請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10641
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林子倫(Tze-Luen Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Liang-Yu Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳亮宇 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:46:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-13 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:46:07Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
丁一匯、石永怡,2009,《氣候變化高端訪談》,北京:氣象出版社。 人民網,2008,〈全文發布:《中國應對氣候變化的政策與行動》〉,http://env.people.com.cn/BIG5/8252344.html,2008/10/29。檢索日期:2009年1月25日。 山東科技港,2010,〈濟南市低碳經濟戰略規劃研究(專案)正式啟動〉,http://www.sdkjg.com/article/2010/0115/article_11970.html,2010/01/15。檢索日期:2010年3月29日。 丘昌泰,1995,《公共政策:當代政策科學理論之研究》,台北:巨流。 丘昌泰,2008,《公共政策基礎篇》,台北:巨流。 中國科學院可持續發展戰略研究組,2009,《2009中國可持續發展戰略報告:探索中國特色的低碳道路》,北京:科學出版社。 中國新聞網,〈港澳臺媒體評哥本哈根氣候會議:「中國做對了」〉,http://big5.chinanews.com.cn:89/ga/ga-xxbp/news/2009/12-24/2037217.shtml,2009/12/24。檢索日期:2010年3月21日。 中國網,2006,〈國務院關於加強節能工作的決定〉,http://www.china.com.cn/policy/txt/2006-08/23/content_7099667.htm,2006/08/23。檢索日期:2009年8月17日。 中國網,2007,〈中國氣候變化專家委員會成立,壓力不亞於加入WTO〉,http://big5.china.com.cn/news/txt/2007-01/23/content_7697170.htm,2007/01/23。檢索日期:2009年6月15日。 自由時報,2009,〈G8+G5讓步 減碳降溫達共識〉,7月14日,A10。 自然之友,2007a,《公民社會在行動:氣候變化對中國的影響及中國公民的思與行》,北京:自然之友。 自然之友,2007b,《公民社會看氣候:中國公民社會應對氣候變化可行性研究報告》,北京:自然之友。 自然之友,2009,《中國公民社會因應氣候變化的立場》,北京:自然之友。 全球環境研究所,2009,《全球環境研究所2008年度報告》,北京:全球環境研究所。 汪永晨、王愛軍,2009,《綠色使者──國際在華環保NGO調查》,北京:北京出版集團北京出版社。 李河清,2004,〈知識社群與全球氣候談判〉,《問題與研究》,43(6): 73-102。 冷則剛,2006,〈全球化與政治〉,陳義彥主編,《政治學(下)》,台北:五南,頁301-340。 余國媛,2009,《環境議題跨國倡議網絡之研究──以中國熊膽之爭議為例》,台北:台灣大學政治學系碩士論文。 宋燕輝,2002,〈美國與京都議定書──小布希政府氣候變化政策急轉彎?〉,《理論與政策》,16(2): 27-45。 吳明蕙,2007,〈中國能源問題之探討〉,《經濟研究》,7: 263-295。 吳福悠,2007,《權力、利益及知識的互動:以國際氣候變遷體制為例》,台南:成功大學政治經濟學研究所碩士論文。 林子倫,2006,〈城市與氣候變遷:後京都時代的都市環境治理〉,余致力主編,《新世紀公共政策理論與實務》,台北:世新大學,頁209-230。 林子倫,2008,〈台灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析〉,《公共行政學報》,28: 135-175。 林秀芬、李國光,2006,〈網路知識社群服務品質評估模式建構之研究〉,《電子商務研究》,4(2): 211-234。 林廷輝,2004,〈從環境主義觀點探討全球暖化管制問題〉,《逢甲人文社會學報》,8: 287-302。 林嘉誠,2004,〈知識型政府的理念〉,《國家政策季刊》,3(1): 5-20。 姜克隽、胡秀蓮,〈中國的能源與環境〉,宋立剛、胡永泰主編,《經濟增長、環境與氣候變遷:中國的政策選擇》,北京:社會科學文獻出版社,頁269-286。 施奕任,2008,〈中國對全球暖化問題的因應-環境政治學的觀點〉,《政治學報》,45: 139-164。 氣候變化信息網,2009,〈中國-歐盟清潔發展機制促進專案進展情況簡介〉,http://www.ccchina.gov.cn/WebSite/CCChina/UpFile/File418.pdf,2009/03。檢索日期:2010年3月30日。 康世昊,2009,〈台、中環境行動者的對談與政策〉,苦勞網,http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/47490,2009/10/16。檢索日期:2010年4月5日。 曹俊漢,1977,〈科學家對國家公共政策制定影響度之分析:美國模式與經驗的研究〉,《美國研究》,7(1): 75-124。 曹俊漢,1990,《公共政策》,台北:三民書局。 曹俊漢,2002,《行政現代化的迷思》,台北:韋伯文化。 曹俊漢,2009,《全球化與全球治理:理論發展的建構與詮釋》,台北:韋伯文化。 許峻賓,2009,〈國際環境議題在國際結構中的運作〉,江啟臣主編,《太平洋區域年鑑:2008-2009》,台北:太平洋經合會中華民國委員會,頁129-141。 陳世榮,2005,〈向權力說真相:科技專家政策評議活動的考察〉,「2005年台灣政治學會年會暨台灣民主的挑戰與前景學術研討會」論文(12月11日),台北:政治大學。 陳迎,2007,〈把握中國在氣候變化上核心利益〉,中國科學技術協會學會學術部主編,《未來幾年氣候變化研究向何處去》,北京:中國科學技術出版社,頁2-5。 陳佳成,2002,《國際體制形成之探討:以京都議定書為例》,台中:東海大學政治學系碩士論文。 陳恆鈞,2001,〈政策制定者應用政策之困境分析〉,《台灣政治學刊》,5: 132-177。 陳恆鈞,2004,〈資訊運用與政策制定〉,《國家政策季刊》,3(1): 81-97。 陶儀芬,2008,〈全球化、民粹主義與公共知識社群〉,《思想》,9: 223-231。 傅岳邦,2009,〈京都議定書與中國大陸的環境變革〉,《中共研究》,43(7): 80-95。 湯京平、廖坤榮,2004,〈科技政策與民主化:台灣發展電動機車經驗的政治經濟分析〉,《公共行政學報》,11: 1-34。 新浪網,2009,〈碳金融:尚未挖掘的“富礦”〉,http://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/20091210/17207086298.shtml,2009/12/10。檢索日期:2010年3月26日。 新華網,2008〈我國首個專業車用能源研究中心在清華大學成立〉,http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2008-04/20/content_8012654.htm,2008/04/20。檢索日期:2010年3月26日。 黃之棟、黃瑞祺,2007,〈追尋公正的氣候變遷:探尋正義在全球環境變遷科學中的角色〉,《社會理論學報》,10(2): 417-444。 黃之棟、黃瑞祺,2008,〈科技與社會的交叉點:以全球暖化為例〉,《科學教育月刊》,306: 18-26。 黃俊傑,2000,〈論大學的知識社群特質〉,《通識教育季刊》,7(4): 1-17。 黃偉峰,2000,〈「知識社群」研究取向如何應用在歐洲與東亞經濟貨幣整合?方法論的困境與解決之道〉,《問題與研究》,39(5): 47-69。 葉育安,2008,《中國與日本參與東亞地區環境建制之比較》,台北:東吳大學政治學系碩士論文。 綠色和平,2008,《氣候變化與中國糧食安全》,香港:綠色和平。 劉洪濱,2007,〈在IPCC報告編寫的體會與建議〉,中國科學技術協會學會學術部主編,《未來幾年氣候變化研究向何處去》,北京:中國科學技術出版社,頁55-62。 興業銀行,2010,〈興業銀行發佈國內銀行業首份可持續發展報告〉,http://www.cib.com.cn/netbank/cn/About_IB/Whatxs_New/20100309.html,2010/03/09。檢索日期:2010年3月26日。 蔡文軒,2006,〈中國該往何處去?知識社群的思考〉,《政治科學論叢》,29: 123-158。 蔡政文,1989,《當前國際關係理論發展及其評估》,台北:三民書局。 聯合報,2009,〈G8峰會�全球氣溫不得上升逾2℃〉,7月10日,A7。 羅永青,2002,《後冷戰時期中共的環境外交──以聯合國氣候變化綱要公約的參與為例》,高雄:中山大學大陸研究所碩士論文。 蘇彥駿,2004,《中國參與國際建制的行為分析──以環保建制為例》,台北:東吳大學政治學系碩士論文。 貳、英文部分 Adler, Emanuel. 1992. “The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control.” International Organization, 46(1): 101-145. Adler, Emanuel and Peter M. Haas. 1992. “Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program.” International Organization, 46(1): 367-390. Agnew, John and Stuart Corbridge. 1995. Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy. New York: Routledge. Bestill, Michele and Harriet Bulkeley. 2004.“Transnational Networks and Global Environmental Governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program.”International Studies Quarterly, 48: 471-493. Bestill, Michele and Harriet Bulkeley. 2006. “Cities and The Multilevel Governance of Global Climate Change.”Global Governance, 12: 141-159. Boehmer-Christiansen, Sonja. 1993. “Science Policy, the IPCC and the Climate Convention: The Codification of a Global Research Agenda. ” Energy and Environment 4, 4: 362-408. Boehmer-Christiansen, Sonja. 1995. “Britain and the International Panel on Climate Change: The Impacts of Scientific Advice on Global Warming Part I: Integrated Policy Analysis and Global Dimension.” Environmental Politics 4, 1: 1-18. Boehmer-Christiansen, Sonja, and Aynsley Kellow. 2002. International Environmental Policy: Interests and the Failure of Kyoto Process. London: Edward Elgar. Breyman, Steve. 1993. “Knowledge as Power: Ecology Movements and Global Environmental Problems.” in The State and Social Power in Global Environmental Politics, edited by Lipschutz, Ronnie D. and Ken Conca. New York: Columbia University, 124-157. Broadhead, Lee-Anne. 2002. International Environmental Politics: The Limits of Green Diplomacy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Bulkeley, Harriet. 2000. “Discourse Coalitions and the Australian Climate Change Policy Network.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18: 727-748. Bulkeley, Harriet and Michele M. Bestill. 2005. Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance. New York: Routledge. Buttel, Frederick H. 2000. “Classical Theory and Contemporary Environmental Sociology.” in Environment and Global Modernity, edited by Gert Spaargaren, Arthur P. J. Mor and Frederick H. Buttel. London: Sage, 17-39. Caldwell, Lynton K. 1993. “Environmental Policy as a Political Problem.” Policy Studies Review, 12(3): 104-117. Castells, Manuel. 1997. The Power of Identity. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell. Chan, Gerald. 2006. China’s Compliance in Global Affairs: Trade, Arms Control, Environmental Protection, Human Rights. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing. Conca, Ken and Ronnie D. Lipschutz. 1993. “A Tale of Two Forests.” in The State and Social Power in Global Environmental Politics, edited by Lipschutz, Ronnie D. and Ken Conca. New York: Columbia University, 1-18. DeSombre, Elizabeth R. 2007. The Global Environment and World Politics. 2nd ed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group. Dimitrov, Radoslav S. 2003. “Knowledge, Power, and Interests in Environmental Regime Formation.”International Studies Quarterly, 47: 123-150. Dowding, Keith. 1995. “Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach.” Political Studies, XLIII: 136-158. Drake, W.J. and K. Nicolaïdis. 1992. “Ideas, Interests, and Institutionalization: ‘Trade is Services’ and the Uruguay Round.” International Organization, 46(1): 37-100. Economy, Elizabeth. 1997. “Chinese Policy-making and global climate change: two-front diplomacy and the international community.” in The Internationalization of Environmental Protection, edited by Schreurs, Miranda A. and E. Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 19-41. Economy, Elizabeth. 1998. “China’s Environmental Diplomacy.” in China and the World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium(4th ed.), edited by Samuel S Kim. Colorado: Westview Press, 264-283. Economy, Elizabeth. 2001. “The Impact of International Regimes on Chinese Foreign Policy-Making: Broadening Perspectives and Policies…But Only to a Point.” in The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform, 1978-2000, edited by David M. Lampton. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 230-253. Energy Information Agency(EIA). 2007. International Energy Outlook. Washington, DC: Department of Energy. Fischer, Frank. 2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. London and New York: Oxford University Press. Fischer, Frank and Maarten A. Hajer (ed). 1999. Living with Nature: Environmental Politics as Cultural Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press. Haas, Ernst M. 1990. When Knowledge Is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press. Haas, Peter M. 1990. Saving the Mediterranean. New York: Columbia University Press. Haas, Peter M. 1992a. “Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Effort to Protect Stratospberic Ozone.” International Organization, 46(1): 187-224. Haas, Peter M. 1992b. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization, 46(1): 1-35. Haas, Peter M. 2004. “When does power listen to truth? A Constructivist Approach to The Policy Process.” Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4): 569-592. Haggard, Stephan and Beth A. Simmons. 1987. “Theories of International Regimes.”International Organization, 41(3): 491-517. Hajer, Maarten A. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Heclo, Hugh. 1978. “Issue Networks and The Executive Establishment.” in The New American Political System, edited by Anthony King. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 270-303. Heclo, Hugh and Aaron Wildavsky. 1974. The Private Government of Public Money: Community and Policy Inside British Politics. London: Macmillan. Helm, Carsten and Detlef F. Spring. 2000. “Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(5): 630-652. Hopkins, Raymond F. 1992. “Reform in the International Food Aid Regime: The Role of Consensual Knowledge.” International Organization, 46(1): 225-264. Hu, Richard Weixing. 1997. “Play by International Rules: The Development of China's Nuclear Export Controls.” The Monitor, 3/4(4/1): 19-27. Ikenberry, G John. 1992. “A World Economy Restored: Expert Consensus and the Anglo-American Postwar Settlement.” International Organization, 46(1): 289-321. IPCC, 2007, “Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis.” Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller. New York: Cambridge University Press. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1997. “NGOs and the Environment: From Knowledge to Action.” Third World Quarterly, 18(3): 579-594. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2006. “Technology as a Site and Object of Politics.” in Contextual Political Analysis, edited by Goodin, Robert E. and Charles Tilly. New York: Oxford University Press, 745-764. Jahiel, Abigail R. 2007. “China, the WTO, and Implications for the Environment.” in Environmental Governance in China, edited by Neil T. Carter and Arthur P. J. Mol. New York: Routledge, 162-181. Jenkins-Smith, Hank and Paul A. Sabatier. 1994. Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Journal of Public Policy, 14: 175-203. Kapstein, Ethan Barnaby. 1992. “Between Power and Purpose: Central Bankers and the Politics of Regulatory Convergence.” International Organization, 46(1): 265-287. Keck Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye. 2000.“Globalization: What’s New? What’s Not? (And So What?).” Foreign Policy, 118: 104-120. Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye. 2001. Power and Interdependence. (3rd ed.) New York : Longman. Kim, Samuel S. 1998. “Chinese Foreign Policy in Theory and Practice.” in China and World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium(4th ed). edited by Kim, Samuel S. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 3-33. Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Lasswell, Harold D. 1951. “The Policy Orientation.” in Policy Science, edited by Daniel Lerner and Harold D. Lasswell. Stanford University Press, 3-15. Lasswell, Harold D. 1968. “Policy Science.” International Encyclopedia of the Social Science, 12: 181-188. Lahsen, Myanna. 2007. “Trust Through Participation? Problems of Knowledge in Climate Decision Making.” in The Social Construction of Climate Change: Power, Knowledge, Norms, Discourses. edited by Pettenger, Mary E. Burlington, VT : Ashgate, 173-196. Lipschutz, Ronnie D. 1997. “Networks of Knowledge and Practice: Global Civil Society and Protection of the Global Environment.” in Saving the Seas: Values, Scientists, and International Governance, edited by L. Anathea Brooks and Stacy D.Vandeveer. College Park, MD: Maryland Sea Grant College, 427-268. Litfin, Karen T. 1994. Ozone Discourse: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press. Luke, Timothy W. 1995. “Sustainable development as a power/knowledge system: the problem of ‘governmentality’.” in Greening Environmental Policy: The Politics of a Sustainable Future. edited by Frank Fischer and Michael Black. London: Paul Chapman, 21-32. Marsh, David and Rodes, R.A.W. 1992. “Policy Communities and Issue Networks: Beyond Typology”, in Policy Networks in British Government, edited by David Marsh and R.A.W. Rodes. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 249-268. Miller, Hugh T. and Fox, Charles J. 2001. “The Epistemic Community.” Administration & Society, 32(6): 668-685. Moore, Thomas G. 2000. “China and Globalization.” in East Asia and Globalization, edited by Kim, Samuel S. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 105-131. Oksenberg, Michel and Elizabeth Economy. 1997. Shaping U.S-China Relations: A Long-Term Strategy: A Council on Foreign Relations Study Group Report. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. Paterson, Matthew. 2001. Understanding Global Environmental Politics: Domination, Accumulation, Resistance. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave. Paterson, Matthew. 2006. “Theoretical Perspectives on International Environmental Politics.” in Palgrave Advances in International Environmental Politics, edited by Betsill, Michele M., Kathryn Hochstetler, and Dimitris Stevis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 54-81. Peterson, M. J. 1992. “Whalers, Cetologists, Environmentalists, and the International Management of Whaling.” International Organization, 46(1): 147-186. Pierre, Jon and B. Guy Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics, and the State. New York: St. Martin's Press Rodes, R.A.W. 2006. “Policy Network Analysis.” in The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, edited by Moran Michael. London and New Work: Oxford University, Press, 425-447. Sabatier, Paul A. 1987. “Knowledge, Policy-Oriented learning, and Policy Change: An Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Knowledge, Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8: 648-692. Schreurs, Miranda A. 2008. “From Bottom Up: Local Subnational Climate Change Politics.” The Journal of Environment Development, 17(4): 343-355. Schroeder, Heike, Leslie A. King and Simon Tay. 2008. “Contributing to the Science-Policy Interface: Policy Relevance of Findings on the Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change.” in Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers, edited by Young, Oran R., Leslie A. King, and Heike Schroeder. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 261-276. Sebenius, James K. 1992. “Challenging Conventional Explanations of International Cooperation: Negotiation Analysis and the Case of Epistemic Communities.” International Organization, 46(1): 323-365. Spring Detlef F. and Carsten Helm. 1999. “The Effect of Global Environmental Refimes: A Measurement Concept.” International Political Science Review, 20(4): 359-369 Stone, Deborah. 2002. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making(revised edition). New York: W. W. Norton. Sundquist, James. 1978. “Research Brokerage: The Weak Link.” in Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection, edited by Lawrence E. Lynn, Jr. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciencces, 126-144. The New York Times. 2008. “Obama Affirms Climate Change Goals.” http://www.nyti mes.com/2008/11/19/us/politics/19climate.html?_r=3&oref=slogin. Latest update 22 July 2009. Wapner, Paul. 1996. Environmental Activism and Global Civic Politics. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press. Weible, Christopher M. 2008. “Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis.” The Policy Studies Journal, 36(4): 615-635. Wiener, Jonathan Baert. 1999. “On the Political Economy of Global Regulation.” Georgetown Law Journal, 87: 749-794. Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1979. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston: Little, Brown. Yearly, Steven. 2009. “Sociology and Climate Change after Kyoto: What Roles for Social Science in Understanding Climate Change?” Current Sociology, 57(3): 389-405. Yong, Ren. 2008. “Strategic Transformation of Environment and Development in China: Green Opportunities. ” Paper Presented at The 23rd Pacific Economic Community Seminar, “Climate Change and Green Opportunities: Business, Society and Cooperation.” October 7, Grand Formosa Regent, Taipei. Young, Oran R.(ed). 1997. Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Young, Oran R., Leslie A. King, and Heike Schroeder (ed). 2008. Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Yu, Hongyuan. 2004a. “Global Environment Regime and Climate Policy Coordination in China.” Journal of Chinese Political Science, 9(2): 63-77. Yu, Hongyuan. 2004b. “Knowledge and Climate change Policy Coordination in China.” East Asia, 21(3): 58-77. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10641 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 科學知識與公共政策和環境治理之間的互動關係,始終是政策研究和環境政治學者重視的核心。目前,「氣候變遷」幾乎已成為全球面臨最迫切的議題。人口數目、能源消耗與溫室氣體排放量皆為全球數一數二的中國,究竟如何著手應對氣候變遷的治理工作,無疑是影響全球環境的重要關鍵。
本論文以全球環境治理和國際關係理論的「知識社群途徑」為基礎,透過文獻分析與赴北京進行的深度訪談,探索在中國氣候治理的知識社群:(1)主要包含哪些成員;(2)如何連結國際與國內的政策協調和運作;(3)是否符合知識社群途徑之假定,具有共同的規範信仰、因果信念和政策志業;(4)如何向政府當局打交道、向有權者說真話;以及(5)在中國實存脈絡下的特徵為何。 本論文將中國氣候治理的知識社群,依照特性分為:幕僚型研究機構、智庫型研究機構與大學研究機構、國際非政府組織、本土民間組織,以及企業夥伴等六類。除了科學與學術研究外,知識社群透過引進國際資金、技術與專案計畫之方式,協助中國進行減緩與調適之工作;在國內層次,一方面針對政府和基層學校進行培訓、教育和宣導,另一方面則與企業密切合作,推動節能減排之落實。 其次,本論文指出,中國氣候治理的知識社群,普遍將國家利益優先之想法奉為圭臬,並以「節能減排」作為重要信念與指導原則。不過,當涉及採取各類的政策工具(手段)與政策結果(目的)之連結關係時,社群成員仍有多元見解,口徑未必一致。社群成員因對各自組織之角色定位不同,遂展現出不同行事風格。至於,知識社群影響政府決策的管道,則初步分為兩種:「局外人參與途徑」耗費成本較高,也端視政府當局是否採納知識社群的專業建議。另一種則是最為直接的「局內人參與途徑」,但亦可能面臨流於為政治權力說話、背書的工具。 中國氣候治理的知識社群,普遍將學術研究與政府決策之間劃清界線,不傾向採取強烈的政策倡議。此外,社群成員間同時存在合作(計畫)與競爭(經費)的關係,並試圖建立自身組織的品牌和口碑。 最後,本論文重新思考幾項後設問題:知識社群是否必須和權力結構緊密相連?我們是否過於以目的論之眼光,期待知識社群有意識地向有權者說真話?由於很難將「知識」變項自政治權力和利益之糾結中抽離出來,本論文主張,除了知識生產之外,研究者仍須注意知識的應用層面,包括其自生產、詮釋到散布的過程,究竟如何捲入當前的政治論述、意識形態與制度框架中。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Policy researchers have paid much attention to the interactions between scientific knowledge, public policy and environmental governance. Currently, China has the most population, energy consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions in the world. Since climate change has become a critical issue, China’s reaction to climate change will have a great impact on global environment.
Based on the epistemic community approach (ECA) derived from global environmental governance and international relations theories, this paper uses literature analysis and in-depth interview in Beijing to explore epistemic communities in China’s climate governance. The study examines: (1) who the members of the epistemic communities are; (2) how these epistemic communities help facilitate international and domestic policy coordination; (3) whether these epistemic communities share common beliefs, casual beliefs, and policy enterprise; (4) how these epistemic communities interact with the government and tell the truth; and (5) what the characteristics of epistemic communities in the Chinese context are. The thesis classifies the epistemic communities in China’s climate governance into six types: government officials, think tanks, universities, international non-governmental organizations, grassroots organizations, and business. In addition to academic researches, epistemic communities also help China in mitigation and adaptation by introducing foreign funds, technologies and projects, as well as educating and training the officials and local schools, and cooperating with the enterprises at domestic levels. Second, the study shows that epistemic communities in China’s climate governance often put great emphasis on the national interests, and regard energy conservation and emission reduction as the guiding principle. However, when it comes to policy instruments (means) and policy outcomes (goals), there are still different opinions among the members of the epistemic communities. The members also demonstrate different behaviors due to members’ various self-positions. As for the approaches which the epistemic communities can take to influence the government, the thesis points out two kinds of approaches: the “outsider” and “insider”. The former one costs more and may not be adopted by the authority; the latter can be more direct, however, may be manipulated by the authority. The epistemic communities in China’s climate governance tend to draw a line between academic researches and governmental decisions, and seldom accept strong policy advocacies. Besides, there are both cooperation (in implementing programs) and competition (to the funds) among the epistemic community members, eager to build a good reputation. Finally, the thesis reconsiders some meta-questions, such as “Do the epistemic communities have to stay closely to the power structures?” “Do we over expect the epistemic communities can always communicate truthfully to authority?” Since it is hard to take knowledge out of the struggle of power and interest, this study claims that, in addition to knowledge production, researchers should pay attention to the applications of knowledge, including the process from which it is produced, interpreted, and represented. Researchers should also pay attention to the fact that knowledge would be enmeshed in current political discourses, ideologies, and institutional frameworks. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:46:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96322020-1.pdf: 1571584 bytes, checksum: 1a09fb9ee4a32e71a74eaaae13a1f9b9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書…………………………… I
謝辭………………………………… III 中文摘要……………………………… V 英文摘要……………………………… VII 第一章 緒論…………………………… 01 第一節 氣候變遷與中國角色之重要性…………… 01 第二節 科學知識、知識社群與公共政策…………… 06 第三節 中國氣候變遷政策演進………………… 13 第四節 論文章節安排……………………… 19 第二章 文獻檢閱………………………… 21 第一節 全球環境治理與國際(環境)典則………… 22 第二節 中國氣候變遷政策的研究回顧…………… 29 第三節 知識社群途徑之理論意涵……………… 35 第四節 小結與討論……………………… 43 第三章 研究設計………………………… 47 第一節 知識社群的概念界定………………… 47 第二節 研究問題………………………… 55 第三節 研究方法………………………… 56 第四章 中國氣候治理的知識社群初探……………… 61 第一節 中國氣候治理的主要知識社群成員………… 61 第二節 知識社群在國際與國內之協調運作………… 74 第三節 知識社群的異與同:三項指標的檢視………… 88 第四節 知識社群影響政府決策的途徑…………… 103 第五節 知識社群在中國實存脈絡下的特徵………… 112 第五章 結論…………………………… 123 第一節 主要研究結果摘要…………………… 123 第二節 綜合討論:重新審視知識社群途徑………… 127 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議……………… 136 參考文獻……………………………… 139 壹、中文部分…………………………… 139 貳、英文部分…………………………… 142 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 中國氣候治理的知識社群角色初探 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Preliminary Exploration of Epistemic Communities in China's Climate Governance | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 冷則剛(Tse-Kang Leng),曹俊漢(Jiun-HanTsao) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 氣候變遷,知識社群,全球環境治理,中國,氣候治理,氣候政策, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | climate change,epistemic community,global environmental governance,China,climate governance,climate policy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 149 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf | 1.53 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。