請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10644
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳淑惠(Sue-Huei Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-han Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉于涵 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:46:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-08-20 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:46:22Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
中文參考文獻 孔繁鐘、孔繁錦(2000)。「精神疾病診斷準則手冊(第四版)」。台北:合記 江佩娟 (2002)。「精神分裂症症狀與非精神病性家屬的分裂病性人格特質:家族研究」(未發表之碩士論文)。國立台灣大學流行病學研究所。 台北市立療養院(2000)。「精神疾病漫談:精神疾病會遺傳嗎、精神疾病的治療效果」。取自網站 http://www.tcpc.gov.tw 李明濱(1999)。「實用精神醫學(第二版)」。台北:國立台灣大學醫學院 林鍾淑敏 (2002)。「走在荊棘路上-精神分裂症青少年疾患的疾病經驗與適應歷程」 (未發表之碩士論文)。國立台灣大學社會學研究所。 胡海國 (1997)。精神分裂症之症狀學:疾病分類與文化的關連性。「台灣精神 醫學」,11,211-228。 胡海國、林信男編譯(1996)。「ICD-10精神與行為障礙之分類、診斷指引」。臺北:中華民國精神醫學會。 翁儷禎 (1995)。因素分析應用之一覽。見章英華、傅仰止、瞿海源(主編):「社會調查與分析-社會科學方法檢討與前瞻之一」,頁 245-259。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。 張景瑞、胡海國、葉玲玲、張宏俊 (1995)。出院精神分裂症患者社區生活適 應的預測因子。「中華精神醫學」,9,203-211。 許惠淳 (1998)。「缺損型與非缺損型精分裂症患者對臉部情緒的辨識」(未發表之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學心理學硏究所。 曾文星、徐靜(1998)。「現代精神醫學」。台北:水牛出版社。 楊連謙、郭葉珍編譯(1991)。「家屬與精神病患」。台北:合記。 龔卓軍。(2006)。身體感:胡塞爾對身體的形構分析。「應用心理研究」,29,157-181 英文參考文獻 Asai, T., & Tanno, Y. (2008). Highly schizotypal students have a weaker sense of self-agency. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 62(1), 115-119. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC:Author. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.) Washington, DC:Author. Chen, W. J., Lien, Y. J., Tsuang, H. C., Chiang, A., Liu, C. M., Hsieh, M. H., et al. (2010). The Multidimensionality of Schizotypy in Nonpsychotic Relatives of Patients with Schizophrenia and Its Applications in Ordered Subsets Linkage Analysis of Schizophrenia. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B-Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 153B(1), 1-9. Chen, W. J., Liu, S. K., Chang, C. J., Lien, Y. J., Chang, Y. H., & Hwu, H. G. (1998). Sustained attention deficit and schizotypal personality features in nonpsychotic relatives of schizophrenic patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(9), 1214-1220. Cornblatt B.A., Lencz T., Smith C.W., Correll C.U., Auther A.M.,Nakayama E. (2003) The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neurodevelopmental perspective. Schizophrrenia Bulletin, 29,633–651. Cornett, C.W.(1989) . Schizoid adaptation in childhood:symptomatology & treatment. Child and Adolescent Social Work ,6(2) ,99-113. Davidsen, K. A. (2009). Anomalous Self-Experience in Adolescents at Risk of Psychosis Clinical and Conceptual Elucidation. Psychopathology, 42(6), 361-369. Estroff, S. E. (1989). Self, Identity, and Subjective Experiences of Schizophrenia - in Search of the Subject. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 15(2), 189-196. Gross,G. (1989). The ‘basic’ symptoms of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 155 (suppl. 7), 21 -25. Handest, P., & Parnas, J. (2005). Clinical characteristics of first-admitted patients with ICD-10 schizotypal disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187, S49-S54. Haroun, N., Dunn, L., Haroun, A., Cadenhead, K.S. (2006). Risk and protection in prodromal schizophrenia: Ethical implications for clinical practice and future research. Schizophrrenia Bulletin, 32,166–178. Hollis,Chris (1995). Child and adolescent (juvenile onset) schizophrenia : A case control study of premorbid developmental impairments. British Journal of Psychiatry,166,489-495 Kean, C. (2009). Silencing the Self: Schizophrenia as a Self-disturbance. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35(6), 1034-1036. Kendler, K. S., Lieberman, J. A., & Walsh, D. (1989). The Structured Interview for Schizotypy (Sis):A preliminary report. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 15(4), 559-571. Klosterkotter, J., Hellmich, M., Steinmeyer, E. M., & Schultze-Lutter, F. (2001). Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58(2), 158-164. Liu,C.C., Lai, M.C., Chiu,Y.N., Hsieh, M.H., Hwang, T.J., Chien, Y.L., Chen, W.J., Hua, M.S., Hsiung, P.C., Huang, Y.C., Hwu, H.G. (2011). Follow-up of subjects with suspected pre-psychotic state in Taiwan. Schizophr Research, 126, 65-70. Lysaker, P. H., & Lysaker, J. T. (2010). Schizophrenia and Alterations in Self-experience: A Comparison of 6 Perspectives. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36(2), 331-340. McGorry, P. (1998). Preventive strategies in early psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172(suppl.33s), 1-2. McGorry, P.D., Goodwin, R.J., Stuart, G.W. (1988). The development, use and reliability of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale(nursing modification)—an assessment procedure for the nursing team in clinical and research settings. Comprehensive. Psychiatry, 29,575– 587. McGorry, P.D., Yung, A.R., Phillips, L.J., (2003). The “close-in” or ultra high-risk model: A safe and effective strategy for research and clinical intervention in prepsychotic mental disorder. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 29 (4), 771–790. Narvaez, J.M., Twamley, E.W., McKibbin, C.L., Heaton, R.K., Patterson, T.L. (2008) Subjective and objective quality of life in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 98(1-3),201-208. Miller, T. J., McGlashan, T. H., Woods, S. W., Stein, K., Driesen, N., Corcoran, C. M., et al. (1999). Symptom assessment in schizophrenic prodromal states. Psychiatric Quarterly, 70(4), 273-287. Parnas, J., & Handest, P. (2003). Phenomenology of anomalous self-experience in early schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 44(2), 121-134. Parnas, J., Handest, P., Jansson, L., & Saebye, D. (2005). Anomalous subjective experience among first-admitted schizophrenia spectrum patients: Empirical investigation. Psychopathology, 38(5), 259-267. Parnas, J., Handest, P., Saebye, D., & Jansson, L. (2003). Anomalies of subjective experience in schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar illness. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 108(2), 126-133. Parnas, J., Moller, P., Kircher, T., Thalbitzer, J., Jansson, L., Handest, P., et al. (2005). EASE: Examination of anomalous self-experience. Psychopathology, 38(5), 236-258. Sass, L. A., & Parnas, J. (2003). Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29(3), 427-444. Schultze-Lutter, F., Ruhrmann, S., Berning, J., Maier, W., & Klosterkotter, J. (2010). Basic symptoms and ultrahigh risk criteria: Symptom development in the initial prodromal state. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36(1), 182-191. Taylor, E.H. (1998). Advance in the diagnosis and treatment of children with serious mental illness. Child Welfare ,77(3), 311-332. Tolman, A.W., Kurtz, M.M.(2010) Neurocognitive Predictors of Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Individuals With Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Schizophrrenia Bulletin,doi: 10.1093 Yung, A.R., Phillips, L.J., McGorry, P.D., McFarlane, C.A., Francey, S., Harrigan,S., ... Jackson, H.J.(1998).Prediction of psychosis. A step towards indicated prevention of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry., Suppl. 172, 14–20. Yung, A. R., & McGorry, P. D. (1996). The prodromal phase of first-episode psychosis: Past and current conceptualizations. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 22(2), 353-370. Yung, A.R., Stanford, C., Cosgrave, E.,Killackey, E., Philips, L., Nelson, B., McGorry, P.D. (2006). Testing the ultra high risk (prodromal) criteria for the prediction of psychosis in a clinical sample of young people. Schizophrenia Research, 84,57–66. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10644 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 自我的崩解、毀壞是精神分裂症的核心基礎,並且在疾病的前驅期即會出現一些因自我感改變所造成的異常自我經驗。本研究之目的在探索自我感困擾在不同罹病風險程度族群中的差別,及個體於疾病演進歷程中自我感的變化趨勢,以擴充對精神分裂症自我感困擾的認識。此外,本研究試圖了解風險族群中,自我感困擾對於日後精神分裂症是否發病的預測力,以期能提昇早期篩檢之精確度以利早期介入,進而降低精神分裂症對個體造成的影響。本研究藉由學校、醫院轉介系統以及大眾傳播媒體募集324位較具罹患精神分裂症風險之參與者。藉由臨床專業評估,依其風險程度分為:極高風險組(52人)、中度風險組(41人)與邊緣風險組(44人);亦包48位精神分裂症初次發病患者,以及139位健康正常參與者,以玆對照。使用工具為自填式問卷,包括:基本資料、前驅症狀量表、自我感量表以及身材外貌及自信評估。本研究採前瞻式研究方法,除了基礎線期的測量外,初次發病組及極高風險組每半年追蹤一次,其餘風險組及正常對照組則一年追蹤一次,追蹤為期兩年。研究結果顯示自我感困擾與正負性及解構症狀之相關未達顯著,然而與部分一般症狀達顯著相關(如睡眠障礙、不悅情緒)。不同風險組間的自我感困擾無顯著差異;然而風險組及初次發病組的自我感困擾則均與正常對照組有顯著差異,顯示自我感困擾可區辨正常組及臨床組。自我感困擾嚴重度有隨著精神分裂症風險程度的升高而升高的趨勢。然而發病之後,其自我感困擾卻明顯下降。「自我認同遲鈍不確定」及「身材外貌現在相對於過去的差異」對於個體是否會轉變發病為精神分裂症最具預測力。本研究據以進行理論及臨床應用上之討論。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Self-disturbance is a disturbance caused by the alteration of the basic sense of self. It may be the core feature of schizophrenia and its prodrome. The purpose of the study was to explore the details of self-disturbance in individuals of different risk levels of schizophrenia, and to examine whether self-disturbance can be predictive to psychosis. A prospective study was designed on participants recruited by referrals from a community-based population. Through clinical interviews by experienced psychiatrists, three pre-psychotic risk groups were established: an ultra-high risk group (UHR; n = 52), an intermediate-risk group (IRG; n = 41), and a marginal-risk group (MRG; n = 44). Also 48 participants with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and 139 healthy controls (NC group) were recruited as comparison. All participants were examine with Sense of Self Scale (SOS) to assess the severity of their self-disturbance, and the scale of appraisal of appearance and self-confidence to assess their subjective appraisal of the past, present and ideal appearance and self-confidence. In the two-year follow-up, the FEP and UHR were followed twice a year, and the rest once a year. Results revealed that self-disturbance could discriminate the healthy control and clinical groups (i.e. risk groups and first-episode group). And no matter observed within or between groups, the trend of alteration in self-disturbance existed as that its severity increased as risk level increased; however, when participants converted to psychosis, the severity of self-disturbance decreased. Besides, one subscale of sense of self and discrepancy between appraisal of present and past appearance were predictive to the full-blown of psychosis. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:46:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R96227203-1.pdf: 1116185 bytes, checksum: 8efa8adc081cfbc601ced887890f75d3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
第一章 文獻回顧 1 第一節 精神分裂症 1 第二節 精神分裂症前驅期 5 第三節 精神分裂症之自我感改變 10 第四節 研究目的 18 第二章 研究方法 19 第一節 研究對象 19 第二節 研究程序 19 第三節 研究工具 22 第四節 統計分析 28 第三章 研究結果 29 第一節 樣本特徵與流失分析 29 第二節 風險程度效果檢驗 32 第三節 轉變發病組 vs. 未轉變發病組 41 第四節 自我感困擾對於精神分裂症之迴歸分析 46 第四章 討論 49 第一節 自我感與精神症狀之相關 49 第二節 風險程度效果檢驗 49 第三節 自我感困擾變化趨勢 50 第四節 自我感困擾對精神分裂症之預測力 52 第五節 研究限制與研究貢獻 53 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 精神分裂症風險青少年之自我感探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Sense of Self in Adolescents at Risk of Schizophrenia | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 熊秉荃(Ping-Chuan Hsiung),劉震鐘(Chen-Chung Liu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 精神分裂症,自我感困擾,異常自我經驗,極高風險, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | prodrome,schizophrenia,self-disturbance,anomalous self-experience,ultra-high risk, | en |
dc.relation.page | 64 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf | 1.09 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。