Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15412Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳郁蕙(Yu-Hui Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Heng-Wei Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張恆維 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T17:40:25Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-06 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-07-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 內政部戶政司,2020。『人口統計資料』。台北市:內政部戶政司。 本間典子、黃秋蓮、王俊豪、陳右人,2012。「台灣消費者飲茶行為對日本綠茶之知識、態度、行為之影響」,『農業推廣學報』。29期,45-70。 朱光裕,2006。「台灣消費者茶類消費與飲茶習慣調查」。中興大學食品暨應用生物科技學系所學位論文。 行政院主計總處,2019。『107年家庭收支調查報告』。台北市:行政院主計總處。 行政院農業委員會,2003。取自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=5561 print=Y。(2020/2/15) 行政院農業委員會,2019。『農業統計年報』。台北市:行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會食農教育教學資源平台,2020。取自https://fae.coa.gov.tw/theme_data.php?theme=kids_edu_topics id=50。(2020/5/3) 行政院農業委員會茶業改良場,2019。取自https://www.tres.gov.tw/theme_list.php?theme=question type=12#!。(2020/5/8) 行政院農業委員會茶業改良場,2020。取自https://www.tres.gov.tw/ws.php?id=1397。(2020/2/15) 行政院農業委員會茶業改良場,2020。取自https://www.tres.gov.tw/ws.php?id=1628。(2020/5/8) 行政院農業委員會茶葉主題館,2008。取自https://kmweb.coa.gov.tw/subject/subject.php?id=71420。(2020/5/3) 行政院農業委員會茶葉主題館,2016。取自https://kmweb.coa.gov.tw/subject/subject.php?id=363。(2020/5/3) 行政院農業委員會茶葉主題館,2020。取自https://kmweb.coa.gov.tw/subject/subject.php?id=7252。(2020/2/22) 吳亮宜、孫璐西,2004。「茶與健康」,『科學發展月刊』。384期,18-23。 吳瑞華、謝建正、傅安弘,2007。「手搖茶飲之消費風險認知與消費行為」,『輔仁民生學誌』。23卷,1期,47-62。 李幸芳、黃炳文,2017。「茶消費者對茶葉產地證明標章認知、知覺價值及購買意願之研究-以中南部茶產區為例」,『台灣農學會報』。18卷,2期,144-160。 周孟嫻,2014。「善用多元策略 再現台茶風華-我國茶葉加值策略分析」,『臺灣經濟研究月刊』。37卷,3期,34-41。 林郁蓁,2019。「臺灣茶企業品牌溝通元素對消費者茶品牌心智與品牌權益之影響」。碩士論文,國立臺灣大學生物產業傳播暨發展研究所。 林震岩,2006。「多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用」,台北市:智勝文化。 財團法人食品工業發展研究所,2010。『台灣食品消費調查統計年鑑』。新竹市:財團法人食品工業發展研究所。 財團法人食品工業發展研究所,2015。『台灣食品消費調查統計年鑑』。新竹市:財團法人食品工業發展研究所。 張宏政,2013。「休閒農場之體驗經濟、休閒教育與行銷管理分析」,『休閒產業管理學刊』。6卷,1期,71-102。 張偉豪、鄭時宜,2012。「與結構方程模型共舞-曙光初現」,新北市:前程文化。 張富偉,2008。「台灣烏龍茶產業文化研究」。碩士論文,國立臺南大學台灣文化研究所碩士班。 陳均龍,2019。「以選擇試驗法評估望海巷潮境資源保育區之生態旅遊管理策略」,『農業經濟叢刊』。25卷,2期,37-81。 陳俊良,2013。「日本茶道及罐裝飲料茶對年輕人喝茶習慣造成之影響」,行政院農業委員會第99年度補助國外短期研究報告書(補助計畫編號:99農科-4.1.1-科-a2(4)),台北市:行政院農業委員會。 黃墩岩、詹勳華、葉榮裕、林啟三,1982。「中國茶道」,暢文出版社。 詹滿色、林欣君,2019。「衡量消費者對區域性海洋漁業永續生態標章的需求」,『應用經濟論叢』。106期,1-38。 潘美玲,2013。「北埔與峨眉茶產體制之比較」,『客家研究』。6卷,1期,69-108。 蔡憲宗、蘇登照,2013。「臺灣名茶產地證明標章推動成效」,『農業生技產業季刊』。35期,33-38。 蔡翼擎、黃凱亭、高立臻、陳乃綺、楊新瑩、謝筱敏,2020。「臺灣茶業如何建構全球行銷的競爭優勢」,『管理資訊計算』。9卷,1期,132-147。 蕭文龍,2014。「多變量分析最佳入門實用書:SPSS+LISREL」,台北市:碁峰。 賴正南、蘇雅惠,2009。「台灣休閒茶業發展之思維」,『台灣農學會報』。10卷,5期,349-363。 謝敏恆,2012。「台灣茶葉的評價與展望」。碩士論文,國立中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班。 蘇登照,2011。「台灣茶葉產銷履歷制度推動與政策管理概況」,『農業生技產業季刊』。25期,25-29。 Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., and Louviere, J., 1998. “Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 80(1): 64-75. Aoki, K., Akai, K., Ujiie, K., Shimmura, T., and Nishinoe, N., 2019. “The impact of information on taste ranking and cultivation method on rice types that protect endangered birds in Japan: Non-hypothetical choice experiment with tasting,” Food Quality and Preference. 75: 28-38. Aoki, K., Akai, K., Ujiie, K., Shinmura, T., and Nishino, N., 2014. “An actual purchasing experiment for investigating the effects of eco-information on consumers' environmental consciousness and attitudes towards agricultural products,” International Journal of Automation Technology. 8(5): 688-697. Aoki, K., Shen, J., and Saijo, T., 2010. “Consumer reaction to information on food additives: Evidence from an eating experiment and a field survey,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 73: 433-438. Bernard, J. C., and Liu, Y., 2017. “Are beliefs stronger than taste? A field experiment on organic and local apples,” Food Quality and Preference. 61: 55-62. Bhumiratana, N., Adhikari, K., and Chambers, E., 2014. “The development of an emotion lexicon for the coffee drinking experience,” Food Research International. 61: 83-92. Boxall, P. C., and Adamowicz, W. L., 2002. “Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach,” Environmental and Resource Economics. 23: 421-446. Boxall, P., Cash, S., Wismer, W. V., Muralidharan, V., and Annett, L. E., 2007. “The role of sensory experiences and information on the willingness to pay for organic wheat bread,” Research Project Number CMD-0701, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Breidert, C., Hahsler, M., and Reutterer, T., 2006. “A review of methods for measuring willingness-to-pay,” Innovative Marketing. 2(4): 8-32. Burton, M., Rigby, D., Young, T., and James, S., 2001. “Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in food in the UK,” European Review of Agricultural Economics. 28(4): 479-498. Chen, H. S., and Chen, C. H., 2019. “Economic valuation of Green Island, Taiwan: A choice experiment method,” Sustainability. 11(2): 403. Cheng, S., and Long, J. S., 2007. “Testing for IIA in the multinomial logit model,” Sociological Methods and Research. 35(4): 583-600. Chipfupa, U., and Wale, E., 2019. “Smallholder willingness to pay and preferences in the way irrigation water should be managed: A choice experiment application in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,” Water SA. 45(3): 383-392. George, D., and Mallery, P., 2003. “SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference,” Boston: Allyn Bacon. Ginon, E., Chabanet, C., Combris, P., and Issanchou, S., 2014. “Are decisions in a real choice experiment consistent with reservation prices elicited with BDM ‘auction’? The case of French baguettes,” Food Quality and Preference. 31: 173-180. Gracia, A., Loureiro, M. L., and Nayga, Jr. R. M., 2009. “Consumers’ valuation of nutritional information: A choice experiment study,” Food Quality and Preference. 20(7): 463-471. Greene, W. H., 2012. “NLOGIT reference guide,” Australia: Econometric Software. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C., 1998. “Multivariate data analysis,” Prentice-Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Hanley, N., Mourato, S., and Wright, R. E., 2001. “Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuatioin?” Journal of Economic Surveys. 15(3): 435-462. Hanley, N., Wright, R. E., and Adamowicz, V., 1998. “Using choice experiments to value the environment,” Environmental and Resource Economics. 11: (3-4): 413-428. Hartnett, C. S., Furstenberg F., Birditt K., and Fingerman K., 2013. “Parental support during young adulthood: Why does assistance decline with age?” Journal of Family Issues. 34: 975-1007. Hausman, J., and McFadden, D., 1984. “Specification tests for the multinomial logit model,” Econometrica. 52(5): 1219-1240. Hoyos, D., 2010. “The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments,” Ecological Economics. 69: 1595-1603. Jaeck, M., and Lifran, R., 2014. “Farmers’ preferences for production practices: a choice experiment study in the Rhone River Delta,” Journal of Agricultural Economics. 65(1): 112-130. Jianjun, J., Chong, J., and Lun L., 2013. “The economic valuation of cultivated land protection: A contingent valuation study in Wenling City, China,” Landscape and Urban Planning. 119: 158-164. Juutinen, A., Mitani, Y., Mäntymaa, E., Shoji, Y., Siikamäki, P., and Svento, R., 2011. “Combining ecological and recreational aspects in national park management: A choice experiment application,” Ecological Economics. 70(6): 1231-1239. Kaiser, K. J., 1974. “An index of factorial simplicity,” Psychometrika. 39(1): 31-36. Karpov, A., and Merzlov, A.,2016. “The experience economy approach to marketing Les Plus Beaux Villages brand in Russia,” Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes. 8(3): 373-379. Kim, D., and Park, B. J., 2017. “The moderating role of context in the effects of choice attributes on hotel choice: A discrete choice experiment,” Tourism Management. 63: 439-451. Lancaster, K. J., 1966. “A new approach to consumer theory,” Journal of Political Economy. 74(2): 132-157. Lee, C. H., and Wang, C. H., 2017. “Estimating residents’ preference of the land use program surrounding forest park, Taiwan,” Sustainability. 9(4): 598. Lindhjem, H., and Mitani, Y., 2012. “Forest owners’ willingness to accept compensation for voluntary conservation: A contingent valuation approach,” Journal of Forest Economics. 18(4): 290-302. Loureiro, M. L., and Umberger, W. J., 2007. “A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability,” Food Policy. 32(4): 496-514. Louviere, J. J., Flynn, T. N., and Carson, R. T., 2010. “Discrete choice experiments are not conjoint analysis,” Journal of Choice Modelling. 3(3): 57-72. Machado, P. P., Claro, R. M., Canella, D. S., Sarti, F. M., and Levy, R. B., 2017. “Price and convenience: The influence of supermarkets on consumption of ultra-processed foods and beverages in Brazil,” Appetite. 116: 381-388. Mahieu, P. A., Andersson, H., Beaumais, O., Crastes, R., and Wolff, F. C., 2014. “Is choice experiment becoming more popular than contingent valuation? A systematic review in agriculture, environment and health,” French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Paper. 2014.12. McFadden, D., 1973. “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior,” In: Frontiers of Econometrics, ed. by Zambreka., P. New York, Academic Press: 105-142. Mejía, C. V., and Brandt, S., 2015. “Managing tourism in the Galapagos Islands through price incentives: A choice experiment approach,” Ecological Economics. 117: 1-11. Naseem, A., Qaiser, I., and Ali, S., 2015. “Determinants of consumer preferences of branded goods: A case study of selected districts of Punjab Pakistan,” Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research. 14. Notaro, S., Grilli, G., and Paletto, A., 2018. “The role of emotions on tourists’ willingness to pay for the Alpine landscape: A latent class approach,” Landscape Research. 44(6): 743-756. Nunnally, J. C., 1978. “Psychometric theory,” New York: McGraw-Hill. Oh, H., Fiore, A. M., and Jeoung, M., 2007. “Measuring experience economy concepts: Tourism applications,” Journal of Travel Research. 46(2): 119-132. Ortega, D. L., Wang, H. H., and Widmar, N. J. O., 2014. “Effects of media headlines on consumer preferences for food safety, quality and environmental attributes,” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 59: 433-445. Pilgrim, T., S., Watling, R. J., and Kliti, G., 2010. “Application of trace element and stable isotope signatures to determine the provenance of tea (Camellia sinensis) samples,” Food Chemistry. 118(4): 921-926. Pine, J., and Gilmore, J. H., 1999. “Welcome to the experience economy,” Harvard Business Review. 76: 97-105. Poe, G. L., Giraud, K. L., and Loomis, J. B., 2005. “Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 87: 353-365. Rivaroli, S., Hingley, M. K., and Spadoni, R., 2018. “The motivation behind drinking craft beer in Italian brew pubs: A case study,” Economia Agro-Alimentare. 20(3): 425-443. Schoeni, R., and Ross, K., 2005. “Material assistance received from families during the transition to adulthood,” In R. Settersten, Jr., F. Furstenberg, Jr., and R. Rumbaut (Eds.). On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Shen, J., and Gao, S., 2008. “A solution to separation and multicollinearity in multiple logistic regression,” Journal of Data Science. 6(4): 515. Siegrist, M., and Cousin, M.-E., 2009. “Expectations influence sensory experience in a wine tasting,” Appetite. 52(3): 762-765. Stolarick, K., Denstedt, M., Donald, B., and Spencer, G. M., 2011. “Creativity, tourism and economic development in a rural context: The case of Prince Edward County,” Journal of Rural and Community Development. 5: 238-254. von Meyer‐Höfer, M., von der Wense, V., and Spiller, A., 2015. “Characterising convinced sustainable food consumers,” British Food Journal. 117(3): 1082-1104. Williamson, P. O., Lockshin, L., Francis, I. L., and Loose, S. M., 2016. “Influencing consumer choice: Short and medium term effect of country of origin information on wine choice,” Food Quality and Preference. 51: 89-99. Yue, C., and Tong, C., 2009. “Organic or local? Investigating consumer preference for fresh produce using a choice experiment with real economic incentives,” Hortscience. 44(2): 366-371. Zwerina, K., Huber, J., and Kuhfeld, W. F., 1996. “A general method for constructing efficient choice designs,” Durham, NC: Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15412 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 茶產業在我國已有多年的發展歷史,尤其在國人對於茶飲的需求日漸提高下,其重要性不言而喻,然而,隨著廉價進口茶葉大量進口,國產茶在價格上難以與其競爭,對我國茶產業產生巨大衝擊。但近年發生的進口茶安風暴,也提升國人對茶飲健康與品質的要求,或許對我國茶產業是個轉機,又飲用大部分以進口茶葉為原料的手搖飲主要族群為年輕人,因此本研究將探討年輕消費者的飲茶習慣與購買行為、對於國產茶的認知與偏好及對各屬性等級之願付價格。 本研究主要利用選擇實驗法進行分析,以瞭解我國年輕消費者對國產茶產品的偏好及願付價格,結果顯示消費者對國產茶產品存在異質性偏好,且對屬性的偏好程度以「產銷履歷」或「有機」認證的國產茶產品為高。此外,本研究認為消費者對於產品的「體驗」經驗,亦是影響其購買決策的重要因素,因此進行品茗活動的體驗前後差異比較,實證結果發現消費者對各屬性等級之願付價格皆有顯著改變,體驗後更偏好「綠茶」及「烏龍茶」、更重視「精品茶」及具「產銷履歷」或「有機」認證之國產茶產品。由以上結果皆可見年輕消費者對具認證產品的重視,以及「體驗」確實會深入影響消費者對茶產品的選擇行為。 根據以上之研究結果,本研究建議未來在銷售國產茶產品時,可加入體驗行銷的方式,透過體驗活動,消費者才能更準確瞭解自己真實的偏好,因此,提供試喝的服務變得相當重要,或是在消費者選購茶產品時與其分享與該茶產品相關的茶文化,有助於加深消費者對於國產茶的印象,並進而提升消費者對於國產茶的消費意願。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The tea industry has a historical of development in Taiwan for many years, its importance is self-evident, especially with the increasing demand for tea. However, with large amount of cheap imported tea, it is difficult for Taiwan tea to compete in terms of price. It has a huge impact on Taiwan's tea industry. However, the storm of imported tea safety in recent years has also raised the requirements of Taiwanese on the health and quality of tea. Perhaps it is a turning point for Taiwan’s tea industry, and the main ethnic groups who drink most of the hand-shake beverages that use imported tea as raw materials are young people. Therefore, the study will explore young consumers’ drinking habits and purchasing behavior of tea, their perceptions and preferences for Taiwan tea, and their willingness-to-pay for each attribute and level. A choice experiment is analyzed with a multinomial logit model, a random parameter model, and a latent class model, respectively. The results show that Taiwanese consumers have heterogeneous preferences for Taiwan tea products, and consumers place the high value on the attribute of traceable and Organic. In addition, this study believes that the consumer's 'experience' with the product is also an important factor that affects their purchasing decision, therefore, the tea tasting activitiy was conducted. The empirical results found that all of attributes’ willingness-to-pay have significant changes. After the activity, consumers preferred green tea and oolong tea, and pay more attention to specialty tea and Taiwan tea products with traceability or organic certification. From the above results, it can be seen that the importance of young consumers on certified products, and the 'experience' will indeed deeply affect consumers' choice of tea products. Based on the above research results, this study suggests that in the future, you can join experiential marketing when selling Taiwan tea products. Through experience activities, consumers can more accurately understand their true preferences. Therefore, it is very important to provide a taste service or share the culture related to the tea products with consumers when they buy them, which will help to deepen consumers' impressions of Taiwan tea and further increase consumers' purchasing intention of Taiwan tea. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:40:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2607202023553900.pdf: 2309994 bytes, checksum: adbee00ffe8e46af261c11495b6cce23 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i 謝辭 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 表目錄 viii 圖目錄 x 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究步驟與流程 3 第三節 研究架構 4 第二章 台灣茶產業背景與概況 5 第一節 茶產業簡介及製茶加工過程 5 第二節 台灣茶葉生產與進出口概況 8 第三節 台灣茶葉消費概況 22 第四節 小結 29 第三章 文獻回顧 30 第一節 國內茶葉消費之相關文獻 30 第二節 影響消費決策與體驗經濟之相關文獻 32 第三節 選擇實驗之相關文獻 35 第四節 小結 39 第四章 研究方法 40 第一節 選擇實驗法 40 第二節 國產茶產品的屬性選擇 46 第三節 問卷設計 49 第四節 受訪者招募與體驗活動設計 51 第五節 資料分析方法 56 第六節 小結 58 第五章 敘述統計與交叉分析 59 第一節 敘述統計分析 59 第二節 交叉分析 79 第三節 小結 97 第六章 實證結果 98 第一節 因素分析及集群分析 98 第二節 選擇實驗偏好分析 104 第三節 體驗前後之差異分析 114 第七章 結論與建議 120 第一節 結論 120 第二節 建議 121 參考文獻 124 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 體驗經濟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國產茶 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 選擇實驗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 年輕人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 消費者偏好 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 願付價格 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | willingness-to-pay | en |
| dc.subject | experience economy | en |
| dc.subject | Taiwan tea | en |
| dc.subject | choice experiment | en |
| dc.subject | young generation | en |
| dc.subject | consumers’ preferences | en |
| dc.title | 年輕人對國產茶的消費行為之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Research on Taiwan Tea Consumption Behavior for the Young Generation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 詹滿色(Man-Ser Jan),陳雅惠(Ya-Hui Chen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 國產茶,選擇實驗,年輕人,消費者偏好,願付價格,體驗經濟, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Taiwan tea,choice experiment,young generation,consumers’ preferences,willingness-to-pay,experience economy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 130 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001879 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-07-27 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 農業經濟學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2607202023553900.pdf Restricted Access | 2.26 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
