Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 進修推廣部
  3. 事業經營碩士在職學位學程
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15403
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃恆獎
dc.contributor.authorYu-Chieh Linen
dc.contributor.author林玉婕zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T17:33:48Z-
dc.date.copyright2020-07-15
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-06-09
dc.identifier.citation1. 中文文獻
[1] 李吉仁(1996)。國際分工廠商策略選擇/ODM的策略架構。第五屆產業管理研討會-台灣產業之創新與國際化。
[2] 李懷禎(2017)。儲存設備系統與半導體電子設計自動化工具軟體整合組態之研究-以R公司為例。國立中央大學資訊管理學系在職專班碩士論文,未出版,桃園市。
[3] 張文德(2001)。協力廠商參與產品創新之類型探討–台灣工具機業的實證研究。私立東海大學工業工程與經營資訊研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
[4] 張立奇(2011)。EDA產業之成長模式分析。國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班科技管理組碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
[5] 陳永隆 (2007)。協同創新的發展趨勢。中技通訊社雜誌,8月。
[6] 陳振祥(1996)。ODM策略之理論架構與實證。國立台灣大學商學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
[7] 鄭春木(1997)。資訊分享、協同合作對經營所產生的效益影響之探討–以零售業為例。國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
2. 英文文獻
[1] Achtenhagen, L., Melin, L., & Naldi, L. (2013). Dynamics of Business Models-Strategizing, Critical Capabilities and Activities for Sustained Value Creation. Long Range Planning, 46(6), 427-442.
[2] Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2003). Internet Business Models and Strategies: Text and Case ( 1st ed,). New York: McGraw-Hill, Irwin.
[3] Bellman, R., Clark, C. E., Malcolm, D. G., Craft, C. J., & Ricciardi, F. M. (1957). On the construction of a multi-stage, multi-person business game. Operations Research, 5(4), 469-503.
[4] Brown, R. (1992). Managing the S curve of innovation. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 7(3), 41-52.
[5] Chesbrough, H. W. (2007a). Business model innovation: It’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy and Leadership, 35, 12-17.
[6] Drucker, P. (1994). The theory of the business. In: Cambridge.
[7] Drucker, P. F. (1985). The Discipline of Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 67-72.
[8] Eisenhardt, K., & Tabrizi, B. (1995). Accelerating Adaptive Process: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 84-110.
[9] Finley, F., & Srikanth. S. (2005). Imperative for successful collaboration. Supple Chain Management Review, 9(1), 30-38.
[10] Gupta, A. K., & Souder, W. E. (1998). Key Drivers of Reduced Cycle Time. Research Technology Management, 41(4), 38-44.
[11] Johnson, M. W. (2010). Seizing the white space: Business model innovation for growth and renewal: Harvard Business Press.
[12] Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 57-68.
[13] Kessler, E. H. (2000). Tightening the belt: methods for reducing development costs associated with new product innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, 59-92.
[14] Kirk, J., and Miller, M. (1988). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research, London: Sage.
[15] Lakhani, K. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H. & Tushman, M. (2012). Open Innovation and Organizational Boundaries: The Impact of Task Decomposition and Knowledge Distribution on the Locus of Innovation. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.
[16] Mead, C., & Conway, L. (1980). Introduction to VLSI Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
[17] Michael Rappa (2000). Managing the Digital Enterprise: Business Models on the web, http://digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html, North Carolina State University.
[18] Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
[19] Robbins, S. (2001). Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River. (9th ed.) New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[20] Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[21] Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[22] Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B., & Daugherty, P. J. (2001). Supply chain collaboration and logistical service performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(1), 29-48.
[23] Tushman, M., & Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing of innovation. California Management Review, 28(3), Spring.
[24] Walters, D., & Rainbird, M. (2007). Cooperative Innovation: a value chain approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20(5), 595-607.
[25] Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Designing Your Future Business Model: An Activity System Perspective. Long Range Planning, 43, 216-226.
3. 相關網站
[1] 新思科技。瀏覽日期:2019/10/25。取自:https://www.synopsys.com/zh-tw.html
[2] 益華電腦。瀏覽日期:2019/10/25。取自:https://www.cadence.com/zh_TW/home.html
[3] 明導國際。瀏覽日期:2019/10/25。取自:https://www.mentor.com/
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15403-
dc.description.abstract隨著現今積體電路功能越趨繁複,在講求成本與效率的前提下,IC設計已無法透過紙筆及人工來進行設計,仰賴電腦所提供高速計算及資料處理的特性已是必然,電子設計自動化就在這樣的趨勢下應運而生。從半導體產業的體系來看,EDA為半導體設計、製造的上游,透過電腦軟體工具將複雜的產品設計過程自動化,縮短開發時間,藉由EDA的輔助,大大縮短IC設計開發的時間,提升半導體產業製程技術。電子電路產品功能日新月異,積體電路在設計上所可能遭遇的問題越發複雜,包含開發過程中的系統電路規劃與模擬、軟硬體共同開發,一直到設計驗證與除錯等等,皆需要企業內部開發人員間緊密的相互合作與配合。
本研究的目的在於探討EDA產業建立電子產品設計開發平台之可行性,以降低開發過程可能面臨的潛在風險。本研究透過C公司的訪談,得到的結論如下:電子產品設計開發平台可以模擬真正生產的過程,並且避免投產後發生的設計變更而產生損失,精確迅捷且可以虛擬化的設計過程。電子設計開發平台可以是一個方便的工具,可幫助和工程師進行知識的交流,知識的復用,呈現問題,呈現項目進度,節省溝通的成本。電子設計開發平台中事先討論過設計交互的場景,資料交換與轉換就省下許多的麻煩,並且確認與上下游的協同更順暢。電子設計開發平台將知識和資料管理模塊化,讓新的產品項目可以其為基礎加上新的需求,新的創新,而不必從零開始,從犯當初犯過的錯誤,節省許多開發時間,減少錯誤。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWith the increasing complexity of integrated circuit functions today, IC design can no longer be designed with paper, pen and manual on the premise of cost and efficiency. It is inevitable to rely on the characteristics of high-speed computing and data processing provided by computers. Under this trend, from the perspective of the semiconductor industry system, EDA is the upstream of semiconductor design and manufacturing. It uses computer software tools to automate complex product design processes and shorten development time. With the assistance of EDA, IC design and development time is greatly shortened and the semiconductor industry is improved. The functions of electronic circuit products are changing with each passing day, and the problems encountered in the design of integrated circuits are becoming more and more complicated, including system circuit planning and simulation during the development process, joint development of hardware and software, and design verification and debugging. The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of the EDA industry to establish an electronic product design and development platform to reduce the potential risks that the development process may face. In this study, through the interview of company C, the conclusions obtained are as follows: The electronic product design and development platform can simulate the real production process and avoid the loss of design changes that occur after commissioning. The design process is accurate, fast and can be virtualized. The electronic design and development platform can be a convenient tool to help exchange knowledge with engineers, reuse knowledge, present problems, present project progress, and save communication costs. The electronic design development platform has discussed the design interaction scenarios in advance, and the data exchange and conversion save a lot of trouble and confirm that the collaboration with the upstream and downstream is smoother. The electronic design and development platform modularize knowledge and data management, so that new product projects can be based on it and add new requirements and new innovations without having to start from scratch, making mistakes that were made at the beginning, saving many development time and reducing error.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:33:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-109-P07e41007-1.pdf: 1173211 bytes, checksum: 2d21209a9753931318c521d57ddcbcd2 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2020
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的與研究問題 2
1.3 研究範圍與研究流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1 商業模式 4
2.2 協同創新 7
2.3 電子設計自動化 10
第三章 研究方法 17
3.1 研究方法 17
3.2 研究對象 20
3.3 研究工具 21
3.4 實施過程 22
第四章 個案公司分析 23
4.1 個案公司介紹 23
4.2 訪談資料分析 27
第五章 結論與討論 42
5.1 主要發現 42
5.2 實務意涵 44
5.3 研究限制 45
5.4 未來研究方向 46
參考文獻 47

圖目錄
圖1 1研究流程圖 3
圖2 1商業模式圖 6
圖4 1 PCB設計流程圖 25
圖4 2電子商務平台設計圖 39
表目錄
表2 1企業創新需具備之核心能力 10
表2 2企業創新需具備之核心能力 14
表2 3 EDA市場主要廠商 15
表3 1訪談人員名單 19
表3 2受訪方式與職位 20
表3 3受訪者資料 20
表3 4訪談大綱 21
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.titleEDA廠商採用電子產品設計開發平台之研究-以C公司為例zh_TW
dc.titleAdoption of Intelligent System Design Platform by Electronic Design Automation (EDA) Firms: The Case of C Companyen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear108-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee王仕茹,張嘉雯
dc.subject.keyword半導體,IC設計,電子設計平台,個案研究,訪談法,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordsemiconductor,IC design,electronic design platform,case study,interview method,en
dc.relation.page49
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202000964
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2020-06-10
dc.contributor.author-college進修推廣學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept事業經營碩士在職學位學程zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:事業經營碩士在職學位學程

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-109-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
1.15 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved