請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15282
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 趙福杉(Fu-Shan Jaw) | |
dc.contributor.author | Kuei-You Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林奎佑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T17:29:19Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-22 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | American Academy of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (1995). Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guideline for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapy in Meniere’s disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 113, 181– 185. Blaney, S.P. (1990). Why paranasal sinuses? J Laryngol Otol, 104, 690–693. Brantberg, K., Lofqvist, L., Westin, M., Tribukait, A. (2008). Skull tap induced vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: an ipsilateral vibration response and a bilateral head acceleration response? Clin Neurophysiol, 119, 2363–2369. Colebatch, J.G., Halmagyi, G.M., Skuse, N.F. (1994). Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 57, 190–197. Curthoys, I.S. (2010). A critical review of the neurophysiological evidence underlying clinical vestibular testing using sound, vibration and galvanic stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol, 121,132–144. Farke, A.A. (2008). Frontal sinuses and head-butting in goats: a finite element analysis. J Exp Biol, 211, 3085–3094. Fatu, C., Puisoru, M., Rotaru, M., Truta, A.M. (2006). Morphometric evaluation of the frontal sinus in relation to age. Ann Anat, 188, 275–280. Franke, E.K. (1956). Response of the Human Skull to Mechanical Vibrations. J Acoust Soc Am, 28, 1277-1284. Govender, S., Rosengren, S.M., Colebatch, J.G. (2011). Vestibular neuritis has selective effects on air- and bone-conducted cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Clin Neurophysiol, 122, 1246–1255. Grant, J.W., Best, W.A., LoNigro, R. (1984). Governing equations of motion for the otolith organs and their response to a step change in velocity of the skull. J Biomech Eng, 106, 302–308. Håkansson, B., Brandt, A., Carlsson, P., Tjellström, A. (1994). Resonance frequencies in human skull in vivo. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1474-1481. Hakansson, B., Carlsson, P., Tjellstrom, A. (1986). The mechanical point impedance of the human head, with and without skin penetration. J Acoust Soc Am, 80, 1065–1075. Halmagyi, G.M. Carey, J.P. (2010). Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials- We live in interesting times. Clin Neurophysiol, 121, 631– 633. Havel, M., Ertl, L., Bauer, D., et al. (2014). Resonator properties of paranasal sinuses: preliminary results of an anatomical study. Rhinology, 52, 178–182. Holmeslet, B., Westin, M., Brantberg, K. (2011). Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential: skull taps can cause a stimulus direction dependent double-peak. Clin Neurophysiol, 122, 391–397. Howell, H.P. (1917). Voice production from the standpoint of a laryngologist. Ann Otol Rhino Laryngol, 26, 443–455. Huang, C.H., Wang, S.J., Young, Y.H. (2011). Localization and prevalence of hydrops formation in Meniere’s disease using a test battery. Audiol Neurotol, 16, 41–48. Huang, C.H., Young, Y.H. (2012). Ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in Tumarkin’s falls. Otol Neurotol, 33, 1251–1256. Huang, Y.C., Yang, T.L., Young, Y.H. (2012). Feasibility of ocular vestibularevoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) recorded with eyes closed. Clin Neurophysiol, 123, 376–381. Iwasaki, S., McGarvie, L.A., Halmagyi, G.M., Burgess, A.M., Kim, J., et al. (2007). Head taps evoke a crossed vestibulo-ocular reflex. Neurology, 68, 1227–1229. Iwasaki, S., Smulders, Y.E., Burgess, A.M., et al. (2008). Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in response to bone conducted vibration of the midline forehead at Fz. Audiol Neurotol, 13, 396–404 Iwasaki, S., Smulders, Y.E., Burgess, A.M., et al. (2008). Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to bone conducted vibration of the midline forehead at Fz in healthy subjects. Clin Neurophysiol, 119, 2135-2147. Iwasaki, S., Chihara, Y., Smulders, Y.E., Burgess, A.M., Halmagyi, G.M., et al. (2009). The role of the superior vestibular nerve in generating ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials to bone-conducted vibration at Fz. Clin Neurophysiol, 20, 588–593. Jankowski, R., Nguyen, D.T., Poussel, M, et al. (2016). Sinusology. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 133, 263–268. Jombik, P., Spodniak, P., Bahyl, V. (2011). Direction-dependent excitatory and inhibitory ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) produced by oppositely directed accelerations along the midsagittal axis of the head. Exp Brain Res, 211, 251–263. Keir, J. (2009). Why do we have paranasal sinuses? J Laryngol Otol, 123, 4–8. Koyama, T. (1966). Experimental study on the resonance of paranasal sinus. J Otolaryngol Jpn, 69, 1177–1191. Lee, M.K., Sakai, O., Spiegel, J.H. (2010). CT measurement of the frontal sinus – gender differences and implications for frontal cranioplasty. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 38, 494–500. Lin, C.M., Wang, S.J., Young, Y.H. (2010). Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials via bone-conducted vibrations applied to various midsagittal cranial sites. Otol Neurotol, 31, 157–161. Lin, K.L., Chen, C.M., Wang, S.J., Young, Y.H. (2014). Correlating vestibular schwannoma size with vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) results. Ear Hear, 35, 571–576. Lin, K.Y., Hsu, Y.S., Young, Y.H. (2010). Brainstem lesion in benign paroxysmal vertigo children: evaluated by a combined ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential test. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol, 74, 523–527. Lin, K.Y., Wang, S.J., Young, Y.H. (2012). Influence of head acceleration on ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials via bone vibration at Fz versus Fpz. Int J Audiol, 51, 551–556. Lin, K.Y., Young, Y.H. (2015). Role of ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test in assessing the occurrence of vertigo in otosclerosis patients. Clin Neurophysiol, 126, 187-193. Lin, K.Y., Yeh, T.H., Jaw, F.S., Young, Y.H. (2017). Role of frontal sinus in mediating ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials by bone vibration stimuli applied to the forehead. Audiol Neurotol, 22, 272–281. Lopez-Escamez, J.A., Carey, J., Chung, W.H., Goebel, J.A., Magnusson, M., Mandala, M., et al. (2015). Diagnostic criteria for Meniere’s disease. J Vestib Res, 25, 1–7. Manzari, L., Tedesco, A.R., Burgess, A.M., Curthoys, I.S. (2010). Ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials to bone conducted vibration in Ménière’s disease during quiescence vs during acute attacks. Clin Neurophysiol, 121, 1092–1101. Márquez, S. (2008). The paranasal sinuses: The last frontier in craniofacial biology. Anat Rec (Hoboken), 291, 1350–1361. Mavrodi, A., Paraskevas, G. (2013). Evolution of the paranasal sinuses’ anatomy through ages. Anat Cell Biol, 46, 235–238. Murofushi, T., Curthoys, I.S., Topple, A.N., Colebatch, J.G., Halmagyi, G.M. (1995). Responses of guinea pig primary vestibular neurons to clicks. Exp Brain Res, 103, 174–178. Pajic, S.S., Antic, S., Vukicevic, A.M., et al. (2017). Trauma of the frontal region is influenced by the volume of frontal sinuses. A finite element study. Front Physiol, 8, 493. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00493. Park, J., Park, B., Kim, D., Park, J. (2012). Determination of effective mass density and modulus for resonant metamaterials. J Acoust Soc Am, 132, 2793-2799. Quatrehomme, G., Fronty, P., Sapanet, M., et al. (1996). Identification by frontal sinus pattern in forensic anthropology. Forensic Sci Int, 83, 147–153. Rauch, S.D., Silveria, B., Zhou, G., Kujawa, S.G., Wall, C., Guinan, J.J., et al. (2004). Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials versus vestibular test battery in patients with Meniere’s disease. Otol Neurotol, 25, 981–986. Resnick, R., Halliday, D., Krane, K.S. (2001). Chapter 17, oscillations. Physics (5th ed.), John Wiley Sons, New York, pp. 373-400. Rosengren, S.M., Todd, N.P., Colebatch, J.G. (2005). Vestibular-evoked extraocular potentials produced by stimulation with bone-conducted sound. Clin Neurophysiol, 116, 1938–1948 Rosengren, S.M., Todd, N.P.M., Colebatch, J.G. (2009). Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by brief interaural head acceleration: properties and possible origin. J Appl Physiol, 107, 841–852. Rosengren, S.M., Welgampola, M.S., Colebatch, J.G. (2010). Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: past, present and future. Clin Neurophysiol, 121,636–651. Schoene, H. (1964). On the role of gravity in human spatial orientation. Aerosp Med., 35:764–772. Schulte-Geers, C., Obert, M., Schilling, R.L., Harth, S., Traupe, H., Gizewski, E.R., et al. (2011). Age and gender dependent bone density changes of the human skull disclosed by high-resolution flat panel computed tomography. Int J Legal Med, 125, 417–425. Shah, R.K., Dhingra, J.K., Carter, B.L., Rebeiz, E.E. (2003). Paranasal sinus development: a radiographic study. Laryngoscope, 113, 205–209. Siegman, A.E. (1986). Lasers. Sausalito, University Science Books, pp 105–108. Song, X., Zhao, B., Wang, C., et al. (2015). Dynamic response of the skull with sinuses under blunt frontal impact: a three-dimensional computational study. Comput Math Methods Med, 2015, 848079. doi: 10.1155/2015/848079. Stenfelt, S., Goode R.L. (2005). Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects. Otol Neurotol, 26, 1245-1261. Sung, P.H., Cheng, P.W., Young, Y.H. (2011). Effect of gender on ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials via various stimulation modes. Clin Neurophysiol, 122, 183–187. Tabor, Z., Karpisz, D., Wojnar, L., et al. (2009). An automatic recognition of the frontal sinus in x-ray images of skull. IEEE TransBiomed Eng, 56, 361–368. Takagi, A., Sando, I. (1988). Computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction and measurement of the vestibular end-organs. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 98, 195–202. Todd, N.P., Rosengren, S.M., Aw, S.T., Colebatch, J.G. (2007). Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (OVEMPs) produced by air- and bone-conducted sound. Clin Neurophysiol, 18, 381–390. Todd, N.P., Rosengren, S.M., Colebatch, J.G. (2008). Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials produced by impulsive transmastoid accelerations. Clin Neurophysiol, 119, 1638–1651. Todd, N.P., Rosengren, S.M., Govender, S., Colebatch, J.G. (2009). Low frequency tuning in the human vestibular-ocular projection is determined by both peripheral and central mechanisms. Neurosci Lett, 458, 43-47. Tseng, C.C., Wang, S.J., Young, Y.H. (2012). Comparison of bone-conducted vibration for eliciting ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials: forehead versus mastoid tapping. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 146, 289–294. Tseng, C.L., Chou, C.H., Young, Y.H. (2010). Aging effect on the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential results. Otol Neurotol, 31, 959–963. van Cauwenberge, P., Sys, L., de Belder, T., et al. (2004). Anatomy and physiology of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am, 24, 1–17. Varoto, P.S., de Oliveira, L.P.R. (2002). On the force drop off phenomenon in shaker testing in experimental modal analysis. Shock Vibration, 9, 165–175. Verma, P., Verma, K.G., Khosa, R., et al. (2015). Combined use of frontal sinus and nasal septum patterns as an aid in forensics: A digital radiographic study. North Am J Med Sci, 7, 47–52. Von Bekesy, G. (1932). Zur Theorie des Horens bei der Schallaufnahme durch Knochenleitung. Ann Physik, 13, 111–136. von Bekesy, G. (1960). Experiments in Hearing. New York: McGraw Hill; pp130–131. Wang, S.J., Weng, W.J., Jaw, F.S., Young, Y.H. (2010). Ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials: a study to determine whether air- or bone-conducted stimuli are optimal. Ear Hear, 31, 283–288. Wang S.J., Jaw F.S., Young Y.H. (2011). Vestibular afferents population activated by various stimulation modes for eliciting ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun, 23, 527–532. Wang, S.J., Jaw, F.S., Young, Y.H. (2012). Correlation between acceleration magnitude and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential. Neurosci Lett, 516, 75–78. Welgampola, M.S., Myrie, O.A., Minor, L.B., Carey, J.P. (2008). Vestibular-evoked myogenic potential thresholds normalize on plugging superior canal dehiscence. Neurology, 70, 464–472. Wheeler, F. (1930). The relation of the paranasal sinuses to the singing voice. Science, 72, 630. Wu, C.C., Young, Y.H. (2009). Ten-year longitudinal study of the effect of impulse noise exposure from gunshot on inner ear function. Int J Audiol, 48, 655 – 660. Yang, E.Y., Stuart, A., Stenstrom, R., Hollett, S. (1991). Effect of vibrator to head coupling force on the auditory brain stem response to bone conducted clicks in newborn infants. Ear Hear, 12, 55–60. Yang, T.H., Liu, S.H., Young, Y.H. (2010). Evaluation of guinea pig model for ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials for vestibular function test. Laryngoscope, 120, 1910–1917. Yoshino, M., Miyasaka, S., Sato, H., Seta, S. (1987). Classification system of frontal sinus patterns by radiography. Its application to identification of unknown skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int, 34, 289–299. Young, Y.H. (2013). Potential applications of ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in Meniere’s disease: a review. Laryngoscope, 123, 484–491. Zuniga, M.G., Janky, K.L., Nguyen, K.D., Welgampola, M.S., Carey, J.P. (2013). Ocular versus cervical VEMPs in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome. Otol Neurotol, 34, 121–126. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15282 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 2005年澳洲南威爾斯大學的Rosengrens及Colebatch發表「前庭誘發眼肌電位」(ocular VEMP ,oVEMP)檢查,遂開啟了研究內耳前庭器官-橢圓囊的濫殤。另一方面加上前已發表的研究內耳前庭器官-球囊的「前庭誘發頸肌電位」cervical VEMP (cVEMP) 檢查,於是耳石器官的研究乃成為近年來神經耳科學界一熱門話題。詳細來說,oVEMP檢查主要用以檢測交叉的「前庭眼反射」(vestibulo-ocular reflex,VOR)路徑,可反映橢圓囊及上前庭神經傳導的訊息。生理學上,橢圓囊的功能在檢測垂直線性加速度,感應重心位置以穩定頭位。此功能主要藉由橢圓囊斑上密集的耳石分佈來輔佐。其機制主要透過橢圓囊斑感應加速度變化所產生的剪力(shearing force)後,進一步再藉由耳石的移動來刺激毛細胞產生電位,經由輸出神經纖維(efferent fiber)傳至中樞神經系統,進行平衡覺的整合。藉由此機轉,目前oVEMP檢查在臨床上主利用氣導音聲及骨導振動兩種刺激模式來誘發。氣導音聲的刺激源為105dBnHL,500Hz 短迴旋音;反之,骨導振動乃利用迷你振盪器(B K type 4810, Naerum, Denmark)敲擊頭顱,以144 dB force level產生y軸之最大加速度0.3g,連續刺激得到結果。然而在臨床oVEMP檢查,由於氣導音聲對橢圓囊刺激的強度較弱,因此目前際普遍認為骨導振動刺激為oVEMP檢查的較佳刺激模式。 雖然骨導振動刺激為國際共識之oVEMP檢查刺激模式,但最佳刺激位置卻仍莫衷一是。根據近年來的臨床研究,敲擊頭顱正中矢狀切面均能成功地誘生oVEMP反應,其中尤以敲擊前額(forehead)的誘發率為最高。而前額敲擊的建議位置,在健康人的實驗中則證明了眉間(Fpz)與髮線(Fz)位置均可誘發相同之結果。話雖如此,在病患族群是否如此卻仍未明,主要由於許多未解的謎題,諸如迷你振盪器振動頭顱後所產生之能量在傳遞至耳石器官的過程中會因何種因素而產生改變。由於眉間(Fpz)與髮線(Fz)之間,存在著額竇(frontal sinus),而額竇的發育程度、頭顱密度及顱內軟組織的分佈,甚至是顱內疾病如鼻竇炎、中耳炎、乳突炎等,皆會影響能量的傳遞,進而影響前庭誘發眼肌電位的反應,造成檢查結果的變化。有鑒於此,於是進行實驗,希望能闡明敲擊振動與頭顱共振之間之關係,並進一步釐清干擾因子,使該檢查更為省時及有效,乃本計畫的最終目的。 於此博士論文中,我們進行了一系列的實驗來分析頭顱中前額竇對頭部振動之影響。主要分為兩個部分,其一是透過臨床實驗藉由比較年齡、性別以及不同前額竇發育程度在病患族群中對oVEMP檢查結果的影響;其二是設計假體模型驗證系統內空腔與周圍介質的互動是否會改變系統加速度的量測值,以進一步解釋支持臨床觀察到之現象。根據目前結果顯示,前額竇之存在的確會對前額敲擊後橢圓囊斑感受到的振動能量有所影響,並且前額竇空腔在未達一定大小或處在疾病狀態下時oVEMP反應之強度會因而減弱;且假體模型亦支持此項結論。然而,對於移除疾病狀態是否便可強化oVEMP反應以及是否可透過此結論使oVEMP檢查能成為前額竇生理狀態之臨床評估工具則有待後續實驗釐清。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | As known, Colebatch and Rosengren from Australia successfully demonstrated ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) in 2005. With the introduction of oVEMP and previously developed cVEMP, clinical neuro-otologists thus could assess otolithic organ function via subjective tools. Because of its importance, research on the VEMP test has dominated neuro-otological studies for the recent two decades. Meanwhile, applying VEMP tests in vestibular clinic is also more and more important for assessing otolithic organ function. In general, oVEMP test predominantly assesses the utricular function via crossed vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) pathway. Physiologically, the utricle detects head acceleration in horizontal vector, stabilizing head position and aiding postural balance. More precisely, utricular macula senses a shearing force related with the otolith displacement in response to head motion. Hence, hair cell then deflects and triggers actional potential, which transmits via efferent fibers (mainly the superior vestibular nerve) to the central nervous system for further equilibrium sensation coordination. With the feature of sensing acceleration change, there are two stimulation modes to stimulating utricle and eliciting oVEMP responses clinically, including air-conducted sound (ACS) and bone-conducted vibration (BCV). The ACS stimulation utilizes 500 Hz click sound with the intensity of 105dBnHL. For the BCV stimuli, it was generated by a vibrator placed on the subject’s head, inducing a maximal acceleration of 0.3g along the y axis, about 128dB force level. However, BCV-oVEMP is more preferred in clinical setting than ACS mode because the latter yields small response and unreliable results. Though BCV mode serves the proper way to elicit oVEMP response, the optimal stimulation site remains unclear. According to previous studies, it is known that oVEMP could be elicited by skull tapping along the mid-sagittal plane at Fpz, Fz, Cz, and inion sites, within which, the forehead tapping results in most optimal response in terms of reflex amplitude (Lin et al., 2010). And subsequent healthy control study further demonstrated that tapping at Fpz (10% of the nasion-inion distance from nasion) and Fz (30% of the nasion-inion distance from nasion) sites both result reliable oVEMP results (Lin et al., 2012). Nevertheless, Fpz and Fz still yield inconsistent oVEMP results, probably attributed to inter-individual difference along the energy transmitting from forehead to the otolithic organ. For example, frontal sinus development, skull density, intra-cranial soft tissue distribution, even the frontal disease (e.g., frontal sinusitis) all alter acceleration profiles to some extent. Based on above, to investigate possible interfering factors in energy transmission within oVEMP elicitation is necessary to improve oVEMP test protocol. In this dissertation, we performed a series of experiments to examine the effect of frontal sinus on head vibration. In clinical part, patients of various ages and genders together with various extents of frontal sinus development were recruited to examine possible factors affecting oVEMP responses in pathologic ears. While in laboratory part, acceleration profile change in systems with various air volume and filling materials via different dummy models was investigated. Current results revealed that the presence of frontal sinus would affect the oVEMP responses, likely via altering skull vibration profile after forehead vibration stimuli. Besides, inadequate pneumatization and pathological status of frontal sinus both lower oVEMP response rates. Our next step will focus on examining whether removing frontal sinus disease would strengthen oVEMP response and whether oVEMP response could reflect frontal sinus condition. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:29:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0102202117433500.pdf: 3183558 bytes, checksum: 61b7206196a56520c54632005699ef99 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Content 中文摘要 I Abstract III Chapter 1 General background 1.1 Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) 1-1 1.2 Elicitations of oVEMP via various modes 1-2 1.3 Clinical problems encountered in oVEMP elicitation 1-3 1.4 Purposes and Aims of this study 1-4 Chapter 2 Influence of head acceleration on oVEMPs via skull vibration at Fz versus Fpz sites 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 Materials and Methods 2-3 2.3 Results 2-8 2.4 Discussion 2-14 Chapter 3 Role of frontal sinus in mediating oVEMP by bone vibration stimuli applied to the forehead 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Materials and Methods 3-4 3.3 Results 3-9 3.4 Discussion 3-21 Chapter 4 A model study of resonance effect on oVEMP 4.1 Introduction 4-1 4.2 Materials and Methods 4-2 4.3 Results 4-7 4.4 Discussion 4-14 Chapter 5 Resonance effect of the frontal sinus on oVEMP recordings 5.1 Introduction 5-1 5.2 Materials and Methods 5-4 5.3 Results 5-9 5.4 Discussion 5-18 Chapter 6 Conclusions and future works 6.1 Conclusions 6-1 6.2 Future works 6-4 Reference V Appendix Publication list XIV List of Figures Chapter 2 Influence of head acceleration on oVEMPs via skull vibration at Fz versus Fpz sites Figure 2.1 Illustration of a bone vibrator placed at Fz versus Fpz 2-5 Figure 2.2 Triaxial head oscillation recorded at mastoid tip 2-9 Figure 2.3 oVEMPs via bone vibration stimuli at Fpz and Fz sites 2-11 Figure 2.4 Frequency analysis of triaxial acceleration at mastoid tip 2-13 Chapter 3 Role of frontal sinus in mediating oVEMP by bone vibration stimuli applied to the forehead Figure 3.1 Illustration of oVEMP elicitation by various tapping sites 3-3 Figure 3.2 Measurement of the frontal sinus via CT scan 3-7 Figure 3.3 oVEMPs of a male patient with Ménière’s disease 3-15 Figure 3.4 oVEMPs of a female patient with Ménière’s disease 3-16 Figure 3.5 ROC curve for predicting oVEMP presence from age 3-18 Figure 3.6 Frontal sinus morphologies in various ages and genders 3-19 Chapter 4 A model study of resonance effect on oVEMP Figure 4.1 Diagram of the dummy model 4-3 Figure 4.2 Illustration for measuring dimension of the frontal sinus 4-6 Figure 4.3 Acceleration magnitude trends in various models with altered air volume 4-9 Figure 4.4 oVEMP responses via bone vibration at various sites 4-13 Figure 4.5 Roles of bone vibration and resonance effect in oVEMP elicitation 4-18 Chapter 5 Resonance effect of the frontal sinus on oVEMP recordings Figure 5.1 Illustration of Fpz, Fz, Cz, and inion along mid-sagittal head plane in aerial view and CT scan of head 5-3 Figure 5.2 Relationship between frontal sinus volume and age 5-11 Figure 5.3 ROC curve for predicting oVEMP presence from frontal sinus volume 5-12 Figure 5.4 Demonstration of Fpz-/Fz-oVEMP responses in a patient with frontal sinusitis 5-16 Chapter 6 Conclusions and future works Figure 6.1 Flowchart of clinical oVEMP protocol 6-3 List of Tables Chapter 2 Influence of head acceleration on oVEMPs via skull vibration at Fz versus Fpz sites Table 2.1 Comparison of characteristic parameters of oVEMPs between the Fz and Fpz sites 2-12 Chapter 3 Role of frontal sinus in mediating oVEMP by bone vibration stimuli applied to the forehead Table 3.1 Comparison of oVEMP characteristic parameters between Fpz and Fz tapping modes in healthy subjects 3-10 Table 3.2 Comparison of age distribution among the 4 groups 3-13 Table 3.3 Comparison of gender based on oVEMPs via Fpz versus Fz tapping 3-14 Table 3.4 Comparison of frontal sinus morphometry 3-20 Chapter 4 A model study of resonance effect on oVEMP Table 4.1 Effects of air volume percentage on triaxial acceleration magnitudes in air-water model 4-8 Table 4.2 Comparison of z-axis acceleration magnitudes in relation to various air volume among various models 4-11 Chapter 5 Resonance effect of the frontal sinus on oVEMP recordings Table 5.1 Developmental effect (frontal sinus volume) on oVEMP recordings between the two healthy groups 5-5 Table 5.2 Reflex amplitude comparison between Fpz- and Fz-oVEMPs in healthy adults 5-13 Table 5.3 Pathological effect (frontal sinusitis) on oVEMP recordings in adults with vs. without frontal sinusitis 5-15 Table 5.4 Comparison of A-oVEMPs via air conducted sound stimuli between the two healthy groups 5-17 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 振動、加速度、及共振對於耳石反射系的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Vibration, Acceleration and Resonance on the Otolithic Reflex System | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.author-orcid | 0000-0002-0088-8893 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊怡和(Yi-Ho Young),謝建興(Jiann-Shing Shieh),陳右穎(You-Yin Chen),葉德輝(Te-Huei Yeh),鄭博文(Po-Wen Cheng) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 前庭誘發眼肌電位,骨振動刺激,前額竇,頭部加速度,共振, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | oVEMP,bone vibration stimuli,frontal sinus,head acceleration,resonance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 105 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100339 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-04 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫學工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 醫學工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-0102202117433500.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.11 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。