請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15304
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 賴鴻緒(Hong-Shiee Lai) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen-Hsiang Kuan | en |
dc.contributor.author | 官振翔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T17:32:41Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-07-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Albores-Saavedra J, Schwartz AM, Henson DE, Kostun L, Hart A, Angeles-Albores D, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma. Analysis of 434 cases from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program, 1973-2007. Annals of Diagnostic Pathology 2011;15(2):93-7. Anderson RR, Donelan MB, Hivnor C, Greeson E, Ross EV, Shumaker PR, et al. Laser treatment of traumatic scars with an emphasis on ablative fractional laser resurfacing: consensus report. JAMA Dermatology 2014;150(2):187-93. Bakamjian V. A two-stage method for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with a primary pectoral skin flap. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1965;36(2):173-84. Barnes L, Eveson J, Reichart P, Sidransky D. World Health Organization classifications tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer 2005. Barreiro O, Cibrian D, Clemente C, Alvarez D, Moreno V, Valiente Í, et al. Pivotal role for skin transendothelial radio-resistant anti-inflammatory macrophages in tissue repair. eLife 2016;5:e15251. Bedi VP, Chan KF, Sink RK, Hantash BM, Herron GS, Rahman Z, et al. The effects of pulse energy variations on the dimensions of microscopic thermal treatment zones in nonablative fractional resurfacing. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 2007;39(2):145-55. Bernstein JM, Irish JC, Brown DH, Goldstein D, Chung P, Razak ARA, et al. Survival outcomes for cutaneous angiosarcoma of the scalp versus face. Head Neck 2017;39(6):1205-11. Boyce ST, Lalley AL. Tissue engineering of skin and regenerative medicine for wound care. Burns Trauma 2018;6(1):4. Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu Q-Y, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2007;119(7):2092-100. Bullard KM, Longaker MT, Lorenz HP. Fetal wound healing: current biology. World Journal of Surgery 2003;27(1):54-61. Campagnola PJ, Loew LM. Second-harmonic imaging microscopy for visualizing biomolecular arrays in cells, tissues and organisms. Nature Biotechnology 2003;21(11):1356-60. Cash JL, Martin P. Myeloid Cells in Cutaneous Wound Repair. Microbiology Spectrum 2016;4(3). Celli S, Albert ML, Bousso P. Visualizing the innate and adaptive immune responses underlying allograft rejection by two-photon microscopy. Nature Medicine 2011;17(6):744-9. Cepeda MS, Boston R, Farrar JT, Strom BL. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. American Journal of Epidemiology 2003;158(3):280-7. Chen H-c, Tang Y-b. Anterolateral thigh flap: an ideal soft tissue flap. Clinics in Plastic Surgery 2003;30(3):383-401. Chen J-P, Chang J-Y, Hong R-L. P2-175 Polo-like kinase inhibitor with radiation in betel-nuts related HNSCC in Taiwan. Annals of Oncology 2019;30(Supplement_6):vi134. Chen W-L, Li T-H, Su P-J, Chou C-K, Fwu PT, Lin S-J, et al. Second harmonic generation χ tensor microscopy for tissue imaging. Applied Physics Letters 2009;94(18):183902. Chen X, Leischner U, Rochefort NL, Nelken I, Konnerth A. Functional mapping of single spines in cortical neurons in vivo. Nature 2011;475(7357):501-5. Chen Y-T, Chang Y-T, Pan S-Y, Chou Y-H, Chang F-C, Yeh P-Y, et al. Lineage tracing reveals distinctive fates for mesothelial cells and submesothelial fibroblasts during peritoneal injury. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2014;25(12):2847-58. Chiang EY, Hidalgo A, Chang J, Frenette PS. Imaging receptor microdomains on leukocyte subsets in live mice. Nature Methods 2007;4(3):219-22. Chiu Y-H, Chang D-H, Perng C-K. Vascular complications and free flap salvage in head and neck reconstructive surgery: analysis of 150 cases of reexploration. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2017;78(3):S83-S88. Clark R. The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair: Springer Science Business Media, 2013. Clark RA, Lanigan JM, DellaPelle P, Manseau E, Dvorak HF, Colvin RB. Fibronectin and fibrin provide a provisional matrix for epidermal cell migration during wound reepithelialization. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1982;79(5):264-9. Clementoni MT, Pedrelli V, Zaccaria G, Pontini P, Motta LR, Azzopardi EA. New Developments for Fractional Co2 Resurfacing for Skin Rejuvenation and Scar Reduction. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics 2020;28(1):17-28. Cutroneo KR. TGF‐β–induced fibrosis and SMAD signaling: oligo decoys as natural therapeutics for inhibition of tissue fibrosis and scarring. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2007;15(s1):S54-S60. Davidson BJ, Newkirk KA, Harter KW, Picken CA, Cullen KJ, Sessions RB. Complications from planned, posttreatment neck dissections. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head Neck Surgery 1999;125(4):401-5. de Bree R, van der Valk P, Kuik DJ, van Diest PJ, Doornaert P, Buter J, et al. Prognostic factors in adult soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck: a single-centre experience. Oral Oncology 2006;42(7):703-9. De Wilde R, Boeckx W, Van Der Schueren E, Guelinckx P, Gruwez J. A scanning electron microscopic study of microvascular anastomoses on irradiated vessels: Short‐term effect of irradiation. Microsurgery 1983;4(3):193-200. Delavary BM, van der Veer WM, van Egmond M, Niessen FB, Beelen RH. Macrophages in skin injury and repair. Immunobiology 2011;216(7):753-62. Dettenborn T, Wermker K, Schulze H-J, Klein M, Schwipper V, Hallermann C. Prognostic features in angiosarcoma of the head and neck: a retrospective monocenter study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 2014;42(8):1623-8. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013;29(1):15-21. Dort JC, Farwell DG, Findlay M, Huber GF, Kerr P, Shea-Budgell MA, et al. Optimal perioperative care in major head and neck cancer surgery with free flap reconstruction: a consensus review and recommendations from the enhanced recovery after surgery society. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head Neck Surgery 2017;143(3):292-303. Durbec M, Couloigner V, Tronche S, Albert S, Kanitakis J, Boudrigua AL, et al. Guidelines of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL), short version. Extension assessment and principles of resection in cutaneous head and neck tumors. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases 2014;131(6):375-83. Falcone R, Nappi J. Chemotherapy and wound healing. Surgical Clinics of North America 1984;64(4):779-94. Farrar MJ, Bernstein IM, Schlafer DH, Cleland TA, Fetcho JR, Schaffer CB. Chronic in vivo imaging in the mouse spinal cord using an implanted chamber. Nature Methods 2012;9(3):297-302. Figueiredo MT, Marques LA, Campos‐Filho N. Soft‐tissue sarcomas of the head and neck in adults and children: Experience at a single institution with a review of literature. International Journal of Cancer 1988;41(2):198-200. Finney R, Torbeck R, Saedi N. Non-ablative fractional resurfacing in the treatment of scar contracture. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 2016;48(2):170-3. Forastiere AA, Baker S, Wheeler R, Medvec B. Intra-arterial cisplatin and FUDR in advanced malignancies confined to the head and neck. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1987;5(10):1601-6. Friedrich EE, Niknam‐Bienia S, Xie P, Jia SX, Hong SJ, Mustoe TA, et al. Thermal injury model in the rabbit ear with quantifiable burn progression and hypertrophic scar. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2017;25(2):327-37. Fuwa N, Kodaira T, Furutani K, Tachibana H, Nakamura T. Treatment results of continuous intra-arterial CBDCA infusion chemotherapy in combination with radiation therapy for locally advanced tongue cancer. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 2008;105(6):714-9. George Broughton I, Janis JE, Attinger CE. The basic science of wound healing. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2006;117(7S):12S-34S. Geronemus RG. Fractional photothermolysis: current and future applications. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 2006a;38(3):169-76. Girard C, Johnson WC, Graham JH. Cutaneous angiosarcoma. Cancer 1970;26(4):868-83. Gokhale AS, Lavertu P. Surgical salvage after chemoradiation of head and neck cancer: complications and outcomes. Current Oncology Reports 2001;3(1):72-6. Guadagnolo BA, Zagars GK, Araujo D, Ravi V, Shellenberger TD, Sturgis EM. Outcomes after definitive treatment for cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face and scalp. Head Neck 2011;33(5):661-7. Gurushanthaiah D, Knoblock R, Haller JR. Intra‐arterial Effects of Cisplatin on Microvascular Anastomoses in the Rat Model. The Laryngoscope 2002;112(8):1456-8. Haughey BH, Wilson E, Kluwe L, Piccirillo J, Fredrickson J, Sessions D, et al. Free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: analysis of 241 cases. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery 2001;125(1):10-7. Haustein UF. Anglosarcoma of the Face and Scalp. International Journal of Dermatology 1991;30(12):851-6. Heffelfinger RN, Sanan A, Bryant LM. Management of forehead scars. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America 2017;25(1):15-24. Hodgkinson DJ, Soule EH, Woods JE. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and neck. Cancer 1979;44(3):1106-13. Holden CA, Spittle MF, Jones EW. Angiosarcoma of the face and scalp, prognosis and treatment. Cancer 1987;59(5):1046-57. Homma A, Onimaru R, Matsuura K, Robbins KT, Fujii M. Intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2015;46(1):4-12. Homma A, Oridate N, Suzuki F, Taki S, Asano T, Yoshida D, et al. Superselective high‐dose cisplatin infusion with concomitant radiotherapy in patients with advanced cancer of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: a single institution experience. Cancer 2009;115(20):4705-14. Hwang K. The Origins of Deltopectoral Flaps and the Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap. J Craniofacial Surgery 2016;27(7):1845-8. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1996;5(3):299-314. Issler-Fisher AC, Waibel JS, Donelan MB. Laser modulation of hypertrophic scars: technique and practice. Clinics in Plastic Surgery 2017;44(4):757-66. Shaw TJ, Kishi K, Mori R. Wound-associated skin fibrosis: mechanisms and treatments based on modulating the inflammatory response. Endocrine, Metabolic Immune Disorders-Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-Immune, Endocrine Metabolic Disorders) 2010;10(4):320-30. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 2011;61(2):69-90. Kienast Y, von Baumgarten L, Fuhrmann M, Klinkert WE, Goldbrunner R, Herms J, et al. Real-time imaging reveals the single steps of brain metastasis formation. Nature Medicine 2010;16(1):116-22. Kloeters O, Tandara A, Mustoe TA. Hypertrophic scar model in the rabbit ear: a reproducible model for studying scar tissue behavior with new observations on silicone gel sheeting for scar reduction. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2007;15:S40-S45. Klopp CT, Alford TC, Bateman J, Berry GN, Winship T. Fractionated intra-arterial cancer: chemotherapy with methyl bis amine hydrochloride; a preliminary report. Annals of Surgery 1950;132(4):811-32. Kohyama K, Hyodo I, Hasegawa Y, Fuwa N, Kato H. Selection of recipient vessels for free flap following intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive Aesthetic Surgery 2017;70(1):25-30. Köhler HF, Neves RI, Brechtbühl ER, Granja NVM, Ikeda MK, Kowalski LP. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and neck: report of 23 cases from a single institution. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2008;139(4):519-24. Lai H-L, Tang Y, Chien C-Y, Fang F-M, Huang T-L, Chiu T-J, et al. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio is an independent prognosticator in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma receiving induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil. Journal of Cancer Research and Practice 2019;6(4):170-178. Laubach HJ, Tannous Z, Anderson RR, Manstein D. Skin responses to fractional photothermolysis. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery 2006;38(2):142-9. Levine E, Degutis L, Pruzinsky T, Shin J, Persing JA. Quality of life and facial trauma: psychological and body image effects. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2005;54(5):502-10. Li JL, Goh CC, Keeble JL, Qin JS, Roediger B, Jain R, et al. Intravital multiphoton imaging of immune responses in the mouse ear skin. Nature Protocols 2012;7(2):221-34. Li MM, Puram SV, Silverman DA, Old MO, Rocco JW, Kang SY. Margin Analysis in Head and Neck Cancer: State of the Art and Future Directions. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2019;26(12):4070-80. Licitra L, Zigon G, Gatta G, Sánchez M-J, Berrino F, Group EW. Human papillomavirus in HNSCC: a European epidemiologic perspective. Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America 2008;22(6):1143-53. Lighthall JG, Fedok FG. Treating scars of the chin and perioral region. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics 2017;25(1):55-71. Longaker MT, Whitby DJ, Ferguson M, Lorenz HP, Harrison MR, Adzick NS. Adult skin wounds in the fetal environment heal with scar formation. Annals of Surgery 1994;219(1):65-72. Lorenz HP, Longaker MT, Perkocha LA, Jennings RW, Harrison MR, Adzick NS. Scarless wound repair: a human fetal skin model. Development 1992;114(1):253-9. Lydiatt WM, Shaha AR, Shah JP. Angiosarcoma of the head and neck. The American Journal of Surgery 1994;168(5):451-4. Mackool RJ, Gittes GK, Longaker MT. Scarless healing. The fetal wound. Clinics in Plastic Surgery 1998;25(3):357-65. Maden M. Optimal skin regeneration after full thickness thermal burn injury in the spiny mouse, Acomys cahirinus. Burns 2018;44(6):1509-20. Manstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK, Tanner H, Anderson RR. Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 2004;34(5):426-38. Mark RJ, Tran LM, Sercarz J, Fu YS, Calcaterra TC, Juillard GF. Angiosarcoma of the head and neck: the UCLA experience 1955 through 1990. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head Neck Surgery 1993;119(9):973-8. Marqa MF, Mordon S. Laser fractional photothermolysis of the skin: numerical simulation of microthermal zones. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy 2014;16(2):57-65. Marsh E, Gonzalez DG, Lathrop EA, Boucher J, Greco V. Positional stability and membrane occupancy define skin fibroblast homeostasis in vivo. Cell 2018;175(6):1620-33. Martin P. Wound healing--aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science 1997;276(5309):75-81. Martin P, D'Souza D, Martin J, Grose R, Cooper L, Maki R, et al. Wound healing in the PU. 1 null mouse—tissue repair is not dependent on inflammatory cells. Current Biology 2003;13(13):1122-8. Martin P, Lewis J. Actin cables and epidermal movement in embryonic wound healing. Nature 1992;360(6400):179-83. Martin P, Nunan R. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of repair in acute and chronic wound healing. British Journal of Dermatology 2015;173(2):370-8. McCluskey J, Martin P. Analysis of the tissue movements of embryonic wound healing—DiI studies in the limb bud stage mouse embryo. Developmental Biology 1995;170(1):102-14. McKercher SR, Torbett BE, Anderson KL, Henkel GW, Vestal DJ, Baribault H, et al. Targeted disruption of the PU. 1 gene results in multiple hematopoietic abnormalities. The EMBO Journal 1996;15(20):5647-5658. Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom L-G. Angiosarcoma of soft tissue: a study of 80 cases. The American journal of surgical pathology 1998;22(6):683-97. Mendenhall WM, Mendenhall CM, Werning JW, Reith JD, Mendenhall NP. Cutaneous angiosarcoma. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 2006;29(5):524-8. Morales PH, Lindberg RD, Barkley HT. Soft tissue angiosarcomas. International Journal of Radiation Oncology 1981;7(12):1655-9. Morgan JE, Breau RL, Suen JY, Hanna EY. Surgical wound complications after intensive chemoradiotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head Neck Surgery 2007;133(1):10-4. Morgan MB, Swann M, Somach S, Eng W, Smoller B. Cutaneous angiosarcoma: a case series with prognostic correlation. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2004;50(6):867-74. Mori R, Shaw TJ, Martin P. Molecular mechanisms linking wound inflammation and fibrosis: knockdown of osteopontin leads to rapid repair and reduced scarring. The Journal of Experimental Medicine 2008;205(1):43-51. Nahabedian MY, Singh N, Deune EG, Silverman R, Tufaro AP. Recipient vessel analysis for microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2004;52(2):148-55. Ogawa K, Takahashi K, Asato Y, Yamamoto Y, Taira K, Matori S, et al. Treatment and prognosis of angiosarcoma of the scalp and face: a retrospective analysis of 48 patients. The British Journal of Radiology 2012;85(1019):e1127-e1133. Ogawa R, Akaishi S, Kuribayashi S, Miyashita T. Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars Can Now Be Cured Completely: Recent Progress in Our Understanding of the Pathogenesis of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars and the Most Promising Current Therapeutic Strategy. Journal of Nippon Medical School 2016;83(2):46-53. Olivier N, Luengo-Oroz MA, Duloquin L, Faure E, Savy T, Veilleux I, et al. Cell lineage reconstruction of early zebrafish embryos using label-free nonlinear microscopy. Science 2010;329(5994):967-71. Onur Erol O, Agaoglu G, Jawad MA. Combined non-ablative laser and microfat grafting for burn scar treatment. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2019;39(4):NP55-NP67. Paderno A, Piazza C, Bresciani L, Vella R, Nicolai P. Microvascular head and neck reconstruction after (chemo) radiation: facts and prejudices. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2016;24(2):83-90. Parekh A, Hebda PA. The contractile phenotype of dermal fetal fibroblasts in Scarless wound healing. Current Pathobiology Reports 2017;5(3):271-7. Parsons LS. Performing a 1: N case-control match on propensity score. Proceedings of the 29th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference: SAS Institute; 2004. p. 165-29. Patel SH, Hayden RE, Hinni ML, Wong WW, Foote RL, Milani S, et al. Angiosarcoma of the scalp and face: the Mayo Clinic experience. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head Neck Surgery 2015;141(4):335-40. Pawlik TM, Paulino AF, Mcginn CJ, Baker LH, Cohen DS, Morris JS, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the scalp. Cancer 2003;98(8):1716-26. Perentes JY, McKee TD, Ley CD, Mathiew H, Dawson M, Padera TP, et al. In vivo imaging of extracellular matrix remodeling by tumor-associated fibroblasts. Nature Methods 2009;6(2):143-5. Perri F, Longo F, Caponigro F, Sandomenico F, Guida A, Della Vittoria Scarpati G, et al. Management of HPV-Related Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Pitfalls and Caveat. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(4):975. Polak JF, Pencina MJ, Pencina KM, O'Donnell CJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino Sr RB. Carotid-wall intima–media thickness and cardiovascular events. New England Journal of Medicine 2011;365(3):213-21. Proctor E, Robbins KT, Vieira F, Hanchett C, Sommes G. Postoperative complications after chemoradiation for advanced head and neck cancer. Head Neck: Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck 2004;26(3):272-7. Regine WF, Valentino J, John W, Storey G, Sloan D, Kenady D, et al. High‐dose intra‐arterial cisplatin and concurrent hyperfractionated radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Report of a phase II study. Head Neck 2000;22(6):543-9. Robbins KT, Kumar P, Wong FS, Hartsell WF, Flick P, Palmer R, et al. Targeted chemoradiation for advanced head and neck cancer: analysis of 213 patients. Head Neck 2000;22(7):687-93. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician 1985;39(1):33-8. Sadrian R, Niederbichler AD, Friedman J, Vogt PM, Steinau HU, Reece G, et al. Intraarterial chemotherapy: the effects on free-tissue transfer. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2002;109(4):1254-8. Sarrazy V, Billet F, Micallef L, Coulomb B, Desmoulière A. Mechanisms of pathological scarring: role of myofibroblasts and current developments. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2011;19(s1):s10-s15. Sasaki R, Soejima T, Kishi K, Imajo Y, Hirota S, Kamikonya N, et al. Angiosarcoma treated with radiotherapy: impact of tumor type and size on outcome. International Journal of Radiation Oncology 2002;52(4):1032-40. Sassler AM, Esclamado RM, Wolf GT. Surgery after organ preservation therapy: analysis of wound complications. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head Neck Surgery 1995;121(2):162-5. Shah JP, Haribhakti V, Loree TR, Sutaria P. Complications of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction. The American Journal of Surgery 1990;160(4):352-5. Shi H-X, Lin C, Lin B-B, Wang Z-G, Zhang H-Y, Wu F-Z, et al. The anti-scar effects of basic fibroblast growth factor on the wound repair in vitro and in vivo. PloS One 2013;8(4). Sloan P, Robinson M. Quality Assessment Across Disciplines in Head and Neck Cancer Treatment Diagnostic Pathology in HNSCC. Frontiers in Oncology 2020;10:364. Son D, Harijan A. Overview of surgical scar prevention and management. Journal of Korean Medical Science 2014;29(6):751-7. Stiernberg CM, Williams RM, Hokanson JA. Influence of cisplatin on wound healing—an experimental model. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery 1986;95(2):210-2. Stoeckle E, Gardet H, Coindre J-M, Kantor G, Bonichon F, Milbéo Y, et al. Prospective evaluation of quality of surgery in soft tissue sarcoma. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO) 2006;32(10):1242-8. Sullivan BM, Liang HE, Bando JK, Wu D, Cheng LE, McKerrow JK, et al. Genetic analysis of basophil function in vivo. Nature Immunology 2011;12(6):527-35. Swonger JM, Liu JS, Ivey MJ, Tallquist MD. Genetic tools for identifying and manipulating fibroblasts in the mouse. Differentiation 2016;92(3):66-83. Taga I, Yamamoto K, Kawai H, Kawabata H, Masada K, Tsuyuguchi Y. The effects of intra-arterially injected adriamycin on microvascular anastomosis. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery 1987;3(02):153-8. Tan NC, Lin PY, Chiang YC, Chew KY, Chen CC, Fujiwara T, et al. Influence of neck dissection and preoperative irradiation on microvascular head and neck reconstruction—analysis of 853 cases. Microsurgery 2014;34(8):602-7. Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, Chaponnier C, Brown RA. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2002;3(5):349-63. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nature Protocols 2012;7(3):562-78. Tsai TH, Jee SH, Dong CY, Lin SJ. Multiphoton microscopy in dermatological imaging. Journal of Dermatological Science 2009;56(1):1-8. Valentino J, Helton WB, Unnikrishnan R, Kudrimoti M, Arnold SM, Gal T. Microvascular reconstruction after intra-arterial chemotherapy with concomitant radiation. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery 2013;149(4):541-6. Van Damme J-P, Schmitz S, Machiels J-P, Galant C, Grégoire V, Lengelé B, et al. Prognostic factors and assessment of staging systems for head and neck soft tissue sarcomas in adults. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2010;36(7):684-90. Walmsley GG, Hu MS, Hong WX, Maan ZN, Lorenz HP, Longaker MT. A mouse fetal skin model of scarless wound repair. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments) 2015(95):e52297-e. Wang Z-H, Zhang S-Z, Zhang Z-Y, Zhang C-P, Hu H-S, Kirwan J, et al. The influence of intraarterial high-dose cisplatin with concomitant irradiation on arterial microanastomosis: an experimental study. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009;32(2):158-62. Ward JR, Feigenberg SJ, Mendenhall NP, Marcus RB, Mendenhall WM. Radiation therapy for angiosarcoma. Head Neck 2003;25(10):873-8. Welshhans JL, Hom DB. Soft Tissue Principles to Minimize Scarring: An Overview. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America 2017;25(1):1-13. Werner S, Grose R. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiological Reviews 2003;83(3):835-70. Wu SY, Yom SS. Current Standards for Organ Preservation in Locoregionally Advanced Non-nasopharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer and Evolving Strategies for Favorable-Risk and Platinum-Ineligible Populations. Current Treatment Options in Oncology 2019;20(12):89. Wu Y-F, Tan H-Y, Lin S-J. Long-Term Intravital Imaging of the Cornea, Skin, and Hair Follicle by Multiphoton Microscope. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2019. Wu YF, Wang SH, Wu PS, Fan SMY, Chiu HY, Tsai TH, et al. Enhancing hair follicle regeneration by nonablative fractional laser: Assessment of irradiation parameters and tissue response. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 2015;47(4):331-41. Yagmur C, Guneren E, Kefeli M, Ogawa R. The effect of surgical denervation on prevention of excessive dermal scarring: a study on rabbit ear hypertrophic scar model. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive Aesthetic Surgery 2011;64(10):1359-65. Young RJ, Brown NJ, Reed MW, Hughes D, Woll PJ. Angiosarcoma. The Lancet Oncology 2010;11(10):983-91. Zipfel WR, Williams RM, Webb WW. Nonlinear magic: multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nature Biotechnology 2003;21(11):1369-77. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15304 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著顯微手術技巧的精進與器械設備的進步,頭頸部顯微重建在過去的二十年間大大地改善臨床醫師對頭頸部複雜缺陷病患的照顧能力。顯微組織游離皮瓣有不同供體皮瓣的多樣性選擇,讓整形顯微外科醫師可以處理各種不同種類的頭頸部缺陷及傷口,更進一步對於頭頸癌病患重建外觀及功能。近年來隨著放射模組與化學治療(簡稱 化療)的快速進步,我們對於治療頭頸部癌症病患的目標也從單純延長生存曲線進階到改善生活質量,目前有許多在研究傷口癒合及疤痕形成機轉的課題,來改善臨床病人的外觀及功能。因此,探討頭頸部顯微重建的傷口癒合過程及疤痕形成機制,會是增進臨床病患照顧的重要關鍵。為此,本研究主軸分為三個部分: ㄧ,探討化學治療對頭頸部顯微重建的影響:儘管目前頭頸癌處置中的化療能明顯改善病患的存活率,然而它們對顯微重建傷口癒合的潛在有害作用尚未被明確探討。由於細胞毒性作用,我們認為化療會導致局部組織狀況變化並對傷口癒合造成負面影響,尤其是經動脈內 (intra-arterial, IA) 化療,通過精確地將化療藥物導向癌症部位,目前被廣泛用於晚期頭頸癌來控制局部病灶。本研究中,我們評估了經動脈 (IA)及經靜脈 (intravenous, IV) 術前化療對接受頭頸部顯微重建病患的影響。我們發現,IA化療組中傷口相關併發症的風險 (OR 3.30; 95%CI, 1.21-9.02; p=0.02), 動脈血管栓塞風險 (OR 4.98; 95%CI, 1.28-19.38; p=0.021), 及三十天內重返手術比率風險(OR 3.73; 95%CI, 1.10-12.64; p=0.035) 顯著相關上升。再者,我們對接合血管進行了病理學上比較研究。IA組血管組織的內膜/中層比率 (intima-media ratio) 明顯高於IV組(0.45±0.06 vs 0.23±0.03,p = 0.02),暗示化療藥物可能引起血管病變。此研究提供了間接證據顯示IA化療可能由於高濃度的細胞毒性而對局部組織造成了有害的後續影響,因此顯微重建外科醫師更需要進一步謹慎地面對傷口癒合與選擇接合血管。 二,探討頭皮惡性血管肉瘤的顯微重建與生存預後分析:在頭頸部顯微重建中,頭皮的顯微重建因為其覆蓋了顱骨,對保護功能及外觀具重要性,因此相對困難。而其中頭皮惡性血管肉瘤(scalp angiosarcoma)更因其屬於高度侵襲的惡性組織,有較高的局部復發率和較差的存活率。目前頭皮惡性血管肉瘤的標準治療為廣泛性手術切除結合輔助放射線療法。然而外科手術切除後常常存在大面積缺損伴有頭骨暴露,後續顯微重建上深具挑戰。由於臨床上頭皮惡性血管肉瘤發生稀少,極少相關之臨床研究文獻,對於手術切除及後續重建及傷口癒合更甚少探討。我們的研究針對頭皮惡性血管肉瘤的外科治療,從1996年至2017年找出41例診斷為頭皮惡性血管肉瘤之患者,研究其廣泛性切除術 (通常伴隨顯微游離皮瓣重建)及手術病理切緣對生存率之影響。我們發現在30例未轉移之局部病灶患者中,病理切緣陰性的廣泛切除可提高生存率。在單變項分析,無論是側面或深部的陽性切緣都是局部復發存活 (Recurrence free survival, RFS),局部區域控制 (locoregional control, LRC) 及整體存活 (overall survival, OS) 顯著的差預後因素 (p <0.05)。在多變項分析,陽性切緣之風險比Hazard Ratio (HR): RFS (HR 4.29, 95% CI, 1.71-10.75, p=0.002), LRC (HR 6.35, 95% CI, 2.19-18.37, p=0.001), OS (HR 4.73, 95% CI, 1.71-13.07, p=0.003) 顯著上升。我們並探討顯微重建對頭皮傷口癒合的影響。 三,探討飛梭雷射處置之無疤癒合機轉:由於在頭頸部顯微重建後,手術後疤痕形成會明顯影響患者外觀及自尊心。臨床改善疤痕方面,商用飛梭雷射透過微模組之微分性光熱溶解 (micropatterned fractional photothermolysis),啟動良好的傷口癒合過程進而刺激膠原蛋白新生。然而目前關於微分性光熱溶解如何達到快速癒合及其近無疤癒合的認識卻很少。我們運用小鼠皮膚動物模式,透過調整微分性光熱溶解的雷射微光束之單位能量及密度來對皮膚造成定性定量之可控制熱傷害,我們發現與燒傷引起的嚴重疤痕形成相比,成年小鼠在接受微分性光熱溶解後可以近無疤癒合。並且,有熱傷害的“閥值”來決定產生疤痕與否,在閥值以下可以進行無疤癒合,在閥值以上則是會進行疤痕性癒合。我們的假說是: 對於傷口癒合,哺乳類成年皮膚仍保有可無疤癒合的能力,並且存在一閥值門檻來決定引發無疤癒合或疤痕性癒合,而這樣的轉換機轉是透過局部微環境的發炎程度來決定。在此疤痕形成機轉研究中,我們研究皮膚接受微分性光熱溶解後傷口癒合背後的細胞動態過程,我們詳細地探討了微分性光熱溶解後組織重塑的過程,並以多光子顯微鏡進行活體組織造影。我們發現微熱溶解區 (microthermal zone) 巨觀上雖然是近無疤癒合,但微觀組織學上呈現融化之變性膠原蛋白。藉由BrdU及cyclin D1之標定,微熱溶解區傷口在二十四小時內迅速完成表皮癒合,並且上皮細胞開始迅速增生。進一步以多光子顯微鏡及倍頻訊號固定單點觀察追蹤微熱溶解區之動態組織重塑,我們發現新生膠原蛋白的沉積在受傷後第五週左右才啟動,並且持續到近六個月才恢復原本組織架構。與燒傷後快速形成之廣泛疤痕相較,微分性光熱溶解之膠原蛋白沉積明顯延遲。為了探討膠原蛋白形成之來源,我們發現在微熱溶解區中幾乎沒有成肌纖維母細胞活化也未形成肉芽組織。我們以譜系追蹤標定,發現纖維細胞在八週左右移動進入微熱溶解區,和以肌纖維母細胞為主之傳統疤痕形成機轉不同。此外,微分性光熱溶解伴隨著短暫升起的低程度發炎反應,透過比較核糖核酸序列轉錄體 (RNA sequencing transcriptome) ,我們證實了微分性光熱溶解有上皮細胞的早期遷移和低炎症特性。總結來說,探討微分性光熱溶解的動態傷口癒合過程,發現有許多與胎兒無疤癒合之相似處,這些結果將可以幫助我們進一步了解無疤癒合背後的細胞機轉,提供我們概念性上發展新的策略來幫助臨床病人加速癒合,改善疤痕反應,增加美觀及減少功能損失。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Over the past two decades, head and neck microvascular reconstruction has drastically improved the ability to manage patients with complicated defects in the affected regions and provided aesthetic and functional restoration. Meanwhile, as radiotherapy modality and chemotherapeutic reagents have greatly advanced, the paradigm of the treatment goal has shifted from survival to an improvement of a patient’s quality of life. Hence, more issues are now focused on the optimization of wound healing and achievement of normal outer appearance by secondary refinements. Thus, understanding the current challenges of wound healing and mechanisms of scar formation in the head and neck microvascular reconstruction has become an important key to improving clinical patient care. Here, we aimed to focus on three major topics: I. The impacts of chemotherapy on wound healing after head and neck microvascular reconstruction: Chemoradiation has changed the therapeutic landscape and demonstrated improved survival rates in recent years. However, their potentially detrimental role in head and neck microvascular reconstructive outcomes has not been well defined. Because of the well-known cytotoxicity effects and negative influence on wound healing from chemoradiation, we assume the local tissue condition resulting from chemotherapy regimens will pose a tough challenge for microvascular reconstruction. In particular, intra-arterial (IA) chemotherapy, which improves locoregional control by precisely directing chemotherapeutic agents towards the cancer site, is widely used for advanced head and neck cancers. First, we investigated the clinical outcomes of microvascular reconstruction in patients with prior IA and intravenous (IV) chemotherapy. We found that prior IA chemotherapy was associated with a significantly higher occurrence of wound-related complications (Odds ratio, [OR] 3.30, p=0.02), arterial thrombosis (OR 4.98, p=0.021), and an increase incidence of revision surgery within one month (OR 3.73, p=0.035). Based on histology, IA group vessels showed a higher intima/media ratio than the IV group (0.45±0.06 versus 0.23±0.03, p=0.02), indicating possible vasculopathy. The results provided evidence that IA chemotherapy may have caused subsequent deleterious effects on local tissue due to the high concentration of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. II. Microvascular reconstruction and survival outcome in scalp angiosarcoma: Microvascular reconstruction for scalp, in particular, is important since the scalp covers the calvarium and is essential for both cosmesis and protection. Scalp angiosarcomas (AS) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas and present great challenges for surgeons due to the frequently huge post-resection defects. Generally, a multimodality management regimen combining surgical wide excision and adjuvant radiotherapy is widely adopted as the standard treatment. However, due to the rarity of the disease, limited data on the clinical outcome of scalp AS are available. Here, we focused on the surgical management of scalp AS and hypothesized that wide excision, with subsequent microvascular reconstruction, would improve survival rates. We identified 41 patients with scalp AS from 1996-2017. In patients with localized disease, univariate analysis showed that wide excision with negative margins, either lateral-side or deep-side, improved survival rates. On multivariate analysis, positive margins emerged as adverse prognostic factors for RFS (Hazard Ratio (HR) 4.29, p=0.002), LRC (HR 6.35, p=0.001), and OS (HR 4.73, p=0.003). Together, we highlighted the importance of attaining negative surgical margins and subsequent microvascular reconstruction. III. Mechanism of scarless healing of fractional photothermolysis (FP) Postoperative scar formation greatly affects the self-esteem of patients, especially those who undergo microvascular reconstruction with head and neck deformity. Clinically, FP forms micropatterns of thermal injury and is widely used to improve scar by initiating a new wound healing process and stimulating collagen neogenesis. However, little is known about how FP achieves rapid scarless healing. We found that, compared with extensive scar formation induced by burns, adult mice healed scarlessly when the injury was fractionated into microzones of injury. Here, we detailed the tissue remodeling process after fractional photothermolysis histologically and examined it under transmission electron microscopy. Microscopically, the microthermal zone (MTZ) appeared as area with melted denatured collagen. Meanwhile, the MTZ re-epithelized within twenty-four hours. With multiphoton microscopy in vivo imaging, we traced the MTZ dynamic healing and found the deposition of new collagen was not initated until five weeks post injury and the collagen network was not fully restored until the 6th months. Furthermore, few myofibroblasts were activated and no granulation tissue formed. Lineage tracing revealed that collagen-secreting fibroblasts were recruited to the MTZ until the 8th week. Meanwhile, FP is characterized with transient low inflammation response. Collectively, our study indicated that the healing of FP shared many similarities with fetal scarless healing. Understanding how FP heals on the scale of microthermal injury can conceptually help us develop strategies to improve scar in clinical patients. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:32:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0707202015040000.pdf: 18056957 bytes, checksum: 2faadfb1334b240a16fd3b4ab1e2df34 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i 致謝 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv CONTENTS v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 1 LIST OF FIGURES 3 LIST OF TABLE 6 Chapter 1. Background 1.1 Head and neck cancers 7 1.2 Head and neck microvascular reconstruction 9 1.3 Wound healing 14 1.3.1 Hemostasis and inflammation 1.3.2 Proliferative phase 1.3.3 Maturation and remodeling 1.4 Scar formation 20 Chapter 2. The impacts of chemotherapy on wound healing after head and neck microvascular reconstruction 2.1 Introduction 24 2.1.1 Effects of chemotherapy on wound healing 2.1.2 Role of intraarterial chemoradiotherpy in management of head and neck cancers 2.1.3 Hypothesis and aim 2.2 Material and methods 29 2.2.1 Study design and patient selection 2.2.2 Histopathologic analysis 2.2.3 Intra-arterial (IA) chemotherapy protocols 2.2.4 Microsurgical reconstructions 2.3 Statistical analysis 33 2.4 Results 35 2.4.1 Demographics and propensity score matched analysis 2.4.2 Propensity score matching 2.4.3 Clinical outcomes 2.4.4 Risk of complications 2.4.5 Distribution of IA catheterized vessels 2.4.6 Histopathology comparison 2.5 Discussion 45 2.5.1 Effects of chemotherapy on wound healing in head and neck microvascular reconstruction 2.5.2 Effects of IA chemotherapy on artery pathology 2.5.3 Effects of IA chemotherapy on head and neck microvascular reconstruction 2.5.4 Summary Chapter 3. Microvascular reconstruction and survival outcome in scalp angiosarcoma 3.1 Introduction 50 3.1.1 Cutaneous angiosarcoma 3.1.2 Scalp angiosarcoma 3.1.3 Surgical management of scalp angiosarcoma 3.1.4 Aim of the study 3.2 Material and methods 56 3.2.1 Study design 3.2.2 Surgical treatment: wide excision with microvascular reconstruction 3.3 Statistical analysis 61 3.4 Results 62 3.4.1 Patient demographics and tumor characteristics 3.4.2 Surgical treatment of scalp AS 3.4.3 Survival outcomes of scalp AS 3.4.4 Univariate analysis of surgical treatment 3.4.5 Multivariate analysis of surgical treatment 3.5 Discussion 73 3.5.1 Survival outcome of scalp AS 3.5.2 Impacts of microvascular reconstruction on survival outcome of scalp AS 3.5.3 Summary Chapter 4. Mechanism of scar formation and management with fractional photothermolysis after head and neck microvascular reconstruction 4.1 Introduction 76 4.1.1 Fractional photothermolysis (FP) 4.1.2 Myofibroblast 4.1.3 Multiphoton microscopy and second harmonic generation 4.1.4 Hypothesis and aims 4.2 Material and methods 84 4.2.1 Animal models 4.2.2 Histological examinations 4.2.3 Scar elevation index 4.2.4 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) 4.2.5 Immunofluorescence staining 4.2.6 Multiphoton microscopy 4.2.7 Lineage tracing of Col1a2-CreERT 4.2.8 Real-time PCR 4.2.9 RNA sequencing 4.3 Results 97 4.3.1 Establishment of animal models 4.3.2 The dose effect on wound healing 4.3.3 Characterization of wound healing process 4.3.4 Re-epithelization 4.3.5 Dermal remodeling 4.3.6 In vivo dynamic imaging 4.3.7 Source of myofibroblasts 4.3.8 Lineage tracing of collagen secreting cells 4.3.9 The inflammation profile 4.3.10 Transcriptomes analysis 4.4 Discussion 144 4.4.1 Scarless healing of fractional photothermolysis 4.4.2 Rapid epithelization 4.4.3 Slow dermal collagen regeneration 4.4.4 Minimal myofibroblast 4.4.5 Low inflammation profile 4.4.6 Similarity between FP wound healing and fetal scarless healing 4.4.7 Summary Chapter 5. Conclusion and perspective 5.1 Wound healing after head and neck microvascular reconstruction 156 5.2 The mechanism of scar formation 158 Reference 161 Appendix. Related Publications 172 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 頭頸部顯微重建傷口癒合與無疤痕癒合機轉之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Study of wound healing after head and neck microvascular reconstruction and the mechanism of scarless healing | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林頌然 (Sung-Jan Lin) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 簡雄飛(Hsiung-Fei Chien),李經維(Jing-Wei Lee),黃凱文(Kai-Wen Huang),戴浩志(Hao-Chi Tai),楊宗霖(Tsung-Lin Yang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 頭頸顯微重建,傷口癒合,化學治療,惡性血管肉瘤,疤痕形成,微分式光熱溶解,飛梭雷射, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Head and neck microvascular reconstruction,wound healing,chemotherapy,angiosarcoma,scar formation,fractional photothermolysis, | en |
dc.relation.page | 174 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001366 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-07-10 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-0707202015040000.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 17.63 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。