(1):1-14. 126. Zhang, P. and N. Li. 2004. The importance of affective quality. Communications of the ACM 48 (9):105-108. 127. Zuckerman, M. 1979. Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15649 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 花卉對消費者而言具有美化環境、怡情養性、贈禮等消費動機。在此需求下,國內的花卉消費與需求增加,而花卉產量與品質的成長也顯示花卉作物的生產技術愈來愈發達。目前澳洲、中國、日本與臺灣等地紛紛投入基改花卉的研發,歐盟也已核准基改花卉上市;基改花卉為透過基因科技改變性狀的花卉,自基改藍玫瑰「喝采」在2009年於東京上市後,因其有別於傳統花卉的獨特顏色而獲得大眾注目。花卉提供消費者情緒、美感等情感反應,但經文獻回顧發現,消費者對基改作物存有人體健康與生態環境的疑慮。基改花卉雖非食用作物,但基改的生態疑慮是否對基改花卉產生負面影響,甚少研究對此議題進行評估,故本研究以觀賞用花卉為標的,探討消費者對基改花卉的情緒、美感與態度是否受基改科技的介入而有所影響。由於基改花卉為涉及科技的創新產品,以及考量消費者個人美感經驗對消費者的花卉美感之影響,故本研究探討創新性與美感特質對基改花卉消費者認知之影響。
本研究以2(高�低個人創新性)x2(高�低美感中心性)拉丁方格受試者內(within-subject)設計進行實驗。研究者將受試者依特質區分為四組:第一組為高個人創新性且高美感中心性者,共8位;第二組為高個人創新性且低美感中心性者,共6位;第三組為低個人創新性且高美感中心性者,共8位;第四組為低個人創新性且低美感中心者,共10位;每組受試者隨機對基改與傳統花卉進行觀賞,並填寫其情緒、美感與態度反應。量表題項參考Mehrabian & Russell情緒量表、Ajzen & Fishbein態度理論以及Birkhoff美感理論等多位學者的理論與量表制定而成,並以結構方程式的驗證性因素分析驗證本研究量表之信效度。 分析方法以成對樣本t檢定檢驗消費者對傳統花卉與基改花卉情緒、美感與態度是否具有差異;二因子多變量變異數分析(two-way MANOVA)檢視個人創新性與美感中心性是否影響消費者情緒、美感與態度。結果發現不同特質的消費者對基改花卉的認知不同:高個人創新性且高美感中心性消費者,對基改花卉的「愉悅」情緒感受比傳統花卉的「愉悅」情緒感受高,顯示個人創新性與美感中心性較高的消費者,對基改花卉的愉悅情緒反應較為強烈。且消費者創新性與美感中心性會交互作用對基改花卉消費者情緒、美感與行為意圖產生影響。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Flowers can fulfill consumers’ needs of landscaping, character-building, and gift-giving, thus the domestic consumption on floral products has been gradually increased. The growing productivity and quality also indicate that the production technology has been well-developed. Nowadays, some countries like Australia, China, Japan, and Taiwan have been joined the research and development of GM ornamental plants, and the European Union (EU) has been approved it for sale. Genetically modified flowers (GM flowers) is a kind of ornamental plants which the character was modified by genetically modification technology. And since the GM rose, Applause, has been released in Tokyo, it has been recognized by its unique color, which is different from traditional flowers. Flowers affect consumers’ emotions, aesthetics, and the other feelings, however the present studies demonstrate that consumers doubt whether the GM flowers will danger human health and ecological environment. Although GM flowers are not food crops, still there is seldom research on whether the doubt of ecology will cause a negative impression on GM flowers. Therefore, the study focuses on the issue, takes ornamental plants as research object, and explores whether genetically modification technology will affect consumers’ emotion, aesthetics, and attitude. And because the GM flower is an innovative product which involves technology, the study also explores the effects of innovativeness and centrality of visual product aesthetics (CVPA) on GM flower consumers.
2 (high/low innovativeness) x 2 (high/low CVPA) Latin square and within-subject design were both applied in the experiment. The subjects were separated into 4 groups: 8 people with high innovativeness and high CVPA, 6 people with high innovativeness and low CVPA, 8 people with low innovativeness and high CVPA, and 10 people with low innovativeness and low CVPA. Each group of subjects has randomly watched GM and traditional flowers, and wrote down their emotion, aesthetics and attitude. The questionnaire was composed of and modified the semantic differential measure of emotional state scale designed by Mehrabian & Russell, attitude theory of Ajzen & Fishbein, and Birkfoff’s aesthetic measure. And confirmatory factor analysis of structural equation model was used to approve reliability and validity. Paired-samples t test was conducted to examine whether there are differences of emotions, aesthetics, and attitude on traditional and GM flowers. Two-way MANOVA was applied to explore the effect of effects of innovativeness and CVPA on consumers’ emotions, aesthetics, and attitude. The results indicate that the different characteristic consumers have different perceptions on GM flowers. Consumers who have high innovativeness and high CVPA have higher pleasure on GM flower than traditional flower, which shows that consumers with higher innovativeness and CVPA will perform stronger pleasure emotion on GM flowers. Last, the interaction of innovativeness and CVPA will affect consumers’ emotions, aesthetics, and behavioral intentions on GM flowers. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:49:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R99630004-1.pdf: 1616042 bytes, checksum: bc39bfa4a4309c4914f09708c4ed6e8d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………………………Ⅰ
謝誌…………………………………………………………………………………...Ⅲ 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………...Ⅴ 英文摘要………………………………………………………………………….…..Ⅶ 目錄.................................................................................................................................Ⅸ 圖目錄........................................................................................................................... XI 表目錄.......................................................................................................................... XII 第一章 緒論....................................................................................................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機 ................................................................................1 第二節 研究目的..............................................................................................3 第二章 文獻探討............................................................................................................5 第一節 基改農業發展概述..............................................................................5 第二節 花卉消費行為....................................................................................13 第三節 基因科技相關文獻探討....................................................................21 第三章 研究方法.........................................................................................................31 第一節 研究架構與假設...............................................................................31 第二節 研究變項定義與衡量…………………………………..................33 第三節 問卷設計...........................................................................................35 第四節 實驗研究...........................................................................................41 第五節 資料分析方法...................................................................................50 第四章 資料分析.........................................................................................................53 第一節 結構方程模式…………………………………...............................53 第二節 受試者對傳統花卉認知與基因改造花卉認知之差異分析..........64 第三節 二因子多變量變異數分析...............................................................70 第五章 結論與建議.....................................................................................................81 第一節 研究結果與討論...............................................................................81 第二節 管理意涵...........................................................................................88 第三節 研究限制與後續研究…………………………………………......91 參考文獻.........................................................................................................................93 附錄...............................................................................................................................106 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 創新性與美感中心性對基改花卉消費者認知之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effects of Innovativeness and Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics on the Consumer Perception of GM Ornamental Plants | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳惠美(Hui-Mei Chen),高立箴(Li-Jhen Kao) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 花卉市場,花卉消費,基因改造,實驗設計, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | floral market,floral consumptions,genetically modified,experimental design, | en |
dc.relation.page | 117 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-02-01 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.58 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。