Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10667Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉素玲 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei-Lun Chou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 周蔚倫 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:48:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-08-06 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:48:21Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-06 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-04 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effect of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 467-477.
Abrams, R. A., & Law, M. B. (2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 818-833. Abrams, R. A., & Pratt, J. (1996). Spatially diffuse inhibition affects multiple locations: A reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1294-1298. Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K, & Caramazza, A. (2008). Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 15214-15218. Ariga, A., Yokosawa, K., & Ogawa, H. (2007). Object-based attentional selection and awareness of object. Visual Cognition, 15, 685-709. Avrahami, J. (1999). Objects of attention, objects of perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(8), 1604-1612. Bahrami, B., Lavie, N., & Rees, G. (2007). Attentional load modulates responses of human primary visual cortex to invisible stimuli. Current Biology, 17, 509-513. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 451-470. Bennett, P. J. & Pratt, J. (2001). The spatial distribution of inhibition of return. Psychological Science, 12, 76-80. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147. Brawn, P. T., & Snowden, R. J. (2000). Attention to overlapping objects: Detection and discrimination of luminance changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 342-358. Brown, J. M., Breitmeyer, B. G., Leighty, K. A., & Denney, H. I. (2006). The path of visual attention. Acta Psychologica, 121(2), 199-209. Carrasco, M., & McElree, B. (2001). Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 5363-5367. Carrasco, M., Penpeci-Talgar, C., & Eckstein, M. (2000). Spatial attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: Support for signal enhancement. Vision Research, 40, 10-12. Castel, A. D., Pratt, J., & Craik, F. I. M. (2003). The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return: Evidence from divided attention tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(6), 970-981. Chen, Z., & Cave, K. R. (2008) Object-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(8), pp. 1435-1443. Chen, H. C., & Cheng, C. M. (1999). ANOVA and trend analysis statistical program for cognitive experiment. Research in Applied Psychology, 1, 229-246. Chen, C. C., & Foley, J. M. (2004). Pattern detection: Interactions between oriented and concentric patterns. Vision Research, 44(9), 915-924. Chen, C. C., Foley, J. M., & Brainard, D. H. (2000). Detection of chromoluminance patterns on chromoluminance pedestals II: Model. Vision Research, 40(7), 789-803. Chen, C. C., & Tyler, C. W. (1999) Spatial pattern summation is phase-insensitive in the fovea but not in the periphery. Spatial Vision, 12, 267-286. Chen, C. C., & Tyler, C. W. (2001). Lateral sensitivity modulation explains the flanker effect in contrast discrimination. The Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 268, 509-516. Chen, C. C., & Tyler, C. W. (2010). Symmetry: Modeling the effects of masking noise, axial cueing and salience. PLoS One, 5(4), e9840. Chou, W. L., & Yeh, S. L. (2005). Object-based inhibition of return: Evidence from overlapping objects. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 47, 1-13. Chou, W. L., & Yeh, S. L. (2008). Location-and object-based inhibition of return are affected by different kinds of working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1761-1768. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71. Cohn, T. E., & Lasley, D. J. (1974). Detectability of a luminance increment: Effect of spatial uncertainty. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 64, 1715-1719. Danziger, S., & Kingstone, A. (1999). Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1024-1037. Davis, G. (2001). Between-object links and visual attention. Visual Cognition, 8, 411-430. Davis, G., & Driver, J. (1997). Spreading of visual attention to modally versus amodally completed regions. Psychological Science, 8(4), 275-281. Davis, G., Driver, J., Pavani, F., & Shepherd, A. (2000). Reappraising the apparent costs of attending to two separate visual objects. Vision Research, 40, 1323-1332. Davis, G., & Holmes, A. (2005). Reversal of object-based benefits in visual attention. Visual Cognition, 12, 817-846. Davis, G., Welch, V. L., Holmes, A., & Shepherd, A. (2001). Can attention select only a fixed number of objects at a time? Perception, 30, 1227-1248. Dosher, B. A., & Lu, Z.-L. (2000). Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location. Vision Research, 40, 1269-1292. Downing, C. J., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 171-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-176. Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12(2B), 201-204. Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of local attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performances, 11, 583-597. Fang, F., & He, S. (2005). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1380-1385. Fox, E., & de Fockert, J. W. (2001). Inhibitory effects of repeating color and shape: Inhibition of return or repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 798-812. Fink, G. R., Dolan, R. J., Halligan, P. W., Marshall, J. C., & Frith, C. D. (1997). Space-based and object-based visual attention: Shared and specific neural domains. Brain, 120, 2013–2028. Foley, J. M. (1994). Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: Masking experiments require a new model. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11(6), 1710-1719. Foley, J. M., & Chen C.C. (1999). Pattern detection in the presence of maskers that differ in spatial phase and temporal offset: Threshold measurements and a model. Vision Research, 39, 3855-3872. Foley, J. M., & Schwarz, W. (1998). Spatial attention: Effect of position uncertainty and number of distractor patterns on the threshold-versus-contrast function for contrast discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 15, 1036-1047. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124. Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2002). Implicit cueing by statistical contingencies affects visual search in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychological Science, 13, 6, 520-525. Gibson, B. S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 323-339. Glodsmith, M., & Yeari, M. (2003). Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 897-918. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neuroscience, 15, 20-25. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (2004). Sight unseen: An exploration of conscious and unconscious vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154-156. Goris, R. L., Wagemans, J., & Wichmann, F. A. (2008). Modeling contrast discrimination data suggest both the pedestal effect and stochastic resonance to be caused by the same mechanism. Journal of Vision, 8(15):17, 1-21. Greenwald, A. G., Spangenberg, E. R., Pratkanis, A. R., & Eskenazy, J. (1991). Double-blind tests of subliminal self-help audiotapes. Psychological Science, 2, 119-122. Haimson, C., & Behrmann, M. (2001). Cued visual attention does not distinguish between occluded and occluding objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 496-503. Han, S. M., Dosher, B. A., & Lu, Z.-L. (2003). Object attention revisited: Boundary conditions and mechanisms. Psychological Science, 14, 598-604. He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334-337. He, X., Fan, S., Zhou, K., & Chen, L. (2004). Cue validity and object-based attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(6), 1085-1097. He, X., Humphreys, G., Fan, S., Chen, L., & Han, S. (2008). Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: An event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing. Brain Research, 1245, 116-125. Ho, M. C., & Atchley, P. (in press). The influence of task and time on object-based attention. Spatial Vision. Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Neural representation of objects in space: A dual coding account. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London, Series B, 353, 1341-1351. Jiang, Y., Costello, P., Fang, F., Huang, M., & He, S. (2006). A gender- and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 17048-17052. Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (1998). Object-based inhibition of return in static display. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5 (3), 504-509. Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Spread of inhibition across an object’s surface. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 495-507. Karremans, J. C., Stroebe, W., & Claus, J. (2006). Beyond Vicary’s fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 792-798. Kasai, T., & Kondo, M. (1997). Electrophysiological correlates of attention-spreading in visual grouping. NeuroReport, 18, 93-98. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147. Kluver, H., & Bucy, P. C. (1938). An analysis of certain effects of bilateral temporal lobectomy in the rhesus monkey, with special reference to psychic blindness. Journal of Psychology, 5, 33-54. Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2006). Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 16-22. Kontsevich, L. L., & Tyler, C. W. (1999). Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold. Vision Research, 39(16), 2729-2737. Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50(3), 267-284. Kramer, A. F., Weber, T. A., & Watson, S. E. (1997). Object-based attentional selection—arrays or spatially invariant representations? Comment on Vecera and Farah (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(1), 3-13. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124. Lamy, D., & Tsal, Y. (2000). Object features, object locations, and object files: Which does selective attention activate and when? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1387-1400. Lavie N., & Driver J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1238-1251. Law, M. B., Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 402-408. Legge, G. E., Kersten, D., & Burgess, A. E. (1987). Contrast discrimination in noise. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 4, 391-404. Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 8378 - 8383. Lin, Z., & He, S. (2009). Seeing the invisible: The scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry. Progress in Neurobiology, 87, 195-211. Linnell, K. J., Humphreys, G. W., McIntyre, D. B., Laitinen, S., & Wing, A. M. (2005). Action modulates object-based selection. Vision Research, 45, 2268-2286. List, A., & Robertson, L. C. (2007). Inhibition of return and object-based attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1322-1334. Liu, S.-H., Dosher, B. A., & Lu, Z.-L. (2009). The role of judgment frames and task precision in object attention: Reduced template sharpness limits dual-object performance. Vision Research, 49, 1336-1351. Livingstone, M. S., & Hubel, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416-3468. Livingstone, M. S., & Hubel, D. H. (1988). Segregation of form, colour, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740-749. Lo, S. Y., & Yeh, S. L. (2008). Dissociation of processing time and awareness by the inattentional blindness paradigm. Consciousness & Cognition, 17, 1169-1180. Lu, Z.-L., & Dosher, B. A. (1998). External noise distinguishes mechanisms of attention. Vision Research, 38, 1183-1198. Lu, Z.-L., & Dosher, B. A. (2000). Spatial attention: Different mechanisms for central and peripheral temporal precues? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1534-1548. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Matsukura, M., & Vecera, S. P. (2006). The return of object-based attention: Selection of multiple-region objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(7), 1163-1175. Matsukura, M., & Vecera, S. P. (2009). Interference between object-based attention and object-based memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 529-536. Marino, A. C., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The role of closure in defining the 'objects' of object-based attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(7), 1140-1149. McAuliffe, J., Pratt, J., & O’Donnell, C. (2001). Examining location-based and object-based components of inhibition of return in static displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1072-1082. McCarley, J. S., Kramer, A. F., & Peterson, M. S. (2002). Overt and covert object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 751-758. Meese, T. S., Summers, R. J., Holmes, D. J., & Wallis, S. A. (2007). Contextual modulation involves suppression and facilitation from the center and the surround. Journal of Vision, 7(4), 1-21. Merigan, W. H., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 369-402. Merikle, P. M., & Skanes, H. F. (1992). Subliminal self-help audiotapes: Search for placebo effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 772–776. Moore, C. M., & Fulton, C. (2005). The spread of attention to hidden portions of occluded surfaces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 301-306. Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104-110. Mozer, M. C., & Vecera, S. P. (2005). Object- and space-based attention. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. Tsotsos (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 130-134). New York: Elsevier. Mulckhuyse, M., Talsma, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2007). Grabbing attention without knowing: Automatic capture of attention by subliminal spatial cues. Visual Cognition, 15, 779-788. Muller, H. J., & Findlay, J. M. (1987). Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 383-399. Muller, H. J., & Rabbit, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330. Muller, H. J., & von Muhlenen, A. (1996). Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(2), 224-249. Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13, 416-424. Nagaraja, N. S. (1964). Effect of luminance noise on contrast thresholds. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 54(7), 950-955. Ortells, J. J., Vellido, C. M., Daza, T., & Noguera, C. (2006). Semantic priming effects with and without perceptual awareness. Psicológica, 27, 225-242. Pelli, D. G. (1991) Noise in the visual system may be early. In M. Landy & J. A. Movshon (Eds.), Computational models of visual processing (pp. 147-152). Cambridge: MIT Press. Perenin, M.-T., & Vighetto, A. (1988). Optic ataxia: A specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects, Brain, 111, 643-674. Pestilli, F., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations. Vision Research, 45, 1867-1875. Peterson, M. S., & Kramer, A. F. (2001). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1239-1249. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556): Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R., Choate, L., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(3), 211-228. Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1343-1353. Pratt, J., & Fischer, M. H. (2002). Examining the role of the fixation cue in inhibition of return. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 294- 301. Pratt, J., Spalek, T. M., & Bradshaw, F. (1999). The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 730-746. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108. Richard, A. M., Lee, H., & Vecera, S. P. (2008). Attentional spreading in object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 842-852. Ro, T., & Rafal, R. D. (1999). Components of reflexive visual orienting to moving objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 826-836. Roelfsema, P. R., Lamme, V. A. F., & Spekreijse, H. (2000). The implementation of visual routines. Vision Research, 40, 1385-1411. Ross, J., & Speed, H. D. (1991). Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 246, 61-70. Samuel, A. G., & Kat, D. (2003). Inhibition of return: A graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties. Psychon Bull Rev, 10(4), 897-906. Schendel, K. L., Robertson, L. C., & Treisman, A. (2001). Objects and their locations in exogenous cuing. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(4), 577-594. Shaw, M. L., & Shaw, P. (1977). Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Psychophysics, 3, 201-211. Shomstein, S., & Behrmann, M. (2008). Object-based attention: Strength of object representation and attentional guidance. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 132-144. Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2002). Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? Perception & Psychophysics, 64 (1), 41-51. Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2004). Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 247-253. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267. Snowden, R. J., & Hammett, S. T. (1998). The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination. Vision Research, 38(13), 1935-1945. Snyder, J. J., Schmidt, W. C., & Kingstone, A. (2001). Attentional momentum does not underlie the inhibition of return effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1420-1432. Stuart, G. W., McAnally, K. I., & Meehan, J. W. (2003). The overlay interference task and object-selective visual attention. Vision Research, 43, 1443-53. Teo, P. C., & Heeger, D. K. (1994). Perceptual image distortion. SPIE Proceeding, 2179, 127-141. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophisics, 49, 83-90. Theeuwes, J., & Pratt, J. (2003). Inhibition of return spreads across 3-D space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 616-620. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298. Tipper, S. P., Grison, S., & Kessler, K. (2003). Long-term inhibition of return of attention. Psychological Science, 14(1), 19-25. Tipper, S. P., Jordan, H., & Weaver, B. (1999). Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: Evidence for dual orienting mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 50-60. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., & Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(3), 478-499. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Watson, F. L. (1996). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: Commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1289-1293. Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171-178. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. Tsuchiya, N., & Koch, C. (2005). Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1096-1101. Tyler, C. W., & McBride, B. (1997). The Morphonome image psychophysics software and a calibrator for Macintosh systems. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 479-484. Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994). ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 157-l 65. Vecera, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316-320. Wager, T. D., Jonides, J., & Reading, S. (2004). Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: A meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 22(4), 1679-1693. Watson, S. E., & Kramer, A. F. (1999). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 31-49. Watson, A. B., & Solomon, J. A. (1997). Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 14(9), 2379-2391. Wilson, H. R., & Humanski, R. (1993). Spatial frequency adaptation and contrast gain control. Vision Research, 33(8), 1133-1149. Wu, C. C., & Chen, C. C. (2010). Distinguishing lateral interaction from uncertainty reduction in collinear flanker effect on contrast discrimination. Journal of Vision, 10(3), 1-14. Yang, E., Zald, D. H., & Blake, R. (2007). Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression. Emotion, 7, 882-886. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence form visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-602. Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature, 396, 5, 72-75. Zenger, B., Braun, J., & Koch, C. (2000). Attentional effects on contrast detection in the presence of surround masks. Vision Research, 40(27), 3717-3724. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10667 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 研究證據支持視覺注意力可以運作在空間上或物體上，分別被稱為空間為基礎注意力以及物體為基礎注意力，兩者同時影響視覺注意力的分配。近二十年來，相關研究著重在探討空間為基礎注意力以及物體為基礎注意力的特性，然而對於兩者的內在機制以及兩者的關係著墨較少。本論文旨在對空間為基礎注意力以及物體為基礎注意力的內在機制做系統性的探討和比較。
論文第一個部份包含三個研究，分別操弄位置(第二章)、物體(第三章)以及目標物(第四章)的可見度，系列研究結果展現空間為基礎注意力和物體為基礎注意力在功能上及內在機制上的差異。論文第二個部份操弄工作記憶(第五章)以及線索有效性(第六章)，進一步在這兩個涉及較高階認知功能的向度上展現空間為基礎注意力和物體為基礎注意力的差異。 整合論文中的五個研究，空間為基礎注意力和物體為基礎注意力在不同面向中展現本質上的差異：一、操弄意識對兩者造成不同的影響， 二、兩者由不同的內在機制達成，三、涉及不同種類的工作記憶，以及，四、展現各自獨立的線索有效性。這些結果挑戰了現存的重要視覺注意力理論並且提供了新的思考方向。論文中並提出具體可檢驗的假說來解釋論文中新穎的實徵證據。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Visual attention studies have suggested two bases of selection—location-based and object-based. Location-based attention denotes that locations in the visual field are selected; object-based attention denotes that objects are selected. Location- and object-based attention are not mutually exclusive; they can influence the allocation of attention simultaneously. Over the last two decades, many studies have focused on the boundary conditions of each basis of selection; however, little is known about the underlying mechanisms of each. This thesis describes a series of five studies examining the mechanisms of location-based and object-based attention.
Section I includes three studies manipulating visibility of stimuli with respect to location (chapter 2), object (chapter 3), and target (chapter 4) and distinct functions (action/object recognition), brain pathways (dorsal/ventral pathway), and underlying mechanisms (signal enhancement/noise exclusion) of location-based and object-based attention are differentiated accordingly. Section II includes two studies manipulating high-level factors—working memory (chapter 5) and expectations (chapter 6)—and demonstrated the high-level cognitive factors also affect location-based attention and object-based attention differently. Taken together, results from these five studies show that location-based and object-based attention (1) are influenced by consciousness in different ways, (2) have different underlying mechanisms, (3) involve different kinds of working memory, and (4) rely on different aspects of cue validity. These findings challenge and shed new insights into current theories of attention. The consciousness-dependent hypothesis and the optimization hypothesis are proposed to explain the novel findings reported in this thesis. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:48:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-F90227011-1.pdf: 3202742 bytes, checksum: 45ac6da1c954af2db3f9a88b78459b21 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION: DISTINCT MECHANISMS OF LOCATION-BASED AND OBJECT-BASED ATTENTION 1
CHAPTER 2 SUBLIMINAL SPATIAL CUES CAPTURE ATTENTION AND STRENGTHEN BETWEEN-OBJECT LINK 7 ABSTRACT 7 INTRODUCTION 8 GENERAL METHOD 11 RESULTS 14 DISCUSSION 16 CHAPTER 3 OBJECT-BASED ATTENTION OCCURS REGARDLESS OF OBJECT AWARENESS 22 ABSTRACT 22 INTRODUCTION 23 METHOD 26 RESULTS 30 DISCUSSION 32 CHAPTER 4 DISTINCT MECHANISMS SUBSERVE LOCATION- AND OBJECT-BASED VISUAL ATTENTION 40 ABSTRACT 40 INTRODUCTION 41 RESULTS 45 MODEL 46 DISCUSSION 51 CONCLUSION 53 MATERIALS AND METHODS 54 CHAPTER 5 LOCATION- AND OBJECT-BASED INHIBITION OF RETURN ARE AFFECTED BY DIFFERENT KINDS OF WORKING MEMORY 62 ABSTRACT 62 INTRODUCTION 63 EXPERIMENT 1 65 EXPERIMENT 2 70 GENERAL DISCUSSION 72 CHAPTER 6 OPTIMIZING ATTENTION DEPLOYMENT IN OBJECT-BASED ATTENTION: THE ROLE OF CUE VALIDITY 77 ABSTRACT 77 INTRODUCTION 78 GENERAL METHOD 82 RESULTS 84 GENERAL DISCUSSION 86 CHAPTER 7 GENERAL DISCUSSION 91 REFERENCES 95 APPENDIX A OBJECT-BASED INHIBITION OF RETURN: EVIDENCE FROM OVERLAPPING OBJECTS 106 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 注意力分配在空間上和物體上之機制差異 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Distinct Mechanisms of Location-Based and Object-Based Visual Attention | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃榮村,陳建中,阮啟弘,黃淑麗 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 雙矩型派典,閾下空間線索,物體意識,訊號增強,雜訊排除,工作記憶,線索有效性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | double-rectangle paradigm,subliminal spatial cue,object awareness,signal enhancement,noise exclusion,working memory,cue validity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 118 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-04 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 心理學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf | 3.13 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.